# 0_raw_data

thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030400.txt_2486
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030400.txt
subject: Re: [External]
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie SpineIla"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:31 PM", "subject": "[External]", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Melanie SpineIla", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:46 PM", "subject": "Re: [External]", "body": "We cannot print it since we don't subscribe"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie SpineIla"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 6:50:43 PM", "subject": "Re: [External]", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/01/03/new-trump-book-bannons-treasonous-claim-ivankas-presidential-ambitions-and-melanias-first-lady-concerns/?utm term=.17d17352b1a4"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030976.txt_2491
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030976.txt
subject: Fwd: FW: Reporter question
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Roy Black"], "timestamp": "5/29/2019 4:46:05 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Reporter question", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg iii", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 29, 2019 at 12:45 PM", "subject": "FW: Reporter question", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kate Briquelet", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberr"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 29, 2019 12:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Reporter question", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nHope all is well. Noticed this Guardian story about Michael Wolff's new book, which states Donald Trump purchased a Palm Beach property Mr. Epstein had planned to buy, behind Mr. Epstein's back. And that Mr. Epstein threatened to expose Trump's shady real estate deals. Do you know anything about this? Does Mr. Epstein have any knowledge of illegal or suspicious dealings by President Trump?\n\nhttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/may/28/bannon-trump-organization-criminal-enterprise-comments-michael-wolff-book"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028529.txt_2498
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028529.txt
subject: mission acomplished for some
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Philanthropy — Full text articles"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 13 2014 08:14 PM", "subject": "mission acomplished for some", "body": "Revealed: the world's most admired people\nStephan Shakespeare —Times\nBill Gates is the most admired person in the world.\naccording to a global survey for The Times by YouGov. The man who many\nsee as responsible for the democratisation of computing and who is the biggest activist philanthropist across the globe is\nhighly regarded everywhere.\nIn his home, America, he ranks only 5th, behind Pope Francis, President Obama, Billy Graham, and George W. Bush. Mr\nObama and the Pope have a strong lead in Western nations but Mr Gates is highly regarded in every country polled, from\nBrazil to Egypt, Nigeria to Indonesia, Britain to Russia to Australia. He tops the poll in China — as respondents there said: \"He\ngot into a good university, but gave up studying to start his business. He has become a rich man despite dropping out of school\n... He has a successful career and a caring heart — he is ordinary, but great.\"\nThe Queen came highest in Britain and second in Australia, but didn't make the Indian top ten. Nevertheless she is the most\nadmired woman in the world, in 17th place, closely followed by Angelina Jolie and Oprah Winfrey.\nHalf of the top ten admired in Russia are women, including the pop singer Alla Pugacheva and the Queen. That is the highest\nfigure in all countries surveyed — women are strikingly under-represented.\nSome light is shed on this by comparing our results with a recent Gallup poll in America, which asked for most admired man\nand woman in separate questions. In that poll, Bill Clinton scored 2 per cent and Hillary Clinton 15. YouGov asked a single\nquestion, not differentiating men and women, and the two Clintons rated about the same. The two polls also show the power of\nthe media to direct public attention: Gallup polled early in December, and Pope Francis was \"most admired\" by only 4 per cent.\nBy the time of the YouGov survey, Time magazine had made him its Person of the Year, and he shot up to 21 per cent.\nBusiness leaders did well in general. YouGov puts Sir Richard Branson 4th in Britain, the Hong Kong billionaire Sir Li Kashing\nwas sixth in China; the Nigerian industrialist Aliko Dangote was third in his home country; Silvio Santos, a media billionaire,\nwas 4th in Brazil; Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the tycoon recently freed by Vladimir Putin, was 8th in Russia; while Warren Buffett,\nwho is admired in India, Pakistan and China, was 8th in the world.\nActors and musicians do less well. With the exception of the Bollywood superstar Amitabh Bachchan, Ms Jolie and Stephen\nFry, who confirms his enormous Twitter following by making 7th in Britain, just below Desmond Tutu. Johnny Depp and Brad\nPitt get close to the top in a couple of countries and Justin Bieber did well in Indonesia, but the rock star and anti-poverty\ncampaigner Bono is notable by his absence.\nSportsmen were more highly regarded, with the Indian cricketer Sachin Tendulkar 5th in the world — but only because he is so\nadored in the world's second-most populous country. The footballer Lionel Messi had broader support, reaching 15th in the\nworld. In Britain, David Beckham squeaked into 10th place.\nIn only two countries of the 13 surveyed did no local politician make it into the top ten —Australia and the UK. The omission\nwas most striking in Britain where Nigel Farage, the top politician, was in 16th place. David Cameron received the \"most\nadmired\" accolade from only two people in a thousand. In Germany, Angela Merkel scored 65 times higher at 13 per cent,\nsecond only to the Pope. Vladimir Putin topped the Russian poll with a whopping 24 per cent, Nicolas Sarkozy was third in\nFrance and Goodluck Jonathan 8th in Nigeria. Edward Snowden, responsible for leaking classified documents that revealed\nthe extent of surveillance by America's National Security Agency, was 10th most admired in the country that granted him\nasylum, Russia. He also showed strongly in Germany. We also asked who was the most famous person in the world. The\noverwhelming choice was Mr Obama, with 26 per cent, and Mr Gates behind on 12.\nYouGov polled in Great Britain, France, Germany, Russia, the US, Australia, Pakistan, Indonesia, India, China, Egypt, Nigeria\nand Brazil, representing over half of the world's population and the most populated country on each continent, and spoke to\ntotal of 13,895 people around the world. We used a mix of internet and mobile phone surveys. In most countries we achieved\nrepresentative samples but in some we were unable to achieve good representation of rural communities. Our survey asked\ntwo open-ended questions, seeking write-in answers: who do you think is the most famous person in the world, and who do\nyou personally most admire?\nAlthough we specified that only living people should be considered, many wanted to choose Nelson Mandela anyway, and had\nwe conducted the survey a month earlier he would have come top. In China there was significant support for Mao Zedong,\nZhou Enlai and Deng Xiaoping, with 14 per cent between them, and had those respondents considered only the living, Xi\nJinping would have scored even more highly.\nWho's Who\n- Narendra Modi, an Indian politician, is the prime ministerial candidate of the BJP, the main opposition party.\n- Amitabh Bachchan is a Bollywood superstar, who was the \"angry young man\" of Hindi cinema.\n- Abdul Kalam is an Indian scientist and was president of his country 2002-07.\n- Anna Hazare held a series of hunger strikes in India in a successful campaign for anti-corruption laws.\n- Arvind Kejriwal is the Chief Minister of Delhi, and worked alongside Hazare.\n- Peng Liyuan, a Chinese folk singer, is the wife of President Xi Jingping.\n- The philanthropist Abdul Sattar Edhi founded the Edhi Foundation, the largest welfare organisation in Pakistan.\n- Joko 'Jokowi' Widodo, the governor of Jakarta, is a populist leader who may run in the 2014 Indonesian presidential election.\nStephan Shakespeare is CEO of YouGov."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030366.txt_2499
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030366.txt
subject: RE: today
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Karp, Brad S <bkarp@paulweiss.com]"], "timestamp": "Friday, December 15, 2017 2:51 PM", "subject": "today", "body": "http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/15/report-feminist-lawyer-promised-cash-to-trump-sexual-harassment-accusers/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=idealmedia&utm_campaign=dailycaller.com&utm_term=68814&utm_content=1"}, {"sender": "Karp, Brad S", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2017 8:25:35 PM", "subject": "RE: today", "body": "Wow, call me naive, but that's something."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031498.txt_2506
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031498.txt
subject: Re: Saudi money
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 1:42:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "Too high? Too low?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "no"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion that\nhas been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with what you\nknow?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "words that you to refer to one thing, USA. the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very\nuseful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress in\naddition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even in tech, needs bio\ntech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are 20k members of a\ntribe. called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is focused on bin salman, or the\nvery top. no one is wondering where they can find the local costco... _ but they are aware that a message\nneeds to be sent to their population , regarding the next 20 years,\n\nsocial media, and the selfie crowds post the best of everything, their cutest pictures the amazing\nfood , the luxury resorts. the masses see these things and as the difference between expectations and\nreality widen, the anger grows. trump has tapped in.\n\nwith the passage of the 9 11 saudi bill, unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france that\nrevolted against their own aristocracty, with the internet and globalization of discontect it is now the\namericans that can revolt against the saudi leadership. _it is the americans that are demanding women\ndrive. not the saudis"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have been called in to help on a big NYT investigation into how low oil prices have been effecting\nthe personal finances of royal family in Saudi Arabia. Obviously they called in much of their cash\nfrom the likes of BlackRock and others but I thought you might have some ideas. Maybe some\npeople to talk to?\n\nI would think its more than cutting down on yachts and private planes or selling real estate in\nParis, Istanbul, London.\n\nAny thoughts?\nPS: does my story on Abraaj get me a meeting with Gates next time he is in town:)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030786.txt_2514
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030786.txt
subject: from ny times today
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jabor Y."], "timestamp": "4/10/2018 9:01:05 AM", "subject": "from ny times today", "body": "While Mr. Bannon and Mr. Trump have yet to repair their rift, the president’s moves against China represent a\npolicy victory for his excommunicated aide. During his final weeks in the White House, Mr. Bannon kept a\nwhiteboard in his office, on which he had scrawled a calendar for trade actions against China, the European\n\nUnion and others."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026017.txt_2519
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026017.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10 2016 10:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Shocking. So ridiculous."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 5:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028580.txt_2520
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028580.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 8:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 6:26 PM Weingarten, Reid (wrote:\n\n| will at some point....what time do you leave tomorrow\n\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you nuts. ima cowardly warm blooded jew. call me"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You are not in nyc now are you?\n\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im told southern District trying yo get out a rico claim against the org"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesusfuckingchrist....give me one of them....ready for a change\n\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028501.txt_2521
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028501.txt
subject: Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hello Jeffrey —\n\nI hope all is well with you. As per Peggy Siegal's office, I have included here the invitation to the IFP Gotham Awards ceremony, which will be held on Monday, November 27 at Cipriani Wall Street in New York City.\n\nThis year's ceremony is going to be another successful event. We couldn't be more thrilled with this year's impressive group of Tributees. The Actress Tribute will go to Nicole Kidman and the Actor Tribute to Dustin Hoffman. The Director Tribute will be given to Sofia Coppola, with the Cinematographer Tribute going to Ed Lachman. With the Industry Tribute, we will be honoring Jason Blum, founder of Blumhouse Productions. And we simply couldn't be more pleased to honor Vice President Al Gore with this year's special Humanitarian Tribute. With nominees this year ranging from Willem Dafoe, Adam Sandler and Robert Pattison to Margot Robbie, Lois Smith and Mary J. Blige, this year's ceremony looks to be the most star studded ever.\n\nPlease let me know if you have any questions.\n\nBest regards,\nSteven"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:40 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "just send to peggy. you her co. its better for her"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "11/16/2017 9:23:58 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Sounds good, works for me.\n\nSo, Peggy, if you could just let me know what info to include on the donation letter and invoice, I'll send that along your way.\n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable):\nCONTACT NAME:\nADDRESS LINE 1:\nADDRESS LINE 2:\n\nThanks,\nSteven"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032939.txt_2523
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032939.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy"], "timestamp": "12/1/2016 11:55:58 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "can you do earlier tomorw. >??"}, {"sender": "Kathy", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "The dems are going to take out a couple of Trump's nominees, and Mnuchin may be one of them."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033399.txt_2533
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033399.txt
subject: Re: G550
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "12/18/2018 12:57:26 PM", "subject": "Re: G550", "body": "boca good idea"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:21 PM", "subject": "Re: G550", "body": "Jeffrey \nPete informs the new spoilers board install going well, should be return to service late Wed evening, or Noon \nThursday at the latest.,they are painting the white underside this evening, Blue upper surface tomorrow and \nclear coat Wed morn. \nPresident Trump arrives Friday at 4:30pm ish. \nShould Dave and Darren move the G550 to Boca Thursday? \nThx \nLarry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027032.txt_2545
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027032.txt
subject: Fwd: Summers withdraws from Fed race
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2013 11:12:33 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Summers withdraws from Fed race", "body": "A major blow to a friend. Lest BO takes him to replace JL.\nNow he'll probably be free in the next few days. EB"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028594.txt_2553
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028594.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:14 PM", "subject": null, "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029852.txt_2555
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029852.txt
subject: Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/22/2017 8:53:05 PM", "subject": "Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Oy."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 22, 2017, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:39 PM", "subject": "Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "Parker, Ashley", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, May 22, 2017 3:19 PM", "subject": "Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019321.txt_2556
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019321.txt
subject: Re: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon <q>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:58 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Hicks?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:02:16 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "If you are going to play here , you’ll have to spend time , europe by remote doesn’t work . Lots and lots of face time and hand holding"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 6:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "its doable , but time consuming, there are many leaders of countries we can organize for you to have one on ones. however. you will have to come, stay 8-10 days. , then no more than two weeks later. the same. The fear is that you gin up their hopes and emotions and then abandon them. I think you want to be an insider, not an outsider flying in and out. did you get the first cut of american carnage? .?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Agree 100%\n\nHow do I do that???\n\nAmerican Carnage amazing -- Ari Emmanual financed it and he loves it---Erolls besties tell him it will end his career because he gave a platform to a monster\n\nOfficially in Venice , Toronto and New York Film Festival\nSkipping telluride"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 9:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "We can talk about at your convenience"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/23/2018 1:50:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021406.txt_2563
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021406.txt
subject: Re: Alexandra Wolf
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Sat Apr 02 09:02:02 2011", "subject": "Re: Alexandra Wolf", "body": "http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Alexandra Wolf", "body": "Just read Alex's blog. It's pretty harmless.\n\nDo you know Debbie Bancroft? Why is she giving quotes about you? She is a fat drunk with no money and a bad marriage. She writes or did write a pathetic social column about losers. Did you ever meet her? She is a joke.\nPeg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "4/4/2011 12:21:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Alexandra Wolf", "body": "never"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033023.txt_2566
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033023.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well . congragulations"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf .. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food@"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 12:34:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023440.txt_2568
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023440.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional , emotional. and financial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "\"girls?\" careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres, hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any.....also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im on for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me....just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "train? yes , i will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" well' -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "of course not, he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "free now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I think I should do it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "lets see how you feel sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:18 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Good advice."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "no need to. call eric and get a data point"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I will. The rent on the apartment is significantly more than the monthly salary."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:16 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how much and who pays now?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I have so much more info to tell you on Sunday."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:32 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "decision :easier, harder, more complex?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Both harder and easier. He was there."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:46 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I assume that means harder to say no, ? easier to say yes. ."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Harder to say no for sure."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:52 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "try to get a good night sleep. see you sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 9:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I will try."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Did you read David Brooks today?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 5:29:55 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "He is a pseudo intellectual. Friendship is a complex biological process . Part altruism part cooperation, it does not lead to genetic fitness , friends are not inherited with genes . Nick christophalos at kit has done much work. That being said, I get your point"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031467.txt_2580
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031467.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, 16 May 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am kind of shocked that our reporters did not contact you re the Trump/women story. Seems to me he got off rather lightly.\n\nHow are you doing?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Me too"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Lando", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/16/2016 3:56:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "is the other stuff ever going to come out?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033400.txt_2583
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033400.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 7:03 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Apologies for requesting support in what was originally intended as an update on work done\ni am done with that, you will receive no more messages from me regarding funding, i am most grateful for\nyour help—without it, i doubt i would have a book in view on Honour killings—i can finish it on my own and\nfully intend to\nyou once said you would \"never not support me\" but never, as we both know, is a very long time—i am much\nmore scared of Trump's capacity to destroy the stock market—but as long as i do not get orders from you to\nsell, i will ride it out\ni hope everything is good in your life\nwarmest best, as always\nbob"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Robert Trivers"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 12:13:56 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i never receveidc anything asking for support? what are your referring to"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030330.txt_2584
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030330.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jes Staley"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 09, 2014 7:02 AM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "eveything ok, we waited"}, {"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I got completely swamped, and then had a dinner with George Tenet and my military guy from Brookings. My fault. Is larry coming by again today?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jes Staley"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 09, 2014 8:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "nope. how was tenet"}, {"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 9 2014 01:39 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Everyone is talking about Gates comments on Obama. Surprised by what Gates did. I talked with Daley yesterday, and he thought that Gates making his comments while Obama is still in the White House, completely irresponsible.\n\nLots of talk on Israel and Iran. Gives ahigher chance that Israel goes it alone than I have heard elsewhere."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030456.txt_2586
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030456.txt
subject: Re: Fwd: FW: Please forward
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peter Mandelson [iis", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 7 2011 05:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": "No!!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Mandelson BT"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 05:01 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kirsty Mackenzie", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07,2011 11:11 AM", "subject": "RE: Please forward", "body": "Iam writing in an attempt to make contact with Jeffrey Epstein and wondered if you would, as his attorney, forward this message on to him?\n\nWe are keen to explore the possibility of conducting an interview with Mr Epstein, on the subject of the stories which are circulating, however inaccurately, about both him and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York; we'd be keen to hear from Mr Epstein first hand so that the various and at times, speculative reporting which is at large in the UK press can be better scrutinised?\n\nLet me tell you a bit about the Today programme.\n\nToday is the BBC's main morning news show; we have been part of the BBC for over 50 years and are generally considered one of the most important news broadcast outlets - either on radio or TV - here in the UK. We set the news agenda for the BBC and in many respects we set the daily news agenda for the country. Our interviews are regularly re broadcast across the BBC's national and international news network including - BBC World, BBC World Service and BBC Online. The combination of these outlets means the global 'reach' of a BBC Today programme interview is second to none.\n\nProgramme guests have included a selection of some of the biggest names in politics, business, international relations and the arts including US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, President Nicholas Sarkozy, President Hamid Karzai, HRH the Prince of Wales, former President Musharraf, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former President Bill Clinton, Senator George Mitchell, Al Gore, Kofi Annan, former Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Dalai Lama, Bill Gates, George Soros, Stephen Hawking, Sir Paul McCartney, Mick Jaggar and Salman Rushdie.\n\nWe are aprogramme that carries considerable weight and influence and which prides itself in being a first port of call for many of the most important and influential figures on the international stage."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031301.txt_2589
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031301.txt
subject: could you put something like this out. if you want
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jean Luc Brune"], "timestamp": "1/20/2015 12:14:30 AM", "subject": "could you put something like this out. if you want", "body": "[have to hand it to ms[__ I'm sure she deserves the pretty penny she has made for her effort . She has\ncertainly caught the imagination of a public hungry for salacious fiction. To suggest her story is anything other\nthan that, a fiction , is ludicrous. Presidents at dinner on caribean islands. ( clinton was never ever there, easy\nto confirm ). Sharing a bath with a Prince ( bathtub too small even for one adult ). sex slave being paid\nthousands of dollars. ( while at the exact same time, she was working as a hostess in a burger bar ). being\nlent out to a prime minister though this prime mininster, never out of sight of his massive security detail also\nnever visited the island, , sex on a small airplane with a famous lawyer while the other passengers must have\nbeen all looking out the window during the event . I would have thought that her fabrications were readilly\napparent , but now , being asked to deny what the press has termed her \" allegations \" is frankly silly. ok, to\nplay along I deny each and every allegation . The only person she didn't suggest she was forced to have sex\nwith , was Bilbo Baggins. , maybe its in the sequel."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031315.txt_2591
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031315.txt
subject:
  Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Michael", "Charles"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 15, 2016 5:35 PM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Regards,\n\nDarren"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025970.txt_2593
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025970.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:42:23 -0400", "subject": "RE: ", "body": "congragulations"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you!\nDid you really like it?\nHow did you like furniture?\nWhat would you change it?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:01:22 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i think it was terrific , the only thing i would think about is having only one lit sculpture at a time . put one in storage or covered, but you want to call attention to one at a time."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 9:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great! Happy to hear it.\nTrust your advice and taste - this is why I am asking!\nB"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:06:27 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and maybe have the large colums black instead of gold, as the gold paint is not as good as the gold metal objects."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 9:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was thinking of black.\nIt is not a gold pain but a gold leafing. It took them 2 months to do it.\nWhat I do not like that it came out more as a Trump gold that an old gold."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:16:43 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "exactly"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Are you around this Friday and weekend.\nI am - and leaving on Sunday at 5pm for Greece until August 15th/.\nIf you around would love to see you.\nJust a quick question - do you have any name for a potential LP for my fund. I am planning a final close end of September /October.\nPlease let me know"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, 28 Jul 2016 06:18:55 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will see one maybe today. . i am off until aug 29"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/28/2016 2:48:17 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Just called you.\nCall me when you can.\nWhere will you be until 29th?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033372.txt_2595
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033372.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 3:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "direction of trump? criminal tax fraud?? https://therealdeal.com/2018/04/26/shvo-settles-tax-evasion-case/?utm source=TheRZ.E-ri  Lerts&utm campaign=9f5d9ae9f9- EMAIL CAMPAIGN 2017 06 06&utm medium=email&utm term=0 6e806bb87a-9f5d9ae9f9-385784701"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 26, 2018, at 3:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Careful. Max might call"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/26/2018 7:55:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ok"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029113.txt_2598
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029113.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "22?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Of courses"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You are welcome at my house always . And more private"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. just send me the address again and the code to the door so i can get to the second floor? and send me the day and time.\nthnx"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "10pm should I bring special cake from New York"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sorry that is Mor the gate w"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 9:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i\nm at the door but i will wait for my time.. i dont want to come early to find trump in your housee"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 11:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no come now !!!"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheec", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2017 11:13:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "like always .. it was pleasure and fun to visit you. thnx for the nice gifthra"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033414.txt_2601
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033414.txt
subject: Essays
messages:
  [{"sender": "Edward Rod Larsen", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/30/2018 11:00:04 AM", "subject": "Essays", "body": "Essay 1. \nComing from an international background, and having lived in Oslo, Tel Aviv, New York and London by the age of eighteen, I \nbelieve that the international profile of NYU will provide the best environment for my college education, with the added benefit of \nreturning to the place where I've spent most of my childhood and where my mother will be posted as Norwegian Ambassador to the \nUN in January 2019. \nNYU's Art History department appeals to me because of its wide range of courses, from the global art of antiquity to the \ncontemporary. My passion is the Italian Renaissance and the rich history behind it, especially the works of 15th century masters such \nas Masaccio and Bellini. Some of the courses that NYU offers such as \"Early masters of Italian Renaissance painting\" and \"Florentine \nVillas: An Interpretation Based on Historical, Social Factors\" are, therefore appealing to me. What I find exciting, is not only the \nvisual aesthetics and analysis of these masterpieces, but also the manner in which the Renaissance emphasised scientific and \neconomic innovation, areas of study the Global Liberal Arts programme would offer. NYU's unique campus in Florence would give \nme a once in lifetime opportunity to spend a year immersing myself in the art, culture and history of Italy. This would be an exciting \nexperience to have while studying for a Bachelor's degree in Art History, and would compliment my main interests in the subject. \nAs one of the prime cultural centres in the world, NYU's location in NYC is the perfect place to broaden knowledge within \ncontemporary art. I am very much looking forward to visiting the Whitney Biennia this May. In addition the New museum, which \nshows a lot of the kind of work I find interesting is a short walk away from campus. \nTaking advantage of being based in central London for the past year, I have completed the Chairman's Programme at Christies, work \nexperience at the Courtauld Gallery and I will be working at Maddox Gallery in the near future. Similarly, I want to take advantage of \nbeing based in NYC to gain as much experience as possible. I have chosen to apply Early Decision to NYU as it is the only American \nuniversity I will be applying to, as there is no better place to obtain experience of the contemporary art world than New York City. \nEssay 2. \nFrom the age of extremes to the age of bewilderment \nWhat captivates me more than anything else is the different ideological phases of the 20th century and how art can be used as a \ntool of advancement and reflection on ideological and political developments. \nMy fascination began when I read; Eric Hobsbawm's \"Age Of Extremes\" and has since developed through books such as \nBenjamin Carter Heft's \"The Death Of Democracy\" and Yuval Harari \"A Brief History Of Tomorrow\" and \"21 Lessons For \nThe 21st Century\". \nIn the years after the First World War, until the end of the Second World War, three political models for shaping the future of \nnation states emerged; Fascism, Communism and liberal democracy. These all offered great ideas for the future of the world. \nFascism and Communism shared some common features: authoritarian, strong leaders and a belief that their revolutions had to \nbe carried through with violence. This led to the mass murders in the Nazi concentration camps and in the Soviet Gulags. \nIn the mid war periods, the \"Litfass columns\" that were originally designed to carry advertising, became the outdoor galleries \nfor the war of ideologies. The political poster was born. High quality posters from every political party in Germany popped up \non the columns. Hitler's propaganda chief G8ebels stated that the Nazi election campaign should be run through speeches and \nposters. The other parties responded in kind. An art form thus became an essential political tool in the battle for votes. The \npropagandist Art used by the Nazis and communists alike was essential in helping sell their message to the masses. \nIndeed, much of the art that was critical of these movements was suppressed or censored and \"subversive\" artists cowed, in \nsome cases imprisoned or even worse. \nThe liberal democratic model departed sharply from these authoritarian perspectives by presenting the alternative of free and \ntransparent elections, the rule of law and freedom of speech. In the mid-war period the three narratives were competing to be the \nconceptual frame for society. After the Second World War fascism was crushed leaving the two competing ideologies of \ncommunism and liberal democracy. After the demise of communism in 1989, through to the late 1990's, liberal democracy was \nvictorious in the idealogical battlefield. Some historians, like Francis Fukuyama, went so far as to proclaim this period as \"the \nend of history\". \nA key piece of art that championed this kind of ideology was Sheppard Fairey's campaign poster for Barack Obama. In this \nposter, Fairey, a well established graffiti artist uses urban colours and stencilling techniques combined with the message \n\"HOPE\" to promote the incoming presidents positive values and popularity with the young. It is notable that Fairey's most \nrecent political poster protests the Trump presidency rather than promote it. \nWith the rise of so called \"illiberal democracy\", with strong parties standing for populist ideologies, we have now moved into \nwhat can be described as the age of bewilderment. We were not in fact at the \"end of history\". Once again the future looks \nunpredictable and insecure and artists are responding in different ways. \nJeremy Deller, a British Turner prize winning artist created a work which features a car damaged in the bombing of the historic \nMutanabbi Street book market, which resulted in the deaths of 38 people. Here, an art work has been used to show the aftermath \nof an event. This event was the result of the Iraq war, which was seen as a way to spread democracy. Here Art is used as a \nmeans by which to explore the effects of ideology rather than promote it, another really interesting area in the study of the \nintersections between ideology and art. \nExploring how art reflects the historical and ideological contexts of the world around it is fascinating to me and I would love to \nstudy these ideas in more depth at undergraduate level."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030324.txt_2602
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030324.txt
subject: macreonomics issue
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/10/2011 9:45:51 PM", "subject": "macreonomics issue", "body": "do you think something like this is worthwhile and should i engage?\n\nFor Federal Programs, a Taste of Market Discipline\n\nBy DAVID LEONHARDT\nPublished: February 8, 2011\n\nWouldn’t it be nice if taxpayers could somehow get a refund for government programs that didn’t work?\nInstead, the opposite tends to happen. Programs that fail to make a difference — like many of those that train\nworkers for new jobs — endure indefinitely. Often, policy makers don’t even know which work and which\ndon’t, because rigorous evaluation is rare in government. And competition, which punishes laggards in the\nprivate sector, is typically absent in the public sector.\n\nBut there is some good news on this front. Lately, both American and British policy makers have been thinking\nabout how to bring some of the competitive discipline of the market to government programs, and they have hit\non an intriguing idea.\n\nDavid Cameron’s Conservative government in Britain is already testing it, at a prison 75 miles north of London.\nThe Bloomberg administration in New York is also considering the idea, as is the State of Massachusetts.\nPerhaps most notably, President Obama next week will propose setting aside $100 million for seven such pilot\nprograms, according to an administration official.\n\nThe idea goes by one of two names: pay for success bonds or social impact bonds. Either way, nonprofit groups\nlike foundations pay the initial money for a new program and also oversee it, with government approval. The\ngovernment will reimburse them several years later, possibly with a bonus — but only if agreed-upon\nbenchmarks show that the program is working.\n\nIf it falls short, taxpayers owe nothing.\n\nThe first British test is happening at Her Majesty’s Prison Peterborough, where 60 percent of the prisoners are\nconvicted of another crime within one year of release. Depressingly enough, that recidivism rate is typical for a\nBritish prison.\n\nTo reduce the rate, a nonprofit group named Social Finance is playing a role akin to venture capitalist. It has\nraised about $8 million from investors, including the Rockefeller Foundation. Social Finance also oversees three\nsocial service groups helping former prisoners find work, stay healthy and the like. If any of those groups starts\nto miss its performance goals, it can be replaced.\n\nFor the investors to get their money back starting in 2014 — with interest — the recidivism rate must fall at\nleast 7.5 percent, relative to a control group. If the rate falls 10 percent, the investors will receive the sort of\nreturn that the stock market historically delivers. “It’s been only a few months,” says Tracy Palandjian, who\nrecently opened a new Social Finance office in Boston, “but the numbers are coming in O.K.”\n\nAntony Bugg-Levine of the Rockefeller Foundation told me it had invested in the project for two main reasons.\nOne, it expected to get its money back and then be able to reuse it. Two, if social impact bonds work, they have\nthe potential to attract for-profit investors — and vastly expand the pool of capital that’s available for social\nprograms.\n\nClearly, social impact bonds have limitations. For starters, it’s hard to see how private money could ever pay for\nmultibillion-dollar programs like Medicaid or education.\n\nJust as important, the execution of any bond program will be complicated. It will depend on coming up with the\nright performance measures, which is no small matter. Done wrong, the measures will end up rewarding\nprograms lucky (or clever) enough to enroll participants who are more likely to succeed no matter what."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031473.txt_2606
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031473.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Keough, Michael", "recipients": ["Will Bohlen", "King, Kathryn", "SE Viller, Michael", "elyn Wohl ford", "Y. Alp Asiandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kuler", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman", "David Marin"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:28 PM", "subject": null, "body": "aides have said Ankara would view as hostile any foreign government that gave sanctuary to leaders of the\n\nGulen movement.\n\nTurkey hasn't yet made a formal extradition request to the U.S., and Turkish officials say they plan to provide\n\nmore evidence to the Justice Department.\n\nMr. Gulen, 75 years old, came to the U.S. in 1999, and has a devoted following in Turkey and other countries.\n\nAt a press conference in Washington on Friday, Mr. Gulen’s lawyers said they have spoken to the Justice\n\nDepartment about the demands for extradition but are unaware of the U.S. government’s thinking or plans.\n\nAsked if they feared for his life, one of Mr. Gulen’s lawyers, Reid Weingarten said, “We do. We’re very\nconcemed about his safety.’’ The lawyer said they are discussing whether to ask U.S. authorities for help in\n\nsafeguarding their client.\n\nA Turkish court has issued a warrant for Mr. Gulen’s arrest, and Turkish and U.S. authorities have privately\ndiscussed scenarios in which Mr. Gulen might be extradited. But several U.S. officials said they cannot now\n\nenvision a scenario in which they turn him over to Turkey.\n\n“Tt would be unprecedented and appalling if the U.S. took a frail, almost octogenarian, plopped him on a plane\nto go back into that kind of setting with the hideous things that are being said about him by the entire Turkish\n\ngovernment,’’ said Mr. Weingarten.\n\n“The bluster, the conspiracy theories, and the threats of Mr. Erdogan are not strong enough to overwhelm the\nAmerican legal system,” he added. “And for that reason we believe that Mr. Gulen should not and will not be\n\nextradited.’’\n\nMr. Weingarten said the chances that his client helped plot a coup from his base in the Poconos is “about as\n\nlikely” as a meteor striking the lawyer’s office while he was speaking.\n\nWrite to Devlin Barrett at devlin.barrett@wsj.com"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032722.txt_2609
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032722.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:02 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "mcgann and mcmasters tried to resign"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:05 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "And...???? Trump stopped them? He cannot stand mcgahn"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "mcgann feels if he stays he risks indicment"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Stevie boy is all over the place"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Number ? Funny story"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/16/2018 8:36:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Acela...type it or wait till I get to a quiet place"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030745.txt_2613
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030745.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["G Maxwell [GMax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:18", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes,,"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:31", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iam on the phone with other attny getting you an answer."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["G Maxwell [GMax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 2:36:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ok"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032050.txt_2628
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032050.txt
subject: The New York Times: Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/22/2019 10:56:44 PM", "subject": "The New York Times: Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business", "body": "Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business\nThe New York Times\nPresident Trump's former lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, discussed possible irregularities at the Trump\nOrganization. He wants a reduced prison sentence. Read the full story\nShared from Apple News"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031329.txt_2630
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031329.txt
subject: Middle East Update - May 25-31, 2011
messages:
  [{"sender": "Middle East Update [middle.east.update@hotmail.com]", "recipients": ["Middle East Update [middle.east.update@hotmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2011 10:47:23 PM", "subject": "Middle East Update - May 25-31, 2011", "body": "Middle East Update\n\nMay 25-31, 2011\n\nSyria\nInternational pressure on Damascus is mounting. After the US imposed sanctions on the Syrian leadership earlier in May,\n\nthe EU foreign ministers agreed to impose travel bans and to freeze the assets of President Assad and nine other Syrian\nsenior officials. Within days of the EU announcement, Canada invoked similar travel and economic sanctions.\n\nWhile Russia blocked any reference in the G8 communiqué to the possibility of deferring the issue of Syria to the UN\nSecurity Council, the communiqué’s compromise language illustrates the international community's increased pressure on\nthe regime. The G8 leaders stated that they were “appalled” by the death of peaceful protesters and called on the Syrian\nleadership to immediately stop using force against its people or the G-8 countries would “consider taking further measures’.\n\nAt the same time, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallan—the leader of the Lebanese party Hizbullah—called on the Syrian people to\ngive the government time to effectuate reforms, arguing that President Assad believes in reforming the system and is\ndetermined to implement change. The Hizbullah leader denied that his party has dispatched fighters to assist the Syrian\nregime in quelling the protest movement. Anti-lran and -Hizbullah slogans were chanted in a number of Syrian cities in\nresponse to Nasrallah’s defense of the regime and his pictures were burned in Deir Ezzor in eastern Syria.\n\nSyrian protesters declared Friday “the day of the Guardians of the Homeland’—a reference to the Syrian armed forces—in\nan effort to encourage the army to join the uprising. Security and military forces appear, however, to be stepping up their\ncampaign in an attempt to end the protests. Tens of people were killed or wounded over the weekend and tanks have\nentered two suburbs of the city of Homs, Rastan, and Talbiseh. The heavy-handed repression by police and military officials\nmay lead demonstrators to consider a recourse to arms.\n\nThe government is cracking down on protesters’ use of social media, but, in contrast to what occurred in Egypt, it has\nrefrained from a general shut down of the internet. Security officials are forcing dissidents to turn over their Facebook\n\npasswords and have switched off 3G mobile networks in order to prevent the uploading of protestor videos to YouTube.\nThe electricity and phone service has been cut off in neighborhoods where discontent is mounting.\n\nFacebook and, in particular, its “Syrian Revolution 2011” page, has been a vital platform for activists to mobilize protests\nand to disseminate information. Syria has over 580,000 Facebook users. In response to government measures, protesters\nhave created multiple Facebook pages under different names and have given their Facebook passwords to friends in case\nthey are arrested or disappear and their comments opposing the Assad regime need to be quickly removed from personal\nwebpages.\n\nSyrian activists acknowledge their debt to the Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions, further improvising and improving on their\ntactics on a daily basis in an effort to avoid retribution by the regime and to sustain the protest movement. Daytime\ndemonstrations have moved to the evening in order to make it more difficult for security forces to identify individual protesters\nand to single them out for arrest. After dark, protesters can disperse to unlit alleyways to escape arrest—a tactic Syrian\nactivists call “tayyara” or flying.\n\nYemen\n\nThe authority of President Saleh’s government continues to erode rapidly and Yemen appears to be edging closer towards\na civil war. Tribal fighters in the capital of Sanaa, have gained control of key ministries, including the Interior Ministry.\n\nBrigades from the Republican Guard—the President’s main forces—have surrendered to tribal fighters east and west of the\ncapital who have succeeded in blocking their deployment to Sanaa.\n\nAccording to well-informed sources, the Vice President, the Prime Minister, and the Speaker of the Yemeni Consultative\nCouncil have tried to convince President Saleh to sign the agreement mediated by the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) in"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030751.txt_2636
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030751.txt
subject: more to follow
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "3/30/2015 1:52:00 AM", "subject": "more to follow", "body": "Pg 5 first par — reporter speaks about a “sex slave ring” and speaks in the plural “sex slaves” suggesting more\nthan one accusation\n\nPg 8 Ist par — reporter should clarify that the young women at your house (and later on your plane) are\ncomely but clearly not underage\n\nPg 20- might lead a reader to think you helped clients hide wealth raises flags)\n\nPg 21 — Hoffenberg mentioned — I assume from what everyone including J Sweet says he is nuts but not\nflattering and totally irrelevant to the story\n\nPg 25 — quoting you on massages — your adversaries will exploit this to show a lack of remorse, minimizing\nthe conduct ete -\n\nPg 25-26 — don’t help him with SG — he’s confusing SG and HR — whatever SGs age her website said she was\n18\n\nPg 26 — he loops back to your “description” which opens reporter up to tough depoto\n\nPg 28 — your quotes re NPA being Kafkaesque..... can be exploited to harm you\n\nPg 30 — he writes about VR — “new chapter” — sounds like he is quoting you — he can preface it with\n“according to court papers...” and not suggest you are narrating the description of the VR allegations\n\nPg 31 — he writes that you said this “this is all utterly false” re VR allegations should limit denial to Clinton,\nGore —\n\nPg 31 — he writes that VR is now suing you for 50M _ not true case over.\n\nPg 31-2 — close to end where he says in essence the only thing you regret is not being more circumspect re\nlegal advice — not wise ,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022945.txt_2638
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022945.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/7/2017 5:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/ the same boies that represents who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and clinton - boies clients, he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and though she gave details of a dinnner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife. boies is going to be in the fining line, from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG„ his fees were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as an insurance co. -- ... phone only"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i am more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/7/2017 2:55:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "As they are both bulkshitters"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030989.txt_2640
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030989.txt
subject: Wolff Book
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/29/2019 10:28:52 PM", "subject": "Wolff Book", "body": "iam sure you read attached articles already on internet..\n\nhttps://www.rawstory.com/2019/05/new-book-paints-sordid-picture-of-trump-real-estate-deal-involving-russian-oligarch-and-jeffrey-epstein/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032736.txt_2646
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032736.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 5:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown? ref=home"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 12:19:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He is scaring the shit out of me now. He could well tank global economy. Can Barrack talk sense to him anymore?\nMaybe it's time for you to jump in now. Given how he is throwing caution to wind in such epic fashion, why wouldn't he take your call?\nGive it a shot!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030318.txt_2647
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030318.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "\"Sweetheart deal! \" So goes the critique of the resolution of a long-ago case involving our former client -- and now-friend -- Jeffrey Epstein. The critique is profoundly misplaced, supported neither by the law or the facts, nor by the structure of our constitutional republic. To the contrary, Jeffrey was subjected to an unprecedented federal intrusion into a quintessentially local criminal matter in south Florida. His offense to the social order -- involving sex for hire -- was entirely a matter entrusted to laws of the several States, not the federal government. His conduct -- a classic state offense --was being treated exactly that way by able, honest prosecutors in Palm Beach County, but the overweening federal government intruded where it did not belong. And now, over ten years after the fact, the current assault on federal decision-makers at the time, including now-Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta (then the United States Attorney in south Florida), condemns the federal authorities for not going far enough.\n\nThe critics are entirely wrong. Neither the facts nor the law support the misguided criticisms being leveled by journalists and politicians at federal officials from over a decade ago -- including the highest levels of the Justice Department in Washington, D.C. .\n\nHere are the key facts: Jeffrey Epstein, a successful self-made businessman with no prior criminal history whatever, engaged in illegal conduct that amounts to solicitation of prostitution. That was wrong, and it was reasonably viewed as a violation of Florida state law. Although no coercion, violence, alcohol, drugs and the like were involved, the unsavory facts were carefully assessed by experienced state prosecutors who aggressively enforce state criminal laws. No one turned a blind eye to potential offenses to the public order. To the contrary, the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office conducted an extensive 15-month investigation, led by the chief of the Sex Crimes Division. Mr. Epstein was then indicted by a state grand jury on a single felony count of solicitation of prostitution.\n\nDuring that intense investigation, the state prosecutors extensively gathered and analyzed the evidence, met face-to-face with many of the asserted victims, considered their credibility -- or lack thereof -- and considered"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thoughts."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "12/15/2018 5:03:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Seems very good. Is there reason or opportunity here to evoke JE's Clinton connection? He had been publicly connected to the former President and became a proxy for the considerable anger at high levels of the Federal government that still surrounded Clinton. Likewise now, one reason to revive the story is that it is a way to tara Trump administration official, who, in the normal course of his duties, happened to deal with the case."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033428.txt_2649
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033428.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/5/2019 5:44:43 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.vox.com/2019/2/5/18211600/trump-inauguration-investigation-subpoena-sdny"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030399.txt_2650
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030399.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie SpineIla"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 6:31:20 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/20 1 8/0 1 /michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029891.txt_2651
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029891.txt
subject: RE: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jacquie Johnson [jacquie.johnson@domain]", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — Great thank you. Do you have your Stays signed yet?"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell [jessica.cadwell@domain]", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:20 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — I need a date for the deposition of Mr. Epstein. Can you provide me with one please?"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson [jacquie.johnson@domain]", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:47 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — I didnt forget about this...\nStill working on it."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell [jessica.cadwell@domain]", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo PTT ; oir forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson [jacquie.johnson@domain]", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030616.txt_2653
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030616.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 19 2009 11:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida money manager who once roamed in the same social circle as Bill Clinton, Prince \nAndrew and other high profile figures, is going to be released from prison early, a source tells \nRadarOnline.com. \nEpstein pleaded guilty last year to procuring teen girls for prostitution, ending his lifestyle with the rich and \nfamous in a Palm Beach, Florida scandal that reverberated through high-profile society. He received an 18-\nmonth sentence and was slated to be incarcerated until the end of this year. \nBut now, says the source, the jail door is about to swing open because Epstein has been secretly helping the feds \nunravel a suspected Ponzi scheme. He had inside knowledge of the scheme because he was one of its victims, \nlosing $67 million. \nThe source says it's all tied to the indictment of former managers of Bear Stearns Mortgage Investment Fund, and \nin that case Epstein is the person who is identified only as Victim # 1. \nMeanwhile, Epstein's life behind bars hasn't been too rough — in fact he's allowed to spend most days at his \nattorney's office. He was supposedly working on a charity venture but the source says he was actually busy \nhelping the feds with the Ponzi scheme. One source says that he's been guarded by men in suits with \nearphones. \nWell if those suits are going to follow him when he's freed they better pack bathing suits. Epstein owns Little St. \nJames Island in the Virgin Islands."}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:51 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Can you cut and paste and email to my blackberry...I can't open this up. Peg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Fri Jun 19 16:17:18 2009", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.radaronline.com/category/tags/jeffrey-epstein \nHELP ; a reporter for the ny times wants to write the following; Epsteins lawyers were contacted and they said they had no comment.. We \nhave checked with some of the worlds financial experts ,both in and out of govt , the consensus is that if Epstein is cooperating with the \nfeds the average intelligence of the u.s. government , just went up dramatically."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022443.txt_2656
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022443.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis TS", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/21/2016 2:28:39 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Jeffrey — | told u weeks ago that Davis would issue a report critical of Leon and board read article in Post business page\nre Davis Report and Caesars — and DJT will be President -- Nick"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026074.txt_2658
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026074.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:59 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "nathan myrhvold. suggested you use him as a refrence for masa. on another note. lots of investigations going slow as no one to lead , but when the justice dept staff gets filled. OY."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, April 21 2017 05:10 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Will give that a try. Bill Gates would carry more of a punch:) Saw Mnuchin/Cohn in DC --they are talking a big game but I don't know if they can deliver on tax reform. What do you think? I don't know why Trump does not reach out to Schumer -- two outer borough guys who know each other and can talk to each other. He has to move away from the right wing nutters back to the middle which is his natural space anyway."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032671.txt_2662
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032671.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, December 11, 2017 9:12 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-smear-c/"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 3:43:25 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Weird connections....i know glenn simpson very well....more to be said about that when | see you"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023314.txt_2664
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023314.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "josh's arrival cut short our needed conversation. I understand we have a difference of opinion. friends sometimes disagree, I shook on the 20 so you have no further obligation, none, I am willing to have brad karp hear both sides. as my view , you andi had an agreement. on phaidon /publishing, and then a long standing what you say is 28 , which is correct AFTer TAX. , 37 pre. . that was our numbers. I was clear what i thought the transactions were worth. far less than full. alanetc. , had you saidi will pay you only 20. i would have said ill pass. you never told me that 50-60 the number that i put on the table at the very beginning was not right. you asked that i lay out my plan step by step. and what i believe would have been the fair thing to do is say to me, I will pay you only 20if you do asiask, not tell me for the first time only after i laid it all out. had it not been you, 1 would have required payment in escrow. BEFORE fyithe reason I sent you an invoice so that if you decided that you wanted me to continue this year . it would be applied to last years income. I think today was a beginiing for you. Iam glad I will meet wendy the 23, rd, . separate and aprt from being your sounding board for personal issues, I do not see my involvment moving forward."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella PO"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:56 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "this was sent four months ago, nothing has changed sent oct 15. before big transaction.\n\nOffice, - adagoes. , hire heather a paralegal. Joslin goes or is closely managed by new cfo with tax experience. .castrucii goes asap.as he merely adds to mess.( too many people , ex 7 people or more to pay a bill ) eva goes. outsource as much as possible.. bookkeeping systems built from scratch, airplane restructure, boat . same, new grats. phaidon sale , decide on artspace survivability, regan, . do the kids really want these? , children accounting ie bens house.etc. re do estate for new facts. redo loans, trading accounts activity, . gaming -foreign- disclosures. . BRH TRA re thinks . household and construction architects. . redone. art partnership , choice of paintings. . re do structure of consultants. tax re family office. . decide if investments are a realistic option in the next three years.. insurance. operations. airplane , etc. . artfoundation , private. max charity contributions. financial reports. still waiting. ? on line banking, . tax planning, family office deductions ( profit center ). airplane certificate, redone jet aviation redo. . _— paper gigi ( E )trust to avoid gift tax. ."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:31 AM", "subject": "ask alan why he hasnt explained this to you since novmebr", "body": "Tenancy in common is a type of shared ownership of property, where each owner owns a share of the property. Unlike in a joint tenancy, these shares can be of unequal size, and can be freely transfered to other owners both during life and via a will. Even if owners own unequal shares, however, all owners have the right to occupy and use all of the property."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033209.txt_2669
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033209.txt
subject: Fwd: Cavett's guilt and horror..
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groft", "recipients": ["Jefffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/20/2016 10:33:15 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Cavett's guilt and horror..", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Dick Cavett <dickcavett@example.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley"], "timestamp": "December 20, 2016 at 5:26:17 PM EST", "subject": "Cavett's guilt and horror..", "body": "Dear Lesley,\n\nHORRORS!\n\nI have committed the (to me) unpardonable error of inflicting upon Jeffrie -- today on the phone - a false anagram. Please spare him the pain of passing it on in its erroneous form.\n\nHere is the correct version:\n\nThe letters in PRESIDENT TRUMP -- re-arranged -- spell: MR. PUTIN'S RED PET.\n\nThanks, Lesley. The chicken matter touches my heart. Dick C."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016671.txt_2672
source_file: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016671.txt
subject: Fw: WPB/NYC Water Quality Data
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Hanks/WESTPALM", "recipients": ["Eduardo Balbis/WESTPALM@WESTPALM"], "timestamp": "12/03/2008 10:33 AM", "subject": "WPB/NYC Water Quality Data", "body": "Please let know if you want any changes made. NCY produces 1.1 billion mgd per day.\n\nBelow is what they say about their treatment process:\n\nWater Treatment\n\nAll surface water and groundwater entering New York\nCity’s distribution system is treated with chlorine, fluoride,\nfood grade phosphoric acid and, in some cases, sodium\nhydroxide. New York City uses chlorine to meet the New\nYork State Sanitary Code and federal Safe Drinking Water\nAct (SDWA) disinfection requirements. Fluoride, at a\nconcentration of one part per million, is added to help\nprevent tooth decay and has been added since 1966 in\naccordance with the New York City Health Code. Phosphoric\nacid 1s added to create a protective film on pipes that\nreduces the release of metals such as lead from household\nplumbing. Sodium hydroxide is added to Catskill/Delaware\nwater to raise the pH and reduce corrosivity."}, {"sender": "EBalbis@wpb.org", "recipients": ["SHannah@TownofPalmBeach.com"], "timestamp": "12/03/2008 01:26 PM", "subject": "Fw: WPB/NYC Water Quality Data", "body": "Sarah,\n\nWe have obtained information about the water supply in NYC as requested. Note that the City of NY\nproduces about 33 times the amount of water than the City of West Palm Beach. We tried to compile\ndata that can be comparable. However, NYC act as their own State agency and track different\nparameters than the State of Florida. See below for additional information."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026229.txt_2676
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026229.txt
subject: Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:38 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Jeffrey —\n\nSounds good. Thanks so much for confirming. If you or someone in your office could provide the information below, I can send along an invoice and contribution letter for your $10K donation toward the chairs.\n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable):\nCONTACT NAME:\nADDRESS LINE 1:\nADDRESS LINE 2:\n\nMany thanks.\n\nBest,\nSteven"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "just send to peggy. youherco. its better for her"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028972.txt_2677
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028972.txt
subject: Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jack Goldberger", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Alan M. Dershowitz", "Roy Black"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:59:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 28, 2016, at 12:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["a"], "timestamp": "April 28, 2016 at 12:14:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sorry, the suit is attached to this email."}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["'Martin G. Weinberg'"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. we’re planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number is PY and I’m available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\nReuters News\n\nThomson Reuters"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026674.txt_2683
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026674.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/22/2017 5:46:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Plus: my senior Chinese friends tell me the top gave Trump the go ahead to take on North Korea.\nNo idea if it's real."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "22 Apr 2017, at 18:23", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When can I call you ?"}, {"sender": "David Stern <P>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When can I call you ?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030602.txt_2693
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030602.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but i am already getting sick of so many meetings!\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has some questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "No problem.\nI am meeting him as he has some questions. I do not need anything from him.\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 5:34 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Thank you!\nI heard that he is not that fun but i trust your judgement. It would be blast that you are here. I was just flirting with 22 years old hot blond blue eyes mexican chick. It turns out she is with her husband. Did not have chance to check him out. But as we concluded, anything good is rented;)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "hes great fun"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Just had mtg with Andrew. He is great.\nJee - i think that i would trade davos for a good fashion week. Much more fun."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 02:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "i understand the ratio of run to leap is way too high"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023328.txt_2707
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023328.txt
subject: new info
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brad S Ki clonic Spin! a", "leon"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:47 AM", "subject": "new info", "body": "brad, leon.\n\nAfter I spoke to you both, I excused myself from a dinner with some heads of state to walk into the bathroom to make some calls re 8865. I wondered whether any group that we could assert had control had filed in the past years. I called Fenn and he told me- yes.???!! he said that on friday , for the first time he learned that AGM was not delinquent at all. and had filed. !!| I asked why no one had ever told me or given me the purported justification for no filings in the past for the founders. and he said Well, sorry, it was discussed on fridays call. ? the calli was not on . not invited to ,the call wechsler didnt listen in and joslin didnt transmit ,ifitis true. Im also now told there is a note from Deloitte re 13 and 14 that says the founders DO NOT have to file. but fenn could not tell me who wrote it and said Deloitte says to ignore it. , that s why they are pushing now.\n\nsteps 1 8865 has many exemptions for filing. let see if we can find one . ( an elegant position might be josh and agm if he is panicked and leave us out ). The requirments are FACT specific , so without the facts we still have nothing. fenn said he has now put someone on it\n\n2 leon, I suggest need to focus on 1040 , 2015. , we may even consider filing the minimum 8865 , and wait until we are sure of our specific requirements, and file an amendment for 15 as well as past. no harm no foul"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinel: iii"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:34 PM", "subject": "new info", "body": "Leon, Iam on the verge of giving up. sorry. I cannot deal with the major incompetence of your family office. I have been vocal about change. you have made none. john castrucci, still involved ete. the bullshit corporate speak, of -our accounting dept , our bookeeping dept our finance dept, the comptroller . now gives me responses that --we have heard from Deloitte , I ask, who at Deloite?. -- dont know , the new team at Deloite says the old team was wrong ! what new team? what old team? -- dont know. . Pwe agrees who at"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032285.txt_2713
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032285.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:07:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032393.txt_2716
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032393.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Viet Lesley Croft is"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 15, 2016 11:16 am", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wont leave until 8 pm torow"}, {"sender": "Lvjet", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 4:29:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "message received,,, not before 8pm very good\n\nNOTE,.\n\nUPdated President Elect schedule:\n\nTrump Plane to arrive Orlando at 5pm friday for event,. then arrive Palm Beach estimate 10pm,. He usually runs late, so\n11pm could be realistic time for his PBI Arrival,.\n\n***the airport only shuts down for 20 min before and after his arrival,.\n\nI'll keep you posted if time changes,.\n\nthx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033235.txt_2725
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033235.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/9/2017 9:22:35 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://www.mansionglobal.com/articles/61984-trump-looking-to-unload-caribbean-beach-estate?link=TD_marketwatch home _page.83461b39d1bfc251&utm_source=marketwatch home _page.83461b39d1bfce251&utm campaign=circular&utm medium=MANSIONGLOBALS&locale="}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030584.txt_2726
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030584.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:28 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes- on-new-\nyorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell. html\n>\n\nby Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky- ward>\n\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“T’ve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been. You will\nnever think the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at\nthe moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of\nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations\nthat he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have\nzeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his\nold pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that focused\non his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the\nchairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is\ncurrently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with\nwhom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the issue that\nremains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on\nthe intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And\ntheir stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about\nEpstein and Maxwell. Whois he? And the British, especially, want to know: Whois she? At this point, Iam so bored\nof repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight\n—that I have decided to write about this myself."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 08:58 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "What is this??? When this will stop. This is crazy.\nAnd you are NOT 57;)\n\nAnd certainly you are NOT socially awkward.\nWho is that idiot.\n\nBoris"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025233.txt_2744
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025233.txt
subject: Approach Summary
messages:
  [{"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Picasso Overview_pdf.html", "Untitled attachment 63876.htm", "RepDef-Process-Deck_pdf.html", "Untitled attachment 63879.htm", "company-overview_pdf.html", "Untitled attachment 63882.htm"], "timestamp": "Friday, December 16 2011 06:41 PM", "subject": "Approach Summary", "body": "Attachments: \n1. Optimizing good information to push down the negative: using new content (blog, \nwebsites, press releases, public network profiles, google images, etc) and search engine \noptimization. Changing the Wikipedia profile. Notes Wikipedia below. \n2. Eliminating the bad information using prevalence and proprietary algorithms; redirecting \nthe way in which Google sequences your information (reassociating it with the positive \ncontent). This is called off-page optimization. \n3. Eliminating personal information (social sec, tel #'s, dob, addresses etc) from all public \nand private directories. \nCOMMENTS:  \nStep 2 is critical otherwise one is just bailing water from an ongoing flood of negative press. By \nrealigning the algorithms (i.e. reinforcing positive associations with your name and weakening the \nnegative associations), one almost permanently seals up the water hole or at least closes it \nsignificantly. This allows for Step 1 to be a onetime project (which will take 2 to 4 months approx.), \nwith just tweaking here and there down the road with updated content. \nBEST PEOPLE TO USE:  \nYou need people who eat, drink and sleep algorithms and search engine optimization. I've \nresearched several companies and the most skilled, discrete, award winning and comprehensive is \na company called, www.reputation.com based in Silicon Valley. See their attached docs for review. \nBelow are bulleted key points on them: \nLookup Page just creates web pages and will not solve your problem. \nI would serve as a liaison between you and Reputation. I would monitor their progress and provide \nthem with all positive content that they need. They would make sure that the content has maximum \nalgorithmic potential. You could keep your positive content simple (using you Edge.org summary \nwhich is good), or expand your content with updates on current science work and scientists. The \nbenefit of the former, is that it keeps you more anonymous. The benefit of the latter is that is \nalgorithmically associates you to a larger pool of known scientists, further pushing up positive \ncontent. My advice would be to combine the two: a simple repetitive bio summary of you but with a \nlarger list of scientists added on. But I would ask the Reputation team about this: saying that the \nmain goal is to enhance anonymity and algorithmic associations at the same time. \nWHY REPUTATION ftr  no particular order)  \n• Represents numerous fortune 500 companies \n• clients in more than 100 countries \n• based in Silicon Valley \n• Featured on CNN, WSJ, Forbes, NY Times etc \n• Undisputed world leader in online reputation management \n• Prevalence and proprietary algorithms to drive positive search results to the top. \n• Intimate knowledge of search engine optimization. \n• 200+ employees \n• Patented Internet technology \n• Partnered with: American Medical Assoc. Am Bar Assoc, Aol, etc \n• $67 million in venture capital to date. \n• CEO is Michael Fertik \nCEO and Founder \nMichael Fertik founded Reputation.com in 2006 \nwith the belief that people have the right to control \nand protect their online reputation and privacy. In \naddition to his work with Reputation.com, Michael \nholds a position on the advisory board of The Internet \nKeepsafe Coalition (iKeepSafe), a nonprofit that \nworks to protect the health and safety of youth online. \nMichael is regarded as one of the earliest pioneers of \nonline reputation management and a leading expert \non issues of online privacy. He co-authored the book \nWild West 2.0 and lectures internationally, appearing \nbefore professional and academic audiences. Michael \nalso advises school administrators and parent groups. \nPrior to founding Reputation.com, Michael clerked for \nChief Judge Danny J. Boggs of the Sixth Circuit Court \nof Appeals of the United States. He is a graduate of \nHarvard College and Harvard Law School, speaks \nseveral languages, and enjoys sailing, reading, and \nrunning. \nTIME FRAME & FEES \nTheir \"Picasso\" Tech services described in step 2, will take approx. 3 months to eliminate bad press from the \n1st and 2'd page. The whole process will take about a year to be solidified. Fees will be approx. $10k -$15k \nper month but depends on each case and costs can be kept down by providing content and selecting only \ntruly necessary services. \nWIKIPEDIA \nThis is a tough nut to crack. And I need to do more research on this. Wiki comes up first on the \nGoogle list due to its powerful domain and contains totally lopsided and damning content on you. \nBut we'll crack it. On the surface, Wiki is controlled by a morass of copyediting geeks who have \nnothing better to do than to discuss reference tags etc. It is also 'the people's' encyclopedia, \ndictated by the tyranny of the majority—so no objectivity at all. \nCurrent Strategy— 1. The Reputation group have a copyright team dedicated to balancing the \ncontent on Wikipedia and gradually sectioning the bad stuff down to sub categories in the profile. \nThey don't seem to be able to eliminate the bad though. 2. So, I think it's worth seeing how people \nlike Prince Andrew managed to create an absolutely stellar profile—or Bill Clinton for that matter. \nNo mention of his impeachment or lying to the Grand Jury. It barely touches on Lewinsky etc. 3. \nThere are also protected pages on Wiki but I need more time and research. \nWEBSITE  \nYou need to update your website immediately by adding the bio on you from The Edge if you can \nand adding a longer summary of science and scientists that you are/have worked with."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031246.txt_2748
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031246.txt
subject: Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peter Aldhous", "recipients": ["Dr. Krauss"], "timestamp": "December 10, 2017 at 5:12:27 PM PST", "subject": "URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Dr. Krauss:\n\nAs you know, I'm a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations against you. As we've already discussed by email, I'd very much like to interview you about these allegations in detail.\n\nIn particular, you stated in an email sent on Nov 13 that two universities had investigated an incident (# 6 below). You claimed that \"both Universities independently concluded that the report was unsubstantiated and fabricated with malicious intent.\" We are not aware that either university concluded fabrication or malicious intent, so if you have evidence to support this assertion, we would like to see and discuss it.\n\nThe story concerns your actions towards students while a professor of physics at Case Western Reserve University, as well as your conduct in non-academic settings as a prominent figure in the skeptics movement. I am reporting this story along with two of my colleagues on the science desk, Azeen Ghorayshi and Virginia Hughes.\n\nOur story is about several allegations of sexual misconduct dating from 2006 to 2016 (see full details below). Our reporting also goes into how the various institutions you have been affiliated with — Case Western, Arizona State University, the Australian National University, the New College of the Humanities, and the Center for Inquiry, for which you serve as an honorary member of the board of directors — have handled complaints and concerns about your behavior during this time.\n\nOur story is corroborated by emails, university documents, official complaints, testimony from victims and eyewitnesses, and interviews with more than two dozen of your current and former academic colleagues, students, and peers in the skeptics movement.\n\nI wanted to offer you the opportunity to comment and/or respond to the main facts we plan to publish. If you wish to comment on any of the below findings, we need to hear from you as soon as possible. We are planning on publishing our story Tuesday morning, Eastern US Time.\n\nBased on our reporting, this is what we plan to publish:\n\nIncident 1:\n• In November of 2006, at an event launching the new Center for Inquiry in Washington D.C., you met a volunteer for CFI D.C.\n• At the event, you asked for her business card. Later, you followed her as she was leaving and asked her if she was \"of age.\"\n• Later, you emailed her to invite her to dinner.\n• You planned to dine with her in the restaurant at the Washington D.C. hotel where you were staying.\n• You told her to come up to your room first because you needed to finish some work.\n• In your hotel room, you seemed in no rush to leave. You ordered a cheese plate, and later champagne, despite her suggestion that you go down to dinner.\n• You then made a comment about her eye makeup, getting very close to her face.\n• You then lifted her by her arms, and pushed her onto the bed beneath you, forcibly kissing her and trying to pull down the crotch of her tights.\n• She struggled to push you off her.\n• You said, \"When I was in college I could never get a girl that looked like you.\"\n• When you pulled out a condom, she got out from under you. She said \"I have to go,\" and rushed out of the room.\n\nIncident 2:\n• In an incident that occurred in fall of 2007 while you were a physics professor at Case Western Reserve University, a student tried to talk to you about her plans after graduation. You mentioned to her how tough it must be to have all the other physics majors asking her out on dates.\n• In a second incident in December of 2007, while you were still at Case Western, the same student visited your office to interview you for a student science journal. You closed the door behind her, and ignored the questions she had prepared. Then you made a casual comment about taking her out for dinner.\n• Later, in a regular column for the school paper, she described her experiences with you, without mentioning you by name. \"There was even one particular creep of a professor who once told me he thought differently of me compared to other students and asked me to dinner: a situation so disturbing that it left me upset for weeks afterward,\" she wrote.\n• She was then approached by a dean at the university, who suspected that she was referring to you, based on a previously reported incident with another student. He encouraged her to make a complaint, and she did.\n• University investigators interviewed both you and the student.\n• On September 4, 2008, Susan Nickel-Schindewolf, the university's associate vice president for student affairs, wrote to the student, telling her that the investigation was complete. She wrote that you had been told: \"This type of behavior could constitute sexual harassment in violation of the university's sexual harassment policy.\n• The letter also stated that you were prohibited from making contact with the student as long as she remained at Case.\n• The letter also stated that you are required to get approval from the dean or the chair of the physics department before setting foot on the campus again.\n• The letter also stated, \"Dr. Krauss expressed regret about having a negative impact on you, and also his willingness to use this complaint as an opportunity to reflect and improve on his future interactions with students.\"\n• By then, you had already left Case, taking up your current position at Arizona State University the month before.\n• \"The opportunities being offered at ASU are simply too great to turn down at this stage in my career,\" you told Case colleagues, in an email announcing your departure on April 16, 2008.\n\nIncident 3:\n• A former Case Western physics department administrator confirmed that she had reported a previous incident involving a student who had confided in her about your inappropriate behavior towards her.\n\nIncident 4:\n• You met a student from another university, an atheist activist, in March 2008 at the American Atheists Convention in Minneapolis. She wanted to expand the atheist group she ran at the midwestern university she was attending, and hoped to convince you to come and speak. You initially seemed enthusiastic.\n• During the convention, attendees including you and Richard Dawkins went for dinner with the student and volunteers for Dawkins' foundation.\n• Afterwards, the student invited you to join the volunteers for a drink.\n• You asked her to come get you in your hotel room. She was wary of your intentions, and so brought a male friend with her. Opening the door to find them both there, you informed her you had decided not to go.\n• You met this student again at the American Atheists Convention in Des Moines, Iowa, in April 2011.\n• You pulled over a chair for her in the bar, and then started running your hand up her leg under the table.\n• She tried to shift her body away from you, and you persisted in putting your hand on her leg. She crossed her legs, and you kept trying. Then she turned her entire body away.\n\nIncident 5:\n• This incident allegedly occurred on in May 2011 on a CFI cruise. We understand that CFI staff were informed that you had propositioned a female cruise-goer, who rejected an invitation to join you and your female companion for sex in your cabin.\n• At least two CFI staffers were sufficiently concerned about reports of your behavior that they urged CFI's president not to invite you on a 2014 cruise of the Galapagos Islands. You were invited on that cruise, however.\n\nIncident 6:\n• During a visit to Melbourne, Australia, in November 2016, you were accused of sexual misconduct once again.\n• The incident happened at a dinner held at the Melbourne Zoo as part of the Australian Skeptics National Convention, where you were a featured speaker.\n• With conference delegates chatting over drinks, a woman asked you for a celebrity selfie.\n• As the woman held out her phone to take the picture, you reached over her shoulder and grabbed her right breast.\n• She immediately reacted, bodychecking you and spinning around. \"Don't do that,\" she said.\n• BuzzFeed News has seen the complaint made by another woman to ASU, ANU, and the New College of the Humanities in London, including the selfie, her face obscured to conceal her identity. It shows your hand in motion as a blur in front of her shoulder, apparently moving toward her chest. Two other eyewitnesses have confirmed the complainant's account of what happened.\n• In April 2017, the complainant described the incident on her blog. After hearing more about your reputation for inappropriate behavior from blog readers, she decided to file a complaint about the Nov. 2016 incident.\n• On July 16, she filed formal complaints with Arizona State University, and with the Australian National University in Canberra and the New College of the Humanities in London, where you have visiting appointments.\n• Both Arizona State and the Australian National University told her they would look into the matter. But neither university found against you.\n• \"Based on the material available to the University, we do not have sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations,\" Kiaran Kirk, dean of the College of Science at the Australian National University, wrote to her.\n• Erin Ellison, who heads Arizona State's Office of Equity & Inclusion, wrote to her explaining that an inquiry \"did not find a violation of university policy.\"\n• In October, Arizona State denied a request from BuzzFeed News for documents relating to complaints of sexual harassment against you. However, Cynthia Jewett, the university's senior associate general counsel, noted that two individuals, neither affiliated with the university, had complained about you. \"The University did not find either communication to state a credible allegation,\" Jewett wrote.\n\nMiscellaneous facts:\n• In 2008, you founded the Origins Project at Arizona State University in Tempe, a multidisciplinary effort to understand the origins of the universe, life, and social systems. You have led that effort ever since.\n• Thanks to best-selling books like The Physics of Star Trek and A Universe From Nothing, frequent essays in publications including the New Yorker and the New York Times, and the documentary you made with biologist Richard Dawkins, called The Unbelievers, you are celebrated as one of America's leading public intellectuals.\n• You served on the science policy committee for Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign and are a vocal critic of President Donald Trump.\n• You also make regular public appearances across the world, often at gatherings of skeptics and atheists.\n• At CSICon in Las Vegas in October, a few dozen fans paid $500 per head to attend a VIP luncheon with you and Dawkins.\n• Many more lined up to get you to sign their copy of your latest book, The Greatest Story Ever Told — So Far.\n• Online, people can buy T-shirts emblazoned \"Lawrence Krauss for President.\"\n• In talks and interviews, you have argued that our universe arose without divine intervention, that religion drives xenophobia, and that our brains are hardwired to believe.\n• You have stated that science provides answers to many of life's biggest questions, and can even fix great societal injustices.\n• Earlier this year, at a Q&A event to promote your new book, the conversation came around to the dearth of women and minorities in science. \"Science itself overcomes misogyny and prejudice and bias,\" you said. \"It's built in: Questioning yourself, always questioning results, questioning others, relying on empirical evidence.\"\n• You have clashed with some skeptics over your defense of Jeffrey Epstein, a billionaire financier who in 2008 was convicted for soliciting prostitution from underage girls, and spent 13 months in a Florida jail.\n• Through his private foundation, Epstein has funded the work of several prominent scientists. He has provided funding for your Origins Project, supporting lectureship and scholarship programs, most recently pledging $100,000 in 2014.\n• In April 2011, you told the Daily Beast: \"As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.\"\n• In a blog comment about the Epstein controversy, you wrote: \"I remain skeptical, and I support a man whose character I believe I know.. .If you want to condemn me for that, so be it.\"\n• You were made an honorary member of CFI's board of directors in December 2011.\n• A blog post published in August 2013 described incidents #1 and #4, naming you. Another post, published at around the same time, described incident #5.\n• The first post was edited to remove your name after you had commented that the allegations of assault were \"potentially illegal.\" The second post was quickly taken down.\n\nAgain, if you wish to comment on or clarify any of these points, please get in touch with us as soon as possible. If I do not respond immediately it is because I am on another call, so please leave the best phone number to reach you.\n\nThanks,"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Nancy Portland"], "timestamp": "Dec 10, 2017, at 9:53 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "First draft:\nIt is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements on your part. Needless to say, I treat people I interact with with respect, and I work hard to support and mentor students, colleagues, and members of the general public. I do not sexually harass people. If the purpose of your reporting is to somehow argue that that Universities and other institutions are lax in dealing with well known individuals like myself, then in fact the situation is quite the opposite. My high public profile opens me up to more scrutiny at these institutions, not less, and it also opens me up to a host of outside complaints and allegations that other faculty do not receive, each of which the University has to respond to. The fact that I have remained a professor in all Universities with which I have been associated, in good standing, and also an officer or an invited speaker at organizations like CFI, which have strict harassment policies, is a confirmation of the fact that they trust my behavior. I was asked to be an honorary director of CFI, and invited to their last 3 meetings to speak, specifically because, as they have written me after the fact, the attendees universally appreciated my talks, my courtesy, and graciousness in spending time with the attendees. If the purpose of your report is to impugn my integrity or suggest I have a history of harassment, that too is false. As noted in one of your 'miscellaneous facts', as a scientist I try and remain skeptical, and rely on empirical evidence, rather than allegations and innuendo. I also try and judge the facts in context. The fact that Universities and other organizations employ me or have me on their boards, or invite me to meetings is because they value my contributions and my actions.\nYour specific allegations are false or distorted. Item 1 refers to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in 2006 where we mutually decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be appropriate, and had respectful encounters afterwards. I cannot comment on item 3, which involves an anonymous 3rd party claim, because I know nothing about it, and it was not taken seriously enough to result in any university action. Item 4 is confusing. Are you saying that because I decided I didn't want to go out to a bar with a group of attendees that I was harassing them? The second part is false. I don't do that. Re incident 5: The 'female companion' in this case is my wife, who can attest to the fact that the claim is false, which is what I wrote in response to the blog in question, causing it to be taken down.\nIt is worthwhile responding to Item 2 and 6 in more detail,\nRe item 2: the student in question was interested in science communication, and on dozens of occasions came to me or wrote to me with questions. When she asked about advice for after graduation I DID tell her she was different than the other students in her year. The rest of them were interested in going on to graduate school, but she was interested in science communication so I told her that she might want to take a different path. Since she was the only woman in her year, as I recall, I did ask her on one of these occasions if that made it difficult for her in any way. I asked, because as a faculty member I was interested, and also because as someone she had asked for career advice from I wanted to know if that made a difference to her. Re asking her for dinner.. I have gone back over emails from that period. I have numerous requests from her to go for coffee to talk, which I usually had to turn down because I was busy, including several occasions where she asked me to have coffee with her off campus to talk, and I politely declined. I did let her accompany me off campus one time to watch me do a BBC interview because she specifically requested it. I did and do have coffee and meals with students on campus, and I see nothing wrong with this. I was shocked when I later learned of her complaint, not least because there was no inappropriate interaction and also because well after the date on which she is said to have been offended, she continued to email me with joking questions or comments, and at a AAAS conference in 2008, for which she had asked, and for which I had written her a letter of recommendation to attend, my wife and I gave her a lift well out out of our way to drop her off at her hotel, and I note in an email response to her email about the conference, agin in 2008, I expressed that I would pass her regards along to my wife and vice versa. When the University informed me of the complaint I was shocked and concerned. When I spoke to the human resources person, including relating my concerns and providing the emails in question, I was told that no formal complaint of sexual harassment was deemed to be warranted in this case, and that the young woman in question had agreed to that. By that time I learned of the complaint I had already announced my intentions to leave Case to accept an offer at ASU—a very difficult decision for me because of my long-standing attachment to the University, and the excellent relations I had with my colleagues there, both among the faculty and among the administration. Because I was already in Arizona at the time I was asked not to have any further interaction with the student I agreed to that request because it was basically moot. I was also told that because it was being handled informally, that (a) it should remain confidential, which I, at least abided by, and (b) if no further complaints were lodged in that case, that the University would remove the allegation from my record after 5 years, which makes me surprised that someone violated that written agreement with you.\nRe item 6: You report on ASU's response to item #6 , without including the fact that the University specifically stated there were never any allegations of sexual misconduct or harassment by me at the University, and the outside complaints were in fact related specifically to your item #6. Further you neglect to mention that this complaint was by an anonymous third party, not the individual who was allegedly harassed, who never lodged a complain, and that no specific evidence was provided of the alleged transgression. I was surprised and dismayed that both ASU and ANU launched investigations on the basis of this but was told by both Universities that because of my high profile even such unsubstantiated third party complaints at private events unrelated to the University would be investigated. The complaint was investigated throughly by both ASU and ANU and both came to the conclusion that it was not credible and no university policies had been violated. . In addition ANU's investigation, which took a full month found significant inconsistencies in the allegation, suggesting distortion and fabrication, I will quote from the ANU report. The initial complaint, which in fact resulted in a temporary suspension by ANU outlined the claim you made in the words you quoted in your note to me, along with the statement made in the complaint that \n\"It is the University's understanding that a complaint was lodged directly to the conference organisers at the time of the incident.\"\nAfter the investigation, the final report absolved me of any wrongdoing, and indicated information inconsistent with the original claim and apparent later claims as follows:\n\"The allegations were made by an observer to the incident.\n- The complaint did not identify, nor disclose the identity of the conference attendee who was allegedly touched in an unwelcome manner.\n- The conference attendee who took the selfie' photo did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers at the time of the incident (November 2016).\n- The conference attendee who witnessed the incident, did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers at the time of the incident (November 2016).\nThe photo submitted as part of the complaint does not provide evidence of any physical contact.\n- The complainant alleged that a photo exists, showing your hand on the breast of the conference attendee who took the selfie' photo. This photo was not made available to the Australian National University, although it was requested in the course of the investigation.\"\n(And for the record I often put my hand up in front of a camera if there is a flash, as I specifically request selfies not to include flashes, so that I don't end up with a series bright spots in front of my eyes for the next half hour)\nWhat makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that I get asked for literally thousands of selfies, and when people come up to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, and sometimes overly aggressive. I am particularly proud of the way I attempt to make all people feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated. Thus, this false claim strikes at the heart of what I am about, which is to acknowledge fans in a way that makes them feel appreciated. As I understand you had a reporter watching me sign books and take selfies at the CFI conference in Las Vegas this year, that behavior is what they will have witnessed. Moreover, I am proud of the interactions I have had at both Case and ASU, with students, colleagues and staff. I have had numerous female graduate students, postdocs, employees, and colleagues, and as ASU attested to you, none of these have ever complained of harassment. Quite the contrary in fact, as I have worked hard to support them, mentor them, and treat them with respect. I treat others as responsible adults, and I expect to be treated equally."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Nancy Portland"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 6:31:28 AM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Second Draft:\nI appreciate the opportunity to respond to your email. While I am running the risk that you will report my comments, if you do, either out of context, or incompletely, I am responding with an effort to be complete. It is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements on your part. I treat people I interact with with respect, and I work hard to support and mentor students, colleagues, and members of the general public. I do not sexually harass people. If the purpose of your reporting is to somehow argue that Universities and other institutions are lax in dealing with well known individuals like myself, then in fact the situation is quite the opposite. My high public profile opens me up to more scrutiny at these institutions, not less, and it also opens me up to a host of outside complaints and allegations that other faculty do not receive, each of which the University has to respond to. The fact that I have remained a professor in all Universities with which I have been associated, in good standing, and also an officer or an invited speaker at organizations like CFI, which have strict harassment policies, is a confirmation of the fact that they trust my behavior. I was asked to be an honorary director of CFI, and invited to their last 3 meetings to speak, specifically because, as they have written me after the fact, the attendees universally appreciated my talks, my courtesy, and graciousness in spending time with the attendees. If the purpose of your report is to impugn my integrity or suggest I have a history of harassment, that too is false. As noted in one of your 'miscellaneous facts', as a scientist I try and remain skeptical, and rely on empirical evidence, rather than allegations and innuendo. I also try and judge the facts in context. The fact that Universities and other organizations employ me or have me on their boards, or invite me to meetings is because they value my contributions and my actions.\nThe items you list are false or distorted. Item 1 refers to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in 2006 where we mutually decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be appropriate, and there were respectful and platonic encounters afterwards. There is nothing to comment on in item 3, which involves an anonymous 3rd party claim because I know nothing about it, there are no details provided, and it clearly was not taken seriously enough to result in any university action. Item 4 is confusing. Are you saying that because I decided I didn't want to go out to a bar with a group of attendees that I was harassing them? The second part did not happen. Re incident 5: The 'female companion' in this case is my wife, who can attest to the fact that the claim is false, which is what I wrote at the time in response to the blog in question, causing it to be taken down.\nIt is worth responding to Item 2 and 6 in more detail,\nRe item 2: the student in question was interested in science communication, and on dozens of occasions came to me or wrote to me with questions. When she asked about advice for after graduation I DID tell her she was different than the other students in her year. The rest of them were interested in going on to graduate school, but she was interested in science communication so I told her that she might want to take a different path. Since she was the only woman in her year, as I recall, I did ask her on one of these occasions if that made it difficult for her in any way. I asked, because as a faculty member I was interested in knowing what we could do, if necessary to encourage more women to go into physics, and also because as someone she had asked for career advice from I wanted to know if that made a difference to her. Re asking her for dinner.. I have gone back over emails from that period. I have numerous requests from her asking me to go for coffee to talk, which I usually had to turn down because I was busy, and on several occasions sh specifically asked me to have coffee with her off campus to talk, and I politely declined. I did let her accompany me off campus one time to watch me do a BBC interview because she specifically requested it. I did and do have coffee and meals with students on campus, and I see nothing wrong with this. I try to treat even students as respected colleagues if possible. I was shocked when I later learned of the complaint she was apparently asked to lodge to the University, not least because there was no inappropriate interaction and also because, well after the dates you listed on which she was apparently offended, she continued to email me with joking questions or comments. Also, at a later AAAS conference, again in 2008, for which she had asked, and for which I had written her a letter of recommendation to attend, my wife and I gave her a lift in our taxi well out of our way in order to drop her off at her hotel, and I note in an email response to her email about the conference, agin in 2008, I expressed that I would pass her regards along to my wife and vice versa. When the University later informed me of the complaint I was shocked and concerned. When I spoke to the human resources person, including relating my concerns and providing the emails in question, I was told that no formal complaint of sexual harassment was deemed at that time to be called for, and that the young woman in question had agreed to that. By that time I learned of the complaint I had already announced my intentions to leave Case to accept an offer at ASU—a very difficult decision for me because of my long-standing attachment to the University, and the excellent relations I had with my colleagues there, both among the faculty and among the administration. Because I was already in Arizona at the time I was asked not to have any further interaction with the student I agreed to that request, both to respect her sensitivities and also because it was basically moot because I was not on campus. I was also told that because it was being handled informally, that (a) it should remain confidential, which I, at least abided by, and (b) if no further complaints were lodged in that case, that the University would remove the complaint from my record after 5 years, which makes me surprised that someone violated that written agreement with you.\nRe item 6: You report on ASU's response to item #6 , without including the fact that the University specifically stated there were never any allegations of sexual misconduct or harassment by me at the University, and morever the outside complaints were in fact related specifically to your item #6. Further you neglect to mention that this complaint was by an anonymous third party, not the individual who was allegedly harassed, who never lodged a complain, and that no specific evidence was provided of the alleged transgression. I was surprised and dismayed that both ASU and ANU launched investigations on the basis of this but was told by both Universities that because of my high profile even such unsubstantiated third party complaints at private events unrelated to the University would be investigated. The complaint was investigated throughly by both ASU and ANU and both came to the conclusion that it was not credible and no university policies had been violated.. In addition ANU's investigation, which took a full month found significant inconsistencies in the allegation, suggesting distortion and fabrication, I will quote from the ANU report. The initial complaint, which in fact resulted in a temporary suspension of my position at ANU, until it was dismissed, outlined the claim you made in the words you quoted in your note to me, but it also stated \n\"It is the University's understanding that a complaint was lodged directly to the conference organisers at the time of the incident.\"\nAfter the month-long investigation, during which I was told I was not to interact with anyone on campus (again moot because I was a hemisphere removed) the final report absolved me of any wrongdoing, and indicated information inconsistent with the original claim and apparent later claims as follows in the report, from which I quote:\n\"The allegations were made by an observer to the incident.\n- The complaint did not identify, nor disclose the identity of the conference attendee who was allegedly touched in \nan unwelcome manner.\n- The conference attendee who took the `selfie' photo did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference \norganisers \nat the time of the incident (November 2016).\n- The conference attendee who witnessed the incident, did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference \norganisers \nat the time of the incident (November 2016).\nThe photo submitted as part of the complaint does not provide evidence of any physical contact.\n- The complainant alleged that a photo exists, showing your hand on the breast of the conference attendee who \ntook \nthe `selfie' photo. This photo was not made available to the Australian National University, although it was \nrequested \nin the course of the investigation.\"\n(And for the record I often put my hand up in front of a camera if there is a flash, as I specifically request selfies not to include flashes, so that I don't end up with a series bright spots in front of my eyes for the next half hour)\nWhat makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that I get asked for literally thousands of selfies, and when people come up to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, and sometimes overly aggressive. I am particularly proud of the way I attempt to make all people feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated. Thus, this false claim strikes at the heart of what I am about, which is to acknowledge fans in a way that makes them feel appreciated. As I understand you had a reporter watching me sign books and take selfies at the CFI conference in Las Vegas this year, that behavior is what they will have witnessed. Moreover, I am proud of the interactions I have had at both Case and ASU, with students, colleagues and staff of all genders and ethnicities. I have worked hard to support them, mentor them, and treat them with respect. I treat others as responsible adults, and I expect to be treated equally.\n\nLawrence M. Krauss\nDirector, The Origins Project at ASU\nCo-Director, Cosmology Initiative\nFoundation Professor\nSchool of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department\nArizona State University,P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032387.txt_2750
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032387.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "first you father was afraid of trump and the us. _, now he shold probaby move here. :)"}, {"sender": "Lang, Caroline <a>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/2/2016 12:41:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Excellent !\nCaroline Lang"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031798.txt_2760
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031798.txt
subject: Re: Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Schoen"], "timestamp": "11/29/2018 3:59:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal", "body": "yes, every outlet needs a sex story"}, {"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal", "body": "They try to keep this story going from every angle. Now dershowitz isn't involved; rather he is a high powered lawyer. I didn't know you also had lefkowitz. I met the guy once when a prospective client asked me to try a case with him. One meeting was enough for me to see clearly that that would not have worked out well; but he apparently is a successful lawyer. One thing for sure the article gets wrong - that the \"victims\" were silenced. Hope you are doing well."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032659.txt_2763
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032659.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/2/2017 4:52:49 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Trump in your neighborhood today. Looks like he is going to 740 Park for a fundraiser."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031103.txt_2775
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031103.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [reid.weingarten@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/6/2019 12:50:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have a hysterical wynn-trump issue that will make you laugh"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 6, 2019 8:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "dont know. __,. bannon for breakfast tomor. . everyone confused. markets strong."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 2:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Charged criminally in sdny...Lithuanian hottie...take it you don't know him...what's your headline?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 6, 2019 8:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Pb divorce? Fun"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 1:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "It is Todd kozel..."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 6, 2019 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I leave monday at 10 am breakfast?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 1:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Are you in nyc monday?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 6, 2019 3:41 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "where are you, im in ny on sunday."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033164.txt_2778
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033164.txt
subject: Eric Roth
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2015 8:00:21 PM", "subject": "Eric Roth", "body": "he appears to be looking for a response from me as i never replied to his email offering a 10,000 discount \nplease advise"}, {"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "March 24, 2015 at 2:12:01 PM EDT", "subject": "10:00pm Tonight - CNBC Feature", "body": "Hi Richard, \nHope all is well. \nShould you be bored this evening, we will be featured on CNBC's \"Secret Lives of The Super Rich\" showcasing our S-76 \nhelicopter refurbishment for Donald Trump — thought you might enjoy getting a glimpse of what we do."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028924.txt_2782
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028924.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2015, at 7:25 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "• bad press in fulll swing . she also claims to have dinner on my island with clinton. lots of details where he was sitting etc however he was NEVER on the island NEVER, its silly, but she has lots of traction"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2015 11:45:43 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Interesting.. Heard Alan is not the type to give up."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022977.txt_2787
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022977.txt
subject: | ONLY FORWARD THIS SO YO'RE AWARE OF ITS EXISTENCE--pk
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner [incomplete@domain]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/5/2017 3:19:21 PM", "subject": "| ONLY FORWARD THIS SO YO'RE AWARE OF ITS EXISTENCE--pk", "body": "i only forward this link so you’re aware of its existence..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012023.txt_2788
source_file: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012023.txt
subject: Jean Luc Brunel
messages:
  [{"sender": "Dr. Royce Jalazo <dynamicbeh@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["joetitone708@comcast.net"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, December 23, 2014 2:40:59 PM", "subject": "Jean Luc Brunel", "body": "Mr. Titone,\n\nPlease accept this email as my formal notification that Mr. Jean Luc Brunel attending an\noutpatient individual psychotherapy session with me on 12/12/14.\n\nThank you,\n\nRoyce N. Jalazo, Psy.D.\nLicensed Psychologist"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021823.txt_2790
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021823.txt
subject: Re: your statement?
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 20, 2015 2:19 AM", "subject": "Re: your statement?", "body": "Ha, the sequel comment is great. But I don't think it's my place to discuss her accusations of other people...I know nothing about it and never met her or Clinton.\nThe points I can legitimately address are the nature of my involvement with you and some smoking gun allegations by the other girls. I will talk to a lawyer this week.\n\nIt could really be fun if I made a viral video that showed how easily people can be fooled, followed by a statement saying the stories are obviously false. If it's fun, tabloids may cover it...\n\nBtw, I was invited to go to Davos...does not seem like such a good idea at the moment :)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, January 19, 2015 7:13 PM", "subject": "your statement?", "body": "I have to hand it to MD I'm sure she deserves the pretty penny she has made for her effort\n\nShe has certainly caught the imagination of a public hungry for salacious fiction. To suggest her story is anything other than that, a fiction , is ludicrous. Presidents at dinner on caribean islands. (clinton was never ever there, easy to confirm ). Sharing a bath with a Prince ( bathtub too small even for one adult ). sex slave being paid thousands of dollars. (while at the exact same time, she was working as a hostess in a burger bar ). being lent out to a prime minister though this prime mininster, never out of sight of his massive security detail also never visited the island, , sex ona small airplane with a famous lawyer while the other passengers must have been all looking out the window during the event . I would have thought that her fabrications were readilly apparent , but now , being asked to deny what the press has termed her\" allegations \" is frankly silly. ok, to play along I deny each and every allegation. The only person she didn't suggest she was forced to have sex with , was Bilbo Baggins. , maybe its in the sequel."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012037.txt_2791
source_file: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012037.txt
subject: Re: Press: AmLaw Litigation Daily on Emirates Bank win
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruennler"], "timestamp": "8/15/2016 12:09:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Press: AmLaw Litigation Daily on Emirates Bank win", "body": "Did you write this ?@"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, August 15, 2016", "subject": "FW: Press: AmLaw Litigation Daily on Emirates Bank win", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["#C-M EMIRATES NBD - LW_TEAM", "Cleaves, John"], "timestamp": "Monday, Aug 15, 2016, 12:57 AM", "subject": "FW: Press: AmLaw Litigation Daily on Emirates Bank win", "body": "AmLaw Daily story just posted. See below."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Dunlavey, Dean (OC)", "Mohebbi, Nima (A)", "Rucmmler, Kathy (DC)", "Seurcr, Steve (SF-BR)"], "timestamp": "Sunday, Aug 14, 2016, 9:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Press: AmLaw Litigation Daily on Emirates Bank win", "body": "See"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032378.txt_2798
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032378.txt
subject: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/25/2016 10:28:28 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nTrump is still scheduled to depart Sunday between 4 and 6pm,,\nLet me know if we are firm for wheels up Saturday at 6pm still?\n\nThx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033170.txt_2802
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033170.txt
subject: Donald Trump and the Looking-Glass War - SFGate
messages:
  [{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/27/2016 12:32:41 AM", "subject": "Donald Trump and the Looking-Glass War - SFGate", "body": "http://m.sfgate.com/opinion/chopra/article/Donald-Trump-and-the-Looking-Glass-War-9284330.php"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032436.txt_2807
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032436.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Alireza ITTIHADIEH", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/15/2017 1:49:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "People are just back and the activity really started this week. A lot of enquiries out of China and a lot of buyers\n\nin the US have resurfaced\n\nV-BR"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "15 Jan 2017, at 04:17", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is trading , now that trump has won. ?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032246.txt_2809
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032246.txt
subject: Re: Patterson
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <j eevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about:\n\nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience.\n\nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is about your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and perhaps some social media efforts.\n\nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and interests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive effort.\n\nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and Connolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that Patterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered before.\n\nMeanwhile--\n\nIn a lawyer's letter, I'd suggest including the following points--not necessarily legal, but a warning about how a press campaign might unfold (publishers are more worried about being caught in negative media controversy than they are of legal threats):\n\n1) Little, Brown has made on the record representations to at least one well-known journalist that it was not publishing a book by James Patterson about Jeffrey Epstein--possibly an effort to avoid inquiries about the questionable nature of the book;\n\n2) The actual author of the book, John Connolly, is someone other than the stated author, James Patterson. Connolly is known to have developed an obsession with Epstein, such that, his longtime employer, Vanity Fair, has refused to allow him to write about Epstein for the magazine;\n\n3) Sources have confirmed for us that Patterson has had little more than a minimal consulting role in the book, and that Connolly has functioned in every material way as the book's researcher and writer. We believe Patterson's \"authorship\" of the book will not stand up to scrutiny. And, indeed, that the entire notion of an extension of the Patterson franchise into nonfiction, as it has been used in fiction and children's book--effectively other authors writing under the Patterson name—presents a host of journalism ethical issues."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Mar 18, 2016, at 11:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 3:57:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031659.txt_2817
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031659.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 9:53:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "recall ive told you ,, -- 1 have met some very bad people ,, none as bad as trump. not one decent cell in his body.. so yes- dangerous"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 12:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "It's ok.\n\nHe didn't wreck world and avoided scandal.\n\nWhat does Ruemmler say re his attitude towards women?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 7, 2017, at 1:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man of the people\nhttp://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/02/07/president-barack-obama-kiteboards-horses-around-richard-branson-epic-vacation/97592260/"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes. In NYC actually."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 6, 2017, at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "speak today"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017590.txt_2821
source_file: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017590.txt
subject: Re: Fw: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Rich Beckler", "Ken Adams"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 1, 2017, 12:06:29 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Do you remember when I'd asked you what your daughters did for a living? Especially last night Mr. Beckler, as most Friday nights, no?\n\nYes, they are the new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell; for you Richard Beckler, this originated from my being a former Stone Ridge classmate of his elder daughter Katie Beckler, and because he was on the Board of Stone Ridge during this period in time when my every family, friend, acquaintance and association was being contacted, bribed in one form or another, and turned against me (see below); as for Ken Adams, it stemmed from my having contacted him for representation in my 2011- filed case against IBM also during this period of time when my every communication were being tracked.\n\nYou both are interesting; you let us see what's to become of the Scalia 35 (see below; at bottom, Ghislaine Maxwell's Jeffrey Epstein in context.)\n\n*\n\nWe start from this following precept: (the repeating 9/11s)"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Ainbanklaw Info", "Denyse Sabagh", "Michael Baxter", "Patrick M. Regan", "Robert Barnett", "Weingarten, Reid", "Ellen Kerns"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 1, 2017 12:49 PM", "subject": "Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "We know of course that Saturdays are reserved for Matthew Horton."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid Bo", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 6:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "7/4/2017 4:53:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026935.txt_2826
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026935.txt
subject: Trump's ex-lawyer Michael Cohen will testify at House Oversight Committee before entering prison
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2019 8:23:40 PM", "subject": "Trump's ex-lawyer Michael Cohen will testify at House Oversight Committee before entering prison", "body": "Importance: High \nhttps://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/10/ex-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-to-testify-to-house-oversight-committee.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032520.txt_2828
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032520.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "3/22/2017 12:25:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sorry.. all SHOW.. he is a fucking showman.. a carnival huckster.. this, and the military budget and health care \nare all show... no substance.. just the 'biggest ever'., for a guy with small hands.."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 22, 2017, at 4:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All shoe. This is not supporting science. It is all about the size of the rocket for him. All this will do is give him \nglory and not contribute to science."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 22, 2017, at 5:41 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/03/21/trump-signs-nasa-bill-aimed-at-\nlanding-on-mars/?utm term=.64eb9bf54e09"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031291.txt_2829
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031291.txt
subject: Duke Buchan III
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/18/2016 4:38:21 PM", "subject": "Duke Buchan III", "body": "This guy apparently is constantly texting Trump/Trump. Have you heard of him?\nhttp://hginvestors.com/?page id= 1 0"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032350.txt_2830
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032350.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 5:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra ay", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:14:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Did she also drop civil case against you ?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032534.txt_2836
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032534.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I am seeing a little bit I don't think it will turn into romance I am a bit old and not tall enough but she seems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship Commison it came through Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:19:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "careful she is nottrustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "a 2 timer?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 8, 2017, at 11:27 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "worse"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:30:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "We have not had sex"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032344.txt_2837
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032344.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "long dow , short yen euro and pound. long reits,"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You called it! How are you positioned re market?"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:10:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "who is treasury secretary? Is Mnuchin a done deal? Seems too obvious."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021096.txt_2838
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021096.txt
subject: Re: Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kia Kokalitcheva", "recipients": ["George Rose/Getty Images"], "timestamp": "February 21, 2018 at 7:32:17 AM PST", "subject": "Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21", "body": "Pro Rata\nBy Kia Kokalitcheva •Feb 21, 2018\n\nView in browser\n\nWelcome back, readers. Once again, a reminder to send me your delicious scoops and tips at kia@axios.com or find me on Twitter at @pinkialikethecar.\n\nHot event alert: RSVP to our 2/26 event in NYC for interviews with NBA star Draymond Green, BBG Ventures' Susan Lyne, JPMorgan's Jennifer Piepszak, and Equinox CEO Harvey Spevak.\n\nTop of the Morning\nIllustration: Rebecca Zisser / Axios\n\nAT&T's proposed $85 billion purchase of Time Warner took another turn yesterday. A federal judge hearing the Justice Department's lawsuit to block the deal denied a request by the telecom giant to disclose communications between Justice Department officials, including Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and the White House about the deal.\n\n• Why it matters: The ruling is a blow to AT&T's attempt to show that the lawsuit to block the deal is politically motivated by President Trump's antipathy for CNN, which Time Warner owns. AT&T says it wasn't asked to offload any assets as part of the deal until after Trump took office.\n\n• What they're saying: \"We respect the judge's decision and look forward to the upcoming trial,\" said Dan Petrocelli, who is leading AT&T and Time Warner's defense in the case, in a statement.\n\n• At a hearing on Friday, a Justice Department lawyer said that AT&T's argument for the documents \"didn't make sense.\"\n\n• Go deeper: Our report from the courtroom on Friday, when DOJ and AT&T presented their arguments.\n\nFund scoop: Niv Dror, who joined AngelList through its acquisition of Product Hunt in 2016, is raising a small early-stage fund focused on consumer products, multiple sources tell Axios. Dror declined to comment.\n\n• The fund will raise at least $1 million, though one source says it could go up to $2-3 million.\n\n• Like Product Hunt colleague Ryan Hoover's own VC fund, Dror's will be managed on the back-end by AngelList.\n\nSame old story: Yesterday, I grabbed coffee with Day One Ventures founder Masha Drokova, and heard a familiar—and still disappointing—story: While raising her fund, she was told by prospective investors that she should get a male co-founder.\n\n• She initially considered the suggestion, she told me, before remembering it's rooted in sexism.\n\nSoftbank $$$: Softbank's Vision Fund is in early talks to raise additional funds from Bahrain's sovereign wealth fund, Mumtalakat, the latter's CEO told Reuters.\n\n• The Persian Gulf has been a major source of funds for the Vision Fund: Public Investment Fund, Saudi Arabia's main sovereign wealth fund, and Abu Dhabi's Mubadala, are already investors.\n\n• And it's not the only one visiting the region's investors—funds focused on tokens and cryptocurrencies have also been fundraising in the area, I'm told.\n\nUnicorn stampede: We're not even two months into 2018 and yet, seven startups have already seen their private valuations cross the $1 billion mark—earning \"unicorn\" status—according to Pitchbook. Last year: 53. The word \"overvalued\" comes to mind...\n\nThe BFD\nPhoto: George Rose/Getty Images\n\nBroadcom has adjusted its takeover offer for Qualcomm to $79 per share, down from the its \"best and final\" bid of $82. The move is a response to Qualcomm's announcement yesterday it would pay $127.50 a share for NXP, up from the $110 it had offered.\n\n• Why it's the BFD: Broadcom and Qualcomm's takeover dance has taken a dramatic turn for what should have been a boring transaction between two chip companies.\n\n• Bottom line: \"Broadcom has long said its acquisition of the San Diego-based chipmaker is contingent on Qualcomm buying NXP at the previously agreed price, saving a large amount of cash Broadcom could hypothetically use for its own purposes once the acquisition goes through... Qualcomm raised its NXP bid to secure support from activist investors who have piled into NXP and demanded a higher sale price.\" — Bloomberg.\n\nVenture Capital Deals\n• Moovit, an Israeli maker of a transportation app, has raised $50 million in Series D funding led by Intel Capital, with participation from Sequoia, BMW iVentures, NGP, Sound Ventures, BRM, Gemini, Vaizra, Vintage, and Hanaco. http://axioslink/fQSW\n\n• Vectra, a San Jose, Calif.-based cybersecurity startup, has raised $36 million in Series D funding led by Atlantic Bridge, with participation from the Ireland Strategic Investment Fund, Nissho Electronics Corp., Khosla Ventures, Accel Partners, IA Ventures, AME Cloud Ventures, DAG Ventures and Wipro Ventures. www.vectra.ai\n\n• FourKites, a Chicago-based make of supply chain management software, has raised $35 million in Series B funding. August Capital led the round, with participation from Bain Capital Ventures and Hyde Park Venture Partners. http://axioslink/7XWI\n\n• DecaWave, an Irish fabless semiconductor company, has raised $30 million in funding led by Atlantic Bridge Ventures, with participation from the China Ireland Growth Technology Fund, ACT Venture Capital, and ZZ Ventures.\n\n• Kidaptiv, a Mountain View, Calif.-based maker of adaptive learning software, has raised $19.1 million in Series C funding led by Formation 8 and Korean education company Woongjin ThinkBig. http://axioslink/Fuut\n\n• Prophesee, a Paris-based machine vision startup, has raised $19 million in Series B funding led by an undisclosed investor, with participation from 360 Capital Partners, Supernova Invest, iBionext, Intel Capital, Renault Group, and Robert Bosch Venture Capital, according to Tech.eu. http://axioslink/QAyn\n\n• Greenlight Financial Technology, an Atlanta-based maker of a smart debit card for kids, teens, and college students, has raised $16 million in Series A funding led by TTV Capital with participation from New Enterprise Associates, Relay Ventures, SunTrust Bank, Ally Financial, nbkc bank, Canapi, and the Amazon Alexa Fund. www.greenlightcard.com\n\n• Zagster, a Cambridge, Mass.-based bike-share service, has raised $15 million in new funding led by Edison Capital Partners. www.zagster.com\n\n• Morphisec, and Israel-based cybersecurity startup, has raised $12 million in Series B funding from Orange Digital Ventures, Jerusalem Venture Partners, General Electric, and Deutsche Telekom. www.morphisec.com\n\n• Tunity, a New York-based live audio service for television content, has raised $12 million in Series A funding. Investors include former Morgan Stanley CEO John Mack and WeWork CEO Adam Neumann. www.tunity.com\n\n• Fever Labs, a New York-based maker of an event discovery app, has raised $11.7 million in new funding, according to an SEC filing. www.feverup.com\n\n• Gabi, a San Francisco-based insurance shopping services, has raised $9.5 million in Series A funding led by Canvas Ventures, with participation from Correlation Ventures, Northwestern Mutual Future Ventures, Securian Ventures, A.Capital Ventures and Project A. www.gabi.com\n\n• Dover Microsystems, a Waltham, Mass.-based cybersecurity company, has raised $6 million in seed funding. Hyperplane Venture Capital led the round with participation from Draper, Qualcomm Ventures and the Hub Angels Investment Group. www.dovermicrosystems.com\n\n• Anyfin, a Stockholm-based loan refinancing startup, has raised $5.9 million (€4.8 million) in Series A funding led by Accel and Northzone, with participation from Global Founders Capital and angel investors. http://axioslink/IpTj\n\n• Thirdpresence, a Helsinkin-based A.I. programmatic video advertising company, has raised $2.4 million in seed funding from Inventure, Tesi, and existing investors. www.thirdpresence.com\n\nPrivate Equity Deals\n• Rhone Capital agreed to buy Fogo de Chao (NASDAQ: FOGO), a Dallas-based Brazilian steakhouse chain, in a deal valued at $560 million. Credit Suisse and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association provided financing. www.fogodechao.com\n\n• Behrman Capital has acquired Corfin Industries, a Salem, N.H.-based provider of microelectronic component preparation services. www.corfin.com\n\nWater Street Healthcare Partners and JLL Partners have agreed to acquire Dohmen Life Science Services, a Milwaukee-based provider of operations services to biopharma and medical device companies, from The Dohmen Company. www.dlss.com\n\n• PWP Growth Equity and RedHawk Investment have invested an undisclosed amount into 360Training, an Austin, Texas-based provider of online training courses for regulated industries. www.36otraining.com\n\n• Orient Hontai Capital, a Chinese private equity firm, has agreed to buy a 53.5% stake in Imagina Media Audiovisual, a Spanish media company, valuing the target company at an enterprise value of €1.9 billion (US$2.34 billion). http://axioslink/CN5I\n\n• Leeds Equity Partners is investing in Endeavor Schools, a Miami-based owner and operator of 37 private K-12 schools in the U.S. www.endeavorschools.com\n\n• Cathay Capital MidCap Fund is buying a majority of stake in E. WINKEMANN, a German auto supplier. Financial terms weren't announced. Equistone Partners Europe will retain a stake along with company management. www.winkemann.de\n\nPublic Offerings\n• Deutsche Bank (NYSE: DB) plans to debut an IPO of its asset-management arm, DWS, for Monday next week, according to Reuters. It could list on the Frankfurt exchange as early as March 19. Deutsche Bank is planning to offer 25% of existing DWS shares for an expected 1.5 billion to €2 billion ($1.85 billion to $2.47 billion). http://axioslink/KNnd\n\n• Opes Acquisition, a Mexico-based blank check company formed by Axis Capital Management to acquire a Mexican business, has filed for an $100 million IPO. It will offer 10 million units at a price of $10. At that price, Opes Acquisition would command a market value of $129 million. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one warrant exercisable at $11.50. It plans to list on the Nasdaq under the symbol OPESU, with EarlyBirdCapital is the sole bookrunner on the deal. www.axiscapital.com.mx/eng\n\n• Tiberius Acquisition, a Metairie, La.-based blank check company formed to acquire a middle-market insurance business, filed for a $150 million IPO. It will offer 15 million units at a price of $10. At that price, Tiberius Acquisition would command a market value of $188 million. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase one share of common stock. It plans to list on the Nasdaq under the symbol TIBRU, with Cantor Fitzgerald and Dowling & Partners are the joint bookrunners on the deal.\n\nLiquidity Events\n• Xerox Corp shareholders Carl Icahn and Darwin Deason said Tuesday that the company should sell itself to one of its rivals or a private equity firm, opposing a potential deal with Fujifilm, according to Reuters. http://axioslink/jtPN\n\nMore M&A\n• S&P Global (NYSE: SPGI), a provider or markets data and analytics, has agreed to set to acquire Panjiva, a New York-based provider of supply chain data. www.panjiva.com\n\n• The Adecco Group, a Swiss human resources services firm, has acquired Vettery, a New York-based recruiting startup, for just over $100 million, according to TechCrunch. http://axioslink/hBcz\n\n• Oracle has acquired Zenedge, an Aventura, Fla.-based cybersecurity solutions provider. www.zenedge.com\n\n• Bosch has acquired Splitting Fares, a Detroit-based startup that provides ride-sharing platforms. www.splt.io\n\nFundraising\n• EQT is seeking 10.75 billion euros ($13.2 billion) for a new buyout fund, according to the Financial Times.\n\n• TechOperators Venture Capital, an Atlanta-based venture capital firm, has raised $40.2 million toward a $100 million third venture fund, according to an SEC filing. www.techoperators.com\n\nIt's Personnel\n• Amy Errett has joined True Ventures as a venture partner. Erret will remain CEO of Madison Reed, a San Francisco-based hair color company. http://axioslink/r9h8\n\n• Jeff Schumacher is stepping down as CEO of BCG Digital Ventures and will become non-executive chairman of the firm. www.bcgdv.com\n\n• Nicholas Leiby has joined Weinberg Capital Group as director. He was previously vice president at Resilience Capital Partners. www.weinbergcap.com\n\nFinal Numbers\nReproduced from BP Energy Outlook 2018; Chart: Axios Visuals"}, {"sender": "Steven Sinofsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21", "body": "Excerpt from below..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steven Sinofsky"], "timestamp": "2/21/2018 5:55:09 PM", "subject": "Re: Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21", "body": "Thx for taking the time"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025913.txt_2839
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025913.txt
subject: FW: Gingrich view of Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Brad Bowen [mail@impactoutdoor.com]", "recipients": ["Kevin McIntosh", "Ryan McIntosh <ryan@domain.com>", "A. Eckert", "Henry", "Terry Katka (cc)", "Coy E. Garrett (cc)", "Blake (cc)"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 2:16 PM", "subject": "FW: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Sis\npie"}, {"sender": "Kenny Shirley", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 12:11 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Realblondes", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "March 9, 2016 at 9:26:23 AM CST", "subject": "Fwd: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033584.txt_2848
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033584.txt
subject: humor and trump and evolutionary logic
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["REE jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "9/26/2016 8:59:46 PM", "subject": "humor and trump and evolutionary logic", "body": "was pleased that Robert Lynch's work and my own were cited in a Nation\narticle on the lack of humor of our Republican standard bearer\n\nhttps://www.thenation.com/article/have-you-ever-seen-donald-trump-laugh/\ncongratulations Robert\n\nJohn and Jeffrey, i will write you shortly"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031983.txt_2849
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031983.txt
subject: Re: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz [mailto:__", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: ", "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe, \n\nI understand you have some questions about my client,\nJeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage \nsurrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some \ninstances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you \nsend me any facutal questions so that I can provide you \nwith accurate responses. \n\nI am also available to speak with you. My number is \n\nThank you, \n\nJay"}, {"sender": "Wolfe, Alexandra", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/07/2011 02:04 PM EST", "subject": "RE: ", "body": "Dear Mr. Lefkowitz, \n\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein. Would he be available to answer any of these on the \nphone or by email? People have told me some of his thoughts on background but I wanted to see if he could \ntell me or email me anything directly I could use on the record. Also I'd like to run the information I already \nhave by you or him. \n\nThank you, \n\nAlexandra \n\n-What is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation? \nCould he talk about his interest in science and the 2011 grants/conference? \n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the same \nclients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion? \n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? With whom was he working/advising? \n-Where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago? \n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell? \n-What were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction? \n-What does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why? \n-What is his side of the story and have people been supportive? \n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "3/7/2011 7:12:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: ", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032422.txt_2852
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032422.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 2:02:04 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Not to disturb you, but I am struck by the similar mannerisms between Trump and McGyver"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032252.txt_2854
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032252.txt
subject: Re: bad
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 30, 2016, at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re: bad", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/31/us/politics/donald-trump-abortion.html?ribbon-ad-idx=3&rref=homepage&module=Ribbon&version=origin&region=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Home%20Page&pgtype=article"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/31/2016 8:27:13 AM", "subject": "Re: bad", "body": "Agreed. Trump appears to be losing momentum in polls even before that crazy comment. Think it may be beginning of the end of him... http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026100.txt_2859
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026100.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow I wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Call me now if u can"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/28/2017 12:14:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030762.txt_2864
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030762.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff <11.0111>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thought you might be interested in this--it's suddenly made me the only liberal-media guy with access to Trump circle. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-strategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747  \nAnd.. .1 have a bit of an idea for you re media and Saudi friends."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in palm beach is roger here?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think so."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 5:16:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im here today flying to nw york tomow. if he is up to it ild love to sit with him , house or on plane if we wants a ride"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023260.txt_2865
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023260.txt
subject: agenda
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella as Cs"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:21 AM", "subject": "agenda", "body": "1 fees, amount and to what entities when and responsiblitis. 2. gagosian idea to save a minimum of 10 mill and maybe more. 3. i can walk you through carlyns screw up, 50 % would have made little difference and maybe made it worse . 4. we should have an all hands meeting with your family to talk about art distribution on death. . 5. phaidon, decantings ( already firmly in progress ) loans. (alan ) pent. ( with follow up ) all part of same elegant transaction, 6 asymetric risk worth at least 50- 60 no matter how you calculate. I can explain. 7 lets get the money issue out of the way once and for all. I have my team set to start."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella iii"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 5:52 AM", "subject": "agenda", "body": "1) pg 1 A\" unequal shares\". pg 23 \"removal of trustees \" absolute. dont be confused with abiltiy to set"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021758.txt_2870
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021758.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Sica! EE"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 19 2009 11:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida money manager who once roamed in the same social circle as Bill Clinton, Prince\nAndrew and other high profile figures, is going to be released from prison early, a source tells\nRadarOnline.com.\n\nEpstein pleaded guilty last year to procuring teen girls for prostitution, ending his lifestyle with the rich and\nfamous in a Palm Beach, Florida scandal that reverberated through high-profile society. He received an 18-\nmonth sentence and was slated to be incarcerated until the end of this year.\n\nBut now, says the source, the jail door is about to swing open because Epstein has been secretly helping the feds\nunravel a suspected Ponzi scheme. He had inside knowledge of the scheme because he was one of its victims,\n\nlosing $67 million.\n\nThe source says it’s all tied to the indictment of former managers of Bear Stearns Mortgage Investment Fund, and\nin that case Epstein is the person who is identified only as Victim # 1.\n\nMeanwhile, Epstein’s life behind bars hasn’t been too rough — in fact he’s allowed to spend most days at his\nattorney’s office. He was supposedly working on a charity venture but the source says he was actually busy\nhelping the feds with the Ponzi scheme. One source says that he’s been guarded by men in suits with\nearphones.\n\nWell if those suits are going to follow him when he’s freed they better pack bathing suits. Epstein owns Little St.\nJames Island in the Virgin Islands."}, {"sender": "Peggy Sicgal li", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you cut and paste and email to my blackberry...I can't open this up. Peg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Fri Jun 19 16:17:18 2009", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.radaronline.com/category/tags/jeffrey- epstein <http://www.radaronline.com/category/tags/jeffrey- epstein>\n\nHELP ; areporter for the ny times wants to write the following ; Epsteins lawyers were contacted and they said they had no comment.. We\nhave checked with some of the worlds financial experts ,both in and out of gov't , the consensus is that if Epstein is cooperating with the\nfeds the average intelligence of the u.s. government , just went up dramatically."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022245.txt_2886
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022245.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun Sep 27 19:35:33 2009", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when does have to get back? [went to new york"}, {"sender": "Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No later than Wednesday probably.."}, {"sender": "J J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "On 9/28/09 6:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thanks,, where are you.. i loved your bono mick story,,"}, {"sender": "gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am in CA — that friend of yours whom I think lives in Paris was at the conference..she spoke to you last week..claims to be in charge of a hedge fund or something"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon Sep 28 19:16:28 2009", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do yu mean nicole junkerman"}, {"sender": "Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "That's her..I couldn't remember her name"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "9/28/2009 11:34:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "we just rea;lzied that the picture , in my kitchen is me clinton and ted. how funny"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026672.txt_2891
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026672.txt
subject: Did you see that Trump retweeted my story?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/17/2017 4:29:23 PM", "subject": "Did you see that Trump retweeted my story?", "body": "I think my wife is going to change the lock on the door tonight. \nhttps://twitter.com/realDonaldTrumastatus/842739155230740481"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025898.txt_2893
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025898.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ehud Barak"], "timestamp": "Aug 8, 2015, at 22:05", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thought you might find amusing"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:57 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, August 9, 2015", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nI really find it amusing. I don't agree with everything he says. But it is fascinating. BB is making \"historic\nmistakes\"(as he likes to blame others) both vis-a-vis Obama as well as in regard to the American Jewry. And\ncauses a direct damage to IL.\n\nNoam is so sharp and focused. Really impressive.\n\nI did not fully understand how the fallacy he sees in the attitude to the Ants example is related to Big Data\nillusions. An area (deep learning) I spent some time recently trying to better penetrate.\n\nBtw, the series of cubic differences should look 7,19,37,61 (not 21).\n\nWe greatly enjoyed staying in 62nd.\n\nWe plan to be back in the last week of Aug. for several weeks (having some speeches to make)\n\nwill you still be in NM?\n\nIf positive we might come over for few days.\n\nPl let us know.\n\nBest\n\nFrom Nili as well.\n\nRegards\n\nEB"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ehud Barak"], "timestamp": "Aug 10, 2015, at 03:25", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Correct on cube . Do you know what date yet in August ?"}, {"sender": "Ehud Bark", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "8/10/2015 5:09:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nAs of now we plan to be in NY around August 25. We plan to work on my biography with the editor. Probably\nstarting Sept 1st. But it's all flexible till Sept 11 and on, when I have my speeches and other events.\n\nBest\n\nEB"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033369.txt_2895
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033369.txt
subject: Trump financial disclosure
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/13/2019 2:49:13 PM", "subject": "Trump financial disclosure", "body": "Catching up on some reading and finally read trumps 100 pages of nonsense. Some interesting findings:\n1) foundation is inactive\n\n2) ironic that starett city largest federal subsidized housing project which trump had 4 percent interest was\nfinally sold while he is president.\n\nhttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bizjournals.com/newyork/news/2018/05/09/starrett-city-sells-giving-\n\ntrump-a-profit.amp.html\n\n3) other than doral and post office hotel no substantial income from any of his enties that he showed..\n4) 30 pages of stock purchases and sales all 5-15k.\n\n5) cash in his name 25mm or less\n\n6) still has money in revocable trust from his father at jpm 1-5mm\n\n7) claims to have as much as 125mm in trump revocable trust at cap one, professional bank, signature bank and\nbank United but can be as little as 40mm it mins were real numbers.\n\nDidn’t he once say he say he had billions of liquidity..\n\n8) valued planes from 56 to over 86mm. Down from 300mm on earlier disclosures..\n\n9) Bank used for last mortgage on ocean drive purchase is a coral gables bank that is opening in boca as well.\n\nhttps://www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/05/16/read-president-donald-trumps-financial-disclosure-report.html\n\nhttps://myprobank.com/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023274.txt_2900
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023274.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:10 PM", "subject": null, "body": "emblematic of my frustration and ,in the end what I believe is a waste of our time energy money and resources. is the very simple question of bidco bank accounts. 4 months ago I asked the question , does it have a bank account and if so , who has authority, where is it located and what transacations ran through it. it is only one question out of hundreds that need to be answered. hundreds. . you asked that i not behave like Zeus and try to explain why I want need certain things. since i said to placate Brad's inquisitive ness and his desire to learn I said a filing might be required. instead of merely getting me the answer. he has talked to joslin paul weiss , you , you wanted to ask brad karp. ( maybe a filing that reopened things, )\n\nnone of this as a practical matter has any influence upon the ultimate action taken . I merely needed to know a simple answer. and today after asking at least every week since then do not have an answer. I have been trying not to add stress to your day. 1 try to explain things and take the time to do so gently, ( not my forte . this is one question out of hundreds. the fact that a 21 year old was in the office only xeroxing for a month, was obvious to everyone in the office. having a 26 year old xeroxing instead doesnt move us forward, answers first. copying old files. can wait."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:56 PM", "subject": "another flowery email.", "body": "I am sorry. I realize you are under tremendous stress, In Bedford you asked me for my help I could not have been more clear that thought it very unwise as in my words I did not want any financial arrangment between us, it risked conflict and tension what neither of us needed more of. and did not want to risk torturing our friendship into the likes of the kind you have with Mark nor Josh, : now,- I dont have anyone but you yelling at me , in my own house. no one. it is highly unpleasant but I am trying my best to be understanding . sorry. From the outset and as you told me you recall. 1 tsuggested that three years should be the period of engagment. as planning is not a one year excericse . you declined to commit to a number of alternatives presented to you for payment of the third year. I told you in nov that you should decide whether to now sign on for that very third year as the vast majority of my work ended on oct 15. you recently told me you thought i was kidding. -you hired brad patting him on the back that after months of inquiry he can now, finallly tell you which llc owns the cars??\n\nonce he has all the facts what next ??._ whether or not you refer to a portion of the third year as after care, or whatever term besides 'scoundrel you choose to use, I m not sure why you assume now it should be free.( 1 HATE THIS CONVERSATION < HATE , ) andi heard you when you said you told me what was | work still to be done you thought valuable enough to pay for. please tell me . and then we can decide the next steps ,,, if any. I consider my work rarefied art. I guess the value is in the eye of the beholder . IT reminds me of those people looking at a modern art piece and saying \" my child could do that\". hope you are feeling better."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:50 AM", "subject": null, "body": "ada and brad are respondbile for the loan ,. docs, at a minimum, leon he hasn't read the financial statements SINCE DEC. !!. impossible ,had he done so the silly numbers jump off the page . ( sent in another email ). it is a financial office., 190 million sitting unused in CASH , budget and planning person"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032711.txt_2906
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032711.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I didn’t offer him a time yet . As I need my marching orders;)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just his plan. Trump is going to go down--why doesn't use this opportunity to strike out on his own? Also,\ngently imply I have tapes. I wonder, btw, if he isn't interested in talking to you about in fact bringing down\n\nTrump. Can't wait to hear?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "212 772 9416"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 10:57:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Up?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026114.txt_2907
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026114.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Wow I wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Call me now if u can"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 29, 2017 8:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You can come earlier if you like?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Mon, May 29, 2017 at 8:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 7:20 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "can you call my cell"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "At wake now. Is AM ok - what is #"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Nick, Donald has recently said that I betrayed him 15 years ago , he said there was a lawsuit that he asked me to get involved and help and I refused. Do you have any insight ??"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/3/2017 12:19:29 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Or u can call me now"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023044.txt_2914
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023044.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "2/1/2019 10:18:49 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "have fun"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 5:18 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "prostittion is a state crime, never before a man in his own house charged with soliciting. ! in Florida first offenders are required to take a sex ed class and get pre trial diversion, no criminal record. . . there is a felony solication for the THIRD offense. . A grand jury was held and they found me guilty of one count of felony solitciation. because there were many girls. . mandatory diversion. sentence. !!!! a grand jury . ususally only for capital murder cases. . Recarey and Reiter ( police chief). pulled my garbage for months, and surveilled the house . letting all the gilrs come and go ? ! called in the FBI. they did not like the grand jury result. and released to the press, the raw sewage of police interviews , ie, no girl was cross examined EVER. . Unheard of . - the girls retunred the house multiplie times. for 200 dollars for a rub and tug. . no sex. . some worked in the locak massage parlors, most in thier mid twenties.. There is only press stories told my strippers of me buying my girlfiedn from slovakia from her parents . girls under 15. . all made up to get press. . FBI / puts a task force together title\" operation leap year\" to investigate my personal massage activity ?! nuts. interviews my chiropractor ? medical info. . etc. worked at Mara Lago. Trump knew of it. and came to my house many times during that period. The testimony of the houseman John allessi confiremed it. He never got a massage. abe gosman a friend of mine. ran into financial difficulty with assited living homes. . His home was listed at 45 million dollars. with no takers for months on end . He and I agreed a price of 30m. ( His wife . ends up going to jail for lying to the bankrupty trustee about her jewelry. ) this is in the summer of 04. . I became the stalking horse bidder at 36 m. ie if someone bid higher I would receive a fee. trump buys the house at the telephone auction. only me trump andd his friend pulty the developer. He quickly puts it on the market for 125 million, serves the purpose of a justification for a high sale later . . and no one will touch it. it is is bough in the name of trump properties 11c.. no idea who owns it. or what else it\" owns \". Three years later 08 he sells it to Ryboloolev for approx 100 million. He should have had a 50 million plus capital gain. he tells people and press he spent 20-30 m to fix up. that would justifiy a reduction in captial gains, key question how did he report the sale , if he did at all on his 08 tax return. He has no money. when he buys the house. His biz model is putting his name on a real estate development and gets a fee for using his name. The hotel biz is just that. someone else buys the hotel. hoping to make a profit from its operation and eventual sale. Trump put his name on it, and get a 2 % fee and maybe a piece of the profit if any on sale. He touts the project as \" his \" . just as in his current financial statements on file as president he lists his \" income \" as the GROSS receipts of the clubs, with no expenses deducted. not his personal revenue. ie the doral golf club loses money every year. it pays out more than it takes in , but he lists the revenue as his income. AMAZING."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032739.txt_2918
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032739.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am I seeing you tomorrow morning?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes 730?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Later possible? Need my beauty sleep"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tonight or tomorrow"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [reid.weingarten@wilmerhale.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 3:19:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Flying in from vancouver now...about to board...what works best for you tomorrow?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031088.txt_2919
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031088.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "Friday, December 17, 2010 7:32 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "woody asked summer , so what do you do? 30 minutes later , she had not taken a breath. . either medicated, or\nmanic..,\n\nDe ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee a"}, {"sender": "Faith Kate Sis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/17/2010 1:13:39 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Neither very funny...always ask for the 3 minute version but most of the girls you Know haven't spoken for a total of 30\nminutes in all the time you knew them....she is a GREAT girl who is refreshing in this business totally focused and smart.\nJeffrey | brought her to a meeting with scientists a few months back she knew more than they did and totally embarrassed\nnot only the scientists but the client was totally unprepared for what she knew, she actually was able to tell them things\nthey were and weren't doing that they had no clue of and they changed there practices at p&g!!!! this is the kind of girl to\nmold she is the leader in her field of sustainability ny times wrote an article if you cant afford al gore hire summer rayne\nsays something.\n\nXOXO"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030986.txt_2923
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030986.txt
subject: Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "https://thehill.com/policy/finance/422577-trump-considering-firing-federal-reserve-chief-after-latest-interest-rate-hike"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2018, at 9:22 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "In 1993, Powell began working as a managing director for Bankers Trust, but he quit in 1995 after the bank got into trouble when several customers suffered large losses due to derivatives. He then went back to work for Dillon, Read & Co.\nhe didnt understand the markets 25 years ago. obama appointed him to the board, what else do you guys need to know"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 3:31:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "LMAO\nPerfect mnuchin hit"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029569.txt_2931
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029569.txt
subject: Re: invitation
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed. \nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to \nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next \ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar \nthemes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a \nyoung girl. \nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \n\"bootleg\" episode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with \nme and you were so kind to make it happen. \nLisa"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey, \nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "serena , bill clinon shaque and,,,,, have all on pbs. ? read poetry for children. I would love to have you \ndo the same........blah blah blah do not say come on my show."}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:39 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "this poem about childbirth and is not for children. \nIt's for adults and it raises awareness on the issues of discrimination against women athletes in sports \n,and, against women of color in childbirth. These are Serena's big issues now. \nLisa"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:41 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "sorry , that was meant as a filler what is important is that she is joining the others priority . and not \nappearing on your show. ! :) i invite you to appear is DOA"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:45 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "can you give me a little bit of phrasing you think is optimal? I'm not sure I know how to ask her to join this \ncompany without asking her to be \npart of poetry in america. It does also seem to me perhaps relevant that Serena thinks of herself as a poetry \nperson. \nFor people who think that way, maybe not nothing (hasn't been nothing to others) that a Harvard poetry \nprofessor seeks her wisdom on the art form? \nWould really appreciate your edit. \nLisa"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Elisa New"], "timestamp": "11/25/2018 11:55:13 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031326.txt_2932
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031326.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "gmax1@ellmax.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/2/2011 7:09:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I have been thinking about that..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Gmax"], "timestamp": "Sat Apr 02 14:25:45 2011", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i want you to realize that that dog that hasn't barked is trump.. virignia  spent hours at my house with him ,, he has never once been mentioned.   police chief. etc.   im 75 % there"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022624.txt_2935
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022624.txt
subject: Re: Filing in Epstein case
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "March 27, 2014", "subject": "Re: Filing in Epstein case", "body": "Disgusting: Clinton Snared In Pedophile Ring\n\nWill having friends in high places exempt him from the rule of law?\n\nSr\n\nis Zane — March 27, 2014\n\nAccording to former child sex slave Virginia Roberts and a class action lawsuit against convicted billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, former President Bill Clinton was present during sex parties involving up to twenty underage girls at Epstein’s secluded island in the Caribbean. That flight records show Clinton was flown on numerous occasions to the island on Epstein’s private jet. Clinton had a close relationship with an employee of Epstein’s who compiled thousands of photos of nude young girls posed in lewd positions. And these photos were used as a catalog for Epstein to loan out his girls to powerful politicians and British royalty, including Bill Clinton.\n\nAccording to the lawsuit:\n\n..-Clinton was friends with an unnamed woman who “kept images of naked underage children on her computer, helped to recruit underage children for Epstein... and photographed underage females in sexually explicit poses.”\n\nWhile Epstein was indicted and jailed for his pedophilia, Bill Clinton oddly has remained unscathed, more than likely by having friends in high places.\n\nIf Bill Clinton is in fact a pedophile, will the American people demand that he be put away for a very long time so that he can’t hurt any more children? Or will having friends in high places exempt him from the rule of law?\n\nTime will tell."}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Martin G Weinberg"], "timestamp": "12/31/2014 11:43:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Filing in Epstein case", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021764.txt_2937
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021764.txt
subject: Fwd: Fw: Epstein News Articles
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Reiter/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Joyce"], "timestamp": "08/12/2008 09:33PM", "subject": "Epstein News Articles", "body": "I am looking forward to meeting with you on Wednesday. Please find below (and attached as a PDF file),\nsome background information for your reference. Thanks for agreeing to have this discussion.\n\nRegards,\n\nMike"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:53 AM", "subject": "Fw: Epstein News Articles", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz fim Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "2/26/2010 3:01:31 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein News Articles", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033341.txt_2942
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033341.txt
subject: POTUS
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/1/2019 8:12:28 PM", "subject": "POTUS", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nJust heads up\nPresident Trump arrives PBI today and is scheduled to depart 9pm on Sunday,\nShould not effect our arrival at 11:30pm Sunday evening\n\nThx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025347.txt_2947
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025347.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 15, 2012 5:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "do i assume that you have no more option questions?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 15, 2012 11:47 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Dealing with the Jackson shitshow right now...options problems are a pimple in an elephant's ass in the case...when are you next in nyc"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 15, 2012 5:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "not sure, when is your opening? i am not referrring to either sheryl or c"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 15, 2012 11:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "What a funny dude you are two weeks from tomorrow...having dinner tonite with your buddy wild bill c...should I bring you up?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 15, 2012 04:01 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "richardson ?? of course or gates?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/16/2012 1:00:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Clinton"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033355.txt_2951
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033355.txt
subject: The New York Times: Trump tax figures show over $1 billion in losses over 10 years
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/8/2019 12:36:13 AM", "subject": "The New York Times: Trump tax figures show over $1 billion in losses over 10 years", "body": "Trump tax figures show over $1 billion in losses over 10 years\nThe Times obtained details from a decade of the president’s tax returns, revealing $1.17 billion in business\nlosses. Here’s what else the numbers show.\n\nRead in The New York Times: https://apple.news/AnDrX8 VebSwagqxfHkuKK85g\n\nShared from Apple News"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031332.txt_2959
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031332.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "gmax1@ellmax.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/2/2011 2:20:56 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Dear President Obama:\nI am writing today with a somewhat unusual request.\n\nFirst and foremost, I am asking that you return America to its August 20th, 1959 borders so that Hawaii is no longer a state and you are no longer a citizen.\nSincerely,\nPrime Minister\nBenjamin Netanyahu"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031454.txt_2960
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031454.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump.\n\nBecause of this.\n\nThat story will never die."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 4:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "hawain tropic girl\nlauren petrella"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon <landon.thomas@nytimes.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am serious man -- for the good of the nation why not try to get some of this out there. I would not do it myself, but would pass on to a political reporter.\n\nhttp://www.buzzfeed.com/alexcampbell/court-papers-trump-ate-at-jeffrey-epsteins-house#.1toekLMRz6\n\nPlus: look at these lies!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "http://en.actu-cci.com/features/200-women-managers/8910-celina-midelfart-the-queen-of-glamour my 20 year old girlfriend in 93„ that after two years i gave to donald"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 10:18:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Amazing! When is last time you talked to him?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026128.txt_2961
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026128.txt
subject: Re: some questions...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/8/2017 8:52:26 PM", "subject": "Re: some questions...", "body": "A bit tone deaf, but a reasonable basis for creating a brief. If there's any issues you'd like me to clarify with him or explore, lemme know. It's just a friendly lunch, with the prospect of some Trump info."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:48 PM", "subject": "Re: some questions...", "body": "Thoughts"}, {"sender": "Matthew Hiltzik", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 2:37 PM", "subject": "some questions...", "body": "Attached and below please find some initial questions for you... Looking forward to connecting over the next two days... 1. Please provide a brief overview of your professional background? 2. Who were your mentors? Do you keep in touch with any of them? 3. What are your 5 best professional achievements? 4. Who are some of your business partners? 5. Who are third-party validators who would speak on your behalf on the record? 6. Who are third-party validators who would speak on your behalf off the record? 7. What business projects are you currently working on? 8. What are your 5 best scientific achievements? 9. What are you currently working on in the science field? 10. What research institutions are you collaborating with? 11. What past philanthropic causes are you most proud of? 12. What philanthropic causes are you currently working on? 13. What organizations are you collaborating with philanthropically? 14. What upcoming events are you putting together or participating in? 15. What specific impacts have the accusations had on your career? 16. What specific impacts have the accusations had on your personal life? 17. What are the top 10-15 misrepresentations of what actually happened? 18. How are you specifically treated differently at home and abroad? 19. Are there any outstanding legal challenges that you are facing? 20. What are the other outstanding lawsuits that may draw publicity to your case? 21. Is there anything else upcoming that may draw interest to your case? 22. Have you agreed to any non-disclosures? Are there things you can't say about your case? 23. Did you ever write an op-ed? Would you ever write an op-ed?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030992.txt_2964
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030992.txt
subject: Fwd: FW: As Obama says "We've got problems"
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/14/2009 7:02:11 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: As Obama says \"We've got problems\"", "body": ""}, {"sender": "gmax <gmax@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 6:15 PM", "subject": "FW: As Obama says \"We've got problems\"", "body": "We are in trouble.... \nThe population of this America is 300 \nmillion. \n160 million are retired. \nThat leaves 140 million to do the work. \nThere are 85 million in school. \nWhich leaves 55 million to do the work. \nOf this there are 35 million employed by \nthe federal government. \nLeaving 20 million to do the work. \n2.8 million are in the armed forces \npreoccupied with killing Osama \nBin-Laden. \nWhich leaves 17.2 million to do the work. \nTake from that total the 15..8 million \npeople who work for state and city \nGovernments. And that leaves 1.4 million \nto do the work. \nAt any given time there are 188,000 people \nin hospitals. \nLeaving 1,212,000 to do the work. \nNow, there are 1,211,998 people in prisons. \nThat leaves just two people to do the work. \nYou and me. \nAnd there you are, \nSitting on your chair, \nAt your computer, reading jokes. \nNice. Real nice."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026413.txt_2965
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026413.txt
subject: Re: Mechanisms for learning
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joscha Bach"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Cells seem to be mostly indistinguishable (except for XX), I thought?\nSize is different on average, but males with small brains are still male.\n\ngender differenece. unlikely motivational. every cell is different. size is didfferent. .\n\nthe more radical idea is that brains are the nucleus of the human\" cell: the body the membrane, . the\norganizm the colletcions and interactions of brains. wisdom of crowds . mirroring. etc. . money\nused as signals. as is spoken language.. what does social behavior mean , it is the cooridination of indiv\nbrains. =\n\nI think that mathematics based thinking does not allow for censorship. money people concepts if they\nare all math , then political correctness and their structures are only subsets of a larger group of\nthoughts. its not emotinal for me.\n\nmost people have censorship built in at a deep level, social reasoning gets to different results than equivalent\nabstract reasoning"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 6:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Variation of all traits is higher for males, so there are more high IQ men (wider bell-curve). Given average\nbrain size difference, the small difference in average IQ is surprising, I think"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joscha Bach"], "timestamp": "Jul 24, 2016 00:20", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "the average is the only thing that matters"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 1:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Average humans are probably not fully able to learn how to program etc. Fraction of people that reshape the\nworld are at the right end of the Bell curves, so difference in variation means fewer women. We tend to be\nmore interested in the outliers. Have people explicitly evolved to be not to be too smart on average, or is\ngeneral intelligence so hard to get from human brains?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joscha Bach"], "timestamp": "7/24/2016 5:44:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "average humans is the wrong term. it is humans that are distributed think ant colony.( workers soldiers etc\n) not average ant. no such thing. in isolation"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029271.txt_2981
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029271.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wott [ia"], "timestamp": "5/25/2016 11:09:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "do you want to be provacative .? trump shuttle. hawaiin tropic contests.. mortgage on mara\nlago. ? revenue of golf courses as income.??! , total debt of all cos .? people dont want to conribute money\nas he said he is worth over 10b , why should they? , calif already coming up short. . fatther bought chips in\nthe casino to stave off bankruptcy, chips because it was better than a first lien. under the gambling\nrules. matt his bag man? his loan from his brother in law ( JUdges husband) how much did his father\nleave. his brother robert etc.\n\notherwise you can just throw easys"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I'm interviewing him this afternoon. Anything you think I should ask?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032218.txt_2985
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032218.txt
subject: Tim Zagat
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jefffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/25/2018 8:15:47 PM", "subject": "Tim Zagat", "body": "Tim Zagat would like to take you to dinner some time soon! he says he is always in NY from Sunday night to WEd...and of course you are always invited to go see him in the country for dinner Thurs-Sunday...he says\n\nhe was in Paris for the past 2 weeks and had amazing dinners..He also wants to tell you about he dream he had about Trump!\n\nTim's office\nTim's Home:\n\nTim's cell:"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028850.txt_2986
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028850.txt
subject: Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/27/2014 6:57:02 PM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "Calling you from a 310 #... \nPlease use my alternative address, \nto avoid email auto responder"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 27, 2014, at 04:41", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "if you havetime"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 6:54 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "President Obama's response to the Ukraine crisis, while derided by critics as slow and weak, has \nreinvigorated a 15-year global hunt for the Russian leader's hidden wealth. \nhttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/27/world/sanctions-revive-search-for-secret-putin-\nfortune.html?smid=nytnow-share&smprod=nytnow"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022817.txt_2998
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022817.txt
subject: Fwd: Viceland
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "8/13/2018 7:30:44 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Viceland", "body": "Fyi\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Matt Williams", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "August 13, 2018 at 3:15:32 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": "Thank you Marty,\n\nThe questions we wanted to reach out to Mr Epstein for comment are listed below. Feel free to contact me on\na -: reviewing. Kind regards - Matt\n\nA former employee has told us that Donald Trump attended Mr Epstein's Palm Beach estate on at least two occasions. Does Mr\nEpstein recall hosting Donald Trump at that residence?\n\nOn one such occasion, it has been suggested to us that Mr Epstein and Donald Trump watched “young girls try on bikinis” while making\ncomments on the their bodies.” Does Mr Epstein have any comment?\n\nHow does Mr Epstein respond to claims that women - some under the legal age of sexual consent - were used as “sex slaves” at his\nproperties?\n\nA former employee of Mr Epstein has alleged to us that Mr Epstein sexually assaulted her on\nnumerous occasions. Does Mr Epstein have a comment?\n\nDid or does Mr Epstein have cameras inside rooms at his Palm Beach residence?\n\nDid Mr Epstein remove those cameras before police raided the property as part of the investigation into alleged crimes? Did Mr Epstein\never hand over any recordings from any cameras at his properties to the authorities as part of his non-prosecution agreement?\n\nDoes Mr Epstein have in his possession any video recordings of Donald Trump taken from inside his Palm Beach estate or any other\nresidence?\n\nDid Mr Epstein hold sex parties at his residences involving girls under the age of sexual consent? Was Donald Trump ever present at\nany of these parties?\n\nHas Mr Epstein upheld the conditions of his sentencing and registered as a sex offender in all jurisdictions in which he is due to do so?\n\nDoes Mr Epstein have any comment regarding allegations made by a woman named in the media as Virginia Giuffre/Roberts relating to\nher being sexually abused by Mr Epstein or used as a \"sex slave\"?\n\nENDS"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["Matt Williams"], "timestamp": "13 August 2018 at 14:52", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": "If you still want, send the questions. | would talk with you off the record after reviewing them (reserving the right at my\noption to make an on the record statement), hope that works for you. Marty"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031705.txt_3003
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031705.txt
subject: Fwd: Why not in Vegas?
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/2/2012 5:57:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Why not in Vegas?", "body": "I'll make this quick. I have one question and one observation about Mitt Romney’s visit to Israel. The question\nis this: Since the whole trip was not about learning anything but about how to satisfy the political whims of the\nright-wing, super pro-Bibi Netanyahu, American Jewish casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, why didn’t they just\ndo the whole thing in Las Vegas? I mean, it was all about money anyway — how much Romney would abase\nhimself by saying whatever the Israeli right wanted to hear and how big a jackpot of donations Adelson would\nshower on the Romney campaign in return. Really, Vegas would have been so much more appropriate than\nJerusalem. They could have constructed a plastic Wailing Wall and saved so much on gas."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029503.txt_3006
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029503.txt
subject: A hilarious attempt by TE-A-ME to "Purify" Trump | A TE-A-ME Intervention - YouTube
messages:
  [{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/17/2016 7:26:43 PM", "subject": "A hilarious attempt by TE-A-ME to \"Purify\" Trump | A TE-A-ME Intervention - YouTube", "body": "The Indians are getting involved https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=share&v=hY y7qy2AQeo"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029582.txt_3007
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029582.txt
subject:
  Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070

messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/12/2018 6:28:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "sexy"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "How are you sneaky?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "Yup"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "Woow0"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033004.txt_3009
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033004.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "5/30/2017 7:53:55 PM", "subject": null, "body": "how did today go . . https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/29/close-friend-trump-thomas-barrack-alleged-tax-evasion-italy-sardinia?CMP=share btn fb"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024930.txt_3020
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024930.txt
subject: Fwd: Fw: shikh mohammed first media e session
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:06:58 -0400", "subject": "shikh mohammed first media e session", "body": "UAE Prime Minister \nFirst Media e-Session with the Prime Minister \nDear Friends in the Media: \nI write this in the spirit of good will to thank all of you for your interest in communicating with me through the \nofficial Prime Minister's Web site. \n\nThis is the second time that I have responded to your questions online; the first time was eight years ago, when \nInternet communications were still in the nascent stage -- although, I must say, Dubai and the United Arab \nEmirates had already made noteworthy progress in this field. During that initial online interview, my objective \nwas to stimulate the interest of the Emirati community in the Internet when the use of the online \ncommunications was relatively limited. \n\nToday the usage of the Internet across the UAE has come to be taken for granted; in fact, the Web has been \nadopted so extensively in both the public and private sectors that e-communications are the norm rather than the \nexception. We see that a large segment of our society, especially young people, believe that the Internet is the \nmost important source of information, education and entertainment. \n\nThe UAE continues to lead the Arab world in adoption of information and communication technology \naccording to the annual global infor mation technology report released before yesterday. \n\nLittle wonder, then, that I get inundated with questions from citizens and media alike. That's why I have chosen \nto meet with you via my Web site. I think hosting this encounter online will allow all of you to ask as many \nquestions as you wish. In the last few days alone, I have received hundreds of questions from several local and \nregional newspapers. Naturally, there was some overlapping of questions since they came from so many \ndifferent sources. Hence, I have tried to consolidate my answers in such a manner that I do not come across as \nrepetitious. \n\nThis \"interview,\" of course, relates to questions from the media, whose work I consider especially significant in \ntelling the story of how Dubai and the UAE are coping successfully with the global financial crisis, and how our \ndevelopment plans are being advanced with the resilience and determination that has always characterized \nEmirati society. \n\nI have also received many questions from everyday Emiratis, and these will be answered in a subsequent \ncommunication. \n\nIn the meantime, I hope my responses will generate positive discussion about the issues and values that Dubai \nand the UAE care about — the strengthening of a society that's anchored in unique Emirati traditions, and the \ncontinued building of a global city to which all are welcome, a city that is well integrated in the fast changing \nglobal commons that we all must share. Dubai is not only a catalyst of change; it is an exemplar of change. And \nI am proud of that, just as I am proud of the economic and social contributions that Emiratis and their well-\nwishers have made over these years to furthering the Dubai Vision."}, {"sender": "Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem", "recipients": ["Jeffery vacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 3:03 PM", "subject": "Fw: shikh mohammed first media e session", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, April 18 2009 07:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: shikh mohammed first media e session", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025873.txt_3029
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025873.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Sterr i"], "timestamp": "4 Jan 2015, at 08:23", "subject": "Re:", "body": "pa people could showcase the lack of her credibility as in the story she details a dinner with clinton on my island down to where he was sitting howver it never ever happened CLINTON was never on the island the story , heli is all a total fiction. it could help shred her story."}, {"sender": "David Sterr i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2015 8:31:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Understood"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032224.txt_3030
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032224.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump is living proof of the adage that it is better to be lucky than smart."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015, at 10:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ill give you details when i see you, when are you in ny?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Going up to NY Friday morning. Think Iam going to drive. I will then stop to pee and get gas at a rest stop\non the New Jersey turnpike, will observe all of the people there who are at least 100 pounds overweight, will\nhave a mild panic attack as a result of the observation, and will then decide that I am not eating another bite of\nfood for the rest of my life out of fear that I will end up like one of these people."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015 at 10:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what time , I will come up"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/27/2015 2:38:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will leave @ 9, so will be in ny @ 1 pm."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032230.txt_3035
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032230.txt
subject: Fw: Meet?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg [martinweinberg@i...]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/21/2016 12:18:58 AM", "subject": "Fw: Meet?", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Mosk, Matthew", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016 6:08 PM", "subject": "Meet?", "body": "Mr. Weinberg —\n\nI am a reporter with the ABC News investigative unit. We are gathering background research on the major candidates for President.\n\nSeeing that both former President Clinton and Mr. Trump have been mentioned in connection to the Jeffrey Epstein case, I am interested in better understanding the case, it’s current status, and any information that could help explain Mr. Epstein’s dealings and interactions with both men.\n\nI would very much appreciate the chance to meet and discuss this subject in an off the record conversation at your earliest convenience.\n\nPlease let me know if that would be possible, and if so, when and where we could meet.\nMany thanks,\n\nMatthew"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028621.txt_3038
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028621.txt
subject: FW: Press Snapshot: Monday, August 26th, 2013
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic <n", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 26 2013 02:46 PM", "subject": "FW: Press Snapshot: Monday, August 26th, 2013", "body": "See good article re balmer below.\nStill awaiting for call reply"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032936.txt_3048
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032936.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["jean.huguen i: Lesley Gott"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 12:22:35 AM", "subject": null, "body": "can you delay your trip one week, . trump related issues occupying my time. say 13 14 instead"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030789.txt_3053
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030789.txt
subject: Re: A few thoughts
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "7/12/2018 10:36:12 AM", "subject": "Re: A few thoughts", "body": "yes, and hannity and he seemed jet lagged and sloppy . it had bit of air of desperation. ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 3:55 AM", "subject": "Re: A few thoughts", "body": "1) I saw SB in London yesterday and he seemed especially paranoid about any reporters seeing me with him. \nMy guess is that he is working hard on his relationship with Trump who he sees as newly ascendent and being \nseen with me might queer that. \n2) He went on Hannity last night and will be on Piers Morgan tomorrow and that seemed with an eye toward \nan audience of one. \n3) He was having a meeting yesterday with the French right wingers, including Le Pen's husband, about \nrefinancing the National Front Party because apparently a good part of their money comes from Russia. Two \nthoughts here, these guys seemed like idiots, pure Ruritania, and Bannon, surrounded by his own thuggish-\nlooking security people and whacky-bloggers advisors, thrives precisely because the world of populism is so \nunprofessional (if not farcical). \nmore later..."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031118.txt_3056
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031118.txt
subject: Fw: Oscar Diary
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/7/2013 2:03:11 PM", "subject": "Fw: Oscar Diary", "body": "I am struggling thru this. It is so late already. I am so stressed out. Will finishe is in a day or two.. I can not write about the Katzenberg party. Maybe can just mention is happened in my hotel But the reason to go was to support Katzenberg and network. More to come. Peg"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, March 07, 2013 08:51 AM", "subject": "Oscar Diary", "body": "It's Thursday morning on Wilshire Boulevard and the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences has just opened it's doors for ticket pick-up for the 85th Oscar telecast. \n\nForty voting members, the distinguished director Norman Jewison and I are on a long single file line that snakes thru the lobby patiently waiting to go upstairs to pick up our tickets. My seats were awarded via a lottery system. We clutch our photo I.D. \n\nSuddenly, a messenger slips in wearing a smart khaki windbreaker and cuts through the line. He announces to the uniformed guard in a stage whisper, \"Dreamworks\", and as if Steven Spielberg himself had just delivered the Gettysburg address, is ushered upstairs. \n\nThat is the final act of social justice of the \"Lincoln\" campaign. \n\nI am sleep deprived and jet lagged having just spent six hours on a flight sitting next Paula Wagner who is Tom Cruise's ex-agent turned Broadway producer for Jessica Chastain's \"The Heiress\". We discuss Jessica's not so great chances to beat Jennifer Lawrence for Best Actress. I mention Harvey Weinstein's concern about Emmanuel Riva's last minute surge. The French phenomena doesn't speak English, has never been to L.A. and it's like voting for a ghost, even on her 86th birthday. \n\nThis is the year I got phone calls in September from top studio executives announcing each are winning the Oscar. Their euphoric giddiness is due to the quality of the films resulting in the priciest oscar campaigns on record and astounding audience support at the theaters. \n\nSeven of the nine best picture nominees have taken in well over $100 million at the domestic box office to date, but it's the worldwide numbers in the millions that are staggering. \n\nTwentieth Century Fox's \"Life of Pi\" caused a tsunami at $595, Universal's \"Les Miserables\" scored $412, the Weinstein Cos.' \"Django Unchained\" whipped up $395, DreamWorks' \"Lincoln\" delivered at $254, Warner's \"Argo\" captured $219, Weinstein's \"Silver Lining Playbook\" danced to $187 and Sony's \"Zero Dark Thirty\" killed at $107 million. \n\nIn comparison, Sony Classics' \"Amour\" received $19 and Fox Searchlights' \"Beast of the Southern Wild\" worked up $19 million. \n\nHugh audiences having actually seen the films this year have an ear for the nuances of the Oscar race and everyone including Ben Affleck follow the bloggers religiously. \n\nSo by Thursday morning on line at the Academy the informed buzz was as follows: \"Argo\" takes best picture because is was most entertaining. The director snub to Ben Affleck was a Godsend as George Clooney's advice came from far away Berlin where he was in pre-production on \"The Monuments Men\". Warner's president Sue Kroll kept the campaign clean and calm on the home front. \n\n\"Lincoln's\" victory is Daniel Day Lewis from day one of shooting, no pun intended. The suggestion that Obama is our answer to Lincoln was interesting. Voters knew Obama secretly hosted three screenings in the White House, but they weren't invited. The Hollywood Foreign press were the biggest winners with Bill Clinton's surprise appearance on their broadcast. DreamWorks' ran an impeccable patriotic campaign that the media ate up. \n\nThe best director race had the most drama. Hollywood dreaded Spielberg loosing to Ang Lee. (Eventually everyone was thrilled Steven was anointed president of the Cannes Jury for 2013 the day after the awards show.) \n\nThe voters knew beloved Ang Lee's three year boat ride was the technical miracle. Fox's $595 million international box office blew in the win. \n\nHarvey Weinstein having three horses running is always the most talked about. His loquacious Quentin Tarentino was a lock for screenplay. Best supporting actor was a total toss up with a sentimental edge to Robert DeNiro. We even applauded Bob putting his handprints in cement in front of Grauman's Chinese Theater. \n\nThe conversations continued about how our government put the cabasch on \"Zero Dark Thirty\" with their arrogant denial of enhanced interrogation. Even MPAA President Chris Dodd could not help Mark Boal, Katherine Bigalow and Amy Pascal. \n\nAdditional chatter was the renewed last minute love for \"Les Miserables\". Clearly the most polarizing film in the race, this 27 year old theatrical musical seen by 60 million fans is now the talk of the Oscar weekend. \n\nHugh Jackman, Anne Hathaway, Russell Crowe, Amanda Segfried, Eddie Redmayne, Sasha Baron Cohen, Helena Bonham Carter and Samanthe Barks are making an historic one time live performance as part of Sunday's television broadcast. Producers Craig Zadan and Neil Meron's will attempt to razzel dazzel us with an homage to movie musicals for three plus hours at the Dolby theater. \n\nBarbra Streisand, Adele and Shirley Basse's appearances also create high anxiety and a blood bath for tickets...hence the hysteria created by DreamWorks' messenger cutting the line. \n\nAfter checking into the iconic Beverly Hills Hotel, my home away from home for 30 years of Oscar weekends and meticulously laying out all the ensembles sent from Valentino and Ralph Rucci, I hit the party circuit overdressed for life."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032871.txt_3061
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032871.txt
subject: Re: The book on you...
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "no"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2016, at 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "are you still getting calls from reporters re Trump?"}, {"sender": "Story <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:47 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "every day"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:54 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "everyone except the NYT it seems:) yes or no question: does he win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "6/1/2016 4:00:04 PM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "ask me august"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032507.txt_3075
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032507.txt
subject: Re: Masa
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "Have you met Masa yet? Seems to me he is a person you should know and you are a person he should know.\n\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/03/business/dealbook/masayoshi-son-sprint-and-a-bet-on-the-trump-economy.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:17 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "have not met"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/3/2017 4:26:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "Seems to me he is a natural guy for you; he is going to be in Florida in March for some Trump event. I know some of his financial guys pretty well: I might try to facilitate something if you are not opposed."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023062.txt_3077
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023062.txt
subject: Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": "GMAX <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 08:37:01 -0800", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 05:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032513.txt_3091
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032513.txt
subject: Re: Meeting
messages:
  [{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/6/2017 5:54:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Meeting", "body": "Crazy new re Trump claims on wiretapping\nIs he loco ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 6, 2017, at 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Meeting", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 1:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Meeting", "body": "Are you in the US ?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030802.txt_3104
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030802.txt
subject: Re: privieged
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff <michaelwolff@???>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "lots of reporters inquiries. !. doithink that trump set me up? what do i know about his dealings? . did i speak to you? suggestion. all public record, house bought out of a bankruptcy proceding . I was the stalking horse bid.. never before was there a prosecution of erotic massage by women for money in someones home. every girl got money. returned . most interviewed by police over 21. all public record. .some concern on my team that i will get a cong subpoena. doi have to wear a tie?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:13 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "Again! Why you need a team in place! Where are you with Ollie?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:17 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "hes great. he needs to get the documents from the law firms that are wholly focused on this submission to the judge. . BTW He asked for Imilllion per month . for a year. ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:24 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "Expensive. But... In a way this new round of calls is an opportunity: reporters suddenly thinking they don't know something or that there is a new angle—now would be a good moment to hit them with a better prepared set of responses. Somebody, Ollie or otherwise, should get started on this."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 11:43:25 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "https://www.rawstory.com/2019/05/new-book-paints-sordid-picture-of-trump-real-estate-deal-involving-russian-oligarch-and-jeffrey-epstein/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032865.txt_3110
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032865.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Gerald Barton", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jeffrey, \nI am certainly glad that you have thick skin and care little about what the press says. I am sorry that you \nhave to appear tolerant against intolerance. \nFrom all appearances, you fulfill the challenge of Kipling when he said: \n\"If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue, \nOr walk with Kings - nor lose the common touch, \nIf neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you, \nIf all men count with you, but none too much.\" \nIn spite of outward appearances, I know very few know how you really feel and I can only hope that that \nfeeling is shown best in the naming of your airplane. \nJerru"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Gerald Barton"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how are you"}, {"sender": "Gerald Barton", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:53 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "My Extraordinarily Talented, Outrageous Friend, \nThank you for asking how I am doing. The short answer is very well. I hope that you are in good health and \ncontinue to use your special talents to make the world a better place and for your somewhat unique \namusements. \nThe longer answer to your question is that at the end of 2014 I closed down the office of Landmark, transferred \nall of the assets to pay all of the major creditors, except me, and found myself as broke as I was when you first \ncalled me that Friday after Thanksgiving, with my only remaining assets, a large capital loss, my reputation, \nand my energy. \nSince then, our luck has been better than even an optimist like me would expect. Being free of the $500,000 a \nday I was fined by the OTS, after several years they abandoned this fine, which was initiated strictly to ensure \nthat I had no opportunity to finance any new developments, I became involved with an extraordinary, large, \nimportant real estate development in Oklahoma City and two others in the D.C. area. \nThe bad news is that my dear friend and good partner, Aubrey McClendon, was killed in a single car accident \non March 2nd of this year and the development with great potential is now either delayed or abandoned. The \ngood news is that our involvement in a 1,000 acre development on Deep Creek Lake in western Maryland is in \nthe process of being financed and should be underway sometime this summer. Our second project is a 405 \nacre development in Harper's Ferry, West Virginia, that is probably the prettiest piece of property I know of in \nthe U.S. that is zoned and developable. Its business plan is now underway and we should be in the financing \nmode this fall. My impression is that there is a tremendous amount of money on the sidelines, but the top 5% \nor 10% that control it are terribly frightened of losing money they don't need, while the 90% to 95% of the \ncitizens are continuing their daily labors somewhat frightened that they are not certain where next month's or \nnext year's mortgage payment is coming from. \nOn a lighter note, Donald Trump recently bought our development in Ireland, Doonbeg Golf Club. It has been \nrated the first or second best resort in Europe. To-date, to my surprise, he is managing it reasonably well, \nprobably because he is presently devoted to an endeavor that amuses him. \nJeffrey, I want you to understand that I am extremely pleased and not at all melancholy about my present \ncircumstances. Whenever I get an opportunity, I always visit those assets I helped create and almost without \nexception, I wish I had been smarter, but generally satisfied that I made a positive contribution and one much \nhigher than normally done by my competitors, because I am fortunate that the labor focus of my life has not \nattracted the best and the brightest. \nWhen good fortune brings you to the D.C. area, please let me know. I always enjoy understanding your \nactivities and do so with amazement and amusement. \nJerry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Gerald Barton"], "timestamp": "5/17/2016 1:56:20 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thanks for filling me in"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031642.txt_3128
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031642.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Got it.\nNow remember\nPress is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Oct 9, 2016, at 8:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "no, im out of it. donald brought out four women that said bill abused them. / they wilil feature in the\nhillary says you should give the benefit of the doubt to victims. I laid this out for you over dinner, its\ndisgraceful, but. here we are"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Times bad. R u around Tuesday?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "No , -phone today?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 10:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Can call circa 11"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 3:26:54 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 3:26:54 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "What number"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027034.txt_3145
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027034.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/17/2013 8:55:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "23rd -yes. 24th probably but early. I have Clinton GI on 9am and fly to Singapore on 3pm. Lets discuss it tomorrow. Best EB"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 16, 2013, at 21:55", "subject": "Re:", "body": "can you do breakfast with ariane rothscild on morinig of 23. and if you wnat kissinger china guy at brakfast 24."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029098.txt_3149
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029098.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nowak, Martin A.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/25/2017 12:57:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will talk to here this morning\nher Skype contact is in moscow.\nis this correct?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nowak, Martin A."], "timestamp": "Jul 25, 2017, at 6:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Progress?"}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 5:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Still waiting Nowak to respond about when he can call(I'll keep following up with him, not a prob)\n\nFound this looking for the details of what is happening with the federal budget for science\n\nhttps://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/115th-congress/house-report/231\n\nHere's a list of outlets to approach about what you are going to bridge the funding gap:\n\n* MIT Technology Review\n* Nature\n* Washington Post\n* Science\n* Wall Street Journal\n* WIRED\n\nTopic to approach\nhttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-21/for-the-impact-of-trump-slashing-science-funding-look-north?utm_content=politics&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&cmpid=socialflow-twitter-politics"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031656.txt_3150
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031656.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kensington2"], "timestamp": "11/27/2016 5:54:15 PM", "subject": null, "body": "I will not come this week, too many trump issues. . anything new. exciting. has mr kiss come to reality?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031130.txt_3151
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031130.txt
subject: Fwd: Public work vs private AMAZING
messages:
  [{"sender": "ed thompson", "recipients": ["Joseph Bernstein"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 03, 2012 6:03 PM", "subject": "Fw: Public work vs private AMAZING", "body": "There are actually two messages here. The first is very interesting, but the second is absolutely astounding - and explains a lot.\n\nA recent \"Investor's Business Daily\" article provided very interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health organization.\n\nPercentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis:\n\nU.S. 65%\nEngland 46%\nCanada 42%\n\nPercentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received treatment within six months:\n\nU.S. 93%\nEngland 15%\nCanada 43%\n\nPercentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months:\n\nU.S. 90%\nEngland 15%\nCanada 43%\n\nPercentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month:\n\nU.S. 77%\nEngland 40%\nCanada 43%\n\nNumber of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:\n\nU.S. 71\nEngland 14\nCanada 18\n\nPercentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in \"excellent health\":\n\nU.S. 12%\nEngland 2%\nCanada 6%\n\nAnd now for the last statistic:\nNational Health Insurance?\nU.S. NO\nEngland YES\nCanada YES\nCheck this last set of statistics!!\tThe percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private \tbusiness sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet. You know what the private business sector is \ta real-life business, not a government job Here are the percentages.\nT. Roosevelt..................... \t38%\nTaft.................................. \t40%\nWilson ............................. \t52%\nHarding........................... \t49%\nCoolidge.......................... \t48%\nHoover............................ \t42%\nF. Roosevelt.................... \t50%\nTruman............................ \t50%\nEisenhower...................... \t57%\nKennedy.......................... \t30%\nJohnson........................... \t47%\nNixon............................... 53%\nFord................................ 42%\nCarter............................. 32%\nReagan............................ 56%\nGH Bush......................... 51%\nClinton ........................... 39%\nGW Bush........................ 55%\nObama..................... 8%\nThis helps to explain the incompetence of this administration:\nonly 8% of them have ever worked in private business!\nThat's right! Only eight percent---the least, by far, of the\nlast 19 presidents! And these people are trying to tell our big\ncorporations how to run their business?\nHow can the president of a major nation and society, the one\nwith the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about business when\nhe's never worked for one? Or about jobs when he has never really had one? And when it's the same for\n92% of his senior staff and closest advisers? They've spent most of their time in academia,\ngovernment and/or non-profit jobs or as \"community organizers.\" They should have been in an employment\nline\nPass this on because we'll NEVER see these facts in the main\nstream media."}, {"sender": "John Connolly Ed.D.", "recipients": ["RALPH BERNSTEIN", "Morad Tahbaz"], "timestamp": "August 4, 2012 3:54:25 PM GMT+02:00", "subject": "FW: Public work vs private AMAZING", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "8/14/2012 1:05:43 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Public work vs private AMAZING", "body": "This is crazy please read it and pass it on!!!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032681.txt_3152
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032681.txt
subject: Re: You around today
messages:
  [{"sender": "Shanson900", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 8:44 AM", "subject": "Re: You around today", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 24, 2017, at 9:02 AM", "subject": "Re: You around today", "body": "yes now?"}, {"sender": "Stephen Hanson", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/24/2017 2:21:03 PM", "subject": "Re: You around today", "body": "FYI. Need to go long way. Trump"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033157.txt_3160
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033157.txt
subject: Fwd: Why Palm Beach, Florida Is The 'New Greenwich' For Wall Streeters
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/21/2014 10:51:27 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Why Palm Beach, Florida Is The 'New Greenwich' For Wall Streeters", "body": ""}, {"sender": "BRYAN SUBOTNICK", "recipients": ["Subotnick Stuart", "iE Prosperi Paul"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 21, 2014 4:35 pm", "subject": "Why Palm Beach, Florida Is The 'New Greenwich' For Wall Streeters", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022819.txt_3170
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022819.txt
subject: Re: Viceland
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg <M1.1>", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:30 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Viceland", "body": "Fyi\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 13, 2018, at 3:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 14, 2018, at 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "8/14/2018 2:09:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030244.txt_3174
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030244.txt
subject: Re: we will be having dinnr with him on sunday
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/22/2011 10:14:55 PM", "subject": "Re: we will be having dinnr with him on sunday", "body": "Bozhe Moi!!\nHope I'll handle my utensils:))"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2011 12:09 PM", "subject": "Re: we will be having dinnr with him on sunday", "body": "Gergen went on to become the Director of Communications for President Gerald Ford and President Ronald Reagan, a counselor on domestic and foreign affairs for President Bill Clinton and his Secretary of State, Warren Christopher, and an adviser to the 1980 George H.W. Bush presidential campaign.\n\nDee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee a"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033212.txt_3182
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033212.txt
subject: FW: CNN Article
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["'jeffrey E.' [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/6/2017 2:26:34 PM", "subject": "FW: CNN Article", "body": "Jeffrey — I thought this article on Tom would interest u -- Nick\nhttp://www.cnn.com/2017/01/06/politics/tom-barrack-donald-trump-inauguration/index.html\n\nDonald Trump's power broker\nwww.cnn.com\nTom Barrack is poised to wield enormous influence in\nDonald Trump's Washington as the person perhaps closest\nto the new president outside of his immediate family."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033206.txt_3191
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033206.txt
subject: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "12/14/2016 2:34:21 AM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "President Elect arrives Palm Beach on Friday 9pm ish,. \nHe also has a day trip Saturday departing PBI at 9am,. And returning 4pm,. \nJust fyi for your Friday arrival time. \nThx \nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029958.txt_3192
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029958.txt
subject: I beat Bush
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeyacations@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/3/2016 1:15:33 PM", "subject": "I beat Bush", "body": "Hi Jeffrey, \nI got more votes than Jeb Bush got in Iowa, and I only had one congressional district, he had four!! It's so funny (to me — \ntotally embarrassing to him)!!! Still like Trump 0 and might be a delegate to the republican convention. \nWas in St. Thomas for a couple of days — did call this island, but never heard back. Went scuba diving off St. Jeff and it \nwas beautiful. Would be totally funny (to me at least) if you put a big fake shark or statute under the water where the \ndivers go.... \nLove ya, \nINW"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026188.txt_3194
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026188.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "enjoy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will return to new york wednesday or tues day night ."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "that is nice of you .. you keep hosting us .. we need to see you in kuwait ..\nwill write more once i arrive and see my dear old man sunday"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i dont know your plans but of course you are always invited to visit. florida. if1am here"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017 at 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how long will you stay in new york how long will the old man be there?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i got to ny today .. i hope you are having good time, as for my boss he is leaving tuesday .. i m travelling back to europe tomorrow, if not, monday for sure. lets hope that we see you next in kuwait &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If you think wise I could come to New York sunday evening and also leave tues"}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/24/2017 8:20:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i didnt understand what you mean? do you want me to stay? or you want to see my boss?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031507.txt_3201
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031507.txt
subject: Re: Saudi money
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "words that you to refer to one thing, USA. the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very\nuseful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress\nin addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even in tech, needs bio\ntech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are 20k members of a\ntribe. called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is focused on bin salman, or\nthe very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local costco... _ but they are aware that a\nmessage needs to be sent to their population , regarding the next 20 years,\n\nsocial media, and the selfie crowds post the best of everything, their cutest pictures the amazing\nfood , the luxury resorts. the masses see these things and as the difference between\nexpectations and reality widen, the anger grows. trump has tapped in.\n\nwith the passage of the 9 11 saudi bill, unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france\nthat revolted against their own aristocracty, with the internet and globalization of discontect it is now\nthe americans that can revolt against the saudi leadership. it is the americans that are demanding\nwomen drive. not the saudis"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have been called in to help on a big NYT investigation into how low oil prices have been\neffecting the personal finances of royal family in Saudi Arabia. Obviously they called in much"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed . and im not seeing much in the\nsecondary market. . blackrock is more money market , more like custodian than investor ."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "what is your back of the envelope guess as to much saudi money tied up in such funds?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "sorry, no good handle without digging"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:55 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have spoken to a lot of ceos of fund outfits who say Saudis have been pulling billions of dollars in\nseparate account money -- not just from BR. And plus I cant believe they would have so much tied\nup in lock ups."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "number"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 2:28:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029970.txt_3210
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029970.txt
subject: RE: Hello!!!
messages:
  [{"sender": "Gwendolyn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/25/2017 9:10:33 PM", "subject": "RE: Hello!!!", "body": "Thanks!!!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, June 25, 2017 4:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Hello!!!", "body": "Great news"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 4:53 PM", "subject": "Hello!!!", "body": "Hi Jeffrey, \nJust called, but not sure I have the right cell number for you. Thinking of you and hope life is treating you great! Any \nnews? \nAll good here in the District of Corruption — I'm lovin' Trump. He is turning this town on its head, and have to admit, \nI'm enjoying watching the action (except for the shooting, of course, which was tragic). Especially interesting is \nwatching the Dems implode — I'm really shocked at how wrong they judged the public. Am having dinner tonight with \none of the Blue Dog Dems, and think they could maneuver to take over the party — Rep. Jim Costa is the defacto head — \nwe'll see. Have popcorn, sitting back and watching the show 0 \nJust got a big promotion to Manager of Senior Health, Virginia Hospital Center/Mayo Clinic. Am very excited, and love \nthe job — it is so rewarding. I spend most of my time giving lectures on neurodegenerative diseases, sleep, heart health \nand strategies for longevity. And the rest of the time as liaison to State and local Department's of Aging, facilitator to \nthe Alzheimer and Dementia Caregiver Support Group and managing the assistive technology program. \nIf you hear of any special panels or commissions President Trump is forming, please keep me in mind. Sure the hospital \nwon't mind loaning me out, and pretty sure I'm one of a handful of Republican Gerontologists 0. \nLet me know if you get to DC. Would LOVE to see you!!! \nMiss you and all the great times we had xxxx \nGwendolyn \nPS. How are Fred and Mort doing? \nGerontologist, Longevity & Successful Aging"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022825.txt_3217
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022825.txt
subject: Re: off the record
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "1/9/2015 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "Landon. the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story, is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, \" he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never, it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/9/2015 2:17 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "Lets have a chat -- you do need to fight back some how. Present evidence that she is lying AND show the world that you are no longer that guy. You have made changes -- and that this is the past. My sense is that its TV type thing where you just talk honestly about this/present evidence that its not true/ and focus on what you have been doing for past five years. Charlie Rose? But you cant just sit there taking punches like this -- especially wen the British tabs are driving this. Maybe you go on British TV.... Call me any time."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "1/9/2015 6:20:08 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "number?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033180.txt_3219
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033180.txt
subject: Donald Trump Used Legally Dubious Method to Avoid Paying Taxes - The New York Times
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/2/2016 9:25:09 PM", "subject": "Donald Trump Used Legally Dubious Method to Avoid Paying Taxes - The New York Times", "body": "Very, very funny."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030631.txt_3220
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030631.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump is living proof of the adage that it is better to be lucky than smart."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015, at 10:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ill give you details when 1 see you, when are you in ny?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Going up to NY Friday morning. Think Iam going to drive. I will then stop to pee and get gas at a rest stop\non the New Jersey turnpike, will observe all of the people there who are at least 100 pounds overweight, will\nhave a mild panic attack as a result of the observation, and will then decide that I am not eating another bite\nof food for the rest of my life out of fear that I will end up like one of these people."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015, at 10:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what time , I will come up"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will leave @ 9, so will be in ny @ 1 pm."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 27, 2015, at 6:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ok , anytime you like, you can drive right to me and i will feed you.::)"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 27, 2015", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 27, 2015, at 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/27/2015 2:27:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031681.txt_3228
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031681.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "2/1/2019 7:20:44 PM", "subject": null, "body": "That Russian oligarch who spent that money on that property and never moved into it and ultimately tore it \ndown, he's also a large shareholder in a bank called the Bank of Cyprus, which has been implicated in Russian \nmoney laundering. The chairman of the Bank of Cyprus is the former CEO of Deutsche Bank, to which Donald \nTrump owed all that money at the time he conveniently got this very large influx of cash from a Russian guy. \nThe vice chairman of that bank until recently was our new secretary of commerce, long time Trump friend, \nWilbur Ross."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015585.txt_3235
source_file: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015585.txt
subject: Question from ABC
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Question from ABC", "body": "Is the full transcript of our telephone a rata ack Virginia part of the public record? TaKe TH\nI have a request from the press to provide it (se€ below), but I will only do that if it has been filed) °%"}, {"sender": "\"Hill, James E.\" <James.E.Hill@abe.com>", "recipients": ["Jack Scarola <JSX@SearcyLaw.com>"], "timestamp": "January 28, 2015 at 10:34:00 AM EST", "subject": "RE: Question from ABC", "body": "If possible - I'd also like to see full transcript of the 2011 phone interview you/Edwards conducted with VR\nwhile she was still in Australia."}, {"sender": "Hill, James E.", "recipients": ["Jack Scarola’"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 28, 2015 9:31 AM", "subject": "RE: Question from ABC", "body": "Thank you"}, {"sender": "Jack Scarola <JSX@SearcyLaw.com>", "recipients": ["Hill, James E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 28, 2015 7:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Question from ABC", "body": "You will receive a response and copy of the deposition later this morning."}, {"sender": "\"Hill, James E.\" <James.E.Hill@abe.com>", "recipients": ["Jack Scarola"], "timestamp": "Jan 27, 2015, at 10:00 PM", "subject": "Question from ABC", "body": "Hi Jack - sorry to trouble you.\n\nBut wondering if you know what documents are source for a new NY Daily News story - quoting what appears\nto be a Juan Alessi deposition which mentions Andrew visits to PB mansion.\n\nDaily News cites newly filed documents. I'm not aware of any new docs that quote Alessi on the issue of\nAndrew.\n\nCan u enlighten me?\nDo you have access to those portions of the Alessi depo? Not sure which case it would come from.\n\nhttp://m.nydailynews.com/news/national/prince-andrew-sex-massages-epstein-home-repairman-article-\n1.2094073"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022831.txt_3243
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022831.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story, is that she was\nat multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with\nhim, \" he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER\nthere, never, it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was\nfantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday \nexplaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs, \ntransferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated \nback here as \"reported fact.\" Problem with story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, \nand unlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, \nthey might. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources \nare public people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk \ntomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "anytime tomorw ok"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:22 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Can you talk at noon? Probably need about 30 minutes. What is best number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 10, 2015", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "now good?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Need 15"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 5:58:11 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "free now"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033194.txt_3245
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033194.txt
subject: Saudi Arabia warns Trump on blocking oil imports
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/16/2016 10:33:03 AM", "subject": "Saudi Arabia warns Trump on blocking oil imports", "body": "http://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/16/saudi-arabia-warns-trump-on-blocking-oi1-imports.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033564.txt_3265
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033564.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Ken Starr", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/19/2018 7:14:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ken, delighted to meet. Jeffrey has long told me about your friendship and the respect he has for you. If you send me your mailing address, it would be my pleasure to send you my recent book about the Trump White House. I'm now at work on a sequel focusing on the legal case against Trump and Trump's response to it. Any counsel and background you might provide would aid me enormously and enrich the book. I, of course, would be willing to talk with you on an entirely off-the-record basis or under any arrangement that suits. Thanks in advance and I look forward to the chance to chat. All best, Michael"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ken Starr", "Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 19, 2018 at 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ken - Michael , Michael/ Ken"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033202.txt_3266
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033202.txt
subject: SoftBank Pledges to Invest $50 Billion in U.S. After Meeting With Trump - WSJ
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/6/2016 10:57:20 PM", "subject": "SoftBank Pledges to Invest $50 Billion in U.S. After Meeting With Trump - WSJ", "body": "http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-says-softbank-pledges-to-invest-50-billion-in-u-s-1481053732"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029063.txt_3269
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029063.txt
subject: Re: interesting
messages:
  [{"sender": "Alain Forget Pa", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:12 AM", "subject": "Re: interesting", "body": "Donald Trump’s newly named chief strategist and senior counselor, Steve Bannon, laid\nout his global nationalist vision in unusually in-depth remarks delivered by Skype to a\nconference held inside the Vatican in the summer of 2014.\n\nWell before victories for Brexit and Trump seemed possible, Bannon declared there was\na “global tea party movement” and praised European far-right parties like Great\nBritain’s UKIP and France’s National Front. Bannon also suggested that a racist\nelement in far-right parties “all gets kind of washed out,” that the West was facing a\n“crisis of capitalism” after losing its “Judeo-Christian foundation,” and he blasted “crony\ncapitalists” in Washington for failing to prosecute bank executives over the financial\ncrisis.\n\nThe remarks — beamed into a small conference room in a 15th-century marble palace in\na secluded corner of the Vatican — were part of a 50-minute Q&A during a conference\nfocused on poverty hosted by the Human Dignity Institute, which BuzzFeed News\nattended as part of its coverage of the rise of Europe’s religious right. The group was\nfounded by Benjamin Harnwell, a longtime aide to Conservative member of the\nEuropean Parliament Nirj Deva to promote a “Christian voice” in European politics. The\ngroup has ties to some of the most conservative factions inside the Catholic\n\nChurch; Cardinal Raymond Burke, one of the most vocal critics of Pope Francis who\nwas ousted from a senior Vatican position in 2014, is chair of the group’s advisory\nboard."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 18, 2016, at 12:14 PM", "subject": "Re: interesting", "body": "your view?"}, {"sender": "Alain Forget", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/18/2016 11:30:28 AM", "subject": "Re: interesting", "body": "i do not believe in a global tea party...but it is most interesting to see how those ideas will materialize and to\nwitch exdend I Il be most interested to hear your point of wiew"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025814.txt_3275
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025814.txt
subject: Re: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional , emotional. and financial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "\"girls?\" careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any..... also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im or for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me... .just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "train? yes , i will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" welll he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "of course not, he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "free now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I think I should do it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "lets see how you feel sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Good advice."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 09:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "I don't want to give up my apartment in NY"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033216.txt_3276
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033216.txt
subject: Trump could tap tech entrepreneur Peter Thiel for Germany job: Report
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 3:25:48 PM", "subject": "Trump could tap tech entrepreneur Peter Thiel for Germany job: Report", "body": "http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/20/trump-could-tap-tech-entrepreneur-peter-thiel-for-germany-j ob -rep ort.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026198.txt_3285
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026198.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "that is nice of you .. you keep hosting us .. we need to see you in kuwait .."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how long will you stay in new york how long will the old man be there?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i got to ny today .. i hope you are having good time, as for my boss he is leaving tuesday .. i m travelling back to europe tomorrow, if not, monday for sure. lets hope that we see you next in kuwait &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If you think wise I could come to New York sunday evening and also leave tues"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i didnt understand what you mean? do you want me to stay? or you want to see my boss?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 1:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why are you up so early.? youneed rest. - !, I wanted you to know that If you think I should meet your boss in New York , where there is less pomp Icandoso. / are you having fun?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i didnt get a good rest this month .. i think it is better to meet him in kuwait .. man do you love cuba that much whenever you want .. november or before .. just send me an email and i will take care of your visit &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 1:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "perfect. Ill be in paris oct 6"}, {"sender": "Oe—SSCSCs", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/24/2017 10:46:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "enjoy it sheik jeffrey & &"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030609.txt_3289
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030609.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "hes great fun,"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends ,"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic TS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:34 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Thank you!\n\nI heard that he is not that fun but i trust your judgement. It would be blast that you are here. I was just flirting with 22 years old\nhot blond blue eyes mexican chick. It turns out she is with her husband. Did not have chance to check him out. But as we\nconcluded, anything good is rented ;)"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic TS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "No problem.\nI am meeting him as he has some questions. I do not need anything from him.\n\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic PO", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031517.txt_3294
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031517.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "25 Oct 2016, at 19:30", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Any news"}, {"sender": "Mark Loyd", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/25/2016 6:40:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "May have HBJ interested in a development in Kensington that could be purchased for £80m and there would be\n1.5% for me. So fingers crossed. Which way do you think the election will go? I had supper with Conrad B the\nother day who was praising Trump!!!"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "Sent from my iPad"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029960.txt_3299
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029960.txt
subject: RE: Hello
messages:
  [{"sender": "Gwendolyn Beck", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:42 AM", "subject": "Hello", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nHope all is well with you. Enjoying this political climate ? I moved from the Trump campaign to Kasich\nas there was a fabulous opportunity to be on his Advisory Committee for Elder Issues. Now, I'm going to try\nto get on with Trump as an advisor. He's going to have big problems with Trump University and the charge of\nSenior Financial Abuse in CA and FL.\n\nAlso, starting a new company helping Seniors age successfully, especially individuals with dementia - the\nearlier we catch it the better. I've been working with a memory center and individuals in DC and it's\nremarkable the results I've been able to achieve over the last year. Of course, only want to work with\npeople/families/guardians that are SERIOUS about getting the best care. I stress 'serious' because I don't want\nto get into a situation like as last summer.\n\nHow is Fred? It's just sad sad sad that instead of letting me help him, Joe had me fixing his watch and finding\na school for his son... I think of where Fred could be today, and instead he's probably locked up in his\napartment with no help that has dementia training — he probably thinks he's crazy by now. Know you like Joe,\nbut it was sad sad sad that he didn't let me do my job. Was it an intentional con? Very few things he said were\nthe truth (but, hey, people liked Bernie Madoff too)....\n\nAnyway — the past. I'm charging in the range of $1000 — 1500 per day plus expenses and it's all highly\nconfidential. A customized 'mind-body' enhancement to achieve the most out of one's life! And, training for\nthe family to help transition to the 'new reality' with their loved one with later stage dementia.\n\nI'm in NYC Friday for the annual meeting of the Circumnavigator's Club, and will stay over the\nweekend. Love to see you if you're in town! Would also like to have lunch with Fred - enjoyed his company -\nbut Joe probably won't let that happen CD .\n\nLove you! And wishing you Love and Happiness,\nGwendolyn\n\nPS. Any idea how to get rid of this damn smoking gun article? It's now the first thing you see when googling\nme..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Gwendolyn Beck"], "timestamp": "5/18/2016 10:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "impossisble to get rid of"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/18/2016 4:41:19 PM", "subject": "RE: Hello", "body": "That sucks...."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022835.txt_3302
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022835.txt
subject: Re: thoughts
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:36 AM", "subject": "Re: thoughts", "body": "Out of respect and love for my former girlfrend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never \nquestioned, or subpeonaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her \nname. however during the entire time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me \nalmost everywhere, each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers \nShe never saw anything that claims. She can confirm 1. I was never alone at the \nhouse. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained, not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2 , were local strippers, that \nwould call all the time asking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a \nserious love relationship, I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 \n- 24 at the time.. 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never \non the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on \nthe island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. . 7 She woudl acknowledge that these girls asked to \nbring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the \nterrace. ( no sex ). . they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked \nfor underage, that is crazy, . . 8 . answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage \npeople , men women, aged up to 60."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:54 AM", "subject": "Re: thoughts", "body": "I don't think I would put her out there. It probably seems too self-serving. But let's discuss. I have an idea about \nhow to best use. Do you have time to continue our conversation post-3:00 today or tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/16/2015 6:23:52 PM", "subject": "Re: thoughts", "body": "today ok."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031691.txt_3320
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031691.txt
subject: Re: from Jesse Kornbluth
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jesse Kornbluth", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Sat Apr 30 15:38:06 2011", "subject": "from Jesse Kornbluth", "body": "Peg As you've seen, I'm doing a piece for the Times. \nYou're briefly in it. \nPd like 3 minutes of your time, if possible. \nTurning it in late Sunday.... \nWe could do this by email. \nOr phone. \nI'm at \nIf I'm out, my cell is \nTHANKS \nJK"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Jesse Kornbluth"], "timestamp": "Apr 30, 2011, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re: from Jesse Kornbluth", "body": "Would love to talk to you. What is piece about? Peg"}, {"sender": "Jesse Kornbluth", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Sat Apr 30 16:29:18 2011", "subject": "Re: from Jesse Kornbluth", "body": "Peg --\nObviously, I'm sharing what follows on the assumption that everything here is just between us. \nThe thesis of the Times piece is that the rich and their corporations have SO much power \nthat we no longer live in a democracy. \nCan \"we the people\" make change? Not really. \nWho can? The rich and powerful. \nHuh? All they want is the status quo. Or more. \nBut they could --- okay, its not likely, but they could --- turn on the bad actors at their social/economic level. \nFor example: Wall Street CEOs, donors to the Tea Party, etc. \nThat's the topic. Shaming. Shunning. \nOne of the people I deal with --- there are several others. --- is Jeffrey Epstein. \nReading the clips, I don't see that Jeffrey as been shunned. \nIn this piece --- http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-\nsociety-friends-close-ranks/ ---\nI read: \nThe crowd at the events top publicist Peggy Siegal has organized for Epstein proves the point, at least behind closed doors. \"I and \nmany others that know him describe him as brilliant,\" says Siegal. \n\"His unique mind is what attracts the world's smartest people to his home.\" Last September, with Siegal's help, Epstein hosted a Break \nFast after Yom Kippur. A group of 120 friends brought their children over for a buffet dinner \nThis was just a few months after he finished his prison obligations in Florida. \nAnd here he is, entertaining --- with children present. \nThis Break Fast is one of a number of social events involving post-prison Jeffrey that attracted celebrated, powerful people. \nOf course I have zero idea who said, \"NO WAY\" and didn't cross his doorway. \nMy questions are: \n1) I You have known him for decades, were/are friends, etc. \nWhy was your reaction to his crimes to continue being his friend --- and not in a covert way? \n2) What would he have had to do for you to shun him --- to cut him out of your life? \nYou're the ultimate professional; you may not want to respond. \nEspecially because I'm NOT reaching out to anyone else who's named in the piece. \nI don't care about them. \nBut it ain't me to blindside you. \nJK"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, 30 Apr 2011 16:59:25 -0400", "subject": "Fw: from Jesse Kornbluth", "body": "Jesse Kornbluth could never make a dime. He is an angry loser who was married to years ago.(She now is married to \nJoe Allen and they live near you in PB) left him because there was no bread on the table and he is nasty. \nWhat should I do? Call him or not? Peg"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Sat Apr 30 17:15:27 2011", "subject": "Re: from Jesse Kornbluth", "body": "Peggy, did you want me to send this to JE?"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/30/2011 9:20:14 PM", "subject": "Re: from Jesse Kornbluth", "body": "Absolutely."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019109.txt_3323
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019109.txt
subject:
  FW: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Players2 .", "Michael", "Charles", "ROGER STONE"], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT", "subject": "JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "CHILD RAPE BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN NEW TELL ALL JAMES PATTERSON BOOK FEDS COVER UP NO FED ARREST OF MASS CHILD RAPIST BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN BOOK RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 !!!!!\nSTEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE JAMES PATTERSON BOOK WRITING TEAM.\nWIN PRESIDENT TRUMP .............\nSTEVEN HOFFENBERG IS TAKING BACK THE NEW YORK POST NEWSPAPER OPERATIONS !!!!!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033184.txt_3331
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033184.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peter Mandelson <i >"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 6 November 2016 at 19:15", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "63 years old. . you made it"}, {"sender": "Peter Mandelson", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just. | have decided to extend my life by spending more of it in the US"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peter Mandelson <i >"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 6 November 2016 at 19:42", "subject": "Re:", "body": "in the donald white house"}, {"sender": "Peter Mandelson", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What’s the donald white house ? And how are you ?"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peter Mandelson <j >"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 6 November 2016 at 20:32", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump/ and having agreat deal of fun. in hindsight. you were right about staying away from andrew. | was right in your staying with rinaldo"}, {"sender": "Peter Mandelson [is", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/6/2016 8:36:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Of course, donald in WH. Will he get there ?\n\nYes, without Andrew it would not have gone nuclear. Did you advise me to stay with R ? Such a handful but loyal and never embarrassing."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030635.txt_3332
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030635.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/24/2016 10:49:32 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is this the right # says its disconnected"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 24, 2016, at 6:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "5616557625"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 24 June 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Where are you? Not answering your cell\nWhat the f... Does going to open 1k down not good... Trump is saying its a great thing really???"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032652.txt_3335
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032652.txt
subject: Re: Marilyn
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "Will you want to bring back Marilyn or Carluz/Arline for the week you are in NY?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "at the moment we will go to lsh on sunday the 26th early then to new york where i will stay the week, larry , it will be and I, trump is in town that week,"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "Reminder: Jojo and Merwin both requested off Nov. 25 and 26 to be with family in town and celebrate Brianna's 16th Birthday. We will need to bring Marilyn to NY to help prepare for your arrival. We should have Sonam and Leo to help as well. Shall we get a flight for Marilyn early Sat. Nov. 25th morning?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 17, 2017, at 6:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "i will show up at aroudn 11 pm sunday so plenty of time"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/17/2017 11:56:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "OK,...and are you OK with Larry getting you a car to take you to 71st upon landing at Teterboro on No. 26th?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032861.txt_3340
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032861.txt
subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about: \nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be \nable to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. \nIn a sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. \nI have some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience. \nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal \nopportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting \nyou frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you \ndecidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is \nabout your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and \ntechnical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something \nalong the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and \nperhaps some social media efforts. \nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and \ninterests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, \nexpensive effort. \nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and \nConnolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that \nPatterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll \nsurely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle \nwill amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've \nencountered before. \nMeanwhile--\nIn a lawyer's letter, I'd suggest including the following points--not necessarily legal, but a warning about how \na press campaign might unfold (publishers are more worried about being caught in negative media \ncontroversy than they are of legal threats): \n1) Little, Brown has made on the record representations to at least one well-known journalist that it was not \npublishing a book by James Patterson about Jeffrey Epstein--possibly an effort to avoid inquiries about the \nquestionable nature of the book; \n2) The actual author of the book, John Connolly, is someone other than the stated author, James Patterson. \nConnolly is known to have developed an obsession with Epstein, such that, his longtime employer, Vanity \nFair, has refused to allow him to write about Epstein for the magazine; \n3) Sources have confirmed for us that Patterson has had little more than a minimal consulting role in the \nbook, and that Connolly has functioned in every material way as the book's researcher and writer. We believe \nPatterson's \"authorship\" of the book will not stand up to scrutiny. And, indeed, that the entire notion of an \nextension of the Patterson franchise into nonfiction, as it has been used in fiction and children's book--\neffectively other authors writing under the Patterson name—presents a host of journalism ethical issues."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 18, 2016 11:41 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 4:58:46 PM", "subject": "Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030216.txt_3342
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030216.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "2/7/2017 7:18:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what would you do in order to consolidate the movement. music icons. personalites. etc? did you get \n\nyour first installment. ? did you send the poster"}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "James Drougas", "recipients": ["Paul"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Paul. I've been spending lots of time with Irwin Corey and his family past two weeks especially. He \nwas in hospital until the last week and then He died a few hours ago peacefully at home in bed. Last night he \ntold me Trump will be assassinated soon. He was eager to learn the news each day. I asked him if he would \njoin the anti Trump rallies when he gains strength. Doctors thought he might live many months. Alas he was \nlaughing and smiling till the end and frowning about Trump. \n\nWarm and loving regards \n\nJim Drougas \n\nMy friend Alana, a young comedian, was here with him most nights. Irwin used to say he will live to 147. \nAlana explained that 102 is 147 in comedian years."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026474.txt_3343
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026474.txt
subject:
  Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration 'justifiably concerned' about sharing Intel with Trump team - POLITICO

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "2/24/2018 1:02:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration 'justifiably concerned' about sharing Intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "spent two hours on conference. with her yesterday. the flynn focus was clever"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <I 1>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration 'justifiably concerned' about sharing Intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classified-intelligence-michael-flynn-trump-423437"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030806.txt_3349
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030806.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bo)"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 29, 2011 1:35 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor , are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon\nnight.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but i think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/29/2011 12:36:57 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Agree!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032517.txt_3363
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032517.txt
subject: Masa...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/9/2017 3:21:50 PM", "subject": "Masa...", "body": "Trying to get you in with Masa crowd. Some resistance though, due to all the headlines/controversy --\nas you might expect. I tell them about your relationship with Saudis/Gates/Trump crowd, but still\ndoubts. Working on it!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026312.txt_3365
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026312.txt
subject: Steve Bannon had morning with disgraced Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peter Thomas Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, August 12 2018 05:23 PM", "subject": "Steve Bannon had morning with disgraced Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Great picture of you! ! ! \nhttps://pagesix.com/2018/08/1 1 /steve- bannon-trying-to-get-on-disgraced-jeffrey-epsteins-good-side/?utm source=maropost &utm medium=email &utm campaign=pagesixdaily &utm content=20 180812  \n&mpweb=755- 7237853-719173670  \nSteve Bannon trying to get on disgraced \nJeffrey Epstein's good side"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029021.txt_3368
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029021.txt
subject: interesting
messages:
  [{"sender": "Alain Forget", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/18/2016 11:12:27 AM", "subject": "interesting", "body": "Donald Trump's newly named chief strategist and senior counselor, Steve Bannon, laid out his global nationalist vision in unusually in-depth remarks delivered by Skype to a conference held inside the Vatican in the summer of 2014. Well before victories for Brexit and Trump seemed possible, Bannon declared there was a \"global tea party movement\" and praised European far-right parties like Great Britain's UKIP and France's National Front. Bannon also suggested that a racist element in far-right parties \"all gets kind of washed out,\" that the West was facing a \"crisis of capitalism\" after losing its \"Judeo-Christian foundation,\" and he blasted \"crony capitalists\" in Washington for failing to prosecute bank executives over the financial crisis. The remarks — beamed into a small conference room in a 15th-century marble palace in a secluded corner of the Vatican — were part of a 5o-minute Q&A during a conference focused on poverty hosted by the Human Dignity Institute, which BuzzFeed News attended as part of its coverage of the rise of Europe's religious right. The group was founded by Benjamin Harnwell, a longtime aide to Conservative member of the European Parliament Nirj Deva to promote a \"Christian voice\" in European politics. The group has ties to some of the most conservative factions inside the Catholic Church; Cardinal Raymond Burke, one of the most vocal critics of Pope Francis who was ousted from a senior Vatican position in 2014, is chair of the group's advisory board. BuzzFeed News originally posted a transcript beginning 90 seconds into the then-Breitbart News chairman's remarks because microphone placement made the opening mostly unintelligible, but we have completed the transcript from a video of the talk on YouTube. You can hear the whole recording at the bottom of the post. Here is what he said, unedited:"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030570.txt_3369
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030570.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley", "_________________________________"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 4 2011 10:51 AM", "subject": null, "body": "mary's great ,thanks.. I will call her again today. my suggestion for T is out of the box ( how unusual ).. 1. I still think that the only really qualified person is Jamie. knowledge of system, ddreivatives. banking operations both domestic and intl. . Personality issues are the key. ..AS that seems diofficult 2 I THink it would behoove Obama to make Bill CLinton Treasury sec.. and move Hillary out. of state. , Bill will be able to explain to the public and he world complex issues.. Unlike Jamie he could not craft them, but in todays internet world the message and how itis delivered is as important.."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032503.txt_3380
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032503.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thorbjørn Jagland", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/19/2017 7:54:56 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is It possible for you to pass by Strasbourg, it would be great. I really need to understand more about Trump\nand what's going on in the American society."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "fre. 17. feb. 2017 kl. 21.27", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im in paris until thurs? you?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025169.txt_3386
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025169.txt
subject: Re: Your Special Day
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:07 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nCongratulations on another spin around the sun.\n\nI would like to offer you a birthday present: my best efforts for a few hours on something where I might be able to contribute either to making something good happen for you or help you prevent the bad.\n\nWe haven't talked much at all for quite some time, so I'm not sure of the nature of your current interests but here are some of mine, where I feel I either have some special capability or can get access to those who have such.\n\n* open science -- open access publishing, data publishing, and open culture institutions considered as a network with largely consistent and mutually reinforcing values: Public Library of Science (PLoS), Wikipedia, Internet Archive, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Creative Commons, along with allied US, UK, European governmental and NGO funding sources and other institutions.\n* early-stage life science-based ventures, especially those with one or more of these technologies: optics, wearable-sensors, brain-computer interface, behavioral engineering that goes beyond robo-noodging. I am not up to speed on synthetic bio and CRISPR, but I have a good friend who is.\n* cybersecurity for you and your life. I have carefully monitored the web for articles about you and I have reason to think that those will persist indefinitely. I would be remiss as your friend if I did not encourage you to be as diligent and smart as possible in using tools like Signal, two-factor/multi-factor authentication, taking webmail archives off the web onto your own secure privately maintained archive or deleted (unlike Podesta), and other measures.\n* publicity for your cool-ass creative and important philanthropy in support of really good and adventuresome, high-risk basic science research. Most obvious benefit: it would be nice to know you hung out with the bright"}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "At 10:13 PM 01/19/17, you wrote:\n\nall good. thx. areas of interest: 1. distributions in nature. 2. deception. 3. sleep. 4. power. 5 money. 6 music and the brain. 7, signal intelligence in the biological systems\n\nExcellent alignment with some of my interests or those of people I like and think are smart!\n\nThe rest of the truncated message has been sent.\n\n1. What's been stimulating as a source of good questions for the \"distributions in nature\" issue?\n7. \"Signal intelligence in biol. systems\" seems to cover all of neurophysiology: Jonathan Victor, whom you met a few years ago in your office, is powerfully thoughtful on the issues of neural coding. Are there specific examples that have stimulated you to better questions or turned your thinking around?\n6. Are you aware of apps that purport to play music to enhance productivity and focus on tasks at hand? My buddy Reese Jones has backed that; he has a fascinating set of beliefs and projects around what may soon be understood as \"consciousness hacking.\" He's on the board of Singularity University as one of the founders. (His father was a pioneer UCSF MD researcher of hallucinogens, I believe!)\n\nMore to come in a day or so.\n\nThanks!\n\nYou're up late or you're not so east of my SF location!\n\nDavid\n\nPS How to trade the Trump-GOP demolition of the welfare state, erratic elevation of risks of trade disruptions and war? Has anyone from the rational center or left given thought to how to respond to a national emergency to cope with a kakistocratic seizure of emergency powers? The Patriot Act was on a 'shelf as you know, ready to be used. What should the better folks in this country have at hand if, say, a port is subject to a radiological attack of unknown origin?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 2:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "1. is probability a force rather than a market. if you look at a bell curve from scratch, it looks as if it under a force pushing things towards the center. i think gravity might be just that. 2. all signals in nature need to be encrypted so that the enemy cannot read. this includes inner signals that if you are aware of , can give you up to your predator. so signals from the nose , my conjecture is that each person has its own encryption de encryption algorithm built in. fyi having dinner with Jim Watson."}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Probability as a force rather than a what?\n\nDidn't suss out the next word...\n\nWatson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism when I saw him talk —4 years ago on book tour @Google. I met him once through Gunther Stent, as well as Crick on another occasion. Know him well?\n\nD."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 12:10:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "pretty well"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026512.txt_3390
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026512.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff a"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 2:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if the republicans pull this off, steve would deserve most of the credit. . he was way out in front on this way out. .. execution not to his liking but...... on another note , what were you thinking about me in the book, with what moniker"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was thinking of opening with you and Bannon talking about Trump. Would let you sound smart and offer what I think would be a crowd-pleasing perspective, and make you seem like a credible player--former friend of Trump, advisor to world leaders, sought after person, etc--without having to too much rehash old stuff.\n\nDoesn't seem like they can win...but who knows. I'm meeting Bannon had 3 tomorrow and will stay with him until the end."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff a"], "timestamp": "11/5/2018 8:23:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "take photos"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026460.txt_3395
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026460.txt
subject: Re: TSA PBI
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "11/21/2017 12:44:39 AM", "subject": "Re: TSA PBI", "body": "we will have others get names from lesley."}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 7:23 PM", "subject": "Re: TSA PBI", "body": "Jeffrey \nWhile Trump is in PBI, TSA only allows arrival and departures between 8am and 5pm for General Aviation. \nI made a resv for Nov 26th at 8am to St Thomas\nPassengers: You and \nI can make passenger changes up to 24 Hours before Departure, they also request if we are traveling with an \nanimal., FYI, \nThey also ask if Passengers are Male or Female, strange, they didn't ask names. \nThx \nLarry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033153.txt_3408
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033153.txt
subject: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "drsra", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/11/2011 2:33:58 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "So, are you on his campaign committee and what part of the organizing are you responisble for? I know you are\njust dying to help."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026173.txt_3411
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026173.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["q"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only you please"}, {"sender": "q", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thnx jeff ..im prayingpiabid"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the book worked. :)"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, at 11:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im certain you understand - I'm sure you will have a great new year . No need to respond"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hey shiek .. 1 will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night .. if you bussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["-"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 11:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "in florida ,"}, {"sender": "-", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "enjoy’"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 1:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will return to new york wednesday or tues day night ."}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/22/2017 2:43:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. safe travel"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026448.txt_3413
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026448.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "7/16/2017 12:38:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "funny"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 8:23 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Saw Matt C with DJT at golf tournament I know why he was there"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031652.txt_3416
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031652.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Oct 9, 2016, at 8:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no, im out of it. donald brought out four women that said bill abused them. / they wilil feature in the\nhillary says you should give the benefit of the doubt to victims. I laid this out for you over dinner, its\ndisgraceful, but. here we are"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got it.\nNow remember\nPress is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ehud in on sun pritzker mon. you around? dinner woody sunday. or have you gone dark"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Times bad. R u around Tuesday?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No , -phone today?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 10:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can call circa 11"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016 at 10:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What number"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "11/13/2016 1:09:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "today?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027030.txt_3418
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027030.txt
subject: Pritzker Alert
messages:
  [{"sender": "\"Kaczorowski, Monice M.\"", "recipients": ["\"Eisenberg, Marshall E.\"", "\"Richman, Lawrence I.\""], "timestamp": "May 22, 2013, 8:54:07 PM CDT", "subject": "Pritzker Alert", "body": "WashingtonPost.com\nCopyright 2013 The Washington Post\nMay 22, 2013\nSection: in-the-loop\nObama nominee Penny Pritzker's $80 million mistake\nPresident Obama's billionaire nominee to head the Commerce Department, Penny Pritzker, understated her\nincome by $80 million.\nEmily Heil\nHey, these things happen: Penny Pritzker, President Obama's nominee to lead the Commerce Department,\nunderstated her income by some $80 million and had to file a correction to her government-filed disclosures,\nBloomberg is reporting.\nThat might sound like a lot of money, but it's all relative. Pritzker, whose family founded the Hyatt hotel chain,\nis worth about $1.5 billion. So it's easy to see how a few million — or 80 — could go missing.\nMaybe she left it in the other purse?\nA spokeswoman told Bloomberg that the $80 million was \"a substantial amount\" and that Pritzker's advisers\ncorrected the error as soon as they realized it.\nPer Bloomberg: \"Documents released last week show Pritzker received $32.2 million for a decade's worth of\nconsulting on the restructuring of domestic trusts,\" but new filings indicated she made at least $80 million more\nthan that."}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["\"Eisenberg, Marshall E.\""], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2013 11:15 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Pritzker Alert", "body": "I clearly did something wrong in my last life to have to deal w this bullshit. AND I warned her."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 22, 2013 11:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Pritzker Alert", "body": "nice to see you, please come more often"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/23/2013 11:45:14 AM", "subject": "RE: Pritzker Alert", "body": "Always fun."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031646.txt_3438
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031646.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers <lsummers@harvard.edu>"], "timestamp": "Oct 9, 2016, at 8:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no, im out of it. donald brought out four women that said bill abused them. / they wilil feature in the\nhillary says you should give the benefit of the doubt to victims. I laid this out for you over dinner, its\ndisgraceful, but. here we are"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got it.\nNow remember\nPress is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ehud in on sun pritzker mon. you around? dinner woody sunday. or have you gone dark"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Times bad. R u around Tuesday?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No , -phone today?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can call circa 11"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:05:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "???"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029088.txt_3440
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029088.txt
subject: Re: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "ji@media.mit.edu", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/3/2017 3:16:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Can't seem to open the attachment...\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ji@media.mit.edu"], "timestamp": "Feb 2, 2017, at 20:24", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 6:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Dear Jeffrey\nTwo questions.\n\n1—do you believe the stock market will continue to climb given what we have now seen of Trump-land?\n[Strictly confidential]\n\n2—what do you think of the attached (N=1)? You do not drink or smoke, probably do not inject etc. you swim\nor exercise every day, so your heartbeat is expected to be low and less variable than average. Is your ability to\npredict heart rate accurately—without holding your neck or wrist—positively related to your ability to succeed\nin the financial world—as the attached strongly suggests. Just give me and N=1.\n\nRemember you asked me, what does self-knowledge have to do with anything—and here is a most intriguing\nexample.\n\nI will send you a joke shortly\nAll best\n\nbob"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026167.txt_3445
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026167.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 7:09:23 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf .. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well . congragulations"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031120.txt_3446
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031120.txt
subject: Tom McMillen
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/22/2013 10:45:31 PM", "subject": "Tom McMillen", "body": "Hi Jeffrey, \nI saw Tom McMillen last night and he asked about you - said he lost touch. He's tight with the Obama's and is going to be \nan Ambassador - apparently any country he wants. So great! I'd LOVE to be an Ambassador and am going attempt to \nraise enough money on the next election cycle. \nHis info is: \nand I hesitate to give him your info w/out ur permission... \nAm doing Aspen Institute Socrates Society program over President's weekend if you're in Aspen! Miss you! \nLove and Happiness, Gwendolyn \nPS. Have a conference call with Jessica Joffe tomorrow."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033147.txt_3455
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033147.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "5/29/2019 11:59:25 PM", "subject": null, "body": "heads up that in michael wolfes book it said alan asked trump for a million dollars up front.. it also talks\nabout me an the palm beach house purchase"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031067.txt_3456
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031067.txt
subject: Fwd: Google Alert - jeffrey epstein sex scandal
messages:
  [{"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/27/2015 2:34:05 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Google Alert - jeffrey epstein sex scandal", "body": "What a piece of shit!!!"}, {"sender": "Google Alerts <googlealerts-noreply@google.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "March 26, 2015 at 4:05:39 PM EDT", "subject": "Google Alert - jeffrey epstein sex scandal", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033000.txt_3463
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033000.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "May 16, 2017, at 1:42 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very complex. I passed your message. . in addition Im not sure what role you and your boss would like to play in the yemen issue moving forward. . I think to progress what you and terje have spoken about, the rebel leaders are ready to propose a document they woudl like a cease fire , and halt. If you like I can pass on their proposal. THIS IS NOT WHAT I DO. my expertise is only money. . but it seems like your part of the world would like advice, very complex for me."}, {"sender": "<anasalrasheed1111>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 21, 2017 at 11:07 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "just finished watching trump speech, he did well"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "5/21/2017 3:51:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes. His time at home more difficult"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032208.txt_3468
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032208.txt
subject: lawkrauss -- 2017/07/11
messages:
  [{"sender": "lawkrauss [lawkrauss]", "recipients": ["lawkrauss"], "timestamp": "7/11/2017 11:42:34 PM", "subject": "lawkrauss -- 2017/07/11", "body": "ok.. in france now.. we can talk next week.. after we deal with trump. :) Thanks for the driver!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032478.txt_3470
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032478.txt
subject: Re: A few favors...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "can you send me an email to forward to tom. hes in the middle o some of the mess at the moment. everyone lawyering up in wash.."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "When in NYC?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:52 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "kathy agreed"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:53 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "Thanks. Any time to get together today?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:59 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "12?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 1:59:28 PM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "Great."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028854.txt_3486
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028854.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional, emotional. and financial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "\"girls?\"„ careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any..... also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im on for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/19/2014 11:54:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me....just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033014.txt_3493
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033014.txt
subject: Re: Questions for article
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Masha Drokova"], "timestamp": "8/24/2017 5:58:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Questions for article", "body": "you should contact robert trivers\nRobert Trivers"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 1:22 AM", "subject": "Re: Questions for article", "body": "Jeffrey,\nHuffington Post is almost done with their article. They need couple answers to use them for your quotes.\nPlease see below.\nQuestions for you:\n1. As a result of Trump's budget cuts, more scientists are turning to private donors for funds. How have you\nhelped these scientists thrive during this time in particular?\n2. Why do you think it's important to have funded the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics and how will this\nprogram help us in the future?\nQuestions for a scientist (can I ask Martin to answer and quote him)?\n1. How has Jeffery Epstein's donations helped you advance your research?\nLet me know if you have any questions or comments. Would appreciate speedy response.\nThank you!\nMasha"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032444.txt_3517
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032444.txt
subject: Re: Kuhn
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert L. Kuhn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Jan 11, 2017, at 2:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Dear Jeffrey: \n\nAttached, as promised, is our proposal for Closer To Truth to produce the definitive television series on \"The \nScience of Sleep and Dreams\" - 13 episodes, a full season, on —200 PBS stations, plus extensive web videos. \nContemporary advances in sleep/dream research makes timing propitious. \n\nThree documents: \n1) Proposal (12 pages) \n2) Budget (line item) \n3) Schedule (weekly) \n\nPlease confirm receipt. \n\nI'll be in New York from January 19 until about February 8. Love to meet - on Sleep/Dreams and all sorts of \nfun stuff to cheer our 2017.\n\nRobert"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Just got to New York - love to meet, brainstorm. \n\nFrom Washington, my inauguration-day commentary and conversation with Chinese experts on Sino-US \nrelations under Trump - https://youtu.be/OGdulpmeVNM?list=PLt-M8o1W GdSZbSuplmsSS5JZzlhIWpGb  \n\nEarlier interview on BBC \"What Chinese think of Trump\" - two minute excerpt \n- http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04m9jj4  \n\nLooking forward, Robert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Jan 22, 2017, at 4:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "look forward to it"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/22/2017 9:49:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "I'm flexible after Tuesday. (Doing CNBC on Trump-China Tues morning) \n\nI forgot to congratulate you on winning your l000000ng-odds bet on Trump with Woody. Everyone I know, \nincluding me, would have bet against you. Quite extraordinary."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032220.txt_3522
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032220.txt
subject: Please
messages:
  [{"sender": "Linda Stone [s", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/12/2015 5:22:10 AM", "subject": "Please", "body": "Please tell me Trump will not win the election...\n\nXo\n\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026937.txt_3524
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026937.txt
subject: Tax expert tells Congress there is 'a lot to find' in Trump's returns
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn (i", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/8/2019 1:23:55 PM", "subject": "Tax expert tells Congress there is 'a lot to find' in Trump's returns", "body": "https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/tax-expert-tel1s-congress-there-lot-find-trump-s-tax-n969121"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031729.txt_3525
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031729.txt
subject: Fwd: epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman Po", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren indyke iis"], "timestamp": "3/13/2017 8:16:55 PM", "subject": "Fwd: epstein", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "DAN CHRISTENSEN", "recipients": ["Tonja Haddad Coleman [is"], "timestamp": "March 13, 2017 at 5:15:15 PM EDT", "subject": "epstein", "body": "Hi, Tonya,\n\nI left you a couple of voicemails. Working on a story about Epstein/Trump.\nCan you please get in touch asap. Story is to run tomorrow and I’d like to get your thoughts.\n\nMy cell (as"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 16, 2014 at 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: <no subject>", "body": "8PM tonight out of Miami= at the office for 20 more minutes trying to finish up!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025877.txt_3526
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025877.txt
subject: Re: Last nite was absolutely great -thank you
messages:
  [{"sender": "Stephen Hanson ii", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 6:20 AM", "subject": "Re: Last nite was absolutely great -thank you", "body": "When are u free today"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 23, 2015, at 6:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Last nite was absolutely great -thank you", "body": "what stood out the most for you?"}, {"sender": "Shanson900", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 11:00:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Last nite was absolutely great -thank you", "body": "Putin\n\nFeelings towards Obama and his actions with Syria\nSyria\n\nAll beyond interesting"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033386.txt_3528
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033386.txt
subject: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 25, 2011 12:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/27/2011 4:17:37 PM", "subject": "Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "Jeffrey-\n\nI need to start off by stating that it is not my intent to go around Shawn Lancaster on this — Shawn is a friend.\nThis being said, I have received e-mails from both you and Larry this weekend.\n\nI called Larry and he said I should send you an e-mail.\n\nI called a close friend of mine inquiring about the GV market and aircraft that are \"not published\". As of today,\nthere are eight (8) of these aircraft that are not yet on the market.\n\nLet me know if you would like to speak with him and by what means (you call him, he call you, call\nLarry?....whatever).\n\nBy the way, his company sold Trumps 727 and got Trump a very attractive number for an aircraft that was on\nit's way to a museum.\n\nHope all is well.\nSincerely,\n\nEric Roth\nPresident\n\ninternational jet"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032336.txt_3536
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032336.txt
subject: Re: speak. JE
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5 Nov 2016, at 8:52", "subject": "Re: speak. JE", "body": "speak?"}, {"sender": "ehbarak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 4:35 PM", "subject": "Re: speak. JE", "body": "Sure. Speak. When? #?\nBest\nEB"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5 Nov 2016, at 10:28", "subject": "Re: speak. JE", "body": "paris"}, {"sender": "ehbarak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/7/2016 3:54:57 AM", "subject": "Re: speak. JE", "body": "Hi Jeff\nThe Trump momentum,\nI believe was stopped.\nHillary might be on her way to Win. But with much lower margin, and probably still GOP controlled Senate.\nBest\nEB"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030799.txt_3539
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030799.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, December 26, 2018 8:32 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "where are yoyu"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 8:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Kent, connecticut....and you? Hear about Bannon in italy?should I take the huawei cfo?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, December 26, 2018 8:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "561 655 7626.."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 8:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will call in a while...have a lot of good gossip"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "12/26/2018 2:33:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump screamimg at people as they are vacation while he sits it the WH funny"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029223.txt_3543
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029223.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "1/4/2015 10:25:34 AM", "subject": null, "body": "bad press in full' swing . she also claims to have dinner on my island with clinton. lots of details where he \nwas sitting etc however he was NEVER on the island NEVER. its silly, but she has lots of traction"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026110.txt_3544
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026110.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow I wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Call me now if u can"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 29, 2017 8:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You can come earlier if you like?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Mon, May 29, 2017 at 8:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 7:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "can you call my cell"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "At wake now. Is AM ok - what is #"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Nick, Donald has recently said that I betrayed him 15 years ago , he said there was a lawsuit that he asked me to get involved and help and I refused. Do you have any insight ??"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/3/2017 12:14:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What's ur # I will call u"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025122.txt_3548
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025122.txt
subject: Re: Is Donald still feeling good
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "R u still plugged in to the show?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 7:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "wild, there will be some changes this week.. funny but kaslowitz is getting turned down repeatedly , by firms unwilling to represent donald."}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "Of crudity surely\n\nOf gross ignorance surely\n\nOf being utterly without the intellect temperament for job surely\n\nOf being over line on family profiting very likely\n\nOf gross disregard for appearances almost surely.\n\nOf Russians having financial leverage. Less clear\n\nOf Russians helping in. Election w complicity of his campaign plausible but not certain\n\nStrikes me if u work for Donald u don't free lance so he is guilty of whatever his campaign did.\nDo u agree w foregoing?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023270.txt_3549
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023270.txt
subject: trying to bridge the gap.
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "trying to bridge the gap.", "body": "team. with Eileen at the head. instructions were given by me, , detailed but ignored by her. ( except in\nthe instances where I inserted myself and personally had to do the weeks of grunt work\n),ex. jpm morgan acct still not in use? That being said, If you do the cold calculation ,starting from\nwhere you were, to where you are currently . you have made a hell ofa deal. -- negotiating down\nmy original amount requested , calling upon our friendship and suggesting that the Carlyn mess was\npartially my fault. (though in that specific example , I had never been asked to do more than merely\nprovide you the name of the most highly recognized atty in the field, not consulted,nor even asked\nagain for my guidance along the way. ).I accepted the discount as your friend. ( by the way\nsuggesting now, that your Tom is now that last word on tax characterization, frankly is a bit much,-).\nhowever - that is all in the past.\nIn order to move forward\n\nI would ask that you realize that very unlike yours, My business is only comprised of my personal\nattention and my personal time . Time that I was forced to grossly overspend on your various issues\nlast year. . As you are my very close friend I will not have you participate in a bidding process that I\nhave decided 1 will have this year for my time . (hopefully a more fair way to allocate ) I would also\nask that you keep in mind that though our deal expired months ago. (also keeping in mind , that your\nunderstanding of the final payment terms neither reflected the emails or my memory, we finished it up\nyour way. ) I have answered every call Brad , joslin, Ada or you, have made . reviewed docs over and\nover/ until once again, I was forced to insert myself strongly as I thought it dangerous not to. I made\nserious dollar and time concessions last year.very serious I am wiling to continue to accommodate\nsome of your concerns , but I am, under no circumstances , none, willing to spend my time for free.\nits not fair. After cleaning up Carlyn's mess , which was a few weeks and 30 million dollars . We\nwere both highly aware of the dire circumstances in which you found yourself last year, and in fact due\npredominately to its seriousness. and those very circumstances I took extra care in our negotiations .\n(you had claimed I had you over a barrel , ( a horrible position to be in with my very close friend.,),\nunfortunately I fear that if you are not cautious ,in the near future, another barrel will appear of your\nown design )\n\nI heard you when you said you believed 1 had already been paid for the work that is now required. The\nart partnership has fully answered all your concerns and discharged all my obligations and more so.\n. (FYI Carlyns art partnership that you referenced is similar in only its title. ) You will also recall\nthat you required that my payments be at the end of my work not at the beginning as everyone else's .(\nmy work was never to include hours upon hours of training your staff). I eventually agreed, this of\ncourse should make clear that the 2014 tax year that will close Oct 2015 is not covered by our past\nagreement at all. I pointed this very fact out to you when I initially proposed a multi year agreement\nright out of the box. you said you preferred not. As you said ,I have produced results to date, far in\nexcess of even my own exalted opinion of my projections. I have devoted a monumental amount of my\nlimited amount of time-- way, way in excess of our agreement. I will be fair, I am willing to roll in\nthe amount still outstanding from last year if that helps .. However, As my best student , and my only\none, you are now capable of doing most, if not all, of the required work yourself. I can put my\nwhiteboard away when you come to eat and just have fun, trade stories,. share moments ideas etc.. I\nam of course always available to guide you as a friend if you choose that route . always . It will take a\ngreat deal of your time , but you will not have to spend any more money on mine .\n\nWe are scheduled to meet fri at 430 , I leave at 5 am sat morning."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029545.txt_3562
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029545.txt
subject: Re: boosting strategy
messages:
  [{"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "February 7, 2014 at 10:33:16 AM EST", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "We are pushing up the highest authority domains available for \"Jeffrey Epstein\" in general. I had reserved the approach of pushing non-website URLs for a few months because you expressed concern with making sure our URLs are on first page... but I had call w/ Mr. Epstein in the beginning of January and expressed that is a limiting factor for moving Forbes/NYPost as quickly as we'd like.\n\nGetting up different types of results for different folks is required to dislodge the negative placements. Once they are dislodged it is much easier to restore our websites back to the rankings and have our \"ideal\" first page. The reason for this is Google tracks click data on results and as soon as Forbes/NYPost are on second page they will begin a slow death (less clicks on those, more clicks on the ones we have on first page)\n\nFrom there we will see our properties shoot up due to the interlinking between them and the reinforcement we can provide from sites like Harvard, Nat Geo, and any other publications we have influence over. Using the \"short-term\" links is one battle around other pages is just a part of the overall war... You saw how Google was changing up much more dramatically when we had multiple Epstein's on the first page vs. having a saturated first page.\n\nI feel like time was lost focusing on making sure it was Mr. Epstein properties when he has giving explicit permission to promote any URL required to dislodge the negatives.\n\nI hope this makes sense.. I haven't heard from Rich on the last invoice I sent (1/29/14) and am hoping all is well. Do you know if he's out of the office ?"}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "February 7, 2014 at 10:47 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Hi Tyler,\n\nOk thanks so much for the review. I've cc'd Jeffrey. I'll be in touch this afternoon.\n\nChristina Galbraith"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith", "Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Thank you Christina - I tried your cell a few minutes ago and will be available on mine at your convenience. It is imperative we get a placement out by mid next week in order for us to hit the timeline I spoke to Mr. Epstein about.. The fresh piece needs to come out while we are dislodging the current results (as you are observing now).\n\nMr. Epstein if you have any questions on current status vs. our conversation around Jan 10. please advise - We are continuing to work aggressively to clean up results per our last call. I am also available to discuss this at your convenience today or over weekend.\n\nSincerely,\nTyler Shears"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 7, 2014, at 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "About 4,880,000 results (0.33 seconds) different computer, not good"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "2/8/2014 1:32:58 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Richard Kahn\nUnderstand the two negatives are still present. We are still on track per our last call of 60 days from 1/10 if we can get the placement out next week Christina is preparing for us and results continue to respond as they have been.\n\nIt takes 30 days for Google to respond in most cases and we ramped up 28 days ago with boosting alternate URLs per our call\n\nWe are working very hard to make this happen and should have Christina set up to support us with columns on a few top sites at no cost moving forward\n\nI am available for a call now or this weekend to review."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030095.txt_3564
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030095.txt
subject: Re: Trump Soho
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["es"], "timestamp": "12/17/2009 5:54:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump Soho", "body": "I spoke to henri and bob,, henri tried hard to bullshit me, telling me he had talked to the studios and felt comfortable he could raise over 100 million in guaranteed distribution, I checked , and of course , it turned out to be smoke. I like bob, and would have hope your friend would have more respect for. him. I will look in to trump."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump Soho", "body": "Just heard from an insider that they will probably go into foreclosure ...the deal is done and dead....building is complete ready to open in Feb\n\nOnly 30%/ 35% sold...hardly any can actually close.\n\nNot sure if this is interesting....can have you talk to the developer (Sapir)\n\nHope all is well..."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026662.txt_3569
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026662.txt
subject: Kuhn
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/13/2017 11:08:13 PM", "subject": "Kuhn", "body": "Great talking. Covered lots. All fun! \nAttached is the Shanghai Science of Consciousness program (Stuart Hameroff put together; I advised). \nGregory Chaitin on Closer To Truth - https://www.closertotruth.com/contributor/gregory-chaitin/profile (scroll \ndown for videos). \nMy Bloomberg TV on Trump/China (Feb. 1, pre Trump-Xi call) \n- http s ://www. dropb ox com/s/o 0 6wvej Ilms i9 1 7/Dr%20Kuhn%20B lo omb erg%20D aybreak%20 - \n%20As ia .mov? d1=0 - \nAppreciate discussing \"Science of Sleep & Dreams\" - I'll pull together significance of recent \nresearch/discoveries yielding inflection point, such that timing is propitious for the definitive TV series \nbenchmarking the field and making impact.\nWarmest,\nRobert"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030000.txt_3570
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030000.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "What was behind this, do you know? Or just nutters?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "al taylor, pr former jerry springer producer"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 9:45:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "crazy"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025888.txt_3581
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025888.txt
subject: Fwd: FDA Approved a Potent and Pricey Cholesterol lowering drug today
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayern", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/24/2015 8:37:24 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FDA Approved a Potent and Pricey Cholesterol lowering drug today", "body": "Have you heard of this colestrol"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023264.txt_3585
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023264.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Leon", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella (-)"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 6:13 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Congragulations on biting the bullet. at least 18 months late , but I m encouraged and glad for you. When you interviewed Brad two years ago you asked that i not tell him what a disaster lay before him. what would you like me to tell Barry? '\n\nThere is a HUGE amount of work to be done in the next 9 -12 months. mostly the exact same work that i outlined in my email of 2 years ago. now complicated by years of mess on top. ( you can send it again if you like ). Brad wechsler was never up to the task . sorry, I realize I have been saying the very same thing for a long time. he was a not a step up from Eileen but a step sideways. in the beginning there was Eileen and Tom and Ralph Lerner. all your hand picks. then brad. john, Joe. . joslin was chosen from a pool of 2 people. each that would be limited by a salary of 250k. ( yes 1 personally augmented his comp in order to get him ) I did say hire both Lisa to do the bookkeeping and joslin tax,\n\nHe complained for over a year , re his direction by eileen and ada , and then brad. His breakdown was not a surprise after months and moths of warnings. Though disabled, he ran your office this year. with john and joe. He ran amok, and as i told you he rarely failed to remind me in our conversations that you told him that he works for you and not for me and that brad needs to pays him .\n\n. Asking me who to hire , estate attny tax people etc. :\n\nI have taken heat for years over the fact that i gave you no more than carlyns name, . no follow up questions no interactions , not even one single question asked of me re her work. ( that was Eileen _) but somehow carlyns fuck up was my doing. . —_ when i told you that 1 thought Eileen wasn't up to the task, you bellowed that i was talking out of both sides of my mouth. . You told me this year , that by trying to protect you from crazy joslin, I had in essence fired him and it was my responsibility to do his work. it then turns out that he didn't consider himself fired at all he just received less money. and continued to make a really dangerous mess.. Joshn castrucci, in your eyes , was also my doing , though email after email said , I take no responsibility for him,and 1YOU SHOULD NOT HIRE HIM |!!! , your response was that was my opinion was only because i didn't trust him. then to add insult to injury last jan you told me he was gone. however he too is still there, and a waste of money and space.\n\nMy time is complicated by Donald's potentially eviscerating any reason for anyone to use the foreign funds repatriation plan that 1 had put together. . however as you are aware I have some decisions to make re my time allocation in the next year or two. so at least for a few weeks I am unable to commit much time and make any future plans to guide you in the redoing of your procrastination produced mess.\n\nThat being said, the tasks at hand are the following. You have a bomb of colored string that your retarded children have formed , It has to be very carefully unwound , even the substitution of Barry for your next trustee, needs a careful focus on procedure.s It would be much preferable if Wechsler was not his replacement. do you have any person you trust ??! . I"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031818.txt_3587
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031818.txt
subject: RE: AVGO
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 7:11 AM", "subject": "RE: AVGO", "body": "Im not angry, sorry, it is sad. it is apparent that you have no experience trading. we both made a mistake. . the spy trades were the results of a rank amatuer.. you took a postion on the direction of the market. ok. you decided to play it extra short time and short. . why? becaue the options are cheaper. ? knowing full well that time premium was running. . first silly move. . I allowed as promised to give you authority. . you set a target. . it hit the traget, you moved in back. based on media reporting on trump visit? you didnt act. the market dipped and you panicked. . AMATEUR. wrong options wrong timing, no discipline and as a percentaage of investment, a one day dip fof 25%. wanting to buy the highter strike, is ok. but why the same month? why the same moment. why the same index. . sorry. I have taught this for many years. and your grade is an F. not one good move in many. . re broadcom. the crack happend in the morning, options were higher. no alternative presented. no analysis. , this is no way to manage money. I have lost a great deal of money hoping you would be able to do as you promised you could . would.. Had you told me, jeffrey I d like to try a new job as a manager lets start slow I can learn . i would be less annoyed. you told me you had great confidence knew the risks and truly believed you would be able to raise money .do well and prosper. . If it were not you, this would have ended months ago.. we should work on a solution . not sure yet what shape it takes."}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 9:42 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Jeffrey I understand your frustrations and appreciate your willingness to figure out a solution. I have some ideas which I will send you over the weekend if that is OK. Re Broadcom: the stock is up $1.20 at $211.50. After the initial shock reaction of yesterday, there has been a lot of focus on the cost synergies etc. but very little conviction in revenue opportunities. However until we hear from management as to the overall intentions of the deal, uncertainty will linger. This morning the pricing is as follows: Aug 200 Puts cost $4.10 Sept 200 Puts cost $7.90 Earning are on 08/30. So worst case is the uncertainty lingers until then which would argue to buy the Sept puts. However I still prefer buying the Aug puts as I would fully expect more clarity from management before August expiry."}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "Any thoughts on the AVGO Aug puts? Stock trading at 204.50. Aug puts now $6.50"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 1:55 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "lye had enough!!!! Which puts ????"}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 2:13 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "My initial recommendation this morning was to buy the $200 Aug puts. I still think that is the best idea. The stock is now down 16% on a deal that no one fully understands. The CEO has a good track record regarding mergers. So I think it makes sense to keep the stock and own protection for the next 35 days until we hopefully get more clarity from management."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 2:18 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "Again?? How many puts ? What are the alternatives. The fact tgat you iwn thd stock at a higher price is affecting your decision. Sorry. This is judt ridiculous!!! Would you buy the stock here .7777 If you would would you also buy puts ??? My patience is at its end"}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "7/13/2018 6:57:15 PM", "subject": "RE: AVGO", "body": "We own 8000 shares on the thesis that their growing exposure to data center capex spend would be a big positive for the stock. Recommendation: Keep the stock and buy Aug $200 puts on the 8000 shares costing $6.50 or $52,000. Nothing has changed regarding their core business. Data center spending is not going to change based off this M&A transaction. However if I am wrong and the market further penalizes the stock at least our losses are contained. The stock has dropped $40 and I think we could easily recoup our premium if the market buys into the CEO's reason for the merger. If I never had a position I would absolutely buy the stock using options. I would be selling October $185 puts and buying Oct $220 calls costing 50c/share."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030766.txt_3591
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030766.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-04-05/bannon-removed-from-national-security-council-role-in-shakeup"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 6:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "War between the Jews and the non Jews. Jews presently winning."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "4/5/2017 4:56:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yup , tillerdon unhsppy with Jared in Iraq. Pence given health bill . Kelly conway in trouble. All fun barrack gone dark"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029237.txt_3592
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029237.txt
subject: another idea for obama. not as good as bio signal intelligence.
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "10/25/2015 11:46:21 AM", "subject": "another idea for obama. not as good as bio signal intelligence.", "body": "another idea for obama. not as good as bio signal intelligence. . the cinese are willing to build a new \ncollider. they will put up the money and build it , but need american tech. if he were to call it the obama xi \ncollider. his legazy would be great in scinece and the project takes 15 -30 years."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032729.txt_3595
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032729.txt
subject: Joe cinque
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayern", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/4/2018 10:29:59 AM", "subject": "Joe cinque", "body": "Do you know him I heard he is so close to trump\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031830.txt_3603
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031830.txt
subject: Re: You should see this movie/documentary
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2/6/2011 1:27:43 PM", "subject": "Re: You should see this movie/documentary", "body": "it is very unfair, and misrepresents tons of inf"}, {"sender": "<111110", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:26 AM", "subject": "Re: You should see this movie/documentary", "body": "Inside Job (2010)\nNYT Critics' Pick This movie has been designated a Critic's Pick by the film reviewers of The New York Times.\nHenry Paulson, Ben Bernanke and Timothy Geithner in the documentary \"Inside Job.\"\nSony Pictures Classics\nWho Maimed the Economy, and How\nBy A. 0. SCOTT\n\"Inside Job,\" a sleek, briskly paced film whose title suggests a heist movie, is the story of a crime without\npunishment, of an outrage that has so far largely escaped legal sanction and societal stigma. The betrayal\nof public trust and collective values that Mr. Ferguson chronicles was far more brazen and damaging than\nthe adultery in Nathaniel Hawthorne's novel, which treated Hester more as scapegoat than villain."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023054.txt_3604
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023054.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/1/2019 10:18:27 AM", "subject": null, "body": "prostittion is a state crime, never before a man in his own house charged with soliciting. ! in Florida first offenders are required to take a sex ed class and get pre trial diversion, no criminal record. . . there is a felony solication for the THIRD offense. . A grand jury was held and they found me guilty of one count of felony solitciation. because there were many girls. . mandatory diversion. sentence. !!!! a grand jury . ususally only for capital murder cases. . Recarey and Reiter ( police chief). pulled my garbage for months, and surveilled the house . letting all the gilrs come and go ? ! called in the FBI. they did not like the grand jury result. and released to the press, the raw sewage of police interviews , ie, no girl was cross examined EVER. . Unheard of . - the girls retunred the house multiplie times. for 200 dollars for a rub and tug. . no sex. . some worked in the locak massage parlors, most in thier mid twenties.. There is only press stories told my strippers of me buying my girlfiedn from slovakia from her parents . girls under 15. . all made up to get press. . FBI / puts a task force together title\" operation leap year \" to investigate my personal massage activity ?! nuts. interviews my chiropractor ? medical info. . etc. Milworked at Mara Lago. Trump knew of it. and came to my house many times during that period. The testimony of the houseman John allessi confiremed it. He never got a massage. abe gosman a friend of mine. ran into financial difficulty with assited living homes. . His home was listed at 45 million dollars. with no takers for months on end . He and I agreed a price of 30m. ( His wife lynn. ends up going to jail for lying to the bankrupty trustee about her jewelry. ) this is in the summer of 04. . I became the stalking horse bidder at 36 m. ie if someone bid higher I would receive a fee. trump buys the house at the telephone auction. only me trump andd his friend pulty the developer. He quickly puts it on the market for 125 million, serves the purpose of a justification for a high sale later . . and no one will touch it. it is is bough in the name of trump properties 11c.. no idea who owns it. or what else it\" owns \". Three years later 08 he sells it to Ryboloolev for approx 100 million. He should have had a 50 million plus capital gain. he tells people and press he spent 20-30 m to fix up. that would justifiy a reduction in captial gains, key question how did he report the sale , if he did at all on his 08 tax return. He has no money. when he buys the house. His biz model is putting his name on a real estate development and gets a fee for using his name. The hotel biz is just that. someone else buys the hotel. hoping to make a profit from its operation and eventual sale. Trump put his name on it, and get a 2 % fee and maybe a piece of the profit if any on sale. He touts the project as \" his \" . just as in his current financial statements on file as president he lists his \" income \" as the GROSS receipts of the clubs, with no expenses deducted. not his personal revenue. ie the doral golf club loses money every year. it pays out more than it takes in , but he lists the revenue as his income. AMAZING. \"Trump's relationship with Deutsche Bank has not always been amicable; in November 2008, he had difficulty making payments on a $640 million Deutsch Bank loan — $40 million of which he guaranteed personally — he took out to finance the construction of the Trump tower in Chicago.\" http s ://themo scowproj ect. org/c o llus ion/trump -sues-deutsche-b ank-3 -billion/ in july , miraculously , rybololev ve buys the house for roughly the same\" 40 plus million dollar\" profit\" https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/08/24/the-russian-diplomat-found-dead-in-his-pool-in-sudan-is-the-seventh-to-die-since-november/?utm term=.77b0a287fb11 Joe Recarey dies in june of 18. same m.o. ?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033437.txt_3605
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033437.txt
subject: Re: Call from New Yorker.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 9:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "It was latter. Why bad form. Supposed to be face to face?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 9:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "this is only the first quarter of the game. if you call a time out, its on the field and done with dignity, you\ncant retreat into the locker room and send a note to the opposing side. _in the next quarter she will appreciate\nwhatever you've said with respect and founded on strength. you care very much for this person. you might\nwant to demonstrate that. a note does the very opposite. . its like trump firing comey. :)"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019 at 9:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Hmmm.\nI think sometimes written communication shows seriousness of thought but see your point"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 9:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "coming from you -- not mutually exclusive"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 3:48:09 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": ""}]


