# 0_raw_data

thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025792.txt_5805
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025792.txt
subject: Is Denmark going bankrupt?
messages:
  [{"sender": "digest-noreply@quora.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/14/2019 7:03:52 PM", "subject": "Is Denmark going bankrupt?", "body": "Answer: If you watch Fox News? Yup. . . Choked under the weight of burdensome. . . .\n\nJeffrey's Digest\nTop Stories For You\n\nIs Denmark going bankrupt?\n\nErik Callaway, lives in Denmark (2014-present)\nWritten Feb 11\n\nIf you watch Fox News? Yup. . . Choked under the weight of burdensome taxes, over-regulation, and society’s leaches, Denmark is primed to implode.\n\nIf you look at any quality...\n\nRead More »\n\nWhen my father was 32 I was 9. Now he is twice as old as me. How old am I?\n\nParth Parulekar, Software Engineering Intern at Avalara\nWritten Tue\n\nYou are 23 years old.\n\nTo answer this question, you must form the equation below:\n\n2(9+x) = 32+x\n\nwhere x is the number of years passed since the father was 32.\n\n... Read More »\n\nWhy do you think the reason behind Trump abruptly canceling Pence’s New Hampshire trip?\n\nJill Grant, voting for over fifty years\nWritten Jul 6\n\nHe wanted Pence in the background for the pictures on July Fourth.\n\nThere isn’t any other reason unless he’s going in for surgery, the New Hampshire police found out at the l...\n\nRead More »\n\nDo French understand us if we speak French as it's written?\n\nEric Dec, knows French\nWritten May 25\n\nNo, we don't. Because French has too many diphtongs and silent letters.\n\nTry to pronounce oiseau (bird) as it's written. It might sound like oy-see-ay-oo. But no French speak...\n\nRead More »\n\nMy 10-year-old biological son keeps telling my adopted 12 year old that she’s “not really family.” I’ve tried to explain how that upsets her but he doesn’t stop. How can make him understand?\n\nFelicia Marie Hippler, mother of 3 one with Down Syndrome\nWritten Jul 5\n\nI was adopted.. I went through this too not just from my sister's but from cousins that were very close in age but my mom always told me something that really stuck with me...\n\nRead More »\n\nWhy is Trump’s trade war the wrong way to compete with China?\n\nIsaac Yeung, Christian Economist (2008-present)\nWritten Wed\n\nDonald Trump has a nickname in China, known as Chuan Jian Kuo (川建國). Chuan means Trump. Jian means building. Kuo means the country. While Trump pledges to make America grea...\n\nRead More »\n\nWhat are signs of a high IQ in an individual, both positive and negative?\n\nMichael Wellen\nWritten May 11\n\n1.\tTendency to jump around in conversation.\n2.\tA certain distance. Like they’re not entirely there with you.\n3.\tThey collect interesting ‘friends’.\n4.\tKindness....\n\nRead More »\n\nI heard Israeli satellites orbit Earth in the opposite direction due to various launch restrictions. Does the IDF get any advantages from this?\n\nMaayan Stern, lives in Israel (2009-present)\nWritten May 14\n\nThe reason we launch satellites to the west isn’t an advantage- in fact, it’s a disadvantage because we can’t take advantage of the Earth’s rotation. We do it because our e...\n\nRead More »\n\nWhy do most of people love Canada but not so many houses and buildings hang the national flag not like the US?\n\nRoss Driedger, VP of Technology (2017-present)\nWritten Jul 2\n\nDriving through the USA, I see an American flag waving in the wind above some random house, then another, and another, and yet another, and so on.\n\nYes, I know I am in your c...\n\nRead More »\n\nIs Tinder right for me?\n\nTomas Rauhala, Musician, Bartender, Sound Engineer\nWritten Jul 4\n\nThat depends…\n\n1.\tAre you a woman? (If you are, go ahead. Women can always score.)\n2.\tIf you’re a man, are you at least 6 feet tall?\n3.\tIf not… Are you unusually good-looking (like a mo...\n\nRead More »"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022943.txt_5809
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022943.txt
subject: boies
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "11/7/2017 10:35:08 AM", "subject": "boies", "body": "http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/ \nright on time, i didnt know. boies is his co counsel. . represents that claims that al gore, \nand clinton were both on the island. he knows its not true, or could clearly ask hif former clients."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030757.txt_5812
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030757.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016, at 12:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "bring me up to speed."}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016 at 9:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Moving (small places in Raleigh and Bellevue), wrapping up taxes, wrapping up fire claim, trying to figure out if technologies that soothe the nervous system (that offer the positive effects that meditation or massage might offer) are worth working on....\n\nAnd wondering if the fact that so many people are on anti-depressant, adhd, and other drugs, is what makes trump appealing and his flaws invisible...\n\nWill you have a cabinet position?\nHow are you?\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016, at 12:15 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think he can win?"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016 at 7:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "SPEAK! Please. What do you think?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016, at 2:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "too far to tell, we will know much more come oct 15"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016 at 1:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "How's that?\n\nWhich team you pulling for?\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["—"], "timestamp": "9/26/2016 11:34:40 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "none"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032730.txt_5819
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032730.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/4/2018 2:26:09 PM", "subject": null, "body": "went to the trump mar a lago speech trump gave Saturday he isn't kidding about a trade war he said we \nhave nothing to loose because we are already loosing he used the example of Indian motorbikes coming into \nthe us and India charges 125 percent for Harley's quite frankly I wouldn't ride an Indian motorbike if \nyou paid me and 99 .9 percent of Indians can't afford a Harley belt buckle .last night went to James \ncohens house a palace he is s nice guy we had a long talk he sold Hudson news and now into multi family \nhousing we should get together for lunch I am going to get to know him better best stay well jonathan"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030743.txt_5831
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030743.txt
subject: Re: privieged
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "lots of reporters inquiries. !. doithink that trump set me up? what do i know about his dealings? . did i speak to you? suggestion. all public record, house bought out of a bankruptcy proceding . I was the stalking horse bid.. never before was there a prosecution of erotic massage by women for money in someones home. every girl got money. returned . most interviewed by police over 21. all public record. some concern on my team that i will get a cong subpoena. doi have to wear a tie?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:13 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "Again! Why you need a team in place! Where are you with Ollie?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:17 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "hes great. he needs to get the documents from the law firms that are wholly focused on this submission to the judge. . BTW He asked for Imilllion per month . for a year. ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 11:24:24 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "Expensive. But... In a way this new round of calls is an opportunity: reporters suddenly thinking they don’t know something or that there is a new angle—now would be a good moment to hit them with a better prepared set of responses. Somebody, Ollie or otherwise, should get started on this."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012102.txt_5843
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012102.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "5/7/2019 4:29:00 AM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/06/us/politics/trump-inauguration-stephanie-winston-wolkoff.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031313.txt_5844
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031313.txt
subject:
  Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "8/18/2016 2:47:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Importance: — High"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "Michael, Charles", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "August 17, 2016 at 10:56:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021399.txt_5845
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021399.txt
subject: Fwd: From Alexandra Wolfe
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg Esq ED", "Darren Indyke (Sah"], "timestamp": "3/3/2011 5:54:10 PM", "subject": "Fwd: From Alexandra Wolfe", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Peggy Sicgal", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "March 2, 2011 3:19:39 PM PST", "subject": "From Alexandra Wolfe", "body": "Here are some questions. Thanks again for your help! Would love to talk to him, or travel to meet with him if that would be possible.\n\n-What is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation? Could he talk about his\ninterest in science and the 2011 grants/conference?\n\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the same clients or new ones? Is it\nstill at $15 billion?\n\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? With whom was he working/advising?\n\n-Where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago?\n\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell? Someone said she lives with him (but that doesn't sound right)?\n\n-What were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction?\n\n-What does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why?\n\n-What is his side of the story and have people been supportive?\n\n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025295.txt_5846
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025295.txt
subject: Fwd: Game On paper from Dr. Laffer
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 5:32:04 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Game On paper from Dr. Laffer", "body": "These old school supply siders supposedly have DT's ear. Your old pal Larry Kudlow/Laffer/Steve Moore. I think they basically wrote his tax plan. Steve Forbes for Treasury Secretary??:):)"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Drinkwater", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas, Jr."], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:38 AM", "subject": "Game On paper from Dr. Laffer", "body": "Dear Landon,\nPlease see the attached paper from Dr. Laffer.\n\nBest,\nNick"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030444.txt_5847
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030444.txt
subject: Fw: Fwd: APNewsBreak: Mueller team questions Trump friend Tom Barrack
messages:
  [{"sender": "Comms Alert <CommsAlert@gop.com>", "recipients": ["undisclosed-recipients:;"], "timestamp": "May 5, 2018 at 1:19:54 PM EDT", "subject": "APNewsBreak: Mueller team questions Trump friend Tom Barrack", "body": "APNewsBreak: Mueller team questions Trump friend Tom Barrack\nAssociated Press\n\nTom LoBianco\n\nMay 5, 2018\n\nhttos://aonews.com/6dd33b4234634079821e5825f1 12e85b?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=T\nwitter\n\nWASHINGTON (AP) — The Associated Press has learned that investigators working with special counsel Robert Mueller\nhave interviewed Tom Barrack, a close friend and confidant of President Donald Trump.\n\nThree people familiar with the probe tell the AP that Barrack met with federal investigators working on the Russia inquiry.\nThe people spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations.\n\nBarrack’s spokeswoman, Lisa Baker, declined to comment.\n\nBarrack has known Trump for decades. He’s been one of Trump’s closest advisers through the 2016 campaign and into the\nadministration. Barrack also is a leading fundraiser for the president and oversaw the fundraising for the inauguration.\n\nBarrack has a longstanding relationship with Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, and Manafort’s onetime\ndeputy, Rick Gates.\n\nGates agreed to begin cooperating with Mueller’s investigators in February."}, {"sender": "Jason Miller", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 5 May 2018 13:43:02 -0400", "subject": "Fwd: APNewsBreak: Mueller team questions Trump friend Tom Barrack", "body": "Gates."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/6/2018 1:54:36 AM", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: APNewsBreak: Mueller team questions Trump friend Tom Barrack", "body": "Gates served this brother up"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033374.txt_5849
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033374.txt
subject: Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jide Zeitlin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:55 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Thank you for the introduction. Do you have a better sense of what he needs? Also, what's his WhatsApp/mobile so I can confirm details for today? \nWhen's best on Friday for me to visit with you? \nBibi's speech was a bit of a dead letter on Europe."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 2, 2018, at 11:05", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "he is chairman of dubai world ports. african ports a new focus he built the palm islands. is totally trustworthy"}, {"sender": "Jide Zeitlin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/3/2018 6:30:55 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Unfortunately, bin Sulayem and I did not meet. I was stuck at the White House and he had a narrow window before heading to Cyprus. I just sent him the following note: \n\"Good Morning, I hope your travels to Cyprus were smooth. \nOkey Enelamah, Nigeria's trade minister, stopped by my home this evening as he was still in town after Buhari's visit with Trump. He mentioned his discussions with you at WEF and afterwards. Separately, I spoke earlier with the Vice President. \nWhenever we meet, I have some thoughts that may be helpful to you.\""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033412.txt_5856
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033412.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ugly.. very ugly"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "Oct 12, 2018, at 8:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "smells like something bigger to me. I wouldnt be surprised if MBZ set him up."}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "mmmmmm"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "Oct 12, 2018, at 10:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thought s?"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/12/2018 7:46:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Dificult to tell as of today.. leaks are done in a very smart way and.. fast.. very fast. No question Qatar scoring big. It is a media war now. I think saudis are loosing Trump if they dont start defending. Best defense is the truth even if ugly, in my opinion. Turkey is having fun, the saudis need to act. This will not go away. And, yes, Canada wins"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031475.txt_5860
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031475.txt
subject: RE: Audio recording
messages:
  [{"sender": "Will Bohlen", "recipients": ["Keough, Michael", "King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman", "David Marin", "Drake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:19 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "Thank you, Michael.\n\nReuters story just posted:\nhttp://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-security-gulen-idUSKCN10G1P8?il=0\n\nWorld | Fri Aug 5, 2016 1:07pm EDT\nRelated: WORLD"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028579.txt_5872
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028579.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Turns out you were right about sdny but they are \"going to wait their turn\"..."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Civil or crime"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Crim"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Still have to figure out what my role is in all this shit..."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you seemed to imply that your new guy could only shoot blanks? ifthats so. its an easy decision. ,\nif not. oy"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033360.txt_5875
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033360.txt
subject: Michael Wolff Launch Party
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/28/2019 8:51:55 PM", "subject": "Michael Wolff Launch Party", "body": "Assistant Editor\nHenry Holt\n175 5th Ave.\nNew York, NY loom\nStephen Rubin\ninvites you to celebrate\nMICHAEL WOLFF\nupon the publication of\nSIEGE\nTrump Under Fire\nRSVP:\nJune 3, 6-8PM\n15 West 67th Street\n**Due to space, we cannot allow plus ones.\n**This may be a duplicate invitation because we were worried the\noriginal invitation went to your spam folder!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029180.txt_5879
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029180.txt
subject: Fwd: October 19, Heidelberg
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "8/29/2018 6:06:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. so, here is the event I am still invited to give in Germany. It is Oct 19th. I was previously invited to give a \nmajor lecture in Heidelberg Oct 14 but they had to cancel it after the university determination re australia was \npublicized by the bitch. That air ticket, which they had paid fo, was about 5250 euros. There is a $900 \ncancellation fee, and they have agreed to let me keep the ticket if I pay them 4500 euros. I offered that to the \nother place but they only have $5K USD total, which includes the $4K fee they originally offered me. I am \ngoing to check other tickets now, but wanted to know if you might be flying to europe around then and could \ntake a hitchhiker. :)"}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "August 29, 2018 at 4:49:53 AM PDT", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence, \njust back from a long tour ,,on origins\". \nAs promised you will get my message promptly. \nAs you may understand, before we start recruiting for the Festival our budget \nimplies more freedom. Now I simply do not have the flexibility to decide so easily \non amounts in „kilos\". (especially as a prominent Nobel laureate shortly before \ndeadline agreed to come and implied a pretty large sum). \nWhat I can offer you is 5k as a lump sum. This is the ultimate at the moment. \nI deeply regret these limitations but I cannot ignore redlines. \nSo please let me know if you can or cannot come."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 26.08.2018 um 22:04", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. update.. noam cannot do anything anyway.. nor UK that week.. So, I have been able confirm I can get the \nticket for the discounted amount of 4500 Euros.. Are you game with my proposal? I have until end of Sept to \nbuy out the old ticket before they cancel it."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2018, at 9:34 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Well it depends on UK.. if they can't do it, then alas, it would be the whole thing.. I could check for a discount \nticket of course.. and maybe even economy class... There is also a small chance that I might do the event in UK \nwith Noam Chomsky, and I am wondering whether, if I could convince him to join me in a dialogue at your \nplace whether that might change the dynamics of the event for you, and free up some more money perhaps.."}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2018, at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence \nyour mail meets me on the way out to a week abroad. \nI need my financial colleague to decide. So, I shall be \nback at the end of this month. \nWhat would our share be?"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 17.08.2018 um 16:37", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Jakob \nThere has been a complication. The Gottingen event had to be cancelled so that means I now do not have an air ticket to Germany. I \nam going to check whether I can arrange anything in the Uk which might cover part of the cost for a new ticket. In the meantime I \nthought I should let you know and ask whether it is possible to cover part or all of the cost for a ticket."}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jun 19, 2018, at 5:52 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Dear Lawrence \nmy colleague is waiting for two sentences on your planned topic... \nCould you save him?..."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 07.06.2018 um 17:40", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Will do."}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jun 7, 2018, at 1:04 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence, \nI think we take Journey to the Beginning of Time. \nCould you write two sentences for my colleague to \nmake clear where your talk will go for.. \nThis may well lay the groundwork for next year's major focus \non ORIGINES. \nI do look forward to having you here again! \nP.S cc Michael!"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 06.06.2018 um 19:13", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. I hadn't thought of it. I don't know what Jakob would prefer. I could give a science talk.. on, say: Journey to the Beginning of \nTime.. or I could speak about \nScience in the Trump Era.. am cc'ing him here.. Jakob, which would you prefer?"}, {"sender": "Michael Braun", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jun 6, 2018, at 2:15 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Dear Lawrence Kraus, \nmy name is Michael Braun and I am working on the DAI Heidelberg's fall program brochure. \nMay I ask you if you settled on a topic for your Heidelberg talk? \nIf so, could you send me title and a short abstract for me to include in the brochure and on our website?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031307.txt_5881
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031307.txt
subject:
  Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF
  EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "8/17/2016 4:11:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF\nEPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\n\ni Oa SPT Pn TS PRESTR TL TR eT PI PTL TL ret reiterate 4"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2016, at 11:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF\nEPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033227.txt_5886
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033227.txt
subject: US idiocy
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/13/2017 1:36:48 PM", "subject": "US idiocy", "body": "re your comment on predicting Trump, there is HL Mencken's famous phrase:\n\n\"It is IMPOSSIBLE to underestimate the intelligence of the American people.\"\n\nand then from Richard Hofstadter's 1964 book on Ant-intellectualism in American Life:\n\"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has\n\nbeen a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that\ndemocracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.\"\n\nOnly thing stupefying me about Trump so far is that all his EPA appointees come from the great wasteland called\nOklahoma—lInhofe et al, climate change deniers to the last, but climate change is inescapable and by going back to\nour old way of doing things, it will merely come all the quicker\n\nall best"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030596.txt_5887
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030596.txt
subject: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 5:54:21 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "January 30, 2015, 12:00:34 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg,\nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London.\n\nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.\nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to\nwhich he has not responded.\n\nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his\nresponse by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email.\n\nYours faithfully,\n\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian\nKings Place\n90 York Way\nLondon\n\nN1 9GU"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org"], "timestamp": "29 January 2015 at 16:49", "subject": "Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein,\n\nI write further to an email sent to you earlier this month, concerning an article we are preparing for publication\nin which you may be mentioned."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025235.txt_5893
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025235.txt
subject: J.P. Morgan Eye on the Market, April 9, 2012
messages:
  [{"sender": "us.gio@jpmorgan.com", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "4/9/2012 2:11:03 PM", "subject": "J.P. Morgan Eye on the Market, April 9, 2012", "body": "Eye on the Market, April 9, 2012 (attached pdf is easier to read this week)\n\nTopics: Q&A on the USA, with a watchful eye on the risk of giant man-eating plants; Spain\n\nOur view for 2012 was that economic and equity market conditions in the US and Asia ex-Japan would be better than in Europe.  So far, that view is on track.  Spain in particular is in difficult shape (see page 5); its banks and government may have to borrow 1.5 trillion Euros over the next 12 months while in recession.  Both the ECB and EU will need to keep the spigot open to prevent Spain from becoming a bigger problem.  This week, some Q&A on the US recovery, flows into bonds and stocks, profits and P/E multiples, municipal bonds, and the long-term US fiscal situation. \n\nThe Fed appears to be saying that no additional monetary easing is needed unless the economy worsens further.  Are there any signs that the US recovery is becoming self-reinforcing?\n\nDurable goods consumption, equipment & software spending, vehicle sales, bank loans to companies, manufacturing payrolls (even after Friday’s disappointing report) and housing stats (building permits, multifamily housing starts) have improved over the last few months.  While delinquency rates are in better shape (credit card delinquencies are back to 2007 levels), household credit growth is still weak.  However, homebuilders are seeing stronger demand, and nationwide remodeling continues to rise.  We see opportunities in retailing and building products companies that may benefit from a continuation in these trends.\n\nHas the data really been that good?  I heard better US economic data has a lot to do with the weather.\n\nParts of the US experienced the warmest March in recorded history.  Measured from December to February, the winter was the 4th warmest on record.  I don’t think there are reliable models to estimate the impact of demand being pulled forward, so we will have to see how consumer spending, housing and payrolls behave in the months ahead.  As our Chief Economist Michael Vaknin reminds me, other distortions come from the “catch-up” effect from Japan’s tsunami.  As shown below, some strength in auto sales came from pent-up demand for Japanese cars, a process which now seems complete.\n\nSo where does that leave the US payroll and growth picture?\n\nThe weakness in the payroll report was almost entirely concentrated in retailing.  Net of distortions and seasonal adjustments, it looks like payroll growth is running at 150-175k per month, and GDP growth is running at a 2.25% trend pace, both below prior recoveries.  While 2.25% is a barn-burner compared to Europe, it only corresponds to a modest improvement in employment.  That’s why 2013 US fiscal policy is so important: this is not a recovery that can withstand much tighter fiscal conditions.\n\nSo, how tight is US fiscal policy supposed to get next year?\n\nVery, if you look at what is supposed to happen according to current law. In the chart, we show the annual change in the budget deficit over the last 25 years.  The impact of all provisions scheduled to expire and kick in during 2013 would be very large.  But if Congress and the President elect to extend current tax rates, retain lower payroll tax rates and extended jobless benefits, etc, the adjustment would not be as big, and only reflect expiration of Recovery Act provisions, the recently passed Budget Control Act, and some other smaller provisions.  There are of course plenty of permutations in between.\n\nWhat direction is the Congress heading, and what did Larry Summers and Brad DeLong have to say about this recently?\n\nPolitical outcomes this fall will affect what Congress does, but I get the sense that they will punt fiscal adjustments into the future if they can, and impose austerity of no more than 1% of GDP in 2013.   If so, Congress can point to a March 2012 paper by Summers and DeLong as justification.  The bottom line from the paper: don’t tighten fiscal policy when interest rates are near zero.  The authors assert that (a) additional government spending can ease the long-term budget constraint in conditions similar to today’s, and (b) tightening policy now would risk permanent loss of human capital, lower labor productivity growth and lower trend growth.  They have held these views for a while; the paper appears designed to convince others.\n\nAdvocates for more fiscal and monetary stimulus often point to the charts below.  Rising Federal debt has not resulted in higher interest rates, so why not keep borrowing more?  As for the Fed, balance sheet expansion prevented deflation and hasn’t resulted in an inflationary surge (core inflation measured over 3 months just came in below 2%), so why not keep doing it?   Aren’t these charts amazing?\n\nThey are amazing, but no one knows how long they can be sustained.  Even Summers and DeLong concede that “even if it is granted that the stimulus can be both timely and temporary, the question of how large it can be while preserving these attributes remains for future research”.    If one of these trends could not be sustained, my guess is that it would be fiscal constraints rather than monetary ones.  While it’s great to see rising Federal debt not adversely affecting Treasury markets, the chart on the left reminds me of The Day of the Triffids.\n\nWhat is The Day of the Triffids?\n\nIt’s a 1951 science fiction novel.  There’s a meteor shower, and most people go outside to look at it.  The next morning, everyone who looked at the meteor shower ends up blind, and Earth is taken over by giant man-eating venomous plants.  The point: some amazing events which look benign have unforeseen consequences.  Will a pact of going for growth pay the freight of higher Federal debt in the long run?  Hard to say; there are not a lot of examples to draw from.  Economic theories and their associated debt bubbles don’t always work out as planned [a].  After WWII, the US also faced a debt ratio of 80% of GDP.  Austerity was not the answer back then; government receipts and outlays as a % of GDP did not change much during the 1950’s, and net debt was flat.  So how did US debt/GDP fall from 80% to 46% in just ten years?  Robust annualized real growth of more than 4.0%, and 2.0% inflation.  However, unique economic conditions and productivity gains of the 1950’s (e.g., interstate highway, rebuilding of Europe and Japan) may not be repeated, and the country was not headed into an entitlement time bomb.  If the US does not experience a growth/productivity boom, the burden of higher debt could last for a generation or more. A pro-growth Administration would probably help, but the difficulty lay in defining exactly what that means. \n\nAre there debt vs austerity parallels at the state and local level?\n\nYes and no.  At the state and local level, over last decade, more than 1 trillion in unfunded pension and healthcare (OPEB) related liabilities were recognized (they were accrued over a longer period).  Even these “as-reported” estimates, which come from the states, may be underestimated.  A 2011 analysis by the Joint Economic Committee shows that lower portfolio return assumptions on pension assets sharply increase the magnitude of underfunded pensions (see chart, right).\n\nHowever, there’s more of an effort at the state/local level to address this issue than at the Federal level.  More than 40 states lowered pension benefit liabilities over the last 3 years according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Measures taken include raising employee contributions (while lowering employer payments), raising minimum retirement ages, cutting post-employment healthcare benefits and in some cases, switching to defined contribution from defined benefit plans.\n\nThe good news, to paraphrase Mark Twain, is that reports of municipal bonds’ demise have been greatly exaggerated.  From 1970 through to the end of 2011, municipal bonds rated by Moody’s experienced a grand total of 71 defaults among 17,700 issuers (11 of which occurred during 2010 and 2011).  General obligation bonds accounted for 5 defaults; 29 were related to housing; 22 for hospitals and healthcare; 3-4 each for education and infrastructure.  Utilities and cities registered 2 each, while counties, special districts, and water & sewer and experienced 1 each.  The average recovery for defaulted munis was 65%, compared to 49% on corporate senior unsecured bonds.  Last comment on municipals: while local tax collections are weak due to the collapse in home prices, state tax collections have been increasing for 7 quarters in a row.\n\nOK, so the US economy is improving, but is still heavily dependent on monetary and fiscal stimulus to grow; and the only belt-tightening one can find is at the state and local level.   Since 2009, after equities collapsed and bond prices rose, how have many investors reacted?\n\nBy selling more equities and buying a lot more bonds.  See chart above (a global version of this chart looks roughly the same).    \n\nHave investors been positioning this way since stocks are expensive?\n\nNot really.  Insert a giant martini glass on the chart below from 1998 to 2001 (I hate using simple averages which include periods when the market had lost its collective mind).  The current P/E multiple is in the middle of the ex-bubble range of the last 25 years.  Some bank stocks look interesting, even after accounting for reliance on shrinking loan loss reserves to drive income, and ongoing regulatory uncertainty.  Most US banks are at or close to Basel 3 funding needs, have considerably fewer capital adequacy questions than their European counterparts, and do not rely on wholesale funding to finance loan portfolios.\n\nNow that P/E multiples have risen off the bottom, what’s the outlook for P/E multiples and earnings from here?\n\nThe return on the S&P this year has been a function of P/E multiples rising (from 11.3x to 12.9x), a big part of which has been Apple (3% of the S&P index, 15% of S&P’s YTD returns).  As shown below, earnings revisions have been negative for 2012, but analysts are still optimistic about 2013.   According to Morgan Stanley, analysts are forecasting the highest percentage of companies posting 2013 margin expansion since 1970, and by a very wide margin.   In our view, it will be difficult for multiples to rise further unless earnings outperform expectations, particularly if Europe’s structural problems take center stage again. \n\nThe place that worries me the most: Spain.  It ranks at or close to the bottom in a lot of categories (see table), and its growth outlook is poor.  Historically, this kind of thing has not ended well.  Spain has defaulted 13 times since 1500 AD; it’s probably going to take a lot of bilateral aid and ECB financing to prevent another one.\n\nMichael Cembalest\n\nChief Investment Officer\n\n[a] Example: here’s a link to a 2007 article by Austan Goolsbee, former Chairman of the Council of Economic advisors and a member of the Obama Cabinet.  Goolsbee praises the benefits of subprime lending and related affordable housing policies, mocks Congress for holding hearings on the subject and cites Federal Reserve papers in saying that the “mortgage market has become more perfect, not more irresponsible”.  Some things are only clear in hindsight.  http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/29/business/29scene.html?_r=2"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031688.txt_5894
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031688.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 4:57:57 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Bill Siegel thought you might find this of interest:\nhttp://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.8911/pub_detail.asp\nMarch 8, 2011\n\nDenis McDhimmi\nWhite House National Security Adviser Speaks to Hamas-Linked Group\n\nBill Siegel\n\nOn March 6, in anticipation of Congressional hearings on domestic radicalization, Deputy National Security Adviser\nDenis McDonough stated the following:\n\n“President Obama recognizes that through our words and deeds we can either play into al Qaeda’s narrative and\nmessaging or we can challenge it and thereby undermine it. We’re determined to undermine it. For example, we\nknow there are many different reasons why individuals—from many different faiths—succumb to terrorist\nideologies. And there is no one easy profile of a terrorist. But based on extensive investigations, research and\nprofiles of the violent extremists we’ve captured or arrested, and who falsely claim to be fighting in the name of\nIslam, we know that they all share one thing—they all believe that the United States is somehow at war with\nIslam, and that this justifies violence against Americans. So we are actively and aggressively undermining that\nideology. We’re exposing the lie that America and Islam are somehow in conflict. That is why President Obama\nhas stated time and again that the United States is not and never will be at war with Islam.”\n\nThis statement encapsulates so much of what this writer has identified as the “Control Factor:” that function of\nour minds which will distort our perceptions so as not to present ourselves with the ever so fearful reality that\nconfronts us under the banner of Islam today. That is, rather than to clearly see, focus upon, and set about to\ncreate strategies to properly confront the threat which we currently face- a threat that by definition we do not\ncontrol and see little way over which to regain control- our minds essentially collude to reconstruct in a manner\nwhich deludes us with the sense that we are in control.\n\n1. The statement essentially reduces the threat we face to that of terrorism caused by al-Qaeda. By defining and\nlimiting the threat to a band of “radical extremists” who have distorted the doctrine of a great religion, we buy\ninto the sense that our military might and criminal detection methods will ultimately save the day. The fantasy is\nthat this is a problem that we can get our arms around because under our Constitutional principles, terrorism is a\nviolation that we are permitted to fight against."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032381.txt_5898
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032381.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Dangene and Jennie Enterprise", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/27/2016 7:05:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "HAPPY thanksgiving weekend\nSOMADOME"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 27, 2016, at 12:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "really fun, im in palm with the trump crowd"}, {"sender": "Dangene and Jennie Enterprise", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 12:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "soma dome ....How was your thanksgiving ? Love u"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 27, 2016, at 12:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What is the relaxation machine in waiting area"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033189.txt_5906
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033189.txt
subject: Fwd: Responding to yesterday's election
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:55:01 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Responding to yesterday's election", "body": "Look what has happened to your borough.."}, {"sender": "Dr. Bruce L. Dennis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:14 AM", "subject": "Responding to yesterday's election", "body": "Dear Packer Families, \nLike many of you, I am writing this message on very little sleep. Last night was like no other in our \npolitical memory, defying the predictions of the most erudite pundits and political \nprognosticators. \nToday, we are spending a great deal of time unpacking the election results with our students \nacross the three divisions — during morning meeting and throughout the day in Lower School \nclassrooms, in Middle School advisories, during Upper School Community time, as well as in \nmany individual classroom conversations. I write to assure you that we will do our best to handle \nthese discussions with balance, sensitivity, and fairness. \nGiven that last week's mock election among Packer's Upper School students showed that over \n8o% favored Secretary Clinton, I don't think it's a huge leap to assume that there was more \ndisappointment than joy in Packer households as results unfolded last night. At the same time, \nthere are certainly Packer families who support Mr. Trump and are pleased with this outcome. As \na school community, we have an obligation to recognize that there will be a broad array of feelings \ngenerated by the election results, and it is our responsibility as a school to make space for these \nfeelings to be expressed thoughtfully and compassionately, as well as to model the tolerance and \nacceptance of difference that are among our core values. No doubt, we have our work cut out for \nus, but I am confident in the good that we can do as a community. \nThere are abundant lessons to be learned from this election: that experts can be wrong; that our \ncountry is even more deeply divided than many of us had thought; and that abundant numbers of \nour fellow Americans feel a deep sense of despair and disaffection with the status quo of \ngovernment. For us here at school, we will use this as an opportunity to talk with your children in \nage-appropriate ways about demographics, the economy, social policy, our democratic system, \nand the rule of law. We will also talk about the world's response to yesterday's election results, our \nindividual responsibilities as citizens to continue to give voice to our beliefs, and appropriate \nchannels of political activism. On a more basic level, we will stress the importance of not being a \ngloating winner or a sore loser, and about the strength of our nation, its history of responding to \ndramatic political change, and the hopefulness of the future. \nAs for you, our families, I offer two resources. Last week at a NYSAIS heads-of-school conference \nthat I attended, the University of Pennsylvania educator Ali Michael spoke about advancing our \nnational dialogue about race. This morning Dr. Michael wrote a Huffington Post piece, \"What Do  \nWe Tell the Children?\", a moving yet direct reminder of how we, as adults, can model our \nresponses for the young people around us. Next Wednesday, November 16, from 6:3o to 8 \np.m., Semeka Smith-Williams and the PA Diversity Committee are holding a \"Post-\nElection Healing\" evening here at Packer. \nPlease reach out if you have questions, suggestions, or simply would like to share your thoughts, \nand take good care."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031526.txt_5908
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031526.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Got it.\nNow remember\nPress is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Oct 9, 2016, at 8:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "no, im out of it. donald brought out four women that said bill abused them. / they wilil feature in the\nhillary says you should give the benefit of the doubt to victims. I laid this out for you over dinner, its\ndisgraceful, but. here we are"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Times bad. R u around Tuesday?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "No , -phone today?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Can call circa 11"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 10:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 3:24:02 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "What number"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032297.txt_5909
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032297.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "dimanche 25 septembre 2016 21:04", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Im in paris all week, hope to see you and family"}, {"sender": "Lang, Caroline", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeffrey \nWould you like to go with my father at the inauguration of the exhibition on Herge, the father of « Tintin » , a \nhuge celebrity here, at le Grand Palais at 6.30 pm?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "lundi 26 septembre 2016 12:11", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, great. how are you?"}, {"sender": "Lang, Caroline", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Well what about you ? \nTell me when you are free to see each other \nYou can meet my father in front of the Grand Palais \nI will send you an email if may father decides to go at 6 pm."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "lundi 26 septembre 2016 17:04", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "can my two assistnats join, or should i go alone?"}, {"sender": "Lang, Caroline", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, 26 September 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Alone, a lot of officials will be there Ministers..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "lundi 26 septembre 2016 18:07", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "Monday, 26 September 2016 6:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can I have Castro number, I'm outside gran palais"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "mardi 27 septembre 2016 12:19", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "thanks for organizing last night. you father did not appear very well. everything ok?"}, {"sender": "Lang, Caroline", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/27/2016 10:48:58 AM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "He is tired \nAnd also depressed by the presidential campaign, I will tell you more when we see each other \nI saw the Clinton/Trump debate; she was really good"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025547.txt_5925
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025547.txt
subject: Fwd: US Saudi Arms deal but Note Blackstone Infrastructure Fund with SAMA
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard John Nawrot", "recipients": ["Terje Rod-Larsen", "Andreas Kraus", "George Henderson"], "timestamp": "May 23, 2017 at 15:13:12 GMT+4", "subject": "US Saudi Arms deal but Note Blackstone Infrastructure Fund with SAMA", "body": "Terje, the attached article appeared in todays FT, I have removed the defence part related to the US$110bn arms\ndeal but highlighted the separate deal done with Blackstone to establish a fund for US infrastructure this is akin\n/ precedent to what we seek to achieve with SAMA focused on global investment fund in Airport Infrastructure\n— Best Richard."}, {"sender": "Terje Rod-Larsen", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/27/2017 11:19:59 AM", "subject": "Fwd: US Saudi Arms deal but Note Blackstone Infrastructure Fund with SAMA", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032395.txt_5938
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032395.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ken Star", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/25/2016 5:46:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hope Santa (swim trunks donned), reindeer and sleigh successfully made it southward. Yuletide hugs, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 18, 2016, at 5:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if trump fully supports jasta , does that make the consitutional challenge moot?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028784.txt_5939
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028784.txt
subject: 2 Seminars-MONEY & POWER possible Invite List
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein", "CC <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 19 2012 05:59 PM", "subject": "2 Seminars-MONEY & POWER possible Invite List", "body": "Seminar-MONEY\n\nMarc Andreesen\nPaul Batista (Not sure this is who you mean)\nJeff Bezos\n\nSergey Brin\n\nBill Gates\n\nDanny Hillis\nDanny Kahneman\nJaron Lanier\n\nDick Merkin (?)\nMichael Milken (?)\nNathan Myhrvold\nBoris Nikolic\nLarry Page\n\nTom Pritzker\n\nEric Schmidt\n\nJim Simons\n\nJes Staley\n\nPeter Thiel\n\nIan Osborne (add Ian to both seminar lists?)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033233.txt_5944
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033233.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thorbjgn Jagland", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/16/2017 3:04:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Hope you recover quickly. We have had wonderful days. Tell me when you are coming to Paris so that we can\ntalk. I really don't understand Trump. Today I have to deal with the referendum in Turkey. Endogan is another\ndifficult to understand"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023448.txt_5948
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023448.txt
subject: Re: Highlight
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "That was fun- definitely the highlight of a day that was not without other interesting moments\n\nDon't know which was better-- the wholly unexpected surprise reminder (by a prime minister) of my\nboyfriend from 1976( who was in high school, who lived with his doting parents), or , getting creamed on\nmy producer's budget but then offered the opportunity to profess poetry for production funds . There may be\nsomeone as good in New York, but i'll never tell you and you really have a heck of a seminar table there .\nWhen do we do Whitman's \"Song of Myself\" 1-15 Who else is reading with us? I'm ready .\n\nA few other follow ups :\n\nDavid and Brigid point out that reality tv doesn't cost anything because it is, as it sounds, very low budget .\nNo writing , no special expertise or knowledge or research , no archival footage , no copyright clearance , no\nactors , no travel beyond the one location , certainly no clinton or woody allen or justice elena kagan or\ndavid brooks or Lena Dunham or even Professor New. That said , I think If were hiring the crew id do it for\nless -- probably 1, 250,000 all in . But I haven't won 10 Emmys and David has . That has value too. As does\nWebh . But I'll be more prepared for the next conversation and want to be much more prepared for\ntempleton, so thank you .\n\nT really liked Michael. I would like to send him some stuff , but in googling him I noticed that we have the\nsame birthday! May I have his email?\n\nYou are in! Yeay! Lets see what this may mean? I'll improve my numbers and you'll improve your deep\nreading ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 23, 2014", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "clinton woody kagan , do not add one penny to budget"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "Fab! And tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/24/2014 12:07:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "not sure yet talk in momig"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028974.txt_5957
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028974.txt
subject:
  Greetings, Thanks, and Top Five Questions for the Social Sciences (which Martin thought may interest you)

messages:
  [{"sender": "Moshe Hoffman", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/3/2016 4:51:28 PM", "subject": "Greetings, Thanks, and Top Five Questions for the Social Sciences (which Martin thought may interest you)", "body": "Hi Jeff,\n\nThanks again for making the time for me last time you were in town. And for your introductions to Brockman\nand Ehud. I have enjoyed all the conversations and been learning a lot. Hopefully, a book or two will come out\n\nof it eventually as well. Means a lot to me.\n\nMartin mentioned that you are thinking about the top questions in various fields and suggested I might think of\nsome of my own and pass them on to you.\n\nIn case you are interested, I list below the five biggest questions that keep me up at night, motivate my life's\nwork, and which I think ought to keep up every social scientist. Happy to discuss with you, if and when you are\n\ninterested.\n\n-Moshe\n\n1) Where do our moral and political views come from?\n\nThe bull shit answers most people accept clearly don't fit the facts; we are not discovering moral truths through\nreason, and our political views are not motivated by a desire to achieve the best policy outcomes. So what does\ndrive these beliefs? And what causes them to have the weird puzzling features they do (e.g., why is a lie of\ncommission so much worse than a lie of omission)? And what causes them to change over time (e.g., slavery\nhas been accepted as moral at many points in history)? And differ across cultures (e.g., ISIS versus the U.S.)?\nAnd across person and context (e.g., Trump vs. Bernie supporters)?\n\nMore generally, we believe and argue all sorts of crap (your vote can make a difference, Jesus loves you, all\nmen are created equal). How do these beliefs and arguments work? Are they just random ideas propagated by\nan amorphous culture, viruses taking advantage of our own psychology for their benefit, ideas that get us to do\nthe bidding of their cynical designers?\n\n2) Similarly, where do our tastes come from? Like the art we like? Or the music?\n\nSome tastes are kinda obvious. E.g., we evolved to like young curvy women because they are the most fertile.\nAnd maybe we like art that reminds us of this or of landscapes that are safe or what not. But there are many\naspects of art and music (e.g. modern art, rap) that are not universally pleasing. So what makes people like these\nthings? What properties do they need to succeed? What role does the artist or the history of the piece play in\nwhat we like? Of course, this question isn't just about art and music, but about all of our peculiar, culturally\nspecific tastes. How does culture shape our tastes? Is it completely arbitrary or is there some logic to its\ninfluence?\n\n3) Where do our political and economic institutions come from and what causes them to have the peculiar\nstructure they have?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029433.txt_5959
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029433.txt
subject:
  Fwd: Ruberto, Israel & Weiner Trusts & Estates Alert: Estate Planning After the Enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 11:00:51 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Ruberto, Israel & Weiner Trusts & Estates Alert: Estate Planning After the Enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Ruberto Israel & Weiner <info@riw.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "January 3, 2018 at 4:02:49 PM EST", "subject": "Ruberto, Israel & Weiner Trusts & Estates Alert: Estate Planning After the Enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act", "body": "January 2018\nEstate Planning After the Enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act\nOn December 22, 2017, President Trump signed the \"Tax Cuts and Jobs Act\" into law. The new legislation represents a compromise between House and Senate Republicans on their respective tax overhaul proposals, and is the most significant tax reform legislation to be enacted in over thirty years. Although the inherent complexities of the new legislation, combined with the whirlwind pace of its passage, poses many questions for analysts and tax practitioners alike as they begin to navigate the new tax system, we do have an understanding of what the new law will mean for high net worth individuals interested in advancing their estate planning goals.\nMost of the provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the \"Act\") became effective on January 1st, and will sunset (or default to prior law) after December 31, 2025, absent further congressional action. In addition to extensive income tax related changes, including modifications to the individual and corporate income tax rates, doubling of the standard income tax deduction, capping of the state and local tax deduction, elimination of the personal income tax exemption, increase in the exemption for the alternative minimum tax, and decrease in the mortgage interest deduction, the Act temporarily doubles the federal estate, generation-skipping transfer (\"GST\") and gift tax exemption amounts, thereby offering high net worth families enhanced planning opportunities.\nFull Alert\n="}]


thread_id: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016465.txt_5960
source_file: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016465.txt
subject: RE: request
messages:
  [{"sender": "Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>", "recipients": ["Susan Edelman <sedelman@nypost.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:27 PM", "subject": "RE: request", "body": "Hi Sue,\n\nRegarding your first question: pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 50-b, our office’s practice in appellate sex\ncrimes matters is to file documents under seal. This is not particular to People v. Epstein; it is routine\nacross our appellate filings. My understanding is that it is also the Appellate Division’s (the court's)\npractice to maintain such seal.\n\nThat being said, | have discussed your second question with our attorneys. If the Post petitions the\ncourt, and the court asks the People for our positon, we will not oppose the petition for a redacted brief.\n\nThanks.\n\nDanny Frost\nDirector of Communications\nManhattan District Attorney Cy Vance, Jr.\n\n212-335-9400 // @ManhattanDA"}, {"sender": "Susan Edelman <sedelman@nypost.com>", "recipients": ["Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 6, 2018 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re: request", "body": "Hi Dan,\n\nPlease explain why the DA's office didn't file a redacted brief, but rather covered up all the facts.\nIf we filed a petition for a redacted brief, would the DA's office fight it or cooperate?\n\nThank you,\n\nSue\n\nSusan Edelman"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026672.txt_5962
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026672.txt
subject: Did you see that Trump retweeted my story?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/17/2017 4:29:23 PM", "subject": "Did you see that Trump retweeted my story?", "body": "I think my wife is going to change the lock on the door tonight.\nhttps://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/842739155230740481"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032663.txt_5969
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032663.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["??"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "?\n??"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Of courses"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Unknown"], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You are welcome at my house always . And more private"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. just send me the address again and the code to the door so i can get to the second floor? and send\nme the day and time.\nthnx"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Unknown"], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "10pm should I bring special cake from New York"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sorry that is 2512 for the gate &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Unknown"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 9:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i mat the door but i will wait for my time.. i dont want to come early to find trump in your housee@©Q"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Unknown"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 11:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no come now !!!"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/9/2017 7:00:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i forget to ask .. is there any new update about the saudi project that i sent you??"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022214.txt_5988
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022214.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 11:32 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Apparently Brazil is a hot investment place now (?) It is more about the offset part than the jet deal. France, Sweden and USA are all lobbying to get the jet deal as aviation is tied into potentially big tourism deals. (36 planes) I was just on a call with a guy in Sweden who is dealing with this... I never know if the stories are real, but he claims to work with the Brazilian president, Obama, Warren Buffet etc.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "brazil, has tried to buy fighters, in the past, they don't have a lot of money,"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 3:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, one of the most complex negotiations they re very strange. Someone buys fighters but with the fighter money, some must be used for specific third party items. I will buy your pussy for 10k, but with 2 of the 10 you have to buy me food. And to make matter worse I need to borrow thev10 from you."}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you understand offset agreements? I got asked to be involved in negotiating some of the deals between Brazil and other countries in regards to the purchase of new fighter jets.. What is an offset service provider?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023312.txt_5991
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023312.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:39 PM", "subject": null, "body": "on the returns. a cashflow that is misleading helped prepare financial statements ( april ) Oversight on new\ngrats- first at 22 and then at 19 that were done without my consultation and were \"resolved\" soley as a result\nof my last minute intervention. . 600 million in after tax savings was just accomplished. (BTW- for some\nreason you left the 30 million outstanding that I had said should only be done\" if” that was my additional\n\nfee. and not used for non biz purposes and not art.\n\nSorry but .,\n\nin June and then again Sept, we both agreed to a 50% of phaidon payout first projected at 20 . but less when\nartspace and debt taken out, - then only after weeks, when you delayed any detailed discussion of money\nwanting to give the issue a thoughtful response ( which I fully understand ) . you unilaterally changed our\nagreement.. 5m would be reserved for the future ? . and out of the remaining 15m ,? 1 would receive only a\nthird. (note: I'm confident that both the debt , and the art space investment will also lead to a write- off of\nanother 30 m. plus ) In my dining room ,you were surprised when I said that i require most people to pay\ntheir advisory fee up front so that I am assured that I will be properly compensated for my work when\nstrategies are implemented . you may recall that you appeared offended and said \" are you suggesting that 1\nwould go back on my word \" I said no , of course not ! you are my closest of friends ,but my experience is\nthat when amounts get large, people tend to get unhappy when it actually comes time for them to pay.\n\nI include below the email i sent to you on April 15, the day i was examining your returns It laid out my\nunderstanding of the compensation agreed for a transaction of the magnitude to the penny of the one just\ncompleted.ic 600m When it appeared that the transcation would and could go foward I was the first to point\nout that our agreement would cost you too much money, therefore\n\nmore details\n\nFrom day one I proposed to discount our agreement toa 50-60 million range. An extremely fair price for\nall the transactions just completed . including Phaidon. - I was never told that this was out of range. in\nfact, alternative methods of payment .ie my plane, or an -in-kind payment were discussed (\n\nie including keeping the 30m portion of the fee outstanding till March ) ,I provided , only because you\nspecifically requested a detailed step by step execution plan and reviewed all documents that 1 was given\naccess to. ( Phaidon was never forthcoming ) in order to make my many corrections . ( as i said more needed\non phaidon ). Iwas then told that Alans involvement warranted a discount. Even in the best of light ,\nthough it is beyond question that not one time in the three years of his retainer has he ever proposed a\nunique idea. (including any way to deal with the use issue on debras death ,or even the most basic review of\nyour largest asset by far , the BRH agreement. ) O.K. - lets say he made a contribution to the plan and stretch\nreality beyond the pale and say it was 50 %. though no one could posit such a large amount unless they were\nwearing a clown suit. , the payment and our formula of 37 percent associated with the deal was known . It\nhad both sent in writing and spoken about on the phone numerous times , a detailed execution plan was\nprovided . then and only then, after the entire transaction was laid out for the group to follow You told\n\nme that after a number of conversations with brad karp that a total of only 20m would be paid , (and even that\nwas more than you originally contemplated ) for both transactions . Leon I feel It was remarkably unfair. Did\nbrad even knew of our prior agreements.? ?, I would ask that you I and Brad karp sit together if you think it\nwould be helpful. . I would like to send him this email, with your consent of course. Ifthe transactions were\nnever consummated , i would not be owed a dime, however , the expected fee was known up front. , the\ndetailed step by step plan was followed and overseen by me, the amount that I had requested before the\ntransaction had even begun, had already been heavily discounted, out of friendship, . I believe the decision re\nonly paying 20m has frankly , left me felling quite uneasy. and colors the view about the Athene or\nRothschild transaction.\n\nyou've agreed that"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016677.txt_6000
source_file: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016677.txt
subject: Town Sewage Effluent
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jim Bowser", "recipients": ["Patricia Gayle-Gordon"], "timestamp": "01/22/2009 01:54 PM", "subject": "Town Sewage Effluent", "body": "Pat, I believe one of the questions asked was what was the sewage flows to West Palm Beach. Here is an email to Peter sent on 1/9/09."}, {"sender": "Jim Bowser/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Peter B Elwell/PalmBeach@PalmBeach"], "timestamp": "01/09/2009 10:36 AM", "subject": "Town Sewage Effluent", "body": "Peter, as requested, attached is sewage flow data from our Lake Worth Billings and ECRWRF monthly report. I am seeking the peak daily flows, but that is going to take additional time.\n\nBase upon the monthly flows, here is the average daily flow for each entity in Fiscal Year 2008 expressed as million gallons a day:\n\nMonth WPB LW\nOct 2.70 0.654\nNov 2.39 0.593\nDec 2.23 0.627\nJan 2.33 0.668\nFeb 2.36 0.691\nMar 2.23 0.672\nApr 2.12 0.561\nMay 2.02 0.408\nJun 2.09 0.389\nJul 2.22 0.552\nAug 2.33 0.537\nSep 2.54 0.563\nYearly Ave 2.30 0.563\n\nTotal average daily flow from Town to ECRWRF 2.863 million gallons a day.\n\nabe\n\nSewage Flows WPB and Ly Fy 2008. pdf"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028960.txt_6004
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028960.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "This is the program David Marr initiated, developed by Shimon Ullman and others. Makes sense, and there are some interesting results. David was a friend, and we often discussed these topics. In fact, his famous three levels adapted a model from generative grammar. But there was always the fundamental problem I mentioned. Vision is an input system, crafting coherent images from lines, points of light, etc. Language is used for that purpose too, but it’s not what language is.\n\nThat fundamental difference, along with the fact that the principles involved seem quite different, has always been a stumbling block to seeking any link."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 24, 2015 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "thought you might be interested in a new version of the percentage agreement between stalin and\n\nchurchill. Saudi and Iran doing the same , dividing spheres of influence... it seems few people paying\nattention to palestinians . maybe next generation. - israel going further right it appears. I find that media\ninduced fear is driving world markets. . very odd. gas prices down nobody shopping, . hotel prices down less\ntravel. commodity prices way down, little building. luxury market decimated. no russians or chinese\n\nplayers. . still virtually zero interest rates. . borrowing not up, fear and paralysis. , (Iadd these topics as to\nthese at least, i can speak with a modicum of knowledge )"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/24/2015 5:37:14 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Very interesting topics. Would like to hear more from you about them, when we have a chance. Is it worldwide, or\nmostly here?\n\nMy impression is that the fear is mostly in the US. There’s nothing in (much more vulnerable) Europe comparable to the\nVisa Waiver program (insanely targeting Iran, which has not been involved in terrorism, while exempting Saudi Arabia,\nthe source of almost all jihadi terrorism). Or Trump-style ban them all. Or Cruz-style carpet-bomb them. For a long\ntime, probably back to colonial days, this has been a very frightened country, maybe the safest in the world but also the\nmost frightened. Impressions.\n\nSometimes it’s quite weird. By accident, I took the first flight PanAm 103 after the Lockerbie bombing, together with an\nold friend, a veteran Middle East correspondent. It must have been the safest flight in human history. The plane was\nempty. We were bumped up to first class because there was no one there."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016471.txt_6007
source_file: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016471.txt
subject: request
messages:
  [{"sender": "Susan Edelman", "recipients": ["Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, December 4, 2018 6:34 PM", "subject": "request", "body": "Hi Danny,\n\nFollowing up on the Epstein case:"}, {"sender": "Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>", "recipients": ["Susan Edelman <sedelman@nypost.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 12:28 PM", "subject": "request", "body": "Hi Sue — I’ve confirmed that the brief is filed under seal. It contains the following header on the cover\npage: “Pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 50-b, the identities of the victims, who are the victims of sex\noffenses, shall be confidential, and this document shall not be made available for public inspection.”\n\nAccordingly we must decline your request. Thanks."}, {"sender": "Susan Edelman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "request", "body": "Thanks. Can you send me a POF of the cover page?\n\nWho issued that order?\n\nWe always get such court documents -- with the names and ID of victims redacted.\nThe whole document is not withheld."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032342.txt_6010
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032342.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Kraus"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 9:59:45 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\n\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021090.txt_6011
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021090.txt
subject: RE: Daily Beast
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Peter Green"], "timestamp": "03 April 2011 12:36", "subject": "Re: Daily Beast", "body": "I cant open anything that is not underlined in blue sorry Peter i am not good at computer stuff.When are you coming here so i can call Catherine Crier please nothing to maryanne about thsi jonathan"}, {"sender": "Peter Green", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, April 3 2011 03:49 PM", "subject": "RE: Daily Beast", "body": "You are mentioned !\nJeffrey Epstein's Society Friends Close Ranks\nby Alexandra Wolfe"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032532.txt_6012
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032532.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I am seeing a little bit I don't think it will turn into romance I am a bit old and not tall enough but she seems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship Commison it came through Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:19:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "careful she is nottrustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "a 2 timer?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:27 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "worse"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:29:13 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jeffrey please help me here is she a hooker"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021819.txt_6022
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021819.txt
subject: Re: we'll see
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@mail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "notable?"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Apparently...\n\nThey are now asking how my parents bought a building in town...implying it was all the money they got for selling me :)\nGetting ugly.."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@mail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "only met Jeffrey Epstein, after | was adult. ( over 18). | was never, ever, his \"sex slave \"\n\n. obviously a lurid chauvenistic categorization. which in my opinion could only have been\n\nmade by some loser of a repressed male reporter. He was always kind , funny and generous to\nme . These fantasy fabrications made by a delusional thief. ( charged with stealing from the burger\nplace and which she worked, though she claimed to paid thousands of dollars in cash and held at\nthe beck and call of the genious tycoon. ) . Her story telling had it been done while sleeping would\nhave been called dreaming, if awake, hallucinaitons but to the English press they are referred to\nas allegations . She claimed in the minutest of detail , her dinner with President Clinton on the\nCaribean Island, How he arrived . ( by black heli). where he sat. ,(on jeffreys left.) a\n\n21st century tale of power, sex, money. The fact is that this story is total make believe ,\nfabricated on purpose to gain tabloid attention ,and easily refuted by readily availalble travel\nrecords of a former president. . it defies belief that any person would take seriously sucha\npreposterous story. little different than her telling her father that she met the queen, whoops- he\nbelieved her though her mother at the relevant time complained that she must have been engaging\nin satan worship and asked that she be put her in a drug home. cmon. |am currenty a\nprofessional pilot with a spotless record. | have a checklist that | follow before every flight to verify\nthat things are what they are supposed to be , checking her story which the presss has refused to\ndo would serve the public well. In this case human error is merely a euphmisn for hijacking the\ntruth ,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033582.txt_6024
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033582.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 5:29:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yikes your birthday coming up next month"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 12:25:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty left"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi jeffrey hope all is well | think you are going to have a winderful life from now on in your opinion how much is left in this\nmarket it's been a trump triumph | gave him some money through woody best jonathan"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032254.txt_6025
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032254.txt
subject: Re: Are you around?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Are you around?", "body": "paris 011 331 441 70210"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Are you around?", "body": "Any news?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Are you around?", "body": "none.. trump lawsuit thrown quickly out.."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 11, 2016 2:52:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Are you around?", "body": "all bizarre."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032424.txt_6027
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032424.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not to disturb you, but I am struck by the similar mannerisms between Trump and McGyver"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 6:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im happy to negotiate with developer on your behalf. . or just give your talking points. allowances\n. commisions fees. free maintence etc"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What if I get it and can't resell?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "On Jan 12, 2017, at 9:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iunderstand the fear. thats why we will condition the close on how the others sell"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemm|er", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 2:14:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "That's smart. :-)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030823.txt_6028
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030823.txt
subject: Fw: Little Hodiaki [I]
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steven Elkman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/23/2011 5:29:30 PM", "subject": "Fw: Little Hodiaki [I]", "body": "Regards,\njac\nwww.carbonacapital.com"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030837.txt_6033
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030837.txt
subject:
  J.P. Morgan exclusive conference call on Thursday, November 8th at 4pm EST: "Post-election insight: The road ahead"

messages:
  [{"sender": "us.gio@jpmorgan.com", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "11/6/2012 10:24:50 PM", "subject": "J.P. Morgan exclusive conference call on Thursday, November 8th at 4pm EST: \"Post-election insight: The road ahead\"", "body": "We are pleased to invite you to an exclusive J.P. Morgan Private Bank conference call, “Post-election insights: The road ahead,” on Thursday, November 8 at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. \n\nThe call will feature Peter Scher, Head of Corporate Responsibility for JPMorgan Chase. Peter is an undisputed expert in political matters, having spent nearly a decade in government service as U.S. Special Trade Negotiator and Ambassador in the Clinton administrations. The discussion will take a closer look at the election results, focusing on the political and fiscal implications and what they mean for our clients globally. \n\nThe invitation below contains full details of the event. \n\nYou are invited to participate in an exclusive conference call\n\nPost-election insights: The road ahead \n\nThursday, November 8, 2012 at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time\n\nHosted by\n\nJohn Duffy, Chief Executive Officer, J.P. Morgan U.S. Private Bank\n\nFeaturing\n\nPeter Scher, Head of Corporate Responsibility, JPMorgan Chase & Co.\n\nAs the new political landscape begins to take shape, join us to hear Peter discuss:\n\n*         Global implications of election results \n\n*         Impact on regulatory and “fiscal cliff” legislation\n\n*         Bipartisanship in the new environment\n\nTO LISTEN TO THE CALL\n\nToll-free: 877.804.2965\n\nInternational Toll: 706.902.2073\n\nConference ID: 68693542\n\nABOUT PETER L. SCHER\n\nPeter L. Scher is the Executive Vice President and Head of Corporate Responsibility for JPMorgan Chase & Co and a member of the firm’s Executive Committee. Scher oversees Global Government Relations and Public Policy, Global Philanthropy, the Office of Environmental Affairs, and the firm’s Social Finance business, which provides financial services to the impact investing market. He led the firm’s development of the Brookings-JP Morgan Chase Global Cities Initiative, a five-year effort to help the 100 largest U.S. metropolitan areas become more competitive in the global economy. \n\nPrior to joining JPMorgan Chase in June of 2008, Scher was the Managing Partner of the Washington, D.C. office of Mayer Brown LLP, where he had been a partner since 2000 and earlier served as the chairman of the firm's Government and Global Trade Practice, overseeing that practice in the United States, Europe and Asia. \n\nScher spent nearly a decade in government service. Nominated by President Clinton and confirmed by the United States Senate, he served as the U.S. Special Trade Negotiator, with the rank of Ambassador from 1997-2000. In his service as U.S. Special Trade Ambassador, he was one of the lead U.S. negotiators on China's entry into the World Trade Organization, as well as negotiations on trade issues with countries in Europe, Asia and Latin America. He earlier served as the Chief of Staff in the Office of the United States Trade Representative and in the same position at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Scher previously served on Capitol Hill as the majority staff director for the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, and as the Chief of Staff to U.S. Senator Max Baucus.\n\nScher has been active in civic and political activities throughout his career. He served on the staff for the Clinton-Gore campaigns of 1992 and 1996, as well as the Kerry-Edwards campaign of 2004. He has been a member of the Atlantic Council of the United States Working Group on U.S.–European Union Trade and Regulatory Issues and the Asia Task Force for the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In 2009, Scher was appointed by the White House to serve as U.S. Representative to the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum (APEC) Business Advisory Council. \n\nScher serves on the Board of Trustees of American University and is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He received his B.A. from American University in 1983 and his J.D. from AU's Washington College of Law in 1987."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032430.txt_6034
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032430.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 3:00:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I'm going 2/13-2/17. Good news on biz. Do I have to wear a head scarf??"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 9:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when are you going ? bizis ok. my guy is flying from new york dubai on the 20th , his plane. i will organzie fun time there for you"}, {"sender": "Kathy Konmnes", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When I go to Dubai on Emirates, do I need to go first or is business class good enough given that I only care about slepeping?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 9:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "nice"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got hired by Apple this week to do a patent trial."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 9:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iunderstand the fear. thats why we will condition the close on how the others sell"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What if I get it and can't resell?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 6:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im happy to negotiate with developer on your behalf. . or just give your talking points. allowances . commisions fees. free maintence etc"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not to disturb you, but I am struck by the similar mannerisms between Trump and McGyver"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032850.txt_6039
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032850.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon Po"], "timestamp": "2/10/2016 7:07:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Wow"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 10 February 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Its getting scary. The stories you could tell..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033596.txt_6040
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033596.txt
subject: Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft
messages:
  [{"sender": "Eric Roth qq", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "Jeffrey-\n\nI need to start off by stating that it is not my intent to go around Shawn Lancaster on this — Shawn is a friend.\nThis being said, I have received e-mails from both you and Larry this weekend.\nI called Larry and he said I should send you an e-mail.\n\nI called a close friend of mine inquiring about the GV market and aircraft that are “not published”. As of today, there are\neight (8) of these aircraft that are not yet on the market.\n\nLet me know if you would like to speak with him and by what means (you call him, he call you, call Larry?....whatever).\n\nBy the way, his company sold Trumps 727 and got Trump a very attractive number for an aircraft that was on it’s way to\na museum.\n\nHope all is well.\nSincerely,\n\nEric Roth\n\nPresident\n\nInternational Jet Interiors\n2221 Smithtown Avenue\n\nLong Island MacArthur Airport\nRonkonkoma, NY 11779"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Eric Rot"], "timestamp": "6/27/2011 4:45:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "of course i will speak send me his number , or have him call 212 750 9895"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032688.txt_6042
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032688.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 6:11:02 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trtump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025901.txt_6048
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025901.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 05, 2015 7:48 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Only go to Greece if you feel well , I just had to send my plane to bring another lefty friend back from\n\nAthens to see a Jew doctor in New York ."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012019.txt_6052
source_file: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012019.txt
subject: RE: New York
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeff Fuller", "recipients": ["Jean Lue Brunel"], "timestamp": "11/12/2014 11:49 (GMT-05:00)", "subject": "RE: New York", "body": "fean Lue,\n\nlam really sorry you feel so bad and { know it has been a mental and psychological frustration. As you\nknow | chose to partner with you due to your reputation in the business for being a top scout and\ndeveloping a couple world class agencies in the past. | knew what you could bring and | knew what |\ncould bring and contribute and | thought it would be a great partnership. Clearly, | never expected to\nhave the level of challenges we have had recruiting new models over the last several years. | could have\nnever foreseen the problem of your friendship with Jeffrey Epstein turning into the situation it has\nwhere you are seen as guilty by association when you have never done anything or even been convicted\nofacrime. Frankly, | don’t understand the necessity for Conchita Sarnoff or anyone else to continue to\ndefame your name and MC? by asscciation.\n\nIt is true that we constantly have to justify ourselves when recruiting new models. The industry is\nextremely competitive and as a parent myself if faced by the same information and having to make a\ntough decision between too agencies | would not pick MC2 if | saw the article online about you. You\nhave to read closely to see there is not a charge against you but the implication is strong and of course\nnow days everyone believes everything they read online even more than the traditional newspapers of\nthe past.\n\n| know you are now feeling like a liability to MC2. But you personally are not a liability to MC2 but this\npublished information online is a liability. We are not a large enough company, nor do we have the\ncapacity to fight this on a global level. On a google search in America we have put enough information\nonline to not have it popping up so blatantly but we have no controls over the rest of the world or the\nfinances to control this situation and we are affected as every major model agency recruits it’s best\nmodels from all the various countries abroad. This has stunted our growth and our billing over the past\n6 or 7 years. In fact, we do not even know who avoids us based on finding this information. | have been\nsurprised how challenging it is for us to grow due to this problem.\n\n| have also had a tremendous amount of worries from our clients that we are vendors for that are large\nAmerican corporations likes Kohls, JC Penney, Sears, Nordstrom, Target, Neiman Marcus, Macys, Saks,\nBelk, and so forth that require vendor agreements and for us to be considered an upstanding\ncompany. It really worries me as some of those companies have disassociated themselves from what"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032526.txt_6059
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032526.txt
subject: Re: SIT Customs
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:57 AM", "subject": "Re: SIT Customs", "body": "Jeffrey \nDue to Staffing issues customs cannot use North Ramp only PreClear in main building. \nTrump is suppose to depart 4pm. Latest 4:30pm \nFlight time: 2+25min \nDo you want PBI customs or PreClear STT? \nThx \nLarry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 16, 2017, at 11:58 AM", "subject": "Re: SIT Customs", "body": "pre clear. heli at 2. thanks"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/16/2017 4:12:22 PM", "subject": "Re: SIT Customs", "body": "Ok 2pm heli \nPreClear"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025929.txt_6061
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025929.txt
subject: Fwd: Gingrich view of Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kenny Shirley [nailitiii@?]", "recipients": ["Danny Shurden", "Brad Bowen"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 12:11 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "March 9, 2016 at 9:26:23 AM CST", "subject": "Fwd: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "SUBJECT; GINGRICH VIEW OF TRUMP\n\nUnderstanding Donald Trump The Washington Times January 8, 2016 by Newt Gingrich\n\nDonald Trump is a genuine phenomenon. He may or may not become the Republican nominee for president. He may or may not win the presidency even if he becomes the nominee. Yet it is clear that he is a phenomenon and that any history of the 2016 presidential race will have to spend a good bit of time analyzing Trump and his impact.\n\nFrom the time he announced on June 16, Trump has dominated social and mainstream media. He dominates the conversation despite the lack of paid advertising. Trump says outrageous things and his supporters shrug it off. At every turn, his poll numbers continue to rise.\n\nAs a step toward understanding this amazing performance, I spent part of the Christmas break reading his first bestseller, ‘The Art of the Deal’. Written in 1987, this book is a classic among American business books and has influenced a generation of entrepreneurs. Trump wrote ‘The Art of the Deal’ when he was 41 years old and having a successful run. The book’s popularity contributed to Time Magazine’s decision to feature Donald Trump on its cover in January 1989.\n\nThe portrait that emerges from this easy-to-read and remarkably interesting book is of an aggressive, ambitious person who is constantly pushing, constantly learning, and always seeking the next challenge. Reporters and analysts who are trying to understand Trump would be well served by slowing down and reading this nearly three-decade-old bestseller."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028936.txt_6072
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028936.txt
subject: an article you may both hate. or like.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/10/2015 8:09:42 PM", "subject": "Fwd: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "September 10, 2015 at 12:01:39 PM MST", "subject": "RE: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Then we're in complete agreement.\n\nNoam"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 2:46 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "I couldn't agree more. Re ridicule. I never suggest ridiculing people. However by pointing out the inconsistency,\nor contravening evidence associated with various ideas, including for example American exceptionalism, then\nwe are essentially subjecting ideas to ridicule. That is what I meant."}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Sep 10, 2015, at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Thanks for sending. A wide area of agreement, but not total.\n\nOn confronting dogma, I of course agree — though in my opinion the secular religions — nationalist fanaticism, etc. — are\nmuch more dangerous. And if some find rational discussion offensive — as, for example, mainstream academics find\ndismantling myths of \"American exceptionalism\" or \"Israeli self-defense\" or Obama's mass murder campaign, etc.,\noffensive — so be it.\n\nBut I don't see why that should extend to ridicule. That includes astrologists. Astronomers can refute astrology, while\nrecognizing that perfectly honest and deluded people may believe it and should be treated with respect, while their\nbeliefs are confronted with evidence. I also don't see why we should ridicule religious dogma, just as I don't think we\nshould ridicule the much more pernicious secular dogmas. Rather, we should respond to irrational belief with argument\nand evidence, while recognizing that their advocates (like most of the intellectual world in the case of secular dogma)\nare people who we should be responding to but without ridiculing them. It may be hard sometimes. For example, when\nthe icon and founding father of sober non-sentimental Realism in International Affairs informs us that the US, unlike\nother countries, has a \"transcendental purpose,\" and the fact that it constantly acts in contradiction to its purpose\ndoesn't matter because the facts are just \"abuse of history\" while real history is \"the evidence of history as our minds\nreflect it,\" then it's hard to avoid ridicule. But we should. There's no point ridiculing virtually the entire IR profession\nand the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads to major human disasters.\n\nOn Davis, I frankly think that's a non-issue. If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions of employment\nrequire (including following the law), then she can quit and look for another job. As in any other such case.\n\nNoam"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky", "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM", "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "hope all is well.\n\nLawrence\n\nhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032268.txt_6073
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032268.txt
subject: Re: Oh boy!
messages:
  [{"sender": "Heather Mann", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Oh boy!", "body": "So the last few days have been very interesting over here - what do you think!? Xx"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "28 Jun 2016, at 19:00", "subject": "Re: Oh boy!", "body": "uncertainty ahead. thats all anyone can responsbliy say"}, {"sender": "Heather Mann", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "6/28/2016 6:38:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Oh boy!", "body": "Trump or Hilary?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033176.txt_6078
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033176.txt
subject: FW: Emailing - Trump 1_trump.pdf
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/13/2016 10:36:57 PM", "subject": "FW: Emailing - Trump 1_trump.pdf", "body": "Attachments: Trump 1_trump.pdf\nImportance: High"}, {"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 13, 2016 6:36 PM", "subject": "Emailing - Trump 1_trump.pdf", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032878.txt_6080
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032878.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 14, 2016 4:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "dont know how well you know tom barrack he is great."}, {"sender": "Peter Thiel", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:58 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Who is that?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "7/14/2016 12:01:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He will be a speaker at the convention. he runs colony capital. solid, great real estate\njudgement. . donalds fund raiser. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2016-05-3 1/tom-barrack-the-\ndonald-trump-i-know"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031775.txt_6085
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031775.txt
subject:
  Mueller's Star Witness Against Trump Once Arrested For Child Porn, Hung Out With Pedos Clinton And Epstein (Photo) —Tea Party Pac

messages:
  [{"sender": "DAVID SCHOEN", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/22/2019 12:11:49 PM", "subject": "Mueller's Star Witness Against Trump Once Arrested For Child Porn, Hung Out With Pedos Clinton And Epstein (Photo) —Tea Party Pac", "body": "This nut site today has you as an informant for mueller and as being friends with another informant,\nNadler. I assume they don't realize they are undercutting their friend in the white House as well Re: \nAcosta and the Prez himself. I ordinarily would not send a whacko site but this one gets a lot of play.\nhttps://teapartypac.org/muellers-star-witness-against-trump-once-arrested-for-child-porn-hung-out-with-\npedos-clinton-and-epstein-photos/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033162.txt_6089
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033162.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/19/2012 5:57:05 AM", "subject": null, "body": "I'm in Istanbul, private meeting of asian, middle eastern + north african families. \nApparently Donald Trump is also in town today to open the Trump Tower Istanbul."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033353.txt_6105
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033353.txt
subject: trump praising dershowitz..
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn [a", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/29/2019 9:59:45 PM", "subject": "trump praising dershowitz..", "body": "http://www.newshounds.us/trump attacks fox judge napolitano opining obstructed justice deserves impeac hment 042819"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032485.txt_6110
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032485.txt
subject: Fwd: production: 16db-stocks published
messages:
  [{"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/16/2017 1:36:00 AM", "subject": "Fwd: production: 16db-stocks published", "body": "Channeling you! Maybe even the big guy gives it a read. What? This? From the failing NYT?"}, {"sender": "Scoop Notifications <scoop-notifications@nytimes.com>", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr."], "timestamp": "February 15, 2017 at 8:25:29 PM EST", "subject": "production: 16db-stocks published", "body": "Hi Landon Thomas Jr. - \n16db-stocks has been published. \nThe URL is: http://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/15/business/dealbook/stock-market-investment-trump.html \nPlease consider sharing the article on social platforms. \nThank you!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031452.txt_6114
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031452.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 4:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "hawain tropic girl\nlauren petrella"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 10:17:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Do you mind if I pass Petrella's contact on to a political reporter? I won't do it unless you say OK because after that I would have no say as to where story goes. Let me know -- its not a big deal for me either way. But at some point this stuff will come out -- as long he continues to top polls."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033435.txt_6116
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033435.txt
subject: Re: Call from New Yorker.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 8:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Ok. Best to make reversible errors\nI’ve written note for exit strategy 1. Not going to send for few days.\n\nGoing to treat it all as a game till I maybe see her in Beijing and out of character ignore and look past her bad\nbehavior."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "unclear if you meant you ve written notes to yourself re exit or a note you were thinking of sending - BAD\nFORM if latter. you both have still not agreed the rules of the game. so difficult to play . you have laid out\n- this is whati want. . but actually , how it would work , and what her freedoms are. could be . yours.. are\nessential to the plan. I think much of this is your uncertainty and not hers. sorry. and yours is infectious"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers <a", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 9:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "It was latter. Why bad form. Supposed to be face to face?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 9:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "this is only the first quarter of the game. if you call atime out, its on the field and done with dignity, you cant\nretreat into the locker room and send a note to the opposing side. _in the next quarter she will appreciate\nwhatever you've said with respect and founded on strength. you care very much for this person. you might\nwant to demonstrate that. a note does the very opposite. . its like trump firing comey. :)"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 1:45:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Hmmm.\nI think sometimes written communication shows seriousness of thought but see your point"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023056.txt_6117
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023056.txt
subject: Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmaxl@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe, \nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine \nMaxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend. \nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon \ntomorrow. My telephone numbers are_______________________________________\n\n1. says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was \naged 15. Ms Maxwell led Virginia upstairs on her first visit to him at his Palm Beach house. Mr Epstein was \nnaked on massage table. \nMs Maxwell initiated a bisexual encounter during which Ms Maxwell rubbed her own breasts on Mr Epstein \nand directed to copy her. \nPlease respond to these allegations and all others in the original Jane Doe 102 complaint. \n2. Ms Maxwell took part in numerous other sexual encounters involving her assistant \nand Mr Epstein. \n3. Ms Maxwell kept sex toys and costumes in the Palm Beach mansion and dressed prior to sex \nsessions with Mr Epstein. S Maxwell herself wore black vinyl during sex sessions with Mr Epstein. \n4. Mia. was paid between US $200 and $ 5000 US sex, depending on whether it involved travel and other \nmen. \n5, Virginia was required to have sex with friends of Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein, including Glenn Dubin, Les \nWexner, Ehud Barak, former Senator George Mitchell and Stephen Kosslyn. \n6. Ms Maxwell introduced to Prince Andrew in 2001 at Ms Maxwell's London house where \nhad sex with him. subsequently was directed to meet him at Mr Epstein's New York house IL.. \nMaxwell directed to sit on Andrew's knee with Johanna Sjoberg. Andrew groped both girls. Ms \nMaxwell directed after this to have sex with Andrew. \nMs Maxwell and Mr Epstein subsequently travelled with IMPto Little St James where she was directed \nto stage an orgy for Andrew and Mr Epstein during which she performed oral sex on \nthem. \n7. was paid extra by Mr Epstein or his employees for these sexual encounters. \n8. Ms Maxwell knewEns age and laughed about it when she introduced her to Andrew. \n9. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein tried to persuade to bear his child. \n10. After sexual encounters with male friends of Mr Epstein and/or Ms Maxwell, Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein \nwould ask explicit questions about what went on. \n11. Mr Epstein's residences in Florida and New York had surveillance cameras that taped the sex sessions and \ntaped Virginia even in the bathroom. \n12. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein arranged for Ehud Barak to have sex with several girls, often at Mr Epstein's \nPalm Beach house. \n13. Ms Maxwell piloted President Bill Clinton in a helicopter to a dinner on Little St James where two \nbrunettes Ms Maxwell, and Mr Epstein were at the table. \n14. Mr Epstein bought Ms Maxwell the helicopter, homes in New York and London and a Mercedes. \n\nAnnette Witheridge \nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday"}, {"sender": "GMAX <gmaxl@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["The Duke"], "timestamp": "Fri Mar 04 16:31:26 2011", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "The Duke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "What? I don't know any of this. How are you responding?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["The Duke"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 04:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "just got it two minutes ago.. I ye asked g lawyers to send a letter. Not sure„ it is so salcisous and ridiculous, im \nnot sure how to respond„ the only person she didn't have sex with was Elvis"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022348.txt_6122
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022348.txt
subject: Fwd: front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!
messages:
  [{"sender": "Justin Blackhall", "recipients": ["William L. Blum <EIMIIMI>", "Robert A. Solomon"], "timestamp": "February 29, 2012 10:06:39 PM EST", "subject": "front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": "http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/29/obama-bundler-works-Ts-virgin-islands-tax-adviser/"}, {"sender": "William L. Blum", "recipients": ["Erika Kellerhals", "Edward B. Reynolds, Jr."], "timestamp": "February 29, 2012 10:26:26 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": "Did you guys see this?\nBill"}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals", "recipients": ["W"], "timestamp": "February 29, 2012 10:41:17 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren lndyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/1/2012 3:54:12 AM", "subject": "Fwd: front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031826.txt_6126
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031826.txt
subject: Re: You should see this movie/documentary
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2/6/2011 11:18:44 AM", "subject": "Re: You should see this movie/documentary", "body": "I have \nimage001.jpg"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030980.txt_6134
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030980.txt
subject: Fwd: Wolff Book
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/29/2019 10:38:12 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Wolff Book", "body": "the public records show i was the stalking horse in the bankruptcy, not 55 million but I had bid 36 m"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 29, 2019 at 6:28 PM", "subject": "Wolff Book", "body": "i am sure you read attached articles already on internet..\nhttps://www.rawstory.com/2019/05/new-book-paints-sordid-picture-of-trump-real-estate-deal-involving-russian-oligarch-and-jeffrey-epstein/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029288.txt_6137
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029288.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 105 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Summers Te", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "Your pal should stay out of press.\nPublic link to manafort will be a disaster.\nThis is a staggering shit show."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Summers (a"], "timestamp": "10/27/2017 2:50:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "saudi?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029209.txt_6138
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029209.txt
subject: Re: Reminder Ed Boyden
messages:
  [{"sender": "Neil Gershenfeld", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2013, at 12:32 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Confirming lunch noon Friday at my office, E15-401. Sunglasses and beach balls optional, hopefully this will be a warm-up for meeting in more entertaining venues."}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Neil Gershenfeld"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:08 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Good morning Neil.. .1 am afraid Jeffrey must cancel his trip up today...he is sick in bed and not well. I am so very sorry to do this last minute. Hopefully we can circle back to this soon."}, {"sender": "Ed Boyden <1.>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "July 14, 2014, 4:50:47 AM EDT", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Sorry again for that last minute cancellation in the Spring -- alas, the perils of running a new center, that I no longer control my schedule like in the good old days. But the Obama BRAIN Initiative is running strong, and MIT has a good bid for a seat at the table, so that is good. Want to revisit a time for a chat? My schedule is now much more free, thanks to these BRAIN initiative activities launching..."}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 17, 2014", "subject": "Re: Reminder Ed Boyden", "body": "Reminder: Would you like me to set up a call for you with Ed Boyden?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "7/17/2014 1:47:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Reminder Ed Boyden", "body": "Today or tomorowb"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031320.txt_6142
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031320.txt
subject: Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hello Jeffrey — \nI hope all is well with you. As per Peggy Siegal's office, I have included here the invitation to the IFP Gotham Awards \nceremony, which will be held on Monday, November 27 at Cipriani Wall Street in New York City. \nThis year's ceremony is going to be another successful event. We couldn't be more thrilled with this year's impressive \ngroup of Tributees. The Actress Tribute will go to Nicole Kidman and the Actor Tribute to Dustin Hoffman. The \nDirector Tribute will be given to Sofia Coppola, with the Cinematographer Tribute going to Ed Lachman. With the \nIndustry Tribute, we will be honoring Jason Blum, founder of Blumhouse Productions. And we simply couldn't be more \npleased to honor Vice President Al Gore with this year's special Humanitarian Tribute. With nominees this year \nranging from Willem Dafoe, Adam Sandler and Robert Pattison to Margot Robbie, Lois Smith and Mary J. Blige, this \nyear's ceremony looks to be the most star studded ever. \nPlease let me know if you have any questions."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "November 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, 3:38 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Jeffrey — \n1). \nSounds good. Thanks so much for confirming. If you or someone in your office could provide the information below, I \ncan send along an invoice and contribution letter for your $10K donation toward the chairs. \nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable): \nCONTACT NAME: \nADDRESS LINE 1: \nADDRESS LINE 2: \nMany thanks."}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer"], "timestamp": "Nov 17, 2017, 11:19 AM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "The foundation that will be making this contribution is: \nGratitude America Ltd. \n6100 Red Hook Quarter, B3 \nSt Thomas, USVI 00802 \nplease send all correspondence including invoice to me via email"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Richard"], "timestamp": "Nov 17, 2017, 11:38 AM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Dear Richard, \nThanks so much for providing this information. I'm offsite today at \nthe ceremony venue, but I will be sure to send everything over to \nyou via email on Monday."}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer"], "timestamp": "Nov 20, 2017, 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "please send info tomorrow as i will be out the remainder of the week"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "November 20, 2017 at 8:48:00 PM EST", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Richard - \nI certainly will. But perhaps you can clarify something for me before I put all this together for the donation. \nJeffrey Epstein had asked to submit the letter and invoice to Peggy Siegal instead, and she had supplied \ndifferent information than below. \nPlease advice how best to proceed."}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Nov 21, 2017 8:29 AM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "is gratitude paying for IFP or peggy?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "11/21/2017 1:44:04 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "gratitude"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032491.txt_6143
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032491.txt
subject: Fwd: update
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 fevrier 2017 12:32", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "going to artists studio s much more appropriate , i think"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:49 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Gentlemen\nI hope you are having a great week.\nIn LA hoping to begin acquiring pieces: are we on?\nIf not yet, when please"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 fevrier 2017 18:40", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Feb 14, 2017, at 8:18 PM", "subject": "Re: TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\nLatest from JE (indeed, encouraging)\nPlease let me know when account/wire are active, and how I can access internet banking and start the ball (in fact, it has started)\nall the best"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "mercredi 15 fevrier 2017 13:00:07", "subject": "Re: TR: update", "body": "There is $1mm in the bank account. We can prepare checks or wires for you to sign upon request. This way book keeping gets done at same time. Just send back up with each request. How does that sound?"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "mercredi 15 fevrier 2017 18:15", "subject": "RE: TR: update", "body": "Thanks Darren\nGood news!\nI'm under the impression that checks will be exceptional (they are more cumbersome to handle), and we will use mostly wires.\nConsidering the time difference, my heavy travel and my own propension to do things at night and on week-ends I would much prefer having an internet code and be able to organize everything online when I need to.\nWhen I use Interaudi (my US bank), they can do that, store the recurring beneficiaries, and do wires in multiple currencies, but I am not familiar with DB.\nOf course, you could also have the same access and help me when needed.\nAlso, your point about bookkeeping is mitigated by the fact that, in any case, I will also need to have someone keeping track of the receipts and inventory, before shipping proofs to you. In any case there will be need for some work on my side before final filing is done.\nOn the other hand, if there is a \"checks and balances\" control issue, there could be a cap to my wiring powers (like the 10 K we discussed), that would be absolutely fine for me if this is the intent.\nPlease do let me know.\nWe can also talk about it (in Hawai now, free after 2 PM your time)\nIn any case, this is good and happy news. I'll review the first list of payments over the week-end."}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant <etienne.binant@example.com>", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 16, 2017 at 9:29:08 PM EST", "subject": "TR: TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\nI hope all is well\ncan you let me know if the below modus operandi works for you?\nall the best"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "2/17/2017 7:00:21 PM", "subject": "Fwd: update", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030097.txt_6157
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030097.txt
subject: Re: Kenya
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/19/2009 8:25:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Kenya", "body": "you will be amazed by the aroma"}, {"sender": "Peggy Sicgal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 3:24 AM", "subject": "Re: Kenya", "body": "We are sitting in the Amsterdam airport about to take off for Nair. Headed to Cottar's Camp in the Masai Mara....got Mattie in\ntow...she is dressed as a runaway in ripped jeans and a hoodie and sits on the floor of every airport repacking her knapsack. She is\nnow passed out, like the homeless. Will take photos and send.\n\nWe are going to photograph ourselves with the Masai in the mud huts and say we crashed the winter White house and are posing\nwith Obama's relatives. Miss you. Keep you posted.\n\nDid you see Sarah, the D on tv or speak to her?\n\nxoxo Peg\n\nDe ee ee ee ee ee ee i"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026674.txt_6158
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026674.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/22/2017 5:46:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Plus: my senior Chinese friends tell me the top gave Trump the go ahead to take on North Korea. \nNo idea if it's real."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "22 Apr 2017, at 18:23", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When can I call you ?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023272.txt_6175
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023272.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:25 PM", "subject": null, "body": "ahead today than my nov memo layed out = no real candidates. etc .. Ill redo the art partnership under new restrictions of course at no charge, and review the work done by tom/ joslin.\n\njoslin you and I should sit. you won't like it. AT ALL> he is afraid of telling you the story, as he belives brad is your guy and does not want to get fired. ada still refusing to share income tax opinions based on privilege , not under control at all. ? ? joslin said that murphy is not the cfo, as you told me but the coo. and the cfo is the same guy that reported to andrew, mistakes after mistakes not picked up by murphy who joslin described as a kind buffoon . he suggested a new ceo or coo who can make decisions. someone with some financail experience. he asked for a chief decision maker. 50 for year roll in money owed . 30 till july , most up front needed\n\nNov of 13 : I told youtom Eileen and Ralph were not up to the job, you disagreed very vocally and strongly , \" Ralph wrote the book, Tom has been doing it for 15 years and Eileen ran the trading desk at Morgan Stanley. \" Ada who had been working on all your documents for years while at the bank had been brought in- house but created more issues that didn't exist. and phaidon was its own animal\n\nDec 13. you were again annoyed that i said that they needed to be replaced and said \"1 was talking out of both sides of my mouth.\" first time ( email available)\n\nJan 14, you decided that no third year was necessary for my help. andi told you i thought that unwise and even suggested giving you an option at 40 m so there would be no tension\n\nMar 14, I told you that to do the job right , my team would need to do it. not yours it would not be inexpensive, but it would get done properly, you chose not to do itand said lets wait and see\n\nApril 14. We agreed to clean up various past mess.with the end of my work OCT 15th only then would i get paid.. urged JPM ( first of 14 reminders) GS and db accounts to be set up in order to bring your financial structure into the 21 century\n\nJuly 26 , I came to bens party, said new people needed to be hired, keep Eileen till end of year, and Ada till march, you suggested getting ada out earlier\n\noct structured the art partnership , but you wanted to wait until you fully understood ramifications formed the doc in dec to have it in 14,\n\nnov/ dec 14 I told you I considered my work complete separate from art partnership. gave list of things to do.\n\nthree months of you and your high school friend , trying to build a house with little of the relenavt experience. its silly . still no accurate numbers accounting , charts, etc\n\njan 15, I told you joslin cannot hire people, has not so for more than 5 years, former job in a public accounting firm.\n\napril 15 . no senior accountant even in the wings. joslin talking about reaching out to hire the only person he knew( worked in the past with dagazsitno ) and i interviewed 15 months ago. and rejected."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029221.txt_6178
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029221.txt
subject: Re: writing up proposal
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New <________>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:48 AM", "subject": "writing up proposal", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \n\nLarry has told me that you and a friend would like to contribute to my project (hallelujah and thank you a million times, Jeffrey) and that I ought to write up a proposal asking for 500,000. This is wonderful. If this comes to pass, the best way for that money to come, I think, is as a gift to Poetry in America, an initiative at EdLabs at Harvard University. This will give me discretion over its disbursement to HarvardX and WGBH, but this will be absolutely be a Harvard gift that will count as Campaign success and from which Harvard will take some (but not as much)overhead. . So far the best finance people I've met are at EdLabs and they are happy to manage these funds for me. There are other ways to give me this money that leave Harvard out, but my understanding is that your friend would like this to be a Harvard gift. \n\nHere's a draft of what I'd like to do with that money. \n\nI'd like 500,000 to do post-production and distribution of a whole historical period of American poetry (1914-1945 is what I'm thinking—Modernism) and including three episodes of tv. \n\nThe raw materials for that period include interviews with Bill Clinton (including footage not yet used by WGBH), Peter Gallison, Walter Isaacson, Lena Dunham, Woody Allen (whose lawyers didn't like our release a while ago, but we're hoping will soften over time), Harrison Ford (still a maybe), Robert Polito, Sarah Kay, Al Filreis, Rafael Campo, Susan Howe, kids from Nantucket High School, kids from Brookline High School, Alfre Woodard, Jane Pickering, Jay Parini, Ray Dalio, Leon Wieseltier, Richard Dawkins and others; and footage shot in Harlem, Greenwich Village, midtown, Chicago, London (if I have the money to hire a crew there; don't now ), at museums including the Fogg, Harvard Museum of Natural History, Frost's house in Ripton Vermont and more. \n\nThis allows the donor to give to a big Harvard Campaign priority, Teaching and Learning , by supporting Poetry in America, allowing me to produce the crucial segment of the online course with the highest (TV quality) production values and so also supplying higher quality video to WGBH as a way also to cut their costs. \n\nCurrently, HarvardX skimps (on lighting, for instance--see the Bill Clinton interview) and while WGBH ladles money raised by others into everything. I have been pounding away at my friends at WGBH and I know that WGBH producer will work with HarvardX if they can give him footage of the right quality. . That is, we'll use HarvardX as the backlot for WGBH so as to squeeze three episodes out for 250. \n\nThis proposal does not include experiments in schools or the curricular development into courses for teachers that you've seen in other (million dollar ) proposals. But the courses for teachers can't happen before the footage is developed, and these courses will have as their centerpiece the WGBH episodes, and so this funding will make all the rest possible. \n\nI can polish this narrative and or edit it, if there are things you think I have wrong. \n\nAnd I can attach a draft budget based on real Harvard numbers (what my Harvard video editor, producer, media manager cost) as well as a draft WGBH budget I'll now go an negotiate with them. Or we can do that at a second stage. \n\nLet me know what you think? And when are we reading Whitman together. Why don't we set a date for Feb when Poetry in America 3: Whitman is running online and we could screen a little video and then have a discussion around your table with you and some friends?\n\nLisa"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa Ne"], "timestamp": "10/27/2014 3:53:38 PM", "subject": "Re: writing up proposal", "body": "I think the proposal for 500k is optimistic but can't hurt. ."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030770.txt_6180
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030770.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-smear-c/"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Looks like I can't get away. But will be back in NYC on Sunday. Let me know when you're back too. I have a bad feeling about this new Woody round. It could pull him into the general Harvey pool of the despised and shunned. Clearly what Ronan and company are hoping for. I think Bannon may be right. This is not going to end until Trump goes down."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 4:52:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Strange time I have two more friends up to bat"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026106.txt_6184
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026106.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow I wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Call me now if u can"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 29, 2017 8:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You can come earlier if you like?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 29, 2017 at 8:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 7:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "can you call my cell"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/2/2017 11:22:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "At wake now. Is AM ok - what is #"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030764.txt_6185
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030764.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2/19/2017 10:17:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is best for you? no worry, I ve hardly had a moment. everyone in govt wanting an explanation of trump. SO MUCH FUN"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 10:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Sorry Jeff, had put my phone in a corner and didn t think you would come in the end \nHow long are you staying? I'm I'm Megeve with guests today \nI can come after any day after \nAriane de Rothschild"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "17 Feb 2017, at 21:28", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025134.txt_6187
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025134.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 105 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Summers <lhsummers@harvard.edu>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "Your pal should stay out of press.\n\nPublic link to manafort will be a disaster."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Summers <lhsummers@harvard.edu>"], "timestamp": "Friday, October 27, 2017 6:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "saudi?"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "Was there. Spoke well. Spent time w Softbank deputy Najeev or some such PIF guy too.\nFlying back.\n\nHow is life among the lucrative and louche?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:02 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "anyone stand out. . ? when we meet I will endeavor to mesmerize you with stories of\nD.C. so wild. !!!."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "War seems more likely than I used to think\n\nDjT is world s luckiest guy in terms of opposition, economy etc. still think his world will collapse.\n\nI’m trying to figure why American elite think if u murder your baby by beating and abandonment it must be\nirrelevant to your admission to Harvard, but hit on a few women 10 years ago and can’t work at a network\nor think tank. DO NOT REPEAT THIS INSIGHT"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023266.txt_6189
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023266.txt
subject: Valuation Discount
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "I ve have always given you my best advice, If you reflect on your financial life , you have been kept safe ,\nhad remarkable results and no disasters. I have repeatedly urged you to get rid of the people in your\noffice. , you have repeatedly chosen to ignore my advice , you told me last week that the emotional\nreason was in order to be weaned off my group and not have to pay my high fees. ( though ignoring\nthe benefit of between 1.5 and 2b to the better. ). and no explosions. | You have email after email\n,where i remind you that I am not your bookkeeper or accountant (in brads corporate speak his\" finance\ndebt ??!!) that it should be redone .I have reviewed a multitude of the silly reports given to you and\nhave pointed out the continued numerous inaccuracies. your question \" so what if the numbers are off ,\nso what if the categories are off. whats the big deal??. I suggest you de risk you finances and make the\ntough decisions necessary - pay the right amounts ( high) to get the work done properly or , you are , Im\nafraid, certain to get an unhappy answer.. tom will be back from vacation. this week."}, {"sender": "Halperin, Alan", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:16 PM", "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "I am attaching a draft response frong Empire Valuation as to why it arrived at a valuation discount on the\nlow end. Let’s discuss the response and next steps. Thanks. Alan"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spin", "Leon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:20 AM", "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "Yesterday , I again spent hours upon hours of my time with your office. ,( speak to brad to get\nflavor) and you and 1 will discuss the results in gory gruesome detail on Friday. it mirrored many other\nweeks spent doing the things that I don;t have the time to do.\n\nIn order to keep things in perspective, maybe reviewing an analogy I have used before with you,\n\nmight be helpful. You and your family are a 6 billion dollar corp. with an income between 250 -500\nmillion dollars per year. It contains a few operating biz's , a large wide array of existing investments,\nin various categories ,a desire to enter into others. A panoply of loans, notes. purchases, wide range\nof all types of taxes. , planes. boats homes. . trusts ,grats. a crazy number of bank accts. ( with no\noversight ) . law firms, acct firms, 800 page tax returns, foreign firms. art consultants.\nconstruction consultants bill payers, home mgmt.,vast multitude of Ilc's , including foreign, and with\nall that you only have a combined overhead of less that 3 million dollars.\n\nI have previously sent you the very same note that i have enclosed again below ,this time with\nhighlights . I wrote it to you over a year ago. As my acute disability ( selective memory) seems to\nhave been raised as one of your concerns , as aruleI try to memorialize things in writing in an\nattempt to lay out issues that I fear may later turn out to be a problem. ie what 1 would and wouldn't\ndo , - my responsibilities. ete and those things that are not. below you will find details of things that I\nthought needed to be done, so that you wouldn't find yourself in the very place where you currently\nfind yourself. however ,you chose to defer many of my suggestions- see below -,until only weeks ago.\n! you chose to defer the jpm acct. the art partnership on and on - into this year. and though the 60- 50"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032703.txt_6192
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032703.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it also includes barrack, saying not is only donald crazy but hes stupid. SO MCH FUN"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 2:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with mueller?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 2:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "As usual you nailed it....tomorrow will be an interesting day"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 8:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 3:37:00 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Call ne."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025652.txt_6194
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025652.txt
subject: an article you may both hate. or like.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss <lkrauss@asu.edu>", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky <noam@gmail.com>", "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM", "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "hope all is well.\n\nhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Thanks for sending. A wide area of agreement, but not total.\n\nOn confronting dogma, I of course agree — though in my opinion the secular religions — nationalist fanaticism, etc. —\nare much more dangerous. And if some find rational discussion offensive — as, for example, mainstream academics\nfind dismantling myths of “American exceptionalism” or “Israeli self-defense” or Obama’s mass murder campaign,\netc., offensive — so be it.\n\nBut I don’t see why that should extend to ridicule. That includes astrologists. Astronomers can refute astrology,\nwhile recognizing that perfectly honest and deluded people may believe it and should be treated with respect, while\ntheir beliefs are confronted with evidence. I also don’t see why we should ridicule religious dogma, just as I don’t\nthink we should ridicule the much more pernicious secular dogmas. Rather, we should respond to irrational belief\nwith argument and evidence, while recognizing that their advocates (like most of the intellectual world in the case of\nsecular dogma) are people who we should be responding to but without ridiculing them. It may be hard\n\nsometimes. For example, when the icon and founding father of sober non-sentimental Realism in International\nAffairs informs us that the US, unlike other countries, has a “transcendental purpose,” and the fact that it constantly\nacts in contradiction to its purpose doesn’t matter because the facts are just “abuse of history” while real history is\n“the evidence of history as our minds reflect it,” then it’s hard to avoid ridicule. But we should. There’s no point\nridiculing virtually the entire IR profession and the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads\nto major human disasters.\n\nOn Davis, I frankly think that’s a non-issue. If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions of employment\nrequire (including following the law), then she can quit and look for another job. As in any other such case.\n\nNoam"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "I think religion plays a major positive role in many lives. . i dont like fanaticism on either side. . sorry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030002.txt_6199
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030002.txt
subject: Re: ICYMI
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Reid Hoffman"], "timestamp": "7/5/2015 9:30:29 PM", "subject": "Re: ICYMI", "body": "heyy it looks like your diet program has worked"}, {"sender": "Reid Hoffman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:03 AM", "subject": "ICYMI", "body": "My occasional roundup of interesting links and writing I've shared — in case you missed them. :)\n\nNew and Notable\n• We are thrilled to welcome Sarah Tavel to Greylock Partners. LINK\n• And also very excited to welcome lynda.com to the LinkedIn team! LINK\n• Change.org celebrates its 100 million users milestone. Emily Chang discuss this and more with CEO Ben Rattray on Bloomberg West: LINK\n• Byron Auguste launched Opportunity@Work, a new civic enterprise aimed at \"rewiring the U.S. labor market.\" Tom Friedman's post: LINK\n• Mimi Ito launched Connected Camps, a summer online coding camp using Minecraft. LINK\n\nWorthwhile Reads\n• Jeff Weiner: How Linkedln is Helping Power the President's Tech Jobs Initiative LINK\n• The New Yorker: RU There? - Nancy Lublin and Crisis Text Line LINK\n• Fast Company: Inside Obama's Stealth Startup LINK\n• Jerry Chen: The Age of Developer-Defined Infrastructure LINK\n• Sheryl Sandberg's powerful tribute to Dave Goldberg. LINK\n\nSome of My Recent Essays\n• Wired: Why the block chain matters LINK\n• Financial Times: Acquiring proven entrepreneurs is a smart way to innovate LINK\n• Press Start to Continue: One More Role of Founders LINK\n\nTo Watch\n• My conversation with Peter Thiel at CEIBS LINK\n• I enjoyed participating in this fun video by Founders Forum imagining what life would be like for tech entrepreneurs if the World Wide Web had never been invented. LINK\n\nInterviews\n• Vox: My discussion with Ezra Klein on the biggest lie employers tell employees LINK\n• Entrepreneur: Why I'm betting big on Bitcoin LINK\n• HuffPo: My discussion with Dawn Nakagawa in advance of the World Post conference LINK"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029553.txt_6201
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029553.txt
subject: Re: Keating Interview
messages:
  [{"sender": "Katherine Keating <katherine.keating@unknown>", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/28/2011 12:36 AM", "subject": "Re: Keating Interview", "body": "Paul Keating explains as never before"}, {"sender": "jeffrey epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Katherine Keating"], "timestamp": "10/28/2011 12:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Keating Interview", "body": "Are you here\n\nSorry for all the typos. Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Katherine Keating", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/28/2011 4:33:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Keating Interview", "body": "Yes. Just arrived back from San Fran."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032446.txt_6208
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032446.txt
subject: Re: Kuhn
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert L. Kuhn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Jan 11, 2017, at 2:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Dear Jeffrey:\nAttached, as promised, is our proposal for Closer To Truth to produce the definitive television series on \"The Science of Sleep and Dreams\" - 13 episodes, a full season, on —200 PBS stations, plus extensive web videos. Contemporary advances in sleep/dream research makes timing propitious.\nThree documents:\n1) Proposal (12 pages)\n2) Budget (line item)\n3) Schedule (weekly)\nPlease confirm receipt.\nI'll be in New York from January 19 until about February 8. Love to meet - on Sleep/Dreams and all sorts of fun stuff to cheer our 2017.\nRobert"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Just got to New York - love to meet, brainstorm.\nFrom Washington, my inauguration-day commentary and conversation with Chinese experts on Sino-US relations under Trump - https://youtu.be/OGdulpmeVNM?list=PLt-M8o1W GdSZbSuplmsSS5JZzlhIWpGb\nEarlier interview on BBC \"What Chinese think of Trump\" - two minute excerpt\n- http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04m9b4\nLooking forward, Robert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Jan 22, 2017, at 4:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "look forward to it"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/25/2017 7:26:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "When's good to meet?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032236.txt_6210
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032236.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon Po", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/10/2016 7:13:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Actually I don't think he/voters would care. Being effectively shameless is a pretty powerful weapon\n\nfor a presidential candidate.\n\nhttp://www.vox.com/2016/2/10/10956978/donald-trump-terrifying"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Wow"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Lando", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 10 February 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Its getting scary. The stories you could tell..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033390.txt_6215
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033390.txt
subject: Re: Maybe you can answer this question...
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas"], "timestamp": "5/11/2018 8:31:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Maybe you can answer this question...", "body": "nixon adage-- follow the.."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Maybe you can answer this question...", "body": "https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/05/11/alan-dershowitz-donald-trump-what-happened-218359\n\nLandon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times\n\nhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon%20jr%20thomas/index.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030957.txt_6230
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030957.txt
subject: Re: Trump Is Said to Know of Stormy Daniels Payment Months Before He Denied It - The New York Times
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, May 4, 2018 at 10:09 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump Is Said to Know of Stormy Daniels Payment Months Before He Denied It - The New York Times", "body": "https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/politics/trump-hush-payment-stormy-daniels.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, May 5, 2018 at 1:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump Is Said to Know of Stormy Daniels Payment Months Before He Denied It - The New York Times", "body": "Good catch and yes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "5/5/2018 10:07:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump Is Said to Know of Stormy Daniels Payment Months Before He Denied It - The New York Times", "body": "Once you know the code it's all clear"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031491.txt_6231
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031491.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/10/2016 12:45:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got it. \nNow remember \nPress is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 9, 2016, at 8:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no, im out of it. donald brought out four women that said bill abused them. / they wilil feature in the hillary \nsays you should give the benefit of the doubt to victims. I laid this out for you over dinner, its \ndisgraceful, but. here we are"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032320.txt_6232
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032320.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 29, 2016, at 2:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/31/technology/peter-thiel-defends-his-most-contrarian-move-yet-supporting-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/29/2016 9:04:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Peter is looking smarter each day... \nHeading to Lynn wake tonight. \nI believe Lesley Bella Bebe went this afternoon."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032334.txt_6237
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032334.txt
subject: Re: told you
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/5/2016 11:56:17 AM", "subject": "Re: told you", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\nSent from my iPad"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["CourtMail@nysd.uscourts.gov"], "timestamp": "Friday, November 04, 2016 5:59 PM", "subject": "Activity in Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Doe v. Trump et al Notice of Voluntary Dismissal", "body": "This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.\n\n***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.\n\nU.S. District Court\nSouthern District of New York\n\nNotice of Electronic Filing\nThe following transaction was entered by Meagher, Thomas on 11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT and filed on 11/4/2016\nCase Name: Doe v. Trump et al\nCase Number: 1:16-cv-07673-RA\nFiler: Jane Doe\nDocument Number: 15\nDocket Text:\nNOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Jane Doe. (Meagher, Thomas)\n\n1:16-cv-07673-RA Notice has been electronically mailed to:"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023299.txt_6240
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023299.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella", "Leon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:20 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Yesterday , | again spent hours upon hours of my time with your office. ,( speak to brad to get flavor) and you and i will discuss the results in gory gruesome detail on Friday. it mirrored many other weeks spent doing the things that I don;t have the time to do.\n\nIn order to keep things in perspective, maybe reviewing an analogy I have used before with you, might be helpful. You and your family are a 6 billion dollar corp. with an income between 250 -500 million dollars per year. It contains a few operating biz's , a large wide array of existing investments, in various categories ,\n\na desire to enter into others. A panoply of loans, notes. purchases, wide range of all types of taxes. _, planes.\nboats homes. . trusts ,grats. a crazy number of bank accts. ( with no oversight ) . law firms, acct firms, 800\npage tax returns, foreign firms. art consultants. construction consultants bill payers,\nhome mgmt.,vast multitude of Ilc's , including foreign, and with all that you only have a combined overhead\nof less that 3. million dollars.\n\nI have previously sent you the very same note that i have enclosed again below ,this time with highlights\n\n. I wrote itto you over a year ago. As my acute disability ( selective memory) seems to have been raised\nas one of your concerns , asa rule I try to memorialize things in writing in an attempt to lay out issues that I\nfear may later turn out to be a problem. ie what i would and wouldn't do , - my responsibilities. ete and those\nthings that are not. below you will find details of things that I thought needed to be done, so that you\nwouldn't find yourself in the very place where you currently find yourself. however ,you chose to defer\nmany of my suggestions- see below -,until only weeks ago. ! you chose to defer the jpm acct. the art\npartnership on and on - into this year. and though the 60- 50 40 timber emails all carried with it a clear warning\nthat you needed to do something re personnel if it were to stabilize,- you chose to wait.\n\nONE YEAR AGO\nFeb 17 2014 i wrote:\n\nWith regard the more pressing issue I am uncertain of just how to proceed. I am torn, as my very strong\ninclination is not to be involved at all. It is extremely time consuming, delicate, fraught with many pitfall many\nthat will make you very upset and a major pain in the ass. I wrote you months ago that the quality of the people\ninvolved need to be upgraded. ( lucky for me these last issues arose way before the beginning of my\ninvolvement ) Iam also aware however of my overarching friendship obligations of ok, -given all the\ncomplexities who else can do it? problem.\n\nYour family office needs a daddy. children with good intentions are running around , sniping , nitpicking with"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:16 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "will continue to say so , and you obviously decide. but I will reiterrate even in the face of your \"nobody is\ngood enough argument.\" keeping foremost in my mind that you and I have only beeen shown a very tiny\nhandful of people. 4. I find the friction over fees , counterproductive. in an attempt to avoid it I had\nsuggested a multi year deal early on. you rejected it. I then suggested, and urged you to have an option at a\nfixed fee , you also rejected that .you wanted the fee payment only at the end I argued but ,conceded. I\nsuggested a structure that tom didn't like. you rejected it. 5 I suggest you make a fair proposal.- that 1 can\neither accept or reject. some payment up front this time is a requirement. I am willing to modify any outstanding\nobligations. - there are creative ways to assure you of your desired characterization of those payments. 6 you\nshould open accts at Deutsh . and goldman. I am told that eilleen has set up over one hundred bank acccts for\nyou???!!. few relevant 7 you should immediatly demand a list of all her acct authorites , exec poistions\n\n. director etc. bank authorizsations. etc. talk later or over the weekend if you like\n\nkkkyjkjjjkjjyou said"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032924.txt_6242
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032924.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you are always welcome. if you would like to visit caribean , ican organize. anytime with wife your\ncall. otherwise new york dec.6-9?  \\\n\ninteresting times. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-\nuse-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016 at 11:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Darn. On a cruise in the aforementioned Caribbean that week. Weekly Standard post-election\ncruise. Bad timing on our part.\n\nWe'll try for January-February in warm climate, or NY when you're next there.\nMany thanks."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you going to stop in st thomas on your cruise?"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 19, 2016 at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Greetings! Just got my hands on the itinerary. Alas, no St. Thomas. Back to the drawing board.\n\nHope you're well. Best, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 19, 2016 at 7:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hope thanksgiving is peaceful . miss talking to you"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 19, 2016 at 11:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And to you as well. We'll be at the Breakers en famille as of Tuesday evening.. Any chance to see you in\nthe Sunshine State?\n\nHugs, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 19, 2016 at 11:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I'll be there wed"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 20, 2016 at 2:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fabulous! May I buy you lunch?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "11/20/2016 6:53:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "great great anytime at your convenience or you can come to the house ,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033384.txt_6244
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033384.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 25, 2011 8:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "donald attnny?"}, {"sender": "Jack Goldberger", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 25, 2011 9:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Looking for his name. haven't located yet"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 25, 2011 9:36 am", "subject": "Re:", "body": "was it Rampell."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/25/2011 3:00:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Paul Rampell does act as Donald Trump's attorney for some personal, real estate and Town of PB matters. James Green\nof WPB also does work for Trump (like the American flag matter) usually through Rampell. I think another firm was doing\nthe airport flight path and expansion matter."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022839.txt_6246
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022839.txt
subject: Re: How are you holding up?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "1/16/2015 7:52:31 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "it is the begining world currencies are out of balance. brazil, etc"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "I think the big issue is separating yourself from Andrew. I mean I can see why a statement might help in some way -- but its Andrew (not clinton and the rest) that is keeping the story alive. Until you are able to come forward and address that the story lives on. I mean in the end he had consensual sex with And {worked for you. The rest is atmospherics. You have moved on! People don't know that and cant accept that unless you say as much.\n\nDoes franc drama worry you? Am writing on it now..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "very well, my reputation has admittedly taken a hit. however, again, more calls re currency than i can handle. in addition I am considering a statement and positon that Out of respect and love for my former girlfrend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never questioned , or subpeonaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her name. however during the entire [I time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere. each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers J “She never saw anything that {J claims. She can confirm 1. Iwas never alone at the house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained , not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2 , were local strippers, that would call all the time asking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship , I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. .7 She woudl acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. (no sex _).. they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, ..8 . J answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to 60."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025875.txt_6248
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025875.txt
subject: fact checking questions for New York Magazine story
messages:
  [{"sender": "Alex Yablon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 31 2015 03:23 PM", "subject": "fact checking questions for New York Magazine story", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nSorry for the phone tag. In case it's easier to respond by email, I have put my questions below. I'm at my desk and should be here until 5, and should be free on my cell phone after 6:30.\n\nBest,\n\nAlex\n\n-what is the square footage of your Manhattan home?\n\n-do you work on alaptop from your dining room, with a large white board for notes and several pairs of reading glasses close at hand? Is the dining room windowless?\n\n-do paparazzi often camp outside your home?\n\n-did Michael once visit on the same day as a head of state who'd had a police escort?\n\n-did you tell Michael about a dinner you'd hosted for six tech entrepreneurs who had a combined worth of several hundred billion dollars? When was this meal?\n\n-Do you believe that there are now more people who possess Roosevelt or Carnegie-levels of wealth, the sort that can rival governments in influence? That these people face unusual challenges when entering philanthropy due to the sheer size of their fortunes? That the rich may know the business that made them rich, but not money itself?\n\n-are you interested in what will happen to the $4.2 trillion possessed by the super-rich in 40-odd years once they have mostly died?\n\n-Do you believe no superrich people want to give their entire fortunes to their children for fear of how it might affect them?\n\n-do you advise the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on how to convince other billionaires to join their initiatives?\n\n-did you volunteer to invest $20 million dollars in Michael's attempt to buy New York Magazine in 2004?\n\n-do you believe the recent claims about Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew in relation to you are \"ludicrous\" ?\n\n-When you met Michael for lunch in the West Village, was it the first time in 10 years you'd gone to lunch at a restaurant?\n\n-Do you have a support staff of young women in their 20s and 30s? Have some of them worked for you for many years, through their own marriages and as they raise families? Have any of these employees been romantically involved with you? When Michael came to your home, had one of these women recently gone on an around the world honeymoon, which you arranged? Do they often travel with you to your other homes — in New Mexico, Paris, Palm Beach, and in the Caribbean? Do you maintain there is no quid-pro-quo in the relationships with these women? Do these women often socialize with the policy makers and businessmen with whom you often meet?\n\n-Is your current girlfriend a dental student you met four years ago at a dinner party in New York?\n\n-Did you date Eva Andersson Dubin? Have you known her for 30 years? Did you pay for her to go to medical school?\n\n-when you take meetings in your Manhattan dining room, do you take your guests out to a Sabrett hot dog cart? Will the women who work for you accompany you?\n\n-Did you invite Michael to sit inon a presentation by a group of quants? Are you looking for a group of quants who have developed promising investing algorithms, and do you plan to invest $5 million with each?\n\n-during U.N. Week in late September, did you host a Sunday night discussion with Bill Gates, Mort Zuckerman, and Peter Thiel? Was anyone else in attendance? Were you discussing a possible Gates Foundation donor advised fund?\n\n-Did you host Sheikh Hamad Bin Jassim and several others from Qatar? Do you know if the Sheikh has ahome across the street from you in Manhattan? Did they talk to you about bribery compromising their bid for the World Cup? When was this? Did they bring a gift of chocolate made with pistachios grown on the Sheikh's farm?\n\n-The morning after the Qataris came over, did you have a9 AM breakfast with the attorney Reid Weingarten? Did you discuss his defense of CT governor John Rowland, the Qatari visit, and who controls ISIS? Did Weingarten believe Turkey was using ISIS as a proxy against the Kurds?\n\n-After this, did you meet with Brock Pierce to discuss bitcoin? Did Larry Summers join this meeting?\n\n-That evening, did you host Australian PM Kevin Rudd and Thorborn Jagland for a cocktail party? Did Jagland critique US foreign policy? Did you offer to fly him back to Europe on your jet?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026935.txt_6249
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026935.txt
subject: Trump's ex-lawyer Michael Cohen will testify at House Oversight Committee before entering prison
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn [i", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2019 8:23:40 PM", "subject": "Trump's ex-lawyer Michael Cohen will testify at House Oversight Committee before entering prison", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/10/ex-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-to-testify-to-house-oversight-committee.html\n\nImportance: High"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032222.txt_6250
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032222.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemm|er", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/27/2015 1:28:50 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Trump is living proof of the adage that it is better to be lucky than smart."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029505.txt_6261
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029505.txt
subject: Middle Eastern Monarchs Look at the Trumps and See Themselves — Foreign Policy
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/28/2018 10:56:02 PM", "subject": "Middle Eastern Monarchs Look at the Trumps and See Themselves — Foreign Policy", "body": "http://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/28/middle-eastern-monarchs-look-at-the-trumps-and-see-themselves/amp/\n\nMiddle Eastern Monarchs Look at the\nTrumps and See Themselves\n\nAmerica's Arab allies have always wanted to buy direct access\nto U.S. foreign policy, and they finally found a seller.\nMay 28, 2018\n\nIvanka Trump andJared Kushner at the presentation of the Order of Abdulaziz al-Saud\nmedal at the Saudi Royal Court in Riyadh on May 20, 2017..MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty\nImages)\n\nAlmost 20 years ago when I was a graduate student living in Cairo, I published an article in\na Washington-based journal called Middle East Insight. The magazine had a solid\nreputation, with a knack for scoring interviews with important people. (In the same edition\nas my piece, titled “Egypt’s Next Generation,” there was an interview with Gamal Mubarak,\nson of long-term Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, who had already begun his rise —\nthough not yet his eventual fall — as heir apparent.) A few years later, Middle East Insight\ndisappeared. When I heard the news, I figured the magazine was too niche for an expanding\nmedia environment, shrugged my shoulders, and went on with life.\n\nI hadn’t thought about Middle East Insight until its onetime publisher, George Nader,\nrecently exploded into the news as an international man of mystery at the center of an\napparent attempt to covertly influence the outcome of the last American presidential\nelection. It seems that in the span of not quite two decades, the guy who ran a small, likely\nnot profitable, but influential policy magazine become a conduit between Crown Prince\nMohammed bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan of the Abu Dhabi, Saudi Crown Prince\nMohammed bin Salman, and Donald Trump’s closest inner circle, both after, and —\ncrucially for special counsel Robert Mueller’s ongoing criminal investigation — before\nTrump’s election as U.S. president."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019321.txt_6268
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019321.txt
subject: Re: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 01:51:58 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "9th circle"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:58 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Hicks?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 02:02:16 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "If you are going to play here , you'll have to spend time, europe by remote doesn't work . Lots and lots of face time and hand holding"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 6:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "its doable , but time consuming, there are many leaders of countries we can organize for you to have one on ones. however. you will have to come , stay 8 -10 days. , then no more than two weeks later. the same. The fear is that you gin up their hopes and emotions and then abandon them. I think you want to be an insider, not an outsider flying in and out. did you get the first cut of american carnage?.?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Agree 100%\nHow do I do that???\nAmerican Carnage amazing -- An Emmanual financed it and he loves it---Erolls besties tell him it will end his career because he gave a platform to a monster\nOfficially in Venice, Toronto and New York Film Festival\nSkipping telluride"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 9:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "We can talk about at your convenience"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "7/23/2018 1:50:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032918.txt_6274
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032918.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "any new york plans"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thanks for checking in. I'll make some. What timing would work for you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you are always welcome. if you would like to visit caribean , ican organize. anytime with wife your call. otherwise new york dec.6-9? interesting times. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Darn. Ona cruise in the aforementioned Caribbean that week. Weekly Standard post-election cruise. Bad timing on our part.\n\nWe'll try for January-February in warm climate, or NY when you're next there.\nMany thanks."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you going to stop in st thomas on your cruise?"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Greetings! Just got my hands on the itinerary. Alas, no St. Thomas. Back to the drawing board.\nHope you're well. Best, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "11/20/2016 1:48:58 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hope thanksgiving is peaceful . miss talking to you"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033016.txt_6277
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033016.txt
subject: Re: I look forward to hearing from you
messages:
  [{"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:11 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\ncan you please tell me about your interest in the vagus nerve? Why is the vagus nerve important to you? Perhaps you can refer me to web site where I can learn more about your take on it.\n\nbest wishes,\nStanley"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Stanley Rosenberg"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 25, 2017 3:22 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/private-donor-helps-fund-scientists-after-trumps-proposed us 599f532ae4b0dOef9f1c129d\n\nPrivate Donor Helps Fund Scientists After\nTrump's Proposed \"Anti-Science\" Budget\nCuts\nwww.huffingtonpost.com\nThe famous American Astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson, once\nsaid, \"The good thing about science is that it's true, whether or\nnot you believe in ..."}, {"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg < >", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 2:56 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "What nice coverage in the Huffington Post.\n\nLiving in Europe, I was not aware that Trump's proposed cuts will be so devastating to the scientific\ncommunity.\n\nYou asked me if I would be in New York September 18. Did you have something in mind?\nI am 77 and do not travel so well. I have cut back on my plans to travel. I can consider coming to New York,\nSeptember has anything to do specifically with the vagus nerve - and if it cannot be done with a conference\ncall on Skype.\nI will be able to stop in NYC on a future trip.\n\nLinda Stone was the person who I met with years ago. It was Linda who suggested that I contact you.\n\nbest wishes,\nStanley"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "25 Aug 2017, at 09.49", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "I recall. Let's skype or phone"}, {"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg < >", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:13 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "I am free today after 8 o'clock a. m. EST until 3 p.)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Stanley Rosenberg"], "timestamp": "8/25/2017 12:11:54 PM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "now?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032308.txt_6280
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032308.txt
subject: Since you are super well connected...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Gianni Serazzi", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/9/2016 5:53:22 AM", "subject": "Since you are super well connected...", "body": "A small point on the election that maybe you think might have some value for HC \n1-In Europe a LOT of citizens start becoming very angry and voting for populist parties \n2-A major reason is that the interconnected world shows them every minute on their smartphones how rich \npeople are living and envy sets in (especially with raising inequality that is perfectly normal when financial \nreturns of rich people are exponential and work returns are linear) \n3-They want change and risk electing completely wrong people (Italy 5stelle, France LePen might be next, \nHungary, Greece already lost, Brexit and anti-trade another example) \n4-US election is over, Trump has destroyed himself as expected (I was in Wharton with Donald Jr, 3.95GPA vs. \n2.5 GPA but he thought he was a god... what a family) \nthe message: \n5-Maybe HC can use the last debates to create weapons for change. She could acknowledge that she \nunderstands that people want change, and ask for a clear majority in the senate thinking abou that instead of \npresidential elections. Then if she does bad in 4 years she is out, but she could make the public understand that \nsenate is key to show what a president can do. \nBut again, I know 0.001% of what you or them understands about politics, I am however worried that europe is \njust 5 or 10 years ahead on this trend compared to the US in anti-establishment feelings and I have seen with \nfriends how irrational and influenceable masses can become in voting when they are frustrated (Hitler was \nelected after all...) \nHope to see you soon!!!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029277.txt_6281
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029277.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS <lhs@lawrencesummers.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Jeff\n\nHow plausible is idea that trump is real cocaine user?\nL"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS <lhs@lawrencesummers.com>"], "timestamp": "On Oct 2, 2016, at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "can somoene from the development office show rothschild around harvard sat.?"}, {"sender": "LHS <>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "On Sunday, 2 October 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes. Let's briefly discuss. Can u have her write me."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS <>"], "timestamp": "On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "LHS ~~ 0 i sss—‘“isSCSsS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "On Sunday, 2 October 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "What number r u at?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["1S"], "timestamp": "10/2/2016 9:00:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029590.txt_6282
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029590.txt
subject: Re: invitation
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New <lisanew@harvard.edu>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed.\nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to\nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next time\nyou're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar themes to\nLolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young girl.\nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \"bootleg\"\nepisode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me and you were\nso kind to make it happen.\nLisa"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/25/2018 11:30:39 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey,\nHow's this"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028856.txt_6285
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028856.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional, emotional. and financial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "\"girls?„ careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any.....also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im on for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me... .just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "train? yes , i will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" well' -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/19/2014 6:57:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022805.txt_6295
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022805.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon (iii", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/7/2017 2:26:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iam more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/ the same boies that represents || who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and clinton - boies clients. he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and though she gave details of a dinnner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife.\n\nboies is going to be in the firiing line. from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG, , his fees were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as an insurance co. -- ... phone only"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032529.txt_6301
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032529.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, May 6, 2017 at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if you and or your uncle want to come to visit after art shopping to talk more about trump middle east trip at the end of the month, let me know, thx great fun today"}, {"sender": "Jabor Y. ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/6/2017 7:02:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "We still have not finished our tour yet. If we are left with any energy will try to pass by. If not next time. I'll call you if we are coming."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012666.txt_6308
source_file: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012666.txt
subject: Fw: Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Oosterbaan, Andrew", "recipients": ["Oosterbaan, Andrew"], "timestamp": "02/27/2008 09:45 PM", "subject": "Fw: Epstein", "body": "Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Sloman", "recipients": ["Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)"], "timestamp": "Wed Feb 27 21:37:02 2008", "subject": "Epstein", "body": "Jay,\n\nYou have renewed your request for certain information which this Office does not generally make available in similar pre-indictment situations. After carefully considering your request, I have decided, in my capacity as the First Assistant U.S. Attorney, not to make an exception here.\n\nRegarding the Landon Thomas matter, Mr. Thomas was given, pursuant to his request, non-case specific information concerning specific federal statutes.\n\nRegarding the offer to extend the current deadline of March 3, 2008 contained in my February 25th email. That offer was based on counsel for Mr. Epstein meeting with CEOS the week of March 3rd. You indicate that you are unavailable. It is hard to imagine that some or all of the other attorneys representing Mr. Epstein cannot serve this function. After all, Mr. Epstein is also represented by Dean Kenneth Starr, Martin Weinberg, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz, Lily Ann Sanchez, and Guy Lewis.\n\nThat being said, the Southern District of Florida will only renew the offer to extend the current deadline if you and the CEOS Section Chief mutually agree on a timetable by close of business on Friday, February 29, 2008 to meet and complete presentations no later than March 19, 2008. Given that CEOS is ready to proceed immediately, this seems like more than ample time. As I indicated in my previous email, if CEOS subsequently decides that a federal prosecution should not be undertaken against Mr. Epstein, this Office will close its investigation. However, should CEOS disagree with Mr. Epstein’s position, Mr. Epstein shall have one week to abide by the terms and conditions of the September 24, 2007 Agreement as amended by letter from United States Attorney Acosta."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027032.txt_6310
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027032.txt
subject: Fwd: Summers withdraws from Fed race
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2013 11:12:33 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Summers withdraws from Fed race", "body": "A major blow to a friend. Lest BO takes him to replace JL. \nNow he'll probably be free in the next few days. EB"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029779.txt_6316
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029779.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/14/2013 8:47:12 PM", "subject": null, "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032687.txt_6317
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032687.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 6:08:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I know -- have been reading it. Good old MW. You still talk to him?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031136.txt_6318
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031136.txt
subject: FW: Warning: The smart money is fleeing U.S. stocks
messages:
  [{"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/18/2016 5:45:03 PM", "subject": "FW: Warning: The smart money is fleeing U.S. stocks", "body": "May 18, 2016 \nWarning: The Smart Money \nIs Fleeing U.S. Stocks \nBY BILL BONNER, CHAIRMAN, BONNER & PARTNERS \nDUBLIN — The Dow dropped 180 points yesterday — or \nabout 1%. \nAnd another clever billionaire says he is looking elsewhere \nfor profits. Reuters: \nActivist investor Carl Icahn on Monday said there was a chance the stock \nmarket could suffer a big decline, saying valuations are rich and earnings at \nmany companies are fueled more by low borrowing costs than management's \nefforts to boost results. \n\"I am very cautious on equities today. This market could easily have a big \ndrop,\" Icahn said. \nYes, dear reader, the smart money is getting out of U.S. stocks. And here's our \nold friend Rob Marstrand explaining why: \nRight now, every measure that analyzes the S&P 500 says it's expensive. Prices \nare high relative to earnings, net assets, sales, and cash flow. \nWhat's more, there's plenty of evidence that the main thing propping up the \nstock prices is heavy buying by the companies themselves [via share \nrepurchases]. \nAnd now, that prop is getting kicked out from under the stock market. \nBloomberg: \nAfter snapping up trillions of dollars of their own stock in a five-year \nshopping binge that dwarfed every other buyer, U.S. companies from Apple \nInc. to IBM Corp. just put on the brakes. \nAnnounced repurchases dropped 38% to $244 billion in the last four months, \nthe biggest decline since 2009... \nRecommended Links \nRickards: \"Warning, I've Changed My Thesis On Gold\" \nI firmly believe we're at the beginning of the BIGGEST move the world \nhas ever seen in gold. \"Simple math\" says $10,000 gold is all but certain. But, you're \nnot going to believe what I have to say next... BEFORE you buy a single ounce of \ngold, read this important message. \nLast Chance: VIP Access To Doug Casey's Shocking 2016 \nForecast \nCasey fears a severe crisis is brewing. Not a currency collapse or stock market crash. \nA specific threat that could wreak more havoc than the Great Depression. That's why \ntomorrow, in an urgent broadcast event, Doug's pulling back the curtain on his \nshocking warning. And revealing how to profit from it in the months ahead, in a big \nway. Last chance to get VIP access ends tonight. Click here now for full details. \nPareto's \"Foxes\" \nAlthough the bull market in U.S. stocks is probably near its end, the bull \nmarket in the Deep State shows no sign of weakening. \nYear after year, the power of the \"foxes\" grows. \nIt was the great Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto who noticed — among other \nthings — that no matter what kind of government you think you have, there are \nalways some crafty insiders, the \"foxes,\" who take control of it. \nPolicies are set, programs are started... decisions are made... with no consent \nof the people or their elected officials; the foxes work the angles. \nOver time, the forces of law and order become more and more corrupt.., as the \nfoxes bend the entire system to do their bidding. \nWars are started with no plan or intention to win them. Money is handed out \nfor no better reason than this: They can get away with it. \nAnd best of all, most people are none the wiser; they believe the myths... and \nattack anyone who challenges them. \nRip-Off \nPerhaps the biggest rip-off of all time has taken place over the last eight years \n— and in plain sight of everybody. \nVia the magic of ultra-low rates, the Fed — a nest for the wiliest and most \ncunning of the foxes — took roughly $8 trillion out of the pockets of savers and \nretirees and handed it to borrowers. \nWho is the world's biggest borrower? \nYes... it's the Deep State itself. \nThe Fed claimed to be helping to \"stimulate\" the economy. But you can't really \nstimulate an economy by stealing from the people who produce wealth and \nprovide it with capital. \nNot surprisingly, growth has stalled. Wages have fallen. Productivity has \nstagnated. \nFor 95% of the male population, real earnings are lower today than they were \nin 1973. \nIs there any wonder many of these men vote for Donald Trump — a \"strong \nman\" who promises to do something about it? \nBut the top 5% — where the foxes are — gained income. Their wages are up \nmore than 50% over the same time. \nWhy? \nBecause they take more and more money from the rest of us. \nMore tomorrow... on a new Rebellion in Gualfin... and a measure of how big \nthe Deep State has become... \nRegards, \nBill \nFurther Reading: The Deep State already controls just about every aspect of \nAmerican life. From health care to education to the food on our tables to the \nnever-ending war on terror, this cadre of cronies is pulling the strings. \nIn his latest online presentation, Bill exposes how the Deep State has now \npushed the world to the brink of an irreversible disaster. Learn more here as \nhe reveals how it will all unfold... and, more importantly, how it'll change your \nlife forever. \nMarket Insight \nBY CHRIS LOWE, EDITOR AT LARGE \nGeorge Soros is betting big on gold. \nAs Bill reported yesterday, the billionaire speculator cut his  \nfirm's investments in U.S. stocks by more than one-third. \nSoros has also disclosed a new stake in the world's biggest \ngold miner, Barrick Gold (ABX). \nSoros Fund Management, his investment vehicle, bought a 1.7% of Barrick. \nThis makes it Soros' biggest listed holding. \nAs today's chart shows, Barrick has skyrocketed so far in 2016. \nThe company's stock is up a jaw-dropping 156% year to date. \nRecommended Links \nRead this BEFORE you buy gold or gold stocks \nDr. Steve Sjuggerud Reports: Most investors don't know this, but \nthere s a \"Magic Number\" that appears before EVERY big move in gold and EVERY \nbig move in gold stocks. What is it and is now the time to buy? Details here... \nFeatured Reads \nGold Price to Soar More Than 650%?  \nOne currencies expert says a \"super spike\" in gold prices is headed our way. \nHere, he explains what will cause it and, more importantly, how you can \nposition yourself to profit. \nShare Buybacks Fall Most Since 2009  \nU.S. share buybacks have fallen back to levels last seen in 2099. The news \ncomes amid the worst profit slump since the financial crisis.., and when \nvaluations sit near 14-year highs. \nWhy \"Money Helicopters\" Are Not the Answer  \nAlthough \"helicopter money\" — code for handing out free money — is now \nbeing seriously discussed... what's really needed to boost growth are major \nstructural reforms. The fate of the world depends on it. \nRecommended Links \nExperience the Greatest Innovation in Shaving...for Free \nYou only have 9 days left to enjoy the best shave of your life for free. \nJoin thousands of men from around the world who are experiencing \nthe unrivaled performance OneBlade technology offers. Don't miss \nout. Act now.  \nOneBlade — Rethought. Retooled. Rebuilt. \nMailbag \nReaders continue to weigh in on the state of U.S. politics. Here are more \nresponses to Monday's issue, \"Trump's Biggest Deal.\" \nSarah Palin will be the V.P. with Trump, and you may be surprised that they \nwill have a balance budget within three years. And with Obamacare repealed, \njob killing regulations eliminated, and corporate tax rates cut, it will make the \nU.S. more business friendly. \n— Christopher F. \nGood God! Anything is better than just giving it to Hilary and her \ndespicable husband. \n— Judy P. \nThanks for including Jefferson and von Mises, my favorite Galician, in \nthe list of good guys. Our economy cannot be repaired without \ndismantling the Fed. As you often point out, our monetary system is \nrotten at the core, as it is based on credit. \nI read in one of these letters from a libertarian source that Jefferson \nwrote, already in 1810 or so, that he had failed to set up a free country \nas he envisioned.., and that was still more than too years before the \nFederal Reserve Act. \nOn the other hand, even today, I strongly believe that if we just followed \nthe Constitution, we would be okay — especially the loth amendment. I \nthink that is the most important of all. \n— Chaim K. \nIn the words of Warren Zevon, \"Send lawyers, guns, and money; the s---\nhas hit the fan.\" \nThe Democratic Party is electing a known criminal, and they don't care, \nas long as it's their criminal. They just assume all politicians are \ncriminal, and the really good ones get their districts what they need. \nWould anyone let Harry Reid babysit their children? The Republican \nParty is electing anybody who is not a politician. Donald Trump just \nhappens to be the best known, \"anybody\" who is running. \n— Wayde L. \nAll I can say about Bill's message on Monday is: \"Amen, brother! Amen!\" \nHe hit every nail right on the head. \nTo those self-deluding worthies who think that a Donald Trump \npresidency will solve all of America's problems I say, \"Get your heads \nout of your collective a***s, because it ain't gonna happen.\" \nTrump will continue the policies (if we can laughably call them such) of \nthe Deep State... with a dash of Adolph Hitler thrown in for good \nmeasure. Clinton will be no better, if not worse. \nI'm with Bill — a vote for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil. \nHowever, unlike him, I will vote, but for a third-party candidate who \ndoesn't have a snowball's chance of winning. A \"wasted\" vote is better \nthan a vote for Trump or Hillary. \n— Dale A. \nI think you are correct in your assessment of the Deep State. I disagree \nin how to deal with it. \nIt seems easy for the rich or the poor to walk away and state it doesn't \nmatter. The poor because they do not have a choice; the rich because \nthey do. For those of us in the middle we need to deal with it, lest we \nend up in the poor camp. For me, a decision that includes a less bad \nscenario is still a decision worth pursuing. \n— Rudy R. \nIn Case You Missed It... \nThe third part of Doug Casey's \"virtual workshop\" on how to turn crises into \nwildly profitable investments goes live today. \nIn it, Doug pulls back the curtain on his shocking forecast for America in \n2016. And how he believes you could set yourself up to profit from it in a big \nway... with just one decisive move. \nGo here to reserve your spot. \nE"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033599.txt_6319
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033599.txt
subject: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "Jun 24, 2011, at 7:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "eric, price for a re-rag , new seats , g-v , paint and interior, plus approx time after choosing fabrics etc."}, {"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "Any photos? Serial number?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 25, 2011 12:29 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "not yet"}, {"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/27/2011 4:17:37 PM", "subject": "Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "Jeffrey-\n! need to start off by stating that it is not my intent to go around Shawn Lancaster on this — Shawn is a friend. \nThis being said, I have received e-mails from both you and Larry this weekend. \nI called Larry and he said I should send you an e-mail. \nI called a close friend of mine inquiring about the GV market and aircraft that are \"not published\". As of today, \nthere are eight (8) of these aircraft that are not yet on the market. \nLet me know if you would like to speak with him and by what means (you call him, he call you, call \nLarry ....whatever). \nBy the way, his company sold Trumps 727 and got Trump a very attractive number for an aircraft that was on \nit's way to a museum. \nHope all is well."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033151.txt_6326
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033151.txt
subject: now look what youve done
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "6/1/2019 10:59:01 PM", "subject": "now look what youve done", "body": "https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/44649 1 -trump-announces-departure-of-white-house-lawyer-\n\nemmet-flood"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033145.txt_6336
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033145.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid [as"], "timestamp": "5/19/2019 10:39:32 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-19/the-world-agrees-with-trump-on-one-thing-when-it-comes-to-iran"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026165.txt_6344
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026165.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Aug 25, 2017, at 00:57", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic <q@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Great. I am back from LA thursday"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 25, 2017 6:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Private Donor Helps Fund Scientists After\nTrump's Proposed “Anti-Science” Budget\nCuts\n\nwww.huffingtonpost.com\n\nThe famous American Astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson,\nonce said, “The good thing about science is that it's true,\nwhether or not you believe in ..."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/25/2017 11:27:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: Re:", "body": "Great!\n\nCan you get a bigger coverage (beside Huff post)??\nBill and others should join!\n\nB"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030572.txt_6360
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030572.txt
subject: basketball player
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 2 2011 08:40 PM", "subject": "basketball player", "body": "obama was scheduled to sign the debt bill late yesterday, just hours before the midnight Treasury deadline that could have seen the US default on its debts, a national humiliation likely to have had a huge impact on markets and the global economy."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026310.txt_6361
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026310.txt
subject: Bannon on How 2008 Planted the Seed for the Trump Presidency
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/11/2018 2:23:22 AM", "subject": "Bannon on How 2008 Planted the Seed for the Trump Presidency", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/steve-bannon-on-how-2008-planted-the-seed-for-the-trump-\npresidency.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032515.txt_6365
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032515.txt
subject: Re: Meeting
messages:
  [{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:14 AM", "subject": "Meeting", "body": "Meeting this professor who studies quantum entanglement in brains"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Deepak Chopra"], "timestamp": "Sunday, March 5, 2017 10:16:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Meeting", "body": "physical processes , not intersting"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030804.txt_6377
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030804.txt
subject: Re: privieged
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "lots of reporters inquiries. !. doithink that trump set me up? what do i know about his dealings? . did\ni speak to you? suggestion. all public record, house bought out of a bankruptcy proceding . I was the\nstalking horse bid.. never before was there a prosecution of erotic massage by women for money in\nsomeones home. every girl got money. returned . most interviewed by police over 21. all public\nrecord. .some concern on my team that i will get a cong subpoena. doi have to wear a tie?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:13 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "Again! Why you need a team in place! Where are you with Ollie?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:17 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "hes great. he needs to get the documents from the law firms that are wholly focused on this submission to\nthe judge. . BTW He asked for Imilllion per month . for a year. ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:24 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "Expensive. But... In a way this new round of calls is an opportunity: reporters suddenly thinking they don’t\nknow something or that there is a new angle—now would be a good moment to hit them with a better prepared\nset of responses. Somebody, Ollie or otherwise, should get started on this."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 11:46:19 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/saudi-arabias-mohammed-bin-salman-16208376 russian oligarch\n\nsame as pb house"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030295.txt_6383
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030295.txt
subject: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "G Maxwell", "recipients": ["J Jep [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/11/2015 1:25:56 PM", "subject": "Fw:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Philip Barden", "recipients": ["<a"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 11 January 2015 05:27", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Saying nothing is reputational suicide. Even iff is discredited by i people will know JE paid her off and\nbelieve G was complicate absent a credible denial.\n\nNow it is reported that G engaged in direct abuse - as I feared would happen. Next reports to the authorities will\nbe made.\n\nIt is necessary from a litigation, investigatory and reputational reason to issue a cogent denial.\n\nI can see why JE doesn't want this as it may not suit him but he is already toast.\n\nPhilip"}, {"sender": "Ross", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "10 Jan 2015, at 18:42", "subject": "Fw:", "body": "Had Geordie on the phone half a dozen times today.\nHe would have give us a better hearing than most I figure.\n\nStrongly believe saying nothing is the wrong thing - especially as Dershowitz has a big piece coming in The\nTimes on Monday.\n\nRest up and speak Monday\n\nBest\n\nRoss"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030214.txt_6384
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030214.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/7/2017 7:12:15 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "James Drougas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Hi Paul. I've been spending lots of time with Irwin Corey and his family past two weeks especially. He was in hospital until the last week and then He died a few hours ago peacefully at home in bed. Last night he told me Trump will be assassinated soon. He was eager to learn the news each day. I asked him if he would join the anti Trump rallies when he gains strength. Doctors thought he might live many months. Alas he was laughing and smiling till the end and frowning about Trump. Warm and loving regards Jim Drouaas My friend Alana, a young comedian, was here with him most nights. Irwin used to say he will live to 147. Alana explained that 102 is 147 in comedian years."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026159.txt_6389
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026159.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lang, Caroline", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jack Lang PF"], "timestamp": "7/11/2017 9:40:01 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Yes, I saw the news"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "lundi 10 juillet 2017 23:17", "subject": "RE:", "body": "retrump. asi said they will first go after his family"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030200.txt_6391
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030200.txt
subject: Indicting a President Is Not Foreclosed: The Complex History - Lawfare
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/19/2018 5:30:40 PM", "subject": "Indicting a President Is Not Foreclosed: The Complex History - Lawfare", "body": "https://www.lawfareblog.com/indicting-president-not-foreclosed-complex-history\n\nIndicting a President Is Not Foreclosed: The Complex History\n\nCan a sitting president be indicted? Often, in answering this question, commentators point to Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinions answering in the contrary. To whatever extent the writer agrees or disagrees with the opinions' conclusion, the government's position on the matter is usually presented as a long-standing and clear \"no.\"\n\nThe reality is more complicated. The United States has addressed this question six times in both internal memos and briefs filed in litigation. And a review of these documents shows that it is far from clear what criminal prosecution steps are (or should be) precluded—and that there is no \"longstanding policy\" against indictment of the president. Consider the 1973 OLC memo stating that a sitting president should not be indicted. Far from being authoritative, it was essentially repudiated within months by the Justice Department in the United States' filing in the Supreme Court in United States v. Nixon.\n\nLikewise, the most recent opinion—an OLC memo written in 2000—includes brief statements that a sitting president should not be indicted even if all further proceedings are postponed. But far from being definitive, this is a matter that could be reconsidered by the department. Moreover, of course, OLC opinions are not binding on state prosecutors (though state charges could raise federalism questions as well). The complex history of criminal proceedings against presidents and vice presidents suggests that these issues are not foreclosed.\n\nPerhaps the most important point that emerges from a review of all the opinions is this: only once has the United States addressed the question of whether a president can be an unindicted co-conspirator. The conclusion was an unequivocal yes. Richard Nixon was so named in the Watergate indictment, and that inclusion was sustained by Judge John Sirica and defended by the United States in United States v. Nixon. (The Supreme Court did not resolve the question.) No department opinion or filing has ever contradicted that position.\n\nThe fact that it is permissible to name a sitting president as unindicted co-conspirator, moreover, tends significantly to undermine the only argument against indicting a sitting president.\n\n(I should note that the U.S. Attorney's manual cautions against naming persons as unindicted co-conspirators \"[in the absence of some significant justification.\" Here, of course, the \"significant justification\" would exist if a sitting president is the only individual in the country who is immune from indictment. Thus, for that individual alone, the usual better course of indictment would not be available.)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032877.txt_6393
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032877.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjon JagIan"], "timestamp": "6/28/2016 8:44:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can settle even if john kerry wins :) /"}, {"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 4:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, terrible times. If Trump wins in US I'll settle on your island. Before that, I'll be in NY in September. Lot of things to talk about."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "tirsdag 28. juni 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you must be a very busy man \nhope to seee you soon"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033179.txt_6395
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033179.txt
subject: Now could be the time
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/29/2016 12:21:03 PM", "subject": "Now could be the time", "body": "There's an opportunity to come forward this week and talk about Trump in such a way that could garner you\ngreat sympathy and help finish him. Interested?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026510.txt_6397
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026510.txt
subject: This morning
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lis <a", "recipients": ["Maskin, Eric"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 4:16 PM", "subject": "This morning", "body": "It was fun and interesting.\n\nI admire your friends determination.\n\nAre you serious about working on this?\n\nHas anyone done a full analysis of this and polarization.\n\nSeems like on one hand it might encourage Ralph Nader cuz he d get more first round votes and not elect George bush. This might be bad."}, {"sender": "Maskin, Eric", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2018, at 6:05 PM", "subject": "This morning", "body": "Hi Larry,\n\nThank you very much for taking the meeting this morning. I’m glad you found it worthwhile, and I agree with you that Adam Friedman’s commitment to the project is impressive.\n\nI AM serious about working on this---it’s a nice opportunity to make important practical use of some interesting theory. Voting rules may seem nerdy and dry, but they can make an enormous difference to actual politics\n\nThe formal argument that RCV promotes centrism better than the current system (plurality rule) is straightforward. Suppose that most voters vote ideologically in the sense that the closer a candidate is to their own position on the left-right spectrum, the more like they are to vote for him. Then under majority rule (my favorite voting system)---in which voters rank candidates and the winner is the candidate who beats all other in pairwise comparisons----the winner will be the median voter’s favorite candidate ----- in other words, the most centrist candidate gets elected (this assumes that there are enough candidates running so that there is one who is reasonably close to the median voter). Now observe that RCV is in between majority rule and plurality rule, and so will promote centrism better than plurality rule.\n\nBest wishes, Eric"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026304.txt_6413
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026304.txt
subject: Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist' Kochs, 'lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly I TheHill
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 3, 2018 7:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist' Kochs, 'lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly TheHill", "body": "http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/400188-exclusive-bannon-blasts-con-artist-kochs-lame-duck-ryan-diminished"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 3, 2018 08:13:37 -0400", "subject": "Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist' Kochs, 'lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly TheHill", "body": "loved , not donors - but marks"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist' Kochs, 'lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly TheHill", "body": "Buried lede"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 3, 2018, at 8:17 AM", "subject": "Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist' Kochs, 'lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly TheHill", "body": "keep close ! This much we know - the Fall elections are shaping up to be a referendum on the most divisive American President in memory. The battle for potential Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh's nomination this fall will only amplify the polarity of the political debate that is already deeply overwrought on both sides. The rising tide of pressure on Donald Trump from the Mueller investigation shows no sign of ebbing. Unless the underlying political dynamics are disrupted, the outcomes of these unprecedented events will still leave us with the same unsatisfactory two front battlefield of the 2016 Presidential election. Watching these unrelenting, compounding events since our discussion in May, I am guessing we are all asking the same question: now what? For the 48 percent of Americans who believe Donald Trump should not be in the White House, perhaps we too want our own \"chaos\" candidate in 2020? Should Trump run again, this could be a \"break glass\" moment for the majority of Americans who don't support him. Do we want to break the genteel precedents of two parties running their ceremonious and seemingly illogical nominating process to select a candidate? (Why do Iowa and New Hampshire play such outsized roles? What kind of small-d democratic process relies on superdelegates?) The system failed in 2016, with both parties producing terribly flawed candidates in a race to the bottom. We need to build a back-up plan in the event the system fails again. It's possible, of course, that we won't need a third-party candidate. Trump could decide not to run for whatever reason. The Democrats could nominate a winning 2020 candidate. I am not willing to take those bets. The ideal candidate for a new third party is someone who is widely perceived to be that rare combination of both good and great. We are looking for a proven leader of men and women, someone with clear, democratic — and moral — values that reflect the best of America, not our worst. We know people like this on the national stage now. As a thought experiment, consider the possibilities of a ticket outside the partisan lanes and imagine the chemistry of radical combinations: Biden/Romney? Bill Gates/Hogan? Bloomberg/Haley? Howard Schultz/Bob Corker? Sandberg/Kasich? As we have discussed narrow path to electing the first president outside the two major party primary system in 168 years is more navigable than most think. Heading into 2020, converging trends in American's demands for a third party (a historic high of 61%), disapproval of Donald Trump holding steady above 50%, and the increasingly leftward drift of the Democratic Party suggest that electorate may be susceptible to merits of a new centrist party. Cynics will say that the structural impediments of ballot and presidential debate access, the overwhelming advantages of legacy parties' fundraising and voter turn-out operations preordain failure, but they're wrong; the legal and logistical hurdles are amenable to a combination of lawyering and resources. The bigger, more consequential factors come in terms of candidate quality and policy. I believe a candidate with five specific characteristics including a unique — and purposefully non-specific - policy agenda could limbo a win. • This is what I think a successful third-party candidate looks like; a dream third party ticket would start off with enough name ID to be an instant contender. Building the name ID to run nationally is just too long and expensive of a process to accomplish in the 28 months until the next presidential election. We can't beat a celebrity without some celebrity of our own, whether from politics, sports, business, or entertainment. Instantaneous name ID is so crucial because the candidate must start out in striking distance in any three-way poll against Trump and a fill-in-the-blank Democratic flavor-of-the day candidate. The media and political class will predetermine irrelevance otherwise. • A Democrat-leaning candidate would have to top the ideal third-party ticket. We need someone with a shot at snaking a plurality of the vote in the blue states Hillary Clinton won (227 electoral votes), but moderate enough to win a plurality in some combination of Trump states like Florida, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan (another 119 votes). The right candidate may even to put North Carolina, Ohio, Indiana in play for a centrist bi-partisan ticket as well (totaling an electoral sweep of 464 elector votes). A right leaning candidate would meet the same fate as a primary challenger to Trump — for all intents and purposes we need to assume that 36% of voters won't be cleaved from Trump under any circumstances and run to win around them. The deep red states would be off the table entirely. • With the Trump reality show airing daily, voters are now expecting to take their politics with a side of entertainment. Heretofore, ratings will matter no matter how dry the policy topic. Surely Stephen Colbert would gladly sacrifice his executive producer Chris Licht to produce a daily comedic segment of this dream candidate interviewing Americans in truck stops and McDonald's across the country. A few of the \"Saturday Night Live\" script writers could certainly be enticed to disguise serious debates as informative amusement. Any candidate must be committed to a near daily cadence of high quality, compelling video production. It will be especially crucial to keep the voters' attention during what will be a raucous Democratic primary season. Rules governing access to the general election debate stage dictate that a candidate enjoy support of at least 15% of voters in the months leading up to the general election. • This dream candidate would pledge to serve only four years and address all of the U.S.'s ticking time bombs like Social Security, Medicare, health care reform, climate change, money in politics, gerrymandering, and infrastructure investment in a single term. This one-and-done term decouples our candidate from the usual politics and gives them the power of promise and deliver decisive action. A four-year term pledge ensures governance independent of campaign finance concerns and narrow special interests inherent to winning re-election. This \"fix-it\" ticket would promise to force decisions on all the underlying structural policy matters damaging America's long-term prospects and distorting our democracy. No more kicking the can down the road. • This candidate should also pledge to push for laws passed that reflect the will of simple majorities in Congress. Congress now only allows bills to move forward when a \"majority of a majority\" supports the policy and on many levels seems fundamentally broken. This third-party president could force votes based on a transparent reading of where the votes lie via coalition building. The Senate filibuster power will present a high hurdle, but a third-party candidate would be a de facto disruptor of the two-party system. Party discipline could well break down, and moderates in both parties could form a powerful, decisive block willing to work with the new President. The policies passed into law may not be ideal for either Democrats or Republicans, but for the major agenda items that must be addressed for America's long-term health, an imperfect fix that corrects course is better than those that now have us hurtling toward national bankruptcy. And if no candidate secures 270 electoral votes in 2020? The House of Representatives would choose the next president. In 2016, reports suggested Michael Bloomberg declined to run on a third-party ticket for fear of splitting support from Hillary Clinton and throwing the election to a GOP-controlled House of Representatives who would then vote to select the president. The fear was the GOP controlled House would have just elected Trump. Would Democratic control of the House mean that the House would pick an alternative to Trump as president? Each state delegation has a single vote in selecting a president and it is the incoming Congress - the class elected in 2020 that would decide the election. But no matter which party has the speaker's chair, the GOP would almost certainly have the upper hand in the majority of state delegations controlled. Would the state delegations pick a president based on party majority control of the delegation, the winner of the popular vote in each state or their own calculations as to who is best for America? Precedent suggests that delegations use secret ballots, which means individual lawmakers may vote their consciences. If we recruit this ideal candidate; threading the needle of name ID, a center-left bent, a TV- savvy campaign team and a pledge to serve only four years with an apartisan agenda, money and campaign expertise would certainly follow. And 50 state ballot access is a function of time (starting in the fall of 2019 would be prudential) and hard work as we have discussed and many of you have exhaustively war-gamed. Part and parcel of this effort would be motivating the often politically lackadaisical middle to vote. The raft of new technologies in data targeting and biometric mobile voting technology could transform the electorate in the next few, amping voter participation and injecting the voices of moderates (both in political views and level of political interest) into the process. And any third-party effort must incorporate advocacy for accelerated adaption of these all but inevitable voter verification tools. I believe Silicon Valley could be game-changing allies in this effort. I am sure none of us doubt that chaos could potentially be unleashed by jamming three viable candidates into a two-party system. An election that ends up in the House of Representatives is an uncontrollable, murky and ancient process. But might that be a less scary prospect than relying on the Democrats to nominate a candidate who can beat Trump in 2020?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, August 3 2018 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist' Kochs, 'lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly I TheHill", "body": "Where is this from???"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022189.txt_6422
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022189.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, November 11, 2016 2:06 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I saw that, amazing. \nI also think it's shocking she is 35 in the recent picture (if she was 13 in '94). She looks 20 years older."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10, 2016 5:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025180.txt_6425
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025180.txt
subject: Re: Your Special Day
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:07 AM", "subject": "Your Special Day", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nCongratulations on another spin around the sun.\n\nI would like to offer you a birthday present: my best efforts for a few hours on something where I might be able to contribute either to making something good happen for you or help you prevent the bad.\n\nWe haven't talked much at all for quite some time, so I'm not sure of the nature of your current interests but here are some of mine, where I feel I either have some special capability or can get access to those who have such.\n\n* open science -- open access publishing, data publishing, and open culture institutions considered as a network with largely consistent and mutually reinforcing values: Public Library of Science (PLoS), Wikipedia, Internet Archive, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Creative Commons, along with allied US, UK, European governmental and NGO funding sources and other institutions.\n\n* early-stage life science-based ventures, especially those with one or more of these technologies: optics, wearable-sensors, brain-computer interface, behavioral engineering that goes beyond robo-noodging. I am not up to speed on synthetic bio and CRISPR, but I have a good friend who is.\n\n* cybersecurity for you and your life. I have carefully monitored the web for articles about you and I have reason to think that those will persist indefinitely. I would be remiss as your friend if I did not encourage you to be as diligent and smart as possible in using tools like Signal, two-factor/multi-factor authentication, taking webmail archives off the web onto your own secure privately maintained archive or deleted (unlike Podesta), and other measures.\n\n* publicity for your cool-ass creative and important philanthropy in support of really good and adventuresome, high-risk basic science research. Most obvious benefit: it would be nice to know you hung out with the bright"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 2:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "1. is probability a force rather than a markter. if you look at a bell curve from scratch, it looks as if it under a force pushing things towards the center. i think gravity might be just that. 2. all signals in nature need to be envvyrpted so that the enemy cannot read. this includes inner signals that if you are aware of, can give you up to your predator. so signals from the nose , my conjecture is that each person has its own enxruption de encyption algorithm built in. fyi having dinnner with Jin Watson."}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Probability as a force rather than a what?\nDidn't suss out the next word...\n\nWatson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism when I saw him talk —4 years ago on book tour @Google. I met him once through Gunther Stent, as well as Crick on another occasion. Know him well?\n\nD."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "pretty well"}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Cool. And the former question, of clarification?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "probablity and statistics gets its strengh from the law of large numbers. centrifigal force is a pseudo force but not distinguishable in the right frame. . like gravity, lets assume that there is a force pushing heads and tails towards a 50 50 distribution. . not merely recording it. regression to the mean. etc. would. could be a force similar to the EM one."}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "http://xkcd.com/123/ can't resist!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "yes , now assume that there i a balancing force. and gravity is merely the result of paticles being pushed together . etc"}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Is there something for central tendency that is like an inertial reference frame, from which a different abstract understanding of probability develops, one that's better for showing the kloodgey, apparent force nature to which you point?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 1:03:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "god s reference frame :)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033192.txt_6428
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033192.txt
subject: aapl
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 3:04:29 PM", "subject": "aapl", "body": "http://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/14/apple-iphones-could-be-hit-if-trump-imposes-a-45-percent-tariff-on-china-exports-beijing-warns.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022837.txt_6430
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022837.txt
subject: Re: How are you holding up?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 16, 2015 7:35 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "very well, my reputation has admittedly taken a hit. however, again, more calls re currency than i can handle. in addition I am considering a statement and positon that Out of respect and love for my former girlfrend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never questioned, or subpeonaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her name. however during the entire time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere, each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers She never saw anything that claims. She can confirm 1. I was never alone at the house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained, not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2 , were local strippers, that would call all the time asking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship, I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. . 7 She woudl acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. ( no sex J. . they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, . . 8. answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to 60."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon <______________________>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "Landon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times\nhttp://topics.nytinnes.conn/top/reference/tinnestopics/people/t/landon jr thonnas/index."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029962.txt_6431
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029962.txt
subject: Re: I beat Bush
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2/3/2016 1:22:56 PM", "subject": "Re: I beat Bush", "body": "Great"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 3 February 2016", "subject": "Re: I beat Bush", "body": "Hi Jeffrey, \nI got more votes than Jeb Bush got in Iowa, and I only had one congressional district, he had four!! It's so \nfunny (to me — totally embarrassing to him)!!! Still like Trump CD and might be a delegate to the republican \nconvention. \nWas in St. Thomas for a couple of days — did call this island, but never heard back. Went scuba diving off St. \nJeff and it was beautiful. Would be totally funny (to me at least) if you put a big fake shark or statute under the \nwater where the divers go.... \nLove ya,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029976.txt_6437
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029976.txt
subject: Bobby Slayton
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Francis Derby"], "timestamp": "9/10/2012 5:01:27 PM", "subject": "Bobby Slayton", "body": "Bobby slayton will be in LA on sept. 18th (he said if you are hosting obama in NY though, he could make \nthe effort to attend) \nBelow from Bobby re the dinner he would like to have: \n> AND Tuesday the 16th is perfect for dinner with David And Lewis And if woody makes it GREAT, if not, \nalways fun to hang with 3E111 David Brenner said he would try to change his flight if only Monday works!! \nBut the boys are definately in for Tuesday!!! \nMay I tell Bobby the 16th is good for dinner AND invite Woody? \nLyn & Jojo are back to work on Oct. 16th (they are home on 15th) \nLinda stone will be in NY and staying in an apt Oct. 13-17"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032888.txt_6438
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032888.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Lets catch up next time you are in NYC. NYT is making me write more on markets now and I don't really know who to believe any more re where the market is going these days."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no place else to invest for alpha, your children are rich"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "If you knew Trump was going to win, how would you position your portfolio?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:52:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "give me a number ill call"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032650.txt_6443
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032650.txt
subject: Marilyn
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "at the moment we will go to lsh on sunday the 26th early then to new york where i will stay the week, larry , it will be assayay and I, trump is in town that week,"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017 at 6:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "Will you want to bring back Marilyn or Carluz/Arline for the week you are in NY?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 6:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "marilyn"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "11/17/2017 11:48:52 AM", "subject": "Marilyn", "body": "Reminder: Jojo and Merwin both requested off Nov. 25 and 26 to be with family in town and celebrate Brianna's 16th Birthday. We will need to bring Marilyn to NY to help prepare for your arrival. We should have Sonam and Leo to help as well. Shall we get a flight for Marilyn early Sat. Nov. 25th morning?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031529.txt_6445
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031529.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Marc.Kensington", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/27/2016 8:41:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Too bad. I was excited to have a"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2016-11-27 17:54 GMT+00:00", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will not come this week, too many trump issues. . anything new. exciting.\nhas mr kiss come to reality?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030637.txt_6450
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030637.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016, at 12:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "bring me up to speed."}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 9:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Moving (small places in Raleigh and Bellevue), wrapping up taxes, wrapping up fire claim, trying to figure out if technologies that soothe the nervous system (that offer the positive effects that meditation or massage might offer) are worth working on....\n\nAnd wondering if the fact that so many people are on anti-depressant, adhd, and other drugs, is what makes trump appealing and his flaws invisible...\n\nWill you have a cabinet position?\nHow are you?\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016, at 12:15 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think he can win?"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/25/2016 7:46:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "“Psychically” and that puts me way out on the edge, that’s what it looks like. People are blinded by him. He has a hypnotic effect.\n\nYou asked about power a long time ago. And - he seems to have an effect on masses (that troubles me) that hypnotizes. Add to this that Clinton is charisma-compromised.\n\nI don’t want him to win. I find this troubling."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033228.txt_6464
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033228.txt
subject: The article
messages:
  [{"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Fred Haddad", "Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "3/14/2017 12:31:06 PM", "subject": "The article", "body": "http://www.floridabulldog.org/2017/03/trump-on-witness-list-lawsuit-pedophile/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033200.txt_6473
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033200.txt
subject: NYTimes: Trump's Economic Cabinet Picks Signal Embrace of Wall St. Elite
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "12/1/2016 3:46:53 AM", "subject": "NYTimes: Trump's Economic Cabinet Picks Signal Embrace of Wall St. Elite", "body": "Wow. This is truly moronic. \nhttp://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/30/business/dealbook/trumps-economic-cabinet-picks-signal-embrace-of-wall-st-elite.html?smprod=nytcore-ipad&smid=nytcore-ipad-share \nSteven mnuchin, the financier who has been tapped to run Treasury, joins other wealthy investors chosen by Mr. Trump, a sign of possible tax cuts and deregulation ahead."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033566.txt_6475
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033566.txt
subject: NY Post: Vanessa Trump files for divorce from Donald Trump Jr.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Dangene and Jennie Enterprise", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/15/2018 9:54:45 PM", "subject": "NY Post: Vanessa Trump files for divorce from Donald Trump Jr.", "body": "I thought you'd be interested in this story: \nVanessa Trump files for divorce from Donald Trump Jr. \nEXCLUSIVE \nhttps://pagesix.com/2018/03/15/vanessa-trump-files-for-divorce-from-donald-trump-jr/?utm_campaign=iosapp&utm_source=mail_app"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031501.txt_6483
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031501.txt
subject: Re: Saudi money
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon [landonjr@nytimes.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 1:47:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "what is your back of the envelope guess as to much saudi money tied up in such funds?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed . and im not seeing much in the secondary market. . blackrock is more money market , more like custodian than investor ."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with what you know?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "words that you to refer to one thing, USA. the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very useful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even intech, needs bio tech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are 20k members of a tribe. called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is focused on bin salman, or the very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local costco... _ but they are aware that a message needs to be sent to their population , regarding the next 20 years, social media, and the selfie crowds post the best of everything, their cutest pictures the amazing food , the luxury resorts. the masses see these things and as the difference between expectations and reality widen, the anger grows. trump has tapped in. with the passage of the 9 11 saudi bill, unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france that revolted against their own aristocracty, with the internet and globalization of discontect it is now the americans that can revolt against the saudi leadership. _it is the americans that are demanding women drive. not the saudis"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have been called in to help on a big NYT investigation into how low oil prices have been effecting the personal finances of royal family in Saudi Arabia. Obviously they called in much of their cash from the likes of BlackRock and others but I thought you might have some ideas. Maybe some people to talk to? I would think its more than cutting down on yachts and private planes or selling real estate in Paris, Istanbul, London. Any thoughts? PS: does my story on Abraaj get me a meeting with Gates next time he is in town:)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033214.txt_6508
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033214.txt
subject: your boy trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 10:35:55 PM", "subject": "your boy trump", "body": "I saw this post about Trump's difficulty in getting entertainers and cracked up:\nIt is rumored also that comrades Boris and Natasha and Fearless Leader have also offered performance at\ntremendous inauguration of Moose and Squirrel."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032637.txt_6514
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032637.txt
subject: Re: Kuhn - CNN - Xi and New Politburo Standing Committee - 10.26.17.pdf
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/6/2017 1:19:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You nailed it! (before —1/2 of family). \nStill in China - from Party Congress through Trump \"State+ Visit\". Many interviews/commentaries (CNN/BBC \nattached). \nMore important (from some ultimate reference frame): Radical Breakthroughs. Preproduction going well; \nexpect to send by end of month complete preproduction document, with 3-4 pages on each of the 13 episodes - \nrefined versions of the prototypes (first two episodes) I sent you in late Sept. Excited. Looking forward to \ndiscussing content. \nI'll be in NY from —Nov. 21/22 through early January. When to meet? Breakthroughs and of course politics / \ngeopolitics (so much). \nRobert"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032599.txt_6532
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032599.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "qa", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": "iE", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are we meeting in new york?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": "qa", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now’"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when is good for you? late thurs? fri lunch whatever you prefer."}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "see you then :)"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 5:26:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "see you inshalla &"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031228.txt_6533
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031228.txt
subject:
  Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "July 13, 2016 at 4:45:18 AM PDT", "subject": "Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "Steven J. Hoffenberg\nNew York Post Publishing INC.\nCEO\n\nWHAM INC THE PUBLIC COMPANY OWNS THE BELOW OPERATIONS\n\nTOWERSINVESTORS.COM\nCEO\n\nSEE\nWWwW.POST PUBLISHING.BUZZ THE JESUS CHRIST ON LINE GODs WORD NEWSPAPER\n\nMR HOFFENBERG ONLINE NEWSPAPER\nPUBLICSPEAKINGWALLSTREET.COM"}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Gary H. Baise", "Alan Fraade"], "timestamp": "July 13, 2016 at 6:26:21 AM EDT", "subject": "JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "SIR\n\nPRESIDENT TRUMP WILL KNOW THAT GARY BAISE IS WORKING ON THE NEEDED FOOD\nPOLICY POINTS OF FACT WITH THE FOOD INDUSTRY LEADERS .\n\nPRESIDENT TRUMP UNDERSTANDS THAT THE FOOD INDUSTRY IS VITAL TO THE TRUMP\nWHITE HOUSE POLICY .\n\nWHAT IS NEEDED IN THE PRESENTATION TO PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP WILL BE DON\nE BY OUR TEAM THAT NOW HAS THE KEY JOB AT THE STEVEN\n\nHOFFENBERG TRUMP SUPER PAC IN BUYING OVER $ 1 BILLION DOLLARS IN ADS & T\n\nHE HIRING OF THE BUS PROJECT TO GET OUT THE VOTE IN EVERY POOR AREA IN THE\nUSA.\n\nTHE POOR VOTER OVER 120 MILLION VOTERS THAT WERE DEMS ARE NOW VOTING FO\nR PRESIDENT TRUMP ON NOV 8 2016.\n\nT V EXPERTS DONT REPORT THE ABOVE DEMS POOR FOLKS THAT ARE VOTING FOR PR"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031192.txt_6553
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031192.txt
subject:
  Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo

messages:
  [{"sender": "Florence Anthony", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "December 24, 2015 at 11:08:55 AM EST", "subject": "Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo", "body": "Hot Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Crime Covered Up By President Obama\n\nBy Steven Hoffenberg\nPublisher/CEO\n\nLisa Twardeau died at the dirty hands of billionaire Jeffrey Epstein's lies about the crimes he committed while working atTowersinvestors.com.\n\nJeffrey Epstein looted Towers Investors of billions of dollars in ponzi crimes at the time Lisa became the wife of Steven Hoffenberg, who was Epstein's boss at Towers Investors.\n\nEpstein defrauded the Towers Investors with a cover-up after taking $2 billion from Towers and depositing it into the Epstein Hedge Fund Financial Trust Corp.\n\nLisa Twardeau died when she was going to expose the fact that Jeffrey Epstein looted billions from Towers Investors by ponzi crimes.\n\nNow, from the grave, Lisa Twardeau slams arrogant ponzi crimes King Epstein in the tell-all book she wrote that reveals everything about Epstein and the Feds' cover-up with President Obama.\n\nThe Feds are bad. They are covering up the Epstein ponzi crimes. The Lisa Twardeau book states that the FBI is violating the law with this cover-up.\n\nThe book says President Obama told the Attorney General that Jeffrey Epstein was cooperating in an overseas banking crime, but the FBI can't arrest Epstein. These are all lies by the President of the United States.\n\nThe book says that President Obama lied to cover up his relationship with Larry Summers who is on Jeffrey Epstein's payroll.\n\nThe book could give reasons for the president to be impeached for obstruction of justice whereby the U.S. Attorney General will learn everything that is in the Twardeau book.\n\nReaders, stay with this hot story that reveals that a cover-up in America is taking place.\n\nThe Richard Nixon story all over again is in the Lisa Twardeau book coming soon........"}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Gary H. BaisallillW"], "timestamp": "December 24, 2015 at 11:44:20 AM EST", "subject": "Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo", "body": ""}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "December 24, 2015 11:11 AM", "subject": "Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "December 24, 2015 at 12:02:02 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/24/2015 5:04:27 PM", "subject": "Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029905.txt_6554
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029905.txt
subject: Fwd: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/7/2019 4:27:09 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Ann Coulter", "recipients": ["Friend <r-ysmIlbbqqlsnfcqqgvnrswzfrrbsfrffsqzpggvggfvzccqwtsb@humaneventsmail.com>"], "timestamp": "March 6, 2019 at 5:01:34 PM PST", "subject": "Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'", "body": "Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'\nStrangely, the media have suddenly taken an intense interest in the case of pedophile and major Democratic donor Jeffrey Epstein.\nIn 2005, the Palm Beach police were told by the mother of a young girl in West Palm Beach that her daughter had been brought to the Democratic donor's mansion and asked to have sex with him for money. This kicked off an intensive, one-year undercover investigation.\nThe police sifted through Epstein's garbage and interviewed 17 witnesses, including the housemen, who told of sex toys and dildos left behind after the underage girls left. One of Epstein's procurers, a 20-year-old local woman named Haley Robson, who was paid $200 for every teenaged girl she brought to Jeffrey, was cooperating with police, telling them she was like \"Heidi Fleiss.\" They obtained statements from five of Epstein's young victims, who said they'd been paid $200 to $300 to engage in various sex acts with ...\nContinue reading..."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014312.txt_6559
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014312.txt
subject: Financials trade for Monday
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, November 11, 2016 4:04 PM", "subject": "Financials trade for Monday", "body": "It's not too late to buy financials as a medium term trade. They've run up a lot this week but we're getting endless calls from generalists asking which banks to buy — there is still more upside to the sector. Banks also provide some offset to your bonds if interest rates continue to move. Our financials sector specialist thinks XLF could have another 20-25% upside given its many levers to the Trump trade: less regulation, higher interest rates/steeper yield curve, higher vol, economic growth, etc. The regional banks are asset sensitive and more of a pure play on a rates move but we view the larger cap banks as having even more upside to the Trump Trade given the above points.\n\nBuy an XLF 17March2017 call spread:\n• Buy the 105% call / sell a 110% call with a 115% at-expiry knock-in\n• Total premium: 1.75%\n\nAll eyes are on Sunday's 60 Minutes interview with Trump. Market is pricing that all regulations will be rolled back (very optimistic). Any hint that this is not true could lead to pullback on Monday.\n\nNote on tech: we're seeing FANG used as a source of funds with the rotation from growth into value. There's also the tax read-through: tech is already relatively tax advantaged @ 22%; Industrials are at 30%, Financials at 29%. Next year, tech could benefit from a repatriation tax holiday but that is viewed as more of a Q1/Q2 trade.\n\nMore thoughts on financials:\nWith respect to the economy, the market is certainly indicating that there will be a large fiscal stimulus which may send US growth higher and that's a good thing for financials for a wide variety of reasons, from employment to wages to loan growth and credit quality (even if somewhat offset by higher rates). It does remain to be seen exactly how much of this expected policy actually gets done, but at the moment, investors are willing to take a certain amount of growth on faith.\nSo those are positives for financials before we even discuss regulation. The move in the financials since the election would seem to indicate that investors have concluded that nearly every piece of financial regulation will get put into a shredder on day one of the new administration. The incoming administration has fueled that with comments about rolling back pieces (or more) of Dodd-Frank in particular. I can see making the case for that to the American public by saying that banks need less regulation in order to get more capital flowing into the economy to drive growth. Not only does that mean that the E is likely too low (meaning that the P/E is not as high as it seems) but it could help improve ROE's as well which could increase the multiple of that higher E investors are willing to pay. Note that while ROEs could go higher, it's unlikely that they can get back to the peaks..."}, {"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E.", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 14, 2016 12:05 PM", "subject": "RE: Financials trade for Monday", "body": "We continue to see buyers of XLF today. Funds are underweight financials in all regions, valuations are reasonable, earnings are improving and financials tend to outperform when bond yields rise.\n\nVol is higher today — refreshed pricing below.\n\nBuy an XLF 17March2017 call spread:\n• Buy the 105% call / sell a 110% call with a 115% at-expiry knock-in\n• Total premium: 1.86%\n\nGlobal Positioning in Stocks: Nigel Tupper notes the 4000 funds in our \"Positioning in Stocks\" analysis are more underweight Financials, on average, than any other sector and are underweight this sector in all regions of the world. If earnings continue to improve and yield rise, which is often the case in an upturn in our Global Wave, then the unloved Financials sector has the potential to continue to outperform.\n\nGlobal Quant Panorama: \"Bearish on Bonds\" stocks (which tend to move in the opposite direction to bond yields) tend to outperform our \"Bullish On Bonds\" when bond yields rise. The sectors that tend to perform best as bond yields rise are Energy, Tech, Materials, Banks, and Diversified Financials. Of these sectors, the laggards this year have been Banks and Diversified Financials. With a PE of 15.9x and a PB of 2.0x, Global valuations are reasonable. Also, Risk is near all-time lows in terms of PE in most regions. Now that macro and earnings data have triggered the beginning of a rotation, Value becomes very relevant."}, {"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "11/17/2016 6:05:47 PM", "subject": "Financials trade for Monday", "body": "Financials: buy XLF Mar17 $22 call with $26 KO for $0.87 with full premium rebate on KO\n\nOur Financials Conference was this week and client attendance was up by 66% from last year. Yes, banks/financials might pull back at some point after this run-up but we would be buyers on any pullbacks and we continue to see further upside from multiple expansion and earnings growth. Our analyst raised her price targets by —11% across the board. The long term rotation from bonds and div stocks into sectors like financials is only beginning.\n\nVol is higher on the week; what prices well now:\nBuy the XLF March 2017 $22 call with $26 Knock-Out (continuous) for $0.87, with a full premium rebate if knock-out occurs.\n\nThis prices attractively given flat call skew and if XLF breaches $26 and this knocks out, at least you get your premium back.\n\nPlease find our Financials report attached.\n\nFuture of Financials conference hosted 90 public and private companies at our Future of Financials conference. We are raising our price objectives across most of our names. Three primary reasons why we think there is upside remaining after the recent rally: 1) an improved outlook on both activity levels and interest rates, driving revenue upside; 2) potentially lower regulatory burden, particularly as new supervisory leadership can come with the new administration; and 3) relatively lighter positioning in US financials vs. other sectors. (Erika Najarian)"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033515.txt_6568
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033515.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 1, 2019 6:46 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/446491-trump-announces-departure-of-white-house-lawyer-emmet-flood"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:20 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Why is this interesting?...Donny duetsch now has a show....should I go on and talk about \"the jeffrey I know\"...?....i am in london when you are in paris...we should try to make progress then"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, June 3, 2019 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Future"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Huh?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "6/3/2019 1:20:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Nobt"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033273.txt_6570
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033273.txt
subject: Bombshell report emerges of alleged Trump affair with Playboy model I New York Post
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/16/2018 12:56:55 PM", "subject": "Bombshell report emerges of alleged Trump affair with Playboy model I New York Post", "body": "Importance: High \nhttps://nypost.com/2018/02/16/ronan-farrow-details-alleged-trump-affair-with-playboy-model-in-new-yorker-piece/"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033267.txt_6580
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033267.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 2:02:30 PM", "subject": "FYI", "body": "Trump estimate arrival Jan 12 evening \nPOTUS arrival — Friday, January 12th, time TBD (likely PM) \nPOTUS departure — Monday, January 15th, time TBD (likely PM) \nAdvance teams arrive tomorrow — hope to learn more specific times for these movements and will update you. \nRumors of a visit the following week are surfacing — January 10-21 st."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029087.txt_6582
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029087.txt
subject: Greetings from Japan
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeremy Rubin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/1/2017 5:18:08 AM", "subject": "Greetings from Japan", "body": "Hey Jeffrey,\nThought I'd check in and see what's up on your end.\n- I've been watching closely Trump's appointees and there, he might be putting Balaji (a big bitcoiner)\nas FDA head, and Allison seems to be somewhat in favor of something like Bitcoin. And of course,\nThiel has said that Bitcoin is what Paypal should have been... Curious to hear where your head is at\non this matter.\n- Last week, I presented my research at Stanford's BPASE, it was well received. The most interesting\nthing I came up with for that is an inverse-input contract; i.e., funds that are \"locked\" to be spent only\nin the case where there are other funds that are not used in a specific way. An example of something\nthat could be built with this: a matching donation contract, where you agree to donate your money to\ncharity if someone else donates to charity, and you would not be able to release your funds from that\nagreement until they use their funds not for charity.\n- I'm in Japan this week, teaching a class to 100 Japanese Engineers to get the up to speed on\nbitcoin (with DG). It's very interesting to see the trepidation first hand that they have with respect to\nthe technology, despite their debit-based society being more geared for it in any case (DG felt that\neven putting Bitcoin in the course name would scare away students). One of my friends (a hedge\nfund manager) told me that female japanese engineers are very good, and drastically under-valued. I\nmade sure to get a few invited to the class, we'll see if he's right. On the whole, it will be interesting to\nsee the caliber of engineer Japan has to offer on this front.\nBest,\nJeremy"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031566.txt_6594
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031566.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is it a coincidence that the russian that bought the house in palm beach and knows all , is the same guy that\nsold a painting last year to mbs for 450 million dollars. that was only worth 1. 5m?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "So MBS was paying him off? Why? Ideas?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "reminder trump overuled congress on yemen ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 9:37:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Starting to smell sweet, the way you put it!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033122.txt_6601
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033122.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jack LANG"], "timestamp": "9/26/2018 5:14:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tom pritzker has asked if you have ideas re the Pritzker Prize"}, {"sender": "Jack LANG", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:56 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Dear Jerffrey,\n\nHave you received my email about Serge Moati's film project?\nOur recent conversation on Trump was exciting.\n\nOnce again you are right.\n\nSee you soon,\n\nWith my friendship,\n\nJack"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Le 12 sept. 2018 a 13:24", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jack- tom - tom jacques"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030693.txt_6602
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030693.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great. Im thrilled for you. At the moment he’s coming tomorrow night"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist\" platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im off sat to europe mid east etc. return around the 30"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:16 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "don't forget I want to go with you to the mid east sometime..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why dont we also ask harvey weinstein to join to make sure we dont get any press :)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:20:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ha! On another note, this Woody thing is going south very quickly. Planning to speak to them this morning."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013482.txt_6604
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013482.txt
subject: Report on Stem Cells future
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steven Victor MD", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/23/2012 1:06:38 PM", "subject": "Report on Stem Cells future", "body": "PUBLISHED: 22 NOVEMBER 2012\nThe view from the US: Stem cell therapy steps up a gear with first\napproval and improved political climate\nSpecial Report\nPeter Winter\nPositive clinical data, increases in federal funding and the first regulatory approval of a manufactured stem\ncell product mean momentum is building in the US. With the re-election of President Obama, this is likely to\nconf nue\nShare on twitterShare on linkedinShare on facebookShare on email\nImage: Bigstock\nWhen US President Barack Obama came into office he made good on his promise to overturn President George W. Bush's executive\norder that - with the exception of a handful of existing stem cell lines - prohibited federal funding of human embryonic stem cell (hESC)\nresearch.\nSpecial Report - Stem Cell Research under Horizon 2020\nStem Cell Research in Horizon 2020: Experts debate what Europe must do to maintain its lead in regenerative medicine\nThe view from the US: Stem cell therapy steps up a gear with first approval and improved political climate\nView from Europe: Delivering on the vision of regenerative medicine and stem cells\nTalking to the experts: Why the EU should support human embryonic stem cell research in Horizon 2020\nOVERVIEW: Regenerate the future - human embryonic stem cell research is crucial to deliver health and growth\nThis easing of restrictions on hESC research was expected to engender enough confidence to attract investors into the space and\nencourage pharmaceutical and biotech companies to build robust product pipelines based on stem cell therapies. However, a tougher\nregulatory climate for biopharmaceuticals in general and a protracted legal challenge to the relaxing of rules on hESCs has served to\nkeep both big pharma companies and venture capitalists on the sidelines to date.\nNevertheless, there has been progress, particularly at the research end of the development spectrum. Three and a half years on stem\ncells are no longer high on the political agenda as they once were. This speaks to the generally positive public acceptance of stem cell\nresearch in the US. A Research!America poll of likely voters in the presidential election, conducted in August 2012, found that 61 per\ncent of prospective voters were in favor of expanding funding for hESC research.\nInvestor interest\nLooking back over his first term in office Obama can point to some major gains. These include funding increases for the National\nInstitutes of Health's (NIH) stem cell initiatives, and greater investor interest in the wider field of regenerative medicine including the use\nof adult stem cells and induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells.\nHowever, it hasn't all been smooth sailing. Although after protracted forethought, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave the\ngreen light for the Californian biotech Geron to begin the very first human clinical trial of a human embryonic stem cell-derived therapy\nin January 2009, the trial has not been without its problems.\nThe Phase I trial, treating patients with acute spinal cord injury, was hit with an FDA clinical hold causing significant delays to its\ninitiation in 2010. A year later, after 15 years' effort, the Geron washed its hands of the programme, blaming its withdrawal from the\nstem cell space on capital scarcity and uncertain economic conditions. The decision wiped out a leading player in hESC translation and\ncommercialisation. However, the regenerative medicine sector has been able to recover and is beginning to blossom. (See Public\nMarkets section below). The prime movers in the Geron trial are now attempting to revive it.\nResearch funding robust\nFederal funding for all forms of stem cell research has increased over the past four years. However, the NIH funding component for\nhESC has been dogged by litigation for the past three years. In Sherley v. Sebelius, researchers James Sherley and Theresa Deisher,\nwho worked with adult stem cells, claimed the NIH guidelines violated the Dickey-Wicker Amendment, which prohibits the use of federal\nfunds for research in which human embryos are destroyed or discarded. This overhang was not finally removed until August 2012 when\na three-judge panel from the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit unanimously upheld the NIH 2009 guidelines that\npermit funding of hESC research.\nThrough its Common Fund the NIH has established the Center for Regenerative Medicine (NIH CRM), to support this field, with the\ngoal of accelerating the translation of stem cell-based clinical therapies.\nState funding filling the void\nWith stem cell research in general not attracting a significant amount of venture funding, the California Institute of Regenerative\nMedicine (CIRM), which was established in 2004 with $3 billion for stem cell research at California universities and research institutions,\nhas begun to fill the void left by traditional venture capital firms. To date CIRM has allocated $150 million in funding to help move\npromising stem cell-based therapies from the bench into clinical trials.\n'We are a lot closer to having promising therapies ready for clinical trials, so it makes sense that we step up our engagement with\nindustry to help fund those trials and move those therapies closer to approval by the FDA,\" said Duane Roth, vice chair of the governing\nboard of CIRM.\nCIRM's funding for translational research is good news for biotech companies, providing them with a source of funds in a field where it\nremains challenging to raise private capital.\nThree biotech companies have been funded so far under CIRM's Strategic Partnership Awards initiative. A grant of $10.1 million was\nawarded to ViaCyte Inc. to continue preclinical research and initiate clinical testing of an embryonic stem cell-based therapy for patients\nwith insulin-dependent diabetes.\nMeanwhile, Bluebird Bio Inc. will use a $9.3 million grant to support a Phase I/II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LentiGlobin,\nthe company's programme for the treatment of the inherited blood disorder beta-thalassemia, which will be initiated in the US in 2013.\nStemCells Inc. has been awarded up to $20 million to fund preclinical development of its product consisting of purified human neural\nstem cells for treating Alzheimer's disease, with the goal of filing for permission to carry out a clinical trial in that time. In July, CIRM\napproved a separate award to the company for up to $20 million to fund preclinical development of a cell therapy for spinal cord injury.\nPublic Markets\nIt has been a good year for stem cell companies on the public markets, with the thirteen publicly-listed stem cell companies showing an\naverage increase in share price of 11.6 percent in the year-to-date.\nThis boost came from a regulatory approval and positive clinical trials results. It was a big breakthrough for the field as a whole when\nthe Canadian regulator Health Canada approved Prochymal, Osiris Therapeutics Inc.'s allogeneic stem cell treatment for graft-vs.-host\ndisease (GvHD) in children.\nThe decision marked the world's first regulatory approval of a manufactured stem cell product and the first therapy approved for GvHD\n— a devastating complication of bone marrow transplantation that kills up to 80 percent of children affected, many within just weeks of\ndiagnosis. The company's stock value has almost doubled in the course of this year.\nMeanwhile, Newark, California-based StemCells, Inc. has seen its shares rise 148 per cent in the year to date. In addition to its CIRM\ngrants, the company recently reported clinical and preclinical data demonstrating the therapeutic potential of a cell therapy for treating\nmyelination disorders.\nPluristem Therapeutics Inc.'s stock value also has jumped 44 per cent, on the strength of reporting a single case study in wh ich a\npatient with aplastic bone marrow who received an intramuscular injection of its PLacental eXpanded cells under compassionate use\nsaw an improvement. The company was also able to successfully complete a public offering which netted about US$30 million.\nPositive clinical trials will begin to encourage investment\nWhile still in their early stages of development - and with clinical trials having only involved a limited number of patients - reports to date\nhave been very promising, and provide further validation for encouraging investment in stem cell therapeutics. For example, data from a\nhuman embryonic stem cell trial conducted by Advanced Cell Technology and published in medical journal The Lancet, showed that\ntwo patients with Stargardt's disease, a degenerative eye condition, had regained some vision.\nIn addition, positive early data from a spinal cord injury trial involving StemCells' neural stem cells indicated that two patients with no\nfeeling below the site of injury were able to regain sensation, while in another study from the company, patients with a rare myelination\ndisorder were able to create myelin, an advance that holds promise for treating multiple sclerosis and cerebral palsy.\nThis scientific progress has helped breath a new sense of optimism into the US stem cell sector. The Fiscal Cliff apart, it seems likely\nthis momentum will continue now Obama has secured a second term.\nPeter Winter is a writer, editor and analyst on the global biotechnology industry. He is currently editor of BioWorld Insight."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027041.txt_6617
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027041.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:50 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "does the 23 work in cambridge"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Absolutely. 23rd is great. I teach my seminar that day at 1 but could tape in the morning or after class--in my office (very private), or at the Harvardx studios (less) or in the Woodberry poetry room (the nicest place). . If Woody wanted, we could bring some students into the taping or just do the two of us... \nWoody is absolutely welcome to come to the seminar, of course\nJohn McCain, Tony Kushner, Al Gore have all signed on the last 2 days... crazy"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Or we could do the taping at my house. That would be totally delightful too"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Oct 5, 2013, at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how much time should i allocate?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 10:59 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jeffrey, \nFor taping in Cambridge? For breakfast and taping at my house. Depends on what woody is up for. My ideal would be a 1/2 hour-40 minute conversation, but we could do a quick taping in 15 minutes ...my team can be ready\nAnd , just to remind,could also come to do taping in ny on 24th because I'm coming to New York the evening of 23rd for a YIVO event--to which you would both be most welcome I'm sure (YIVO is the largest collection of materials from Jewish Eastern Europe)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Oct 6, 2013, at 6:20 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ill check „ what time do you have to be in ny on the 23 rd? ?."}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/6/2013 12:57:52 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "This event is at the apartment of the chairman of the YIVO board. My plan had been to take the 4 or 5 shuttle and cab right here"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031637.txt_6633
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031637.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["iaborY."], "timestamp": "11/5/2016 1:38:24 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thank you for being understanding, I hate canceling, but i will explain when i see you. . the states will be in \nturmoil for awhile no matter who wins, its also possible that there will be court battles to decide . like bush \ngore. . one thing is for sure, women are angry, they have more power, and race relations are sensitve."}, {"sender": "Jabor Y.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "No worries. I understand your situation. I will leave on the 9th will be back on 13th. Again leave on the 16 \nand back on 18th. I had fixed an appoint for you on Monday with Shk. Hamad. Which I shall cancel and fix \nlater. Let me know when you plan again your trip to Doha."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, November 5, 2016", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "unfortunatlely, too much work around the election. I will need to cancel doha before the 9th, it is \ns0000 crazy. many stories to tell when i see you. when do you leave.? I feel badly about changes at the \nlast minute , but i hope you understand."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033298.txt_6637
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033298.txt
subject: Trump Wall Street
messages:
  [{"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/22/2016 4:15:25 PM", "subject": "Trump Wall Street", "body": "Any big finance names out there supporting trump that we have not heard about? We are trying to get an angle on who is supporting and who is not."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032838.txt_6640
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032838.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Merwin Dela cruz", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "5/14/2019 10:16:30 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Thank you for the heads up sir."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, May 14, 2019, 5:46 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "presidnet trump is going to be at our neighbors on thurs, so dont be surprsised if secret service check in"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025124.txt_6645
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025124.txt
subject:
  Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric

messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Your pal should stay out of press.\nPublic link to manafort will be a disaster.\nThis is a staggering shit show."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Summers"], "timestamp": "Friday, October 27, 2017 6:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "saudi?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Was there. Spoke well. Spent time w Softbank deputy Najeev or some such PIF guy too.\nFlying back.\nHow is life among the lucrative and louche?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:02 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "anyone stand out. . ? when we meet I will endeavor to mesmerize you with stories of D.C. so wild. !!!."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/27/2017 3:10:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Softbank deputy guy i liked and seemed aware and honest re Son.\nLots of slathering to saudis. I yipped about inclusion.\nI observed that half the IQ In world was possessed by women without mentioning they are more than 51 percent\nof population....\nMnuchin plumbs new depths.\nWar seems more likely than I used to think\nDjT is world s luckiest guy in terms of opposition, economy etc. still think his world will collapse.\nI'm trying to figure why American elite think if u murder your baby by beating and abandonment it must be\nirrelevant to your admission to Harvard, but hit on a few women 10 years ago and can't work at a network or\nthink tank. DO NOT REPEAT THIS INSIGHT"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031599.txt_6649
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031599.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas | EE"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 9:53:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "hawain tropic girl\n\nlauren petrella <a"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr. [iE", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon I", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump.\n\nBecause of this.\n\n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is\neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it --\nJeffrey enjoys his social life.\"\n\nThat story will never die."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022663.txt_6665
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022663.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": ". the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story, is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, \"he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never, it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday explaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs, transferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back here as \"reported fact.\" Problem with story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and unlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they might. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are public people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk tomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "anytime tomorw ok"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 2:22:04 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Can you talk at noon? Probably need about 30 minutes. What is best number?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030501.txt_6683
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030501.txt
subject: Re: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": ["Joseph Evangelisti"], "timestamp": "Thu Jan 28 04:56:55 2010", "subject": "Re: Fw: ", "body": "Daley and frankel are saying that I need to go on TV (CNBC) to defend our hedge funds. Thoughts?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jes Staley", "Joseph Evangelisti"], "timestamp": "Thu Jan 28 06:12:14 2010", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I wouldn't do it. Not yet and not from Davos. As you know, Davos has had some criticism in the press for bank CEOs attending and I feel like it's the wrong way to go for your first interview as IB CEO. I also think print has much more impact than TV. Talk to Lionel and Robert while you're there -- they are the two guys who can move the needle on this. And let's do more in print when you get back. In fact, Matt Zames and I spent an hour and a half with WSJ's Kate Kelly from the Journal on this issue for a major story she's doing on the Obama proposal. Let's have you quoted in that."}, {"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw: ", "body": "This is what my PR person said.\nI'm seeing Darling tomorrow morning."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 11:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw: ", "body": "kate kelly is a snake. im glad they said no interview. ask peters advice he is the pr genius"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030863.txt_6695
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030863.txt
subject: on trump [C]
messages:
  [{"sender": "Daniel Sabba", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/21/2015 1:31:09 PM", "subject": "on trump [C]", "body": "http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/donald-trump-is-the-worlds-greatest-troll\n\nthought provoking stats\n\nThe Republican Field Has Been Trumped\n\nGoogle News hits and Google searches (June 14, 2015, through July 12, 2015), compared with Betfair odds (as of July 19, 2015)\n\nMedia coverage (Google News hits)\n\nTrump 50%\nBush 15%\nChristie 9%\nWalker 8%\nJindal 6%\nCruz 4%\nRubio 4%\nPaul 2%\nKasich 2%\nHuckabee 1%\nGraham 1%\nPerry 1%\nFiorina 1%\nCarson 1%\nSantorum 1%\nPataki <1%\n\nPublic interest (Google searches)\n\nChance of winning nomination (Betfair)\n\n89 FIVETHIRTYEIGHT SOURCE: GOOGLE, PREDICTWISE, BETFAIR"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025118.txt_6696
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025118.txt
subject: Re: Is Donald still feeling good
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "R u still plugged in to the show?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 7:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "wild, there will be some changes this week.. funny but kaslowitz is getting turned down repeatedly, by firms unwilling to represent donald."}, {"sender": "LHS <IMI>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "More would represent Donald if Kaslowitz out of picture. Not surprising, very hard to be law firm representing POTUS and know what to do when potus lies to u.\n\nMy world thinks poorly of Gorelick for representing Jared.\n\nHow guilty is Donald?\nOf crudity surely\nOf gross ignorance surely\nOf being utterly without the intellect temperament for job surely\nOf being over line on family profiting very likely\nOf gross disregard for appearances almost surely.\nOf Russians having financial leverage. Less clear\nOf Russians helping in. Election w complicity of his campaign plausible but not certain\nStrikes me if u work for Donald u don't free lance so he is guilty of whatever his campaign did.\nDo u agree w foregoing?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 28, 2017, at 7:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "BTW, still not sure why michael klein decided to try to attack me. wasn't smart or necessary, . used our friendship as a source, . thought you should know. not nice"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/29/2017 12:49:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "With demand happy to consider and likely do. Dont want to go sucking up.\nDid Klein do it again? Agree bad business. Or are u referring to what u talked about months ago."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026563.txt_6697
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026563.txt
subject: FW: Zeitplan amfar Gala 19.5.2012
messages:
  [{"sender": "Cavan Mahony", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 5:51 AM", "subject": "wG: Zeitplan amfar Gala 19.5.2012", "body": "Hallo everybody!\n\nAttached (sorry in Germain) the Programm fort he lifeball on the 19th.\n\nActually there will be a Galadinner with our prime minister and Bill Clinton and all kinds of stars jin the Hofburg (former Imerial estate - very impressive to see from inside)) It is only 250 people,. A seated dinner and more upscale than the rest oft he evening. It start's at 5pm with a Champagne cocktail and from there we go directly to the opening oft he ball where we'll have a really cool Box first row! !\n\nDresscode: actually the lifeball is really crazy and ‘half naked’ We always do a intermediare because otherwise you feel like an idiot at the Amfar Gala dinner before. People now don't wear Tuxedos anymore. Christoph wear's normal black trouseres with a white shirt and a dar sakko because he doesn't want to be in any crazy stuff on all the pics. Half oft he people oft he gala dinenr also waer some ‘little’ crazy stuff like pink velvet sakkos Cand a mask for later) or so. girls: Crazy as you like. There are a lot of atrists that are really dressed up. I will wear a quiet see-through short dress with high high heels+ a chanel Tatoo and will take a face mask fort he ball later.\n\nSo I hope this helped at least a little bit. For pics got to: lifeball.org\n\nFriday night: we would like to invite you all for dinner and will organize a nice place with a cool bar. Aress follows. Pls let me know who wants to join!!\n\nSunday: I'm very sure we'll be dead :-) BUT we would like to invite you to our house/garden/pool Cswimmwear) for brunch starting at 11. Furfanggasse 4, 1190 wien. From hotel Sachen max. 15 min with Taxi. If you fly late we can walk from our house to one oft he famous Austrian heurigen ...and get some more alcholic to drink :-) :-)\n\nOn Thursday there is a big Premiere of Mozart La Clemenza de Tito. Very hard to get tickets but for 2 of you I could still organize (hopefully9 if some of you already arrive on Thursday.\n\nBig kiss to everbody...I promise you...not often you will have seen something that crazy :-)"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:27:15 PM", "subject": "FW: Zeitplan amfar Gala 19.5.2012", "body": "MM is my friend there who will host us. She is very close friend with i as well.\n\nMMM and I are still trying to get QBNMJto join at the last moment.\n\nShe and her family own 80% or so of Austrian media (Heute etc). She is describing program below. The plan would be that we arrive to Vienna on Thursday 17th mid day.\n\nOn Thursday there is a big Premiere of Mozart La Clemenza de Tito and we go to that.\n\nON Friday i: organizing a dinner/reception with her friends. We can schedule some other meetings/visits during day.\n\nOn Saturday the night starts at 5pm and goes through early next morning.\n\nI leave first flight Sunday morning for San Francisco to meet Bill. If you are staying in Vienna and have time (and like J you should go to her brunch.\n\nHow this seems to you???\n\nB"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032804.txt_6701
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032804.txt
subject: Re: Introduction
messages:
  [{"sender": "Melanie Walker", "recipients": ["Jeffrey - Neal"], "timestamp": "Sep 3, 2018, at 8:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Neither of you requires introduction. I've known Jeffrey 28 years and this isn't a joke - Donald Trump introduced us. I first met Neal in 16 years ago when Bob Pine introduced us Neal will be visiting NYC end of month. I think you would both enjoy spending time together - Thanks to you both for always supporting me. You are both copied."}, {"sender": "Neal Kassell", "recipients": ["Jeffery"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Thanks Melanie Jeffery — look forward to meeting you. Wish Melanie was with us. I will be in New York from Tuesday the 25th through Friday, 28 September. Let me know if you are available. Be well."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 3, 2018, at 8:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "yes, will be in town , coordiante a time closer . look forward to it"}, {"sender": "Neal Kassell", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/4/2018 12:50:33 AM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Will do Does Leslie do your schedule?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032353.txt_6707
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032353.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Erika Kellerhals"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I'm so sorry this happened to you. It's terrible. And sad."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Erika Kellerhals"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "its funny, dont lose your sense of humor"}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:19:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I'll try not to. Need to meet with you Tuesday."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033485.txt_6712
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033485.txt
subject: NYTimes: Decade in the Red: Trump Tax Figures Show Over $1 Billion in Business Losses
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2019 11:53:10 PM", "subject": "NYTimes: Decade in the Red: Trump Tax Figures Show Over $1 Billion in Business Losses", "body": "Here's a link from The New York Times that I thought you'd find interesting:\n\nNewly obtained tax information reveals that from 1985 to 1994, Donald J. Trump’s businesses were in far\nbleaker condition than was previously known.\n\nSee More...\n\nGet The New York Times on your mobile device"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032943.txt_6713
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032943.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "12/13/2016 1:48:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "btw, liked your fake news article"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I can't. With the Trump people today."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:40 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "michael can you do today at 12 instead of tomorw?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025812.txt_6715
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025812.txt
subject: Re: Shears Update
messages:
  [{"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Christina Galbraith", "Richard Kah"], "timestamp": "7/16/2014 5:56:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Shears Update", "body": "yes agree\n\nresult got worse with recent negative press, clinton, as we discussed\n\nwe were down to | negative (forbes) before that - Christina can confirm this.\n\nIt will get back to 1 and then 0 so long as negative things stop coming out. if new negative keeps coming out it\nreally dismantles much of our effort... especially when it involves an ex-president\n\nno excuses here i'm not pleased with where it is at and am still working to make it happen"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Shears Update", "body": "Results still very bad"}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 16, 2014", "subject": "Re: Shears Update", "body": "Hi Tyler,\nThe social media sites are constantly updated: LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, google +.\nI'll be in touch later today re: feature article.\n\nCould you put a site map into the Net site.? This helps rankings. Also could you add it to google analytics\nusing Jeffrey's gmail account? This allows me to monitor it's progress and index it periodically.\n\nI'll call you later. Thanks,\nChristina"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "Jul 16, 2014, at 12:01 PM", "subject": "Re: Shears Update", "body": "Christina,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031994.txt_6719
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031994.txt
subject: National Enquirer Comment Request Re: Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman Po", "recipients": ["Darren a Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "1/29/2015 8:33:35 PM", "subject": "FW: National Enquirer Comment Request Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Gonzalez, Patricia", "recipients": ["Tonja Haddad Coleman"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 29, 2015 3:29 PM", "subject": "National Enquirer Comment Request Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Tonja--\n\nThe National ENQUIRER is preparing to publish a story that Bill Clinton used a private \"orgy\" jet to travel to\nBrunei for an extraordinary dinner with a royal accused of duping American women into \"white slavery.\"\n\nThe ENQUIRER will report that Bill was accompanied by the 727's owner, billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein,\nwhen he landed in the tiny South-East Asian country on May 25, 2002. His entourage also included two\nwomen who allegedly worked as \"madams\" for Epstein, luring teenaged girls into sex trysts with the tycoon\nand his powerful and famous friends.\n\nAccording to The ENQUIRER's investigation, Bill spent the day playing golf at a seven-star hotel -- and then was\ninvited to dine with Brunei's sultan, Hassanal Bolkiah .....who was charged with holding a deeply-religious\nChristian beauty queen as a \"human chattel.\" Far from being embarrassed by the ruler’s tawdry\n\nreputation, moreover, records for Bill’s nonprofit foundation reveal that Brunei made a donation towards his\nClinton Presidential Library that year of between $1 million and $5 million.\n\nPlease kindly attempt to provide any comment by 4 pm ET tomorrow, Friday January 30th to Lachlan\n\nCartwright, Executive Editor, at EE [Office] 0 I."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031384.txt_6726
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031384.txt
subject: Fwd: Herald
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lilly Sanchez <lillysanchez@lslawfirm.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Herald", "body": "Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case\n\n[Article content about the case reassignment, Epstein plea deal, victims' rights, etc.]\n\nRead more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article227136459.html#storylink=cpy\n\nLilly Ann Sanchez\nThe LS Law Firm"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Scott J. Link", "Darren Indyke", "Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "3/5/2019 11:12:41 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Herald", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026834.txt_6728
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026834.txt
subject: TRUMP! POPE SCORECARD
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Dangene and Jennie Enterprise"], "timestamp": "2/19/2016 2:23:22 AM", "subject": "TRUMP! POPE SCORECARD", "body": "TRUMP 1 POPE\nEnterpriseworld\nCORE: Jennie Enterprise I"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031980.txt_6740
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031980.txt
subject: Fw: Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Michael S. Sitrick", "Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 4:41:04 PM", "subject": "Fw: Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek", "body": "----- Original Message -----\n\nFrom: Kristin Andersen\n\nSent: 03/08/2011 11:09 AM EST\n\nTo: Jay Lefkowitz\n\nSubject: Alexandra wolfe called from Newsweek\n\nPrivileged - Redacted\n\n----- Forwarded by Kristin Andersen/New\nYork/Kirkland-Ellis on 03/08/2011 11:05 AM -----\n\n“wolfe,\nAlexandra\nsi] To\n~ Lefkowitz\"\n\ncc\n03/07/201 Subject\n1 02:09 RE:\nPM\n\nDear Mr. Lefkowitz,\n\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein.\nwould he be available to answer any of these on the\nphone or by email? People have told me some of his\nthoughts on background but I wanted to see if he could\ntell me or email me anything directly I could use on\nthe record. Also I'd like to run the information I\nalready have by you or him.\n\nThank you,\nAlexandra\n\n-what is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending\nmore time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation?\nCould he talk about his interest in science and the\n2011 grants/conference?\n\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new\ndirection he's taking it? Does he still have the same\nclients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion?\n\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that\narranged? with whom was he working/advising?\n\n-where is he spending his time now? How has his social\nlife changed from three years ago?\n\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n\n-what were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions\nto his conviction?\n\n-what does he think about the sentence he got- was it\ntoo lenient or too harsh and why?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033491.txt_6743
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033491.txt
subject: Fwd: Photos
messages:
  [{"sender": "vic", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/7/2014 5:00:22 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Photos", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Lv ct", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 7, 2014 12:45 pm", "subject": "Fwd: Photos", "body": "Jeffrey,\nphotos of unmasked B727. Paint shop indicated we can use Vinyl for your \"E\" Logo and \"Flag\" as oppose of painting. this would enable easy removal if plane sells in the future. Trump and other airlines uses Vinyl for logos.\n\ncan you sketch the style of \"E\" for the tail, and I'll request rendering with slanted Flag for Right side of Vertical Stabilizer.\n\nthank you,\n\nLarry"}, {"sender": "Guy Anico", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun", "subject": "Photos", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032957.txt_6744
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032957.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler Si"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 4:35:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes . im afraid you are right"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmlcr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not to disturb you, but I am struck by the similar mannerisms between Trump and McGyver"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033059.txt_6746
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033059.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@dmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:11 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@dmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:53 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "told you"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@dmail.com]"], "timestamp": "On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with mueller?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@dmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 2:03 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "it also includes barrack, saying not is only donald crazy but hes stupid. SO MCH FUN"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 8:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "As usual you nailed it....tomorrow will be an interesting day"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 3:46:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "i tried a coupe of times"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025190.txt_6750
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025190.txt
subject: Fwd: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Just arrived NY, here for ~10 days.\nNow with the Trump-Xi Summit over (utterly overwhelmed by Syria strike), back to Closer To Truth.\nWhen good to meet?\n\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 23, 2017, at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Look forward to seeing you"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:54 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Hi: Just returned from a month in China. Attached is my summary of recent politics (in South China Morning\nPost), and pics of moderating (at request of govts of China and Israel) the PM’s discussion with leading\nChinese technologist (Baidu CEO, dominant Chinese search engine). The PM was in China for 25th\nanniversary of diplomatic relations\n\nBack to CTT, my ‘true love’... Love to discuss Science of Sleep & Dreams project. I’m in LA for week and\nthen NY April 8-18.\n\nWarm regards, Robert"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017, at 1:29 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "501 (c) (3) - private operating foundation - The Kuhn Foundation, which I set up in 1999 to support Closer To\nTruth. IRS letter attached.\nThank you.\n\n<Kuhn Foundation IRS Tax Exempt Determination Letter 1999, 2015.pdf>"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029291.txt_6754
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029291.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 6, 2018 3:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how does it feel to have the president of the united states. at camp david. focus on you.. ! ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 6, 2018 4:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I feel he truly must be off his rocker. Could there be a strategy here?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/6/2018 9:20:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "It looks to me as you might have driven him over the edge. DJT: 'I do things proper !!/ \" im really, like. \nsmart. !! sounds like elizas father- donald dolittle. . . or dopey donald or demented donald. as I told you his \nstatement from camp david was laced with \"he has made billions and billions of dollars. he is \nreportedly petrified that his bluff will be called. . His 100 million dollar plane he said be bought from paul \nallen, is really a 1991 boeing 757 previously used by a mexican airline. repainted . His- ladder capital \nfinance 11c, - ladder capital 1 finance 11c, deutsche bank trust co americas . chicago unit acquistion .( it \nsays \"springing loan\" over 50m -I never even heard of the term . as part of june 17 disclosure form he \nowes each more than 50 m apiece. but of course, not disclosed just -how much more. . declared the revenue \nof his real estate as INCOME without deducting expenses or taxes. all a sham"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033071.txt_6758
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033071.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:02 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "mcgann and mcmasters tried to resign"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:05 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "And...???? Trump stopped them? He cannot stand mcgahn"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "1/15/2018 3:17:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, he refused their resignations . so i am told."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032279.txt_6765
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032279.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 12, 2016, at 5:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://origin-nyi.thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/295423-bill-clintons-cia-chief-joins-trump-campaign"}, {"sender": "Soon Yi Previn <is>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/13/2016 11:04:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Woody said it doesn't mean anything."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031770.txt_6766
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031770.txt
subject: US special counsel's office: Trump ally Roger Stone arrested in Florida
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/25/2019 1:11:27 PM", "subject": "US special counsel's office: Trump ally Roger Stone arrested in Florida", "body": "https://www.cnbe.com/2019/01/25/us-special-counsels-office-trump-ally-roger-stone-arrested-in-florida.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031764.txt_6770
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031764.txt
subject:
  GOP fundraiser Broidy under investigation for alleged effort to sell government influence, people familiar with probe say - The Washington Post

messages:
  [{"sender": "Heberlig, Brian", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid", "Silverman, Nicholas"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 17, 2018 6:47 PM", "subject": "GOP fundraiser Broidy under investigation for alleged effort to sell government influence, people familiar with probe say - The Washington Post", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/gop-fundraiser-broidy-under-investigation-for-alleged-effort-to-sell-government-influence-people-familiar-with-probe-say/2018/08/17/c9e55792-a185-11e8-8e87-c869fe70a721_story.html?utm_term=.f7126cd4d51c\n\nGOP fundraiser Broidy under investigation\nfor alleged effort to sell government\ninfluence, people familiar with probe say\n\nCarol D. Leonnig\n\nThe Justice Department is investigating whether longtime Republican fundraiser Elliott\nBroidy sought to sell his influence with the Trump administration by offering to deliver U.S.\ngovernment actions for foreign officials in exchange for tens of millions of dollars,\naccording to three people familiar with the probe.\n\nAs part of the investigation, prosecutors are scrutinizing a plan that Broidy allegedly\ndeveloped to try to persuade the Trump government to extradite a Chinese dissident back to\nhis home country, a move sought by Chinese President Xi Jinping, according to two of the\npeople.\n\nThey are also investigating claims that Broidy sought $75 million from a Malaysian business\nofficial if the Justice Department ended its investigation of a development fund run by the\nMalaysian government. The Malaysian probe has examined the role of the former prime\nminister in the embezzlement of billions of dollars from the fund."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [aweingarten@...]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/18/2018 4:51:06 PM", "subject": "Fw: GOP fundraiser Broidy under investigation for alleged effort to sell government influence, people familiar with probe say - The Washington Post", "body": "Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029285.txt_6778
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029285.txt
subject:
  Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric

messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 5:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Your pal should stay out of press. \nPublic link to manafort will be a disaster. \nThis is a staggering shit show."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Summers"], "timestamp": "10/11/2017 3:15:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "he knows. , it is s000 crazy, and now reporting is quite inaccurate, but each reporter feels he needs to tell his \nversion, Im in paris if you want to chat"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029204.txt_6779
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029204.txt
subject: Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joi Ito <joiito@mit.edu>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 6:54 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "President Obama’s response to the Ukraine crisis, while derided by critics as slow and weak, has reinvigorated a 15-year global hunt for the Russian leader’s hidden wealth.\n\nhttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/27/world/sanctions-revive-search-for-secret-putin-fortune.html?smid=nytnow-share&smprod=nytnow"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Apr 27, 2014, at 04:41", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "ia you havetime"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito <joiito@mit.edu>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, April 27, 2014", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "Can you talk now?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Loi Ito"], "timestamp": "4/27/2014 6:58:54 PM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "Please use my alternative address Mo avoid email auto responder"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031002.txt_6784
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031002.txt
subject: Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rush, George [rush.george@nydailynews.com]", "recipients": ["Howard Rubenstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 08, 2009 11:08 PM", "subject": "Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Howard:\n\nWe’re working on a story for our Sunday column about Jeffrey Epstein. I thought I might send my questions to you tonight, so you’d have them first thing tomorrow."}, {"sender": "Howard Rubenstein", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "October 9, 2009 7:26:54 AM PDT", "subject": "FW: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Darren:\nI hope you are well.\n\nSince we are no longer working for Jeffrey, I’m forwarding this Daily News request to you so you can handle it as you see fit.\n\nMany thanks,\n\nHoward"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger", "Robert D. Critton"], "timestamp": "10/9/2009 4:52:57 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032980.txt_6792
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032980.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 3:30 PM -0800", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Who will represent Acosta at hearings"}, {"sender": "Roy Black <a>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 1:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He will be by himself. Perhaps a trump administration aide to assist and accompany him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid as"], "timestamp": "2/19/2017 12:31:38 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026466.txt_6794
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026466.txt
subject: Re: Keep the March Alive!
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/24/2018 11:35:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Keep the March Alive!", "body": "happy to help. but I thought by colorful past might be more of a burden with re conribtuions."}, {"sender": "Diane Ziman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Keep the March Alive!", "body": "Jeffrey --\n\nDid you see my son’s email on Sunday?\n\nI was so proud to see him speak at the Women’s March this weekend, joining thousands of\npassionate Floridians who want real change in our state, and across the country.\n\nBut we both know that change doesn’t come easy. And there are a lot of folks in Tallahassee\nthat want to keep things the same as usual.\n\nWe can’t afford the status quo so they can have their way. We need leadership that will\nbring the change that so many have been marching for over the past year.\n\nCan I count on you to help my son bring that change to Tallahassee?\n\nClick here to join his campaign today, and help him do the right thing for our\nneighbors across the state.\n\n#ThatsMyBoy\n\n- Diane"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032390.txt_6799
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032390.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 15, 2016 8:53 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "??"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 3:54:53 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "I'm stuck in the cold! Five degrees. Aspen next week to warm up. Tilerson is a good move for Trump. Have gotten to \nknow him at CSIS, he's the real deal. \ntjp"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031347.txt_6801
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031347.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:04 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "About 40,700,000 results (0.21 seconds)\nSearch Results\n1. Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia  \nen.wilopedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey Epstein \nWikipedia \nJeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953) is an American financier and science and education \nphilanthropist. He worked at Bear Stearns early in his ... \nLife - Financial career - Science funding - Solicitation of prostitution \n2. Jeffrey Epstein: Sex Offender, Yes. Billionaire, No. - Forbes  \nwww.forbes.com/.../jeffrey-epstein-sex-offender-yes-bil... \nForbes \nby Clare O'Connor - in 138 Google+ circles  \nFeb 28, 2011 - The pervert of Palm Beach is back in the news, and back to being described as a \n\"billionaire\". Here's why he's not. \n3. Jeffrey Epstein Philanthropy: Overview  \nwwwjeffreyepstein.org/ \nJeffrey Epstein Philanthropy supports innovative research and programs in science, medicine, education and \ninternational affairs. \n4. Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation - New York, NY - Medical & Health ...  \nhttps://www.facebook.com/jeffreyepsteinvifoundation \nJeffrey Epstein VI Foundation, New York, NY. 27 likes • 1 talking about this. The Jeffrey Epstein VI \nFoundation was founded in 2000 by Jeffrey Epstein to sponsor ... \n5. Jeff Epstein profiles I LinkedIn  \nwww.linkedin.com/pub/dir/Jeff/Epstein \nView the profiles of professionals named Jeff Epstein on LinkedIn. There are 25 professionals named Jeff \nEpstein, who use LinkedIn to exchange information, ... \n6. Dr. Jeffrey M. Epstein, MD - Babylon, NY - Neurosurgery ...  \nwww.healthgrades.com New York (NY) Babylon  \nHealthGrades \nRating: 4.3 - 6 reviews \nVisit Healthgrades for information on Dr. Jeffrey M. Epstein, MD. Find Phone & Address information, \nmedical practice history, affiliated hospitals and more. \n7. Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator I New ...  \nnvpost.com/.../billionaire-jeffrey-epstein-im-a-... \nNew York Post \nby Amber Sutherland  \nFeb 25, 2011 - Billionaire pervert Jeffrey Epstein is back in New York City — and making wisecracks \nabout his just-ended jail stint for having sex with an ... \n8. Woody Allen spotted with convicted child sex-offender Jeffrey ...  \nwww.dailymail.co.uk/.../Woody-Allen-spotted-convicted-chil... \nDaily Mail \nSep 24, 2013 - Woody Allen has been spotted strolling on New York's Upper East Side with millionaire child \nsex-offender Jeffrey Epstein, who served time for ... \n9. Jeffrey Epstein: International Moneyman of Mystery  \nnymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n 7912/ \nNew York Magazine \nHe's pals with a passel of Nobel Prize—winning scientists, CEOs like Leslie Wexner of the Limited, socialite \nGhislaine Maxwell, even Donald Trump. But it wasn't ... \n10. Jeffrey Epstein 'kept a diary of his under-aged victims' - Telegraph  \nwww.telegraph.co.uk ) ... >North America ) USA  \nThe Daily Telegraph \nMar 5, 2011 - The Duke of York's billionaire paedophile friend kept a secret journal, described as \"The Holy \nGrail\" by lawyers, which listed his alleged ..."}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "1/24/2014 8:20:13 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Mr. Epstein, \nWe currently have two negatives on first page in Google but one is at 6th and the other at 7th. (Universal \nsearch, no history applied). Results will be very different if that PC has been used to click or search any of the \nresults and has not been cleared. \nHow did you pull the results you just sent? \nUsing Google Chrome + InCognito Mode + Clearing Browser Cache = only reliable reporting. I can help set \nyou up with this. Screenshot here of results using above method - http://i.imgur.com/tfGN3Zi.png. This is the \ntrue representation of what your average searcher will find (statistically, most searches will be from users whom \nhave not clicked on your negative articles before) \nMuch progress has been made since we spoke - premium placements are getting secured over next week, \nhundreds of links have been built to your primary sites and the first movements are kicking in today (NYMag \nmoved up to 4th a few hours ago). We still have confidence we are on the right track and doing everything we \ncan to get this cleaned up - another 45 days should be enough to have a clean first page based on what has been \ndone. \nPS - The foundation site was just hacked and I'm in the process of fixing that today. You can actually see it in \nthe screenshot above (it reads Cash Advance advertisement in the short-description). This is something a \nprevious company deployed but we are now going through and securing the rest of the domains to prevent basic \nhijacks like this. \nI'm free on my cell for next few hours."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030491.txt_6813
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030491.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but iam already getting sick of so many meetings!\n\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has\n\nsome questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends ,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025332.txt_6821
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025332.txt
subject: Using CRISPR to resurrect the dead
messages:
  [{"sender": "editorialstaff@flipboard.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/20/2019 7:34:52 PM", "subject": "Using CRISPR to resurrect the dead", "body": "Interesting stories worth your time.\n\nPlus, facts about the summer solstice and the 54 books of the new adventure library."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033334.txt_6827
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033334.txt
subject: POTUS
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/14/2018 8:38:47 AM", "subject": "POTUS", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nTrump is expected to be in PBI\nDec 21st -Jan 6th\n\nFrom Atlantic Aviaiton:\nFor your planning purposes, please be advised that PBI is expecting a Presidential TFR from December\n21% until January 6\". As of this moment."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026985.txt_6833
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026985.txt
subject: How To Academy
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/25/2019 8:15:05 AM", "subject": "How To Academy", "body": "The Battle for Turkey / Day of the Jackal's Frederick Forsyth / New Yorker essayist Daniel Mendelsohn / superstar tenor lan Bostridge\n\nView in browser\n\nNewsletter June 2019\n\nwww.howtoacademy.com\n\n10.09.2019\n\nErdogan Rising: The Battle for the Soul of Turkey\n\nMore than 15 years before Trump ascended to the presidency, Turkey was the crucible for the new, authoritarian populism shaking the globe. Now, as elections in Istanbul suggest support for Erdogan's regime may be crumbling, Times correspondents Hannah Lucinda Smith and Antony Loyd turn to the future of Turkey's ailing democracy - and consider the lessons for the rest of the world.\n\nREAD MORE"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032292.txt_6838
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032292.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "4:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "4:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Lets catch up next time you are in NYC. NYT is making me write more on markets now and I don't really know who to believe any more re where the market is going these days."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "4:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no place else to invest for alpha, your children are rich"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "4:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "If you knew Trump was going to win, how would you position your portfolio?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "4:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "give me a number ill call"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:56:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026314.txt_6840
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026314.txt
subject: Re: Steve Bannon had morning with disgraced Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peter Thomas Roth iii", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, August 12 2018 05:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon had morning with disgraced Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Aug 12, 2018, at 1:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon had morning with disgraced Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "fun"}, {"sender": "Peter Thomas Roth", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 1:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon had morning with disgraced Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Great picture of you!!!\n\nhttps://pagesix.com/2018/08/11/steve-bannon-trying-to-get-on-disgraced-jeffrey-epsteins-good-side/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=pagesixdaily&utm_content=20180812&mpweb=755-7237853-719173670\n\nSteve Bannon trying to get on disgraced\nJeffrey Epstein’s good side\n\nBy Emily Smith\n\nSteve Bannon shared a secret meeting with reviled billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein\nat the financier’s notorious Upper East Side mansion."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032384.txt_6847
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032384.txt
subject: Fwd: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Afri zp", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "November 29, 2016 at 3:26:13 AM GMT-3:30", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Larry, \nI'll be very please to meet or take you for diner. My mobile in Doha is +97455125119"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["karim"], "timestamp": "Le 29 nov. 2016 a 00:16", "subject": "Re:", "body": "larry, karim, karim - larry, larry will be in doha on wed, i think you two would enjoy meeting"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/29/2016 7:34:18 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Who is the guy you have set me up with? \nSpend zero effort on anything about me w trump. Seeing his approach to conflict of interest, his Putin \nproximity, and his mindless response on Castro death I'm best off a million miles away. \nUntil they are deeply humbled by the fuckups that are sure to come, I serve myself and country best by doing \nnothing that involves loyalty to them."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023229.txt_6853
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023229.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "PLEASE READ CAREFULLY ,\nMark was here this morning , the proposed transactions are extremely complex . and would take a great\ndeal of detailed time. I do not know how, and if ,to move forward - our last transaction. a transaction\nwhich you saved 600 million in tax. even if as you say it could be 20 years away , ( 1 hope longer)\ndiscounted to today is a savings of 300 million . for some reason you chose to ignore our agreements ,\nverbal written and emailed -and decided that it was only worth 8 million dollars to you. . ( assuming\nphaidon -richard happens. the calculation that you can see isa 24m savings not including artspace and\ndebt benefits- certain to come later .. IMPORTANT NOTE\n\nthe phaidon transaction as currently contemplated will not work . NOT CLOSE\n\nWhen we had our meeting in your home in Bedford. You asked me for my help. I told you multiple\ntimes that i thought it was a very bad idea, in that I greatly preferred to have no financial interactions. I\ndon't have many friends and didn't want money in any way to interfere with our unique relationship.\nReminder, For five years you had the kind, but very goofy Eileen Alexandersson as the sole manager of\nyour massive accounting , legal, investments. reporting, trusts etc. When I first told you in no uncertain\nterms that I firmly believed she was incompetent you admonished me for \" speaking out of both sides of\nmy mouth\". With regard Brad Wechsler , there has never been a \" both sides. \". I have consistantly\nmaintained since day one that he was highly unsuited for the job. When you initially asked me to help\nconvince him to take the role , promising him a position to manage mirage investments I sent you a note\nsaying that instead of hiring him you should pay up and get first class people. I have reiterated the same\nmessage for over a year now. . Brad , not me ,was tasked with hiring new people , according to his biz\nschool org chart.(nauseating ) and as you wanted him to take ownership of the staff,he conducted many\ninterviews alone. . you may recall that as late as may, you told him in my presence that though six months\nhad passed he had not hired anyone. since then I have rectified errors in sales tax, use tax, income tax,\nfbar reporting, 1031 reporting, 8 million of deductions missed errors of millions on the returns. a cashflow\nthat is misleading helped prepare financial statements ( april ) Oversight on new grats- first at 22 and\nthen at 19 that were done without my consultation and were \"resolved\" soley as a result of my last\nminute intervention. . 600 million in after tax savings was just accomplished. (BTW- for some reason you\nleft the 30 million outstanding that I had said should only be done\" if\" that was my additional fee. and not\nused for non biz purposes and not art.\n\nSorry but .,\n\nin June and then again Sept, we both agreed to a 50% of phaidon payout first projected at 20 . but less\nwhen artspace and debt taken out, - then only after weeks, when you delayed any detailed discussion of\nmoney wanting to give the issue a thoughtful response ( which I fully understand ) . you unilaterally\nchanged our agreement.. 5m would be reserved for the future ? . and out of the remaining 15m ,? 1\nwould receive only a third. ( note : I'm confident that both the debt , and the art space investment will also\nlead to a write- off of another 30 m. plus ) In my dining room ,you were surprised when I said that 1\nrequire most people to pay their advisory fee up front so that I am assured that I will be properly\ncompensated for my work when strategies are implemented . you may recall that you appeared offended\nand said \" are you suggesting that i would go back on my word\" I said no , of course not ! you are my\nclosest of friends ,but my experience is that when amounts get large, people tend to get unhappy when it\nactually comes time for them to pay.\n\nI include below the email i sent to you on April 15, the day i was examining your returns It laid out\nmy understanding of the compensation agreed for a transaction of the magnitude to the penny of the one\njust completed.ie 600m When it appeared that the transcation would and could go foward I was the"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032994.txt_6854
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032994.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joshua Cooper Ramo"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 00:46", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you playing a part in the xi trump. fun"}, {"sender": "Joshua Cooper Ramo", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "In Europe. You well?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joshua Cooper Ramo"], "timestamp": "4/10/2017 10:41:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Very"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030703.txt_6857
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030703.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Feb 8, 2018, 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "this bill has the things you were looking for in the last"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:52 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Goofy corrupt giveaways?\nDo tell."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Feb 9, 2018, at 6:28 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "WOW"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:32 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "?? What number r u at?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:06 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Lisa will call.\nPeople are saying resignation of justice Dept number 3 is big deal."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Feb 10, 2018, at 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "The list of officials frequently discussed in the texts who are no longer in their jobs seems to grow by the day. It includes former FBI Director James Comey, who was fired by Trump; former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe; Comey's chief of staff, James Rybicki; FBI General Counsel James Baker; as well as Strzok, who was booted off the special counsel investigation and sent to a job in the FBI's personnel div. laufman and rachel brand. not one surprise if would have heard bannon"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/10/2018 5:20:54 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Saw and liked Woody piece. The columnist is Good.\nDon't follow your note. What texts"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026161.txt_6861
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026161.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jack LANG", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/17/2017 8:48:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You were spot on, Jeffrey!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Le 10 juil. 2017 a 23:17", "subject": "re trump. as i said they will first go after his family", "body": "re trump. as i said they will first go after his family"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032764.txt_6862
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032764.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 10, 2018, at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump will problably hire dershowitz,, no joke"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/10/2018 1:20:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes agree\nseems like dershowitz has been interviewing for that job for last 2 months on fox news.."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023201.txt_6864
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023201.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jul 29, 2017, at 6:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wash this week. what time see apt"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/29/2017 10:28:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "This week was totally bananas. Did Andrea Mitchell yesterday to discuss Trump/DOJ.\nApartment appointment is Aug. 2 at 4 pm."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026775.txt_6867
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026775.txt
subject: Sexual harassment and Lawrence Krauss
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peter Aldhous, PhD\nScience reporter | BuzzFeed News", "recipients": ["Sam Harris"], "timestamp": "Dec 11, 2017, at 10:38 AM", "subject": "Sexual harassment and Lawrence Krauss", "body": "FYI\n\nVirginia Hughes submitted a message to the Sam Harris Contact Publicist Contact form on Mon, December 11,\n2017 - 7:37 am.\n\nName:\nEmail:\nSubject:\nMessage:\n\nVirginia Hughes\n\nSexual harassment and Lawrence Krauss\nHi,\n\nWe are journalists at BuzzFeed News, reporting an investigation about sexual harassment\nallegations against Lawrence Krauss between 2006 to 2016.\n\nMuch of the story revolves around his conduct in the skeptics movement, and about how skeptic\norganizations — particularly CFI — have handled complaints about his behavior.\n\nWe wanted to give you — as a leader of the atheist movement and one of Krauss’s collaborators —\nthe opportunity to comment on these allegations.\n\nWe plan to publish on Tuesday morning. Let us know soon if you'd like to comment.\n\nGinny Hughes, Peter Aldhous, Azeen Ghorayshi"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029534.txt_6871
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029534.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Mohammed Waheed Hassan"], "timestamp": "Jan 9, 2013, at 6:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how is it shaping up? what are the biggest hurdles."}, {"sender": "Mohamed Waheed Hassan", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Jan 10, 2013 at 11:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi,\n\nThe campaign team is starting to come together. We are continuing discussions with Jim and tomorrow we will meet him face to face on skype. We will brief him on the situation here so that he will be able to advice us more effectively. Already he has sent some very useful suggestions and we are working on them. Getting the right people to head various aspects on the campaign is difficult here but we should be able to pull the team together shortly.\n\nWe will need some more help from Ian and Rory because we are still weak on international communication. Some old negative stuff keeps coming up in the Guardian newspaper in England. But most of the international media is not paying much attention to Maldives right now.\n\nI have asked Rory to help find a full time communications guy to stay here for about a year to work with me. He doesn't have to be an expert, just a good graduate student would do. Some really positive stuff is also happening now and we need the world to know about them.\n\nWorld Energy Forum and CGI guys are here. I am meeting Clinton people in a few minutes.\n\nI have some funding now but will ask all friends to help raise more later when things start happening in full swing. Election is now scheduled to early September.\n\nHope all is well and look forward to seeing you here in the not too distant future.\n\nWarm regards,\nWaheed"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Mohamed Waheed Hassan"], "timestamp": "Jan 17, 2013, at 7:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my friend in sweden, lisa svensson, would be perfect as your right hand orgainzing your team„ she has diplomaitc experieince and is currently amabssador to the oceans for sweden"}, {"sender": "Mohamed Waheed Hassan", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi,\n\nWould be great if Lisa could visit us. She sounds like the right person to help us get organized.\n\nMaldives just got elected Vice President of International Renewable Energy Agency. We are also Vice Chair of the UN Human Rights Council. Not too bad considering we had so much bad coverage this year internationally.\n\nBest regards,\nWaheed"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Mohamed Waheed Hassan"], "timestamp": "18 January, 2013 2:40 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "also be advised that thorbjorn jagland is a great friend."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I remember meeting Jagland at your place when I came with Sultan."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Mohamed Waheed Hassan"], "timestamp": "Jan 18, 2013, at 5:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "as chairman of the council of europe , he is really mr human rights, Im sure that if he can be of help, he will"}, {"sender": "Mohamed Waheed Hassan", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nNeed your advice.\n\nMy finance minister is telling me that he has an anonymous funds manager who is willing to deposit 4 billion dollars in Maldives and that they are willing to lend a percentage of that in exchange for government promissory notes. The 4 billion would be deposited in the Central Bank. But they want us to set up a special purpose vehicle, a construction company fully owned by the government to receive the loan. Such a company can only be set up under a presidential decree.\n\nI am also told that the funds manager would be charging Maldives upfront a certain percentage of the amount lent.\n\nI don't feel I have enough information on this. I don't know who is this funds manager. They always want the finance minister to meet them in Bangkok or some place outside. Why would anyone want to deposit such a large amount here when we don't have a credit rating and public debt is so high. I feel very uncomfortable about this.\n\nWhat do you think I should do. I am very uncomfortable. In addition to the finance minister, a leading politician and leader of the coalition parliamentary group is behind it. He could be my leading contender for presidency.\n\nDoes this sound all ridiculous to you. I have a strange feeling about this whole thing.\n\nBest regards\nWaheed"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Mohamed Waheed"], "timestamp": "Jan 27, 2013, at 9:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "this from a fraud web site, your mimister will get upset that you dont want to at least try, what do we have to lose , always the pitch. THe following from the fraud site. --The essential fact in all advance-fee fraud operations is that the promised money transfer never happens—because the money does not exist. The perpetrators rely on the fact that, by the time the victim realizes this (often only after being confronted by a third party who has noticed the transactions or conversation and recognized the scam), the victim may have sent thousands of dollars of their own money, and sometimes thousands or millions more that has been borrowed or stolen, to the scammer via an untraceable and/or irreversible means such as wire transfer.f131 Stay away, however if you want to embarass your possible opponent , you might set it up so that he looks like a fool, ask for amemo of why he thinks you should agree, have it include as many detials as possible, so that when you prove its a fraud„ you will make him look very silly as opposed to his saying , you missed an opportunity, anyway„ glad you are well"}, {"sender": "Mohamed Waheed [mohamedwaheed@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/27/2013 4:33:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you. You are my savior. I will do exactly what you said."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026607.txt_6872
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026607.txt
subject: Fwd: Breaking News: Obama to Nominate Loretta Lynch as U.S. Attorney General
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/8/2014 1:20:15 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Breaking News: Obama to Nominate Loretta Lynch as U.S. Attorney General", "body": "Importance: High\n\nSent from my iPhone\n\nBegin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "NYTimes.com News Alert <nytdirect@nytimes.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "November 7, 2014 at 6:06:16 PM EST", "subject": "Breaking News: Obama to Nominate Loretta Lynch as U.S. Attorney General", "body": "BREAKING NEWS Friday, November 7, 2014 6:04 PM EST\n\nObama to Nominate Loretta Lynch as U.S. Attorney General\n\nPresident Obama will nominate Loretta E. Lynch, the top federal prosecutor in Brooklyn, to succeed Eric H. Holder Jr. as attorney general, people close to the process said Friday.\n\nIf confirmed, she would be the first African-American woman to serve as the nation's top law enforcement official.\n\nShe would also be a rare instance of Mr. Obama's reaching outside his inner circle to fill a crucial post.\n\nREAD MORE »\nhttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/08/us/politics/lorettadynch-eric-holder-attorney-general.html?emc=edit_na_20141107"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022230.txt_6875
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022230.txt
subject: Re: Results
messages:
  [{"sender": "Al seckel [alseckel@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/16/2010 1:31:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "Conshita is very media savy, as you ate probably well aware. She knows exactly what we are doing, and is taking her own counter-measures, but it is constant wack-a-mole with her."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Al seckel"], "timestamp": "Thu, December 16, 2010 5:20:13 AM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "over the weekend."}, {"sender": "Al seckel", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "My initial estimate, given to me by Pablos, was 25, and that was based solely on his quick look at the situation, and not knowing what was really out there. In fact, as I have repeated many times, the job was far far worse that originally expected, you have a dedicated group of people trying to undo and damage you, including now, they have started up in the last week full force again, as it is obvious that they can't fux with your wiki page any more as we blocked that.. The woman from the Daily Beast. We have programs that track this stuff, and so, for the past few days, Mike has been having a cyber war with her minions, who are actively trying to undo what we are doing, as she is trying to push her Daily beast and other articles back up. So, we have to go back and push them back down.\n\nThen, there was the issue of trying to create additionally on you a positive web presence, with the science and org sites.\n\nI spend literally four months of non-stop work, creativity, and my own political capital to getyou this so far, which saved you not only time, but countless dollars, and isn't something that can be readily bought. I had people working also for free. I gained access to information that standard seo companies don't have. In addition, I wasted a lot of time talking to people who promise to help, but end up providing nothing, and so, I end up having to do it myself. What do I get in return, constant back slapping to my head...\n\nWe were trying to fix up your mess. I didn't create it. Just thought it would be something to help. This was NEVER about trying to pull money out of you, and fact, we have don't everything possible to keep the costs down considerably.\n\nI must talk to you about the island thing asap. When can we do that?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Al seckel"], "timestamp": "Thu, December 16, 2010 5:01:25 AM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "I was never told never, that there was a 10k fee per month,, you inittaly said the project would take 20.. then another 10. then another 10. ."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033308.txt_6882
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033308.txt
subject: Trump Could Make the Deal of His Life and Defeat Clinton - Yahoo Finance
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/9/2016 8:14:10 AM", "subject": "Trump Could Make the Deal of His Life and Defeat Clinton - Yahoo Finance", "body": "http://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-could-deal-life-defeat-090000096.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032770.txt_6886
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032770.txt
subject: Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 6:43 PM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Apr 14, 2018, at 8:27 PM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": "Talk tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/15/2018 12:33:37 AM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": "Yup"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023215.txt_6889
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023215.txt
subject: Fee
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:39 PM", "subject": "Fee", "body": "Amount ? Paid in kind ? Financed ? Plane ?Paid to ? Non charity , charity . Fixed dates"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:05 PM", "subject": "Fee", "body": "please re iterate that no further actions taken without careful document review. please"}, {"sender": "Leon", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Fee", "body": "As you are well aware, There is little I won't do for you, or at least try to do as a friend, and a great\ndeal that I have already done ( both known and some things that willneed to remain unknown.) Our\narrangement was for me to architect sophisticated structures that would be beneficial to you. that is what\nI have done and will continue do in order to fulfill my obligations under our agreement. The\ndiscovered fact that you in reality need an entire family office built from scratch has been trying I have\naleady agreed de- facto to try to help. I would suggest that Phaidons payroll and attention pales in\nimportance to your personal structure,which has taken a back seat, Some of = my suggestions regarding\nthe Eystum office are as follows you will need a budget of 3- 5 million per year. CEO 1 million, new\ntax person to work with rich, 250. new bookkeeper ,200 new paralegal to work with ADA ALan etc ,\ncoordinating with Apollo, Akin , paul weiss , new acct openings , sec filings , sales tax review, etc.\n$150. art point person. loan , inventory, purchasing support, $?? software servers. video conferencing,\ntax oversight.\n\nI believe You should rapidly address trustees , gift trust, succesion, wills of debra and children, ,\nmonetization events , cash flow. etc I can ofcourse share my experiences with you on each issue.\n\nWIth regard the more pressing issue I am uncertain of just how to proceed. I am torn, as my very\nstrong inclination is not to be involved at all . It is extremely time consuming, delicate, fraught with many\npitfall many that will make you very upset and a major pain in the ass. I wrote you months ago that the\nquality of the people involved need to be upgraded. ( lucky for me these last issues arose way before the\nbegining of my involvement ) Iam also aware however of my overarching friendship obligations of ok, -\ngiven all the complexities who else can do it? problem.\n\nYour family office needs a daddy. children with good intentions are running around , sniping , nitpicking\nwith little direction. As a stopgap measure I am suggesting , we put in Larry Delson to take charge\nEveryone would report to him. eileen included. He would however work for me. this is not, by a long\nshot my first choice as I prefer only being responsible and standing behind my own personal work (ie\nthe word DONE will no longer be transmitted to reflect status stated by others )\n\nWith no commitment on my part whatsoever, to do it. So far as I have failed in my attempt in trying to\nthink through the problem creatively . My organizations handling of the more complex isssues I believe\nyou might find very costly, very ! ( however many structures available some risk sharing, maybe risk caps\n,etc ) but would require my teams doing the work , not yours. Ada should be only a trust, grat\nadministrator. not sure what role you prefer for Eileen as you hired her initially to oversee investments.\nwhether Rich your controller stays or not, is not urgent. having Tom report to a new person.- is."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Fee", "body": "and you and I can kibbitz about it all. structures outcomes risk, museums. charity, ( joslins answer by\nthe way was I had asked how much charity was leon planining to give this year , (the 2m) _ he didnt\ninclude your foundation or the payment to me, or from debra and you??!!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030717.txt_6891
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030717.txt
subject: Re: hey
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 19, 2018 1:49 PM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "How are you doing?\nA while back you mentioned that you were prediabetic. Has anything changed with that?\nWhat is your boy Donald up to now?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, March 19, 2018 2:15 PM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "All good. Bannon with me"}, {"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 4:32 AM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "Ask him if Putin has the photos of Trump blowing Bubba?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 21, 2018, at 09:37", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "and i thought- I had tsuris"}, {"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/21/2018 1:54:31 PM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "You and your boy Donnie can make a remake of the movie Get Hard.\nSent via tin can and string."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029246.txt_6894
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029246.txt
subject: Re: Poetry Update and Thank You
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New <lisanew@harvard.edu>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:31 AM", "subject": "Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "I'm in Cambridge sat?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 2 December 2015", "subject": "Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "That's ideal. Larry's away and I'll be working all day. I'm free any time."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Dec 2, 2015, at 12:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "Do you know Chomsky, he Is with me"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "On Wednesday, 2 December 2015", "subject": "Re: Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "did you want to send the below to Lisa? (or have me ask her?)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "12/2/2015 5:58:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "I'd like to speak to her"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033139.txt_6897
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033139.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "12/20/2018 12:09:41 PM", "subject": null, "body": "you might want to tell your dem friends that treating trump like a mafia don, ignores the fact that he has great \ndangerous power. . tightening the noose too slowly, risks a very bad situation. . gambino was never the \ncommander in chief there was little gambino could do as the walls closed in. not so with this maniac"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030688.txt_6898
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030688.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how was it.? why dont you stop by today so we can script tomorrow. - assuming no change. . prefer no details on email"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 1:42:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031596.txt_6901
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031596.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump. Because of this.\n\n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life.\"\n\nThat story will never die."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 9:51:09 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "read the uzz feed re my airplane logs and hawain tropic contest. / have them ask my houseman about donad almost walking through the door leaving his nose print on the glass as young women were swimming in the pool and he was so focused he walked straight into the door"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032457.txt_6902
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032457.txt
subject: P.S.
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner ii", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Nancy Cain"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 12:34:24 AM", "subject": "P.S.", "body": "I neglected to mention the importance of ACLU attorneys who have been receiving donations of many\nmillions to aid their actions such as impeaching Trump based on breaking his oath of the affirmation of\nthe constitution..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033297.txt_6909
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033297.txt
subject: Trump says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia!!
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayern", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/2/2016 9:25:10 PM", "subject": "Trump says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia!!", "body": "Donald Trump says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia\n\nClinton attacks Trump's foreign policy as ‘dangerously incoherent’ 1 /27U.S. Democratic presidential candidate\nHillary Clinton lambasted Donald Trump's foreign policy platform as \"dangerously incoherent\" in a speech on\nThursday that cast her Republican rival as both a dangerous and laughable figure.\n\nA former U.S. secretary of state, Clinton attacked Trump for his policies and his character, suggesting Trump\nmight start a nuclear war if elected to the White House simply because \"someone got under his very thin skin.\"\n\"Donald Trump's ideas are not just different, they are dangerously incoherent,” she said to a room of supporters\nin San Diego, California. \"They're not even really ideas, just a series of bizarre rants, personal feuds and\noutright lies.”\n\n© Mike Blake U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton delivers a speech on national\nsecurity in San Diego, California, United States June 2, 2016.\n\nClinton, the front-runner in the race to become the Democratic presidential nominee, delivered her speech as\nshe seeks to shift her attention to the Nov. 8 election against likely rival Trump and away from Bernie Sanders,\na U.S. senator from Vermont, who is continuing his longshot bid for the nomination.\n\nTrump, the Republicans’ presumptive nominee, has said he would sit down with North Korean leader Kim Jong\nUn to try to stop Pyongyang's nuclear program and has criticized the decades-old NATO alliance with mainly\nEuropean nations as obsolete and too costly for the United States.\n\nClinton derided these and other positions, promising she would do a better job keeping the United States safe\nand standing in front of a backdrop of 19 large U.S. flags, an unusual abundance even by the standards of\npresidential campaign events.\n\nTrump, a billionaire businessman who has never held elected office or worked in government before, says he\nhas experience dealing with foreign governments through setting up hotels, resorts, golf courses and beauty\npageants in foreign countries. Clinton, who is also a former U.S. senator and former first lady, mocked this.\n\"He says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia,\" she said to loud\nlaughter.\n\nTrump has talked tough on foreign policy. He has said he would bring back waterboarding and other brutal\ninterrogation techniques for terrorism suspects that are widely regarded as torture and were discontinued by\nDemocratic President Barack Obama.\n\nHe has also vowed to renegotiate trade deals, called for a temporary ban on Muslims entering the country, and\nsaid he would ask members of the 28-nation NATO alliance to \"pay up” or \"get out.”\n\nTrump has criticized Clinton for her handling of foreign policy during her 2009-2013 stint as foreign secretary,\nincluding the Sept. 11, 2012, attack by Islamist militants on a U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya, that\nkilled the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.\n\nHe cites Clinton's support for the Iraq war - launched by former Republican President George W. Bush - as\nanother example of her shortcomings.\n\nAta rally Wednesday night in Sacramento, California, Trump said he had seen a copy of Clinton's speech and\n\"it was such lies about my foreign policy.\""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032331.txt_6916
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032331.txt
subject: Re: JE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/4/2016 10:16:32 PM", "subject": "Re: JE", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Nov 4, 2016, at 6:15 PM", "subject": "JE", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Miller, Micha", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:14 PM", "subject": "JE", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032541.txt_6918
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032541.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 8, 2017, at 7:03 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "hope things are well. . when are you back. . I would love to do something with you, but sleep is not going to \nbe it. . I have read quite alot and frankly, the subject is fascinating but i see no real insights, just more \nquestions and mostly the same ones that have been asked for years. . yes, its role in many processes are now \nbecoming apparent. but I see no theories that can hold their own ( yet )."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/9/2017 3:39:07 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Appreciate consideration. I'm next in NY June 7 (for about a week); love to brainstorm.... I too would really \nlike to do something (important) together. \nJust arrived in Beijing for the \"The Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation\" (commentating), the \nsecond most important event of 2017 in China (after the upcoming Party Congress), but Western media not \npaying much attention, what with All-Things-Trump."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032325.txt_6921
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032325.txt
subject: Re: Election Update
messages:
  [{"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/4/2016 1:07:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Election Update", "body": "Trump is definitely winning popular vote so far. According to our data winning chances of Trump are 52% in Electoral college."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 4, 2016, at 5:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Election Update", "body": "thats in the popular vote , not talking into account the elctoral college?"}, {"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 1:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Election Update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\nAccording to InsightsPod Trump is more popular. We processed 3 million tweets this week.\nI have attached detailed report.\n\nRegards,\nZubair"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 9, 2016, at 4:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Election Update", "body": "jeevacation"}, {"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Election Update", "body": "What is your Skype ID?\nThanks."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, 8 October 2016", "subject": "Re: Election Update", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 7:07 AM", "subject": "Re: Election Update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nAre you available to talk today?\n\nRegards,\nZubair"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 6, 2016, at 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re: Election Update", "body": "skyype good this weekend?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032555.txt_6923
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032555.txt
subject: Re: Kuhn
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Disappointed to miss in NY - I'm here until August —11 if your schedule changes.\nTiming for Breakthrough series? Appreciate for planning purposes.\nLatest China -\nQ&A on US-China, China risks - http://www.atimes.com/article/us-china-talks-no-trade-war-xi-trump-\nbromance-cools/\nBeijing Meeting - http://www.scio.gov.cn/32618/Document/1558546/1558546.htm"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 22, 2017, at 1:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "we can skype or phone , ready when you are re breakthrough"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/22/2017 7:29:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Great. When's good - Skype/FaceTime/phone? Time Zone?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033283.txt_6926
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033283.txt
subject: Connolly digging into Trump and you...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2016 9:05:31 PM", "subject": "Connolly digging into Trump and you...", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025291.txt_6930
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025291.txt
subject: Bill Clinton identified in lawsuit against pedophile Jeffrey Epstein I Daily Mail Online
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/14/2015 11:56:48 PM", "subject": "Bill Clinton identified in lawsuit against pedophile Jeffrey Epstein I Daily Mail Online", "body": "Attachments: WebPage.pdf; Untitled attachment 272048.htm\n\nhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2584309/Bill-Clinton-identified-lawsuit-against-former-friend-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-regular-orgies-Caribbean-compound-former-president-visited-multiple-times.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032233.txt_6939
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032233.txt
subject: Re: Meet?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mosk, Matthew", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016 6:08 PM", "subject": "Meet?", "body": "Mr. Weinberg — \nI am a reporter with the ABC News investigative unit. We are gathering background research on the major \ncandidates for President. \nSeeing that both former President Clinton and Mr. Trump have been mentioned in connection to the Jeffrey \nEpstein case, I am interested in better understanding the case, it's current status, and any information that \ncould help explain Mr. Epstein's dealings and interactions with both men. \nI would very much appreciate the chance to meet and discuss this subject in an off the record conversation at \nyour earliest convenience. \nPlease let me know if that would be possible, and if so, when and where we could meet. \nMany thanks, \nMatthew"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:18 PM", "subject": "Fw: Meet?", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2016, at 8:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Meet?", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/21/2016 2:42:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Meet?", "body": ""}]


