# 0_raw_data

thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031450.txt_3610
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031450.txt
subject: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 9:41:11 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump. \nBecause of this. \n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even \nsaid that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey \nenjoys his social life.\" \nThat story will never die."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033345.txt_3627
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033345.txt
subject: Fwd: Palmer Report updated - 03/24/2019
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["a"], "timestamp": "3/24/2019 5:48:38 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Palmer Report updated - 03/24/2019", "body": "Begin forwarded message:\n\nFrom: Palmer Report <billpalmer@palmerreport.com>\nSubject: Palmer Report updated - 03/24/2019\n\nDate: March 24, 2019 at 3:03:24 AM PDT\n\nTo: ee\n\nReply-To: Palmer Report <billpalmer@palmerreport.com>"}, {"sender": "Palmer Report <billpalmer@palmerreport.com>", "recipients": ["ee"], "timestamp": "March 24, 2019 at 3:03:24 AM PDT", "subject": "Palmer Report updated - 03/24/2019", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024251.txt_3629
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024251.txt
subject: Republicans gird for the Donald Trump debate
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/22/2015 5:29:11 PM", "subject": "Republicans gird for the Donald Trump debate", "body": "as you predicted..\n\nhttp://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/07/republicans-gird-for-the-donald-trump-debate-211033.html?ml=tl_5_b#\n\nDebate Schedule\n\nAugust 6, 2015\n\n9pm ET - Republican Primary Debate\n\nAired On: Fox News Channel\n\nLocation: Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, OH\n\nSponsors: Fox News, facebook\n\nModerators: Bret Baier, Megyn Kelly and Chris Wallace\n\nRules: Top 10 candidates in an average of 5 national polls\n\nCandidates: To be determined\n\nNotes: Fox News has added a candidate forum at 1pm ET the same day for candidates who don't make the debate cut\n\nSeptember 16, 2015\nReagan Library Republican Debate (Press Release)\n\nAired On: CNN and Salem Radio\n\nLocation: Reagan Library in Simi Valley, CA\n\nSponsors: Reagan Library Foundation, CNN, Salem Media Group\nModerators: Jake Tapper, Hugh Hewitt,\n\nRules: Split field into Segment B (top 10 candidates) and Segment A (remaining candidates getting at least 1% in polls) (Details)\n\nCandidates: To be determined\n\nOctober 28, 2015\n\nCNBC Republican Debate\n\nAired On: CNBC\n\nLocation: University of Colorado in Boulder (Press Release)\nSponsors: CNBC (Press Release)\n\nCandidates: To be determined\n\nNovember, 2015*\n\nRepublican Primary Debate\n\nAired On: Fox Business Network\nLocation: Wisconsin\n\nSponsors: Fox Business Network\nCandidates: To be determined\n\nDecember 15, 2015\nRepublican Primary Debate\nAired On: CNN\n\nLocation: Las Vegas, Nevada"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023258.txt_3646
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023258.txt
subject: Detailed constructive list.
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella", "Brad Wechsler FP"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:35 AM", "subject": "Detailed constructive list.", "body": "known . It had both sent in writing and spoken about on the phone numerous times ,_a detailed\nexecution plan was provided . then and only then after all was laid out for the group I was told that after a\number of conversations with brad karp that only 20m would be paid , (and even that was more than\noriginally contemplated ) for both transactions . I feel It was remarkably unfair. Did brad even know of\nour prior agreement.? I called him and he said he was never told.?, I would ask that you I and Brad karp\nsit together if you think it would be helpful. . I would like to send him this email, with your consent of\ncourse. Ifthe transactions were never consummated , 1 would not be owed a dime, however , the price\nwas known up front. , the detailed step by step plan was followed and overseen by me, the price that had\nbeen requested before the transaction was begun, and had Iready heavily discounted, out of friendship,\nfrom our agreement . I believe the decision re paying only 20 m has frankly left me felling quite uneasy.\n\nsince you asked since last nov. ifound 11 million dollars in dormant accounts. 4 million dollars in\neileens drawer. . went through cash flows for phaidon shwoing that john murphy is not an accountant.\nredid your gagosian contract ,. organized structure in case of divorce. set up gift trust. stopped ada from\nincluding multiple times things not in your interest. dealt with bad sales tax use tax income tax . created\n8 millino in deductions ,500k in mistakes , found bank of scotland fbar problems, . . reorg bad art\npurchases , funds taken, , charibale decustions , helped with fincnacil sttment gamoing commions fling. .\nboat deductions, rescued stock from grats.. may 1 after months of brad not finding anyone i sent an\nemail saying you would have to pay more. . on april 15. I sent an email detailing payments owed if i could\nfigure out the basis issue, please see attached, .\n\nquestions you might ask your team ask them to provide a balance sheet or p&1 for REgan arts.\n\ndoesnt exist\n\nask . either wechsler or haperin to tell you what brh is, or how the tra works. .. ? as bronstein to tell you\nwhy the proposed phaidon transaction DOES not work. . as them to give you a plan for the plane. ? ask\nthem to show you the cash mgmt for over 100 million dollars. . ask them to show you the IT system\nprogress after one year. . the approval process for payables. . the cash flow projections? assumptions? ask\nfor a comparative review of investments. ask haperin to describle to you in any detail BRH , the major\nasset of his two biggest clients. tax basis, disposiotion in the estate. . etc. ask brad to show you the\nliquidation of the inteveing art space cos? .\n\nLast year you asked , for my help I told you I preferred not as we would be better off having no financial\nintereactions. the risk was not worth it. You told me that as my friend i had to do it I agreed., here\nwe are in what I find to be an awkward situation. the transactions that i decvised were used _, our\nagreement was ignored. and im not sure how to respond.\n\nDeciisions needed asap 1 phaidon. topco etc. .( cash needs) many wires needed !! 2 new trustee or\nnot. - new decantings 3 art in art partnership.??! overdue ?!4 grats? window - 5 artspace. .6\nregan arts. .7 plane simplify re strucuture re finance. re purpose . 8 .boat restrucutre , sister, 9 re\nfresh estate plan. to consider modifications Alex Victoria equal does not mean same. 10. tra review ,\n\nsale. , 11 brh, doc review, 12. sale of stock or art ? tax, rent sale 13. gifts of art. 14. charity current\nand future pledges , gifts, 15 cash flow. . 16 . new IT and new personnel. 17. operational re-do ( bill pay"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033423.txt_3649
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033423.txt
subject: Re: NY
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski PF", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:59 AM", "subject": "Re: NY", "body": "Jeffrey\nDo you think NY on Monday is still possible?\n\nI guess It makes sense to leave the G550 in PBI until Wednesday then fly it to Boca, Since Trump arrival is\n\nFriday.,\nShould I leave plane in PBI until Wednesday?\n\nThx\nLarry"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 14, 2018, at 10:06 AM", "subject": "Re: NY", "body": "i iwll stay here until wed thrus at earliest"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski PF", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/14/2018 3:12:21 PM", "subject": "Re: NY", "body": "Ok,, Pll make parking arrangements for Thur in Boca if needed,, this way, 550 is in PBI for you if needed"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031824.txt_3650
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031824.txt
subject:
  From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims

messages:
  [{"sender": "DAVID SCHOEN", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/15/2019 12:20:06 AM", "subject": "From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims", "body": "Hope you are satisfied with the outcome all things considered. \nRidiculous article. All of sudden the NPA in 's case goes from no \njurisdiction even to prosecute to you avoiding a possible life \nsentence. Moronic. \nMan I sure would like to see you getting some in the W column though and \nsome press that at least presents the true facts that some of the girls have \nadmitted under oath. Still a story no one ever has heard and they are \ncompelling facts. \nGood Shabbos."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033174.txt_3656
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033174.txt
subject: Isn't it great that...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/8/2016 3:45:09 PM", "subject": "Isn't it great that...", "body": "Trump is owning the headlines this weekend??\nCo-authored with i Phone auto-correct"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031661.txt_3670
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031661.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "2/16/2017 12:21:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "i was pointing out that that alleged rape was reported to be at my house with donald and I raping her."}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 1, 2017, at 7:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "the allegation was not at a pedophile party, it was at my house with me.\n\nto what wording would you suggest I change that?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032518.txt_3671
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032518.txt
subject: Small biz and Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/9/2017 3:29:54 PM", "subject": "Small biz and Trump", "body": "Ifs getting better\nAn index of small-business optimism jumped to 105.8 in December. Indexed to 100 in 1986\n110\n100\n90\n80 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11IllIllIllIll\n86 2000\nSource: NFIB Note: Data are seasonally adjusted.\nAy,\n16\nCNBC\nI was in Toledo Ohio yesterday drilling down on small business animal spirits: amazing how bullish\nthey are there -- for all of DJT's craziness, his ability to present himself as a small biz owner pissed off\nabout regulations/health care/anti-business sentiment in White House was a brilliant stroke. They\nreally dig him down there...."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033148.txt_3685
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033148.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 12:32:45 PM", "subject": null, "body": "read the times interview. I would think about pointing to the stormy daniels. denial by trump his staff and aides. would it have made sense to go back to them? no would they admit no did they admit no , did they obfuscate yes. did they deny , yes so checking with the subject when you have to goods only confuses the reader ?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032426.txt_3689
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032426.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not to disturb you, but I am struck by the similar mannerisms between Trump and McGyver"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 6:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im happy to negotiate with developer on your behalf. . or just give your talking points. allowances\n. commisions fees. free maintence etc"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What if I get it and can't resell?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 9:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iunderstand the fear. thats why we will condition the close on how the others sell"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 2:21:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got hired by Apple this week to do a patent trial."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032256.txt_3692
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032256.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Gerald Barton", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/17/2016 1:53:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "My Extraordinarily Talented, Outrageous Friend, \nThank you for asking how I am doing. The short answer is very well. I hope that you are in good health and \ncontinue to use your special talents to make the world a better place and for your somewhat unique \namusements. \nThe longer answer to your question is that at the end of 2014 I closed down the office of Landmark, transferred \nall of the assets to pay all of the major creditors, except me, and found myself as broke as I was when you first \ncalled me that Friday after Thanksgiving, with my only remaining assets, a large capital loss, my reputation, and \nmy energy. \nSince then, our luck has been better than even an optimist like me would expect. Being free of the $500,000 a \nday I was fined by the OTS, after several years they abandoned this fine, which was initiated strictly to ensure \nthat I had no opportunity to finance any new developments, I became involved with an extraordinary, large, \nimportant real estate development in Oklahoma City and two others in the D.C. area. \nThe bad news is that my dear friend and good partner, Aubrey McClendon, was killed in a single car accident \non March 2nd of this year and the development with great potential is now either delayed or abandoned. The \ngood news is that our involvement in a 1,000 acre development on Deep Creek Lake in western Maryland is in \nthe process of being financed and should be underway sometime this summer. Our second project is a 405 acre \ndevelopment in Harper's Ferry, West Virginia, that is probably the prettiest piece of property I know of in the \nU.S. that is zoned and developable. Its business plan is now underway and we should be in the financing mode \nthis fall. My impression is that there is a tremendous amount of money on the sidelines, but the top 5% or 10% \nthat control it are terribly frightened of losing money they don't need, while the 90% to 95% of the citizens are \ncontinuing their daily labors somewhat frightened that they are not certain where next month's or next year's \nmortgage payment is coming from. \nOn a lighter note, Donald Trump recently bought our development in Ireland, Doonbeg Golf Club. It has been \nrated the first or second best resort in Europe. To-date, to my surprise, he is managing it reasonably well, \nprobably because he is presently devoted to an endeavor that amuses him. \nJeffrey, I want you to understand that I am extremely pleased and not at all melancholy about my present \ncircumstances. Whenever I get an opportunity, I always visit those assets I helped create and almost without \nexception, I wish I had been smarter, but generally satisfied that I made a positive contribution and one much \nhigher than normally done by my competitors, because I am fortunate that the labor focus of my life has not \nattracted the best and the brightest. \nWhen good fortune brings you to the D.C. area, please let me know. I always enjoy understanding your \nactivities and do so with amazement and amusement. \nJerry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how are you"}, {"sender": "Gerald Barton", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jeffrey, \nI am certainly glad that you have thick skin and care little about what the press says. I am sorry that you have \nto appear tolerant against intolerance. \nFrom all appearances, you fulfill the challenge of Kipling when he said: \n\"If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue, \nOr walk with Kings - nor lose the common touch, \nIf neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you, \nIf all men count with you, but none too much.\"\nIn spite of outward appearances, I know very few know how you really feel and I can only hope that that \nfeeling is shown best in the naming of your airplane. \nJerru"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025592.txt_3693
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025592.txt
subject: Re: Caroline Kennedy Selling 93 Acres on Martha's Vineyard
messages:
  [{"sender": "Shaher", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/3/2013 9:37:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Caroline Kennedy Selling 93 Acres on Martha's Vineyard", "body": "Such an estate dear cousin many would like to own „ if at the price I may be willing"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 3, 2013, at 1:46", "subject": "Re: Caroline Kennedy Selling 93 Acres on Martha's Vineyard", "body": "BORING"}, {"sender": "Shaher", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:59 PM", "subject": "Caroline Kennedy Selling 93 Acres on Martha's Vineyard", "body": "Caroline Kennedy Selling 93 Acres on Martha's Vineyard\nCaroline Kennedy, the only surviving child of the late President John F. Kennedy, listed for sale about 90 acres\nof land in Martha's Vineyard, a resort island off the Massachusetts coast.\nTwo waterfront parcels in the town of Aquinnah are on the market -- a 39.5-acre (16-hectare) property\navailable for $20 million, and a 53.5-acre piece for $25 million, according to the listings for 6 Red Gate Farm\nand 8 Red Gate Farm.\n\"An exclusive waterfront property with incredible views of Squibnocket Pond, with further views over\ntowering sand dunes to the Atlantic Ocean,\" the listing for 6 Red Gate Farm reads. \"Plenty of privacy with\nvaried topography and easy pond access. Yours to create a marvelous estate.\"\nThe land is part of a 366-acre stretch that has been private since Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis bought it in 1978,\nsaid John O'Connell, broker and owner of Vineyard Realty Group in Edgartown, Massachusetts.\nThe property is \"a piece of the island that very few people have seen,\" said O'Connell, who isn't involved in\nthe sale.\nCorporate records for Red Gate Farm LLC, which owns the land, lists Edwin A. Schlossberg as the person\nresponsible for the parcels. He is the husband of Caroline Kennedy, who is expected to be Obama's choice as\nthe next U.S. ambassador to Japan."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033580.txt_3694
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033580.txt
subject: Trump Tells Tech Chiefs He Will Foster Innovation - The Wall Street Journal.
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Fisze", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 8:37:33 AM", "subject": "Trump Tells Tech Chiefs He Will Foster Innovation - The Wall Street Journal.", "body": "This is pretty cool, Palantir was the only private company invited to yesterday's tech summit. That seems like a huge change post election and bigger oppty. Let's hang in PB.\n\nI thought you would be interested in the following story from The Wall Street Journal.\nTrump Tells Tech Chiefs He Will Foster Innovation\n\nhttp://www.wsj.com/articles/top-tech-execs-to-meet-trump-to-talk-jobs-regulations-148 1724004\n\nDownload the Wall Street Journal app here: WSJ."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032846.txt_3695
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032846.txt
subject: Fwd: Fw: Meet?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/21/2016 1:54:27 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Meet?", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "iy"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:18 PM", "subject": "Fw: Meet?", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Mosk, Matthew", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016 6:08 PM", "subject": "Meet?", "body": "Mr. Weinberg —\n\nI am a reporter with the ABC News investigative unit. We are gathering background research on the major\n\ncandidates for President.\n\nSeeing that both former President Clinton and Mr. Trump have been mentioned in connection to the Jeffrey\nEpstein case, I am interested in better understanding the case, it’s current status, and any information that\n\ncould help explain Mr. Epstein’s dealings and interactions with both men.\n\nI would very much appreciate the chance to meet and discuss this subject in an off the record conversation at\n\nyour earliest convenience.\n\nPlease let me know if that would be possible, and if so, when and where we could meet.\n\nMany thanks,\n\nMatthew\n\nMatthew Mosk\nProducer, ABC News"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031649.txt_3700
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031649.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers <_ RR wr otc", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got it.\nNow remember\n\nPress is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ehud in on sun pritzkermon. you around? dinner woody sunday. or have you gone dark"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "On Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Times bad. R u around Tuesday?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "On Nov 11, 2016, at 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No , -phone today?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers <9", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can call circa 11"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 9:26:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "was that circa 11?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031281.txt_3705
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031281.txt
subject:
  Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg <hoffenberg.steven@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Players2 <players02@hotmail.com>"], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT", "subject": "JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "C E 0 STEVEN HOFFENBERG / TRUMP SUPER PAC / GET OUR JOBS BACK INC\nTO ROGER STONE\nCHILD RAPE BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN NEW TELL ALL JAMES PATTERSON BOOK FEDS COVER UP NO FED ARREST OF MASS CHILD RAPIST BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN BOOK RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 !!!!!\nSTEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE JAMES PATTERSON BOOK WRITING TEAM.\nWIN PRESIDENT TRUMP !!!!!!!!!!!!!\nSTEVEN HOFFENBERG IS TAKING BACK THE NEW YORK POST NEWSPAPER OPERATIONS !!!!!"}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg <hoffenberg.steven@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["dkiesq@aol.com"], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke <dkiesq@aol.com>", "recipients": ["Michael, Charles <cmichael@Steptoe.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 15, 2016 5:35 PM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM!!!!", "body": "Thanks,\nRegards,\nDarren"}, {"sender": "\"Michael, Charles\" <cmichael@Steptoe.com>", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke <dkiesq@aol.com>"], "timestamp": "August 16, 2016 at 10:42:56 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "Darren:\nBest,\nCharles"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke <dkiesq@aol.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:27 AM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2016, at 11:50 AM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "i"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "8/17/2016 4:01:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032530.txt_3706
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032530.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 2:43:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "am seeing a little bit I don't think it will turn into romance I am a bit old and not tall \nenough but she seems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The white House \nFellowship commison it came through woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032340.txt_3709
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032340.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 9:40:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What was behind this, do you know? Or just nutters?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\n\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032524.txt_3713
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032524.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 00:46", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you playing a part in the xi trump. fun"}, {"sender": "Joshua Cooper Ramo", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "4/10/2017 9:29:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "In Europe. You well?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032242.txt_3734
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032242.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/24/2016 3:14:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yeah, you're the Trump bullet."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Lots of reporters"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031518.txt_3737
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031518.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Zubair Khan"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 4:49 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not so good"}, {"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:21:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Out of 13 states we got 11 right. The ones we got wrong are NY and WI. \nIn the last report, analyzed data was of 3 days in which Clinton got a positive spike after she got clearance from \nFBI. However Trump dominated the social media positively if we analyze one week data before starting time of \nelection, monthly data and entire data which we have gathered for months. Based on this we predicted on our \nFacebook page on 30th October that Trump will be next president of US. \nOur model works but I think the important question which we failed to answer is that how much historic data \nmust be analyzed to make the right decision. This could have been answered if we had a Data Scientist. Also I \nbelieve its a great tool to track voters and get them to vote. It can be used in French elections next year or \nelections of Brazil in 2018 but unfortunately I have to shut down this project as getting data from Twitter is \nexpensive and the start up is running out of money. \nI am going to focus on cyber security again and will definitely reach out if I have a powerful investable idea.\nRegards,\nZubair Khan"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026064.txt_3739
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026064.txt
subject: Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise
messages:
  [{"sender": "EL HACHEM Johnny", "recipients": ["Jeff"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "Dear Jeff, \n\nAs previously discussed between you and Ariane, Edmond de Rothschild is deeply involved in the building and \nfinancing of the infrastructure in Europe. Edmond de Rothschild has an outstanding track record, history and \npresence in European infrastructure, as well as being one of Europe's most recognized financial advisors to \nthe infrastructure market. We have developed deep expertise in the infrastructure sector and sought secure, \nwell-managed assets, generating stable, long-term returns for investors. \n\nWe have done so by initiating and backing two experienced and highly-respected managers in the industry, \nTIIC and BRIDGE. TIIC is an equity investor in transport and social infrastructure. BRIDGE is an infrastructure \ndebt provider. Both managers are covered in more detail below. Edmond de Rothschild has been heavily \ninvolved in the launch of the below funds, providing crucial support in fund structuring, due diligence, capital \nraising, legal & compliance functions as well as the sound governance and ESG management across all funds. \n\nPartnering with TIIC and BRIDGE has enabled Edmond de Rothschild to build a strong franchise within \ninfrastructure investments, complementing its overall Private Equity offering. Edmond de Rothschild has also \nacted as anchor investor for these funds, demonstrating its strong alignment of interest with these \ninvestment teams. With Ariane we strongly believe that we should absolutely find a way to collaborate \ntogether with you to think and initiate something to serve the future needs of the US in the infrastructure \nfield. \n\nPlease find attached further information on each manager. This would also be a chance for us to explore \nopportunities of working together in the future. \n\nPlease feel free to reach out to us if you require any further information. We look forward to hearing from \nyou soon.\n\nKind regards,\n\nJohnny"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "8 Feb 2017, at 12:59", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "thanks, the issue will be returns on investment. . there is a HUGE amount of cash sitting on the \nsidelines, trump will want to do private public partnerships on most things. . donald loves the \nrothschild name."}, {"sender": "Ariane de Rothschild", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 10:20:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "If it s a debt fund , they were thinking of building it around senior and mezzanine debt which would yield 8 to \n10% per yr with a kicker"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030606.txt_3740
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030606.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but i am already getting sick of so many meetings!\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has \nsome questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "No problem.\nI am meeting him as he has some questions. I do not need anything from him.\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "You would get sick of yesterday harvard party. Average age was 60. Non stop boring talks. Run away so quickly!!! \nWill be in nyc the following week feb 5 to 8th. Are you there?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "possibly"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023304.txt_3745
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023304.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella PO"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:55 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Leon, I decided last week that there was little or no upside in disturbing your well earned holiday especiaily as you seemed so peaceful happy and smiley ,getting yourself in shape and truly enjoying your family time. etc. however the situation in your family office is unresolved. I am aware that brad starts monday howver, two last days of the year madness. timber.deal not complete no jpm,acct activity no partnership docs, old stock sales not complete , no bank doc redo. no phaidon note restructure, ., no boat expense review. airplane same ,topco midco.ete still not finished ( trustee ), projections mixed with fiction. , legal exp out of control. no care for admin, silly ( audit). tom conversation with joslin. notes. debra, trustee notes. trustees hiring . bens audit. interest payable made hoopjumping last day of year. after weeks and months. of lectures , gifts to discuss- staff. -houseproject mgmt. . I will continue to try , I had offered ajoint call with eileen before you left. asisaid before , joslin takes instructions from eileen. he said it was made clear to him that he doesn't work for me but works for you. . I tried."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 7:26 AM", "subject": "Fwd: leon DO NOT SEND, hand deliver.", "body": "Transaction complete ! . this - in spite of your collection of Elysium misfits. !!! With Brad out of the office and unable to run his usual interference , the level of his utter incompetence was brought front and center, he may be a step up from Eileen, but ifhe is, then it is not certainly not by much, . Though you and I have spent many many hours discussing the importance of details and mechanics. I was not shown one document re phaidon,- not one.. Brad wanted to keep it private between he and his so called\" advisors \" however as he was out of the office during the most important transaction of the year, I did get to spend time with joslin Joe and john, - the situation in your office is wholly ludicrous - to summarize - the list I provided to Brad last December - things I thought were a priority to get done after consulting with your office still remains virtually undone."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014516.txt_3748
source_file: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014516.txt
subject: Fwd: 2016 Election: Tax Changes Expected
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ens, Amanda <amanda.ens@baml.com>", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "December 15, 2016 at 9:51:37 AM EST", "subject": "2016 Election: Tax Changes Expected", "body": "Rich, following up on your question from a while back about this topic. Please find a white paper attached.\n\nRegards,\nAmanda\n\nThe election of Donald Trump as President is expected to lead to significant tax law changes. The tax changes may come in two parts: from the repeal of the Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) and its related taxes and from comprehensive tax reform. Since Republicans will also have majorities in both the House and Senate, such changes could be undertaken without bipartisan support. Although it is not yet known exactly what the changes will be or when they would be effective, we are issuing this Tax Alert to inform you of changes that are anticipated, based on proposals made during the campaign by both President-elect Trump and the House Republicans. We also discuss how these changes may impact your planning, both currently and in the future."}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 5:40:04 PM", "subject": "Fwd: 2016 Election: Tax Changes Expected", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022202.txt_3749
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022202.txt
subject: your statement?
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:14 AM", "subject": "your statement?", "body": "I have to hand it to I'm sure she deserves the pretty penny she has made for her effort. She has certainly caught the imagination of a public hungry for salacious fiction. To suggest her story is anything other than that, a fiction, is ludicrous. Presidents at dinner on caribean islands. ( clinton was never ever there, easy to confirm ). Sharing a bath with a Prince ( bathtub too small even for one adult ). sex slave being paid thousands of dollars. ( while at the exact same time, she was working as a hostess in a burger bar ). being lent out to a prime minister though this prime mininster, never out of sight of his massive security detail also never visited the island„ sex on a small airplane with a famous lawyer while the other passengers must have been all looking out the window during the event . I would have thought that her fabrications were readilly apparent, but now , being asked to deny what the press has termed her\" allegations \" is frankly silly. ok, to play along I deny each and every allegation. The only person she didn't suggest she was forced to have sex with, was Bilbo Baggins. , maybe its in the sequel."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016467.txt_3757
source_file: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016467.txt
subject: request
messages:
  [{"sender": "Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>", "recipients": ["Susan Edelman <sedelman@nypost.com>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, December 5, 2018 2:55 PM", "subject": "Re: request", "body": "Hi Sue — we do not have a court order; rather, we are bound by the Civil Rights statute cited on the cover page. Thanks."}, {"sender": "Susan Edelman <sedelman@nypost.com>", "recipients": ["Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, December 5, 2018 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re: request", "body": "Hi Dan,\n\nSo it was a unilateral decision by the DA to seal the document?\nThere was no hearing or opportunity to object?\n\nThank you,\n\nSue"}, {"sender": "Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 3:02 PM", "subject": "request", "body": "Hi Sue - this is prescribed by Civil Rights Law § 50-b."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029431.txt_3759
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029431.txt
subject: thank you to friends of Poetry in America
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/17/2017 7:18:33 PM", "subject": "thank you to friends of Poetry in America", "body": "Dear Jeffrey: (and please see personal P.S. under my signature!) \nI am writing now, as I have for the last several years, to update you on the work that Poetry in America and Verse Video Education have done in the \nlast year. Below, I detail the accomplishments of 2017 and, below that, some projects I hope to complete in 2018. But first: my deepest thanks to you \nwho have contributed financially, intellectually, creatively, and in so many other ways to Poetry in America's work. \nSome of you receiving this letter have generously supported Verse Video Education, the independent non-profit production company (a 501c3) I \nfounded in 2015. Verse Video Education now partners with WGBH television as well as with Harvard University (and others) to make the highest \nquality educational media for broad audiences. Whether you supported me by sharing your own interpretive talents on camera or by helping me to \nland elusive talent; whether you provided me funding, or equipment, or business wisdom, or organizational advice, \nor a space in which to film, or just plain interest in the work-- I am immensely grateful. Making media-- and especially television-- is complex, and \nexpensive, and I could not have navigated the road from professor to professor/producer/director without you. \nOthers of you have supported my humanities work at Harvard, and, in particular, Harvard's efforts to provide distance education of all kinds. Now \n(along with partners at the Bok Center, HarvardX, the Graduate School of Education, and the Extension School), I produce educational content for a \nwide global community of learners. Increasingly, Poetry in America not only distributes state-of-the-art humanities content within and beyond \nHarvard's gates, but we also train, mentor, and support a growing number of Harvard undergraduates and graduate students with interests in \neducation, media, and the public humanities. These students now comprise a vibrant community of young Harvard humanists gaining experience in \nonline teaching, curriculum design, educational policy, international education, video production, video editing, and more. By supporting Poetry in \nAmerica, you \nalso support forward-looking humanities education at Harvard. (Update: those of you who are alumni of Harvard College are now eligible to receive \nclass credit for your donations to Poetry in America projects.) \nIt's thrilling for me to report that our two largest efforts of the last few years are both coming to fruition. \nPoetry in America's 13-episode television series, along with its parallel PBS LeamingMedia Collection for educators, will air on PBS stations \nnationwide beginning in April 2018. Click here for a sneak peek at our 90-second series trailer (password: Poetry90). Featuring such guest \ninterpreters as those in the trailer-- and dozens of others-- each half-hour episode of the series offers a deep dive into one important American poem. \nDiscussions on a second season have begun! \nMeanwhile, our Harvard partners at the Extension School and the Graduate School of Education have agreed, for a limited time, to make the full \nsuite of Poetry in America online courses accessible to learners all over the world, offering a steep reduction in course fees. Students and teachers \nworldwide can now take any Poetry in America course-- at any credit level-- for $200. (Take a look at our 2018 offerings here.) Those of you who \nsupport individual schools or school networks: please note that through 2018 groups of five teachers or students can take any Poetry in America \ncourse for $1000 and receive graduate, undergraduate, or professional development credit-- and, that group's facilitator can receive free tuition. \nPlease feel free to distribute our offerings to educators whose work you support anywhere in the world. \nHarvard's highly unusual decision to slash tuition for the next year follows the great success of Poetry in America's first course for educators--\nPoetry in America for Teachers: The City from Whitman to Hip Hop. In recognition of this course, David Coleman (president of the College Board) \nhas offered support to allow us to continue developing and providing access to the highest quality educational and professional development \nhumanities content. In 2018, as I lay out below, we seek to expand the scope of our offerings, and to work with our many partners to broaden access \nto all learners. \nThank you for your support for this work, and warmest best to you all in this holiday season. \nSincerely, \nLisa \nP.S. and thank you so much, Jeffrey, for your amazing support, without which much of what I've managed in the last few years would never have \nhappened. My next course for teachers„ as you'll notice, has shifted from art to environment--not because of any less passion on my part for arts \ncontent but really because of greater enthusiasm among others for poetry/science for the classroom. I would like to hear more from you about what \nyou think kids/schools need in this area. Larry tells me you have views; as I move out of my central areas, I will need advice xxoolisa"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028976.txt_3762
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028976.txt
subject: woody and deadline
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/4/2016 6:25:26 PM", "subject": "woody and deadline", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nWoody has received from his lawyer some questions I asked in in response to the agreement Irwin Tenenbaum\nsent me....I found that that agreement generous and reasonable (!), and I'm excited to go forward, but I do need\nthose clarifications. We can absolutely agree that we will not give Woody larger or more important billing than\nBill Clinton or Joe Biden, and that I'd like to come to him to renew our agreement after five years.\n\nThe Harvard week of content in which Woody will appear, if we can sign this, needs to be edited in the next\nweek-10 days. We are out of time, which is why I'm writing\n\nThe television show has been picked up by American Public Television, they will distribute nationally, and\nthey've asked for another 5 episodes. I so want Woody to be one of those.\n\nI'd like to see the haiku written by computer. Haiku is not that hard. I'd like to see an elegy written by\ncomputer.\n\nLisa"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022768.txt_3768
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022768.txt
subject: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "James Hill", "recipients": ["James E. Esq."], "timestamp": "Tuesday, April 21, 2015", "subject": "inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "I write to you regarding Jeffrey Epstein - and your representation of him in the CVRA case in which he is an intervener.\n\nABC News has recently conducted an on-camera interview with Doe #3), portions of which are very likely to be airing on Good Morning America and other ABC programs this week.\n\nwe would like to offer you an opportunity to respond to the allegations she has raised about Mr. Epstein.\n\nShould you wish to make a statement or respond in any other manner - I will need it by close-of-business wednesday.\n\nCan you tell me who among you I should be in contact with?\n\nThanks kindly,\nJames Hill\nJames of ABC News."}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["James E. Hill"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "James, just confirming that you are sending me the bulletpoints from the interview you are asking about, thanks\nMarty"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2015, 4:36 PM", "subject": "Re: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Greetings.\n\nNews re Jeffrey Epstein\n\ninterview with Doe #3), portions of which\n\nShe says that Epstein liked her to dress up in outfits, including bondage and schoolgirl outfits:\nShe says she met Bill Clinton on n’s island in the USVI. She does not specify a date but says she is 100% sure it was Clinton and it was on the island.\nClinton but alleges nothing further regarding Clinton. -\nShe says one person - who she wouldn’t name - that Epstein loaned her out to -\nShe says she ate dinner with Epstein and cally assaulted and raped her. She says this happened on Epstein’s island, and that she had been sent by Epstein - alone -to meet this person screamed but no one came to her aid.\nfor her life.\nalleged beating and rape afterwards and she said he didn’t\nShe says she\nShe says she told Epstein about the\nShe says Epstein and Maxwell asked her to have a child for them and to sign a document signing away the rights to the child in the event that she and Epstein falling out. She says she refused this request. -\nShe says Epstein has a sick problem, is a pedophile, a dangerous man who should not be walking"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023310.txt_3776
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023310.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:44 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "PLEASE READ CAREFULLY ,\nMark was here this morning , the proposed transactions are extremely complex . and would take a great deal\nof detailed time. I do not know how, and if ,to move forward - our last transaction. a transaction which you\nsaved 600 million in tax. even if as you say it could be 20 years away , ( i hope longer) discounted to today is\na savings of 300 million . for some reason you chose to ignore our agreements , verbal written and emailed -\nand decided that it was only worth 8 million dollars to you. . ( assuming phaidon -richard happens. the\ncalculation that you can see isa 24m savings not including artspace and debt benefits- certain to come later\n. IMPORTANT NOTE\n\nthe phaidon transaction as currently contemplated will not work . NOT CLOSE\n\nWhen we had our meeting in your home in Bedford. You asked me for my help. I told you multiple times\nthat i thought it was a very bad idea, in that I greatly preferred to have no financial interactions. I don't have\nmany friends and didn't want money in any way to interfere with our unique relationship. Reminder, For five\nyears you had the kind, but very goofy Eileen Alexandersson as the sole manager of your massive accounting ,\nlegal, investments. reporting, trusts etc. When I first told you in no uncertain terms that I firmly believed she\nwas incompetent you admonished me for \" speaking out of both sides of my mouth\". With regard Brad\nWechsler, there has never been a \" both sides. \". I have consistantly maintained since day one that he was\nhighly unsuited for the job. When you initially asked me to help convince him to take the role , promising him\na position to manage mirage investments I sent you a note saying that instead of hiring him you should pay up\nand get first class people. I have reiterated the same message for over a year now. . Brad , not me ,was tasked\nwith hiring new people , according to his biz school org chart.(nauseating ) and as you wanted him to take\nownership of the staff,he conducted many interviews alone. . you may recall that as late as may, you told him in\nmy presence that though six months had passed he had not hired anyone. since then I have rectified errors in\nsales tax, use tax, income tax, fbar reporting, 1031 reporting, 8 million of deductions missed errors of millions\non the returns. a cashflow that is misleading helped prepare financial statements ( april ) Oversight on new\ngrats- first at 22 and then at 19 that were done without my consultation and were \"resolved\" soley as a result\nof my last minute intervention. . 600 million in after tax savings was just accomplished. (BTW- for some\nreason you left the 30 million outstanding that I had said should only be done\" if” that was my additional\nfee. and not used for non biz purposes and not art.\n\nSorry but .,\n\nin June and then again Sept, we both agreed to a 50% of phaidon payout first projected at 20 . but less when\nartspace and debt taken out, - then only after weeks, when you delayed any detailed discussion of money\nwanting to give the issue a thoughtful response ( which I fully understand ) . you unilaterally changed our\nagreement.. 5m would be reserved for the future ? . and out of the remaining 15m ,? 1 would receive only a\nthird. (note: I'm confident that both the debt , and the art space investment will also lead to a write- off of\nanother 30 m. plus ) In my dining room ,you were surprised when I said that i require most people to pay\ntheir advisory fee up front so that I am assured that I will be properly compensated for my work when\nstrategies are implemented . you may recall that you appeared offended and said \" are you suggesting that 1\nwould go back on my word\" I said no , of course not ! you are my closest of friends ,but my experience is\nthat when amounts get large, people tend to get unhappy when it actually comes time for them to pay.\n\nI include below the email i sent to you on April 15, the day i was examining your returns It laid out my\nunderstanding of the compensation agreed for a transaction of the magnitude to the penny of the one just\ncompleted.ic 600m When it appeared that the transcation would and could go foward I was the first to point\nout that our agreement would cost you too much money, therefore\n\nFrom day one I proposed to discount our agreement toa 50-60 million range. An extremely fair price for"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022216.txt_3778
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022216.txt
subject: Results
messages:
  [{"sender": "Al seckel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2010 5:36:27 PM", "subject": "Results", "body": "Jeffrey, \n\nThe bats did the sweep. Here are the new results taken as of a minute ago. \nYou have only one negative article left on front page of google, which is \nthe Huffington Post article. The Huffington Post is extremely hard to \nmove, because it is so powerful, has millions of links to it, and uploads \nmassive new and original content it on a daily basis with posting from out \nside readers. We managed to push it down the page, as it used to be at the \ntop. If we were able to post original content to both the science and the \norg site (absolutely not a single word to this day by Jessica, just talk), \nwe would have been able to push it down even further, and off the page. WE \ndid manage to get rid of the daily beast article, which is now far \nremoved, inspite of their own efforts to keep it prominent. \nToxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatically when you \ntyped in your name are also now removed. \nWikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the top of the \nsearch engine results. ow the head lines do not mention convicted sex \noffender or pedophile. Instead, Philanthrophic work, Epstein Foundation, \nPromotion of Scientists. We have stopped the hacking on your wiki site, \nand that was a major effor. Your wiki entry now is pretty tame, and bad \nstuff has been muted, bowlerized, and pused to the bottom. Careful editing \nand wording has muted the effect immensely. We hacked the site to replace \nthe mug shot and caption, and now has an entirely different photo and \ncaption. This was a big success. \nWe pushed the Edge all the way up to the front page, where it was \npreviously buried on page 5 of google search. \nWe have promoted the other jeffrey epsteins, and other pages are also \nfilled with your material. \nAnd, while the sites are up, and in the direction we hoped, they are still \nnew, and subject to volitility, especially if new original content is not \nadded on a minimum of a weekly basis. I have been forbideen to add new \ncontent to the philanthrophic site as well as the science site, and \ntherefore, as a result our rating slipped down (still on the first page, \nbut would have liked them (and some of the articles to been able to push \nHuffington off page). We also helped with you images, and the first images \nthat come of you on a google search are not of your mug shot, etc. \nYour daily beast foe is still at it, and trying to promote her sites \nagainst you in the same way that we try to depromote you. \nAs far as this site is concerned, and the continuation of this, I do not \nknow what you wish to do. Clearly, you have no interest in my continuing. \nAnd, I am not sure if you want to continue the project at all. If the \nlatter, and you stop, eventually it will just go into the way of entropy, \nand it will return to the old form. The major work has been done, but it \nneeds to be maintained. For it to get better results, it needs to have \nconstant input and supervision, and that means generating proper content, \nnot just editing and grammatical fixes. Writers need to know what to \nwrite. THe philanthrophy site is at the bottom of the page precisely \nbecause you have not allowed us to add any content to it, and as a result \nit suffers. \nYou paid Mike $2500, which he applied for the purchasing of his \nreplacement servers, but his fee of $7500 balance is now due if you want \nto continue. Please let me know what you want to do. I need to inform him, \nand if you are not going to use him, he needs to take on his other clients \nand devote his time there. \nThis needs to be contrasted with what we started with, which was a search \non your name, which had nine/10 very toxic prominent stories, and toxic \nWiki article and headline.\n\nSearch Results\n1. Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia  \n9 visits - Dec 2 \nJeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953 in Coney Island, New York) is a Jewish-American \nfinancier and philanthropist. Epstein was raised in Coney ... \nPhilanthrophic Work - The Epstein Foundation Promotion of Scientists \nen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein - Cached - Similar \n2. Images for jeffrey epstein  \n- \n3. \n,1111 \nlif Alea 1 \nJeffrey Epstein I Profiles in Science \nJeffrey Epstein presents some of the greatest minds and finest scientists working today. \nwww.jeffreyepsteinscience.com/ - Cached \n4. Jeffrey Epstein: International Moneyman of Mystery  \nHe's pals with a passel of Nobel Prize—winning scientists, CEOs like Leslie Wexner of the Limited, \nsocialite Ghislaine Maxwell, even Donald Trump. \nnymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/ - Cached - Similar \n5. Edge: JEFFREY EPSTEIN  \nJEFFREY E. EPSTEIN is a money manager and science philanthropist who currently serves as the \nChairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Financial Trust ... \nwww.edde.ord/3rd culture/bios/epstein.html - Cached - Similar \n6. The Plastic Surgeon: Jeffrey Epstein I Full of Crop  \nDec 9, 2010 ... Dr. Jeffrey Epstein is an internationally known reconstructive surgeon, known for \nexhibiting the highest standards in the medical field. \nfullofcrop.com/2010/12/09/the-plastic-surgeon-jeffrey-epstein/ - Cached \n7. Jeffrey Epstein, MD, FACS, Miami, New York Hair Transplant Surgeon  \nDr. Epstein and the hair transplant surgeons at the Foundation for Hair Restoration are experts in the \nfield of hair restoration. Dr. Epstein is one of the ... \nwww.foundhair.com/pages/about.shtml - Cached - SimiIr \n8. Jeffrey Epstein, Convicted Pedophile And Former Hedge Fund Titan ...  \nJul 21, 2010 ... Jeffrey Epstein, the former hedge fund manager who pleaded guilty to soliciting an \nunderage girl for prostitution, is now free of the ... \nwww.huffingtonpost.com/.../jeffrey-epstein-disgraced_n_654674.html - Cached \n9. Dr. Jeffrey Epstein, MD, FACS I Board Certified Plastic Surgeon ...  \nDr. Jeffrey Epstein has been in solo private practice in Miami since 1994, and New York City since \n2005, and is a Clinical Professor at the University of ... \nwww.justformenplasticsurgery.com/AboutDrEpstein.asp - Cached - Similar \n10. Jeffrey Epstein on Sports  \nAn old school look at today's sport's world focusing on professional basketball and football byJeffrey \nEpstein. \nwww.jeffreyepsteinsports.com/ - Cached \n11. Jeffrey Epstein I Philanthropy  \nJeffrey Epstein has three main philanthropic and charitable organizations he uses to fund arts, \nsciences, research and other causes. \nwww.jeffreyepstein.org/ - Cached"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030612.txt_3783
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030612.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but i am already getting sick of so many meetings!\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has \nsome questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "No problem.\nI am meeting him as he has some questions. I do not need anything from him.\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023338.txt_3790
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023338.txt
subject: agenda
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:32 PM", "subject": "agenda", "body": "Mark was here this morning , the proposed transactions are extremely complex . and would take a great deal of detailed time. I do not know how, and if ,to move forward - our last transaction. a transaction which you saved 600 million in tax. even if 20 years away ,( ihope longer) even discounted is a 300 million savings . for that you ignored our agreements , verbal written and emailed -and decided that it was only"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella ii"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:21 AM", "subject": "agenda", "body": "1 fees, amount and to what entities when and responsiblitis. 2. gagosian idea to save a minimum of 10 mill and maybe more. 3. ican walk you through carlyns screw up, 50 % would have made little difference and maybe made it worse . 4. we should have an all hands meeting with your family to talk about art distribution on death. . 5. phaidon, decantings ( already firmly in progress ) loans. (alan ) pent. ( with follow up ) all part of same elegant transaction, 6 asymetric risk worth at least 50- 60 no matter how you calculate. Ican explain. 7 lets get the money issue out of the way once and for all. I have my team set to start."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 5:52 AM", "subject": "agenda", "body": "1) pg 1 A” unequal shares\". pg 23 \"removal of trustees \" absolute. dont be confused with abiltiy to set up seperate trusts, , 2) I am reachable this afternoon in europe. on cell. 3. on another note . -our financial agreement ended months ago . seperate from the art partnership (which 1 was told yesterday to my amazement is still not funded) . 1am obligated to complete ? the time 1 have dedicated since oct/ dec has been spent mainly as your friend. tom, brad though i am fully cognizant of my responsiblities. I will try to help find people. Iam not good at human resources. howevr If I don;t think they are good enough for you. I will continue to say so , and you obviously decide. but I will reiterrate even in the face of your \"nobody is good enough argument.\" keeping foremost in my mind that you and I have only beeen shown a very tiny handful of people. 4. I find the friction over fees , counterproductive. in an attempt to avoid it I had suggested a multi year deal early on. you rejected it. I then suggested, and urged you to have an option at a fixed fee , you also rejected that .you wanted the fee payment only at the end I argued but ,conceded. I suggested a structure that tom didn't like. you rejected it. 5 I suggest you make a fair proposal.- that 1 can either accept or reject. some payment up front this time is a requirement. I am willing to modify any outstanding obligations. - there are creative ways to assure you of your desired characterization of those payments. 6 you should open accts at Deutsh . and goldman. I am told that eilleen has set up over one hundred bank acccts for you???!!. few relevant 7 you should immediatly demand a list of all her acct authorites , exec poistions . director etc. bank authorizsations. etc. talk later or over the weekend if you like"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "agenda", "body": "that needs to be done youandI will hire new people , and it will be self running. ( it was may in my house when you told brad it had been 5 months and you were getting fed up ) I will set up a parallel . office , somenoe like wendy dolman or her quality is paramount. two accountants two bookeepers and two office admins. . alan and zoe will handle trusts and grats. heatehr diana george will be incolved in art partnership. if you want brad, analysts etc. and kids to do investments I have little to add in that regard ,except to be able to account for things properly. I suggest that the kids must have skin in any deal. Alternatively , we can continue to focus on fun and let someone else do the things that you want done. and you and I can kibbitz about it all. structures outcomes risk, museums. charity, ( joslins answer by the way was I had asked how much charity was leon planining to give this year , (the 2m) he didnt include your foundation or the payment to me, or from debra and you??!!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032885.txt_3791
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032885.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Lets catch up next time you are in NYC. NYT is making me write more on markets now and I don't really know who to believe any more re where the market is going these days."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:38:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no place else to invest for alpha, your children are rich"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032383.txt_3808
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032383.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 12:52:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Interesting\n\nGrey is at least reasonably smart."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 28, 2016, at 7:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2016/05/01/trump-touts-henry-kravis-as-treasury-secretary-again-and-\nagain-declines.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033225.txt_3817
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033225.txt
subject: I don’t know if they’ll publish this: "Comedian made an art...," Obituary, Feb. 10
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner <paulkrassner@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["DANNY GOLDBERG", "Sam/Walli Lett", "Michael Simmons"], "timestamp": "2/12/2017 12:25:16 AM", "subject": "I don’t know if they’ll publish this:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["letters@latimes.com"], "timestamp": "February 11, 2017 at 12:56:37 PM PST", "subject": "Re: \"Comedian made an art...,\" Obituary, Feb. 10", "body": "The obituary of unique comedian Irwin Corey stated, “Over a career that spanned more than 70 years, Corey performed in vaudeville, radio, television, films, Broadway, nightclubs and Las Vegas showrooms.”\n\nIn 1983, I was fortunate to be booked as the opening act for Corey in a four-day run at the Julia Morgan Theater in Berkeley. He revealed his dark side in a room backstage, where we smoked a joint, and he told me how he used to read Nazi hate literature to get him in the mood to perform. And there was a certain sense of continuity on his deathbed. The night before he died, he said to a close friend, James Drougas, “Trump will be assassinated soon.”\n\n“Professor” Corey also had a humanitarian streak. In 1996, in my magazine, The Realist, I published a photo of him, from a video by his son Richard, presenting Fidel Castro a bag of California-grown pistachio nuts (Castro said, “California, hmmmm, good climate there for nuts”), a book on the Rosenberg controversy, and a credit-card-size calculator (Castro said, “I’ll have to use my little pinky to push the buttons”). Dave Channon reported that Corey was on a diplomatic mission to lift the embargo on health supplies to Cuba, and he visited a hospital that was providing sophisticated treatment for the survivors of Chernobyl. Cuban health care provided for more radiation victims than did the U.S.\n\nPaul Krassner\nDesert Hot Springs"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022998.txt_3818
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022998.txt
subject: Fwd: Press Inquiry: Miami Herald expose and protective order
messages:
  [{"sender": "CNS Adam Klasfeld", "recipients": ["Mr. Link"], "timestamp": "November 28, 2018 at 6:34:54 PM EST", "subject": "Press Inquiry: Miami Herald expose and protective order", "body": "Dear Mr. Link:\n\nA transcript made public today show how Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team fought for and ultimately won a broad protective order in the lawsuit filed by accuser Sarah Ransome against your client Jeffrey Epstein. It also shows the Maxwell legal team's concern about the media coverage, especially from the Miami Herald, weeks before it published today's bombshell investigation today.\n\nMy questions are:\n\nWhat is your response to the Miami Herald story published today?\n\nHow would you respond to the series’ allegations that there has been a more than decade-long cover-up of Epstein and his powerful associates, including by Trump's current secretary of labor Alexander Acosta?\n\nPlease reply ASAP as I am on deadline."}, {"sender": "Scott J. Link", "recipients": ["E. jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2018 11:50:16 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Press Inquiry: Miami Herald expose and protective order", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028786.txt_3837
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028786.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "1/23/2012 2:54:42 PM", "subject": null, "body": "dershowiz tells me obama called him to ask him what was going on in israel. ? we should discuss."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029498.txt_3839
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029498.txt
subject: Trump set to dine with law professor Alan Dershowitz
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Gordon Getty", "Norman Finkelstein"], "timestamp": "4/11/2018 2:18:04 AM", "subject": "Trump set to dine with law professor Alan Dershowitz", "body": "My God\n\nthat Jewish Nazi is joining to join our Narcissistic Psychopath for dinner—how appropriate\n\nhttps://www.cnn.com/2018/04/10/politics/donald-trump-alan-dershowitz/index.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032891.txt_3852
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032891.txt
subject: Re: This Chart Predicts Trump Will Win, Unless the S&P Rallies in October - Bloomberg
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "10/1/2016 3:05:32 AM", "subject": "Re: This Chart Predicts Trump Will Win, Unless the S&P Rallies in October - Bloomberg", "body": "tuesday"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 3:56 AM", "subject": "Re: This Chart Predicts Trump Will Win, Unless the S&P Rallies in October - Bloomberg", "body": "http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-30/this-chart-\nwill-win-unless-the-s-p-\nrallies-in-october"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031788.txt_3854
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031788.txt
subject: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for 'junk bond king' Milken
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/15/2018 1:06:12 PM", "subject": "Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for 'junk bond king' Milken", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/15/trump-advisors-reportedly-seeking-a-pardon-for-junk-bond-king-milken.html  \n\nTrump advisors reportedly seeking a \npardon for 'junk bond king' Milken \nTae Kim \n'74-14130r. \nSeveral of President Donald Trump's advisors are pushing him to pardon Michael Milken, \nBloomberg News reported Friday. \nMichael Milken, 71, was known as the \"junk bond king\" in the 1980s and was convicted for \nsecurities fraud. \nBloomberg said former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci, \nTreasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, senior advisor Jared Kushner and attorney Rudy  \nGiuliani support the pardon for Milken. \nMilken has a net worth of $3.7 billion, according to Forbes. The financier, who pioneered \nthe market for high-yield bonds while at Drexel Burnham Lambert, was sentenced to 10 \nyears in prison and permanently banned from the securities industry by the Securities and \nExchange Commission. His prison term was reduced to two years. \nThe White House and a spokesperson for the Milken Institute did not immediately respond \nto requests for comment. \nSee the full Bloomberg News report here."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031477.txt_3860
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031477.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Keough, Michael", "recipients": ["Will Bohlen", "King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlfold", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remi Gulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz", "David Marin", "Silings", "rake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:10 PM", "subject": null, "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033410.txt_3866
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033410.txt
subject: Re: Off the record trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "4/13/2019 10:44:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "WOW"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 13, 2019 at 6:39:25 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "Thanks. I appreciate it. I was just reporting what I heard."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 13, 2019, at 6:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "I never told anyone that. I know nothing about that. I have no idea what you are talking about."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 1:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "Just heard you were telling people that you heard I asked Trump for a million dollars. Totally false. Please check every false allegation with me before repeating to others."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029671.txt_3869
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029671.txt
subject: Re: After Words
messages:
  [{"sender": "Katherine Keating", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Oct 31, 2011 4:21 AM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "Dear Friends,\n\nwanted to share with you the forward to my father's new book ‘After Words’. He truly is\nan inspiration and so is his writing. The book, which is a compilation of his speeches, was\nlaunched yesterday in Sydney. will be sure to send you a copy, it's a brilliant read.\n\ntrust this email finds you well.\n\nKindest regards\n\nKatherine X\n\nCreativity is central to our endeavours"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Katherine Keating"], "timestamp": "Oct 31, 2011 6:50 AM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "where are you?"}, {"sender": "Katherine Keating", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Oct 31, 2011 10:42 AM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "In NY. You?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Katherine Keating"], "timestamp": "10/31/2011 3:08:38 PM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "Send me your phone number\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029117.txt_3870
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029117.txt
subject: Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/29/2017 10:03:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Agree! ‘Get It Right’ is singular priority - we think alike. This is the Role and Importance of pre-production.\nFunds adequate.\n\nClarity critical, as is charisma. However, given intimacy of TV interviews, it’s not always apparent upfront who\ncommunicates well. Usually by not always. Sometimes someone who is a great lecturer to 500 students falls flat\nor off puts as arrogant. Sometimes a mousey introvert with intense eye and facial expressions sparkles and\n\nradiates. There is no substitute, however, for clarity.\n\nLooking forward to discussion."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "it need to be about the topic and the person. some of these people are not engaging at all. Im happy to pay\nfor more preprduction to get it right."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn iii", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 3:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Terrific; looking forward.\n\nExcited to go through math candidates on the list, others too.\n\nEqually important, discuss edits/modifications to the 13 episodes (cutting blahs), expanding math episodes -\nsee below. Assuming we expand math episodes, we will need more mathematicians.\n\nHow’s late afternoon after 5:30 pm / early evening today? - or weekend, day/times? (Family issues today -\nmother 102 in May.)\n\nRADICAL BREAKTHROUGHS - Initial Revisions (working model for discussion, red is new)\n\nExpand and Modify Mathematical Breakthrough episodes\n1. Mathematics and Truth / Overview / Show Excitement/Importance\n2. Mathematical Fields / Diverse New Kinds and Categories\n\n3. How Math Works in Disparate Areas of Knowledge (from fundamental physics to chemistry,\nbiology [molecular and evolutionary|, psychology, sociology, economics, etc.)\n\n4. Power Laws\n\n5. Mathematical Biology"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032068.txt_3871
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032068.txt
subject: Re: Gps GTX Smart Shoe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Gps GTX Smart Shoe", "body": "• About GTX \n• Products & Services \n• Platform \n• News \n• Contact Us \n• Investors \n• Press \n• Blog \n• \n• \n• \nVideos \n0 \nWatch Video \no GTX Corp on YouTube \no Locimobile"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "9/22/2011 10:19:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Gps GTX Smart Shoe", "body": "we will have dinnner at 8 „ you can bring your maldives friend or anyone else. ( no women ). we should \nspend an hour together just the two of us. today tomorrow:?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029196.txt_3872
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029196.txt
subject: Re: October 19, Heidelberg
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Braun", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jun 6, 2018, at 2:15 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Dear Lawrence Kraus,\n\nmy name is Michael Braun and I am working on the DAI Heidelberg's fall program brochure.\nMay I ask you if you settled on a topic for your Heidelberg talk?\nIf so, could you send me title and a short abstract for me to include in the brochure and on our website?\n\nBest\nMichael"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 06.06.2018 um 19:13", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. I hadn't thought of it. I don't know what Jakob would prefer. I could give a science talk.. on, say: Journey to the Beginning of Time.. or I could speak about \nScience in the Trump Era.. am cc'ing him here.. Jakob, which would you prefer?\nLawrence"}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jun 7, 2018, at 1:04 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence,\n\nI think we take Journey to the Beginning of Time.\nCould you write two sentences for my colleague to \nmake clear where your talk will go for..\nThis may well lay the groundwork for next year's major focus \non ORIGINES.\nI do look forward to having you here again!\n\nAs ever Jakob\n\nP.S cc Michael!"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 07.06.2018 um 17:40", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Will do."}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jun 19, 2018, at 5:52 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Dear Lawrence\nmy colleague is waiting for two sentences on your planned topic...\nCould you save him?...\nJakob"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 17.08.2018 um 16:37", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Jakob \nThere has been a complication. The Gottingen event had to be cancelled so that means I now do not have an air ticket to Germany. I \nam going to check whether I can arrange anything in the Uk which might cover part of the cost for a new ticket. In the meantime I \nthought I should let you know and ask whether it is possible to cover part or all of the cost for a ticket. \nLawrence."}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "On Aug 17, 2018, at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence \nyour mail meets me on the way out to a week abroad. \nI need my financial colleague to decide. So, I shall be \nback at the end of this month. \n\nWhat would our share be?\nBest Jakob"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "On Aug 17, 2018, at 9:34 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Well it depends on UK.. if they can't do it, then alas, it would be the whole thing.. I could check for a \ndiscount ticket of course.. and maybe even economy class... There is also a small chance that I might do the \nevent in UK with Noam Chomsky, and I am wondering whether, if I could convince him to join me in a \ndialogue at your place whether that might change the dynamics of the event for you, and free up some more \nmoney perhaps..\nLawrence"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 26.08.2018 um 22:04", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. update.. noam cannot do anything anyway.. nor UK that week.. So, I have been able confirm I can get the \nticket for the discounted amount of 4500 Euros.. Are you game with my proposal? I have until end of Sept to \nbuy out the old ticket before they cancel it. \nLawrence"}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "August 29, 2018 at 4:49:53 AM PDT", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence,\n\njust back from a long tour ,,on origins\".\nAs promised you will get my message promptly.\nAs you may understand, before we start recruiting for the Festival our budget \nimplies more freedom. Now I simply do not have the flexibility to decide so easily \non amounts in „kilos\". (especially as a prominent Nobel laureate shortly before \ndeadline agreed to come and implied a pretty large sum).\nWhat I can offer you is 5k as a lump sum. This is the ultimate at the moment.\nI deeply regret these limitations but I cannot ignore redlines.\nSo please let me know if you can or cannot come.\n\nAs ever Jakob"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "On Aug 29, 2018, at 11:06 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. so, here is the event I am still invited to give in Germany. It is Oct 19th. I was previously invited to give \na major lecture in Heidelberg Oct 14 but they had to cancel it after the university determination re australia \nwas publicized by the bitch. That air ticket, which they had paid fo, was about 5250 euros. There is a $900 \ncancellation fee, and they have agreed to let me keep the ticket if I pay them 4500 euros. I offered that to the \nother place but they only have $5K USD total, which includes the $4K fee they originally offered me. I am \ngoing to check other tickets now, but wanted to know if you might be flying to europe around then and could \ntake a hitchhiker. :)"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 2:29 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "actually I found I can buy an economy (YUK) ticket for only $1300.. so maybe I can buy that and try to \nupgrade it using miles.."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "On Aug 29, 2018, at 11:56 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "What was Justin bill ? nd total to date?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 3:07 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "please call me asap"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "On Aug 29, 2018, at 12:19 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "3 hrs"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/29/2018 11:01:49 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Talk in 40?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025974.txt_3876
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025974.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:42:23 -0400", "subject": "RE:", "body": "congragulations"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you!\nDid you really like it?\nHow did you like furniture?\nWhat would you change it?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:01:22 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i think it was terrific , the only thing i would think about is having only one lit sculpture at a \ntime . put one in storage or covered , but you want to call attention to one at a time."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 9:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great! Happy to hear it.\nTrust your advice and taste -this is why I am asking!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:06:27 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and maybe have the large colums black instead of gold, as the gold paint is not as good as the \ngold metal objects."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 9:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was thinking of black.\nIt is not a gold pain but a gold leafing. It took them 2 months to do it.\nWhat I do not like that it came out more as a Trump gold that an old gold."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:16:43 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "exactly"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just a quick question - do you have any name for a potential LP for my fund. I am planning a final close \nend of September /October.\nPlease let me know"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, 28 Jul 2016 06:18:55 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Are you around this Friday and weekend.\nI am - and leaving on Sunday at 5pm for Greece until August 15th/.\nIf you around would love to see you.\ni will see one maybe today. . i am off until aug 29"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 28 2016 05:44 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "please find attached an updated deck.\nPlease let me know if you have any candidate!\nSo far all LPs are AAA+ and there is a pipeline of 8 companies converted at the cost."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025960.txt_3879
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025960.txt
subject: Re: Mechanisms for learning
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nthank you for your support and encouragement, even where I fail.\n\nSorry for being such an embarrassment today. I will spell out today's argument a bit better and cohesive when I get to it. Also, I should have recognized that the main point I tried to make would trigger Noam (who was as always very generous, patient, kind and humble on the personal level, even though he did not feel like conceding anything on the conceptual one).\n\nAlmost all of Noam's work focused on the idea that humans have very specific circuits or modules (even when most people in his field began to have other ideas), and his frustration is that it is so hard to find or explain them.\n\nI found Noam's hypothesis very compelling in the past. I still think that the idea that language is somehow a cultural or social invention of our species is wrong. But I think that there is a chance (we don't know that, but it seems to most promising hypothesis IMHO) that the difference between humans and apes is not a very intricate special circuit, but genetically simple developmental switches. The bootstrapping of cognition works layer by layer during the first 20 years of our life. Each layer takes between a few months and a few years to train in humans. While a layer is learned, there is not much going on in the higher layers yet, and after the low level learning is finished, it does not change very much. This leads to the characteristic bursts in child development, that have famously been described by Piaget.\n\nThe first few layers are simple perceptual stuff, the last ones learn social structure and self-in-society. The switching works with something like a genetic clock, very slowly in humans, but much more quickly in other apes, and very fast in small mammals. As a result, human children take nine months before their brains are mature enough to crawl, and more than a year before they can walk. Many African populations are quite a bit faster. In the US, black children outperform white children in motor development, even in very poor and socially disadvantaged households, but they lag behind (and never catch up) in cognitive development even after controlling for family income.\n\nGorillas can crawl after 2 months, and build their own nests after 2.5 years. They leave their mothers at 3-4 years. Human children are pretty much useless during the first 10-12 years, but during each phase, their brains have the opportunity to encounter many times as much training data as a gorilla brain. Humans are literally smarter on every level, and because the abilities of the higher levels depend on those of the lower levels, they can perform abstractions that mature gorillas will never learn, no matter how much we try to train them.\n\nThe second set of mechanisms is in the motivational system. Motivation tells the brain what to pay attention to, by giving reward and punishment. If a brain does not get much reward for solving puzzles, the individual will find mathematics very boring and won't learn much of it. If a brain gets lots of rewards for discovering other people's intentions, it will learn a lot of social cognition.\n\nLanguage might be the result of three things that are different in humans:\n- extended training periods per layer (after the respective layer is done, it is difficult to learn a new set of phonemes or the first language)\n- more layers\n- different internal rewards. Perhaps the reward for learning grammatical structure is the same that makes us like music. Our brains may enjoy learning compositional regular structure, and they enjoy making themselves understood, and everything else is something the universal cortical learning figures out on its own.\n\nThis is a hypothesis that is shared by a growing number of people these days. In humans, it is reflected for instance by the fact that races with faster motor development have lower IQ. (In individuals of the same group, slower development often indicates defects, of course.)\n\nAnother support comes from machine learning: we find that the same learning functions can learn visual and auditory pattern recognition, and even end-to-end-learning. Google has built automatic image recognition into their current photo app:\nhttp://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2015/07/01/google-mistakenly-tags-black-people-as-gorillas-showing-limits-of-algorithms/\n\nThe state of the art in research can do better than that: it can begin to \"imagine\" things. I.e. when the experimenter asks the system to \"dream\" what a certain object looks like, the system can produce a somewhat compelling image, which indicates that it is indeed learning visual structure. This stuff is something nobody could do a few months ago:\nhttp://www.creativeai.net/posts/Mv4WG6rdzAerZF7ch/synthesizing-preferred-inputs-via-deep-generator-networks\n\nA machine learning program that can learn how to play an Atari game without any human supervision or hand-crafted engineering (the feat that gave DeepMind 500M from Google) now just takes about 130 lines of Python code.\n\nThese models do not have interesting motivational systems, and a relatively simple architecture. They currently seem to mimic some of the stuff that goes on in the first few layers of the cortex. They learn object features, visual styles, lighting and rotation in 3d, and simple action policies. Almost everything else is missing. But there is a lot of enthusiasm that the field might be on the right track, and that we can learn motor simulations and intuitive physics soon. (The majority of the people in AI do not work on this, however. They try to improve the performance for the current benchmarks.)\n\nNoam's criticism of machine translation mostly applies to the Latent Semantic Analysis models that Google and others have been using for many years. These models map linguistic symbols to concepts, and relate concepts to each other, but they do not relate the concepts to \"proper\" mental representations of what objects and processes look like and how they interact. Concepts are probably one of the top layers of the learning hierarchy, i.e. they are acquired *after* we learn to simulate a mental world, not before. Classical linguists ignored the simulation of a mental world entirely.\n\nIt seems miraculous that purely conceptual machine translation works at all, but that is because concepts are shared between speakers, so the structure of the conceptual space can be inferred from the statistics of language use. But the statistics of language use have too little information to infer what objects look like and how they interact.\n\nMy own original ideas concern a few parts of the emerging understanding of what the brain does. The \"request-confirmation networks\" that I have introduced at a NIPS workshop in last the December are an attempt at modeling how the higher layers might self-organize into cognitive programs.\n\nCheers!\n\nJoscha"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time:\n\nno worry, if i understand correctly you are suggsting there are layers 1 through N. lets cal them L 1 - Ln. there are times T 1- Tn / and then conjecture that changing the time . correlations ( by genetic swtch or other method. , you might be able to make blacks smarter by changing the time for motor layer development and changing the time for other layers. . ). like telemeres for the cell , are their equivalents for the layers. . as you talked about culling the unused neurons in each layer, each neuron in each layer would get dfferent ( kill yourself if you are not being used instructions ).\n\nExactly. I looked up the statistics, black kids in the US have slower cognitive development (and never catch up), which the study of course attributed to social factors without any evidence, and they had faster motor development! I suspect this means their brains are slower at learning high-level concepts, because the low-level structures are optimized for a shorter time. But they will keep the lead in motor development, because it is easier to learn, and they have more time and attention to practice once they get the structures in place.\n\nIt could also be that they have an additional set of learning directives in place that adapts them better to a more hunting/running style of life, whereas the Europeans had to adapt for identifying long-term seasonal patterns, delayed gratification for agriculture etc.\n\nand CONCEPTS could be layer to layer communicaiton. . are gender differences also a matter of time, and structure of interactions. .\n\nI suspect gender differences are mostly motivational, i.e. we have a reward system for all the different social and cognitive needs, which makes us receive different kinds of pleasure and pain, thereby pay attention and learn. You cannot learn what does not attract your attention. Women tend to find abstract systems, conflicts and mechanisms intrinsically boring. Most women in computer science do not write programs because they enjoy solving puzzles, but because they want to help people, get approval etc. There are almost no women in math, because it does not help people or yield social attention.\n\nMen tend to find elaborate social relations boring. If there is no pleasure in observing and empathizing with people, one will not have good social cognition.\n\nIQ is not the only meaningful difference. Chinese pay an inordinate amount of attention to authority. I suspect historically., the authorities tended to kill them a lot if they did not. Jews tend be intellectually independent and anti-authoritarian, which might make them creative and inventive in ways that are hard to find in Asia.\n\nAt the moment, I think speed/quality of brain development plus motivational system are the key to understanding both mind and individual differences. Important part of human language might be the result in a motivational need to discover/invent grammatical structure, which as a side effect makes us interested in music.\n\nIt would mean that Chomsky's life long hypothesis, that people have a special circuit for grammatical language, is wrong. They might be GENERAL learners, just like Gorillas, but with a strong motivational urge to build grammatical structure, which the brain simply invents (there are only a few ways in which a natural language can work). That is much easier to wire into a brain than a specific circuit.\n\ni my self believe that african music, westrn music , chinese music are a window into the the structure of those layers. . western rigid, african primitve , chinese nature based, . I belive that synphoic movments best describe your layering, they open with a basic simple melody„ after it is learned, it is repeated and\" developed\" , inverted, distorted, related, etc. the development stage take a long time. then there is a recapitlaltion of the whole. and its inter and intra actions. . african musci has lots of beats. and little development. - no accident, it mirrors their learning process.\n\nInteresting question if music is somehow indicative of genetically defined prefs, but I am not sure. It could be path effects, starting in culture.\n\nre taboo\n, maybe climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation. . the earths forest fire. potentailly a good thing for the species\n\nMaking having children expensive in terms of upbringing and missed opportunity (like in the west) is a more humane way. Environmental stress while leaving near rock bottom tends to lead people to have more children, because there is no missed opportunity, and high mortality requires more attempts at procreation. Humans are a hardy species, outside of focused famine events and wars only small fractions of any given population die.\n\nI suspect that strong reductions in population will come from large-scale failure of agriculture. The climate change itself with result in migration and wars, but most people will probably survive that. But who knows, I might be wrong.\n\ntoo many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense\n\nis the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if the brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent\n\nThe radical idea of treating individuals in a society as cells and the society itself as a well-organized organism is fascism, or course. Probably the most efficient and rationally stringent way of governance, if someone could pull it off in a sustainable way; and if it is aggressive and expansive, its efficiency makes it a virus that everybody will want to stomp out. Fascism makes romantic doo-gooders like me very uncomfortable (I visited KZ Buchenwald five times and it had a profound influence on me; we East Germans inoculated ourselves very thoroughly against fascism), and the general public will not be willing to consider it.\n\nI rather like the treatment Fascism gets in the Amazon Series \"The Man in the High Castle\", which explores what would have happened if the Germans and Japanese had won the war: A society that tries to function as a brutal and ruthlessly efficient machine, eliminating all social and evolutionary slack. It is very dark, but not a flat caricature of pointless evil for its own sake. Heinlein's late book \"Starship Troopers\" explores fascism, too, but unlike Philipp K Dick he does not see it as a form of insanity, but as the most desirable order.\n\nI find your \"political incorrectness\" very fascinating. In the beginning, I thought it is a form of costly signaling, but now I think you are simply entirely unconstrained in your thoughts. How did you manage in your youth? Did you get in trouble, or did you keep your thoughts to yourself? I wonder what kind of person you want to transform into.\n\nIt was interesting to notice that at the Forbidden Research conference, nobody managed to say anything remotely out-of line. One large discussion group wanted to address the question of whether \"democracy still works\", and mostly expressed their disagreement with Trump. Ideology is like halitosis: easy to see in others, hard in oneself A speaker felt that the media \"stifle all criticism of Trump\", another wanted to remove \"men and Elon Musk from government\", and everybody strongly agreed that we need more diversity everywhere.\n\nI noticed some time ago that Joi has remarkable public communication skills. He picks controversial, insight-laden topics, but sanitizes them by carefully replacing the parts of content that would divide his audience with symbolic messages that everybody can fill with their own content in a way that resonates with them. The non-controversial parts will still be insightful. He manages to come across as very subversive, while rarely offending anyone (except the hard scientists, that miss hard substance).\n\nHe also asks influential people and smart students or faculty to write parts of his essays and speeches for him. This invests them in his success, especially because he is going to reward and acknowledge them. Very few of his ideas are original, instead he is good at identifying and testing thoughts he reads or hears from others.\n\nI am still beset by the ruinous instinct that the goal of communication ought to be mutual understanding. Joi is right. Public communication is about reaching one's goals.\n\nBests,\n\nJoscha"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 4:41", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Cells seem to be mostly indistinguishable (except for )04 I thought? Size is different on average, but males with small brains are still male. Variation of all traits is higher for males, so there are more high IQ men (wider bell-curve). Given average brain size difference, the small difference in average IQ is surprising, I think gender differenece. unlikely motivational, every cell is different. size is didfferent. . the more radical idea is that brains are the nucleus of the human\" cell: the body the membrane, the organizm the colletcions and interactions of brains, wisdom of crowds . mirroring. etc. . money used as signals. as is spoken language. . what does social behavior mean, it is the cooridination of indiv brains. =\n\nI think that mathematics based thinking does not allow for censorship. money people concepts if they are all math , then poliiical correctness and their structures are only subsets of a larger group of thoughts. its not emotinal for me.\n\nmost people have censorship built in at a deep level, social reasoning gets to different results than equivalent abstract reasoning"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 6:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "the average is the only thing that matters"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 24, 2016 00:20", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/24/2016 5:23:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Average humans are probably not fully able to learn how to program etc. Fraction of people that reshape the world are at the right end of the Bell curves, so difference in variation means fewer women. We tend to be more interested in the outliers. Have people explicitly evolved to be not to be too smart on average, or is general intelligence so hard to get from human brains?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031305.txt_3880
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031305.txt
subject:
  JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg <hoffenberg.steven@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Players2 . <playersO2@hotmail.com>"], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT", "subject": "JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "C EO STEVEN HOFFENBERG / TRUMP SUPER PAC/ GET OUR JOBS BACK INC\n\nTO ROGER STONE\n\nCHILD RAPE BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN NEW TELL ALL JAMES PATTERSON BOOK FE DS COVER UP NO FED ARREST OF MASS CHILD RAPIST BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN BO"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033362.txt_3885
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033362.txt
subject: Fwd: Apple, Inc.: Addressing The Top 5 Investor Questions
messages:
  [{"sender": "\"Morgan Stanley\" <ms-wmir@morganstanley.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 29, 2019 at 6:35:01 PM EDT", "subject": "Apple, Inc.: Addressing The Top 5 Investor Questions", "body": "Katy L. Huberty, CFA — Morgan Stanley\nMay 29, 2019 10:28 PM GMT\n\nGiven the risk of further restrictive trade measures, we answer investors' top questions. We expect\nshares to remain choppy, with a near-term floor around $160. Our estimates are unchanged but\npeer multiple contraction drives our SoTP-driven PT to $231 (from $240).\n\nWhat is the latest view on iPhone demand in China? On Apple's April 30th earnings call, CEO Tim\nCook noted that the November-December period was likely to be the trough in iPhone demand in\nChina, following an improvement in performance during the March quarter helped by iPhone price\ncuts, VAT tax rollbacks, increased financing options and better consumer confidence. Data from\npush-messaging service provider Jigaung shows that the improvement in iPhone demand likely\npersisted through April, where Apple gained over 175bps of Chinese smartphone installed base\nshare Y/Y (1). However, the increasingly tough trade rhetoric and actions recently taken by US and\nChinese authorities make it less likely this trend will continue into May/June. Late last week,\nfollowing the Huawei blacklist, President Trump commented that \"it's possible that Huawei would be\n________included in a trade deal\", suggesting recent actions could be bargaining chips to use in trade\nnegotiations that can be worked out by/around the G20 Summit in late June, but with Apple guiding\nJune quarter revenue down 8% Q/Q (vs. trailing 3 year seasonality of -14% Q/Q), the risk remains\nthat weaker near-term demand in China increases the risk of a revenue shortfall. For reference, we\nmodel 37M iPhone shipments in the June quarter (-10% Y/Y), in-line with iPhone builds, which\nimplies a 5th consecutive quarter of double digit iPhone shipment declines in China. If we assume\nChinese demand significantly weakens in the last 6 weeks of the quarter and iPhone shipments\ninstead fall 50% Y/Y (a 10 point further deceleration from March Q declines), then we'd expect 2.3M\nlower iPhone units (-6% vs. our current model), $1.6B lower revenue (-2.9%) and a $0.05 hit to EPS\n(-2"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 3:19:40 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Apple, Inc.: Addressing The Top 5 Investor Questions", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029895.txt_3896
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029895.txt
subject: RE: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didnt forget about this...\n\nStill working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo of | going forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "After Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032732.txt_3898
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032732.txt
subject: Re: Wheels up 3 to New York Wednesday
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2018 2:00:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Wheels up 3 to New York Wednesday", "body": "Thx 3pm Wednesday to Teterboro confirmed\nFriday Trump arrives in PBI, I'll confirm time,\nThx\nLarry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 18, 2018, at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Wheels up 3 to New York Wednesday", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030755.txt_3903
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030755.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 24 June 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Where are you? Not answering your cell\nWhat the f... Does going to open 1k down not good... Trump is saying its a great thing really???\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 24, 2016, at 6:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "5616557625"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 6:49 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is this the right # says its disconnected\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "6/24/2016 10:51:32 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "7626"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022941.txt_3906
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022941.txt
subject: Fwd: Fw: inquiry re: Giuffre v Maxwell settlement
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Matthew Hiltzik"], "timestamp": "5/24/2017 11:04:43 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: inquiry re: Giuffre v Maxwell settlement", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:53 PM", "subject": "Fw: inquiry re: Giuffre v Maxwell settlement", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Hill, James E.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 24, 2017 6:33 PM", "subject": "inquiry re: Giuffre v Maxwell settlement", "body": "Good afternoon, Marty: \nThis is James Hill at ABC News. \nDo you have any statement you wish to share on behalf of Mr. Epstein regarding the settlement reached in \nthe defamation suit filed by Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell? \nI know from the court filings and hearing transcripts, that Mr. Epstein was deposed in this action, but was not \nexpected to be called as a live trial witness. \nAccording to the transcripts - it was represented by plaintiff's counsel during pre-trial hearings, that Mr. \nEpstein invoked his 5th amendment rights and declined to answer substantive questions during the \ndeposition. It also appears that Judge Sweet had not yet made a final determination as to whether Mr. \nEpstein's depo, or selected portions thereof, would be admitted at trial (which is obviously a moot point, \nnow). \nIf you believe any of that to be in error, and/or if you wish to provide a statement about the settlement or in \nresponse to Giuffre's allegations about your client, please give me a call or reply to this email. \nIf you have no comment, I'd appreciate you letting me know that. \nThanks \nJames \nJames Hill \nSr. Producer \nABC News \n190 N. State St. \nChicago IL 60601 \n(cell) \n(cell) \n(ofc) \njames.e.hill@abc.com \n©jameshillabc \nVirus-free. www.avast.com"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025790.txt_3909
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025790.txt
subject: National Enquirer Comment Request Re: Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "jeevacation@gmail.com", "Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "1/29/2015 8:33:35 PM", "subject": "FW: National Enquirer Comment Request Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Gonzalez, Patricia", "recipients": ["Tonja Haddad Coleman"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 29, 2015 3:29 PM", "subject": "National Enquirer Comment Request Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Tonja--\n\nThe National ENQUIRER is preparing to publish a story that Bill Clinton used a private \"orgy\" jet to travel to \nBrunei for an extraordinary dinner with a royal accused of duping American women into \"white slavery.\" \nThe ENQUIRER will report that Bill was accompanied by the 727's owner, billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, \nwhen he landed in the tiny South-East Asian country on May 25, 2002. His entourage also included two \nwomen who allegedly worked as \"madams\" for Epstein, luring teenaged girls into sex trysts with the tycoon \nand his powerful and famous friends. \n\nAccording to The ENQUIRER's investigation, Bill spent the day playing golf at a seven-star hotel -- and then was \ninvited to dine with Brunei's sultan, Hassanal Bolkiah .....who was charged with holding a deeply-religious \nChristian beauty queen as a \"human chattel.\" Far from being embarrassed by the ruler's tawdry \nreputation, moreover, records for Bill's nonprofit foundation reveal that Brunei made a donation towards his \nClinton Presidential Library that year of between $1. million and $5 million. \n\nPlease kindly attempt to provide any comment by 4 pm ET tomorrow, Friday January 30th to Lachlan \nCartwright, Executive Editor, at [Office] or \n\nThank You, \nPatricia Gonzalez \nThe National Enquirer"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032054.txt_3910
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032054.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 16, 2017 3:14 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/alexander-acosta-trump-jeffrey-epstein-plea-235096"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I know...I just saw that and almost threw up....also have to decide today whether or not to take flynn"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 16, 2017 3:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/16/2017 11:51:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Would be conflicted out of everything to come"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018946.txt_3911
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018946.txt
subject: Re: 31E-MM-108062, 10/17/2006
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": "10/17/2006", "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 10/17/2006", "body": "the subpoena, she would be required to appear at the United\nStates District Courthouse located at 701 Clematis Street, West\nPalm Beach, Florida.\n\nAt this time, no further action will be taken by the\nin this matter. Lead is covered."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031339.txt_3922
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031339.txt
subject: Fwd: Obama team nixed fundraiser by attorney for sex offender pal of Bill Clinton, emails show
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/12/2016 1:28:18 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Obama team nixed fundraiser by attorney for sex offender pal of Bill Clinton, emails show", "body": "This guy black might be your lawyer and even a friend; but i have to say it seems to me he is much more about\nhimself than his clients.\n\nHe made a comment in a newspaper about a case of mine not long ago and he had no idea what he was talking\nabout; he should have been embarrassed. When i asked a reporter from one if the leading newspapers why the\nother paper had run his opinion about my casr when he knows nothing about it, she said his p.r. people email\nand others regularly with comments on all sorts if cases just hoping to get black's name in the paper in some\npseudo authoritative role. Pretty weak.\n\nGood luck, David"}, {"sender": "David Schocn <j>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, August 12, 2016", "subject": "Obama team nixed fundraiser by attorney for sex offender pal of Bill Clinton, emails show", "body": "I thought you might be interested in this article:\n\nOne of America’s top defense attorneys was deemed too controversial to host an event for President Obama,\naccording to newly surfaced emails, mainly because of one particular client — a jet-setting billionaire accused of\ntrafficking underage girls, who also happens to be close friends with Bill Clinton.\n\nhttp://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/08/12/obama-team-nixed-fundraiser-by-attorney-for-sex-offender-pal-\nbill-clinton-emails-show.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030999.txt_3925
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030999.txt
subject: Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rush, George", "recipients": ["Howard Rubenstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 08, 2009 11:08 PM", "subject": "Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Howard:\n\nWe’re working on a story for our Sunday column about Jeffrey Epstein. I thought I might send my questions to you tonight, so you’d have them first thing tomorrow."}, {"sender": "Howard Rubenstein", "recipients": ["Darren"], "timestamp": "October 9, 2009 7:26:54 AM PDT", "subject": "FW: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Darren:\nI hope you are well.\n\nSince we are no longer working for Jeffrey, I’m forwarding this Daily News request to you so you can handle it as you see fit.\n\nMany thanks,\n\nHoward"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger", "Robert D. Critton Jr."], "timestamp": "10/9/2009 4:43:25 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026499.txt_3929
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026499.txt
subject: Fwd: Our May conversation - more thoughts
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["BS Stern"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 9 2018 10:47 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Our May conversation - more thoughts", "body": "Hi all —\n\nI spent some time mulling additional aspects of a third choice presidential run and wanted to run five\n\nspecific attributes for a candidate by you as a group.\n\nThis much we know - the Fall elections are shaping up to be a referendum on the most divisive\nAmerican President in memory. The battle for potential Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh’s\nnomination this fall will only amplify the polarity of the political debate that is already deeply\noverwrought on both sides. The rising tide of pressure on Donald Trump from the Mueller investigation\n\nshows no sign of ebbing.\n\nUnless the underlying political dynamics are disrupted, the outcomes of these unprecedented events will\nstill leave us with the same unsatisfactory two front battlefield of the 2016 Presidential election.\nWatching these unrelenting, compounding events since our discussion in May, I am guessing we are all\nasking the same question: now what? For the 48 percent of Americans who believe Donald Trump\n\nshould not be in the White House, perhaps we too want our own “chaos” candidate in 2020?\n\nShould Trump run again, this could be a “break glass” moment for the majority of Americans who don’t\nsupport him. Do we want to break the genteel precedents of two parties running their ceremonious and\nseemingly illogical nominating process to select a candidate? (Why do Iowa and New Hampshire play\nsuch outsized roles? What kind of small-d democratic process relies on superdelegates?) The system\nfailed in 2016, with both parties producing terribly flawed candidates in a race to the bottom. We need to\n\nbuild a back-up plan in the event the system fails again."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030741.txt_3932
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030741.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ee"], "timestamp": "8 Nov 2018, at 19:39", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when are you arriving. traffic will be crazy . do to celebratons and trump"}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/8/2018 7:17:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes completely forgot about it\nI m flying in Friday night\nWould Saturday 11:00 be good for you?\n\nAriane de Rothschild"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030389.txt_3934
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030389.txt
subject: Re: What is going on with your man Jes?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 10:17 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "'Thanks for sharing the foxhole'"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 4:18 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "i know, everyone gets their turn in the barrel"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 10:22 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "Other stuff I am sympathetic --but to answer a random gmail email, that is not smart! How are you Trump contacts responding to Comey?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 11 2017 08:30 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "i tired to call you , not for email"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029881.txt_3938
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029881.txt
subject: RE: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didnt forget about this...\nStill working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo of GT going forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:31 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition will follow. Mr. Trump’s deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032915.txt_3945
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032915.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 2:53:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no intel but lots of profits"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bigger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.0 (as some are suggesting). I am just not sure who that person would be. The Trump trade certainly seems to have legs -- all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for making so much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030972.txt_3949
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030972.txt
subject: Re: FYI
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wo! [aaa"], "timestamp": "2/1/2019 4:11:28 PM", "subject": "Re: FYI", "body": "Needs edit but... ic 36! M_ Ryboloev not known in 05, Talk later"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 11:07 AM", "subject": "Re: FYI", "body": "Books and newspaper accounts of Trump’s 45 years in business were full of his shady dealings, and the presidency had only helped to highlight them and to surface even juicier ones. Real estate was the world's favorite money laundering currency and Trump's B-level real estate business was quite explicitly designed to appeal to money launderers. What’s more, Trump’s own financial woes, and desperate efforts to maintain billionaire lifestyle, cache, and market viability, forced him into constant and unsubtle schemes. Practically speaking, you couldn’t miss him, as the Mueller investigation appeared to be finding.\n\nIn November 2004, for instance, Jeffrey Epstein, the financier later caught in a scandal involving under-age prostitutes, agreed to buy out of bankruptcy a house in Palm Beach, Florida for $30 million—a house that had been on the market for two years. Epstein and Trump had been close friends—playboys in arms, as it were—for more than a decade, with Epstein often counseling Trump on his chaotic financial affairs. Epstein took Trump to see the Palm Beach house to advise him on construction issues involved with moving a swimming pool. As he prepared to finalize his deal for the house, an incredulous Epstein Saw a severely cash-constrained Trump bid $41 million for the property, buying it through an entity called Trump Properties LLC, financed by Deutsche Bank. Trump, Epstein knew, had been renting his name, telling Epstein he ought to do the same—that is, for an ample fee, Trump was willing to serve as a front man to disguise the actual ownership in a real estate transaction. (This was, in effect, just another variation of Trump’s basic business model of licensing his name for commercial properties owned by someone else.) A furious Epstein, suspecting that the real owner was a Russian oligarch, who Trump knew, Dmitry Rybolovlev—part of the close Putin circle of government-aligned industrialists in Russia—threatened to expose the deal, then getting extensive scrutiny in Florida papers. The fight became all the more bitter when, two months later, the house was put on the market for $125 million. Well known to Trump, who often saw Epstein at his current Palm Beach house, Epstein was visited almost every day, and had been for many years, by girls who he paid for massages with happy endings—girls recruited from local restaurants, strip clubs, and, also, Trump’s Mar-a-Lago. Just as the threats and enmity of the two friends increased over the house sale, Epstein found himself under investigation by local Palm Beach police. Epstein’s legal problems vastly escalated as the house, with only minor improvements, was bought for $96 million by Dmitry Rybolovlev. That is, Trump had either miraculously earned $55 million, without putting up a dime, or Rybolovlev, or someone such as Rybolovlev, paid Trump Properties, LLC—actual owner unknown—$96 million, thereby providing a clean payment of $55"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022766.txt_3950
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022766.txt
subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "4/22/2015 7:03:52 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "As just received."}, {"sender": "Hill, James E.", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22, 2015, 1:57 PM", "subject": "FW: inquiry from '1111111.MI.ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Marty: With the understanding that we have not yet made determinations about what will or will not be included in our broadcast, here are the bullet points of the principal allegations Ms. 11111.11111•11111111111 raised in the ABC interview regarding Mr. Epstein. I'm available on cell if you wish to discuss.\nWe'd ask for your response as soon as possible - best if by close of business Friday. Thanks. And I'm always available to talk to you if you wish to communicate with us.\nShe says in summer of 1999 when she was 15 - Ghislaine Maxwell approached and asked her if she was interested in a job as a masseuse.\nShe says she was later (that same day) driven by her father to Epstein's Palm Beach residence, where she massaged Epstein with Maxwell's guidance, and then she says she was made to have sex, to include intercourse, with Epstein. At conclusion she says was paid $200 and driven home by a butler..\nShe says she quit her job and went to work for Epstein within a couple of weeks encounter.\nShe says Epstein always knew how old she was andliiiiiiiiiifically that she, Epstein and celebrated 16th b-day together.\nShe says Epstein paid her for the encounters and for her apartment and car•\nShe says she would be expected to have sexual relations with Epstein up to several day•\nShe says there was an number of other girls young as 12.\nshe says she was given money by Epstein to go out and recruit other young girls for him.•\nshe says that while she was free to come and go - she felt like she was under his control and she didn't want to disappoint Epstein..\nShe says Epstein required her, and paid her, to have sex with many of his friends. •\nShe says these people included politicians, royalty, educators.\nShe says she had sex -or sexual activities - with Prince Andrew on three occasions - at the instruction of Epstein •\nShe says Epstein paid her $15,000 after the 1st of the three alleged encounters with Prince Andrew.\nShe says that Epstein showed her a video room in his NY home which had monitors showing cameras in many locations in the home.\nShe suggests Epstein made videos of underage girls with other people for purposes of potential blackmail •\nShe says that Epstein liked her to dress up in outfits, including bondage and schoolgirl outfits.\nShe says she met Bill Clinton on Epstein's island in the USVI. She does not specify a date but says she is 100% sure it was Clinton and it was on the island. She says she ate dinner with Epstein and Clinton but alleges nothing further regarding Clinton..\nShe says one person - who she wouldn't name - that Epstein loaned her out to - physically assaulted and raped her. She says this happened on Epstein's island, and that she had been sent by Epstein - alone -to meet this person . She says she screamed but no one came to her aid. She says she feared for her life. She says she told Epstein about the alleged beating and rape afterwards and she said he didn't care..\nShe says Epstein and Maxwell asked her to have a child for them and to sign a document signing away the rights to the child in the event that she and Epstein had a falling out. She says she refused this request..\nShe says Epstein has a sick problem, is a pedophile, a dangerous man who should not be walking free"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Hill, James E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "James, just confirming that you are sending me the bulletpoints from the interview you are asking about, thanks"}, {"sender": "Hill, James E.", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, April 21, 2015, 4:36 PM", "subject": "inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Greetings.\nThis is James Hill of ABC News. I write to you regarding Jeffrey Epstein - and your representation of him in the CVRA case in which he is an intervener. ABC News has recently conducted an on-camera interview with (formerly known as Jane Doe #3), portions of which are very likely to be airing on Good Morning America and other ABC programs this week. We would like to offer you an opportunity to respond to the allegations she has raised about Mr. Epstein. Can you tell me who among you I should be in contact with? Should you wish to make a statement or respond in any other manner - I will need it by close-of-business Wednesday. Thanks kindly,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026266.txt_3959
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026266.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 23, 2018, at 9:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "<IMG-7184.jpg>"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem <MI>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:36 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Is that Steve Bannon?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 3:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes We have become friends you will like him"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/25/2018 11:42:49 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Trump doesn't like him"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030410.txt_3966
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030410.txt
subject: whoopsie
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Brad S Karp"], "timestamp": "10/2/2018 11:26:53 PM", "subject": "whoopsie", "body": "https://www.marketwatch.com/story/new-york-launches-tax-investigation-into-trump-after-ny-times-report-2018-10-02"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026272.txt_3967
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026272.txt
subject: Re: SB
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/23/2018 1:57:50 PM", "subject": "Re: SB", "body": "I think his FT performance yesterday was quite a hit (btw, he reiterated that my book was all true--helpful!). \nCuriously, the liberals maybe more fascinated by him than the Trump base is."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:51 AM", "subject": "Re: SB", "body": "i passsed on your newsweek message yesterday. i think he is a bit lost no wins and donald off the rails"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:01 AM", "subject": "Re: SB", "body": "I reached out and I'm seeing him at 6:00 today."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030966.txt_3979
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030966.txt
subject: Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "-firing-federal-reserve-chief-after-latest-interest-"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 1:59:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "should have been done months ago too old!!!!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026514.txt_3985
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026514.txt
subject: Re: Home
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Home", "body": "Why had no one interviewed some of trump classmates at wharton ? Deutsh bank papers very bery bad"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Home", "body": "Where are you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/23/2019 12:53:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Home", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030376.txt_3987
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030376.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie SpineIla"], "timestamp": "10/15/2014 1:06:39 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-10-14/ruemmler-said-to-emerge-as-obama-favorite-for-justice-job.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033027.txt_3991
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033027.txt
subject: Re: Interview with Futurism
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "Jeffrey, https://futurism.com/ editor (fast-growing media about science with over 25M unique readers)\nwould like to have an interview with you. Same topic: Trump's cuts on science and your philanthropy.\n\nWould you be open to talk to them?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, 11:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes happy to do in person"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "great. when is good?\nare you coming to New York next week?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, 11:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "Scheduled. Would you have 30 min - 1 h before/after. Will tell you some more ideas about your interviews and\nscience support"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/12/2017 5:07:38 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "Yes"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031040.txt_4006
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031040.txt
subject: Re: A few questions just in case please?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/15/2013 12:59:34 PM", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": "Call"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, December 15, 2013", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": "Thank you! Was amazing! The best family dinner ever. Louis said they LOVED me! Thu both texted him afterwards saying that:)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, December 14, 2013", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": "how will our future differ from your lives? if i was going to do your job what three things would i have to know. ? is obama good for the country, . ? israel?. if you could live one day of your lives over again, what would it be?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 7:04 PM", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028590.txt_4009
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028590.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 11:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "So....remarkably...in the middle of dealing with thiss the Steptoe numbercrunchers advise me Jeffrey has paid\nabout 450 and owes about 300 and seems disinclined to make Steptoe whole.....hAhhhhmmmm....first reaction is\ndéja vu.... How the fuck are we back here after the unspeakably awful evan barr debacle.... More to the point just\ntell me where you are on this....did miller fuck up? Something else? As you know | am the 800 pound gorilla\nhere, Steptoe is not going to chase you down for the money but there are 500 lawyers here, processes, etc......"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "i suggest we wait until face to face yes he fucked up. but ,,,"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 11:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Ok....but give me an idea what follows the but....otherwise | will imagine the worst...."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "im not sheyl, frankly i havent been involved in this at all except for the ridiculousness . we will resolve\nit by end of month. ."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 25, 2019 10:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Rajeev misra....softbank vision fund...any special jeffrey insights here?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 25, 2019 7:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If he wants you to rep him. YES"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Cal me if you get a chance....212 506 3914"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029856.txt_4010
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029856.txt
subject: Re: Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/22/2017 8:41:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "fun"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid iii", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "Parker, Ashley", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 22, 2017 3:19 PM", "subject": "WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Hi Reid,\n\nAshley Parker here at the Washington Post. I cover the White House and am emailing because my colleague,\nBob Costa, and I getting ready to post a story about President Trump’s decision to move ahead with retaining\noutside counsel, and we understand you’re one of the finalists for the role, and have already spoken with senior\nWhite House officials. I just wanted to let you know that we plan to mention your name (and of course see if\nyou want to comment), and I also wanted to check and see if you were open to chatting totally off the record,\njust in case there is any nuance or guidance you’d like to provide. I’m at] or my desk is I\n\nThanks,\nAshley\n\nAshley Parker\n\nDesk:\n\nTwitter: @AshleyRParker"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033389.txt_4012
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033389.txt
subject: Re: Friday POTUS
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "1/9/2018 1:22:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Friday POTUS", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Friday POTUS", "body": "Jeffrey\nBoston / Bedford are not gateway airports to PBI.\nOnly airports that are gateway into Palm Beach are:\nWhite Plains\nTeterboro\nOrlando\nDulles\nOrlando\nFortlauderdale\nMost operators are using Boca for arrivals when Trump is in town. Parking reservation at Boca are required\nsince the ramp fill up. Other options is Fort Lauderdale when Boca is full.\nPOTUS arrival — Friday, January 12th, time TBD (likely PM)\nPOTUS departure — Monday, January 15th, time TBD (likely PM)\nShould I request parking at Boca?\nThx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027036.txt_4019
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027036.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:50 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "does the 23 work in cambridge"}, {"sender": "Lisa New <_EE>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Absolutely. 23rd is great. I teach my seminar that day at 1 but could tape in the morning or after class--in my office (very private), or at the Harvardx studios (less) or in the Woodberry poetry room (the nicest place). . If Woody wanted, we could bring some students into the taping or just do the two of us...\n\nWoody is absolutely welcome to come to the seminar, of course\nJohn McCain, Tony Kushner, Al Gore have all signed on the last 2 days...crazy"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/5/2013 7:26:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Or we could do the taping at my house. That would be totally delightful too"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031732.txt_4032
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031732.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 7:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Went to opening of war paint last night was sitting next to john Connolly at after party he is on to his next book about Ef Hutton murders apparently was going to put me in your book because I was in your visitors list but somers and Margo nederlander asked him not to which pisses me off I have never been in a big book before and I think it would have been great and they never even asked me I told him about how you called Apple best jonathan"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 8:06:20 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im happy to meet him"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 8:11 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you want me to arrange it? be careful jf"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 8:21:25 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why dont you suggest to him that the real money making book is getting to the truth of the claims. unvierstiy of virgina. no penalty for fals accusations. . hockey team no penalty for accusations. . trump 13 yeara old rape accusation no penaltiy etc. mine is ripe with same"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 12:28:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i asked him about trump and russians he said maybe some truth there,If you want to meet him just give me the wordjf"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028505.txt_4041
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028505.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/16/2017 12:23:00 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Saw Matt C with DTF at golf tournament I know why he was there"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033033.txt_4047
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033033.txt
subject: Fwd: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now’"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "see you then :)"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 13, 2017, at 12:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hi habebey .. i m in new york .. the sooner we meet the faster i go back to be with my son on his first week in a\nnew school ..\n\nif you bussy dont worry 1 can wait until thursday ..\n\nthnx again"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "Sep 13, 2017, at 4:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wed at 2?"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "perfect & &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "9/13/2017 1:29:54 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021416.txt_4056
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021416.txt
subject: Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 3:22:48 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Thanks.. I need to get this or something to them quickly. I do feel the need to respond to each of their claims otherwise they would say I don’t deny them.. Will include a short preamble. I am going to cc the letter to the Buzzfeed lawyers. I figure I will see whether the buzzfeed story gets any traction at all, or appears before putting on my web site, or tweeting and facebooking it.\n\nLMK"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 11, 2017, at 4:18 AM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "normaly thier strategy will be to take back your defense to the accusers. and attack each one. if they find you are right they will leave out. and only go with the conflicted. I think you should include short concise cover letter. that you would like published in it entirety. it can refence your attacjment that you will put on your web site? . that goes into more details but in general , these are false. they were either investigated and found lacking or ignored. etc. often they throw out the near publishing date merely to get you to ansser."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 7:53 AM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "a few more minor changes.. one in first line of second paragraph and one misspelling corrected..so you can read this one:"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 10, 2017, at 10:31 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Second Draft:\n\n| appreciate the opportunity to respond to your email. While | am running the risk that you will report my comments, if you do, either out of context, or incompletely, | am responding with an effort to be complete. It is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements on your part. | treat people | interact with with respect, and | work hard"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019330.txt_4089
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019330.txt
subject: Re: Thank You from Lisa and Poetry in America
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "12/19/2016 3:01:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Thank You from Lisa and Poetry in America", "body": "from barnaby -\n\nshe could apply, but she should know that there are only a few grants in each round; most projects proposed\ndon't get funding. It is like rolling the dice. what people don't understand is that many grants are not funded not\nbecause they are defective in any way, but simply because there is not enough funding to cover even a part of\nwhat comes in (there are thousands of applications and hundreds of millions of dollars of requests that go all\nthrough different kinds of review; it is hard to know what will make it through because different people make\nthe priority decisions at different stages of review; and it depends what other applications are in the pool ina\ngiven cycle). There is no \"direct\" route anymore."}, {"sender": "Lisa New <Q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Thank You from Lisa and Poetry in America", "body": "Dear\nJeffrey\n(and please see note at bottom),\n\nThis end-of-the-year letter is to catch you up on developments and to report progress made in 2016\nby Poetry in America, by its associated non-profit production company, Verse Video Education, and\nby (and with) our new Harvard partner, the Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning. Whether\nyou are a longstanding adviser and supporter of Poetry in America, or you’ve more recently joined\nour circle of proponents, your contributions, thought partnership and enthusiasm have made this\nyear’s successes possible.\n\nLast fall, | knew this would be a crucial year. Goals for 2016 included moving our co-produced\ntelevision series, Poetry in America, toward a concrete release date (now entering post-production,\nwe launch nationwide in April 2018), converting our six HarvardX MOOC modules into for-credit\ncourses (now complete and being offered by Harvard’s Division of Continuing Education), and\ngetting the word out on our first course developed especially for K-12 educators, Poetry in America\nfor Teachers: The City from Whitman to Hip Hop. With a mission of creating and distributing the\nhighest-quality humanities content for a wide variety of learners, our projects now rely on a salaried\nproduction staff of five, a rotating corps of part timers and contractors, and a growing cohort of\nHarvard graduate students, undergraduates and interns whom we train in the public-facing\nhumanities. Growing fast, in 2016 we more firmly established Verse Video Education as a nimble\nand stable producer of humanities-based content (now including an archive of over 120 separate\ninterviews with distinguished discussants), while also defining a forward-looking partnership and\ngrowth strategy with Harvard. As 2016 draws to a close, | have much progress to report.\n\nVerse Video Education: Independent 501c3\n\nIn April 2016, Verse Video Education, the fledgling production company |’d founded in 2014,\nreceived IRS approval and became a 501c3. Now capable of accepting philanthropic contributions,\nVerse Video Education has also begun to generate revenue by producing high-quality educational\nmedia for other institutions. Clients within our first year included Greenwich Country Day School,\nYIVO Institute for Jewish Research, Schlesinger Library, Harvard Institute for Global Health, and\nProject Zero. While philanthropic donations remain essential, work for clients allows us to amplify the\nimpact of philanthropic donations, not only permitting additional investment in our flagship\npartnerships with WGBH and Harvard, but also fostering development of new partnerships and"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028591.txt_4091
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028591.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Crim"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Still have to figure out what my role is in all this shit..."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you seemed to imply that your new guy could only shoot blanks? ifthats so. its an easy decision. , if not. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not my new guy...not repping him"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think he has the goods?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026006.txt_4092
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026006.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:23 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Hope she is pleased/happy/satisfied/proud"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 11, 2016 8:16 PM", "subject": null, "body": "your girl won"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019324.txt_4094
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019324.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Maria Luisa", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon", "Preate Alexandra"], "timestamp": "July 22, 2018 at 9:11:58 AM EDT", "subject": null, "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031489.txt_4097
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031489.txt
subject:
  Fwd: Breaking News: Donald Trump brags in vulgar terms about groping women in a 2005 recording, saying, "When you're a star they let you do it"

messages:
  [{"sender": "Stephen Hanson", "recipients": ["Jeffrey / E / Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri 10/7/2016 10:30:45 PM (UTC)", "subject": "Fwd: Breaking News: Donald Trump brags in vulgar terms about groping women in a 2005 recording, saying, \"When you're a star they let you do it\"", "body": "Ouch\n\nSent from my iPad"}, {"sender": "NYTimes.com News Alert <nytdirect@nytimes.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 7, 2016 at 5:40:40 PM EDT", "subject": "Breaking News: Donald Trump brags in vulgar terms about groping women in a 2005 recording, saying, \"When you're a star they let you do it\"", "body": "Donald Trump brags in vulgar terms about groping women in a 2005 recording, saying, “When you re a star they let you do it”\n\nDonald J. Trump was caught on tape bragging in vulgar terms about making sexual"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021403.txt_4102
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021403.txt
subject: Fwd: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Mike Sitrick aaaaaaaaammmeemes"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 1:10:38 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Darren <>", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:11 AM", "subject": "Fw:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "\"Wolfe, Alexandra\"", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/07/2011 02:04 PM EST", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Dear Mr. Lefkowitz,\n\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein. Would he be available to answer any of these on the phone or by email? People have told me some of his thoughts on background but I wanted to see if he could tell me or email me anything directly I could use on the record. Also I'd like to run the information I already have by you or him.\n\nThank you,\nAlexandra\n\n-What is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation? Could he talk about his interest in science and the 2011 grants/conference?\n\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the same clients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion?\n\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? With whom was he working/advising?\n-Where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago?\n\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n\n-What were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction?\n\n-What does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why?\n\n-What is his side of the story and have people been supportive?\n\n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030797.txt_4110
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030797.txt
subject: Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sun, 19 Aug 2018 22:17:38 -0400", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "AHHHH thats more like it, , we need to find you the exorcist hat. ! . do you think you might want to\ncome to europe?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 9:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "https://www.newsobserver.com/news/business/article2 16997195 .html"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Aug 19, 2018, at 10:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "yes . no worry, november too important to risk diversion. mission first"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 10:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "Yes\n\nbut let's discuss--their is a crazed jihad against u--ive never seen anything like it--and I've seen a lot"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 10:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "Exactly\n\nBut somebody big has u in the gunsights"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "8/20/2018 2:34:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "any ideas ?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033388.txt_4123
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033388.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjon Jagland"], "timestamp": "4/16/2017 3:12:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I'll be better I feel terrible having to cut your stay short. There is much going on . Many investigations will begin"}, {"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Hope you recover quickly. We have had wonderful days. Tell me when you are coming to Paris so that we can talk. I really don't understand Trump. Today I have to deal with the referendum in Turkey. Endogan is another difficult to understand"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012711.txt_4124
source_file: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012711.txt
subject: RE: Events this week
messages:
  [{"sender": "Stephanie", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "Lesley Grof"], "timestamp": "6/14/2011 4:54:35 PM", "subject": "RE: Events this week", "body": "Other events that are not listed below (they were sent over from Marshall Heyman at the WSJ) Let me know if you are interested.\n\nTonight: Red Rooster for Halle Berry, Simon & Schuster party for publication of the new James Bond Novel & the opening of Spiderman w/ an after party at bowlmore.\n\nWednesday: Self Magazine & Zooey Deschanel Party\n\nThursday: Worldwide Orphans w/ Amy Poehler"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026273.txt_4129
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026273.txt
subject: Fwd: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rivkin, David", "recipients": ["Grossman, Andrew M"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 22, 2018 at 7:50 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Can you please send me WSJ op Ed. Tx"}, {"sender": "Grossman, Andrew M", "recipients": ["Rivkin, David"], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 12:56:55 AM EDT", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Mueller's Fruit of the Poisonous Tree\n\nIt makes no difference how honorable he is. His investigation is tainted by the bias that attended its origin in 2016.\n\nBy\nDavid B. Rivkin Jr. and\nElizabeth Price Foley\nJune 22, 2018 6:38 p.m. ET"}, {"sender": "Rivkin, David", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 8:14:49 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Here it is."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/23/2018 12:44:08 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Big deal"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030411.txt_4131
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030411.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/31/2019 10:47:52 PM", "subject": null, "body": "_____________ worked at mara lago. . she was the one that accused prince andrew. . trump said he asked \nme to resign, never a member ever. . of course he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030377.txt_4136
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030377.txt
subject: Re: Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Pegg <dpegg@theguardian.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "5 January 2015 at 11:14", "subject": "Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Swiss Accounts Survey\n\nDear Mr Epstein,\n\nWe are writing because a US media organisation, in concert with ourselves at the Guardian newspaper in London, is currently conducting a detailed survey of Swiss bank accounts, past and present.\n\nIt is not illegal to have Swiss accounts. But as you may know, it is a topic of considerable public debate, and several governments have been investigating the owners of such accounts.\n\nThere are a number of ways such accounts and also offshore trusts have been used to avoid inheritance tax, UK domestic tax, or tax imposed by other countries. Such accounts have also been used to launder money.\n\nWe have seen records held in the US identifying you among those who have held accounts. These accounts contained assets of up to USD 3.5m, and include:\nHSBC (Suisse) SA\nFAMILY INTEREST L.P.\n22079\nBESSIE\nJEFFREY EPSTEIN\n\n1) You may therefore have been a person evading or avoiding tax, or laundering money.\nWe will be particularly concerned with these questions:\n2) Why you had Swiss accounts.\n3) How much back tax you have settled with the tax authorities following their investigation of your affairs.\n\nAdditionally, from public records and from material we have seen we note that:\n4) In 2008 you pleaded guilty to solicitation of prostitution and procuring minors for prostitution. You were sentenced to 18 months in prison.\n5) Your above accounts were also linked with Mr Leslie Wexner.\n6) You are known to be or have previously been closely associated with Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and Kevin Spacey.\n7) You have made substantial contributions to the Clintons' philanthropic causes. Tax reform campaigners have previously been critical of those who engage in public life or the political process while avoiding or evading tax. Hilary Clinton herself, speaking in 2012, noted the importance of elites paying a substantial share of tax: \"One of the issues that I have been preaching about around the world is collecting taxes in an equitable manner — especially from the elites in every country.\"\n\nIt is intended shortly to publish the results of our survey in both the US and the UK.\n\nAs responsible journalists acting in the public interest, we would first like to give you the opportunity to comment.\n\nIf we do not hear from you by 18:00 on Monday 12th January 2015 (preferably by email to [redacted]), we shall proceed on the basis that you do not wish to comment on or amend our information.\n\nBut we have approached you in a straightforward fashion and hope you will take this opportunity to respond if you wish. Your substantive responses to each of our numbered points will be carefully considered and published if appropriate.\n\n(For the avoidance of doubt, we do not normally regard any generalised assertion of \"inaccuracies\" as a substantive response; nor any generalised statement that the holders acted on advice. Neither will we regard as substantive any comment that only refers to the present state of affairs and not to the past.)\n\nWe are, of course, happy to discuss directly any concerns you may have.\n\nWe would be most grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this letter. This will save us from chasing.\n\nYours faithfully,\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org"], "timestamp": "29 January 2015 at 16:49", "subject": "Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein,\n\nI write further to an email sent to you earlier this month, concerning an article we are preparing for publication in which you may be mentioned.\n\nWe have not received a response from you. If you wish to respond, please do so as soon as possible and no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nFor your convenience, please see the original letter below.\n\nYours faithfully,\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 30, 2015 12:00 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg,\n\nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London.\n\nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.\n\nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to which he has not responded.\n\nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his response by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email.\n\nYours faithfully,\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:03 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 7:04:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031069.txt_4137
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031069.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Dear Professor Krauss,\n\nWe met briefly after your talk in Ithaca a few months ago — I'm the girl on The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. I've really enjoyed your talks and books, but I was surprised to see you quoted in the Daily Beast recently defending Jeffrey Epstein:\n\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/\n\nCan you confirm if the following quote is accurate?\n\n\"If anything, the unfortunate period he suffered has caused him to really think about what he wants to do with his money and his time, and support knowledge,\" says Krauss. \"Jeffrey has surrounded himself with beautiful women and young women but they're not as young as the ones that were claimed. As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.\" Though colleagues have criticized him over his relationship with Epstein, Krauss insists, \"I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.\"\n\nThanks,\nRebecca Watson"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "yes it is.. Based on my direct experience with Jeffrey, which is all I can base my assessment on, he is a thoughtful, kind, considerate man who is generous to his friends, and all of the women I have known who have been associated with Jeffrey speak glowingly in the same words..\n\nwhy are you asking?"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Thanks for getting back to me. I was asking because I found the quote shocking . . . the evidence against Epstein is overwhelming and he's even pled guilty to paying for sex with a minor. It's in no way scientific or rational to assume that because you never saw him with an underage girl he must actually be innocent. It is possible for a person to be kind and generous with his friends but still a criminal paying for sex with underage girls in his private life.\n\nI'm going to write about the topic on Skepchick, and I'll include any additional statement you'd like if you want to provide more context or if you've changed your mind.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with Jeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peopleI know and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of. I know it is not politically correct to say that, because in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of the young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, and I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?\n\nLawrence Krauss\nFoundation Professor\nSchool of Earth and Space Exploration and Physics Dept.\nCo-director, Cosmology Initiative\nand Director, Origins initiative\nArizona State University"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:58:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "people are now throwing out my books, according to her blog.. more nonsense.."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026515.txt_4139
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026515.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Why had no one interviewed some of trump classmates at wharton ? Deutsh bank papers very bery bad"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:24 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Where are you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:53 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Free afternoon"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Lunch tomorrow? Or after? I have 4:00 appt. anytime before works."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/23/2019 1:11:24 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Great"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022773.txt_4143
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022773.txt
subject: Help!
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 19, 2016 6:39 PM", "subject": "Help!", "body": "Because you were not available to meet me in person last year and at this point I don't need to be seen. I can not have press, media, private investigators, film companies, etc. contacting me or my parents and sisters at home or on cell/texts and or by mail. I realize you don't have much control over this, but you can at least help me to move. I can't just get up and go like you. I left the city to escape, make a better life and I am devastated these people found me and brought to light an association of that I would rather them never to know. People think I was involved with something really bad and I lost a boyfriend of great potential over this shit. I am still in debt over all these years, been working my ass off trying to get ahead, which you could never understand I was even surviving off the pay I was getting. Well, its not any better. I dropped out of college because of you (and GM's) advice. Started working for a company you wanted me to and basically my life has has become hell since then. I have been your supporter for 16 years, the media explosion with Clinton, Trump and Cosby is affecting me. I'm not prepared for this."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 19, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate it. I should be back feb 14,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Appreciate what? I'm not sure you do. Be back for what? Where? I don't need to be photographed. I am trying to avoid that, hence the reason why I moved out here. I don't need people coming here looking for me to give them information about you or the \"people\" I was documented with... It's not my property. I don't think you get it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate your support is what i meant. has anyting happened recently? it is my birthday today"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 21, 2016 12:19 AM", "subject": "Help!", "body": "Happy birthday, I remember the few I had spent with you, good memories! The problem is that you may appreciate my support but that doesn't help me. Yes, I told you I can't have people coming here to ask about you and ex pals.... My landlord may shoot them. He is pissed. I need your help. Out of all the people you should be helping is someone who actually genuinely cared about you.i realize you're living the good life and I'm not your concern, but if you really appreciated my support then you'd help me otherwise I don't know what I'll do."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030967.txt_4145
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030967.txt
subject: Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon [nas"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 2:17:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "powells statment at his press conference were inane. . suffers from , this is what was done in the past.\n!!! BEFORE the internet. . the numbers they look at are not reflective of todays economy, . AT ALL."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "https://thehill.com/policy/finance/422577-trump-considering-firing-federal-reserve-chief-after-latest-interest-rate-hike"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025533.txt_4153
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025533.txt
subject: Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas D. Williams <thomasdwilliams@breitbart.com>", "recipients": ["Oliver Lane", "Raheem Kassam", "Alexander Marlow", "Frances Martel", "Adrienne Ross"], "timestamp": "March 11, 2018 at 5:13:03 PM GMT+1", "subject": "Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "Germans get it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 11, 2018, at 8:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "luv it"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "Pretty powerful"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 11, 2018, at 9:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "Unfortunately I just spoke to one of the country leaders that we discussed, , I will fly there tomorw night\n\nnow and then to new york wednesday night. sorry. will be in new york thurs and friday. we should lay\nouta strategy plan.. how much fun... travel safe."}, {"sender": "Sean Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/11/2018 8:08:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "Roger that. Thanks for having us today."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt_4154
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "<> or TS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are we meeting in new york?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<> or TS"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": "<> or TS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now'\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<> or TS"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when is good for you? late thurs? fri lunch whatever you prefer."}, {"sender": "<>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<> or TS"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "see you then :)"}, {"sender": "<> or TS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hi habebey .. i m in new york .. the sooner we meet the faster i go back to be with my son on his first week in a\nnew school ..\n\nif you bussy dont worry i can wait until thursday ..\n\nthnx again\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<> or TS"], "timestamp": "Sep 13, 2017, at 4:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wed at 2?"}, {"sender": "TS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/13/2017 5:31:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in my car at your door .. can i ring or 2 sharp?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032914.txt_4156
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032914.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jabor Y."], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "in paris today, headed for new york. . trump gives many new things to do"}, {"sender": "Jabor Y. <____________________>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wish you a safe trip back. Congratulations on your new president. You are made to handle all uncertainties and meet new challenges. Wish you the best and assure you of all my possible support. I am in contact with the Sharia guys and hope to come back to you next week regarding the e-currency. Look forward to see you in Marrakech or in NY if nothing works out."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jabor Y."], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:19:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When marrahesh ? Is it definite"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019318.txt_4159
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019318.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Maria Luisa", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "July 22, 2018 at 9:11:58 AM EDT", "subject": null, "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029154.txt_4163
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029154.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Haig, David", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/19/2018 3:19:49 AM", "subject": null, "body": "dear men\ni am writing you both because i am attaching a still not-quite-complete response to Peter Richerson, a gene-culture co-evolutionist—without the genes\ni do so because four lines down i tell the \"Gruterites\"—Gordon Getty's echo chamber—that i have added you two to the list\nso here is your chance to say \"no way\" and i will delete that from the message and likewise not ask Gruter's assistant to add your names to the list\nhaving said that, i find Gordon's missives much less burdensome than those from EDGE and certainly without the egomaniacal nonsense that infects John Brockman—the key is to get the brightest minds in a room and have them tell each other what they think is most important—or some such nonsense\nneither David nor i can think of a single scientific advance achieved that way—most of what we do is simply concentrated sustained thought directed toward the foundations of a problem\ni doubt Jeffrey has made a huge amount of money via the EDGE program\nunless you say otherwise, i will shortly send you the key Getty missives in which he asserts, i believe correctly, that Trump is an archetypal narcissistic psychopath—or whatever the precise term is—and that he must be opposed with full force on that basis\nmeanwhile, David has heard plenty about you Jeffrey, a financial/mathematical mind of exceptional quality and you should know that David is one of the very top evolutionary geneticists still breathing and my teacher on every detail large and small\nin haste and all best\nbob"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026267.txt_4164
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026267.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 23, 2018, at 9:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "<IMG-7184.jpg>"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is that Steve Bannon?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 3:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes We have become friends you will like him"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump doesn't like him"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "dont belive thepress"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/25/2018 1:25:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031338.txt_4173
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031338.txt
subject: Fw: Google Alert - jeffrey epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "G Maxwell [GMax1@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["J Jep [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/28/2015 3:47:18 AM", "subject": "Fw: Google Alert - jeffrey epstein", "body": "Check out trump"}, {"sender": "Google Alerts <googlealerts-noreply@google.com>", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Friday, 27 February 2015 21:00", "subject": "Google Alert - jeffrey epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029658.txt_4180
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029658.txt
subject: Re: Keating Interview
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Katherine Keating"], "timestamp": "10/28/2011 4:32:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Keating Interview", "body": "Are you here\n\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031096.txt_4181
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031096.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["G Maxwell [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:12", "subject": "Re:", "body": "inital respone, too many unanswerd question raised, realtionship with jeffrey/, ? you and clinton? her and andrew? whats the deal here? why is she there . this is who i am, this how i know jeffrey, employed from „ to.. . I was aware that jeffrey hired masag people, I sometine hired them, she was one of them. recolletion empllyed, firmative. . what. I am writing to writin to respond to the alleagtinoin that have been made whcich are categoricly untrue. . during hte time i met mr derhsowiz , in general inviting a subpeona. ? you will never answer questions to the press satisfaction they will not be persuaded."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:18", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes„"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:31", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i am on the phone with other attny getting you an answer."}, {"sender": "G Maxwell [gmax1@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I need it written out in full."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["G Maxwell [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 3:31:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "that is the best advice can you call me now. i must get on the boat."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032727.txt_4182
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032727.txt
subject: Obama admin discussed how much to share about Russia with incoming Trump team - CNNPolitics
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/13/2018 2:16:57 PM", "subject": "Obama admin discussed how much to share about Russia with incoming Trump team - CNNPolitics", "body": "https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/12/politics/susan-rice-email-russia-investigation-trump-team/index.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032157.txt_4183
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032157.txt
subject: Re: Huffington Post
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Fri Jul 01 07:18:25 2011", "subject": "Re: Huffington Post", "body": "should you point out to Ariana Huff, that the same type of person, same as strauss Kahn 1s Andrews accuser, ,long criminal record.\ntotal liar. Ariana should champion the dangers of false allegations. send a reporter or reporters to investigate,... the palace would love\nit, the girl in the photo , was nothing more than a telephone answerer,, she was never 15, according to her version she worked for\ntrump , first at that age, at MAra lago. ITs ridiculous. but the press like strauss kahn 1s afraid to question women."}, {"sender": "Pegey Sicga!", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/1/2011 6:43:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Huffington Post", "body": "If you rewrite your last email in better grammar, (and so I have a better understanding) I can cut and paste and send it to Arianna\nHuffington from me.....\n\nDid you know why Prince Albert's Charlene fled to the airport with a one way ticket back to South Africa? Because she found out\nabout a third illegitimate child that is 3 months old...the palace officials followed her to the airport and propably made her an offer she\ncould not refuse...will get details from Jim Coleman when he comes home Sunday night.\n\nIn Southampton now. Peg"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029880.txt_4184
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029880.txt
subject: FW: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Robert D. Critton Jr."], "timestamp": "8/11/2009 6:55:54 PM", "subject": "FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Yes — we are still trying to get the details though"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Does this mean you have service on Maxwell"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030740.txt_4191
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030740.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/5/2018 7:35:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was thinking of opening with you and Bannon talking about Trump. Would let you sound smart and offer what\nI think would be a crowd-pleasing perspective, and make you seem like a credible player--former friend of\nTrump, advisor to world leaders, sought after person, etc--without having to too much rehash old stuff.\n\nDoesn't seem like they can win...but who knows. I'm meeting Bannon had 3 tomorrow and will stay with him\nuntil the end."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 2:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if the republicans pull this off, steve would deserve most of the credit. . he was way out in front on this way\nout. .. execution not to his liking but...... on another note , what were you thinking about me in the\n\nbook, with what moniker"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032733.txt_4206
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032733.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/20/2018 6:44:20 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i think this is a good point Jeffrey but i do think they are rarely sacrificed—certainly not Saddam or the sadistic \nAssads or Donald \nhave you heard that Genghis Khan—for all i know a gentle nomadic warrior—left 5 million Y chromosomes in \nhis wake, surviving today? \n45% of marriages in Iraq are with first cousins of the doubly paternal kind—father's brother's child and this has \nbeen said to lead to easy fracturing of the country which only a powerful dictator like Saddam could contain \nof course \"we\" destroyed the country and it lies in ruins now—one end to the other \nleave tomorrow for Ft Lauderdale and then Sunday on to California \nas always, if you have an hour or so i will be there \nall best"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i think you might be missing the benefit of the psycopath to the group. he is the defender easily \nsacrificed, but strkes fear in the heart of the other tribes, they are needed as best warriors"}, {"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["dear men"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "dear men \ni am writing you both because i am attaching a still not-quite-complete response to Peter Richerson, a gene-\nculture co-evolutionist—without the genes \ni do so because four lines down i tell the \"Gruterites\"—Gordon Getty's echo chamber—that i have added you \ntwo to the list \nso here is your chance to say \"no way\" and i will delete that from the message and likewise not ask Gruter's \nassistant to add your names to the list \nhaving said that, i find Gordon's missives much less burdensome than those from EDGE and certainly without \nthe egomaniacal nonsense that infects John Brockman—the key is to get the brightest minds in a room and \nhave them tell each other what they think is most important—or some such nonsense \nneither David nor i can think of a single scientific advance achieved that way—most of what we do is simply \nconcentrated sustained thought directed toward the foundations of a problem \ni doubt Jeffrey has made a huge amount of money via the EDGE program \nunless you say otherwise, i will shortly send you the key Getty missives in which he asserts, i believe \ncorrectly, that Trump is an archetypal narcissistic psychopath—or whatever the precise term is—and that he \nmust be opposed with full force on that basis \nmeanwhile, David has heard plenty about you Jeffrey, a financial/mathematical mind of exceptional quality \nand you should know that David is one of the very top evolutionary geneticists still breathing and my teacher \non every detail large and small \nin haste and all best \nbob"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029894.txt_4208
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029894.txt
subject: RE: Jane Doe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:31 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition will follow. Mr. Trump’s deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026298.txt_4214
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026298.txt
subject: Fwd: Our May conversation - more thoughts
messages:
  [{"sender": "Juleanna Glover", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 3 2018 03:49 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Our May conversation - more thoughts", "body": "Flagging for you. This went out to that circle of third party thinkers. Hope all is well, Jeffrey.!"}, {"sender": "Juleanna Glover", "recipients": ["Juleanna Glover"], "timestamp": "August 2, 2018 at 2:45:08 PM CDT", "subject": "Our May conversation - more thoughts", "body": "Hi all — \nI spent some time mulling additional aspects of a third choice presidential run and wanted to run five \nspecific attributes for a candidate by you as a group. \nThis much we know - the Fall elections are shaping up to be a referendum on the most divisive \nAmerican President in memory. The battle for potential Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh's \nnomination this fall will only amplify the polarity of the political debate that is already deeply \noverwrought on both sides. The rising tide of pressure on Donald Trump from the Mueller investigation \nshows no sign of ebbing. \nUnless the underlying political dynamics are disrupted, the outcomes of these unprecedented events will \nstill leave us with the same unsatisfactory two front battlefield of the 2016 Presidential election. \nWatching these unrelenting, compounding events since our discussion in May, I am guessing we are all \nasking the same question: now what? For the 48 percent of Americans who believe Donald Trump \nshould not be in the White House, perhaps we too want our own \"chaos\" candidate in 2020? \nShould Trump run again, this could be a \"break glass\" moment for the majority of Americans who don't \nsupport him. Do we want to break the genteel precedents of two parties running their ceremonious and \nseemingly illogical nominating process to select a candidate? (Why do Iowa and New Hampshire play \nsuch outsized roles? What kind of small-d democratic process relies on superdelegates?) The system \nfailed in 2016, with both parties producing terribly flawed candidates in a race to the bottom. We need to \nbuild a back-up plan in the event the system fails again. \nIt's possible, of course, that we won't need a third-party candidate. Trump could decide not to run for \nwhatever reason. The Democrats could nominate a winning 2020 candidate. I am not willing to take \nthose bets. \nThe ideal candidate for a new third party is someone who is widely perceived to be that rare combination \nof both good and great. We are looking for a proven leader of men and women, someone with clear, \ndemocratic — and moral — values that reflect the best of America, not our worst. We know people like this \non the national stage now. \nAs a thought experiment, consider the possibilities of a ticket outside the partisan lanes and imagine the \nchemistry of radical combinations: Biden/Romney? Bill Gates/Hogan? Bloomberg/Haley? Howard \nSchultz/Bob Corker? Sandberg/Kasich? \nAs we have discussed narrow path to electing the first president outside the two major party primary \nsystem in 168 years is more navigable than most think. Heading into 2020, converging trends in \nAmerican's demands for a third party (a historic high of 61%), disapproval of Donald Trump holding \nsteady above 50%, and the increasingly leftward drift of the Democratic Party suggest that electorate may \nbe susceptible to merits of a new centrist party. Cynics will say that the structural impediments of ballot \nand presidential debate access, the overwhelming advantages of legacy parties' fundraising and voter \nturn-out operations preordain failure, but they're wrong; the legal and logistical hurdles are amenable to a \ncombination of lawyering and resources. The bigger, more consequential factors come in terms of \ncandidate quality and policy. I believe a candidate with five specific characteristics including a unique — \nand purposefully non-specific - policy agenda could limbo a win. \n• This is what I think a successful third-party candidate looks like; a dream third party ticket would \nstart off with enough name ID to be an instant contender. Building the name ID to run nationally is \njust too long and expensive of a process to accomplish in the 28 months until the next presidential \nelection. We can't beat a celebrity without some celebrity of our own, whether from politics, \nsports, business, or entertainment. Instantaneous name ID is so crucial because the candidate must \nstart out in striking distance in any three-way poll against Trump and a fill-in-the-blank \nDemocratic flavor-of-the day candidate. The media and political class will predetermine \nirrelevance otherwise. \n• A Democrat-leaning candidate would have to top the ideal third-party ticket. We need someone \nwith a shot at snaking a plurality of the vote in the blue states Hillary Clinton won (227 electoral \nvotes), but moderate enough to win a plurality in some combination of Trump states like Florida, \nPennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan (another 119 votes). The right candidate may even to put \nNorth Carolina, Ohio, Indiana in play for a centrist bi-partisan ticket as well (totaling an electoral \nsweep of 464 elector votes). A right leaning candidate would meet the same fate as a primary \nchallenger to Trump — for all intents and purposes we need to assume that 36% of voters won't be \ncleaved from Trump under any circumstances and run to win around them. The deep red states \nwould be off the table entirely. \n• With the Trump reality show airing daily, voters are now expecting to take their politics with a side \nof entertainment. Heretofore, ratings will matter no matter how dry the policy topic. Surely \nStephen Colbert would gladly sacrifice his executive producer Chris Licht to produce a daily \ncomedic segment of this dream candidate interviewing Americans in truck stops and McDonald's \nacross the country. A few of the \"Saturday Night Live\" script writers could certainly be enticed to \ndisguise serious debates as informative amusement. Any candidate must be committed to a near \ndaily cadence of high quality, compelling video production. It will be especially crucial to keep \nthe voters' attention during what will be a raucous Democratic primary season. Rules governing \naccess to the general election debate stage dictate that a candidate enjoy support of at least 15% of \nvoters in the months leading up to the general election. \n• This dream candidate would pledge to serve only four years and address all of the U.S.'s ticking \ntime bombs like Social Security, Medicare, health care reform, climate change, money in politics, \ngerrymandering, and infrastructure investment in a single term. This one-and-done term decouples \nour candidate from the usual politics and gives them the power of promise and deliver decisive \naction. A four-year term pledge ensures governance independent of campaign finance concerns and \nnarrow special interests inherent to winning re-election. This \"fix-it\" ticket would promise to force \ndecisions on all the underlying structural policy matters damaging America's long-term prospects \nand distorting our democracy. No more kicking the can down the road. \n• This candidate should also pledge to push for laws passed that reflect the will of simple majorities \nin Congress. Congress now only allows bills to move forward when a \"majority of a majority\" \nsupports the policy and on many levels seems fundamentally broken. This third-party president \ncould force votes based on a transparent reading of where the votes lie via coalition building. The \nSenate filibuster power will present a high hurdle, but a third-party candidate would be a de facto \ndisruptor of the two-party system. Party discipline could well break down, and moderates in both \nparties could form a powerful, decisive block willing to work with the new President. The policies \npassed into law may not be ideal for either Democrats or Republicans, but for the major agenda \nitems that must be addressed for America's long-term health, an imperfect fix that corrects course \nis better than those that now have us hurtling toward national bankruptcy. \nAnd if no candidate secures 270 electoral votes in 2020? The House of Representatives would choose the \nnext president. In 2016, reports suggested Michael Bloomberg declined to run on a third-party ticket for \nfear of splitting support from Hillary Clinton and throwing the election to a GOP-controlled House of \nRepresentatives who would then vote to select the president. The fear was the GOP controlled House \nwould have just elected Trump. \nWould Democratic control of the House mean that the House would pick an alternative to Trump as \npresident? Each state delegation has a single vote in selecting a president and it is the incoming Congress \n- the class elected in 2020 that would decide the election. But no matter which party has the speaker's \nchair, the GOP would almost certainly have the upper hand in the majority of state delegations controlled. \nWould the state delegations pick a president based on party majority control of the delegation, the \nwinner of the popular vote in each state or their own calculations as to who is best for America? \nPrecedent suggests that delegations use secret ballots, which means individual lawmakers may vote their \nconsciences. \nIf we recruit this ideal candidate; threading the needle of name ID, a center-left bent, a TV- savvy \ncampaign team and a pledge to serve only four years with an apartisan agenda, money and campaign \nexpertise would certainly follow. And 50 state ballot access is a function of time (starting in the fall of \n2019 would be prudential) and hard work as we have discussed and many of you have exhaustively war-\ngamed. \nPart and parcel of this effort would be motivating the often politically lackadaisical middle to vote. The \nraft of new technologies in data targeting and biometric mobile voting technology could transform the \nelectorate in the next few, amping voter participation and injecting the voices of moderates (both in \npolitical views and level of political interest) into the process. And any third-party effort must \nincorporate advocacy for accelerated adaption of these all but inevitable voter verification tools. I believe \nSilicon Valley could be game-changing allies in this effort. \nI am sure none of us doubt that chaos could potentially be unleashed by jamming three viable candidates \ninto a two-party system. An election that ends up in the House of Representatives is an uncontrollable, \nmurky and ancient process. But might that be a less scary prospect than relying on the Democrats to \nnominate a candidate who can beat Trump in 2020? \nI look forward to talking more about all of our ideas on this hopeful project in coming weeks. Please feel \nfree to call me to discuss. Thank you for taking time to review this note."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025949.txt_4216
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025949.txt
subject: Re: Mechanisms for learning
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/23/2016 7:02:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time: \nno worry, if i understand correctly you are suggsting there are layers 1 through N . lets cal them L 1 - \nLn. there are times T 1- Tn / and then conjecture that changing the time . correlations ( by genetic swtch or \nother method. , you might be able to make blacks smarter by changing the time for motor layer \ndevelopment and changing the time for other layers. . ). like telemeres for the cell , are their equivalents for \nthe layers. . as you talked about culling the unused neurons in each layer, each neuron in each layer would get \ndfferent ( kill yourself if you are not being used instructions ). \nExactly. I looked up the statistics, black kids in the US have slower cognitive development (and never catch \nup), which the study of course attributed to social factors without any evidence, and they had faster motor \ndevelopment! I suspect this means their brains are slower at learning high-level concepts, because the low-level \nstructures are optimized for a shorter time. But they will keep the lead in motor development, because it is \neasier to learn, and they have more time and attention to practice once they get the structures in place. \nIt could also be that they have an additional set of learning directives in place that adapts them better to a more \nhunting/running style of life, whereas the Europeans had to adapt for identifying long-term seasonal patterns, \ndelayed gratification for agriculture etc. \nand CONCEPTS could be layer to layer communicaiton. . are gender differences also a matter of time , and \nstructure of interactions. . \nI suspect gender differences are mostly motivational, i.e. we have a reward system for all the different social \nand cognitive needs, which makes us receive different kinds of pleasure and pain, thereby pay attention and \nlearn. You cannot learn what does not attract your attention. Women tend to find abstract systems, conflicts and \nmechanisms intrinsically boring. Most women in computer science do not write programs because they enjoy \nsolving puzzles, but because they want to help people, get approval etc. There are almost no women in math, \nbecause it does not help people or yield social attention. \nMen tend to find elaborate social relations boring. If there is no pleasure in observing and empathizing with \npeople, one will not have good social cognition. \nIQ is not the only meaningful difference. Chinese pay an inordinate amount of attention to authority. I suspect \nhistorically., the authorities tended to kill them a lot if they did not. Jews tend be intellectually independent and \nanti-authoritarian, which might make them creative and inventive in ways that are hard to find in Asia. \nAt the moment, I think speed/quality of brain development plus motivational system are the key to \nunderstanding both mind and individual differences. Important part of human language might be the result in a \nmotivational need to discover/invent grammatical structure, which as a side effect makes us interested in music. \nIt would mean that Chomsky's life long hypothesis, that people have a special circuit for grammatical language, \nis wrong. They might be GENERAL learners, just like Gorillas, but with a strong motivational urge to build \n \ngrammatical structure, which the brain simply invents (there are only a few ways in which a natural language \ncan work). That is much easier to wire into a brain than a specific circuit. \ni my self believe that african music, westrn music , chinese music are a window into the the structure of those \nlayers. . western rigid, african primitve , chinese nature based, . I belive that synphoic movments best \ndescribe your layering, they open with a basic simple melody„ after it is learned, it is repeated and\" \ndeveloped\" , inverted, distorted, related, etc. the development stage take a long time. then there is a \nrecapitlaltion of the whole. and its inter and intra actions. . african musci has lots of beats. and little \ndevelopment. - no accident, it mirrors their learning process. \nInteresting question if music is somehow indicative of genetically defined prefs, but I am not sure. It could be \npath effects, starting in culture. \nre taboo \n, maybe climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation. . the earths forest fire. potentailly a \ngood thing for the species \nMaking having children expensive in terms of upbringing and missed opportunity (like in the west) is a more \nhumane way. Environmental stress while leaving near rock bottom tends to lead people to have more children, \nbecause there is no missed opportunity, and high mortality requires more attempts at procreation. Humans are a \nhardy species, outside of focused famine events and wars only small fractions of any given population die. \nI suspect that strong reductions in population will come from large-scale failure of agriculture. The climate \nchange itself with result in migration and wars, but most people will probably survive that. But who knows, I \nmight be wrong. \ntoo many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense \nis the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if \nthe brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent \nThe radical idea of treating individuals in a society as cells and the society itself as a well-organized organism is \nfascism, or course. Probably the most efficient and rationally stringent way of governance, if someone could \npull it off in a sustainable way; and if it is aggressive and expansive, its efficiency makes it a virus that \neverybody will want to stomp out. Fascism makes romantic doo-gooders like me very uncomfortable (I visited \nKZ Buchenwald five times and it had a profound influence on me; we East Germans inoculated ourselves very \nthoroughly against fascism), and the general public will not be willing to consider it. \nI rather like the treatment Fascism gets in the Amazon Series \"The Man in the High Castle\", which explores \nwhat would have happened if the Germans and Japanese had won the war: A society that tries to function as a \nbrutal and ruthlessly efficient machine, eliminating all social and evolutionary slack. It is very dark, but not a \nflat caricature of pointless evil for its own sake. Heinlein's late book \"Starship Troopers\" explores fascism, too, \nbut unlike Philipp K Dick he does not see it as a form of insanity, but as the most desirable order. \nI find your \"political incorrectness\" very fascinating. In the beginning, I thought it is a form of costly signaling, \nbut now I think you are simply entirely unconstrained in your thoughts. How did you manage in your youth? \nDid you get in trouble, or did you keep your thoughts to yourself? I wonder what kind of person you want to \ntransform into. \nIt was interesting to notice that at the Forbidden Research conference, nobody managed to say anything \nremotely out-of line. One large discussion group wanted to address the question of whether \"democracy still \n \nworks\", and mostly expressed their disagreement with Trump. Ideology is like halitosis: easy to see in others, \nhard in oneself A speaker felt that the media \"stifle all criticism of Trump\", another wanted to remove \"men \nand Elon Musk from government\", and everybody strongly agreed that we need more diversity everywhere. \nI noticed some time ago that Joi has remarkable public communication skills. He picks controversial, insight-\nladen topics, but sanitizes them by carefully replacing the parts of content that would divide his audience with \nsymbolic messages that everybody can fill with their own content in a way that resonates with them. The non-\ncontroversial parts will still be insightful. He manages to come across as very subversive, while rarely offending \nanyone (except the hard scientists, that miss hard substance). \nHe also asks influential people and smart students or faculty to write parts of his essays and speeches for him. \nThis invests them in his success, especially because he is going to reward and acknowledge them. Very few of \nhis ideas are original, instead he is good at identifying and testing thoughts he reads or hears from others. \nI am still beset by the ruinous instinct that the goal of communication ought to be mutual understanding. Joi is \nright. Public communication is about reaching one's goals. \nBests, \nJoscha"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \n\nthank you for your support and encouragement, even where I fail. \n\nSorry for being such an embarrassment today. I will spell out today's argument a bit better and cohesive when I \nget to it. Also, I should have recognized that the main point I tried to make would trigger Noam (who was as \nalways very generous, patient, kind and humble on the personal level, even though he did not feel like \nconceding anything on the conceptual one). Almost all of Noam's work focused on the idea that humans have \nvery specific circuits or modules (even when most people in his field began to have other ideas), and his \nfrustration is that it is so hard to find or explain them. \n\nI found Noam's hypothesis very compelling in the past. I still think that the idea that language is somehow a \ncultural or social invention of our species is wrong. But I think that there is a chance (we don't know that, but it \nseems to most promising hypothesis IMHO) that the difference between humans and apes is not a very \nintricate special circuit, but genetically simple developmental switches. The bootstrapping of cognition works \nlayer by layer during the first 20 years of our life. Each layer takes between a few months and a few years to \ntrain in humans. While a layer is learned, there is not much going on in the higher layers yet, and after the low \nlevel learning is finished, it does not change very much. This leads to the characteristic bursts in child \ndevelopment, that have famously been described by Piaget. \n\nThe first few layers are simple perceptual stuff, the last ones learn social structure and self-in-society. The \nswitching works with something like a genetic clock, very slowly in humans, but much more quickly in other \napes, and very fast in small mammals. As a result, human children take nine months before their brains are \nmature enough to crawl, and more than a year before they can walk. Many African populations are quite a bit \nfaster. In the US, black children outperform white children in motor development, even in very poor and \n \nsocially disadvantaged households, but they lag behind (and never catch up) in cognitive development even \nafter controlling for family income. \n\nGorillas can crawl after 2 months, and build their own nests after 2.5 years. They leave their mothers at 3-4 \nyears. Human children are pretty much useless during the first 10-12 years, but during each phase, their brains \nhave the opportunity to encounter many times as much training data as a gorilla brain. Humans are literally \nsmarter on every level, and because the abilities of the higher levels depend on those of the lower levels, they \ncan perform abstractions that mature gorillas will never learn, no matter how much we try to train them. \n\nThe second set of mechanisms is in the motivational system. Motivation tells the brain what to pay attention to, \nby giving reward and punishment. If a brain does not get much reward for solving puzzles, the individual will \nfind mathematics very boring and won't learn much of it. If a brain gets lots of rewards for discovering other \npeople's intentions, it will learn a lot of social cognition. \n\nLanguage might be the result of three things that are different in humans: \n- extended training periods per layer (after the respective layer is done, it is difficult to learn a new set of \nphonemes or the first language) \n- more layers \n- different internal rewards. Perhaps the reward for learning grammatical structure is the same that makes us \nlike music. Our brains may enjoy learning compositional regular structure, and they enjoy making themselves \nunderstood, and everything else is something the universal cortical learning figures out on its own. \n\nThis is a hypothesis that is shared by a growing number of people these days. In humans, it is reflected for \ninstance by the fact that races with faster motor development have lower IQ. (In individuals of the same group, \nslower development often indicates defects, of course.) \n\nAnother support comes from machine learning: we find that the same learning functions can learn visual and \nauditory pattern recognition, and even end-to-end-learning. Google has built automatic image recognition into \ntheir current photo app: \nhttp://blogs.wsj . com/digits/2015/07/01/go ogle-mistakenly-tags-black-p eop le-as-gorillas-showing-limits-o f-\nalgorithms/  \n\nThe state of the art in research can do better than that: it can begin to \"imagine\" things. I.e. when the \nexperimenter asks the system to \"dream\" what a certain object looks like, the system can produce a somewhat \ncompelling image, which indicates that it is indeed learning visual structure. This stuff is something nobody \ncould do a few months ago: \nhttp://www.creativeai.net/posts/Mv4WG6rdzAerZF7ch/synthesizing-preferred-inputs-via-deep-generator-\nnetworks  \n\nA machine learning program that can learn how to play an Atari game without any human supervision or hand-\ncrafted engineering (the feat that gave DeepMind 500M from Google) now just takes about 130 lines of Python \ncode. \n\nThese models do not have interesting motivational systems, and a relatively simple architecture. They currently \nseem to mimic some of the stuff that goes on in the first few layers of the cortex. They learn object features, \nvisual styles, lighting and rotation in 3d, and simple action policies. Almost everything else is missing. But \nthere is a lot of enthusiasm that the field might be on the right track, and that we can learn motor simulations \nand intuitive physics soon. (The majority of the people in Al do not work on this, however. They try to \nimprove the performance for the current benchmarks.) \n\nNoam's criticism of machine translation mostly applies to the Latent Semantic Analysis models that Google \nand others have been using for many years. These models map linguistic symbols to concepts, and relate \n \nconcepts to each other, but they do not relate the concepts to \"proper\" mental representations of what objects \nand processes look like and how they interact. Concepts are probably one of the top layers of the learning \nhierarchy, i.e. they are acquired *after* we learn to simulate a mental world, not before. Classical linguists \nignored the simulation of a mental world entirely. \n\nIt seems miraculous that purely conceptual machine translation works at all, but that is because concepts are \nshared between speakers, so the structure of the conceptual space can be inferred from the statistics of \nlanguage use. But the statistics of language use have too little information to infer what objects look like and \nhow they interact. \n\nMy own original ideas concern a few parts of the emerging understanding of what the brain does. The \n\"request-confirmation networks\" that I have introduced at a NIPS workshop in last the December are an \nattempt at modeling how the higher layers might self-organize into cognitive programs. \n\nCheers! \n\nJoscha"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031304.txt_4222
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031304.txt
subject:
  Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Steven J. Hoffenberg\nNew York Post Publishing INC.\nCEO\n\nWHAM INC THE PUBLIC COMPANY OWNS THE BELOW OPERATIONS\n\nTOWERSINVESTORS.COM\nCEO\n\nSEE\nWWwW.POST PUBLISHING.BUZZ THE JESUS CHRIST ON LINE GODs WORD NEWSPAPER\n\nMR HOFFENBERG ONLINE NEWSPAPER\nPUBLICSPEAKINGWALLSTREET.COM\n\nHOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031304"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031462.txt_4228
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031462.txt
subject: Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Apr 28, 2016, at 12:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:46:00 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "ok...\nSO SOITY..."}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We’re planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number is a, and I’m available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033405.txt_4232
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033405.txt
subject: Re: Call from New Yorker.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 11:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "?.."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 9:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "coming from you -- not mutually exclusive"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 9:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "It was latter. Why bad form. Supposed to be face to face?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "unclear if you meant you ve written notes to yourself re exit or a note you were thinking of sending - BAD FORM if latter. you both have still not agreed the rules of the game. so difficult to play . you have laid out - this is what i want. . but actually, how it would work, and what her freedoms are. could be . yours.. are essential to the plan. I think much of this is your uncertainty and not hers. sorry. and yours is infectious"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 8:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Ok. Best to make reversible errors I've written note for exit strategy 1. Not going to send for few days. Going to treat it all as a game till I maybe see her in Beijing and out of character ignore and look past her bad behavior. Best to stop obsessing."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 12:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "you can be both thoughtful and face to face"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 12:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "That is true. Interesting. I take a serious note from someone as a deed not words."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "last i looked ( sic), you do not have ovaries."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 2:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "I hear you."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 4:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "where are you?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 4:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Home Boston. Will try to call"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 10:18:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Helen fisher- anatomy of love - you might find amusing"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030335.txt_4233
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030335.txt
subject: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke P"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 5:54:21 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sent from my iPhone\nBegin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "January 30, 2015, 12:00:34 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg,\nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London.\n\nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.\nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to\nwhich he has not responded.\n\nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his\nresponse by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email.\n\nYours faithfully,\n\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian\nKings Place\n90 York Way\nLondon\n\nN1 9GU"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org"], "timestamp": "29 January 2015 at 16:49", "subject": "Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein,\n\nI write further to an email sent to you earlier this month, concerning an article we are preparing for publication\nin which you may be mentioned."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033411.txt_4237
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033411.txt
subject: Re: fun
messages:
  [{"sender": "JONATHAN FARKAS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 3:21 PM", "subject": "Re: fun", "body": "Somers and I talked to trump and Melania last night He looked and seemed very tired but upbeat"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["JONATHAN FARKAS"], "timestamp": "4/21/2019 1:22:00 PM", "subject": "Re: fun", "body": "fun"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030321.txt_4238
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030321.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, April 9, 2018 2:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you in this week?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Monday, April 9, 2018 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Today and tomorrow"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, April 9, 2018 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Monday, April 9, 2018 2:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bfast?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, April 9, 2018 8:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, time?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, April 09, 2018 4:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yds 8"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/9/2018 9:11:24 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Trump’s handpicked sdnyusa just authorized a search warrant of trump’s private lawyer’s office looking for trump\ncommunications....had to justify it with crime-fraud exception....trump has to be shitting water"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030768.txt_4242
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030768.txt
subject: Re: How are u? Send this interview to Donald Trump pls. Its going to be everywhere
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "6/21/2017 2:34:14 PM", "subject": "Re: How are u? Send this interview to Donald Trump pls. Its going to be everywhere", "body": "ok"}, {"sender": "nnn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:33 AM", "subject": "Re: How are u? Send this interview to Donald Trump pls. Its going to be everywhere", "body": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIMzSfOVwEk&sns=em"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031310.txt_4245
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031310.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 166 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT", "subject": "JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM 2!!!", "body": "CHILD RAPE BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN NEW TELL ALL JAMES PATTERSON BOOK FEDS COVER UP NO FED ARREST OF MASS CHILD RAPIST BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN\n\nSTEVEN HOFFENBERG IS TAKING BACK THE NEW YORK POST NEWSPAPER OPERATIONS"}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033377.txt_4247
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033377.txt
subject: Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jide Zeitlin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:55 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Thank you for the introduction. Do you have a better sense of what he needs? Also, what's his WhatsApp/mobile so I can confirm details for today? \nWhen's best on Friday for me to visit with you? \nBibi's speech was a bit of a dead letter on Europe."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 2, 2018, at 11:05", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "he is chairman of dubai world ports. african ports a new focus he built the palm islands. is totally trustworthy"}, {"sender": "Jide Zeitlin", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Unfortunately, bin Sulayem and I did not meet. I was stuck at the White House and he had a narrow window before heading to Cyprus. I just sent him the following note: \n\"Good Morning, I hope your travels to Cyprus were smooth. \nOkey Enelamah, Nigeria's trade minister, stopped by my home this evening as he was still in town after Buhari's visit with Trump. He mentioned his discussions with you at WEF and afterwards. Separately, I spoke earlier with the Vice President. \nWhenever we meet, I have some thoughts that may be helpful to you.\""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 3, 2018, at 3:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "No worry both problem and solution will still be there :-)"}, {"sender": "Jide Zeitlin", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Meetings here in PB are winding down. How's your day look tomorrow? \nSeparately, do you know Oleg Deripaska or Ivan Glasenberg?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 4, 2018, at 12:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Easy. Does 11 work"}, {"sender": "Jide Zeitlin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/4/2018 4:40:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Yes."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032396.txt_4252
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032396.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 18, 2016, at 5:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if trump fully supports jasta , does that make the consitutional challenge moot?"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 12:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hope Santa (swim trunks donned), reindeer and sleigh successfully made it southward. Yuletide hugs, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 25, 2016, at 12:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thx\nhope this year brings you true peace. you deserve it"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/25/2016 7:39:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "A prince art thou. Thank you.\n\nJust agreed to handle an appeal -- billion-dollar jury verdict in federal court against Johnson & Johnson. Get\nready: Representing the hip-replacement plaintiffs. Good friends on both sides.\n\nLove ya."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029499.txt_4253
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029499.txt
subject: Anonymous after Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joichi", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 11:50:05 AM", "subject": "Anonymous after Trump", "body": "Are you tracking this?\n\nhttp://mic.com/articles/138244/anonymous-just-made-good-on-its-war-against-donald-trump-in-one-massive-cyberattack?utm_source=politicymicFB&utm_medium=main&utm_campaign=social#.arje8kIP9"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030149.txt_4254
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030149.txt
subject: CONFIDENTIAL
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kate Briquelet", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 29, 2019 12:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Reporter question", "body": "Hi Marty, \nHope all is well. Noticed this Guardian story about Michael Wolff s new book, which states Donald Trump \npurchased a Palm Beach property Mr. Epstein had planned to buy, behind Mr. Epstein's back. And that Mr. \nEpstein threatened to expose Trump's shady real estate deals. Do you know anything about this? Does Mr. \nEpstein have any knowledge of illegal or suspicious dealings by President Trump? \nhttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/20 1 9/may/28/bannon-trump-organization-criminal-enterprise-\ncomments-michael-wolff-book \nAlso, we plan on running a story this Friday about the Crime Victims' Rights Act suit, and the Jane Does' \nproposed remedies. The alleged victims want the U.S. Attorney's Office to rescind the immunity provisions in \nthe NPA, and to pursue a prosecution against Mr. Epstein and his co-conspirators. Can you comment on this? \nThanks so much! \nKate"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 29, 2019 12:45 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Reporter question", "body": ""}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 29, 2019 12:48 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Reporter question", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "5/29/2019 5:19:07 PM", "subject": "CONFIDENTIAL", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028787.txt_4256
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028787.txt
subject: Re: B 727 thought
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 4:57:10 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "<T", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "you want me to call Tarek, instead? just to confirm."}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 10:21:24 A.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Call\n\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2012, at 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nthis may be a long shot to save the Boeing deal, or if you think its a dead deal, disregard this.\n\nI thought there was a connection between Tarek and myself, I do believe one concern was operation of Boeing with\nflight crew. I Know its his problem not ours, but may help make the sale happen,.\n\nI wrote this email for your review, if you think its worth sending, please critique, and let me know,. thank you:\n\nMr. Tarek El Sayed,\nI hope this email finds you well, and believe worth communicating my thoughts to you.\n\nI was surprised to hear that you decided against the purchase of our Super Boeing 727. I personally thought it was a great match\nfor your business needs in Qatar. If for any reason your decision was based on crew issues and charter needs in the Middle East,\nI'd like to share some information that might prove beneficial to making you reconsider this purchase.\n\nThe pilot candidates I have lined up for your interview along with the possibility of David Rodgers joining your flight department\nwere as follows:\n\n(at no time did I disclose location or persons to the following pilot candidates to protect your privacy.)\n\nRobert Breslin, who is the former Chief Pilot of Mr. Donald Trump, Mr. Breslin flew the Boeing 727 and Boeing 757 owned by Mr\nTrump. Mr Breslin is a fine man of 40 years of age estimate, with extensive VIP Boeing operations.\n\nJames Bartakowski, who has extensive flying experience in the Middle east, Africa and Europe régime. Mr. Bartakowski has also\nbeen involved in charter operations in Africa and Middle East and has contacted me on several recent occasions with charters for\nour Boeing 727, James has indicated there is the possibility of 40-60 hours per month charter operations for larger transport\ncategory aircraft in your area. I believe there is a growing need for charter in the business community in Qatar and neighboring\ncountries.\n\nBruce Jafahri, who is a current Boeing 727 captain who lived in Doha for two years, and familiar with international operations of\nBoeing 727 aircraft. Mr. Jafahri currently lives in California and ready for a new opportunity. Bruce is current in the Boeing 727 and\nalso flew Captain on the Boeing 747. Well qualified individual and personable.\n\nMr. El Sayed, as you have seen during our demo flight, our Boeing 727 is in impeccable condition, quite cabin and will provide\nmany years of charter and business flights your company. I believe the large business jet future in Qatar is growing and you will be\nleading its path, and your initial investment in this purchase will not come close with other aircraft options on the market as you\nmay have seen already.\n\nWe are currently completing the C2C check on the Boeing, and as we have done in the past, assure you it will be a fine aircraft\nwhen it leaves Flight Star Maintenance repair facility."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026210.txt_4257
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026210.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i got to ny today .. i hope you are having good time, as for my boss he is leaving tuesday .. i m travelling back to europe tomorrow, if not, monday for sure. lets hope that we see you next in kuwait &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017 at 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If you think wise I could come to New York sunday evening and also leave tues"}, {"sender": "<3", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i didnt understand what you mean? do you want me to stay? or you want to see my boss?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017 at 1:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why are you up so early.? youneed rest. - !, I wanted you to know that If you think I should meet your boss in New York , where there is less pomp Icandoso. / are you having fun?"}, {"sender": "<i>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i didnt get a good rest this month .. i think it is better to meet him in kuwait .. man do you love cuba that much© whenever you want .. november or before .. just send me an email and i will take care of your visit &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017 at 1:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "perfect. Ill be in paris oct 6"}, {"sender": "<i>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "enjoy it sheik jeffrey & &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017 at 1:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "get some rest. I need you healthy"}, {"sender": "es es", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/26/2017 7:28:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "women to drive in saudi .. bold move &"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026659.txt_4259
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026659.txt
subject: Fwd: Do a good deed today...
messages:
  [{"sender": "From a <>", "recipients": ["Pres. Donald Trump"], "timestamp": "January 24, 2017 at 4:17:59 PM EST", "subject": "Do a good deed today...", "body": "Here's something simple we all can do today...\n\nDiana Chapman Walsh was president of Wellesley College 8 years ago. She recently emailed her former colleagues the\nfollowing idea:\n\nListen Up! The Republicans need to get the message from the majority of Americans that we value and need the benefits\nof Obamacare. Here’s how we do that.\n\nOn January 23rd, everyone who feels that way (our numbers are legion) sends a note to Donald Trump with a simple\nmessage:\n\n“Don’t make America sick again. Improve Obamacare. Don’t repeal it.\"\n\nOne envelope for every ACA supporter in your household...even if they are under 18 years old.\nJust that simple message. Put it in an envelope, and put a stamp on it.\n\nOn January 23rd, mail it to:\n\nPres. Donald Trump\n\n1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW,\nWashington, DC 20500"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Barbro Ennbom"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 24, 2017 4:45 pm", "subject": "Fwd: Do a good deed today...", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Barbro Ehnbor S|", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/24/2017 9:56:23 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Do a good deed today...", "body": "Easy enough! :-)\n\nAttachments: Don’t make America sick again.docx\n\nImportance: — High"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030581.txt_4262
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030581.txt
subject: Fwd: <no subject>
messages:
  [{"sender": "gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance\n\nhttp://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html\n\nby Vicky Ward\n\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“T’ve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. P’ve just been. You will never\nthink the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment\nas the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another\ninvestigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested\nthem when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s\nfriendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that focused on his\nmysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited\nBrands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail\nsentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had\nsexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how\nJeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing\nfinancial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-\nchilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he?\nAnd the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, Iam so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all,\nmy 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself.\n\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. | kept running into both of\nthem, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of young women with him who stand two feet\nbehind him, as if serving a monarch. “Do they speak?” I remember asking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He\nlaughed. “Not like vou, Vicky,” was his riposte.\n\nIremembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn’t studied math\n\nsince I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at home via messenger. It was a\nbook: “Math for idiots.”"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ee"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 10:48 PM", "subject": "Fwd: <no subject>", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033230.txt_4263
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033230.txt
subject:
  PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early

messages:
  [{"sender": "Ani Anbar", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/30/2017 11:01:20 AM", "subject": "PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nInfo.\n\nBR,\nAnil"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032648.txt_4274
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032648.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski [ay", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 5:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nThx for the update,\nJust to confirm, LSJ trip is Next Sunday the 26th as you stated,,\n\nPOTUS schedule:\nArrival: Tuesday November 21\" @ 1800ish\nDeparture: Sunday November 26\" @ 1500ish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "at the moment we will go to Ish on sunday the 26th early then to new york where 1 will stay the week,\nlarry , it will be and I, trump is in town that week,"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 6:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "scheudle us to leave sunday early to lsj, we will have to go through hoops to clear ?"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski [ay", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/16/2017 11:59:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Shouldn’t be to bad if we are leaving early and Trump is not scheduled to depart until 3pm on Sunday, the\nDeparture will be similar to a DCA Departure with Customs,\n\nTSA will have an office set up inside the FBO, you will enter the main lobby at Atlantic and be escorted to the\nplane after you meet with TSA officers.,\n\nI have to schedule all passengers names 24hours in advance, no additions within 24 Hours,\n\nThx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031789.txt_4276
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031789.txt
subject: Re: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for 'junk bond king' Milken
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for 'junk bond king' Milken", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/15/trump-advisors-reportedly-seeking-a-pardon-for-junk-bond-king-milken.html  \nTrump advisors reportedly seeking a \npardon for 'junk bond king' Milken \nTae Kim \n%taws. \nSeveral of President Donald Trump's advisors are pushing him to pardon Michael Milken, \nBloomberg News reported Friday. \nMichael Milken, 71, was known as the \"junk bond king\" in the 1980s and was convicted for \nsecurities fraud. \nBloomberg said former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci, \nTreasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, senior advisor Jared Kushner and attorney Rudy  \nGiuliani support the pardon for Milken. \nMilken has a net worth of $3.7 billion, according to Forbes. The financier, who pioneered \nthe market for high-yield bonds while at Drexel Burnham Lambert, was sentenced to 10 \nyears in prison and permanently banned from the securities industry by the Securities and \nExchange Commission. His prison term was reduced to two years. \nThe White House and a spokesperson for the Milken Institute did not immediately respond \nto requests for comment. \nSee the full Bloomberg News report here."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 15, 2018, at 9:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for 'junk bond king' Milken", "body": "Did we get bank appraisal ayh"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/15/2018 1:47:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for 'junk bond king' Milken", "body": "i requested last week not yet received \ni will call again now.."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032280.txt_4285
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032280.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/15/2016 5:02:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Please find attached US Election Report."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031531.txt_4286
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031531.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2016-11-27 17:54 GMT+00:00", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will not come this week, too many trump issues. . anything new. exciting. has mr kiss come to reality?"}, {"sender": "Marc.Kensington", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/27/2016 8:44:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Too bad. I was excited to have a drink with you. Mr. Kiss is still alive and has his real market price. I have mine at 35, but to far away from both parts to have a chance to persuade both parties."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026059.txt_4292
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026059.txt
subject: Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise
messages:
  [{"sender": "EL HACHEM Johnny", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "Dear Jeff, \n\nAs previously discussed between you and Ariane, Edmond de Rothschild is deeply involved in the building and \nfinancing of the infrastructure in Europe. Edmond de Rothschild has an outstanding track record, history and \npresence in European infrastructure, as well as being one of Europe's most recognized financial advisors to \nthe infrastructure market. We have developed deep expertise in the infrastructure sector and sought secure, \nwell-managed assets, generating stable, long-term returns for investors. \n\nWe have done so by initiating and backing two experienced and highly-respected managers in the industry, \nTIIC and BRIDGE. TIIC is an equity investor in transport and social infrastructure. BRIDGE is an infrastructure \ndebt provider. Both managers are covered in more detail below. Edmond de Rothschild has been heavily \ninvolved in the launch of the below funds, providing crucial support in fund structuring, due diligence, capital \nraising, legal & compliance functions as well as the sound governance and ESG management across all funds. \n\nPartnering with TIIC and BRIDGE has enabled Edmond de Rothschild to build a strong franchise within \ninfrastructure investments, complementing its overall Private Equity offering. Edmond de Rothschild has also \nacted as anchor investor for these funds, demonstrating its strong alignment of interest with these \ninvestment teams. With Ariane we strongly believe that we should absolutely find a way to collaborate \ntogether with you to think and initiate something to serve the future needs of the US in the infrastructure \nfield. \n\nPlease find attached further information on each manager. This would also be a chance for us to explore \noppportunities of working together in the future. \n\nPlease feel free to reach out to us if you require any further information. We look forward to hearing from \nyou soon.\n\nKind regards,\nJohnny"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "8 fevr. 2017, at 12:59", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "thanks, the issue will be returns on investment. . there is a HUGE amount of cash sitting on the \nsidelines, trump will want to do private public partnerships on most things. . donald loves the \nrothschild name."}, {"sender": "EL HACHEM Johnny", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 12:01:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "I agree with your analysis. \nOn the debt side the yield will be low for sure. Nevertheless by leading the consortium and by being the Equity \nprovider of the PPP than the double digit return will be possible \n\nHappy to discuss further"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033224.txt_4307
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033224.txt
subject: | love these Trump suck up guys....
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/3/2017 3:43:10 PM", "subject": "| love these Trump suck up guys....", "body": "Do you think he gets what he wants?\n\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/02/business/dealbook/an-early-trump-backer-awaits-his-\nreward.html?_r=o\n\nInteresting piece on cognitive science/Trump. Right down your alley.\n\nhttp://www.bijaadvisorsllc.com/trumpfog.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026204.txt_4322
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026204.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "<q>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i didnt get a good rest this month .. i think it is better to meet him in kuwait .. man do you love cuba that much\n\nwhenever you want .. november or before .. just send me an email and i will take care of your visit &"}, {"sender": "<i>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i got to ny today .. i hope you are having good time, as for my boss he is leaving tuesday .. i m travelling back to europe tomorrow, if not, monday for sure. lets hope that we see you next in kuwait &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If you think wise I could come to New York sunday evening and also leave tues"}, {"sender": "<{>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i didnt understand what you mean? do you want me to stay? or you want to see my boss?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 1:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why are you up so early.? youneed rest. - !, I wanted you to know that If you think I should meet your boss in New York , where there is less pomp Icandoso. / are you having fun?"}, {"sender": "<x>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "enjoy it sheik jeffrey & &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 1:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "perfect. Ill be in paris oct 6"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 1:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "get some rest. I need you healthy"}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/24/2017 11:02:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very wellita"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029342.txt_4338
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029342.txt
subject: Fwd: Rising Star
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2013 5:55:30 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Rising Star", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Lisa Rossi <lisa.rossi@cp20.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "May 7, 2013 1:02:53 PM EDT", "subject": "Rising Star", "body": "Dear Jeffrey-\n\nWe are thrilled to announce that we are working with Congressman Hakeem Jeffries, one of the rising stars in \nthe New York Congressional delegation. Sometimes referred to as \"Brooklyn's Barack\", he is a staunch \nsupporter of President Obama and a progressive voice for the people of New York City. NY1 did a profile piece \nabout his work on the vitally important Budget and Judiciary committees in Washington. You can watch the  \nvideo here  or read the text below. \n\nHakeem is committed to electing a Democratic majority in 2014 and is encouraging his friends to participate in \nthe DCCC/DSCC fundraising dinner with President Obama this coming Monday night. Shoot us an email or \ngive us a call at (212) 531-2858 if you would like to get involved with the dinner, or would like to get an \nopportunity to get to know Hakeem better. He is an impressive guy and who will be a progressive voice in New \nYork politics for years to come. \n\nThanks, \nDarren Rigger, Lisa Rossi & Walter Swett \nDynamic SRG \n\nNY!: Hakeem Jeffries Positions Himself For Long Career In Washington \nApr 29, 2013 \nBy: Michael Scotto \nHakeem Jeffries is only about four months into his freshman year in Congress but he's already positioning \nhimself for a long career in Washington. NY 1 's Michael Scotto filed the following report."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023311.txt_4344
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023311.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:44 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "PLEASE READ CAREFULLY ,\n\nIn the spirit in which it is sent. our friendship is intact and solid , though ,it has taken a hit.\n\nMark was here this morning , the proposed transactions are extremely complex . and would take a great\ndeal of my detailed time. I do not know how, and even, if ,to move forward - . After months of hearing that\nyou would have no problem paying a large fee if you could only ascertain value. The last transaction. a\ntransaction which you saved over 600 million in tax. declared bullet proof by your attnys, and even if you\nwant to disoccount for its future realization, creating a savings of over 300 million real dollars. For some\nreason you chose to ignore our agreements , verbal written and emailed -and at the very last minute , after the\ndeal was complete decided that it was only worth 8 million dollars to you and your family. . ( assuming\nphaidon -richard happens. there isa 24m savings not including artspace and debt write down\nbenefits- certain to come later .. IMPORTANT NOTE\n\nthe phaidon transaction as currently contemplated will not work . WILL NOT !! \n\nWhen we had our meeting in your home in Bedford. You asked me for my help. I told you multiple times\nthat i thought it was a very bad idea, in that I greatly preferred to have no financial interactions. I don't have\nmany friends and didn't want money in any way to interfere with our unique relationship. Reminder, For five\nyears you had the kind, but very goofy Eileen Alexandersson as the sole manager of your massive accounting ,\nlegal, investments. reporting, trusts etc. When I first told you in no uncertain terms that I firmly believed she\nwas incompetent you admonished me for \" speaking out of both sides of my mouth\". With regard Brad\nWechsler, there has never been a \" both sides. \". I have consistantly maintained since day one that he was\nhighly unsuited for the job. When you initially asked me to help convince him to take the role , promising him\na position to manage mirage investments I sent you a note saying that instead of hiring him you should pay up\nand get first class people. I have reiterated the same message for over a year now. . Brad , not me ,was tasked\nwith hiring new people , according to his biz school org chart.(nauseating ) and as you wanted him to take\nownership of the staff,he conducted many interviews alone. . you may recall that as late as may, you told him in\nmy presence that though six months had passed he had not hired anyone. since then I have rectified errors in\nsales tax, use tax, income tax, fbar reporting, 1031 reporting, 8 million of deductions missed errors of millions"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "all the transactions just completed . including Phaidon. - I was never told that this was out of range. in\nfact, alternative methods of payment .ie my plane, or an -in-kind payment were discussed (\n\nie including keeping the 30m portion of the fee outstanding till March ) ,I provided , only because you\nspecifically requested a detailed step by step execution plan and reviewed all documents that 1 was given\naccess to. ( Phaidon was never forthcoming ) in order to make my many corrections . ( as i said more needed\non phaidon ). Iwas then told that Alans involvement warranted a discount. Even in the best of light ,\nthough it is beyond question that not one time in the three years of his retainer has he ever proposed a\nunique idea. (including any way to deal with the use issue on debras death ,or even the most basic review of\nyour largest asset by far , the BRH agreement. ) O.K. - lets say he made a contribution to the plan and stretch\nreality beyond the pale and say it was 50 %. though no one could posit such a large amount unless they were\nwearing a clown suit. , the payment and our formula of 37 percent associated with the deal was known . It\nhad both sent in writing and spoken about on the phone numerous times , a detailed execution plan was\nprovided . then and only then, after the entire transaction was laid out for the group to follow You told\n\nme that after a number of conversations with brad karp that a total of only 20m would be paid , (and even that\nwas more than you originally contemplated ) for both transactions . Leon I feel It was remarkably unfair. Did\nbrad even knew of our prior agreements.? ?, I would ask that you I and Brad karp sit together if you think it\nwould be helpful. . I would like to send him this email, with your consent of course. Ifthe transactions were\nnever consummated , i would not be owed a dime, however , the expected fee was known up front. , the\ndetailed step by step plan was followed and overseen by me, the amount that I had requested before the\ntransaction had even begun, had already been heavily discounted, out of friendship, . I believe the decision re\nonly paying 20m has frankly , left me felling quite uneasy. and colors the view about the Athene or\nRothschild transaction."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022203.txt_4346
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022203.txt
subject: Screen shot
messages:
  [{"sender": "Al seckel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/11/2010 9:01:17 PM", "subject": "Screen shot", "body": "This is a screen shot of a google search on your name taken about one minute ago, and this is BEFORE the next big sweep. I UNDERSTAND your point about \"one thing kills me,\" but the daily beast article is gone, the other ones, including the powerful Huffington Post, are about to be pushed off. And, out stuff is on top."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Al seckel"], "timestamp": "Sat, December 11, 2010 12:31:16 PM", "subject": "Screen shot", "body": "the google page is not good.. after sept when you told me you thought it would take approx twenty thousand to clean up. and hopefully in time for nov 1. then another ten thsousand, and another ten thousand. and your emails about how you are all about results „ then an emergency 2500 dollars to keep servers active , then you told me micahel didn't want to give his bank details.. your quote was he'd explode, that was after he was sent forty thousand dollars directly to his bank.. I have yet to have a complete breakdown of payments. and the results , are what they are,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032660.txt_4349
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032660.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017, at 2:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "at the moment 1 was flying to paris on the 8th. . I can leave eariler and get to paris by 830 . if you like to meet there. geneve difficult to fly out of at night. or lunch sat in paris. ,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017 5:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "can we have dinner in geneva on the 8th? i will be there on 7 and 8 dec and going back to kuwait on the 9th"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You are welcome at my house always . And more private"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Of courses"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "27?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "10pm should I bring special cake from New York"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sorry that is 2512 for the gate &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 9:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2017 8:37:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i mat the door but i will wait for my time.. i dont want to come early to find trump in your housee@©Q"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031519.txt_4356
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031519.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Oct 9, 2016, at 8:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "no, im out of it. donald brought out four women that said bill abused them. / they wilil feature in the hillary\nsays you should give the benefit of the doubt to victims. I laid this out for you over dinner, its\ndisgraceful, but. here we are"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Got it.\nNow remember\nPress is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ehud in on sun pritzker mon. you around? dinner woody sunday. or have you gone dark"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:57:02 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Times bad. R u around Tuesday?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028977.txt_4360
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028977.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/25/2016 11:12:16 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Job is to get the hard ones in without being ejected from the room. What's the one question that pierces through?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 25, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "do you want to be provacative .? trump shuttle. hawaiin tropic contests.. mortgage on mara lago. ? revenue of golf courses as income.??! , total debt of all cos .? people dont want to conribute money as he said he is worth over 10b , why should they? , calif already coming up short. . fatther bought chips in the casino to stave off bankruptcy, chips because it was better than a first lien. under the gambling rules. matt his bag man? his loan from his brother in law ( JUdges husband) how much did his father leave. his brother robert etc. otherwise you can just throw easys"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I'm interviewing him this afternoon. Anything you think I should ask?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016466.txt_4364
source_file: IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016466.txt
subject: Re: request
messages:
  [{"sender": "Susan Edelman [sedelman@nypost.com]", "recipients": ["Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, December 5, 2018 3:06 PM", "subject": "Re: request", "body": "Right, but the law allows for the redaction of victim names. Where does it say the whole document is denied?"}, {"sender": "Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>", "recipients": ["Sue"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re: request", "body": "Hi Sue — the document was filed under seal. I cannot violate the seal and provide it to you.\n\n(off the record please) You may wish to petition the court, or have the Post’s lawyer send our lawyers something. We've reached the end of me being able to help — it’s sealed."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033218.txt_4365
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033218.txt
subject: President PBI FYI
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/1/2017 1:24:27 AM", "subject": "President PBI FYI", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nTrump in PBI Fed 3rd thru 5th,. FYI,\n\nWhen PresTrump is visiting MarLago PBI there will be flight restrictions flying in and out of palm beach,, due to location of MarLago,,.\n\nThere will be Gate Way airports you have to depart from in order to land PBI,,\n\nTeterboro is a gateway departure airport, requires 24 hour notice just like our DCA program,\n\nWhen Trump is in MarLago, we will be unable to land in Palm Bch departing from LSJ,, we can land Fort Lauderdale Excutive airport, which isn't bad, they are offering $2.76 fuel price this weekend,,\n\nSame with departure from PBI, need 24 hour notice when President is in town,,\n\nSee message from PBI Port:\n\nImportant Message: All Palm Beach County Airport Users\n\nWe are getting word and expecting a President of the United States (POTUS) visit to PBI / Mar-a-Lago from Feb 3, 2017 (afternoon?) until Feb. 5, 2017. Times to be established.\n\nExpect the FAA’s Temporary Flight Restriction paperwork to be posted at least 72 hours prior to the POTUS arrival.\n\nThe following two airports are in the inner core, inside 1ONM TFR.\n\nPBI Airport; All General Aviation traffic into PBI must clear TSA designated “Gateways” for both arrival and departures into and out of PBI. Departure Gateways - We expect the Gateways to be established at the multiple locations at PBI with TSA operating from 0800-1700 and requires prior reservation (24hrs) with TSA. Arrival Gateways — Expect Ft. Lauderdale International Airport (FLL) and Orlando Int’] (MCO). Also expecting Teterboro, Dulles, and White Plains as additional gateways.\n\nLNA Airport; As initially established by the USSS, the Palm Beach County Park Airport (LNA) in Lantana, FL will be closed to all departures and flight training. Only arrivals into LNA that have gone through the TSA Gateway program at one of the designated airports (FLL/MCO) may fly into LNA during the TFR.\n\nThe 30NM outer core will also be in effect and measures will be posted in the FAA NOTAM/TFER release. Please share this advisory with all aviation users.\n\nRegards,\n\nPeter E. Labbe, Director\n\nOperations & Security\n\nDepartment of Airports\nPalm Beach International Airport"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032355.txt_4382
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032355.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\n\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You called it! How are you positioned re market?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "long dow , short yen euro and pound. long reits,"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "who is treasury secretary? Is Mnuchin a done deal? Seems too obvious."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas, Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:19:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "212 556 3821"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031294.txt_4383
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031294.txt
subject: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "November 16, 2017 at 3:38 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Jeffrey — \n\nSounds good. Thanks so much for confirming. If you or someone in your office could provide the information below, I \ncan send along an invoice and contribution letter for your $10K donation toward the chairs. \n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable): \nCONTACT NAME: \nADDRESS LINE 1: \nADDRESS LINE 2: \n\nMany thanks.\n\nBest,\nSteven"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "November 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "November 17, 2017 at 11:38 AM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Dear Richard, \n\nThanks so much for providing this information. I'm offsite today at \nthe ceremony venue, but I will be sure to send everything over to \nyou via email on Monday. \n\nBest regards, \nSteven"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer"], "timestamp": "November 17, 2017 at 11:19 AM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "The foundation that will be making this contribution is: \nGratitude America Ltd. \n6100 Red Hook Quarter, B3 \nSt Thomas, USVI 00802 \n\nplease send all correspondence including invoice to me via email \n\nthank you"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer"], "timestamp": "November 20, 2017 at 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "please send info tomorrow as i will be out the remainder of the week \n\nthank you"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "November 20, 2017 at 8:48:00 PM EST", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Richard - \n\nI certainly will. But perhaps you can clarify something for me before I put all this together for the donation. \n\nJeffrey Epstein had asked to submit the letter and invoice to Peggy Siegal instead, and she had supplied \ndifferent information than below. \n\nPlease advice how best to proceed. \n\nBest, \nSteven"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "11/21/2017 1:29:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "is gratitude paying for IFP or peggy? \n\nplease advise \n\nthank you"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032525.txt_4384
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032525.txt
subject: SIT Customs
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "4/16/2017 3:57:41 PM", "subject": "SIT Customs", "body": "Due to Staffing issues, customs cannot use North Ramp, only PreClear in main building.\n\nTrump is suppose to depart 4pm, Latest 4:30pm\nFlight time: 2+25min\n\nDo you want PBI customs or PreClear STT?\n\nThx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032243.txt_4385
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032243.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Tom Barrack Privat", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/9/2016 5:28:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hope ur good. Let's catch up"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 9, 2016, at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hope you are well, photos look good. fyi I receive many calls a week about both Donald ( celina midelfart, \nmarla , beauty contest. mara lago etc) and clinton from reporters. less so recently with clinton , but my \nanswers are always i have nothing to say. or i try to ignore altogether. A few times i have been ambushed on \nthe street with questions . but am more careful now"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032433.txt_4386
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032433.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 11, 2017 11:52 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "if not florida do you have any plans to be in new york next week."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:45 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Going to florida...then end of the week nyc"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 12, 2017 10:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thursday new york? my brithday fri"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 3:19:45 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Craziest shit happening...trying to deliver el chapo to barack instead of trump....figuring out my schedule next week...will let you know"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032853.txt_4392
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032853.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wo!"], "timestamp": "2/19/2016 5:46:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Im here today, ehud barak at 1 , would you like to join at 2?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "NYT called me about you and Trump. Also, Hillary campaign digging deeply. Again, you should consider preempting."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031992.txt_4394
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031992.txt
subject: hello from ibiza
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:38 PM", "subject": "hello from ibiza", "body": "what is your schedule?"}, {"sender": "Daniel Siad", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 2:28 PM", "subject": "Re: hello from ibiza", "body": "Can you call me\nI am with tigrane he would like to meet you he is here with me in Ibiza\nwith 8 top girls he said he would like to build some thing with you\ncan you come to Ibiza we have a huge house or how can we orgnise this\nmeeting even Jean Luc could doo a great biz also\nhe has the most amizing top models on stand by I told him not to do any\ndeals with anybody before he meet with you .\nhe stoped working with IMG and Trump wi here please call me and let me\nknow what is your plans\n\nwarmest regards\nDaniel"}, {"sender": "Daniel Siad", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat Jul 24 2010 at 9:32 AM", "subject": "Re: hello from ibiza", "body": "the other girl name is"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "7/24/10", "subject": "Re: hello from ibiza", "body": "i will be in paris tom000rw night"}, {"sender": "Daniel Siad", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "7/24/2010 5:10:54 PM", "subject": "hello from ibiza", "body": "can you come to Ibiza or you can send us the ticket to come with\nTigrane and five girls to Paris because they have there return ticket\nfrom Barcelona if they are living from here\nit will be great if you can arrenge for us tickets for Paris\nplease let me know so we can get orgnized"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031986.txt_4396
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031986.txt
subject: Re: You should see this movie/documentary
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/6/2011 9:35:06 PM", "subject": "Re: You should see this movie/documentary", "body": "seems very one-sided and as if the makers didn't quite see the bigger picture \ni'm not sure the finance industry really had too much of a choice"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 6, 2011 5:27 am", "subject": "Re: You should see this movie/documentary", "body": "it is very unfair, and misrepresents tons of inf"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033581.txt_4397
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033581.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas EE", "recipients": ["jeffrey <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi jeffrey hope all is well | think you are going to have a windertul life from now on in your opinion how much is left in\nthis market it's been a trump triumph | gave him some money through woody best jonathan"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 12:25:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty left"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yikes your birthday coming up next month"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 12:30:19 P.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "oy"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 5:31:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "well heaven can wait"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033149.txt_4403
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033149.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/31/2019 9:33:59 AM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/27/us/politics/trump-school-grades.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026924.txt_4407
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026924.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["Danny Goldberg", "Kevin Bright", "Caryl Ratner"], "timestamp": "12/20/2018 8:09:23 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032341.txt_4410
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032341.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 9:57:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You called it! How are you positioned re market?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032531.txt_4412
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032531.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:26:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a 2 timer?"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:19:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "careful she is not trustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I am seeing Ma little bit I don't think it will turn into romance I am a bit old and not tall enough but she seems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship Commison it came through Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017581.txt_4421
source_file: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017581.txt
subject: Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)
messages:
  [{"sender": "Auren Hoffman <§>", "recipients": ["<ai>"], "timestamp": "Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:05:58 -0800", "subject": "Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "Dear Fouad,\nDear Lisa —\nYou are invited to join us at Dialog 2014 -- a two-day bipartisan retreat discussing how to change the world.\n\nThere will be no speeches ... just many moderated break-out discussions of 6-15 people on various topics. And\nwe design the agenda around your ideas and needs.\n\nPlease let us know if you would like to join us,\n\n/- Peter Thiel and Auren Hoffman/\n\np.s. and yes, we know Dialog 2014 is 16 months away, but we are giving you a chance to sign up now\n*DETAILS*:\n\nYou’re invited to join us at the Dialog Retreat ... 150 people to change the world ... a participatory and\nentrepreneurial conversation on changing the world.\n\nThe *Dialog//*participants aren’t modest. We want to change the world.\n\nBut we don’t want to spend our time being in a large audience listening to winded speeches. There are no\nspeakers. No panels. All attendees participate in break-out facilitated discussions. And we *limit the discussion"}, {"sender": "Lisa Randall", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:17 AM", "subject": "Re: Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "Is this worthwhile?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa Randa] | aes"], "timestamp": "Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:28:51 -0500", "subject": "Re: Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "sundance is nice ,, go"}, {"sender": "es", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2012 5:28:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "So let me understand. You are suggesting tourism?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028778.txt_4422
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028778.txt
subject: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade
messages:
  [{"sender": "Vinoda Basnayake", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "States must get in front of this negative trend before spreads across Africa and it is too late. The U.S. should\ncall for President Sall to honor the request of the UN Working Group and release his political rival Mr. Wade\nand also keep his pledge of a 5 year presidential mandate. President Obama has said that Africa is more\nimportant than ever to security and prosperity in the U.S. We have worked very hard in implementing and\nprioritizing democracy and democratic succession in Africa. The Obama administration must not let our hard\nwork be compromised in Senegal, we have worked too hard and come too far."}, {"sender": "elisabeth feliho", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake", "Bob Crowe"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, February 23, 2016 5:20 AM", "subject": "Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Dear Vinoda and Bob,\n\nPlease see attached the last version of the revised draft letter. We have made some modifications and amendments\nwe submit to your proposal. You can finalize the letter as it suits you. We strongly recommend to wait Wednesday\nor Tuesday this week before sending the letter as Amnesty International will issue on Wednesday 24\" February\nits worldwide report on human right situation. It is highly probable that major statement will be made on Mr.\nWade case in the report on Senegal, which will give us more input for the letter.\n\nMany thanks and best regards.\n\nEF"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028921.txt_4424
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028921.txt
subject: truly outrageous S.i am so sorry for you & alan-
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lilly Ann Sanchez", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 2 2015 11:14 PM", "subject": "truly outrageous S.i am so sorry for you & alan-", "body": "Jeffrey - \nPlease let me know if I can help in any way-\nStory below-"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032369.txt_4425
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032369.txt
subject: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 2:51:53 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bigger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.0 (as some are suggesting). I am just not sure who that person would be. The Trump trade certainly seems to have legs -- all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for making so much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032519.txt_4428
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032519.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 22, 2017, at 5:41 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/03/21/trump-signs-nasa-bill-aimed-at-landing-on-mars/?utm term=.64eb9bf54e09"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/22/2017 11:46:50 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "All shoe. This is not supporting science. It is all about the size of the rocket for him. All this will do is give him glory and not contribute to science."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031106.txt_4434
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031106.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "COLOM, Olivier", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, October 18, 2013 04:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "COLOM, Olivier", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, October 18, 2013 06:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have to do some stuff, like more \"political\", but might go to Ethiopia instead of NY early November"}, {"sender": "COLOM, Olivier", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, October 18, 2013 10:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have you got an idea for me? :)\n\nWe had fun with Ariane this week. She talked everyday about you and the advice you gave her last Sunday by the way.\nAnd her mum likes you as well"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["COLOM, Olivier"], "timestamp": "Saturday, October 19, 2013 12:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you know Leah Pisar?\n\nno, I assume she she clever not cute"}, {"sender": "COLOM, Olivier", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "10/19/2013 11:21:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "How come you're always right?\n\nShe is not awful looking though. Her father is Samuel and she worked with the spokesman of Clinton at the White\nHouse. She lives in Paris now. 40ish.\nShe teaches at University and also works at Huffington Post. Very much in the middle of US - France relations.\n\nFound out that Castelbajac has his showroom next door to my new apartment. Have already seen some models come\nand go - to your liking | think"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019873.txt_4441
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019873.txt
subject: Fwd: Fire and Fury - Michael Wolff.pdf
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Willis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:31 AM", "subject": "Fire and Fury - Michael Wolff.pdf", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 2:27 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fire and Fury - Michael Wolff.pdf", "body": "girls, a very nice book about trump. just published. we are the first ones to read! i mean they do not sell it yet."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033175.txt_4443
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033175.txt
subject: US Election Update
messages:
  [{"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/13/2016 1:39:13 PM", "subject": "US Election Update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\nSince the start of 2nd US Presidential Election debate till now, we have processed 3.1 million tweets.\nHere is the performance of candidates:\n1. Donald Trump 11.80% (Positive), 15.66% (Neutral), 72.54% (Negative)\n2. Hillary Clinton 40.70% (Positive), 19.09% (Neutral), 40.21% (Negative)\nWinning Chances:\n1. Clinton 72%\n2. Trump 28%\nWinning chances in US States:\n1. Clinton: New York (84%), California (75%), North Carolina (64%), Florida (75%), Washington (52%), Ohio\n(96%), New Jersey (70%)\n2. Trump: Texas (66%)\nRegards,\nZubair Khan"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031112.txt_4446
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031112.txt
subject: Fwd: Steve Bannon’s clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms
messages:
  [{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayern", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2018 10:54:16 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Steve Bannon’s clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms", "body": "Sent from my iPhone\n\nBegin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Fareed Zakaria GPS", "recipients": ["Fareed Zakaria GPS"], "timestamp": "June 2, 2018 at 2:26:50 AM GMT+4", "subject": "Steve Bannon’s clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms", "body": "Please scroll down or click here to read my latest Washington Post column.\n\nSteve Bannon’s clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms\nBy Fareed Zakaria, Friday, June 1, 2018\n\nROME -- The Republican Party faces dim prospects in the midterm elections. But it doesn’t have to be that way, says\nStephen K. Bannon, the chief ideologist of the populist wave that brought Donald Trump into the White House. “If the\nRepublicans continue on the path they are on,” Bannon told me Thursday, “they will lose 40 seats in the House and\nPresident Trump will be impeached.” He presented an alternative that strikes me as clever, and it’s a strategy that\nTrump himself seems to instinctively get.\n\nBannon was in Rome to learn from and provide support to the unusual coalition of populists and nationalists who\ntogether won half the vote in Italy’s recent elections and are now set to govern. Bannon sees that sort of coalition —\nmixing left and right, old and young — as his goal for the United States. “Europe is about a year ahead of the United\nStates. ... You see populist-nationalist movements with reform [here]. ... You could begin to see the elements of\nBernie Sanders coupled with the Trump movement that really becomes a dominant political force in American politics.”\n(This column draws on an on-air interview he did with me for CNN, as well as a subsequent conversation.)\n\nThe Republican Party’s strategy, for now, appears to be to make the midterm elections a series of local contests focusing\non the tax cut and the healthy economy. Bannon views this as fundamentally misguided. “You have to nationalize the\nelection,” he said. Bannon understands that voters are moved from the gut more than through a wonky analysis of\ntaxes. “This is going to be an emotional [election] — you’re either with [House Minority leader] Nancy Pelosi or you’re\nwith Donald Trump. ... Trump’s second presidential race will be on Nov. 6 of this year.”\n\nBannon is most focused on the issue of immigration because it hits both the heart and the head. “Immigration is about\nnot just sovereignty, it’s about jobs.” He believes that the Trump coalition can attract up to a third of Sanders supporters\nwho see trade and immigration as having created unfair competition for jobs, particularly for working-class blacks and\nHispanics. He advocates appealing directly to those voters, saying, “You’re not going to be able to take the Hispanic and\nblack community from the STEM system in grammar school to our best engineering schools . . . to the great jobs in\nSilicon Valley, unless you start to limit these H-1B visas and this unfair competition . . . from East Asia and South Asia.”\n\nNow this strikes me as entirely wrong. The reason that not enough Hispanic and black students end up in Silicon Valley\nhas much more to do with a broken education system, particularly for poorer kids, than the modest number of skilled\nAsian immigrants who get work visas. The most likely result of limiting these visas is that talented immigrants will simply\ngo elsewhere — Canada, Britain, Australia — and start successful companies there. And, in fact, there is lots of evidence\nthis is already happening."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030123.txt_4452
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030123.txt
subject:
  Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 2:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "eric?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 12:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "You are on the move. I went out for some retail therapy."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "date certain? hamlet. ?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Mid-October, but there will be another run at him to reconsider."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "so is he the alternate in essence"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "It appears that way. I have advised that him staying through the end is the clearly preferable alternative."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "whose name is the apt in, does it have to be this one? or would another be ok."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 6:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "I signed the lease in my name for a year, so I think Iam pretty stuck. It is $11,000 a month and Latham reimburses me $8000 a month."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "furnished or un?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Furnished"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "see you at 1030? tomor?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "I won't get back to the city until @ 11:30, unfortunately."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "ok 1?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/21/2014 2:54:20 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Yep. Will be there."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021761.txt_4460
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021761.txt
subject:
  Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable

messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Reiter/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Margie"], "timestamp": "07/10/2008 02:36PM", "subject": "Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": "Margie,\n\n\" As you know, nothing too big or too small for us, especially in the summer\" Hmmmmm. I have to be\ndirect -- you or someone at your paper was very astute in checking the Clerk and Comptroller's computer\nand activity in the Epstein case two days before the hearing. As result, you sent me a text message on\nSaturday asking what the activity was about and I confirmed that the plea would take place. You were\nthe only member of the news media that I talked with. And yet, after the case is completely over, the\nPalm Beach Daily News' editorial staff remains silent on the topic.\n\nThanks,\nMike"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:58 AM", "subject": "Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "2/26/2010 2:59:54 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033344.txt_4467
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033344.txt
subject: POTUS
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2019 1:50:32 AM", "subject": "POTUS", "body": "Appears President Trump B757 is in Islip, we are parked right in front of it,\nit came here on Tuesday and is due to depart wednesday this week"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033422.txt_4469
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033422.txt
subject: NY
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/14/2018 2:59:21 PM", "subject": "NY", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nDo you think NY on Monday is still possible?\n\nI guess It makes sense to leave the G550 in PBI until Wednesday then fly it to Boca, Since Trump arrival\nis Friday.,\n\nShould I leave plane in PBI until Wednesday?\n\nThx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031825.txt_4471
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031825.txt
subject:
  From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims

messages:
  [{"sender": "DAVID SCHOEN", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/15/2019 12:21:00 AM", "subject": "From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims", "body": "I know it was an old piece but Fox is running it again today. \nThe numerous young women who say they were sexually abused by \nwealthy, Clinton-linked financier Jeffrey Epstein no longer appear set to \ntestify after a last-minute settlement was reached in a closely-watched civil \nlawsuit against the registered sex offender. \nhttps://www.foxnews.com/us/jeffrey-epstein-a-registered-sex-offender-settles-\ncivil-lawsuit-and-avoids-testimony-from-alleged-victims"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023041.txt_4472
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023041.txt
subject: Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmaxl@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": "Annette Witheridge", "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers are\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\n1. [redacted allegation]\n2. [redacted allegation]\n3. [redacted allegation]\n4. [redacted allegation]\n5. [redacted allegation]\n6. [redacted allegation]\n7. [redacted allegation]\n8. [redacted allegation]\n9. [redacted allegation]\n10. [redacted allegation]\n11. [redacted allegation]\n12. [redacted allegation]\n13. [redacted allegation]\n14. [redacted allegation]"}, {"sender": "GMAX <gmaxl@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 08:37:01 -0800", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 05:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023259.txt_4474
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023259.txt
subject: moving forward
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:03 PM", "subject": "moving forward", "body": "I have mixed emotions about what transpired today. really, You saw first hand in nauseating detail what i have been saying to you for quite a while now. —_Joslins answers were totally incomprehensible."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:45 PM", "subject": "moving forward", "body": "okay, its time for you to decide how you would like to move forward. ( fyi get your money from the 1031 . the screw up is only one of many,) If you decide to move foward on decanting. phaidon, note basis estate update , each requires many carefully orchestrated detailed steps. and precision . there are hundreds of millions in saving if done correctly and a huge mess if not. Ifyou want me and my colleagues to do it , oversee it paper it and guide it, you should tell me. It is a big undertaking . If not , ok .. Brad and your crew can do it. I will have no real further involvement apart from confirming the outcome of my proposed structure, I will not risk the admonition of- they thought you said, they thought you meant, they understood it to be. but they said you said, (ie ,l asked at our meeting that accounting be done properly for bens house , what came back was ada thought that I meant that we needed to go back to the 97 trust and give him a full third party accounting of where his money had gone??!! I kid you not). I dont think brad should talk to jane heller without a fully fleshed out plan in place and even then it should be you."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:21 AM", "subject": "agenda", "body": "1 fees, amount and to what entities when and responsiblitis. 2. gagosian idea to save a minimum of 10 mill and maybe more. 3. ican walk you through carlyns screw up, 50 % would have made little difference and maybe made it worse . 4. we should have an all hands meeting with your family to talk about art distribution on death. . 5. phaidon, decantings ( already firmly in progress ) loans. (alan ) pent. ( with follow up ) all part of same elegant transaction, 6 asymetric risk worth at least 50- 60 no matter how you calculate. I can explain. 7 lets get the money issue out of the way once and for all. I have my team set to start."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella <3 ii >"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:07 AM", "subject": "Fwd: moving forward", "body": "I had forgotten that Alan was actually at the table when i explained my note deal to you. _—it was at the end of the meeting described below. . as you will recall , not once , not even a peep did alan suggest contemporaneously his hand in the crafting, in fact brad said it was an idea. that HE brad, HAD HAD , from the begiining . my emails between alan and I that you can read , further confirm authorship. Im sure you recall the obnoxious tooting when alan said he agreed with my plan. ."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030983.txt_4480
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030983.txt
subject: Fwd: Alex Acosta update I Power Line
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/6/2018 10:17:57 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Alex Acosta update I Power Line", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Robert Grusky", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "December 6, 2018 at 3:52:15 PM EST", "subject": "Alex Acosta update I Power Line", "body": "https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/12/alex-acosta-update.php  \nAlex Acosta update \nEarlier this week, pedophile Jeffrey Epstein bought his way out of a lawsuit that would have \ngiven some of his victims the opportunity to testify about his predatory and criminal \nconduct. Victims never got that opportunity when Epstein faced criminal charges, because \nAlex Acosta___then the lead prosecutor, now the Secretary of Labor___let Epstein off with \na ridiculously lenient sentence. Despite having committed hideous sex offenses with dozens \nof minors, Epstein received a sentence of 13 months in jail, during which he was often free \nduring the day. \nEpstein's decision to buy his out of the civil lawsuit, one that he had the nerve to initiate, \nbenefits Acosta. The trial would have provided non-stop headlines, coupled with frequent \nreferences to the sweetheart deal Acosta gave him. As Randy Schultz puts it, the trial would \nhave been the occasion for a long overdue public shaming of Acosta. Now, he avoids this \nconsequence. \nBut this doesn't mean Acosta is out of the woods. He faces calls for his ouster from the \nTrump cabinet. \nSome calls are from the usual suspects. Michelle Goldberg of the New York Times has \nwritten a piece so obnoxious that it almost makes me want to see Acosta ride out the storm. \nBut some conservatives are also advocating Acosta's departure. Concerned Women for \nAmerica is a stalwart conservative organization. It describes itself, accurately, as \"focus[ed] \non seven core issues: the family, the sanctity of human life, religious liberty, education, \nsexual exploitation, national sovereignty, and support for Israel.\" (Emphasis added) \nIts leader, Penny Nance, has called for Acosta's resignation. Noting that labor trafficking, \nwhich the Labor Department combats, is often conjoined with sex trafficking, Nance says \nthat President Trump would not have nominated Acosta if reports fully describing Acosta's \nconduct in the Epstein case had emerged earlier. \nSen. Ben Sasse has also weighed in. He sent a letter to the Justice Department asking it to \ninvestigate its treatment of Epstein, including the fact that the plea deal ensured that victims \nof the pervert would be denied the ability to comment on or object to the leniency of his \nsentence. Sasse is chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Oversight, \nAgency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts. \nSen. Marco Rubio, a longtime supporter of Acosta, says it would be \"very troubling\" if \npolitical influence led to a light sentence for Epstein. In Rubio's view, and that of every \nrational person, Epstein \"should have been in jail for a long time.\" Rubio added, however, \nthat he will reserve judgment until he hears Acosta's side. \nThat's fair. But so far, Acosta has provided no real defense for letting Epstein off so lightly. \nIn public, at least, he is standing by his argument that the deal was a reasonable one and that \nthis is old news. \nPreviously, Acosta had a different defense. He cited \"a year-long assault on the prosecution \nand the prosecutors\" by \"an army of legal superstars\" who represented Epstein. This \nallegedly included \"defense counsel investigat[ing] individual prosecutors and their families, \nlooking for personal peccadilloes that may provide a basis for disqualification.\" In this \naccount, the deal was made to relieve the pressure, while still getting a conviction. \nAcosta could hardly assert this explanation____i.e., that he wimped out___while seeking a \ncabinet position with the expectation of being appointed to more exalted jobs in the future. \nNor is the explanation particularly plausible. Acosta isn't the first prosecutor to face a \nscorched earth defense. Ask Ken Starr about this. \nI don't doubt that Acosta regarded escaping the wrath of the defense team as a benefit of \nreaching the plea deal. But I don't believe this was incentive enough to cause him, in effect, \nto throw the case. \nWhat was the true incentive? As I wrote when this story broke, I think it was the same \nincentive that explains much of his conduct in public life___Acosta's desire to accommodate \npeople he thinks can help him down the road. \nWhich people? Probably the lawyers at Kirkland and Ellis, where Acosta had once worked. \nEpstein enlisted Ken Starr* and Jay Lefkowitz, both of Kirkland, for his defense team. \nAcosta reportedly worked out the terms of his surrender with Lefkowitz, a former colleague, \nat a meeting in a location far away from the prosecutor's office. \nThe location of the meeting is itself suspicious. Prosecutors and other law enforcement \nofficials normally demand that those seeking a deal come to them. \nThe fact that Acosta didn't is another sign___if one were needed___that this was a \ncapitulation. It also casts further doubt on the claim that Acosta was capitulating for the \npurpose of sparing the folks who worked with him in the prosecutor's office. \nThe key point, though, is that Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz were power players in \nWashington___men who might help Acosta down the road. \nReaders will be quite familiar with Starr's background. Lefkowitz was director of cabinet \naffairs and deputy executive secretary to the domestic policy council under President George \nH.W. Bush. Under President George W. Bush, Lefkowitz served as general counsel in the \nOffice of Management and Budget and later as deputy director of domestic policy at the \nWhite House. \nAccommodating such influential figures must have seemed like a good career move. Having \nStarr and Lefkowitz on his side might help Acosta get a judgeship, a cabinet appointment, or \na high-paying job back at Kirkland and Ellis. \nI'm speculating, of course. But my speculation finds support in Acosta's practice of \naccommodating the powerful. \nMuch of that accommodation is of Democrats. Indeed, at the time Acosta was working in \nMiami as a U.S. Attorney, he had alienated some Republicans by such accommodation  \nwhile at the Department of Justice. Some say he was on the verge of being fired when \nAttorney General Alberto Gonzalez parachuted him to Miami. The Epstein settlement was a \nway for Acosta to shore up his standing with some influential Republicans. \nWill Acosta be able to survive the current scandal? I don't have a clear sense about this yet. \nBut President Trump, who isn't bashful about sacking cabinet members, may come to \nbelieve (if he doesn't now) that it's disadvantageous to have a cabinet member who sold out \nteenage victims of sexual abuse, especially when the sell-out benefited an ultra-wealthy \nserial offender. \n* Some on the left are trying to make something or the fact that Starr, who had investigated \nBill Clinton in connection with sexual misconduct, later defended Epstein, a pervert. This is \nsilly. \nIn both instances, Starr was doing his job as a lawyer. Perverts are entitled to a defense and \nthere is nothing hypocritical about investigating Bill Clinton's misconduct when that was \nStarr's job and later joining the team that was defending Jeffrey Epstein. \nAcosta, by contrast, was on the team seeking justice for Epstein and for his victims. He gave \nup this quest for reasons that can't be defended."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031445.txt_4481
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031445.txt
subject: Re: Today...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/29/2015 4:22:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "Ok. Talk at 5:00."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, March 29, 2015", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "ok, i need to run by lawyers, your sentene appears to read i nevefr met clinton or gore?? harsh about women, i thought we modified that."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "In NYC or otherwise? Why don't we plan on talking then at about 5:00."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "be back on land around 4"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 10:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "Have you read? When's good to talk?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030997.txt_4484
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030997.txt
subject: Re: Fw: (no subject)
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/29/2009 3:04:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: (no subject)", "body": "call back"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031451.txt_4487
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031451.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump.\n\nBecause of this.\n\n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is\neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it --\nJeffrey enjoys his social life.\"\n\nThat story will never die."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 9:50:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032728.txt_4498
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032728.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jonathan ‘areca", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/2/2018 10:58:", "subject": null, "body": "Hi Jeffrey do you think this is Smoot Hawley 2 which topped us into the depression Bloomberg just quoted\ntrump trade wars are good and easy to win thanks jf Somers is going to mar a lago lunch Saturday fund\nraiser for djt"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031099.txt_4499
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031099.txt
subject: Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rush, George", "recipients": ["Howard Rubenstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 08", "subject": "Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Howard:\n\nWe’re working on a story for our Sunday column about Jeffrey Epstein. I thought I might send\nmy questions to you tonight, so you’d have them first thing tomorrow."}, {"sender": "Howard Rubenstein", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "October 9, 2009 7:26:54 AM PDT", "subject": "FW: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Darren:\n\nI hope you are well.\n\nSince we are no longer working for Jeffrey, I’m forwarding this Daily News request to you so you can handle it as you see\nfit.\n\nMany thanks,\n\nHoward"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael J. Pike"], "timestamp": "10/9/2009 5:24:34 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026893.txt_4513
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026893.txt
subject: Fwd: The Unsteady Undertow Commands the Seas (Temporarily)
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/15/2018 6:56:57 PM", "subject": "Fwd: The Unsteady Undertow Commands the Seas (Temporarily)", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Judie Taylor", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 15, 2018 at 2:36:30 PM EDT", "subject": "The Unsteady Undertow Commands the Seas (Temporarily)", "body": "Sunday Night Insight\nOctober 14, 2018\nThe Unsteady Undertow Commands the Seas (Temporarily)\nSharmin Mossavar-Rahmani\nBrett Nelson\nMaziar Minovi\nAndrew Dubinsky\nMichael Murdoch\nMary Rich\nChief Investment Officer\nHead of Tactical Asset Allocation\nManaging Director\nVice President\nVice President\nVice President\nThe 7.8% intraday peak-to-trough decline in US equities between September 21st and October 11th has rattled investor confidence. Numerous headlines of stock market \"carnage\" have further eroded their confidence. As a result, some of our clients have asked whether this drop signifies the beginning of the end of a nearly 10-year bull market.\nWe do not think so. So far, this pullback is actually smaller than the two prior downdrafts we experienced in late January and in mid-March, neither of which derailed the US economy nor the bull market. The steady factors we highlighted in our annual Outlook—such as economic growth, benign inflation, robust earnings, and low probability of recession—have not dissipated. Furthermore, while the investor focus has shifted to the risks around the unsteady undertow, most of these factors are, on balance, less concerning today than they were at the beginning of 2018.\nOf course, that is not the case across all geopolitical concerns. While trade tensions with Mexico and Canada have abated, those with China have certainly deteriorated and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. But, in aggregate, there has been more improvement than deterioration, in our view.\nIn this Sunday Night Insight, we will provide a brief update on the steady factors and unsteady undertow. We then conclude with our view that the steady factors will likely continue to win this tug-of-war between the two.\nSteady Factors\nWhile the headlines warn of equity market carnage, the facts do not support such alarming headlines. The S&P 500 is still up 5.1% on a year-to-date total return basis and financial conditions remain at easier levels today than they did when the Federal Reserve began this tightening cycle in 2015, despite the recent decline in equities and 0.76 percentage point increase in 10-year Treasury yields year-to-date. Most importantly, as highlighted by Federal Reserve Chairman, Jerome Powell, we are in \"extraordinary times\" of steady growth and low inflation.\nEconomic Growth\nEconomic growth remains firm in the US. Both the Institute for Supply Management leading indexes for manufacturing and non-manufacturing remain at very strong levels. Current activity indicators of real GDP growth average about 3.5% for the third quarter and closer to 4% for the fourth quarter. Forecasts for third quarter real GDP average 3.8% and fourth quarter forecasts are about 2.8%. While growth is slowing from the 4.2% estimate of the second quarter, it is still forecast to be above trend and we believe a modest slowdown is certainly preferable to continued growth at a pace that was likely unsustainable and possibly even inflationary.\nIn aggregate, the economic data since the intraday peak of US equities on September 21st does not point to any worrisome slowdown in GDP growth or the pace of employment. In fact, while the recent 134K increase in non-farm payrolls was less than expectations, revisions to earlier months offset the modest headline miss and the unemployment rate still fell to 3.7%. Furthermore, this 134k increase is above the estimated sustainable level of employment growth based on population growth and changes in labor force participation, which our colleagues in Goldman Investment Research estimate is around 96k. Importantly, a modest slowdown in the 3-month average of non-farm payrolls, which currently stands at a very robust 190k jobs, is more likely to keep inflation in check.\nRobust Earnings and Buybacks\nContinued above-trend economic growth is supporting solid corporate fundamentals. While many are quick to dismiss this strength to US tax reform, it is only half the story. Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) expanded by a very healthy 12% in the first half of this year and are expected to grow by double-digits again in the third quarter. This robust organic profit growth is also fueling sizable corporate buybacks—a key source of equity market support. Our colleagues on the corporate buyback desk expect the highest dollar amount for buybacks on record in 2018, with $1tn in authorizations and $850bn in executed buybacks.\nEven so, such robust earnings growth has begun to foster concern that we have reached a peak in EPS growth. While we do expect the pace of growth to slow next year, a local peak in earnings growth has not signified an imminent peak in the S&P 500 historically. In fact, about 3/4ths of market peaks occurred more than two years after the peak in the growth rate of earnings. Moreover, stock market returns have remained healthy during this period, with high odds of a positive outcome over the subsequent 6-24 months (see Exhibit 1). In short, the market ultimately follows the path of earnings and while their growth rate may be slowing, their absolute level is still rising.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.\nInflation and Interest Rates\nInflation data has remained at relatively low levels for all of 2018, as shown in Exhibits 2 and 3. In fact, some of the most recent data released in October have ticked slightly lower. Average hourly earnings dropped to 2.8% from the prior month's level of 2.9%. Headline CPI dropped to 2.3% from 2.7% and Core CPI ex-food and energy remain at a low 2.2%, unchanged from the prior month. The Federal Reserve's preferred inflation indicator, Core PCE, also remains low at 2.0% which is in line with the Federal Reserve's target, and unchanged from the prior month.\nWhile 10-year Treasury yields have risen by 0.76% (or 76 basis points) over the course of 2018, we do not think the resulting 3.2% yield is enough to derail US economic growth. Keep in mind that most of the recent increase since late August was due to stronger real growth rather than runaway inflation expectations. We expect interest rates to range between 3.0% and 3.5% in 2019 with a midpoint of 3.25%, barring any major geopolitical conflicts such as one between US and China and or escalating conflicts in the Middle East.\nNote: Average hourly earnings is available for the private sector starting in 2006 and is released in the monthly employment report. The BLS hourly earnings data for production and nonsupervisory employees, -80% of the private sector, is available back to 1964.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Haver.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Haver.\nOf course, the recent backup in interest rates is providing equity investors with another source of angst. Yet our work suggests there are several reasons why rates could continue to rise before becoming a material headwind for stocks. First, the 4% trend growth rate of nominal US GDP—reflecting 2% real growth and 2% inflation—remains comfortably above the 10-year Treasury yield of 3.2% (i.e. the cost of borrowing). Stocks typically struggle when the cost of borrowing exceeds the nominal growth of the economy (see Exhibit 4). Second, the recent backup in interest rates was driven primarily by improving real growth expectations, not higher inflation. This distinction is critical, because higher rates in response to improving real growth tend to benefit earnings sufficiently to overcome the downward pressure they place on valuation multiples. Finally, it will take a number of years before higher rates meaningfully impact aggregate S&P 500 interest expense, considering 91% of S&P 500 debt is fixed-rate and only 13% matures over the next two years.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group. Bloomberg.\nLow Probability of Recession\nWe continue to maintain a low, 10%, probability of recession driven by:\n• The positive trend of leading economic indicators\n• Low levels of inflation\n• The continued slow but steady pace of Federal Reserve interest rate hikes. We believe that Federal Reserve Chairman Powell's recent commentary indicates that the FOMC will continue to be driven by data and financial market conditions. Their stated goal is to extend this expansion \"indefinitely.\" While the Federal Reserve dots point towards four more interest rate hikes by the end of 2019, we do not think that such hikes materially increase the odds of a recession in an economy that continues to grow at levels that are generally regarded as above trend growth in the US.\nRecent steepening of the yield curve. We have highlighted two measures of the yield curve as sign-posts we watch as an early harbinger of a recession. Both have steepened since their lows, as shown in Exhibits 5 and 6.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.\n*\"Near-Term Forward Spread\" is the implied 3-month forward yield 18-months from now.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.\nUnsteady Undertow\nAs market observers attempt to explain the recent drop in US equities, the risks of geopolitical factors have garnered considerable attention. Potential US retaliation over the recent disappearance of a Saudi journalist has only added fuel to the fire of worries given the risk that oil exports could be used as a political weapon in a world with tighter oil supply thanks to impending US sanctions on Iran.\nAs we review the geopolitical developments of 2018, it is clear that some of the risks have abated while others have increased. With the exception of a significant spike in oil prices due to the impact of sanctions on Iran or any escalation in US-Saudi tensions, we believe that the net impact of these shifts is not material enough to derail the US economic expansion or bull market.\nRisks that have abated\nMexico: the election of the left-of-center populist president (Andres Manuel Lopes Obrador referred to as AMLO) has reduced fear of a reversal of recent reforms. While concerns about fiscal profligacy and reverting to a nationalist energy policy that reduces oil production may reappear, AMLO does not take office until the end of the year.\nBrazil: The strong showing of Jair Bolsonaro, a law-and-order former army captain, in the first round of elections and the latest data that points to a 75% probability of Bolsonaro becoming the next president of Brazil has provided a boost to the Brazilian real. His current standing has substantially reduced the election of another left-wing worker's party candidate who would keep the status quo in Brazil.\nNAFTA: The agreement on a revised NAFTA deal between the US, Canada, and Mexico on September 30th meaningfully reduced the risk of the US withdrawal from NAFTA. While the new agreement, US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), has not been ratified by the Mexican and Canadian national parliaments nor by the US congress, and a divided congress after the mid-term elections may lead to some uncertainty, we believe it is likely to be ratified.\nUS-EU Trade Friction: Tension between the US and European Union eased significantly after a July 2018 deal between European Commission President Juncker and President Trump to \"work together toward zero tariffs, zero non-tariff barriers and zero subsidies on non-auto industrial goods\". The coast is not totally clear given the threat of auto tariffs, but we do not anticipate any significant increase in trade rhetoric in the near future.\nRisks that have increased\nChina: The trade war with China continues to escalate and as we have stated before, we believe that it cannot be resolved simply by China importing more US goods. The issues range from:\n• A large and growing trade deficit with China\n• Industrial policies & unfair trade practices that reduce competition, such as subsidies and \"dumping good at below-market prices\"\n• \"Made in China 2025\" policies which \"harm US companies\"\n• Uneven tariff rates and the banning of some US goods\n• Intellectual property theft\n• Forced technology transfer\n• Strategic US technology acquisitions\n• Outright cyber theft\n• Foreign ownership restrictions\nRecent headlines that the trade war may be escalating to a cold war are not without merit, as we believe that US-China relations are changing on a more structural basis and will have a longer-term impact. On a short-term basis, however, US exposure to China is limited with merchandise exports, corporate profits and foreign claims at about 1% of GDP. As seen in Exhibit 7, the Chinese equity markets have also deteriorated much more significantly than US markets in 2018.\nOf course, specific stocks with greater exposure to China through higher sales have underperformed the S&P 500 by about 6% since the latest tariffs were imposed on $200bn of Chinese products, as shown in Exhibit 8.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.\nNote: High China sales basket is aggregated and defined by Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.\nItaly: Concerns about Italy have risen to peak levels since the election of a populist government in May and credit default swaps have increased to reflect these higher risks. The government's expansive fiscal plan, with a proposed budget deficit of 2.4% of GDP, may be rejected by the European Union commission and result in rating downgrades. While the EU is likely to manage this situation in its usual incremental and reactive way, the possibility of new elections in late 2019 reigniting euro viability questions will keep Italy on our radar screens.\nBREXIT: It is hard to know whether Brexit risks are unchanged, higher or lower given the minute by minute headlines out of the UK. Our base case remains that while the internal politics of the Conservative party will keep uncertainty at elevated levels and the European Union will not compromise on its key tenants of free movement of goods, services, and people, the two sides will agree to a deal that defers the difficult choices on the shape of a final agreement with the EU until late 2020.\nThe Middle East: Risks in the Middle East have not changed substantially with respect to Iraq, Syria, or even the impositions of sanctions on Iran. However, the disappearance of the Saudi journalist who entered the Saudi Embassy in Turkey on October 2nd has the potential to raise risks to global oil supply. While there has been a global uproar, it is not yet clear whether the US will impose serious sanctions or Saudi Arabia would retaliate by reducing oil exports if the US finds sufficient evidence regarding the alleged killing of the Saudi journalist. The recession in 1973-74 was partly due to the quadrupling of oil prices due to the Arab Oil Embargo. Later in that decade, the Iranian Revolution and the Iran-Iraq War also led to a 2.5 times spike in oil prices that, along with Federal Reserve tightening by then Chairman Paul Volcker, led to a US recession. While we think it is unlikely that Saudi Arabia would react so aggressively in the face of serious US reprisals, we note that it remains a real risk.\nSome Notable Observations\nUS Equities Have Been Shunned All Along\nIn both our 2018 Outlook and mid-year update, we highlighted the surprising absence of inflows into US equities based on flows into mutual funds and Exchange-Traded Funds. As shown in Exhibit 9, flows into US equities were negative in 2018, even before the recent downdraft. In fact, US equities have seen outflows of $81 billion through August 2018 (based on the most recent comprehensive data), while non-US developed equities and emerging market equities have had inflows of $72 billion and $20 billion respectively. This is further evidence of our view that while sentiment and short term positioning among speculators and hedge fund managers shifts frequently, more stable investors have shunned US equities during this long bull market in favor of other developed and emerging market equities and global bonds.\nThis steady outflow of assets from US equities has been offset by record levels of stock buybacks by US companies given high levels of profitability and incremental cash from repatriation of overseas earnings, as mentioned above.\nNote: Based on ICI weekly estimates through August 30,2018. Flows exclude reinvested dividends.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, ICI.\nSome Headwinds Facing the FANG MAN Stocks Will Persist\nThe basket of FANGMAN (i.e. Facebook, Apple, Netflix, Google, Microsoft, Amazon and Nvidia) stocks have dropped across the board from their respective peak price levels, with Facebook's 29% decline the largest and Apple's 4% decline the smallest among the group. Even so, each of the stocks, with the exception of Facebook, still have positive year-to-date returns and have outperformed the S&P 500, as shown in Exhibit 10.\nThis is not a recommendation to buy or sell individual securities but rather an assertion that these stocks represent a small portion of S&P 500 earnings. Anyone looking to buy or sell single name equities should consult Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.\nNevertheless, we believe that some of the headwinds that have plagued this sector will continue. These include:\n• Data privacy issues impacting a broad range of companies, including Facebook, Google, Twitter, Alipay and Tencent.\n• High likelihood of greater regulatory scrutiny in the US2 and Europe as policy makers increasingly believe that these companies will not address \"the privacy and security issues of social media users\"3 on their own.\n• Increased focus by ESG investors (Environment, Social, and Governance) that many of the technology and social media companies are falling short on social and governance issues.\nWhile this basket of stocks may or may not lead the market in the future, it is important to note that they represent only 10% of S&P 500 earnings.\nInvestment Implications\nThe recent market downdraft has understandably rekindled fears that the longest bull market in history is coming to an end. While there are no certainties in investing, we do not think the odds support that conclusion based on our read of the steady and unsteady factors discussed above. Keep in mind that about 75% of historical US bear markets—defined here as equity market declines of 20% or more—have occurred during economic recessions. In fact, US equity returns have remained favorable until about five to six months prior to the onset of recession, highlighting the penalty for prematurely exiting the market (see Exhibit 11). With only 10% odds of recession over the next year, we think the economic backdrop remains favorable for stocks.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.\nOf course, none of the supportive factors discussed above precludes further bouts of equity volatility. As we highlighted at the beginning of the year, the historical probability of a 5% or greater correction from current valuation levels was 96%. Yet these statistics alone do not justify underweighting equities, since such pullbacks often occur after sizable equity rallies, as this year reminds us. Moreover, such pullbacks are quite normal historically. After all, stocks have suffered a median of two pullbacks of at least 5% and one of at least 10% per calendar year in the post-WWII period, leaving both the frequency and magnitude of this year's dips in line with past experience. Most importantly, years that experienced a similar number of pullbacks as 2018 nonetheless ended with a median gain of 6% and had 77% odds of a positive return.\nConclusion\nAlthough we have painted a less alarmist view of recent market weakness, we are by no means Pollyannaish. While bull markets do not die of old age, they do become more susceptible to ailments over time. Yet as we survey the tug of war between the steady factors and the unsteady undertow, we do not think the balance of risks is strong enough to topple the ongoing US expansion and the continued growth of corporate earnings it supports.\nThat said, this viewpoint does not preclude further market volatility and the market may still make new lows if the current downdraft persists. But history suggests the bull market is likely to continue until about 5-6 months prior to the end of this economic expansion. Thus, it will take a significant increase in the odds of an imminent recession to provide the trigger—that has been lacking thus far—to tactically underweight equities. In the interim, we continue to recommend that clients maintain their strategic allocation to US equities.\nSources: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg, Datastream, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, Haver.\nEndnotes:\n(1) Kate Davidson and Sarah Chaney, \"Fed Chair Powell Sees 'Remarkably Positive Set of Economic Circumstances,- The Wall Street Journal, October 3, 2018.\n(2) Statement by the Acting Director of FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection Regarding Reported Concerns about Facebook Privacy Practices, March 26, 2018.\n(3)\nSenator Mark. R Warner, Press Release, September 28, 2018\nInvestment Strategy Group. The Investment Strategy Group (ISG) is part of the Investment Management Division of Goldman Sachs."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029578.txt_4516
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029578.txt
subject: Re: invitation
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed. \nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to \nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next \ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar \nthemes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young \ngirl. \nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \n\"bootleg\" episode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me \nand you were so kind to make it happen. \nLisa"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey, \nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "count how many times you say I or me?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:06 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "okay.... let me revise with I and me in mind before I talk to you. \nCan I call you tomorrow am?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:32 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "better?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Elisa New"], "timestamp": "11/26/2018 3:26:46 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "can you call me"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032486.txt_4517
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032486.txt
subject: Fwd: TR: TR: update
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 fevrier 2017 12:32", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "going to artists studio s much more appropriate , i think"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:49 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Gentlemen\nI hope you are having a great week.\nIn LA hoping to begin acquiring pieces: are we on?\nIf not yet, when please"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number I should reach.\nNot sure what got lost in translation here: never had the intention to go to any art fair or art show or anything of the kind.\nAll the artists we have in mind or send to you are people we have direct connections with. Not just their studio, but also their home. They are people the work of whom we follow, and many of them are already friendly (Arianna, Cali have had dinner or stayed home).\nThe idea is absolutely to have an impact on the ecosystem and to make a difference by supporting great artists when they need it.\nGalleries references are important, because galleries allow artist to reach a broader audience. We would go directly to the source.\nThis is why it's important for me to go to LA or Berlin (or elsewhere) because those artists are not rich yet, they dont travel so much. They belong to a scene, and it does make a big difference to them if you connect in person.\nThe spirit is to have an impact on young, talented folks, and absolutely to stay at the source.\nOnce again, not sure was drifted away from this in communication"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 fevrier 2017 18:40", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Feb 14, 2017, at 8:18 PM", "subject": "TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\nLatest from JE (indeed, encouraging)\nPlease let me know when account/wire are active, and how I can access internet banking and start the ball (in fact, it has started)\nall the best\ne"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "mercredi 15 fevrier 2017 13:00:07", "subject": "Re: TR: update", "body": "There is $1mm in the bank account. We can prepare checks or wires for you to sign upon request. This way book keeping gets done at same time. Just send back up with each request. How does that sound?"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "mercredi 15 fevrier 2017 18:15", "subject": "RE: TR: update", "body": "Thanks Darren\nGood news!\nI'm under the impression that checks will be exceptional (they are more cumbersome to handle), and we will use mostly wires.\nConsidering the time difference, my heavy travel and my own propension to do things at night and on week-ends I would much prefer having an internet code and be able to organize everything online when I need to.\nWhen I use Interaudi (my US bank), they can do that, store the recurring beneficiaries, and do wires in multiple currencies, but I am not familiar with DB.\nOf course, you could also have the same access and help me when needed.\nAlso, your point about bookkeeping is mitigated by the fact that, in any case, I will also need to have someone keeping track of the receipts and inventory, before shipping proofs to you. In any case there will be need for some work on my side before final filing is done.\nOn the other hand, if there is a \"checks and balances\" control issue, there could be a cap to my wiring powers (like the 10 K we discussed), that would be absolutely fine for me if this is the intent.\nPlease do let me know.\nWe can also talk about it (in Hawai now, free after 2 PM your time)\nIn any case, this is good and happy news. I'll review the first list of payments over the week-end.\nEtienne"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant <etienne.binant@...>", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 16, 2017 at 9:29:08 PM EST", "subject": "TR: TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\nI hope all is well\ncan you let me know if the below modus operandi works for you?\nall the best"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "2/17/2017 2:34:42 AM", "subject": "Fwd: TR: TR: update", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025651.txt_4523
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025651.txt
subject: Re: an article you may both hate. or like.
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:02 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:10 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Ps. My piece argued against fanaticism."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 18, 2015, at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "you can invite depp to visit us when you are in the caribean"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:26 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "When I was with him yesterday I told him we were going to caribbean and he asked where.. He has an island in bahamas, making you two the only people I know who own islands.. :) will ask him if he is free then. He is remarkable in new movie, though the film itself is not fantastic.. he is also a pretty good guitarist.. his show with alice cooper and joe perry in la was great."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "9/18/2015 6:30:01 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "or we can visit him on his"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026358.txt_4529
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026358.txt
subject: Miles and Cathy Alexander and Little St James island
messages:
  [{"sender": "Cathy Alexander", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg, Esq."], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 23, 2015, 2:21 PM", "subject": "Miles and Cathy Alexander and Little St James island", "body": "Dear Mr. Weinberg:\n\nI understand that you are looking for information regarding whether former President Clinton and former Vice President Gore and his then wife, Tipper, ever visited Little St. James. I was the Island’s manager from 1999 through 2007 and lived on the Island with my wife during that entire period. Regarding President Clinton, I will sign a sworn affidavit that I never met the man. As far as I know President Clinton was never on the Island. He was never there while I was present on the Island. If he had come to the Island while I was on holiday, my staff would have told me that President Clinton was on the Island while I was away. While I worked on Little St. James, I had been called back from holiday many times to help when any guests visited the Island. So, if President Clinton had come to the Island while I was away, I would have been called back to the Island for such a visit, and I never was.\n\nThe same is true for Vice President Gore and his wife Tipper. I never met them and as far as I am aware were never on Little St. James during the entire period that I was the Island manager.\n\nSincerely,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026663.txt_4531
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026663.txt
subject: Fwd: Alert - TIC Form SHC Deadline Approaching
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 7:04:23 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Alert - TIC Form SHC Deadline Approaching", "body": "not sure if this applies to Leon\nThe reporting threshold for Schedule 2 is $200 million in total fair value of all foreign securities owned by the SHC Reporter and not held with a U.S.-resident custodian"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030767.txt_4538
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030767.txt
subject: Re: crown prince
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "4/27/2017 12:57:44 PM", "subject": "Re: crown prince", "body": "yes great"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:56 AM", "subject": "Re: crown prince", "body": "Was with Bannon last night who was saying how much Trump liked deputy crown prince: \"Real guy's guy, he loved him. Thinks they can do stuff together.\""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023265.txt_4541
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023265.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": null, "subject": null, "body": "am concerned re brad taking barrys place re XXXX. In the beginning Barry will need to find and learn ACCURATE .. org charts. books , balance sheets . trust valuations. are all a part. Barry will need 2 months to just get his arm around what is there , this is before any needed modifications.,\n\na way overdue re- fresh of your estate plan. . clats , trust. partnerships. grats. Ilcs. bank accounts , filing requirements. etc. the long awaited review of the brh tra and shareholders agreement to see how they fit into new plan. . \"XXXXX\" planning. art partnership engagement .. , airplane re-do. , buying another. .? boat sale , Miami sale. . TRADING ACCOUNTS. . three years overdue. . an accounting system. fire john .. joslin stays for a year. or so. so does tom and . except for heather everyone should be replaced withnew. . Sell Artspace and shut down regan arts. . rationalize. cash flow reporting. cash mgmt. stock sales. sec irs. gaming. foreign reporting. the 8865 mess will take months to review now. . you CANNOT file unreviewed audited documents. .CANNOT!!! _ this will be very detailed work. . a self inflicted wound - all avoidable if professionals had been in place to limit . or contain it. . . you will need 3 new hires .as there is no one in your office that is truly an A player. I have great hope in Barry as you know. He will need to be trained. note\n\n; One year is my guesstimate After 4 years of telling you , that you could do better than Halperin, : im glad that you now are willing to follow barrys advice . I take no offense , in fact I take comfort in the fact that after only one conversation with Barry you are now convinced to make that change . will take a year or more.\n\nI expect as a friend you will understand that\n\nI will no longer , not even for one day , work on your affairs . without the compensation that is long overdue. . your unilateral idea of after care , not imposed on any other professional , except me, not paul weiss ,( caesars alone , a direct screw up on their part ) tom, akin, ,no one. needs toend.. you and I had previously agreed no more of that , and this after you decided not to pay me per our agreement. to be fair I can not say im surprised as you have email after email , stating that , if you save a great deal of money, you wont want to pay , so limit it to 40m per year. - water under the bridge\n\nIf I can find the time to work , on your project , which is not by any means certain as I have said, I hope you understand that it now will have to be under my standard terms and conditions. and well documented so as to avoid any more of the he said she said. I never want to have any more uncomfortable money moments with you , I find it very distasteful. . so to be clear , my terms are as follows. I will only work for the usual 40 million per year. It needs to be paid, 25 million upon signing an agreement . 5 million every 2 months thereafter for 6 months ie march may june . this can begin if 1 am able in January. I will immediately stop work , if the payment is not received. If you want me to work this year until Jan 15, it will be 10 million. paid upfront. after one year you will be left with a new estate plan a running office. staffed with professionals overseen by Barry. (hallelujah ) a tax plan . and an investment that returns more than any painting you could possible own. _. no agreement - no work. however - I of course will talk to Barry for the hour that i promised , and take your guidance as to what I should say.\n\nher the last two places. ?\n\nTo: Melanie Spinella i\n\nLeon please read the attached proposed response to the IRS_, see if you can understand it !!!._ Ive asked for are-do. and given prelimiary directions to Alan to have it edited over the weekend\n\nIf you are quarterbacking ,ok with me. just please let everyone know. you must deal with the outrageous incompetence in your family office .. Alans words \" but I was told that.. , but I was told by the office (sic) that ...., BUT 1 was told by joslin,. , but I was told by . \" why is leon blaming me for ..\""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032700.txt_4546
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032700.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023271.txt_4548
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023271.txt
subject: previously sent
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinlla (i i i Zi >)"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:52 PM", "subject": "previously sent", "body": "I heard you when you said you believed 1 had already been paid for the work that is now required. The art partnership has fully answered all your concerns and discharged all my obligations and more so. . ( FYI Carlyn's art partnership that you referenced is similar in only its title. ) You will also recall that you required that my payments be at the end of my work not at the beginning as everyone else's .( my work was never to include hours upon hours of training your staff). I eventually agreed, this of course should make clear that the 2014 tax year that will close Oct 2015 is not covered by our past agreement at all. I pointed this very fact out to you when I initially proposed a multi year agreement right out of the box. you said you preferred not. As you said ,I have produced results to date, far in excess of even my own exalted opinion of my projections. I have devoted a monumental amount of my limited amount of time-- way, way in excess of our agreement. I will be fair, I am willing to roll in the amount still outstanding from last year if that helps .. However, As my best student , and my only one, you are now capable of doing most, if not all, of the required work yourself. I can put my whiteboard away when you come to eat and just have fun, trade stories,. share moments ideas etc.. I am of course always available to guide you as a friend if you choose that route . always . It will take a great deal of your time , but you will not have to spend any more money on mine. Weare scheduled to meet fri at 430 , I leave at 5 am sat morning.So there are no surprises 50m for the year. . or 30m for until 7/15. you can roll the balance for last year as a concession. half up front. no more all at the end. ive spoken to brad every day. more questions than answers. joslyn cannot be left unsupervised. his answers are knee jerk . eillenn told me this , that the other"}, {"sender": "leon", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinlla (i i i Zi >)"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "previously sent", "body": "you were at 30 30/ meat 6040. ./ proposal 50/25 and in additon I would be allowed to recommend 15 from directly from your own foundation. All payments to be made in addtion to currently owed. so $40 on april 25 , $30 june 15 ,and the alreadly owed $10 as planned on oct 15. I would direct the 15 charity in the next 12 months, and the last 25 to be paid on conclusion."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spina i iii"], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:07 AM", "subject": "previously sent", "body": "you need to build an entire office from scratch. no question that was never my obigation, - systems , personel. finance tax, bookeeping, ,office. complinace. investment. monitoring, banking loans coming due , review. gs jpm gs, .. plane boat houses construction , new will,. phaidon sale. you are no further"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032714.txt_4550
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032714.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 3, 2018, at 9:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fur\nbook-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Sr CU", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 1:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im traveling to see terry and antonio in dubai and bahrain .. wish you were here .. weather is greatbid"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 8, 2018, at 2:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Me too"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2018 7:29:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2018-01-10/saudis-alarm-their-friends-more-than-foes-in-mideast-\npower-plays"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030773.txt_4553
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030773.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-\nsmear-c/"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:47 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Looks like I can't get away. But will be back in NYC on Sunday. Let me know when you're back too. I \nhave a bad feeling about this new Woody round. It could pull him into the general Harvey pool of the \ndespsied and shunned. Clearly what Ronan and company are hoping for. I think Bannon may be right. This \nis not going to end until Trump goes down."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:52 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Strange time I have two more friends up to bat"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "And they won't be the last. My buddy, Lorin Stein, who runs the Paris Review--the Paris Review for god's \nsake!--just went down. The 80-year-old father of my friend Rachel Horovitz--the playright Israel Horovitz--\nwhacked. Big names on the horizon: Michael Douglas, Larry Gagosian, and still my favorite, Arthur \nSulzberger."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:39 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you and i are old news? :) ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:52 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Cross your fingers."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 7:54:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "beleive you me , i do"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030015.txt_4557
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030015.txt
subject: Bill Clinton Encouraged Donald Trump to Run
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peter Attia", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/6/2015 12:41:53 AM", "subject": "Bill Clinton Encouraged Donald Trump to Run", "body": "Funny article\nBill Clinton reportedly had an intriguing phone call with Donald Trump weeks before his campaign launch\nRudolph W. Giuliani, Donald Trump, and Bill Clinton attend the 2008 Joe Torre Safe at Home Foundation Golf Classic at Trump National Golf Club on July 14, 2008, in Briarcliff Manor, New York.\nFormer President Bill Clinton and real-estate magnate Donald Trump reportedly had a phone conversation in May, only weeks before Trump launched his campaign.\nAccording to a new report from The Washington Post, Clinton called Trump in May and \"encouraged Trump's efforts\" to become more influential within the GOP, according to four \"Trump allies\" and one Clinton associate \"familiar with the exchange.\"\nFrom The Washington Post's Robert Costa and Anne Gearan:\n\"Four Trump allies and one Clinton associate familiar with the exchange said that Clinton encouraged Trump's efforts to play a larger role in the Republican Party and offered his own views of the political landscape.\"\n\"The tone of the call was informal and Clinton never urged Trump to run, the four people said. Rather, they said, Clinton sounded curious about Trump's moves toward a presidential bid and told Trump that he was striking a chord with frustrated conservatives and was a rising force on the right.\"\nHillary Clinton, Bill's wife, is the front-runner for the Democratic nomination for president in 2016.\nThe Clintons have long had ties with the real-estate magnate. As The Post notes, Hillary Clinton attended Trump's wedding in 2005, and the reality-television personality donated money to her past Senate campaigns, though he has also donated to several of his own Republican presidential rivals. He has said those donations were transactional.\nThe former president has spoken positively of Trump in the past.\nIn a 2012 interview with CNN, Clinton said he liked Trump, despite the real-estate mogul's controversial campaign to get President Barack Obama to release his birth certificate.\n\"Donald Trump has been uncommonly nice to Hillary and me. We're all New Yorkers,\" Clinton said. \"I like him. And I love playing golf with him.\"\nAides to both Bill Clinton and Trump did not comment on record to The Post.\nHillary Clinton's campaign also didn't respond to a request for comment.\nBill Clinton has occasionally doled out advice to Republican presidential candidates.\nIn 2012, Clinton reportedly gave former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) some tips before his successful debate with President Barack Obama, telling the governor how to appear in command onstage."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026677.txt_4558
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026677.txt
subject: Funny dog video of a dog gnawing at Donald Trump's hair.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Soon-Yi Previn", "recipients": ["Soon-Yi Previn"], "timestamp": "6/30/2017 2:23:16 AM", "subject": "Funny dog video of a dog gnawing at Donald Trump's hair.", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028882.txt_4560
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028882.txt
subject: writing up proposal
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/27/2014 1:48:05 PM", "subject": "writing up proposal", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nLarry has told me that you and a friend would like to contribute to my project (hallelujah and thank you a \nmillion times, Jeffrey) and that I ought to write up a proposal asking for 500,000. This is wonderful. If this \ncomes to pass, the best way for that money to come, I think, is as a gift to Poetry in America, an initiative at \nEdLabs at Harvard University. This will give me discretion over its disbursement to HarvardX and WGBH, but \nthis will be absolutely be a Harvard gift that will count as Campaign success and from which Harvard will take \nsome (but not as much)overhead. . So far the best finance people I've met are at EdLabs and they are happy to \nmanage these funds for me. There are other ways to give me this money that leave Harvard out, but my \nunderstanding is that your friend would like this to be a Harvard gift. \nHere's a draft of what I'd like to do with that money. \nI'd like 500,000 to do post-production and distribution of a whole historical period of American poetry (1914-\n1945 is what I'm thinking—Modernism) and including three episodes of tv. \nThe raw materials for that period include interviews with Bill Clinton (including footage not yet used by \nWGBH), Peter Gallison, Walter Isaacson, Lena Dunham, Woody Allen (whose lawyers didn't like our release a \nwhile ago, but we're hoping will soften over time), Harrison Ford (still a maybe), Robert Polito, Sarah Kay, Al \nFilreis, Rafael Campo, Susan Howe, kids from Nantucket High School, kids from Brookline High \nSchool, Alfre Woodard, Jane Pickering, Jay Parini, Ray Dalio, Leon Wieseltier, Richard Dawkins and others; \nand footage shot in Harlem, Greenwich Village, midtown, Chicago, London (if I have the money to hire a crew \nthere; don't now ), at museums including the Fogg, Harvard Museum of Natural History, Frost's house in Ripton \nVermont and more. \nThis allows the donor to give to a big Harvard Campaign priority, Teaching and Learning , by supporting Poetry \nin America, allowing me to produce the crucial segment of the online course with the highest (TV quality) \nproduction values and so also supplying higher quality video to WGBH as a way also to cut their costs. \nCurrently, HarvardX skimps (on lighting, for instance--see the Bill Clinton interview) and while WGBH ladles \nmoney raised by others into everything. I have been pounding away at my friends at WGBH and I know that \nWGBH producer will work with HarvardX if they can give him footage of the right quality. . That is, we'll use \nHarvardX as the backlot for WGBH so as to squeeze three episodes out for 250. \nThis proposal does not include experiments in schools or the curricular development into courses for teachers \nthat you've seen in other (million dollar ) proposals. But the courses for teachers can't happen before the \nfootage is developed, and these courses will have as their centerpiece the WGBH episodes, and so this funding \nwill make all the rest possible. \nI can polish this narrative and or edit it, if there are things you think I have wrong. \nAnd I can attach a draft budget based on real Harvard numbers (what my Harvard video editor, producer, media \nmanager cost) as well as a draft WGBH budget I'll now go an negotiate with them. Or we can do that at a \nsecond stage. \nLet me know what you think? And when are we reading Whitman together. Why don't we set a date for Feb \nwhen Poetry in America 3: Whitman is running online and we could screen a little video and then have a \ndiscussion around your table with you and some friends? \nLisa"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021749.txt_4563
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021749.txt
subject: Fwd: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case | Miami Herald
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke [a@...]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "3/14/2019 5:28:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case | Miami Herald", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["Darren indyke <_i— as"], "timestamp": "March 14, 2019 at 1:27:47 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case | Miami Herald", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031728.txt_4576
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031728.txt
subject: Nit
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/17/2017 1:42:03 PM", "subject": "Nit", "body": "Here we go again...\nhttp://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/alexander-acosta-trump-jeffrey-epstein-plea-225096"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026936.txt_4577
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026936.txt
subject: Michael Cohen says he’s postponing testimony over threats by Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/23/2019 7:12:03 PM", "subject": "Michael Cohen says he’s postponing testimony over threats by Trump", "body": "https://nypost.com/2019/01/23/mi chael -cohen-says-hes-postponing-testimony-over-threats-by-trump/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medi um=emai 1&utm_campai gn=news_alert&utm_content=20190123&tpcc=nypbreaking&mpweb=755-7579323-719004712"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032451.txt_4578
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032451.txt
subject: Re: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 6:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "Dear Jeffrey \nTwo questions. \n1—do you believe the stock market will continue to climb given what we have now seen of Trump-land? \n[Strictly confidential] \n2—what do you think of the attached (N=1)? You do not drink or smoke, probably do not inject etc. you swim \nor exercise every day, so your heartbeat is expected to be low and less variable than average. Is your ability to \npredict heart rate accurately—without holding your neck or wrist—positively related to your ability to succeed \nin the financial world—as the attached strongly suggests. Just give me and N=1. \nRemember you asked me, what does self-knowledge have to do with anything—and here is a most intriguing \nexample. \nI will send you a joke shortly \nAll best \nbob"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/3/2017 10:00:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: ", "body": "He is wrong about heart rate variability \nIncreased heat rate variability is a sign of Well Being even self awareness not decreased variability. It's a sign \nof adaptability and flexibility. \nRigidity stubbornness and inability to change are associated with decreased heat rate variability and sympathetic \noverdrive \nTrump would be an example of that \nLove IP"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032221.txt_4580
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032221.txt
subject: Re: Please
messages:
  [{"sender": "Linda Stone Tr", "recipients": ["Please"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:22 AM", "subject": "Re: Please", "body": "Please tell me Trump will not win the election...\nXO"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 12, 2015, at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Please", "body": "not sure,"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone PY", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/12/2015 1:40:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Please", "body": "Seriously?\nIt's a terrifying prospect...\n\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032927.txt_4592
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032927.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Greetings! Just got my hands on the itinerary. Alas, no St. Thomas. Back to the drawing board.\nHope you're well.\nBest, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 7:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hope thanksgiving is peaceful . miss talking to you"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 11:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And to you as well. We'll be at the Breakers en famille as of Tuesday evening.. Any chance to see you in\nthe Sunshine State?\n\nHugs, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 11:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I'll be there wed"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 2:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fabulous! May I buy you lunch?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "Nov 20, 2016, at 12:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "great great anytime at your convenience or you can come to the house ,"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 6:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey, sensational! I'll be there with bells ringing. High noon ok?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "11/20/2016 11:00:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "perfect"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030954.txt_4601
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030954.txt
subject: Fwd: Sultan Bin Sulayem
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jide Zeitlin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:55 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Thank you for the introduction. Do you have a better sense of what he needs? Also, what's his WhatsApp/mobile so I can confirm details for today?\n\nWhen's best on Friday for me to visit with you?\n\nBibi's speech was a bit of a dead letter on Europe."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 2, 2018, at 11:05", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "011971 50 644 8444 he is chairman of dubai world ports. african ports a new focus he built the palm islands. is totally trustworthy"}, {"sender": "Jide Zeitlin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Unfortunately, bin Sulayem and I did not meet. I was stuck at the White House and he had a narrow window before heading to Cyprus. I just sent him the following note:\n\n\"Good Morning, I hope your travels to Cyprus were smooth.\nOkey Enelamah, Nigeria's trade minister, stopped by my home this evening as he was still in town after Buhari's visit with Trump. He mentioned his discussions with you at WEF and afterwards. Separately, I spoke earlier with the Vice President.\n\nWhenever we meet, I have some thoughts that may be helpful to you.\""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "5/3/2018 1:46:48 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "fyi"}]


