# 0_raw_data

thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029013.txt_8034
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029013.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Jeff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "How plausible is idea that trump is real cocaine user?\nL"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/2/2016 12:26:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes. Let's briefly discuss. Can u have her write me."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033272.txt_8035
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033272.txt
subject: POTUS
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "1/30/2018 4:57:53 PM", "subject": "POTUS", "body": "Trump is due to arrive PBI Friday 6pm and depart Sunday 8:30pm\nTimes may change, I'll keep you posted.\nTeterboro is an arrival gateway to PBI when TFR is in effect, NO airMarshal is needed, just 24hour\nadvance Passenger list and Prescreening at departure airport.\nThx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027097.txt_8040
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027097.txt
subject: Re: B 727 thought
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrance Visoski <unknown>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2012, at 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Jeffrey,\nthis may be a long shot to save the Boeing deal, or if you think its a dead deal, disregard this.\nI thought there was a connection between Tarek and myself, I do believe one concern was operation of Boeing with\nflight crew. I know its his problem not ours, but may help make the sale happen,.\nI wrote this email for your review, if you think its worth sending, please critique, and let me know,. thank you:\nMr. Tarek El Sayed,\nI hope this email finds you well, and believe worth communicating my thoughts to you.\nI was surprised to hear that you decided against the purchase of our Super Boeing 727. I personally thought it was a great match\nfor your business needs in Qatar. If for any reason your decision was based on crew issues and charter needs in the Middle East,\nI'd like to share some information that might prove beneficial to making you reconsider this purchase.\nThe pilot candidates I have lined up for your interview along with the possibility of David Rodgers joining your flight department\nwere as follows:\n(at no time did I disclose location or persons to the following pilot candidates to protect your privacy.)\nRobert Breslin, who is the former Chief Pilot of Mr. Donald Trump, Mr. Breslin flew the Boeing 727 and Boeing 757 owned by Mr\nTrump. Mr Breslin is a fine man of 40 years of age estimate, with extensive VIP Boeing operations.\nJames Bartakowski, who has extensive flying experience in the Middle east, Africa and Europe regime. Mr. Bartakowski has also\nbeen involved in charter operations in Africa and Middle East and has contacted me on several recent occasions with charters for\nour Boeing 727, James has indicated there is the possibility of 40 — 60 hours per month charter operations for larger transport\ncategory aircraft in your area. I believe there is a growing need for charter in the business community in Qatar and neighboring\ncountries.\nBruce Jafahri, who is a current Boeing 727 captain who lived in Doha for two years, and familiar with international operations of\nBoeing 727 aircraft. Mr. Jafahri currently lives in California and ready for a new opportunity. Bruce is current in the Boeing 727 and\nalso flew Captain on the Boeing 747. Well qualified individual and personable.\nMr. El Sayed, as you have seen during our demo flight, our Boeing 727 is in impeccable condition, quite cabin and will provide\nmany years of charter and business flights your company. I believe the large business jet future in Qatar is growing and you will be\nleading its path, and your initial investment in this purchase will not come close with other aircraft options on the market as you\nmay have seen already.\nWe are currently completing the C2C check on the Boeing, and as we have done in the past, assure you it will be a fine aircraft\nwhen it leaves Flight Star Maintenance repair facility.\nSincerely,\nLawrance Visoski\nChief Pilot, JEGE Inc."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 10:21:24 A.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Call\nSorry for all the typos"}, {"sender": "unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "you want me to call Tarek, instead? just to confirm."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 4:57:10 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "yes"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029985.txt_8043
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029985.txt
subject: Fw: New York Post Morning Digest - July 1, 2016
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeff epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/1/2016 11:05:09 AM", "subject": "Fw: New York Post Morning Digest - July 1, 2016", "body": "Jeff: see top story. Below"}, {"sender": "New York Post <email@nypost.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:01:36 -0400 (EDT)", "subject": "New York Post Morning Digest - July 1, 2016", "body": "JULY 1, 2016\n\nOwner of iconic Brooklyn pizza joint gunned down in hit job\n\nThe co-owner of iconic Brooklyn pizzeria L&B Spumoni Gardens was shot to death in a targeted hit outside his Brooklyn home Thursday night. Police found the slumped body of Louis Barbati, 61, at his home on 12th Avenue in Dyker Heights at about 7 p.m. with gunshot wounds to"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032622.txt_8045
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032622.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "are we meeting in new york?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:42 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now i"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "when is good for you? late thurs? fri lunch whatever you prefer."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<_______________________"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "1", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "<", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food°"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<_______________________"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<__________________________"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy. He would like to take all the credit. If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": "<_______________________", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "<11011", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "hi habebey i m in new york .. the sooner we meet the faster i go back to be with my son on his first week in a new school.. if you bussy dont worry i can wait until thursday thnx again"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<__________________________"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:46 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Wed at 2?"}, {"sender": "<__________________________", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 13, 2017, at 10:06 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "your gifts were unncessary but greatly appreciated"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/13/2017 11:59:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i enjoyed it e .. see you in november inshalla"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032052.txt_8046
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032052.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 7:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Went to opening of war paint last night was sitting next to john Connolly at after party he is on to his next book about\nEf Hutton murders apparently was going to put me in your book because | was in your visitors list but somers and\nMargo nederlander asked him not to which pisses me off | have never been in a big book before and | think it would\nhave been great and they never even asked me | told him about how you called Apple best jonathan"}, {"sender": "oxen ps gem", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 8:11 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you want me to arrange it? be careful"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["oxen ps gem"], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 8:06:20 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im happy to meet him"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["oxen ps gem"], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 8:21:25 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why dont you suggest to him that the real money making book is getting to the truth ofthe claims. — unvierstiy of\nvirgina. no penalty for fals accusations. . hockey team no penalty for accusations. . trump 13 yeara old rape\naccusation nopenaltiy etc. mineis ripe with same"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 12:28:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i asked him about trump and russians he said maybe some truth there,If you want to meet him just give me the wordjf"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030889.txt_8058
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030889.txt
subject: RE:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Saturday, April 02, 2011 6:09 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "in paris,, emailed steve - no response yet,, you wanted me to meet someone here, I forgot who. . may 2 will be\naneye opener . I read the vanity fair piece. .\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-\n\nepsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/3/2011 2:40:39 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "I will email Steve and Lawerence.\nI am curious what you think about Vanity fair piece?\n\nHow the daily beast knows about that dinner with woody allen and the crew?\nWho would know that? Some of your employees?\n\nB"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030651.txt_8064
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030651.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/3/2017 12:39:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "U rso right Bannon will be gone by Sept - too out front taking glow off DJT"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, February 3, 2017 7:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "does he turn on bannon soon as bannon is getting too much attention and power"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029910.txt_8068
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029910.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Aug 8, 2016, at 9:55 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "glenn?"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:39 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I'm working on a date. Just finished presentation on leadership to grand pooh baahs of Aspen Strategy Group. Take a look at members it will make you laugh. Certainly made me laugh when they asked me to do it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 08, 2016 2:45 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "who attends"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/8/2016 9:28:25 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "You have to be a bit of a wonk to know some of the names, but Nye, Scowcroft and Nick Burns run it (Scowcroft being replaced by Condi). Members include Patraeus, Albright, Slaughter, Donalon (Obama NSA), Hadley (Bush NSA), Sullivan (NSA Hillary), Bill Burns (State #2), Kurt Campbell, Hoss Carwright (#2 it Chiefs), Harman, Ignatius, Sanger, Nunn, Reed, Sawers (M16), Sherman (iran deal), Work (current #2 DoD). It seems to now be taking on an aura. Looking for a time to come catch up in NY."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030218.txt_8070
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030218.txt
subject: FW: Library
messages:
  [{"sender": "Brandon Thompson <brandonthompson@??>", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 7:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Library", "body": "Dear Richard,\n\nFor the first time in my life, I am facing the real prospect of dismissal from the project.\n\nThis is due mainly to misunderstanding.\n\nMr. Epstein came today and told me very bluntly that he is annoyed with me not doing the job. I prepared one column for him\nand the several feet of decorative molding, but this was a miss. He told me it looks like it was done yesterday.\n\nThis is the very first time that I work like this. I did several projects for French customers in Greenwich, Conn., but always\nI produced the sample and than work\n\naccording to the samples. The paneling I work on were early 19 c. so even the oak looked different. Even at the White House,\nwhen I was restoring Blue Room, which you can look at it on my Website, www.brandonthompsonrestoration.com I produced\ndesign, made samples and did the project. President Clinton told me this is the most beautiful Room, he was clearly\nimpressed.\n\nThis time I know exactly what Mr. Epstein wants. However it might be too late. He will come tomorrow to check.\n\nToday I did a lot of prep work for tomorrow. I will go tonight to work on some of the columns but the night light is deceiving\nand I may miss the last chance he gave me.\n\nSo far I was rated the best finisher, until now I guess.\n\nWarm regards\n\nBrandon"}, {"sender": "Brandon Thompson", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Library", "body": "Dear Richard,\n\nthe samples are ready for approval. I finished one column about 95%, as I want to put some accents on it but after I discuss it\nwith Mr. Epstein. I also finished upper section above the blackboard. I also finished some other columns, not completely,\nbecause I need the approval. My feeling is that someone was already working in the Library, as I can see a lot of waxing done.\nI finished one column so it will correspond with the rest of the décor. You can not remove the whitish color completely.\nThere are some \"bald\" columns, which in my opinion do not sort of belong to the Library any more as they are completely\nbrown. Everything has to have at least an shadow of what is around. The top carving, moldings columns and other elements\nin the Library, have to \"bond\" together. The upper small carvings, have to be finished individually, as a play between the\nwhitish color and natural brown color of oak wood. I sort of model the shapes of the crabs, snails and other creatures and\nthey come alive. I think I did good work but Mr. Epstein needs to approve it so I can go ahead and finish the project.\n\nKindly,\n\nBrandon"}, {"sender": "Brandon Thompson", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 11, 2015 at 6:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Library", "body": "Dear Richard,\nI prepared some samples for Mr. Epstein for today. I did not waist time as there is a lot of work in the Library. However,\nI need his approval to continue. Tonight I will go back and start installation of the doors and panels."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033528.txt_8071
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033528.txt
subject: AICE Update: Is UNRWA vital for the Palestinians' future?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mitchell Bard", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/10/2019 12:46:19 PM", "subject": "AICE Update: Is UNRWA vital for the Palestinians' future?", "body": "Is UNRWA vital for the Palestinians' future?\nA great international hue and cry followed the \nTrump administration's announcement the \nU.S. would no longer fund the UN Relief and  \nWorks Agency (UNWRA) because it is an \n\"irredeemably flawed operation.\" Historically, \nthe United States was the organization's \nbiggest funder — in 2017, the U.S. covered \nnearly one-third of the agency's budget of $1.1 \nbillion. Angered by the Palestinians' refusal to \n- \nrestart peace talks with Israel, however, the administration cut its \ncontribution in early 2018 from $364 million to $60 million before \nceasing payments altogether.\n\nHow Obama Blew the Chance for Economic Peace \nby Mitchell Bard \nIln 2009, Barack Obama had an \nunprecedented opportunity to advance the \npeace process between Israel and the \nPalestinians. For the first time, the \nPalestinians had a prime minister who was \nrespected and admired by the Israelis, \nbecause he did not come from the same \nterrorist background as Yasser Arafat and \nMahmoud Abbas. Unlike his ideological \ncomrades who insisted on \"liberating Palestine,\" Salam Fayyad, was \ninterested in building the infrastructure for a future state, \nstrengthening the West Bank economy, and improving the lives of the \nPalestinian people.\n\nLast Survivor of Sobibor Uprising Dies \nOn June 3, 2019, Semyon Rosenfeld, the last living Holocaust \nsurvivor who participated in the revolt and escape from the Sobibor \ndeath camp, died at the age of 97 in Israel. Rosenfeld joined the Red \nArmy in 1940. While he was fighting the Germans, his family was \nkilled by the Nazis. He was captured by the Germans in 1941 and, \ntwo years later, he was transferred to Sobibor. Rosenfeld escaped \nduring the revolt and survived by hiding in the woods until 1944. He \nthen rejoined the Red Army and participated in the capture of Berlin.\n\nViews on Israel of U.S. Presidential Candidates 2020:  \nJoe Biden  \nFormer Vice President Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., was born \nNovember 20, 1942, in Scranton, Pennsylvania, the first of four \nsiblings. In 1953, the Biden family moved from Pennsylvania to \nClaymont, Delaware. He graduated from the University of Delaware \nand Syracuse Law School. \nOne of his first overseas visits as a senator was to Israel, on the eve \nof the 1973 Yom Kippur War during which he met GoIda Meir. \"She \nread letters and told me how this young man or woman had died and \nthis is their family. This went on for I don't know how long, and I guess \nshe could tell I was visibly moved by this, and I was getting depressed \nabout it.\" The Prime Minister said, \"Senator, don't look so sad... .we \nhave a secret weapon in our confrontation in this part of the world. \nAnd I thought she was about to lean over and tell me about a new \nsystem or something... .she said, our secret weapon, Senator, is we \nhave no place else to go. We have no place else to go.\""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030299.txt_8072
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030299.txt
subject: Fwd: Fw: Epstein News Articles
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Reiter/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Joyce"], "timestamp": "08/12/2008 09:33PM", "subject": "Epstein News Articles", "body": "I am looking forward to meeting with you on Wednesday. Please find below (and attached as a PDF file), some background information for your reference. Thanks for agreeing to have this discussion.\n\nRegards,\n\nMike"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:01 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein News Articles", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert D. Critton Jr.", "Jessica Cadwel"], "timestamp": "2/26/2010 6:41:25 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein News Articles", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032636.txt_8074
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032636.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Sunday, October 15, 2017 5:59 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "\"In the last 10 months, we have followed through on one promise after another,\" Mr. Trump told the Values Voter Summit in Washington. \"I didn't have a schedule. But if I did have a schedule, I would say we are substantially ahead of schedule.\""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/15/2017 4:11:25 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Is the point of this he is totally divorced from reality?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030647.txt_8084
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030647.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 5:11:02 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Thought you might be interested in this--it's suddenly made me the only liberal-media guy with access to Trump circle. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-strategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747\n\nAnd... have a bit of an idea for you re media and Saudi friends."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020815.txt_8089
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020815.txt
subject: Fw: WSJ
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/13/2018 11:02:26 AM", "subject": "Fw: WSJ", "body": "Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T"}, {"sender": "Alexandra Preate", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, 12 May 2018 08:23:58 -0400", "subject": "WSJ", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031559.txt_8091
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031559.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ken Str rr"], "timestamp": "May 19, 2018, at 10:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my good friend michael wolffe of FlIre and Fury fame, .wanted to speak to you totally off the\n\nrecord. thoghts? he wanted some color on indicting a sitting pres, between us , he has seen a draft of one.\n. ) what does not subject to crimnal process mean. ? Jassume trump corp has non of the consiutuional\nbaggage?"}, {"sender": "Ken Str rr", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/19/2018 5:07:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Happy to do so. Feel free to give Michael my email address.\nHugs, Ken"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032050.txt_8094
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032050.txt
subject: The New York Times: Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribs", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/22/2019 10:56:44 PM", "subject": "The New York Times: Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business", "body": "Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business\nThe New York Times\n\nPresident Trump’s former lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, discussed possible irregularities at the Trump\nOrganization. He wants a reduced prison sentence. Read the full story\n\nShared from Apple News"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027095.txt_8102
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027095.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis <________________________________1>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 9:04 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Looks like Mick Mulvaney is out before he starts - knew it after his comments about DJT came public-"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 23, 2018, at 9:43 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i have not seen, is he out?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/23/2018 4:04:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Not yet but DJT not speaking to him with family that's why I cannt talk"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032634.txt_8115
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032634.txt
subject: SIT
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "9/30/2017 5:43:18 PM", "subject": "SIT", "body": "I hear Pres Trump arrives in St Thomas on Tuesday FYI \nThx \nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029912.txt_8119
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029912.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Aug 8, 2016, 9:55 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "glenn?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 08, 2016 2:45 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "who attends"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "I'm working on a date. Just finished presentation on leadership to grand pooh baahs of Aspen Strategy Group. Take a look at members it will make you laugh. Certainly made me laugh when they asked me to do it."}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "You have to be a bit of a wonk to know some of the names, but Nye, Scowcroft and Nick Burns run it (Scowcroft being replaced by Condi). Members include Patraeus, Albright, Slaughter, Donalon (Obama NSA), Hadley (Bush NSA), Sullivan (NSA Hillary), Bill Burns (State #2), Kurt Campbell, Hoss Carwright (#2 it Chiefs), Harman, Ignatius, Sanger, Nunn, Reed, Sawers (M16), Sherman (iran deal), Work (current #2 DoD). It seems to now be taking on an aura. Looking for a time to come catch up in NY."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "8/8/2016 9:30:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "im in santa fe for the next two weeks come visit"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030653.txt_8120
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030653.txt
subject: crown prince
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/27/2017 12:56:47 PM", "subject": "crown prince", "body": "Was with Bannon last night who was saying how much Trump liked deputy crown prince: \"Real guy's guy, he loved him. Thinks they can do stuff together.\""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030232.txt_8132
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030232.txt
subject: Daily Mail
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ross Gow", "recipients": ["Ross Gow", "Ghislaine Maxwell", "Kevin Maxwell", "Brian Basham", "Gareth Thompson", "ia"], "timestamp": "10 March 2011 7:48 AM", "subject": "Daily Mail", "body": "Mail have published phone logs\n\nhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-Epstein-The-damning-telephone-log.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031565.txt_8139
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031565.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/13/2018 10:03:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Read it. TB has big problems"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 13, 2018, at 5:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Federal prosecutors are investigating whether U.S. President Donald Trump's inaugural\ncommittee misspent some of the funds it raised, the Wall Street Journal reported on\n\nThursday, citing people familiar with the matter.\n\nThe probe opened by the Manhattan U.S. attorney's office is examining whether some of the\ncommittee's donors gave money in exchange for policy concessions, influencing\nadministration positions or access to the incoming administration, the Journal said.\n\nRead Newsmax: WSJ: Federal Prosecutors Probing Trump Inauguration Spending\nUrgent: Do you approve of Pres. Trump’s job performance? Vote Here Now! --"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031203.txt_8142
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031203.txt
subject:
  Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN

messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Bennet J. Moskowitz"], "timestamp": "7/13/2016 1:37:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Steven Hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "July 13, 2016 at 4:45:18 AM PDT", "subject": "Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033264.txt_8145
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033264.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 6:00:32 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029084.txt_8146
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029084.txt
subject: Fwd: From Politico Magazine
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joi", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/12/2016 6:26:29 PM", "subject": "Fwd: From Politico Magazine", "body": "Any ideas?"}, {"sender": "Margaret Slattery", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "November 28, 2016 at 3:04:51 PM CST", "subject": "From Politico Magazine", "body": "Dear Joi, \n\nHello, I'm writing from Politico Magazine, where we're working on a special package of stories timed to Donald Trump's \ninauguration in January, and I wondered if you would be interested in contributing. \nAs he prepares to take office, our plan is to publish a handful of out-of-the box ideas for President Trump, suggested by \nwriters and thinkers from a variety of fields and ideological positions. Whether the idea has to do with politics, policy, \npersonnel or governing style, we're looking for suggestions that are specific and, above all, surprising; something inventive if \nslightly far-fetched is better than a pet cause or a well-trod policy proposal. (This exercise doesn't require that you support or \neven agree with Trump, but it does require a willingness to engage.) \n\nDo you have an idea along these lines that you wish the new president would consider, whether something in economics or \notherwise? If so, I'd love to hear, and we can discuss next steps from there. Ultimately, we're aiming to publish a handful of \nshort pieces (about 800 words each) as a package of proposals. \n\nMany thanks, and please let me know if you have questions."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029005.txt_8149
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029005.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Le rere oTSTTRTOTON", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "We already have plans on Sunday as | didn't hear from you. I don't think I can change them."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 6:50 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trumps guys changing their plans _ . all at the trump hotel right down the street from the white house. its a bad movie. president trump. down the street from trump hotel. deepak chopra , again, sunday , I know you moved krause to tonight. ."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no problem , I thought you told me that you had moved krause so that you could come sunday. . i must have misunderstood. . the sweatshirts were given to a few world leaders yesterday, so i thought you two should also have some. ."}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 8:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you for the sweatshirts. The thought was very sweet. Next time you send a gift don't put any initials on it so when I regift it no one will suspect. Also in the future think jewelry. You didn't misunderstand. With you I never know what your plans are so since I didn't hear a confirmation from you or your assistant I assumed your plans had changed and you weren't able to do dinner. Just like the Paris trips :-)."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 8:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im surprised you didnt call to confirm? :). re regifting you just have to find people wth the same initials. . ithought that woody might like to try something that is super soft and doesnt have holes"}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/17/2016 12:33:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I didn't call to confirm because I attributed it to your scatterbrained quality and I just assumed that plans had changed and you weren't able to make it. In this civilized society the person being invited doesn't usually have to hound the host. And incidentally Woody doesn't feel dressed unless his clothes have holes in them."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033270.txt_8151
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033270.txt
subject: EUR
messages:
  [{"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/25/2018 7:43:30 PM", "subject": "EUR", "body": "Any thoughts on the EUR up here? I just bought some 3 month puts as I think Trump will push the strong USD policy tomorrow."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029090.txt_8153
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029090.txt
subject: Re: Greetings from Japan
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeremy Rubin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/4/2017 4:18:58 AM", "subject": "Re: Greetings from Japan", "body": "Are you around here?"}, {"sender": "Jeremy Rubin", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Greetings from Japan", "body": "Feb 12th."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Greetings from Japan", "body": "how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "Jeremy Rubin", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Greetings from Japan", "body": "Hey Jeffrey, \nThought I'd check in and see what's up on your end. \n- I've been watching closely Trump's appointees and there, he might be putting Balaji (a big \nbitcoiner) as FDA head, and Allison seems to be somewhat in favor of something like Bitcoin. And \nof course, Thiel has said that Bitcoin is what Paypal should have been... Curious to hear where \nyour head is at on this matter. \n- Last week, I presented my research at Stanford's BPASE, it was well received. The most \ninteresting thing I came up with for that is an inverse-input contract; i.e., funds that are \"locked\" to \nbe spent only in the case where there are other funds that are not used in a specific way. An \nexample of something that could be built with this: a matching donation contract, where you agree \nto donate your money to charity if someone else donates to charity, and you would not be able to \nrelease your funds from that agreement until they use their funds not for charity. \n- I'm in Japan this week, teaching a class to 100 Japanese Engineers to get the up to speed on \nbitcoin (with DG). It's very interesting to see the trepidation first hand that they have with respect to \nthe technology, despite their debit-based society being more geared for it in any case (DG felt that \neven putting Bitcoin in the course name would scare away students). One of my friends (a hedge \nfund manager) told me that female japanese engineers are very good, and drastically under-\nvalued. I made sure to get a few invited to the class, we'll see if he's right. On the whole, it will be \ninteresting to see the caliber of engineer Japan has to offer on this front. \nBest, \nJeremy"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031217.txt_8156
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031217.txt
subject:
  Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable

messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Reiter/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Margie"], "timestamp": "07/10/2008 02:36PM", "subject": "Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": "\" As you know, nothing too big or too small for us, especially in the summer\" Hmmmmm. I have to be\ndirect -- you or someone at your paper was very astute in checking the Clerk and Comptroller's computer\nand activity in the Epstein case two days before the hearing. As result, you sent me a text message on\nSaturday asking what the activity was about and I confirmed that the plea would take place. You were\nthe only member of the news media that I talked with. And yet, after the case is completely over, the\nPalm Beach Daily News' editorial staff remains silent on the topic.\n\nThanks,\nMike"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:58 AM", "subject": "Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Vartin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "2/26/2010 2:59:54 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- | apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030226.txt_8170
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030226.txt
subject: Daily Mail
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ross Gow", "recipients": ["Ross gow", "ee", "fan Maxwell", "Kevin Maxwell", "Brian Basham", "Gareth Thompson"], "timestamp": "10 March 2011 7:48 AM", "subject": "Daily Mail", "body": "Mail have published phone logs\n\nhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-Epstein-The-damning-telephone-log.html"}, {"sender": "Ross Gow", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "10 Mar 2011, at 07:35", "subject": "Daily Mail", "body": "\"Epstein’s Gulfstream flew in to RAF Marham with him and the Duke’s friend Ghislaine Maxwell\non board, before they enjoyed the Duke’s hospitality at the Queen’s Norfolk estate 20 miles\naway...\""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026115.txt_8171
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026115.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 at 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow | wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Call me now if u can"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028482.txt_8172
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028482.txt
subject: Fw: The Iran Nuclear Deal
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mike Cohen", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 03, 2015 7:16 PM", "subject": "FW: The Iran Nuclear Deal", "body": "Dear Friends,\n\nPLEASE watch this very important short and incredibly clear video regarding the Iran deal.\n\nIf you have not yet called your congressmen and asked other friends and relatives to do so, PLEASE do that as well. The wellbeing of your children and grandchildren depend upon it!\n\nMike"}, {"sender": "Mike Cohen", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:00:42 +0000", "subject": "FW: The Iran Nuclear Deal", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Allen West", "Rafael Bardaji", "Philip Kafka", "Lisa Albert", "Janet Katka", "James Ramsey", "ACT for America", "John Zouzelka-Cell", "Kate McClain", "Taal Safdie", "Uri Fouzailov", "Neil Anderson", "Nate White", "Rita Hortenstine", "Henry Hortenstine", "Gary Gross", "Forrest Miller", "Adj Kearsarge House", "Bennett Schmidt", "Val Sherman", "Marcie Brown", "Mark Epstein", "Meg", "Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Michael Stechel", "Michael Buchholtz", "Michael Horowitz", "Marshall Funk"], "timestamp": "8/4/2015 10:23:22 PM", "subject": "Fw: The Iran Nuclear Deal", "body": "Pls spent 2 minutes and watch this dennis prager video on iran deal. And then forward it if you agree. If not, I understand and just delete. Respectfully, terry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031152.txt_8177
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031152.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, November 08, 2011 04:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "In taking his case to Washington, Mr. Aliyev has variously sought safe passage to the United States, help in recovering $2 billion that relatives claimed they lost from seized businesses, or at least the satisfaction of embarrassing Mr. Nazarbayev. For his part, the Kazakh leader wants to make sure that the Americans stay out of the dispute, and not allow it to affect their alliance with his government. The Obama administration has done just that. Through comments in secret diplomatic cables, the former ambassador to Kazakhstan made clear his wariness of being drawn in. \"Both sides — the government and Aliyev — seek to manipulate us to their own advantage,\" Richard E. Hoagland, who ended his term as United States ambassador early this year, wrote in February 2009 in one of more than a dozen State Department cables obtained by the antisecrecy group WikiLeaks that mentioned the dispute. [*] Mr. Nazarbayev, 70, [*]a former steel worker and Soviet-era Communist Party leader, has been in power for two decades, presiding over Central Asia's most vibrant economy. Human rights activists, however, have long accused him of persecuting dissidents and political opponents. Mr. Aliyev, 48, [*]has served as chief of the tax police, deputy foreign affairs minister and head of the Kazakh equivalent of the K.G.B. But critics say he used his clout to secretly take over private companies for financial gain, often by threatening violence. Now hiding somewhere in Europe, he has been convicted back home on what he claims are trumped-up criminal charges, including a coup attempt. His wife divorced him in June 2007, and the Kazakh government has taken businesses owned by him and members of his extended family. [*] No longer powerful at home, Mr. Aliyev turned to Washington, knowing that his former father-in-law cared greatly about his reputation there. Early in 2008 he hired RJI Government Strategies, a small Washington lobbying group whos e consultants included Tanya Rahall, sister of Representative Nick J. Rahall II, a West Virginia Democrat; and a friend of Representative Darrell Issa, Republican of California. Both congressmen were booked on a trip to Kazakhstan to discuss energy policy with Mr. Nazarbayev. Before their departure, members of___________________________to urge him to express strong concerns about the harm done to a relative of Mr. Aliyev named Devincci Hourani, whose oil-company assets in Kazakhstan were seized, according to a letter to Mr. Issa from RJI. Mr. Issa, who had developed a rapport with the Kazakh president on an earlier visit, nonetheless agreed to take up the plight of Mr. Hourani. Though he stepped into the fight, he still maintained a close connection to the president, nominating him that summer for the Nobel Prize, a move that drew ridicule from human rights activists. [that's right, of Vista, CA] [*] Ms. Rahall worked on behalf of Mr. Aliyev and later for Mr. Hourani through 2010, contacting the offices of at least two dozen members of Congress. They included Representative Howard L. Berman, Democrat of California, then chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, whose office said he discussed the dispute with the State Department. Ms. Rahall also pursued a second strategy. \"The alternative is to embarrass the existing regime,\" she wrote in a July 2008 e-mail to her boss. She pressed House members to criticize the Kazakh government's human rights record. At her request, at least five statements were published in the Congressional Record, one citing Mr. Aliyev as a victim of his government. Separately, Mr. Aliyev offered to provide the Justice Department with documents that he claimed could prove that his former father-in-law accepted bribes from a businessman representing American oil companies that were seeking drilling rights in Kazakhstan"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 3:42 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Huh9999999999999"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, November 08, 2011 11:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you friends are all connected."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:28 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Laughing very hard... are you there?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 09, 2011 7:44 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "call me 133144170210"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Weird day...some poor soul jumped in front of my speeding Acela to commit suicide...quite a mess...just back in d.c....where are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 09, 2011 04:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "same paris number 331 441 70210"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Been preoccupied with ukraine...creeps...trip next week in doubt...will report tomorrow...too annoyed to talk tonite..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 09, 2011 10:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "time to relax. go get a massage"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "11/10/2011 2:46:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "I wish"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030684.txt_8182
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030684.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-smear-c/"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Looks like I can't get away. But will be back in NYC on Sunday. Let me know when you're back too. I have a bad feeling about this new Woody round. It could pull him into the general Harvey pool of the despised and shunned. Clearly what Ronan and company are hoping for. I think Bannon may be right. This is not going to end until Trump goes down."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Strange time I have two more friends up to bat"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 4:57:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And they won't be the last. My buddy, Lorin Stein, who runs the Paris Review--the Paris Review for god's sake!--just went down. The 80-year-old father of my friend Rachel Horovitz--the playright Israel Horovitz--whacked. Big names on the horizon: Michael Douglas, Larry Gagosian, and still my favorite, Arthur Sulzberger."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023028.txt_8187
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023028.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 122 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": ["Ww ve", "Nick Pykc Es | i7 Harty"], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial\nand the witness list which namesfjand other young women who allege they were underage\n\nvictims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their\nclaims.\n\nMs BE curther has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and\ninstructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter."}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 8:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Fred Haddad", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/19/2013 1:36:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026348.txt_8194
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026348.txt
subject: Fwd: fact checking questions for New York Magazine story
messages:
  [{"sender": "Yablon, Alex", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:23 AM", "subject": "fact checking questions for New York Magazine story", "body": "Hi Jeffrey, \nSorry for the phone tag. In case it's easier to respond by email, I have put my questions below. I'm at my desk and should be \nhere until 5, and should be free on my cell phone after 6:30. \nBest, \nAlex\n\n-what is the square footage of your Manhattan home? \n-do you work on a laptop from your dining room, with a large white board for notes and several pairs of reading glasses close at \nhand? Is the dining room windowless? \n-do paparazzi often camp outside your home? \n-did Michael once visit on the same day as a head of state who'd had a police escort? \n-did you tell Michael about a dinner you'd hosted for six tech entrepreneurs who had a combined worth of several hundred \nbillion dollars? When was this meal? \n-Do you believe that there are now more people who possess Roosevelt or Carnegie-levels of wealth, the sort that can rival \ngovernments in influence? That these people face unusual challenges when entering philanthropy due to the sheer size of \ntheir fortunes? That the rich may know the business that made them rich, but not money itself? \n-are you interested in what will happen to the $4.2 trillion possessed by the super-rich in 40-odd years once they have mostly \ndied? \n-Do you believe no superrich people want to give their entire fortunes to their children for fear of how it might affect them? \n-do you advise the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on how to convince other billionaires to join their initiatives? \n-did you volunteer to invest $20 million dollars in Michael's attempt to buy New York Magazine in 2004? \n-do you believe the recent claims about Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew in relation to you are \"ludicrous\" ? \n-When you met Michael for lunch in the West Village, was it the first time in 10 years you'd gone to lunch at a restaurant? \n-Do you have a support staff of young women in their 20s and 30s? Have some of them worked for you for many years, through \ntheir own marriages and as they raise families? Have any of these employees been romantically involved with you? When \nMichael came to your home, had one of these women recently gone on an around the world honeymoon, which you \narranged? Do they often travel with you to your other homes — in New Mexico, Paris, Palm Beach, and in the Caribbean? Do \nyou maintain there is no quid-pro-quo in the relationships with these women? Do these women often socialize with the policy \nmakers and businessmen with whom you often meet? \n-Is your current girlfriend a dental student you met four years ago at a dinner party in New York? \n-Did you date Eva Andersson Dubin? Have you known her for 30 years? Did you pay for her to go to medical school? \n-when you take meetings in your Manhattan dining room, do you take your guests out to a Sabrett hot dog cart? Will the \nwomen who work for you accompany you? \n-Did you invite Michael to sit in on a presentation by a group of quants? Are you looking for a group of quants who have \ndeveloped promising investing algorithms, and do you plan to invest $5 million with each? \n-during U.N. Week in late September, did you host a Sunday night discussion with Bill Gates, Mort Zuckerman, and Peter Thiel? \nWas anyone else in attendance? Were you discussing a possible Gates Foundation donor advised fund? \n-Did you host Sheikh Hamad Bin Jassim and several others from Qatar? Do you know if the Sheikh has a home across the street \nfrom you in Manhattan? Did they talk to you about bribery compromising their bid for the World Cup? When was this? Did \nthey bring a gift of chocolate made with pistachios grown on the Sheikh's farm? \n-The morning after the Qataris came over, did you have a 9 AM breakfast with the attorney Reid Weingarten? Did you discuss \nhis defense of CT governor John Rowland, the Qatari visit, and who controls ISIS? Did Weingarten believe Turkey was using ISIS \nas a proxy against the Kurds? \n-After this, did you meet with Brock Pierce to discuss bitcoin? Did Larry Summers join this meeting? \n-That evening, did you host Australian PM Kevin Rudd and Thorborn Jagland for a cocktail party? Did Jagland critique US \nforeign policy? Did you offer to fly him back to Europe on your jet? \n-The following morning, did Ehud Barack come over for breakfast? Did he have an omelet? Did he defend both Putin and \nObama? \n-Was this followed by a senior White House official, whose name you don't want mentioned? \n-Did you then meet with Elisa New to discuss supporting a poetry series and other sources of funding? Did you forcefully \ncritique her proposed budget? \n-After meeting with New, did you meet with the following: Hardeep Purie, Kairat Kelimbetov, Nathan Myhrvold, Martin \nNowak, Richard Axel, Ron Baron, Josh Harris? Have you funded Nowak's program at Harvard with $30 million? \n-did Michael join a lunch at your home with Bill Richardson? \n-do you believe powerful people seek your advice because you're not affiliated with any institution, so you have no ulterior \nmotives when giving them advice? \n-is your Paris home a 10,000 sq ft apartment on Avenue Foch? Does it have a stuffed baby elephant in its living room? Is it \nmeant as a reminder that elephants have 23 copies of tumor suppressor genes? \n-Is the only book on your bedside table Lolita? Are you a fan of Nabokov? \n-Did you tell Michael that he should make a particular $100k investment in early September? What was it? \n-Were you born on 1953 in Coney Island? Was your father a Parks dept employee? Was your mother a housewife? \n-were you the captain of the math team at Lafayette High School? \n-did you study at Cooper Union for two years before beginning classes at NYU's Courant classes? After this, did you teach math \nat Dalton? Was this your first exposure to wealthy people? Did this teach you the rich had just as many problems as the \nworking class, only theirs were caused by too much money rather than too little? \n-Did Punch Sulzberger try to convince you to join the NYT from Dalton? Did you once drive with Sulzberger to his country \nestate in a wood paneled station wagon, while he talked on a phone to his chaffeur? \n-did you meet Ace Greenberg through his children at Dalton? \n-Did he say that given your reputation for intelligence and Jewish heritage, you should be working at Bear Stearns? Was this in \nthe late 70s? \n-Did you soon move to a penthouse at 66th St. and 2nd Avenue? \n-During this time did you regularly attend Studio 54? \n-Have you ever drank or taken drugs? \n-Do you believe that in the 50's, finance was governed by personal relationships, but in the 70's, with the rise of derivatives \ntrading, math began to dominate the field? \n-Did you never want to get married to maintain your freedom? \n-Did you become close to Jimmy Cayne? \n-Did you leave Bear Stearns in 1982? Why? Did you take clients including Marvin Davis and Herb Siegel? \n-Were you then dating Morgan Fairchild? \n-During the 80s, did you frequently go to England where you befriended Robin Reach and attended country shooting parties \nand black tie dinners? \n-Were you mainly interested in meeting smart people rather than amassing a personal fortune? \n-do you think that billionaire-level worth creates worries that millionaires don't face? Does traditional wealth management \nnot work for billionaires? \n-Did you help governments that came after corrupt dictators reclaim stolen assets? Which governments? \n-Did you begin advising and representing wealthy people and families regarding philanthropy during this period? \n-Did you advise Steven Hoffenberg? \n-Did you attend the 1994 Serpentine Gallery gala? Did you socialize with Princess Diana at that event? \n-Did you meet Bill Clinton after he left the White House? Did this change the arc of your life? \n-did you buy your Manhattan home from Les Wexner? \n-Did you meet with Larry Page and Sergey Brin during your 2002 trip to the TED conference? Did they describe a plan to market \nGoogle bras with the o's as cups? Did they believe Google was a good company name because men would be drawn to the oo? \n-Soon after this, did you have an assistant schedule a meeting with Michael for advice about the media as both Vanity Fair and \nNew York Magazine were profiling you? Did you also ask Graydon Carter for advice, expressing doubts about increased public \nprofile, to which Carter said you should have moved to a Queens 2 bedroom if you wanted to avoid publicity? \n-Have you had a daily massage for several years? When you got your daily massage in Palm Beach, did the masseuses often \ncome from parlors your termed \"Jack Shacks\" ? Did they sometimes have \"happy endings\" ? Would there be many different \nmasseuses, recommended by word of mouth? \n-After Palm Beach police started investigating you, did you ask Alan Dershowitz to come to Florida to provide you with legal \nhelp?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 31 2015 03:26 PM", "subject": "Fwd: fact checking questions for New York Magazine story", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027056.txt_8199
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027056.txt
subject: RE: FW: Tix for Jeffrey
messages:
  [{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:59:08 PM", "subject": "RE: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Forgot to ask you — pis have someone from your office confirm 2 tickets for LifeBall for you. \nAlso provide them with a name of the girl that you are talking. \nOne the pdf that I sent you there is a contact info and refer to the email below (Magdalena Schuster \nAnd she is holding them for you. \nPlease do it asap as these are hard to get."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 4:27 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "call me now 212 772 9416"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:21 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "It was not easy as people from LifeBall are very difficult. But I go it (they even now approved you - they \nneeded to do a background check believe it or not! — as on that dinner will be president of Austria, Clinton etc) \nfor two tickets — for you and your guest for a price that you do not need to buy a table (as they do not sell \nindividual seats). \nGuy below is a good friend and he is a CEO of amFAR (amFAR has a joined dinner) — so he helped. \nThe nice thing about these tickets is that they are the most VIP. It includes reception, dinner, gala and after all \nparty access. \nI have the same ones (through Bill). \nI also got two additional for you but it turns out that they are not the same level so I reached to Kevin for help. \nThe price is 2,500Euro per ticket (this is very reduced price as I think the regular one for this is 15K and it is \nhard to get it). They will need an email from someone from your office and name a your guest asap. \nThe plan for for Vienna I am sending you with my next email!\nBoris"}, {"sender": "Kevin Frost", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 6:39 AM", "subject": "Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Boris: \nHere is the information sheet for Jeffrey to buy tickets. Tell him to use my name and the name of Magdalena \nSchuster on the email below. They've already approved him to buy tickets to Lifeball and the Gala dinner \nwhich happens right before the ball. I hope you guys are all planning to attend the dinner as well. You can tell \nyour friend Jeffrey that he should buy the Mini car for me as a thank you. =) \nI'm getting in to Vienna on Friday afternoon. Let's get together on Friday night. \nSee you soon,"}, {"sender": "Magdalena Schuster", "recipients": ["Kevin Frost"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 03, 2012 1:04 PM", "subject": "AW: AW: NY plane", "body": "Hi Kevin, \nattached please find an information sheet about the AIDS Solidarity Gala — I am sure Jeffrey will very much \nenjoy the Gala. \nI've also included the auction items at the Gala for your and Jeffrey's information. \nLet me know how I can be of further assistance. \nAll the best, \nLena"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025655.txt_8213
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025655.txt
subject: Re: Search for next FBI director moves ahead quickly
messages:
  [{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 15, 2017 at 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Search for next FBI director moves ahead quickly", "body": "FYI - Alice Fisher stated to be in the mix of potential candidates for new FBI director."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "5/15/2017 5:47:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Search for next FBI director moves ahead quickly", "body": "i know"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025133.txt_8216
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025133.txt
subject:
  Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric

messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Your pal should stay out of press.\nPublic link to manafort will be a disaster.\nThis is a staggering shit show."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Summers"], "timestamp": "Friday, October 27, 2017 6:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "saudi?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Was there. Spoke well. Spent time w Softbank deputy Najeev or some such PIF guy too.\nFlying back.\nHow is life among the lucrative and louche?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:02 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "anyone stand out. . ? when we meet I will endeavor to mesmerize you with stories of\nD.C. so wild. !!!."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Softbank deputy guy i liked and seemed aware and honest re Son.\nLots of slathering to saudis. I yipped about inclusion.\nI observed that half the IQ In world was possessed by women without mentioning they are more than 51\npercent of population....\nMnuchin plumbs new depths.\nWar seems more likely than I used to think\nDjT is world s luckiest guy in terms of opposition, economy etc. still think his world will collapse.\nI'm trying to figure why American elite think if u murder your baby by beating and abandonment it must be\nirrelevant to your admission to Harvard, but hit on a few women 10 years ago and can't work at a network\nor think tank. DO NOT REPEAT THIS INSIGHT"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:46 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "evangelicals confirmed in their belief of a divine hand. I kid you not. their view. how else ,could one\nexplain DJT winning. To a person they never knew him."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Lot of ruin in a nation"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:52 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "what was the consensus of your fellow attendees at the saudi conference. He, Donald belives everything is\nhonky dorey. . especially after the flake concession. tax legislation, being put together by the\ncommittees. . all odd"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/27/2017 3:59:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Hard to tell.\nGeneral view Donald is a clown, increasingly dangerous on foreign policy."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026548.txt_8222
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026548.txt
subject: Fwd: Photos
messages:
  [{"sender": "Guy", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski", "Scott Stambaugh"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 7, 2014 12:16 pm", "subject": "Photos", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 7, 2014 12:45 pm", "subject": "Fwd: Photos", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nphotos of unmasked B727,. Paint shop indicated we can use Vinyl for your \"E\" Logo and \"Flag\" as oppose of painting. this would enable easy removal if plane sells in the future. Trump and other airlines uses Vinyl for logos,.\ncan you sketch the style of \"E\" for the tail, and I'll request rendering with slanted Flag for Right side of Vertical Stabilizer,.\n\nthank you,\nLarry"}, {"sender": "Lvje", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/7/2014 5:00:22 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Photos", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031146.txt_8236
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031146.txt
subject: J.P. Morgan Eye on the Market 2/27/2012: Dire Straits
messages:
  [{"sender": "us.gio@jpmorgan.com", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "2/27/2012 5:50:08 PM", "subject": "J.P. Morgan Eye on the Market 2/27/2012: Dire Straits", "body": "Eye on the Market, February 27, 2012 [the attached PDF is much easier to read this week, particularly if you are interested in the energy science implications of last week’s press release from the House Minority Leader]\n\nTopics: oil markets and Iran\n\nMost of this week’s note deals with oil prices and Iran, but I did want to point out a trend that is illustrative of how things are going globally.  One of the strongest aspects of the US recovery has been the rebound in business spending on equipment and software.  As highlighted by our friends at Hamiltonian Associates, sales by Caterpillar’s dealer network are a proxy for global trends.  Caterpillar’s US sales are leading the pack for the first time in a while, Asia is moderating, and Europe trails with a distinctly negative trend.  We expect a recovery in US payrolls this year, and eventually, in labor incomes.  The US recovery may be weak by historical standards, but expectations are pretty low (2.2% growth in 2012).  We expect the US to exceed expectations, and for Europe ex-Germany to disappoint them.  Absent a blow-up in Iran, this view seems like it’s on track.  \n\n“Iranium enrichment”: another hurdle for global markets to surmount\n\nThe near-term fundamentals don’t point to higher oil prices.  Oil demand has been revised down a bit, particularly in the OECD, and non-OPEC supply growth is a little higher in 2012 than in recent years.  After netting all the supply and demand factors, it looks like there will be a global oil inventory build in 2012 (see chart below), not something we would normally associate with rising oil prices.  However, even before we get to Iran, there are other factors contributing to higher prices: a pick-up in global growth expectations for 2013 and beyond; the explosion of Central Bank balance sheets and associated reflation goals (see last week’s EoTM); and the possibility that China’s will build strategic crude oil reserves to the IEA standard of 90 days from their current level of 14.  Note as well that the inventory build is a small one, nowhere near 2002-2007 levels.\n\nThat’s why Iran is a risk: a disruption would make oil markets even tighter, and drive gasoline prices up further.  Even before the February spike, gasoline prices relative to earnings and income were starting to bite (2nd chart).   The private sector can handle some gasoline price increases, but probably not much more than what we’ve seen already.  The spread between retail and wholesale gasoline prices is low ($0.35, compared to a $0.35-$1.00 range), suggesting further retail increases may be in store.\n\nPeople like me now spend a lot of time on conference calls with geopolitical experts of different stripes.  On one call, speakers raised the probability of military action from 30% to 50%.  On another call, speakers mentioned that the US has “run out of senior military advisors to send to Israel, all requesting that Israel not attack unilaterally”, and believe Israel won’t.  A paper by Matt Kroenig in Foreign Affairs magazine entitled “Time to Attack Iran; Why a Strike is the Least Bad Option” resulted in a firestorm of criticism from multiple sides.  With sanctions appearing to work (Iran’s inflation, currency collapse, fewer buyers of its oil and a potential ban on Iranian banks from the global SWIFT payments network), won’t the US want to wait and see?  Most of the US military establishment seems to take this view.  The conjecture is endless.  Here are a few points I found to be of greatest relevance as we sift through this:\n\n** The US and Europe appear to take the Israeli attack threat seriously.  Economic recoveries are just beginning to form in both regions, and there are elections coming up, so for politicians to ratchet up sanctions and drive up oil and gasoline prices, they must be very concerned that without tougher sanctions, the Israelis might act.\n\n** Iran’s Fordow facility is key to understanding the debate about the effectiveness of military action, and why some are nervous that the “window for action is closing”.  Fordow is estimated to be 80-90 meters below grade, and is suspected of being ready for uranium enrichment.  The Iranians reportedly have ~80 kg of 20% enriched uranium (UF6), and need 25 kg more to convert it into enough uranium metal (UF4) for a nuclear bomb.  The most powerful conventional weapon in the US arsenal is the Massive Ordnance Penetration device (MOP), a 30,000 pound bomb with 5,000 pounds of explosives.  It travels at twice the speed of sound, and is designed to penetrate rock and concrete before detonating.  However, it would probably take 4 of these weapons, dropped in succession by B-2 bombers in the same exact spot, to destroy Fordow [a].\n\n** Military strikes could quickly escalate to engulf the entire region.  While the Israel-Iran and US-Iran dimensions are important to understand, so too are the Sunni-Shia issues in play.  Any complicity by Sunni countries in conjunction with US action (airspace, attack plans and logistics, etc.) might be seen as acts of war by Iran. \n\n** The Strait of Hormuz carries 20% of the world’s oil (17 million bpd).  There are active and de-activated pipelines in Saudi Arabia, Iraq and the UAE that could divert around 5-6 mm bpd, and strategic petroleum reserves could be released.  Even so, a military battle in the Strait could cause oil prices to rise $20-$30, according to EIA and GAO 2007 estimates.\n\nTo be fair to all the analysts, journalists and think tanks, there is no reason to expect greater foresight now than during the Cuban Missile Crisis, Iraq War or other military standoffs. This is a binary market risk that in our view justifies material consideration in portfolio allocations, and that’s about all we know.  Our 2012 Outlook section on this issue was entitled “Learning to Live with a Nuclear Iran”, and that may very well be where this ends up.\n\nAs a reminder, since 2001, rising oil prices have coincided with a gradual exhaustion of conventional oil to meet marginal demand, sharp increases in operating and commodity input costs for oil companies, deeper exploratory and developmental wells, reliance on a shrinking number of deepwater fields, rising E&P spending by US oil majors to meet rising EM demand, etc.   A simplified version of this dynamic appears below: as oil production rises to meet global demand, the sources for the marginal barrel become more expensive and more complicated.  Without getting into the whole Peak Oil thing, I do think there is evidence that the marginal cost of oil will be a speed bump on growth in the years ahead, if oil production has to rise over 90 million barrels per day to support demand and the building of strategic reserves.\n\nOutput from the Congressional Centrifuge\n\nIn the midst of all the above, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi issued the following press release: \n\n“Independent reports confirm that speculators are driving up the cost of oil, hurting consumers and potentially damaging the economic recovery. Wall Street profiteering, not oil shortages, is the cause of the price spike.  In fact, U.S. oil production is at its highest level since 2003, and millions of acres have been cleared for additional development.   We need to take strong action to protect consumers from this speculation.  Unfortunately, Republicans have chosen to protect the interests of Wall Street speculators and oil companies instead of the interests of working Americans by obstructing the agencies with the responsibility of enforcing consumer protection laws.  They have also repeatedly opposed our efforts to end billions of dollars in outdated taxpayer subsidies for oil companies enjoying record profits.\n\nWe support efforts by the Obama Administration to expand domestic energy resources, including natural gas and renewable sources like wind and solar that create jobs in America and will end our dangerous dependence on foreign energy supplies.  This can be achieved because today, the United States currently has more oil and gas rigs at work than the rest of the world combined, and imports of foreign oil have decreased.\n\nWe call on the Republican leadership to act on behalf of American consumers and join our efforts to crack down on speculators who care more about their profits than the price at the pump even if these spikes harm the American consumer and our economy.”\n\nI am of course not going to comment directly on this, for many reasons, including not wanting to spend my days at California’s solar-powered detention facility in Chuckawalla Valley.  However, for anyone interested in the specific points raised in this press release, I have included some charts on the unfortunately binding constraints of science and energy economics.  Enjoy.\n\n5. Now let’s get to the interesting part. The press release implies that natural gas and renewable energy can reduce American dependence on foreign oil (“end” is the word used). This is an appealing proposition, particularly with Brent oil prices now 5 times higher than natural gas prices on a BTU basis. So, let’s assume that the US wanted to cease all oil imports from Venezuela, Russia and the Persian Gulf. This would reduce oil imports by ~30%. If Americans still wanted to drive around just as much, absent an increase of 2.8 million bpd in US domestic crude production, electricity would have to replace the foregone gasoline.  Ergo: how much wind power or natural gas would be needed, assuming electric cars at 200 watt hours per km? And what policies would be needed on fracking, eminent domain, and subsidies for high voltage direct current power lines to transmit electricity at acceptable loss rates?\n\nNote: the charts below only account for the foregone gasoline component of the imported crude oil. Gasoline is only around 45%-50% of total refined products. The US would also have to come up with suitable domestic or foreign replacements for the rest of the barrel: jet fuel, heating oil, fuel oil, lube oils, asphalt, etc. This is a topic that is often neglected in discussions about reducing reliance on foreign oil: we do a lot more with it than just drive cars.\n\nMichael Cembalest\n\nChief Investment Officer"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029978.txt_8245
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029978.txt
subject: Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 15 2016 03:40 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "How did they get access to this and how is it legal that they are posting this?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030516.txt_8252
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030516.txt
subject: Fwd: Fwd: FW: Please forward
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kirsty Mackenzie", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 11:11 AM", "subject": "RE: Please forward", "body": "I am writing in an attempt to make contact with Jeffrey Epstein and wondered if you would, as his attorney, forward this message on to him? \nWe are keen to explore the possibility of conducting an interview with Mr Epstein, on the subject of the stories which are circulating, however inaccurately, about both him and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York; we'd be keen to hear from Mr Epstein first hand so that the various and at times, speculative reporting which is at large in the UK press can be better scrutinised? \nLet me tell you a bit about the Today programme. \nToday is the BBC's main morning news show; we have been part of the BBC for over 50 years and are generally considered one of the most important news broadcast outlets - either on radio or TV - here in the UK. We set the news agenda for the BBC and in many respects we set the daily news agenda for the country. Our interviews are regularly re broadcast across the BBC's national and international news network including - BBC World, BBC World Service and BBC Online. The combination of these outlets means the global 'reach of a BBC Today programme interview is second to none. \nProgramme guests have included a selection of some of the biggest names in politics, business, international relations and the arts including US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, President Nicholas Sarkozy, President Hamid Karzai, HRH the Prince of Wales, former President Musharraf, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former President Bill Clinton, Senator George Mitchell, Al Gore, Kofi Annan, former Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Dalai Lama, Bill Gates, George Soros, Stephen Hawking, Sir Paul McCartney, Mick Jaggar and Salman Rushdie. \nWe are a programme that carries considerable weight and influence and which prides itself in being a first port of call for many of the most important and influential figures on the international stage. \nI can best be reached via my cell phone - - or this email address. \nMy very best wishes and my thanks!\nKirsty"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Mandelson BT"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 05:01 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Peter Mandelson <peter@mandelson.com>", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:16 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": "No !!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "3/7/2011 5:26:02 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032571.txt_8259
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032571.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well . congragulations"}, {"sender": "{i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf .. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 10:24:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i dont know yet .. larson should reply to me soon .. i will let you know as soon as he reply. are you in new york\nafter paris?\ni hope he reply soon as 1 want to catch my old man while he is there"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032565.txt_8262
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032565.txt
subject: Re: I look forward to hearing from you
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Stanley Rosenberg"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 25, 2017 3:22 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "Private Donor Helps Fund Scientists After\nTrump's Proposed “Anti-Science” Budget\nCuts\n\nwww.huffingtonpost.com\n\nThe famous American Astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson,\nonce said, “The good thing about science is that it's true,\nwhether or not you believe in ..."}, {"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "8/25/2017 6:56:49 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "What nice coverage in the Huffington Post.\n\nLiving in Europe, I was not aware that Trump's proposed cuts will be so devastating to the scientific\ncommunity.\n\nYou asked me if I would be in New York September 18. Did you have something in mind?\n\nI am 77 and do not travel so well. I have cut back on my plans to travel. I can consider coming to New York,\nSeptember has anything to do specifically with the vagus nerve - and if it cannot be done with a conference\ncall on Skype.\n\nI will be able to stop in NYC on a future trip.\n\nLinda Stone was the person who I met with years ago. It was Linda who suggested that I contact you.\n\nbest wishes,\n\nStanley"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026360.txt_8264
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026360.txt
subject: Digital Currency Initiative
messages:
  [{"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 25, 2015 at 10:25:09 AM EDT", "subject": "Digital Currency Initiative", "body": "As Bitcoin and Digital Currencies have started to become an important trend, the Media Lab has launched an initiative in the space. \n\nI wrote a blog post on why I think Blockchain/Bitcoin are like the Internet: \nhttp://joi.ito.com/weblog/2015/01/23/why-bitcoin-is-.html  \n\nThe way that Bitcoin is organized currently is that there are five core developers and around a hundred contributors to the core code. The five core developers are like Linus Torvalds of Linux. They decide what changes are made to the core code. One of the five is the lead developer, Wladimir, and one is the Chief Scientist, Gavin. \n\nGavin, Wladimir and Cory (an important contributing developer) were being paid out of a non-profit organization called the Bitcoin Foundation. A few weeks ago, it \"blew up\" when one of the board members declared the foundation \"bankrupt\". ( https://bitcoinfoundation.org/forum/index.php?/topic/1284-the-truth-about-the-bitcoin-foundation/ ) Many organizations scrambled to step into the vacuum created by the foundation and \"take control\" of the developers. We moved quickly talking to all of the various stakeholders and the three developers decided to join the Media Lab. This is a big win for us. \n\nAccording to the WSJ Blog: \nhttp://blogs.wsj .com/moneyb eat/2015/04/24/bitb eat-tackling-bitcoin-pric e-swings-with-eye-on-emerging-markets/  \n\n>> It's official, more or less: MIT's famed Media Lab has become the principal home and funding source for the small team of developers responsible for maintaining and improving bitcoin's core software. \n>> \n>> Gavin Andresen, who bears the title of Chief Scientist for the six-person core development team, announced on his blog Wednesday that he and two other core developers, Wladimir van der Laan and Cory Fields, had moved to the MIT Media Lab's new Digital Currency Initiative, ending their previous status as  employees of the Bitcoin Foundation. The three other core developers, who draw salaries from different employers, will continue in that status. \n\nThe usually rather feisty community has been overall very supportive and I think it is because of our strong research focus and our neutral position. \n\nThe initiative has strong support from faculty across campus including crypto guru Ron Rivest and former Chief Economist of the IMF, Simon Johnson as well as faculty at the Media Lab, Sandy Pentland and Andy Lippman. \n\nMore about initiative here: \n\nhttp://joi.ito.com/weblog/2015/04/15/announcing-mit-dci.html  \nhttps://medium.com/@medialab/launching-a-digital-currency-initiative-238fc678aba2  \n\nI hired one of Megan's former colleagues from the White House, Brian Forde who was in charge of figuring out Bitcoin at the White House and brief the POTUS on Bitcoin to run the initiative and he is doing an amazing job so far. \n\nhttps://newsoffice.mit. edu/2015/brian-forde-media-lab-director-digital-currency-0415  \n\nFred and Reid on the Advisory Council have been super helpful in helping us navigate this. Advisory Council member Jim Pallotta is also active in this space and joined our first and very successful dinner with Media Lab Member (sponsor) companies to kick off a special interest group for our companies. \n\nI am in discussions with Stanford, Princeton and Hong Kong UST to create an academic network for research. We are also participating in a policy network with Stanford, Harvard and Oxford. \n\nHappy to follow with more information for anyone interested in learning more or getting involved."}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 10:57 AM", "subject": "Digital Currency Initiative", "body": "FYI\nUsed gift funds to underwrite this which allowed us to move quickly and win this round. Thanks."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "4/25/2015 5:06:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Digital Currency Initiative", "body": "gavin is clever"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030502.txt_8269
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030502.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but i am already getting sick of so many meetings!\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has some questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "No problem.\nI am meeting him as he has some questions. I do not need anything from him.\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 5:34 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Thank you!\nI heard that he is not that fun but i trust your judgement. It would be blast that you are here. I was just flirting with 22 years old hot blond blue eyes mexican chick. It turns out she is with her husband. Did not have chance to check him out. But as we concluded, anything good is rented;)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "hes great fun"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Just had mtg with Andrew. He is great.\nJee - i think that i would trade davos for a good fashion week. Much more fun."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 02:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "i understand the ratio of run to leap is way too high"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032813.txt_8270
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032813.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/3/2018 1:58:44 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Reading the nytimes trump tax story...so wish I was with you right now...so where are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 25, 2018 11:42 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "where?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026406.txt_8274
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026406.txt
subject: Re: Mechanisms for learning
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joscha Bach"], "timestamp": "7/24/2016 5:43:22 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "you need workers as well as thinkers, you are focused on the individual. . focus on the group. . . you NEED distributions."}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 1:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Average humans are probably not fully able to learn how to program etc. Fraction of people that reshape the world are at the right end of the Bell curves, so difference in variation means fewer women. We tend to be more interested in the outliers. Have people explicitly evolved to be not to be too smart on average, or is general intelligence so hard to get from human brains?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "24.07.2016 um 00:20", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "the average is the only thing that matters"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "23.07.2016 um 04:41", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Cells seem to be mostly indistinguishable (except for XX), I thought? Size is different on average, but males with small brains are still male.\ngender differenece. unlikely motivational, every cell is different. size is didfferent. . the more radical idea is that brains are the nucleus of the human\" cell: the body the membrane, . the organizm the colletcions and interactions of brains, wisdom of crowds . mirroring. etc. . money used as signals. as is spoken language. . what does social behavior mean, it is the cooridiation of indiv brains. =\nI think that mathematics based thinking does not allow for censorship. money people concepts if they are all math , then poliiical correctness and their structures are only subsets of a larger group of thoughts. its not emotinal for me. most people have censorship built in at a deep level, social reasoning gets to different results than equivalent abstract reasoning"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 6:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Variation of all traits is higher for males, so there are more high IQ men (wider bell-curve). Given average brain size difference, the small difference in average IQ is surprising, I think"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time:\nno worry, if i understand correctly you are suggsting there are layers 1 through N. lets cal them L 1 - Ln. there are times T 1- Tn / and then conjecture that changing the time . correlations ( by genetic swtch or other method. , you might be able to make blacks smarter by changing the time for motor layer development and changing the time for other layers. . ). like telemeres for the cell , are their equivalents for the layers. . as you talked about culling the unused neurons in each layer, each neuron in each layer would get dfferent ( kill yourself if you are not being used instructions ).\nand CONCEPTS could be layer to layer communicaiton. . are gender differences also a matter of time, and structure of interactions. .\nre taboo , maybe climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation. fire. potentailly a good thing for the species . the earths forest too many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense is the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if the brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent\ni my self believe that african music, westrn music , chinese music are a window into the the structure of those layers. . western rigid, african primitve , chinese nature based, . I belive that synphoic movments best describe your layering, they open with a basic simple melody„ after it is learned, it is repeated and \" developed\" , inverted, distorted, related, etc. the development stage take a long time. then there is a recapitlaltion of the whole. and its inter and intra actions. . african musci has lots of beats. and little development. - no accident, it mirrors their learning process."}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\nthank you for your support and encouragement, even where I fail.\nSorry for being such an embarrassment today. I will spell out today's argument a bit better and cohesive when I get to it. Also, I should have recognized that the main point I tried to make would trigger Noam (who was as always very generous, patient, kind and humble on the personal level, even though he did not feel like conceding anything on the conceptual one)."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030874.txt_8276
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030874.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "eC", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/12/2017 6:36:24 PM", "subject": null, "body": "OMG!!! Columbia university is so political involved and has such a strong feminists influence — !!!\nToday we judged Clinton about scandal with Monica Lewinsky, judged Hillary that she hasn't left him,\n\nand judged Vladimir Putin ...we actually mention him every day.."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021538.txt_8278
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021538.txt
subject: Re:, 31E-MM-108062, 03/27/2008
messages:
  [{"sender": "New York", "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": "03/27/2008", "subject": "Re:, 31E-MM-108062, 03/27/2008", "body": "The NYO considers this lead covered. However, given the fact that there is the possibility that other minors are involved in the NY territory, investigation continues in this matter."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022660.txt_8279
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022660.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "______________________. the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story, is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, \" he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never, it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/9/2015 6:33:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday explaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs, transferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back here as \"reported fact.\" Problem with story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and unlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they might. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are public people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk tomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033492.txt_8285
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033492.txt
subject: Fwd: Photos
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lvjet &lt; [email protected]&gt;", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 7, 2014 12:45 pm", "subject": "Fwd: Photos", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nphotos of unmasked B727. Paint shop indicated we can use Vinyl for your \"E\" Logo and \"Flag\" as oppose of painting. this would enable easy removal if plane sells in the future. Trump and other airlines uses Vinyl for logos.\n\ncan you sketch the style of \"E\" for the tail, and I'll request rendering with slanted Flag for Right side of Vertical Stabilizer.\n\nthank you,\nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032344.txt_8288
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032344.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:54 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You called it! How are you positioned re market?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "long dow , short yen euro and pound. long reits,"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:10:27 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "who is treasury secretary? Is Mnuchin a done deal? Seems too obvious."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032252.txt_8296
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032252.txt
subject: Re: bad
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 30, 2016, at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re: bad", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/31/us/politics/donald-trump-abortion.html?ribbon-ad-idx=3&rref=homepage&module=Ribbon&version=origin&region=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Home%20Page&pgtype=article"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/31/2016 8:27:13 AM", "subject": "Re: bad", "body": "Agreed. Trump appears to be losing momentum in polls even before that crazy comment. Think it may be beginning of the end of him...\n\nhttp://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031983.txt_8303
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031983.txt
subject: Re: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz [jay@lefkowitz.com]", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031997.txt_8312
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031997.txt
subject: High Profile
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jamie Rosenwald", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:12 PM", "subject": "High Profile", "body": "congratulate you on your wonderful financial successes since your days as\nmy Physics prof at Dalton!! The young, bright options trader, who\nunderstood Black Sholes and how to use it, at Bear, made good! !\n\nUnless your PR advisor is Donald Trump, I am not sure that current press\nprovides you with much benefit. Perhaps I am wrong? Not the first time! !\n\nAnyway, middle age has brought its own unique set of challenges. Aging\ncertainly ain’t for sissys.\n\nRegards,\nJamie Rosenwald\n\nPs. David Asch and I toasted to you during our Thanksgiving weekend in\nAmagansett in November."}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 5, 2015", "subject": "High Profile", "body": "thanks, what is david doing?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032436.txt_8321
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032436.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "V-BR Alireza ITTIHADIEH", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/15/2017 1:49:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "People are just back and the activity really started this week. A lot of enquiries out of China and a lot of buyers in the US have resurfaced"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "15 Jan 2017, at 04:17", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is trading , now that trump has won. ?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029549.txt_8322
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029549.txt
subject: Re: boosting strategy
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 7, 2014, at 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "About 4,880,000 results (0.33 seconds) different computer, not good\nSearch Results\n\n1. Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia\nen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey Epstein\n\nWikipedia\n\nJeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953) is an American financier and science and education\nphilanthropist. He worked at Bear Stearns early in his ...\n\nLife - Financial career - Science funding - Solicitation of prostitution\n2. Jeffrey Epstein: International Moneyman of Myster\n\nnymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/\nNew York Magazine"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 7, 2014, at 8:32 PM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Understand the two negatives are still present. We are still on track per our last call of 60 days from 1/10 if we\ncan get the placement out next week Christina is preparing for us and results continue to respond as they have\nbeen.\n\nIt takes 30 days for Google to respond in most cases and we ramped up 28 days ago with boosting alternate\nURLs per our call\n\nWe are working very hard to make this happen and should have Christina set up to support us with columns on\na few top sites at no cost moving forward\n\nlam available for a call now or this weekend to review."}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "2/8/2014 2:07:34 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Almost finished with a batch of content as well as a press release--you'll have it over the weekend.\n\nAlso the PED set up a page called 'Friends' which is where they'll place jeffrey. I'll send you the URL when\ndone.\n\nTyler, could you check google highlighter?\nThank you,"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032246.txt_8323
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032246.txt
subject: Re: Patterson
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about:\n\nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience.\n\nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is about your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and perhaps some social media efforts.\n\nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and interests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive effort.\n\nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and Connolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that Patterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered before.\n\nMeanwhile--"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 18, 2016, at 11:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmeler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 3:57:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030927.txt_8324
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030927.txt
subject: Sam Fields on 302 Interview
messages:
  [{"sender": "Grant J. Smith", "recipients": ["Ken Jenne", "Grant J. Smith"], "timestamp": "Oct 12, 2009 15:48:27", "subject": "Sam Fields on 302 Interview", "body": "Broward Probe: 302 Reasons Not To Talk To The FBI\nBY SAM FIELDS\nGuest Columnist\nActually, there are not 302 reasons. There is but one and it is called in federal court \"The 302\". It could screw the innocent and the unwary.\nThe newspapers and Browardbeat.com make clear that the Federal investigations that led to the arrests of County Commissioner Josephus Eggleston, former Miramar Commissioner Fitzroy Salesman and School Board member Bev Gallagher are just beginning.\nThe FBI will be interviewing everyone from County Administrator Bertha Henry to bus drivers about anything and everything.\nThey are looking for scalps.\nI suspect that if the average person thought about it, he would assume that when the FBI comes calling, like Joe Friday from DRAGNET, they \"want the facts and nothing but the facts.\" Equally important they want an accurate record of that interview so they bring a court reporter or at the very least a tape recorder.\nThe average person would be wrong.\nAgents bring a pencil and pad to take notes. They then prepare a summary of the interview called a \"302 Report.\"\nIf you are called as a witness at trial, prior to testifying, you will be given a copy of \"Your 302\" to review. It is a record of what the FBI insists you said at your previous meeting.\nIf your interview lasted more than thirty seconds, it is guaranteed you will find numerous discrepancies. Some of them will be insignificant; some of them could be material.\nAsk two people to listen to you in a discussion about a traffic accident and then write a summary. It is a guaranteed they will have differences with each other as well as with you, the witness.\nYou said, \"I am reasonably sure that the traffic light was green\".\nOne report takes out the equivocation and quotes you as saying: \"The light was green.\"\nThis brings us to Federal law 18 USC 1001. That statute makes it a felony to lie to the government. And guess who decides whether or not you were lying? The government.\nSo here is your conundrum. Do you testify about your doubts about the light, which is the truth, or do you adopt the \"302\" version to avoid the wrath of the FBI?\nWhether or not the \"302\" discrepancies are a result of stupidity or cupidity makes no difference.\nTestify in opposition to the \"302\" and you are in the crosshairs of the Feds.\nIf they believe your testimony cost them the case, the next thing you likely to hear from the FBI will be: \"Please place your hands behind your back.\"\nA number of years ago, fed up with the 302 Two Step, I turned the tables on them.\nIn a high profile case, my client was asked to submit to an FBI interview at their offices in North Miami Beach.\nFeigning naivety, I asked where the court reporter was. I was told there was no court reporter.\nI then asked where the tape recorder was.\nI will always be impressed that the agent was able to give us the response he did without laughing. He said the FBI could not tape the interview because they did not have \"enough money in their budget.\"\nIt was time to play the Trump Card.\nAt that point, I removed a cassette recorder from my pocket and explained that my client had been able to scrape together the 59 cents for a cassette tape. Further we would pay for the tape to be transcribed and supply them with a free copy of everything.\nYou could've heard a fart in a vacuum.\nThey now made it clear that no way, no how would any FBI interview be recorded. So we went forward with the interview as the agent took notes.\nMonths later the client was called to testify at trial.\nI warned him the \"302\" would be a work of fiction. It was. I was sitting in the back of the courtroom.\nCalled to the stand, he told the \"real\" truth and not the \"302\" version of the truth. The Assistant U.S. Attorney was frustrated and kept on confronting him with the \"302\" version.\nFed up with the prosecutor and in the presence of the jury, the witness preceded to recount my debate over recording from the first interview. Pointing to me in the back of the courtroom, the witness announced that I had warned him that they would pull this crap with the \"302\" report.\nIt didn't take the jury very long to acquit.\nWith the advent of DNA and groups like the Innocence Project, we have now seen that so-called unrecorded confessions have put many innocent people in jail and even on Death Row. As a result, agencies such as the BSO, now require all interviews to be taped.\nBut not the FBI.\nLike anyone, including lawyers, the FBI wants to control the record of the interview. Taping hurts that effort.\nI'm not saying that it is FBI policy to step over the line. But they have chalk on their shoes more often than you can imagine.\nSo, what's should you do if the FBI comes calling?\nFirst of all, the advice I am about to give is not for the a guy who was an inadvertent witness to a bank robbery.\nI am talking about people who are being interviewed as part of the types of crimes that are best described as corruption, RICO, white collar, etc.\nThose are the kinds of cases that involve tons of evidence. Giving an innocent, but incorrect answer to a vague question could leave any of us in deep CaCa.\nA case in point is the lead story in the September 26, 2009 Herald. Chris Walton, director of the Broward County Transportation Department, was interviewed by two FBI agents.\nHe stated that they wanted to know if \"commissioners attempted to influence contracts.\"\n\"I told them no.\"\nIt may sound like a simple straight forward Q-and-A but it ain't necessarily so. He may think his interview and public statement ends the matter.\nIn actuality, he has thrown down the gauntlet in front of the FBI.\nStart out with the understanding that the FBI is not investigating to see if there is crime and corruption in Broward County government. They already believe there is. They are only trying to uncover evidence to confirm their beliefs.\nWalton's blanket defense of the Commission has made the Feds conclude he is a fool or co-conspirator.\nThe FBI just needs the evidence and not much of it. To quote the late Supreme Court Justice William Brennan: \"any prosecutor worth his salt could indict a ham sandwich.\"\nThis means all evidence, regardless of its ambiguous nature, will be interpreted to support their assumption of wrongdoing.\nThey will be using software to go through millions of E-mail messages to look for key words. As Buddy has quoted me: \"The 'E' in E-mail stands for evidence.\"\nSo imagine the following scenario.\nSix months from now they uncover an E-mail from the County Manager to Walton stating that Commissioner X wants to know if the bid of company Y for new busses was correctly filled out. He replies that it was.\nMonths later he has totally forgotten about the innocuous E-mail. Based on the merits, he happens to rank Y's bid number one.\nYou can bet as sure as J. Edgar Hoover wore pink poodle skirts, the FBI will conclude this was code from Commissioner X to Walton to vote for Y.\nArmed with the E-mail you can be damn sure that the G-Men will be back threatening him with everything including a stint in Gitmo.\nAll of this might have been avoided if he had followed my three basic rules.\nMemorize them.\n1. Do not talk to the FBI without a lawyer.\n2. Do not talk to the FBI without a lawyer.\n3. Do not talk to the FBI without a lawyer."}, {"sender": "Ken Jenne", "recipients": ["Grant J. Smith"], "timestamp": "Oct 12, 2009 17:44:42", "subject": "RE: Sam Fields on 302 Interview", "body": "FDLE is even worst."}, {"sender": "Grant J. Smith", "recipients": ["Robert C. Buschel"], "timestamp": "Oct 13, 2009 08:07:09", "subject": "Sam Fields on 302 Interview", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032350.txt_8326
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032350.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 5:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:14:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Did she also drop civil case against you ?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033486.txt_8330
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033486.txt
subject: B727
messages:
  [{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Rich Kahn", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "5/27/2011 4:34:44 PM", "subject": "B727", "body": "Trump's B727 sold for 2.7M,.\nSean very discussed with me this company was interested, unless he call you,.\n\nFrom Sean:\n\nThis buyer did have specs on your aircraft. They were looking at a 3.0 million budget but did not make\nan offer and it was too low. we did discuss it"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032940.txt_8331
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032940.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "12/2/2016 11:38:14 AM", "subject": null, "body": "first you father was afraid of trump and the us. , now he shold probaby move here. :)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032798.txt_8333
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032798.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "avenatti civil suit now goes front and center? I guess trump just refuses ? how are you feeling?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [a", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Quite a day...have a feeling cohen is just beginning to make trouble...where are you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "david pecker ? what happends to him"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [a", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/22/2018 3:30:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you have 5 minutes today? You could actually help me on something | think...(mizrahi bank wants to hire me)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029207.txt_8335
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029207.txt
subject: Re: deception
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ed Boyden"], "timestamp": "7/14/2014 9:45:41 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "definitely"}, {"sender": "Ed Boyden", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:50 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Sorry again for that last minute cancellation in the Spring -- alas,\nthe perils of running a new center, that I no longer control my\nschedule like in the good old days. But the Obama BRAIN Initiative is\nrunning strong, and MIT has a good bid for a seat at the table, so\nthat is good. Want to revisit a time for a chat? My schedule is now\nmuch more free, thanks to these BRAIN initiative activities\nlaunching..."}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:08 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Good morning Neil...I am afraid Jeffrey must cancel his trip up today...he is sick in bed and not well. I am\nso very sorry to do this last minute. Hopefully we can circle back to this soon.\n\nThank you,\nLesley\nAssistant to Jeffrey Epstein"}, {"sender": "Neil Gershenfeld", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2013, at 12:32 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Confirming lunch noon Friday at my office, E15-401. Sunglasses and beach balls optional, hopefully this\nwill be a warm-up for meeting in more entertaining venues.\n\nNeil"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032378.txt_8336
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032378.txt
subject: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "11/25/2016 10:28:28 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "Trump is still scheduled to depart Sunday between 4 and 6pm„ \nLet me know if we are firm for wheels up Saturday at 6pm still? \nThx \nLarry"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033066.txt_8339
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033066.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I didn't offer him a time yet . As I need my marching orders;)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just his plan. Trump is going to go down--why doesn't use this opportunity to strike out on his own? Also, \ngently imply I have tapes. I wonder, btw, if he isn't interested in talking to you about in fact bringing down \nTrump. Can't wait to hear?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 5:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Up?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes On conference finish in 10 min"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 11:27:44 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "The rich and powerful ALWAYS send lawyers letters . A book about any one of them takes more time to \npublish as I must be -and I am , meticulous about documentation and back up"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032968.txt_8340
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032968.txt
subject: Re: TR: update
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 11:37:26 AM", "subject": "Re: TR: update", "body": "Sent from my iPhone\nBegin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 14, 2017 at 8:18:41 PM EST", "subject": "TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\n\nLatest from JE (indeed, encouraging)\n\nPlease let me know when account/wire are active, and how I can access internet banking and start the ball (in\nfact, it has started)\n\nall the best"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 février 2017 18:40", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\n\nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number I should reach."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029575.txt_8357
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029575.txt
subject: Re: invitation
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New [lisnew@fas.harvard.edu]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed.\n\nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to\nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next\ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar\nthemes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young\ngirl.\n\nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \"bootleg\"\nepisode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me and you\nwere so kind to make it happen.\n\nLisa"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "count how many times you say I or me?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 8:06 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "okay....let me revise with I and me in mind before I talk to you.\nCan I call you tomorrow am?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "11/26/2018 2:40:00 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Yes"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031773.txt_8360
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031773.txt
subject: The New York Times: Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/22/2019 10:56:44 PM", "subject": "The New York Times: Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business", "body": "Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business\nThe New York Times\n\nPresident Trump’s former lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, discussed possible irregularities at the Trump\nOrganization. He wants a reduced prison sentence. Read the full story\n\nShared from Apple News"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029213.txt_8367
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029213.txt
subject: Re: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "train? yes ,1 will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" welll -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler [kathyruemmler@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course not , he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "9/19/2014 7:48:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "ae : you have a chance"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029279.txt_8372
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029279.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 9:53:43 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032387.txt_8373
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032387.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "first you father was afraid of trump and the us. , now he shold probaby move here. :)"}, {"sender": "Lang, Caroline", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/2/2016 12:41:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Excellent !"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023032.txt_8378
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023032.txt
subject: Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
messages:
  [{"sender": "Awitheridge@aol.com", "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers are or\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\n1. [redacted] says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was aged 15. Ms Maxwell led [redacted] upstairs on her first visit to him at his Palm Beach house. Mr Epstein was naked on massage table.\n\nMs Maxwell initiated a bisexual encounter during which Ms Maxwell rubbed her own breasts on Mr Epstein and directed [redacted] to copy her.\n\nPlease respond to these allegations and all others in the original Jane Doe 102 complaint.\n\n2. Ms Maxwell took part in numerous other sexual encounters involving her assistant [redacted] and Mr Epstein.\n\n3. Ms Maxwell kept sex toys and costumes in the Palm Beach mansion and dressed prior to sex sessions with Mr Epstein. S Maxwell herself wore black vinyl during sex sessions with Mr Epstein.\n\n4. [redacted] was paid between US $200 and $ 5000 US sex, depending on whether it involved travel and other men.\n\n5. [redacted] was required to have sex with friends of Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein, including Glenn Dubin, Les Wexner, Ehud Barak, former Senator George Mitchell and Stephen Kosslyn.\n\n6. Ms Maxwell introduce[redacted] to Prince Andrew in 2001 at Ms Maxwell's London house where [redacted] had sex with him. [redacted] subsequently was directed to meet him at Mr Epstein's New York house where Ms Maxwell directed [redacted] to sit on Andrew's knee with Johanna Sjoberg. Andrew groped both girls. Ms Maxwell directed [redacted] after this to have sex with Andrew.\n\nMs Maxwell and Mr Epstein subsequently travelled with [redacted] to Little St James where she was directed to stage an orgy for Andrew and Mr Epstein during which she performed oral sex on them.\n\n7. [redacted] was paid extra by Mr Epstein or his employees for these sexual encounters.\n\n8. Ms Maxwell knew [redacted] age and laughed about it when she introduced her to Andrew.\n\n9. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein tried to persuade [redacted] to bear his child.\n\n10. After sexual encounters with male friends of Mr Epstein and/or Ms Maxwell, Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein would ask explicit questions about what went on.\n\n11. Mr Epstein's residences in Florida and New York had surveillance cameras that taped the sex sessions and taped [redacted] even in the bathroom.\n\n12. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein arranged for Ehud Barak to have sex with several girls, often at Mr Epstein's Palm Beach house.\n\n13. Ms Maxwell piloted President Bill Clinton in a helicopter to a dinner on Little St James where two bruncttcs Ms Maxwell, and Mr Epstein were at the table.\n\n14. Mr Epstein bought Ms Maxwell the helicopter, homes in New York and London and a Mercedes."}, {"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmaxl@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": "GMAX <gmaxl@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["The Duke"], "timestamp": "Fri Mar 04 16:31:26 2011", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "The Duke", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 04:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "What? I don't know any of this. How are you responding?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032997.txt_8383
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032997.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:19:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "careful she is nottrustworthy at ALLL\n\nIam seein a little bit I don't think it will turn into romance I am a bit old and not tall enough but she\nseems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship\nCommison it came through Woody and [EEE because she bundled best Jonathan"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030486.txt_8390
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030486.txt
subject: this is the type of crazy frank rich nytimes that screams be careful
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley", "IEE: PETER MANDELSON"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 24 2010 02:57 PM", "subject": "this is the type of crazy frank rich nytimes that screams be careful", "body": "Kennedy didn’t settle for the generic populist rhetoric of Obama’s latest threats to “fight” unspecified bankers some indeterminate day. He instead took the strong action of dressing down U.S. Steel by name. As Richard Reeves writes in his book “President Kennedy,” reporters were left “literally gasping.” The young president called out big steel for threatening “economic recovery and stability” while Americans risked their lives in Southeast Asia. J.F.K. threatened to sic his brother’s Justice Department on corporate records and then held firm as his opponents likened his flex of muscle to the power grabs of Hitler and Mussolini. (Sound familiar?) U.S. Steel capitulated in two days. The Times soon reported on its front page that Kennedy was at “a high point in popular support.”"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033337.txt_8391
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033337.txt
subject: FW:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/20/2018 5:58:37 PM", "subject": "FW:", "body": "Jeff — one of my friends sent me this today — it is the press release of the day | left DJT — how well | remember — |\nthought u would get a kick out of it -- Nick"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031798.txt_8393
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031798.txt
subject: Re: Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Schoen"], "timestamp": "11/29/2018 3:59:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal", "body": "yes, every outlet needs a sex story"}, {"sender": "David", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal", "body": "They try to keep this story going from every angle. Now dershowitz isn't involved; rather he is a high powered\nlawyer. I didn't know you also had lefkowitz. I met the guy once when a prospective client asked me to try a\ncase with him. One meeting was enough for me to see clearly that that would not have worked out well; but he\napparently is a successful lawyer.\n\nOne thing for sure the article gets wrong - that the \"victims\" were silenced.\nHope you are doing well."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031350.txt_8398
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031350.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:04 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "About 40,700,000 results (0.21 seconds)\nSearch Results\n1. Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia  \nen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey Epstein \nWikipedia \nJeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953) is an American financier and science and education \nphilanthropist. He worked at Bear Stearns early in his ... \nLife - Financial career - Science funding - Solicitation of prostitution \n2. Jeffrey Epstein: Sex Offender, Yes. Billionaire, No. - Forbes  \nwww.forbes.com/.../jeffrey-epstein-sex-offender-yes-bil... \nForbes \nby Clare O'Connor - in 138 Google+ circles  \nFeb 28, 2011 - The pervert of Palm Beach is back in the news, and back to being described as a \n\"billionaire\". Here's why he's not. \n3. Jeffrey Epstein Philanthropy: Overview  \nwwwjeffreyepstein.org/ \nJeffrey Epstein Philanthropy supports innovative research and programs in science, medicine, education and \ninternational affairs. \n4. Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation - New York, NY - Medical & Health ...  \nhttps://www.facebook.com/jeffreyepsteinvifoundation \nJeffrey Epstein VI Foundation, New York, NY. 27 likes • 1 talking about this. The Jeffrey Epstein VI \nFoundation was founded in 2000 by Jeffrey Epstein to sponsor ... \n5. Jeff Epstein profiles I LinkedIn  \nwww.linkedin.com/pub/dir/Jeff/Epstein \nView the profiles of professionals named Jeff Epstein on LinkedIn. There are 25 professionals named Jeff \nEpstein, who use LinkedIn to exchange information, ... \n6. Dr. Jeffrey M. Epstein, MD - Babylon, NY - Neurosurgery ...  \nwww.healthgrades.com New York (NY) Babylon  \nHealthGrades \nRating: 4.3 - 6 reviews \nVisit Healthgrades for information on Dr. Jeffrey M. Epstein, MD. Find Phone & Address information, \nmedical practice history, affiliated hospitals and more. \n7. Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator I New ...  \nnvpost.com/.../billionaire-jeffrey-epstein-im-a-... \nNew York Post \nby Amber Sutherland  \nFeb 25, 2011 - Billionaire pervert Jeffrey Epstein is back in New York City — and making \nwisecracks about his just-ended jail stint for having sex with an ... \n8. Woody Allen spotted with convicted child sex-offender Jeffrey ...  \nwww.dailymail.co.uk/.../Woody-Allen-spotted-convicted-chil... \nDaily Mail \nSep 24, 2013 - Woody Allen has been spotted strolling on New York's Upper East Side with millionaire \nchild sex-offender Jeffrey Epstein, who served time for ... \n9. Jeffrey Epstein: International Moneyman of Mystery  \nnymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n 7912/ \nNew York Magazine \nHe's pals with a passel of Nobel Prize—winning scientists, CEOs like Leslie Wexner of the Limited, socialite \nGhislaine Maxwell, even Donald Trump. But it wasn't ... \n10. Jeffrey Epstein 'kept a diary of his under-aged victims' - Telegraph  \nwww.telegraph.co.uk North America USA  \nThe Daily Telegraph \nMar 5, 2011 - The Duke of York's billionaire paedophile friend kept a secret journal, described as \"The Holy \nGrail\" by lawyers, which listed his alleged ... \n***********************************************************"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Mr. Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:20 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "We currently have two negatives on first page in Google but one is at 6th and the other at 7th. (Universal \nsearch, no history applied). Results will be very different if that PC has been used to click or search any of the \nresults and has not been cleared. \nHow did you pull the results you just sent? \nUsing Google Chrome + InCognito Mode + Clearing Browser Cache = only reliable reporting. I can help set \nyou up with this. Screenshot here of results using above method - http://i.imgur.com/tfGN3Zi.png. This is the \ntrue representation of what your average searcher will find (statistically, most searches will be from users \nwhom have not clicked on your negative articles before) \nMuch progress has been made since we spoke - premium placements are getting secured over next week, \nhundreds of links have been built to your primary sites and the first movements are kicking in today (NYMag \nmoved up to 4th a few hours ago). We still have confidence we are on the right track and doing everything we \ncan to get this cleaned up - another 45 days should be enough to have a clean first page based on what has \nbeen done. \nPS - The foundation site was just hacked and I'm in the process of fixing that today. You can actually see it in \nthe screenshot above (it reads Cash Advance advertisement in the short-description). This is something a \nprevious company deployed but we are now going through and securing the rest of the domains to prevent \nbasic hijacks like this. \nI'm free on my cell for next few hours."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:21 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "new computer virgin isalnds"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/24/2014 8:25:54 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Can you set up Google Chrome and use Incognito Mode? \nIf you search while signed into your Google account is impacts things, but using Incognito mode will resolve \nthat. \nChrome here https://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/browser/  \nOnce installed... \nOpen an incognito window \n1. Click the Chrome menu \non the browser toolbar. \n2. Select New incognito window. \n3. A new window will open with the incognito icon \nin the corner. \nYou can also use the keyboard shortcuts Ctr1+Shift+N (Windows, Linux, and Chrome OS) and N-Shift-N (Mac) to open \nan incognito window."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028601.txt_8404
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028601.txt
subject: Re: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "At cheryl's...sitting with her...watching trump shit...is Google going to happen?\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I have two more bidders"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im told southern District trying yo get out a rico claim against the org"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 6:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You are not in nyc now are you?\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you nuts. im a cowardly warm blooded jew. call me"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will at some point....what time do you leave tomorrow\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 8:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Turns out you were right about sdny but they are \"going to wait their turn\"...\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Civil or crime"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Crim\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Still have to figure out what my role is in all this shit...\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you seemed to imply that your new guy could only shoot blanks? if thats so. its an easy decision. , if not. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not my new guy...not repping him\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think he has the goods?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "So....remarkably...in the middle of dealing with thiss the Steptoe numbercrunchers advise me Jeffrey has paid about 450 and owes about 300 and seems disinclined to make Steptoe whole.....hhhhhmmmm....first reaction is déjà vu.... How the fuck are we back here after the unspeakably awful evan barr debacle.... More to the point just tell me where you are on this....did miller fuck up? Something else? As you know I am the 800 pound gorilla here, Steptoe is not going to chase you down for the money but there are 500 lawyers here, processes, etc......"}, {"sender": "J [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "i suggest we wait until face to face yes he fucked up. but"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Ok....but give me an idea what follows the but....otherwise I will imagine the worst...."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "im not sheyl, frankly i havent been involved in this at all except for the ridiculousness . we will resolve it by end of month. ."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Rajeev misra....softbank vision fund...any special jeffrey insights here?"}, {"sender": "J [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 25, 2019 7:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If he wants you to rep him. YES"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Cal me if you get a chance.."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "1/26/2019 5:56:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dp6-Y6IHECo please watch with the eys that i have opened for you."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026317.txt_8406
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026317.txt
subject: Re: Kuhn - Radical Breakthroughs
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 11:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "Jeffrey:\n\nHow’s all in our crazy world?\n\nI’m in NY until August 31 (then again, after Beijing, Sept. 25 — Oct. 14). If you are in town, meet?\n\nWhen convenient, I’d like you to meet Peter Getzels, Closer To Truth producer/director (I’ve worked with Peter for 12 years); he would very much like to meet you in person, describe the Radical Breakthroughs process in detail, get your feedback. He would come up from DC. We can always do Skype, of course, but Peter would appreciate to meet in person early in the process. Breakthroughs is a Big Project, big opportunity for impact. All are truly excited.\n\nBelow are highlights of Breakthroughs progress.\n\nAttached is latest CNN on trade war and below are links (caution: a few weeks old is ancient history in Trump time)."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 19, 2018, at 7:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "I might return , to ny this week not sure yet"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn <g>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 19, 2018, at 10:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "If return, let me know; if not, ’m back Sept 25 - Oct. 14."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/23/2018 6:28:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "Two short commentaries on our favorite Trade War - CNBC yesterday, Fox Business today.\n\nCNBC - August 22, 2018\nhttps://www.cnbc.com/video/2018/08/22/us-and-china-have-self-\n\nfulfilling-prophecies-on-both-sides-for-trade-says-expert.html\n\nFox Business - August 23, 2018\nhttp://video.foxbusiness.com/v/5825805484001/? playlist id=3166411\n\n554001#sp=show-clips"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031344.txt_8407
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031344.txt
subject:
  Jerrold Nadler's investigation seems rigged to me: Why are two leading Trump foes heading up his probe? - New York Daily News

messages:
  [{"sender": "DAVID SCHOEN", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/6/2019 6:26:30 PM", "subject": "Jerrold Nadler's investigation seems rigged to me: Why are two leading Trump foes heading up his probe? - New York Daily News", "body": "Importance: High \nhttps://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-oped-jerrold-nadlers-investigation-seems-rigged-to-me-20190305-story.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032285.txt_8408
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032285.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Lando", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:07:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023026.txt_8431
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023026.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 122 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\n\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial and the witness list which names and other young women who allege they were underage victims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their claims.\n\nMs further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and instructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of entertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact information is contained in an address book of Mr Epstein's filed in court records.\n\nMay we have a comment please? Our deadline is 1pm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET.\n\nYours sincerely,\nSharon Churcher\nThe Mail on Sunday (New York office)\nPh:"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Fred Haddad", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Fred Haddad", "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Debbie Fein"], "timestamp": "10/19/2013 12:27:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032983.txt_8434
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032983.txt
subject: Re: Masa
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "Have you met Masa yet? Seems to me he is a person you should know and you are a person he should know.\n\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/03/business/dealbook/masayoshi-son-sprint-and-a-bet-on-the-trump-economy.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:17 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "have not met"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "Seems to me he is a natural guy for you; he is going to be in Florida in March for some Trump event.\nI know some of his financial guys pretty well: I might try to facilitate something if you are not opposed."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "3/3/2017 4:27:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "great , thanks, or new york , or this weekend as donald arrives at 5pm tonight"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031422.txt_8437
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031422.txt
subject: Fw: Google Alert - jeffrey epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "gmax1@ellmax.com", "recipients": ["J Jep jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/28/2015 3:47:18 AM", "subject": "Fw: Google Alert - jeffrey epstein", "body": "Check out trump"}, {"sender": "Google Alerts <googlealerts-noreply@google.com>", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Friday, 27 February 2015 21:00", "subject": "Google Alert - jeffrey epstein", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032393.txt_8438
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032393.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["lvjet", "Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 15, 2016 11:16 am", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "wont leave until 8 pm torow"}, {"sender": "Lvjet", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 4:29:32 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "message received, not before 8pm very good\nNOTE.\nUPdated President Elect schedule:\nTrump Plane to arrive Orlando at 5pm friday for event,, then arrive Palm Beach estimate lOpm,. He usually runs late, so\n11pm could be realistic time for his PBI Arrival,.\n***the airport only shuts down for 20 min before and after his arrival,.\nI'll keep you posted if time changes,.\nthx\nLarry"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032773.txt_8440
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032773.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/5/2018 10:38:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I can’t get to Boston tomorrow—but thanks for inviting. Where in NYT did you see this—can’t find."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, May 5, 2018 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "nyt says trump talking directly to steve"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023216.txt_8443
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023216.txt
subject: jobs ahead
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler", "Melanie Spinella", "Ada Clapp"], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 5:18 AM", "subject": "jobs ahead", "body": "1. review accounting system. Book keeping software. staff, ( senior accountant ) methods on line banking, brokerage. cash mgmt. airplane reimbursement. boat sale. art purchases sales use and sales tax. tax filings FBAR FATCA, gaming commission, pfics, insurance . uk co law.\n\n2. review docs for TRA BRH grants, trusts, heritage will, insurance, art lending. medical, springing powers. two fire drill books. one needed for injury. other for death\n\n3 review bills . boats , planes, legal, (PW, McFarlands all outside. legal and accounting. Toms bills over 400k . house projects. south ny ben\n\n4 cashflow projections tax projections , interaction with Apollo accounting tax, Phaidon ,art space ,and Regan. legal accounting. audit\n\n5. children meetings , review to date and allocations\n\n6 review all role in payables. files scanned, no paper\n\n7 review investments for tax basis and unrecognized gain\n\n8 schedule of all hedge funds . redeemables commitments etc.\n\n9 charities pledges structure, staff,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 5:52 AM", "subject": "jobs ahead", "body": "1) pg 1 A\" unequal shares\". pg 23 \"removal of trustees \" absolute. dont be confused with ability to set up Seperate trusts, , 2) I am reachable this afternoon in europe. on cell. 3. on another note . -our financial agreement ended months ago . seperate from the art partnership (which i was told yesterday to my amazement is still not funded) . Iam obligated to complete ? the time i have dedicated since oct/ dec has been spent mainly as your friend. tom, brad though i am fully cognizant of my responsiblities. I will try to help find people. I am not good at human resources. howevr If I dont think they are good enough for you. I will continue to say so _, and you obviously decide. but I will reiterrate even in the face of your \"nobody is good enough argument.\" keeping foremost in my mind that you and I have only beeen shown a very tiny handful of people. 4. I find the friction over fees , counterproductive. in an attempt to avoid it I had suggested a multi year deal early on. you rejected it. I then suggested, and urged you to have an option at a fixed fee , you also rejected that .you wanted the fee payment only at the end I argued but ,conceded. I suggested a structure that tom didn't like. you rejected it. 5 I suggest you make a fair proposal.- that i can either accept or reject. some payment up front this time is a requirement. I am willing to modify any outstanding obligations. - there are creative ways to assure you of your desired characterization of those payments. 6 you should open accts at Deutsch . and goldman. I am told that eilleen has set up over one hundred bank acccts for you???!!._ few relevant 7 you should immediatly demand a list of all her acct authorites , exec poistions . director etc. bank authorizsations. etc. talk later or over the weekend if you like\n\ncoordination with Suydam Kathy gregory, I would suggest limiting to one person. The increasing public profile needs to be taken into consideration.\ntalk later.."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:16 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "you said"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018038.txt_8445
source_file: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018038.txt
subject: Re: Possible Statement
messages:
  [{"sender": "Alan Dershowitz <dersh@law.harvard.edu>", "recipients": ["David Boies <DBoies@BSFLLP.com>"], "timestamp": "December 9, 2015 at 2:50:58 PM EST", "subject": "Re: Possible Statement", "body": "We should be aiming at a short simple statement such as:\n\n\"The events at issue occurred approximately 15 years ago when | was a teenager. Although | believed then and\ncontinued to believe that AD was the person with whom | had sex, recent developments raise the possibility that this\nmay be a case of mistaken identification. \"\n\nAlternative:\n\n\"that it may have been someone else\".\n\n\"That someone mistakenly told me it was him.\"\n\nWe should be able to come up with a mutually acceptable statement. It would be acceptable if the statement came from\nyou rather than her, if she prefers."}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz <dersh@law.harvard.edu>", "recipients": ["David Boies <DBoies@BSFLLP.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 9, 2015, at 10:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Possible Statement", "body": "David\nHave we given up on a mutually acceptable statement from VR or you. Let's keep trying. We are not THAT far apart.\nAlan."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030714.txt_8446
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030714.txt
subject: Skripal, Syria, And England Are All Victims Of The Globalist War On Trump I Geopolitica.RU
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/16/2018 11:19:55 AM", "subject": "Skripal, Syria, And England Are All Victims Of The Globalist War On Trump I Geopolitica.RU", "body": "https://www.geopolitica.ru/en/article/skripal-syria-and-england-are-all-victims-globalist-war-trump\n\nDugan's analysis with shout out"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026176.txt_8449
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026176.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Im certain you understand - I'm sure you will have a great new year . No need to respond"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, at 11:51 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thnx jeff.. i m praying"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "the book worked. :)"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "hey shiek i will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night.. if you bussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "only you please"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "enjoy"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 1:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well .. safe travel"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will return to new york wednesday or tues day night. ."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i dont know your plans but of course you are always invited to visit. florida. if i am here"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/22/2017 3:15:47 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "that is nice of you .. you keep hosting us .. we need to see you in kuwait \nwill write more once i arrive and see my dear old man sunday"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023564.txt_8457
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023564.txt
subject: (BN) Leon Black’s Tax-Overhaul Dilemma Could Alter Wall Street Model
messages:
  [{"sender": "Glenn Dubin (DUBIN & COMPANY LP)", "recipients": ["undisclosed-recipients:", "jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, December 27 2017 05:02 PM", "subject": "(BN) Leon Black’s Tax-Overhaul Dilemma Could Alter Wall Street M", "body": "Leon Black’s Tax-Overhaul Dilemma Could Alter Wall Street Model\n2017-12-27 11:00:00.2 GMT\n\nBy Simone Foxman and David Carey\n\n(Bloomberg) -- Leon Black recently posed a question whose\nanswer will determine how profitable the new U.S. tax regime\ncould make Wall Street firms like his Apollo Global Management\nLLC.\n\nPublicly traded partnerships, such as Apollo, are taxed\ndifferently than corporations. So should Apollo take advantage\nof the overhauled tax rules to pay less in taxes? Or should it\nuse this chance to change to an Inc. from an LLC, which would\nincrease its tax bill but allow it to attract investments from\nmutual funds that have previously been out of reach?\n\n“We're still analyzing,”’ Black told the Goldman Sachs U.S.\nFinancial Services Conference Dec. 6. “It’s an uncertain\noutcome.”\n\nEither way, it’s most likely a money-making outcome. The\ntax changes are a boon for private equity firms such as Apollo,\nwhere Black is chief executive officer. The new lower corporate\nrate has made it possible for bigger publicly traded\npartnerships to consider the change. As it is, management fees,\nwhich typically account for 30 percent or more of their\nearnings, are already taxed at the corporate rate. That will\ndrop. The legislation scarcely touched the 23.8 percent rate\npaid on incentive fees, also called carried interest, which\n\nincur no additional levy when paid out to shareholders.\n\nDouble Tax\n\nIf the partnerships converted to corporations, the\n\nincentive fees would be hit with a second layer of tax when\nthey’re paid out. That would push the combined tax rate on\nincentive income paid out as dividends to nearly 40 percent,\naccording to Peter Furci, co-chair of Debevoise & Plimpton’s\nglobal tax practice.\n\nBut it would also allow the newly minted corporations\n\naccess to indexes, and therefore the mutual-fund and ETF\nmarkets. About $2.2 trillion follows the S&P 500 Index,\naccording to its website. As of June, $122.6 billion in assets\ntracked the Russell 2000 Index, the best-known small-cap U.S."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025636.txt_8460
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025636.txt
subject: Re: an article you may both hate. or like.
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 10, 2015, at 12:02 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "I think religion plays a major positive role in many lives. . i dont like fanaticism on either side. . sorry"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:10 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Ps. My piece argued against fanaticism."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 18, 2015, at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "you can invite depp to visit us when you are in the caribean"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss <lkrauss@asu.edu>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/18/2015 6:26:27 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "When I was with him yesterday I told him we were going to caribbean and he asked where.. He has an island in\nbahamas, making you two the only people I know who own islands.. :) will ask him if he is free then. He is\nremarkable in new movie, though the film itself is not fantastic.. he is also a pretty good guitarist.. his show\nwith alice cooper and joe perry in la was great."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028870.txt_8466
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028870.txt
subject: Re: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/19/2014 7:46:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course not , he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "train? yes ,1 will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" welll -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me....just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026459.txt_8470
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026459.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "at the moment we will go to Ish on sunday the 26th early then to new york where i will stay the week,\n\nlarry , it will be and I, trump is in town that week,"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:37", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will you want to bring back or for the week you are in NY?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "11/16/2017 11:47:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026162.txt_8474
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026162.txt
subject: Re: I look forward to hearing from you
messages:
  [{"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:11 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\ncan you please tell me about your interest in the vagus nerve? Why is the vagus nerve important to you?\nPerhaps you can refer me to web site where I can learn more about your take on it.\nbest wishes,\nStanley"}, {"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 25, 2017 2:56 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "What nice coverage in the Huffington Post.\nLiving in Europe, I was not aware that Trump's proposed cuts will be so devastating to the scientific\ncommunity.\nYou asked me if I would be in New York September 18. Did you have something in mind?\nI am 77 and do not travel so well. I have cut back on my plans to travel. I can consider coming to New York,\nSeptember has anything to do specifically with the vagus nerve - and if it cannot be done with a conference\ncall on Skype.\nI will be able to stop in NYC on a future trip.\nLinda Stone was the person who I met with years ago. It was Linda who suggested that I contact you.\nbest wishes,\nStanley"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Stanley Rosenberg"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 25, 2017 3:22 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/private-donor-helps-fund-scientists-after-trumps-proposed us 599f532ae4b0dOef9f1c129d"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Stanley Rosenberg"], "timestamp": "25 Aug 2017, at 09.49", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "I recall. Let's skype or phone"}, {"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/25/2017 10:13:23 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "I am free today after 8 o'clock a. m. EST until 3 p."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029251.txt_8476
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029251.txt
subject: Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New <________________>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:01 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nAs you probably know, Woody Allen's legal team said that we couldn't use the film we shot of him: online, \nfor broadcast, anywhere. \nIt was a fantastic experience taping with him and so, even if I can't ever use the footage, I'm still grateful to \nyou for making the day possible. But of course I'd like to use the footage. I decided when--way back-- we got \nthis very negative answer back from his lawyers that I should just take my time about asking --since it would \ntake us 2 years to be ready to edit the footage anyway (The online course is chronological. When I taped \nWoody we were still back in 1730. Now we've gotten to the 1920s) \nWell, we've now arrived at the season when we'll be editing materials on William Carlos Williams for our \ncourse on Modernism and, as we discussed on Saturday, on poetry and other arts, The Poetry of Art, Sport, \nand Play \nI would also, of course, love to make a tv episode out of the conversation, but the threshold question is \nwhether he'll let us use it for anything at all. In case it would matter, \nOther performers who have already taped with me include \nJohn Lithgow, \nDiane Paulus \nJulie Taymor \nNas \nEve Ensler \nDamian Woetzel \nKate Burton \nLil Buck Riley \nAlfre Woodard \nHerbie Hancock \nTony Kushner \nNatalia Zukerman \nand those who have agreed to tape with me include \nSally Field \nLena Dunham \nYo Yo Ma \nAnna Deveare Smith \nand more. \nThose in other fields include journalists, senators, president clinton etc etc. You've read my pitch before (many \ntimes) \nHis is one of only two releases that we haven't gotten. What do you think of my chances?\nLisa"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "12/7/2015 7:04:18 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "send me the list of policticans the list you sent will generate an of course not"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032767.txt_8477
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032767.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Apr 10, 2018, at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump will probably hire dershowitz, no joke"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/10/2018 4:43:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.justice.gov/usam/usam-9-13000-obtaining-evidence#9-13.420"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023202.txt_8479
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023202.txt
subject: Re: and....another bit of advice ...P on WA
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New [i@???.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:01 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...P on WA", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nAs you probably know, Woody Allen's legal team said that we couldn't use the film we shot of him: online,\nfor broadcast, anywhere.\n\nIt was a fantastic experience taping with him and so, even if I can't ever use the footage, I'm still grateful to\n\nyou for making the day possible. But of course I'd like to use the footage. I decided when--way back-- we got\nthis very negative answer back from his lawyers that I should just take my time about asking --since it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...P on WA", "body": "send me the list of policticans the list you sent will generate an of course not"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...P on WA", "body": "politicians I have taped\n\nBill Clinton\n\nAl Gore,\n\nJohn McCain\n\nMayor Rahm Emanuel\n\nMayor Tom Menino\n\nSupreme Court Justice Elena Kagan\n\nSir Mervyn King\n\nFormer Sec of Treasury Larry Summers\n\nyeses from politicians not yet scheduled\n\nVice President Biden\n\nSenator Mark Warner\n\nGovernor Jerry Brown\n\nUN representative Samantha Power\n\nformer sec of State, Henry Kissinger\n\nformer Sec of State Condaleeza Rice\n\nformer Chancellor of the NYC schools, Joel Klein\n\nIn other categories I have taped\n\nFrank Gehry, architect\n\nKatie Couric , David Brooks and Andrea Mitchell, journalists\nRichard Dawkins and Peter Gallison, scientists\n\nHead of the College Board, David Coleman\n\nDean of Harvard Law School, Martha Minow\n\nplus several poets laureate....."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "12/7/2015 7:35:13 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...P on WA", "body": "better list to present woody"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032230.txt_8491
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032230.txt
subject: Fw: Meet?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Mosk, Matthew", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016 6:08 PM", "subject": "Meet?", "body": "Mr. Weinberg — \nI am a reporter with the ABC News investigative unit. We are gathering background research on the major candidates \nfor President. \nSeeing that both former President Clinton and Mr. Trump have been mentioned in connection to the Jeffrey Epstein \ncase, I am interested in better understanding the case, it's current status, and any information that could help explain \nMr. Epstein's dealings and interactions with both men. \nI would very much appreciate the chance to meet and discuss this subject in an off the record conversation at your \nearliest convenience. \nPlease let me know if that would be possible, and if so, when and where we could meet.\nMany thanks,\nMatthew"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/21/2016 12:18:58 AM", "subject": "Fw: Meet?", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032556.txt_8495
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032556.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:44 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "catch up today?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Buying a new kayak...hard negotiations going on...will call when I am done...Rudy next ag..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "1 340 775 8111"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/26/2017 1:51:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If trump fires mueller and gets away with it it is 1933 berlin"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029429.txt_8496
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029429.txt
subject: Fwd: A message on the Trump Administration Proposal on Indirect Costs
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jcichi", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/7/2017 12:05:21 PM", "subject": "Fwd: A message on the Trump Administration Proposal on Indirect Costs", "body": "FYI"}, {"sender": "\"Maria T. Zuber\" <P", "recipients": ["all-research@mit.edu"], "timestamp": "July 6, 2017 at 12:27:05 PM EDT", "subject": "A message on the Trump Administration Proposal on Indirect Costs", "body": "Dear colleagues,\n\nWe are writing to alert you to an issue that threatens all of MIT’s federally funded research activities but that is often underappreciated. Werre referring to the Trump Administration’s proposal to put a 10 percent cap on indirect cost reimbursements to universities by the National Institutes of Health — an idea that is already beginning to be talked about for other federal agencies as well.\n\nAn article explaining indirect costs and why they are important to MIT can be found in the most recent Faculty Newsletter: http://web.mit.edu/fnl/volume/295/zuber.html.\n\nThe Administration’s proposed cuts to federal R&D agency budgets have rightly been met with consternation on campus. The indirect cost cap proposal is actually an even graver danger because it is easier for the government to institute, and it would do far-reaching damage that is harder to reverse. We need faculty and research staff to understand the devastating effects that capping indirect cost would cause to MIT and other research institutions.\n\nThe indirect cost cap is easier to implement than a cut to the budget because the Administration can act unilaterally without Congressional approval. The proposed agency budget cuts are already running into strong headwinds on both sides of the aisle in Congress, and they cannot move forward without 60 votes in the U.S. Senate. The indirect cost cap, by contrast, does not attract the same level of attention because it is not well understood, and the Administration can simply impose a cap — at a single agency, or at all of them (since indirect cost reimbursement is fairly uniform across the government now).\n\nWhat would a 10 percent cap mean for MIT? A 10 percent cap on all federal agencies would cost MIT around $100 million a year. To put that in context, the financial crisis of 2008, where we saw a significant decline in endowment, required us to reduce spending by this same order of magnitude. Fortunately, the recovery of the endowment was relatively quick, and we were able to recoup some of that loss. In this case, the 10 percent cap is unlikely to be altered in the foreseeable future. Since this is a recurring cost, attempting to"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033280.txt_8504
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033280.txt
subject: New Yorker
messages:
  [{"sender": "Vincenzo Lozzo", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/14/2018 9:40:46 PM", "subject": "New Yorker", "body": "I think this is a very good article in case you missed https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/michael-\ncohen-and-the-end-stage-of-the-trump-presidency"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025971.txt_8508
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025971.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:42:23 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "congragulations"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:01:22 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i think it was terrific , the only thing i would think about is having only one lit sculpture atatime . put one\n\nin storage or covered , but you want to call attention to one at a time."}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:06:27 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and maybe have the large colums black instead of gold, as the gold paint is not as good as the gold metal\nobjects."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030525.txt_8512
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030525.txt
subject: Fwd: <no subject>
messages:
  [{"sender": "gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance\n\nhttp://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html\n\nby Vicky Ward\n\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“I’ve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been. You will never think the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that focused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fair story that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself.\n\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept running into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of young women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. “Do they speak?” I remember asking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. “Not like you, Vicky,” was his riposte.\n\nI remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn’t studied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at home via messenger. It was a book: “Math for idiots.”"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 10:48 PM", "subject": "Fwd: <no subject>", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022929.txt_8513
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022929.txt
subject: Re: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg [ni", "recipients": ["Hill, James E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "James, just confirming that you are sending me the bulletpoints from the interview you are asking about, thanksMarty"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032332.txt_8518
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032332.txt
subject: Activity in Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Doe v. Trump et al Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
messages:
  [{"sender": "NYSD_ECF Pool@nysd.uscourts.gov", "recipients": ["CourtMail@nysd.uscourts.gov"], "timestamp": "Friday, November 04, 2016 5:59 PM", "subject": "Activity in Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Doe v. Trump et al Notice of Voluntary Dismissal", "body": "This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.\n*** NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.\nU.S. District Court\nSouthern District of New York\n\nNotice of Electronic Filing\n\nThe following transaction was entered by Meagher, Thomas on 11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT and filed on 11/4/2016\n\nCase Name: Doe v. Trump et al\nCase Number: 1:16-cv-07673-RA\nFiler: Jane Doe\nDocument Number: Is\n\nDocket Text:\n\nNOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Jane Doe. (Meagher, Thomas)\n\n1:16-cv-07673-RA Notice has been electronically mailed to:\n\nMichael C. Miller\nPartner\n\nwww.steptoe.com/mmiller"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032542.txt_8519
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032542.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/14/2017 7:17:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "any tips on how we should communicate with him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 9:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "much to do around the trump trip. I hope you are enjoying."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031595.txt_8526
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031595.txt
subject: Re: Trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 9:49:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "research how he paid for mara lago . matt was his bagman„ trump shuttle. . trump casino review sec filing \nto see the backdates taking of money"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump. \nBecause of this. \n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is \neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it --\nJeffrey enjoys his social life.\" \n\nThat story will never die."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032224.txt_8527
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032224.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/27/2015 2:38:04 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Will leave @ 9, so will be in ny @ 1 pm."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015, at 10:21 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what time, I will come up"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:18 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Going up to NY Friday morning. Think I am going to drive. I will then stop to pee and get gas at a rest stop on the New Jersey turnpike, will observe all of the people there who are at least 100 pounds overweight, will have a mild panic attack as a result of the observation, and will then decide that I am not eating another bite of food for the rest of my life out of fear that I will end up like one of these people"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015, at 10:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ill give you details when i see you, when are you in ny?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:28 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Trump is living proof of the adage that it is better to be lucky than smart."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019219.txt_8529
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019219.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Katily Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:11 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Trump is so gross. Privileged - Redacted\nL._"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 10, 2017, at 7:20 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "worse in real life and upclose."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:24 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Hard to imagine. He really does remind me of mcgyver and I am suffering ptsd."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 11, 2017, at 5:57 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "if hes mcguyver. are you marla maples?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/11/2017 1:37:47 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "No, I ranked much much lower"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032834.txt_8532
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032834.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 20, 2018 4:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you might want to tell your dem friends that treating trump like a mafia don , ignores the fact that he has great\ndangerous power.. tightening the noose too slowly , risks a very bad situation.. gambino was never the\ncommander in chief. there was little gambino could do as the walls closed in. not so with this maniac"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/20/2018 7:28:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not a stupid point...he is starting to behave very erratically...."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033112.txt_8536
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033112.txt
subject: Re: Introduction
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Neal Kassell"], "timestamp": "Sep 3, 2018, at 8:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Jeffrey - Neal\nNeither of you requires introduction. I've known Jeffrey 28 years and this isn't a joke -\nDonald Trump introduced us. I first met Neal in 16 years ago when Bob Pine\nintroduced us ...\nNeal will be visiting NYC end of month.\nI think you would both enjoy spending time together -\nThanks to you both for always supporting me.\nYou are both copied."}, {"sender": "Neal Kassell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 3, 2018, at 8:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Thanks\nJeffery — look forward to meeting you. Wish was with us. I will be in New York from Tuesday the\n25th through Friday, 28 September. Let me know if you are available.\nBe well."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 3, 2018, at 8:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "yes, will be in town , coordiante a time closer . look forward to it"}, {"sender": "Neal Kassell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 3, 2018 at 8:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Will do\nDoes Leslie do your schedule?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Neal Kassell"], "timestamp": "9/4/2018 1:40:13 AM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "yes"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028946.txt_8553
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028946.txt
subject: Re: Poetry Update and Thank You
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/2/2015 4:55:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "That's ideal. Larry's away and I'll be working all day. I'm free any time."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "I'm in Cambridge sat?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["this public"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 2 December 2015", "subject": "Re: Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \n\nMay I drop by before the New Year (perhaps on the 9th, or on the 17th or 18th?) to get your advice \nabout my renewal of the Templeton campaign, and also my needs in the coming year for Poetry in \nAmerica? Below is the letter I'm sending out to my friends and supporters, and at the bottom a \nmessage just for you.... \n\n-Lisa\n\nThat you are receiving this letter means that you are among a special community of friends whose \nsupport— financial, moral, intellectual, logistical— has allowed my initiative, Poetry in America, to \nrealize what seemed, a year ago, almost certainly too ambitious a vision. That vision was to \nproduce the highest quality educational video on American poetry, creating a body of \nhumanities content capable of reaching a broad community of learners: formal and informal, \nonline and residential, young and old, American and international. And it was to \nbegin— rapidly— to disseminate and distribute our work. \n\nWhether you donated to Poetry in America through Filmmaker's Collaborative (our 501c3 fiscal \nsponsor), through Harvard, or through WGBH; whether you appeared on camera or talked an \nelusive friend into appearing on camera to discuss a poem; whether you lent us your film crew, or \nprovided overnight use of your hotel suite or apartment or of your whole skyscraper; whether you \nhighlighted our work on your stage, or talked your colleagues into becoming corporate sponsors; \nwhether you flew to Boston to install state-of-the-art editing and video storage equipment, or asked \nyour children's school to let us film there; whether you encouraged your family foundation to take an \ninterest in the project, or gave us a lesson in IP, in licensing, in the rudiments of finance, or of \ndistribution; whether you praised, or gave timely, much-needed criticism— you enabled what we \nhave done. \n\nHere's what we have to report, and to show, a year later, thanks to your help. Links offer sneak \npeeks of works -in-progress across the full portfolio of Poetry in America projects. \n\n• The first eight-episode season of the public television series Poetry in America (a co-\nproduction between WGBH, Emmy Award-winning filmmaker David Grubin, and my own new \nproduction company, Verse Video), is now fully funded and in production, with episodes featuring  \nBill Clinton, Herbie Hancock and Sonia Sanchez on Langston Hughes, Frank Gehry on Carl \nSandburg, Katie Couric on Elizabeth Bishop, Nas on Whitman, and many more scheduled for \nnationwide launch in 2017. \n\n• Poetry in America's many initiatives to reach Middle and High School teachers and their \n! I students are taking root. Our first online course for Middle and High School Teachers, Poetry of \nthe City, will launch this Spring with the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Companion \nmaterials to this course will be made available for free on PBS LearningMedia. This course is \ndesigned to meet the needs of English Language Arts and Social Studies teachers in the US and \ninternationally. \n\n• We are eager to begin production of The Poetry of Earth, Sea, and Sky. Designed, too, for \nMiddle and High School teachers, The Poetry of Earth, Sea, and Sky will draw English Language \nArts instruction into dialogue with science, and will include extraordinary footage of the natural  \nworld, conversations with poets, scholars, and scientists as well as footage shot in class and in the \nfield with great teachers. \n\n• A recent partnership with Greenwich Country Day School and the Success Academy Network \nof charter schools will provide a base for the production of a new collection of classroom-ready \neducational material on The Poetry of Art Sport, and Play. This collection will include discussions \non poems filmed everywhere from sports fields to Broadway theaters, and will feature dancers, \nathletes, fashion designers, and more. \n\n• With a growing archive of footage capturing teachers and students reading American poems, \nwe are eager to expand our reach and move into America's schools, disseminating, testing, \nand learning from teachers and students using our materials. We hope to be able to begin work \nevaluating the impact of poetry on literacy levels and character development and, eventually, to \nproduce a full suite of materials that foster character development along with intellectual growth. \nWorking closely with such partners as The Nantucket Project, Nautilus Magazine, The Aspen Ideas \nFestival, and The Big Think, and, of course, HarvardX, Harvard's provider of free open online \ncourses, we are continuing to create rich educational media on poetry for adult learners and \nlifelong learners. These materials include short form videos such as this one on Robert Pinsky's  \n\"Shirt\" (as featured in The New Yorker), and, this spring, the sixth module of the free seven-part \nPoetry in America MOOC, which has registrants in over 150 countries. \n\nGrowing rapidly, and outpacing our current staff and infrastructure, Poetry in America has a \nfundraising goal this year of 2.5 million dollars to fund its expanding group of projects. We've taken \na big step, hiring the design agency Threespot to help us develop our web presence. Our \nwebsite— to launch early 2016— will eventually serve as an online hub for our TV show and \neducational projects. We hope you'll join us then for a virtual launch! \n\nFinally, Jeffrey, you have been such a wonderful supporter of my Poetry in America project. The \nLeon Black gift changed everything for me last year. It paid salaries for staff I desperately needed to \ncomplete projects (detail below), but first and foremost, it gave me leverage, enabling me to set \ndown a solid Harvard base for my activities by giving the school something to point to: this public \nhumanities project among the list of projects the Dean supports. The money did it: as soon as they \nheard about the gift, they took my project more seriously. Because of that gift, the Faculty of Arts \nand Sciences, which is space-stingy, found and rewired a studio space for me to house my video \nproduction operation and team. That gift woke up the Deans to the importance of Harvard's role in \nproducing the highest quality humanities content for the WORLD, and not just for Harvard students. \nMy main employee has half of her salary paid with these funds, and the foundation of our collection \nfor PBS LeamingMedia is being made with this support. This gift represented one of the most \nconsequential shifts of the last year, allowing me create content and launch projects this year that \nmake future projects that much more likely. If I can keep this base sturdy at Harvard, refilling these \ncoffers, I will be that much more able to keep working. \n\nI am also so grateful for the help you gave me in defining my project for Templeton, and, what help \nyou have offered to give in bringing them around. I have, since Templeton turned me down, gotten \nfunding to produce video on two of the poems I'd proposed to Templeton and to create, and test, \nthat video in schools as I proposed. One of my partners in that project is Success Academy, where I \ncould also expand my work with Templeton. And there are still other poems that may satisfy their \ncharacter criteria more fully, including the third of the poems I'd originally proposed and that Joe \nBiden had agreed to discuss with me (on parenthood and humility). At this point, I'm gaining the \nplatform and the name recognition to be an effective spokesperson for the foundation on building \nliteracy and character in the schools. \n\nIt really means a lot to me, all financial help aside, Jeffrey, that you are rooting for me and thinking \nabout me. You push back a lot (as Larry does), and it's always annoying but I always learn. \n\nWith abundant gratitude, \nLisa"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029401.txt_8555
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029401.txt
subject: Republican health care experts dismiss Donald Trump’s ideas
messages:
  [{"sender": "Donald Rubin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/22/2017 7:31:32 PM", "subject": "Republican health care experts dismiss Donald Trump’s ideas", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nThis cannot be true, can it? This guy must be as dumb about this stuff as a tampon laced with arsenic!!\nHELP!\n\nGreat meeting yesterday — really enjoyed it.\n\nAnd happy birthday again, Don"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026288.txt_8556
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026288.txt
subject: Re: Hello
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "B. Jeannie Rhee, hand-picked by Mueller from Mueller's own firm, was actually Clinton's lawyer in the email investigation. Now how does that look. She also is a bully and thinks she is a real tough guy and I don't want that kind of character around. I also have an ineffective assistance of counsel case against her for a client in a $100 million earnings management fraud case in which she was way over her head.\n\nC. Greg Andres was another bully who replaced Weissmann in the EDNY. He withheld evidence terribly in his cases, regularly threatened others, and accused a defendant of putting out a contract on him when he knew it was a completely bogus claim, but gave him the publicity he craved. He is 100% in the pro-Clinton, anti-Trump camp. President Obama gave his wife a federal judgeship on the SDNY\n\nand on and on.\n\nI don't personally believe Russia affected the election at all; but I certainly am not qualified to say. I do know that we have meddled in other countries' elections as a matter of policy forever. But the bottom line is, if there is to be an investigation, just play it straight up. I am friends for a long time with the IG. If they had picked him to head up the team, I would not be a weekly guest on Hannity tv and radio (I never would have been asked), as I Know he would pick a team of honest folks from across the spectrum."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Devid Schoen"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 8:10 am", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "is itoverblown. ? — all mob prosecutors have strong feelings towards their targets. I recall many that told stories of how they despised gotti etc. why is stryok different ?"}, {"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "I am obsessed with prosecutorial and FBI misconduct wherever it rears it ugly head and i am committed to doing what i can to fight it whether for my death penalty clients or a klansman. Lots of wrongdoing here and we all lose when the system breaks down.\n\nI assume you were just flipping the channels.\n\nHope you are doing well. I see they never miss an opportunity to try to drag you in - saw an article the other day asking how you missed the #metoo press and tying you to trump. Didn't mention much of all you have been put through already. I hope the cases are all behind you now. I would have liked to have helped; but i guess you and your team decided on a different direction. Whatever works best."}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "Just checking in to see how you are getting along these days. I hope all the litigation is well behind you and things are going well\n\nTake care.\nDavid\nDavid I. Schoen"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030150.txt_8557
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030150.txt
subject: Re: Reporter question
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kate Briquelet", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 29, 2019 12:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Reporter question", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nHope all is well. Noticed this Guardian story about Michael Wolff's new book, which states Donald Trump purchased a Palm Beach property Mr. Epstein had planned to buy, behind Mr. Epstein's back. And that Mr. Epstein threatened to expose Trump's shady real estate deals. Do you know anything about this? Does Mr. Epstein have any knowledge of illegal or suspicious dealings by President Trump?\n\nhttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/may/28/bannon-trump-organization-criminal-enterprise-comments-michael-wolff-book\n\nAlso, we plan on running a story this Friday about the Crime Victims' Rights Act suit, and the Jane Does' proposed remedies. The alleged victims want the U.S. Attorney's Office to rescind the immunity provisions in the NPA, and to pursue a prosecution against Mr. Epstein and his co-conspirators. Can you comment on this?\n\nThanks so much!\n\nKate"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030519.txt_8560
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030519.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 1:48:24 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Details of the disturbing lifestyle led by Jeffrey Epstein emerged last night after the Daily\nMail uncovered logs of telephone messages left at his Florida child sex den.\n\nSchoolchildren were among hundreds of callers who apparently rang to arrange massages\nfor the 58-year-old billionaire friend of Prince Andrew, who was later convicted of child sex\noffences.\n\nGhislaine Maxwell, 49-year-old daughter of the disgraced media mogul Robert Maxwell, is\nnamed in several messages.\n\nIn one left for her or ‘Sarah’, a caller says she ‘doesn’t know at what time she must come\nthis night for the massage’. Other messages for Epstein, the sources of which are not clear,\ncontain such phrases as: ‘She has females for Mr JE’ and ‘I have a female for him’.\n\nAnother with sickening overtones comes from someone called Jeanluc for Epstein: “He just\ndid a good one — 18 years. (She spoke to me and said, “I love Jeffrey”’)’.\n\nThe long list of women is punctuated by regular references to Epstein’s celebrity friends\nincluding the business magnate Donald Trump, film producer Harvey Weinstein and\nmagician David Copperfield, referred to as ‘Magic David’.\n\nThe sheer volume of phone traffic shows the frequency of Epstein’s massages, many of\nwhich were ‘erotic’ and allegedly involved the abused girls.\n\nThe evidence is from documents confiscated by police during a criminal investigation into"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012041.txt_8561
source_file: IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012041.txt
subject:
  RE: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur

messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Dunlavey, Dean (©) <i", "Schecter, Danicl (CC) <>", "Viohcbbi, Ni >", "Ruemmler, Kathy (DC) < >>", "Cc: #L&W BD PR (US) <_< mailto:# >", "Wine, Jamie OY) <>", "euro, Nicole (NY) a >>", "Harris, Nicole (CH) | oo cies waa E>", "Bauer, Steve (SF-BR) <->", "M0072, Wendy (OC) a >", "Jennings, Alex (LA) < >", "Robins, Greg (LA) a"], "timestamp": "Thursday, Aug 11, 2016, 7:41 PM", "subject": "RE: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur", "body": "OC Business Journal article with a nice shout out to Dean:\n\nhttp://www.ocbj.com/news/2016/aug/12/jury-decides-against-sjc-firm/"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["#L&W BD PR (US)", "Wine, Jamie (NY)", "Bruno, Nicole (NY)", "Harris, Nicole (CH)", "Greenberg, Jeffrey (LA-NY)", "Bauer, Steve (SF-BR)", "Moore, Wendy (OC)", "Jennings, Alex (LA)", "Robins, Greg (LA)"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur", "body": "The LA Times appears to be the first media to report on the verdict. Latham references are highlighted:\nBUSINESS\nFederal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur<http://fw.to/aXv1QHI>\n\n[Farooq Bajwa]\nFarooq Bajwa\n\nBy Andrew Khouri\n\nAugust 11, 2016\n\nA federal jury decided Thursday that one of the Middle East’s most prominent banks did not commit fraud and\nsteal technology from an Irvine firm that sued it for half a billion dollars in damages after their partnership\ncollapsed.\n\nOrange County company InfoSpan had alleged that Emirates NBD ended a partnership for a mobile payment\nsystem because it didn’t want to share revenue and stole InfoSpan’s technology to launch its own service.\nThe Dubai-based bank, in turn, denied it stole or ever used InfoSpan’s technology. It argued that it cancelled\nthe partnership because InfoSpan couldn’t produce a working product and misled it into thinking it was an\nestablished company, not one with little to no track record.\n\nAfter deliberating for a day, the jury unanimously decided that InfoSpan did not prove its case of fraud and\ntheft of trade secrets.\n\nInfoSpan had asked for $540 million in damages. An attorney for InfoSpan declined to comment on the"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031607.txt_8566
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031607.txt
subject: Re: My review today in wsj of conspiracy theories
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ed a", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:36 PM", "subject": "They're Not Really Out to Get You", "body": "They're Not Really Out to Get You\n\nBy EDWARD JAY EPSTEIN\n\nDec. 18, 2015, Wall Street Journal\n\n|\n\nConspiracy, a word derived from the Latin “to breathe together,” has been a salient part of the darker side of\nrecorded history ever since some 60 conspirators in the Roman senate, including Brutus and Cassius, plotted\ntogether to assassinate Julius Caesar in 44 B.C. Nowadays the “C” word does not always sit well with\njournalists, who commonly employ it in conjunction with “theory” to describe paranoid distortions of reality.\n\nEven so, a criminal conspiracy is not a rare phenomenon. Not only was a foreign conspiracy responsible for the\nmonstrous 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center (as well as the previous attempt to blow it up in 1993) but,\naccording to the Center on Law and Security at Fordham University, over 90% of routine federal indictments\nfor terrorist attacks since 9/11 contain at least one conspiracy charge. The government's pursuit of conspiracies\nis by no means limited to terrorism. Conspiracy charges are the rule rather than the exception in cases brought\nagainst businessmen accused of fixing prices, evading environmental regulations, using insider information or\nlaundering money.\n\nBut there are also pseudo-conspiracies that exist only in a delusionary or misinformed mind. And some of\nthem achieve a huge following. In Pakistan, according to public opinion polls, a majority of the population\nbelieves that the 9/11 attack was staged by President George W. Bush to launch a war on Islam. The claim that\nthe 1969 moon landing was faked is still around. Just two days ago a crew from a Russian TV channel rushed\nto my apartment to interview me about a viral post on YouTube in which the deceased director Stanley\nKubrick supposedly made a deathbed confession to having filmed the landing in a Hollywood studio—even\nthough everything about the post, including a fake Kubrick, was untrue.\n\nWhy people believe in pseudo-conspiracies is the focus of Rob Brotherton's fascinating book “Suspicious\nMinds.” Mr. Brotherton, an academic psychologist, advances the thesis that the belief in pseudo-conspiracies\nproceeds from the “quirks and foibles” in the way that the human brain, or at least some human brains, process\nevidence. He lucidly reviews studies showing common defects in the brain's wiring, such as the bias that\nselects evidence to confirm rather than undermine a pre-adopted thesis. “We seek what we expect to find,” as\nMr. Brotherton puts it. Relatedly, “biased assimilation” causes us to “interpret ambiguous events in light of\nwhat we already believe.”\n\nDiscussing Richard Hofstadter's 1964 essay “The Paranoid Style in American Politics,” Mr. Brotherton\naccepts Hofstadter's characterization of proponents of politically motivated conspiracy theories as “paranoid”\nand suffering from “‘a psychic phenomenon” that prevents them from seeing the absurdity of their position. But\nhe disagrees with Hofstadter that this condition affects only a small number of people on the fringes of society.\nFor Mr. Brotherton, “conspiracy theories thrive in the mainstream.”\n\nUntil the controversy over the validity of Warren Commission's 1966 report on the Kennedy assassination, the\nphrase “conspiracy theory” had a more neutral meaning, suggesting a plausible yet unproven claim about\nmultiple actors in a single event. Only in the aftermath of the Warren Commission did it become a derogatory\nterm used to suggest theories that subvert conventional wisdom. To those who doubted the commission's\nfinding that a single gunman killed Kennedy, Earl Warren became, Mr. Brotherton’s says, the “figurehead in a"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ed"], "timestamp": "12/19/2015 2:28:32 PM", "subject": "Re: My review today in wsj of conspiracy theories", "body": "could 1 pay you to organzie my story into a coherent presentation. . probaly a six- 9 moth job."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032218.txt_8574
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032218.txt
subject: Tim Zagat
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jefffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/25/2018 8:15:47 PM", "subject": "Tim Zagat", "body": "Tim zagat would like to take you to dinner some time soon he says he is always in NY from Sunday night to wEd_and of course you are always invited to go see him in the country for dinner Thurs-sunday_he says he was in Paris for the past 2 weeks and had amazing dinners_He also wants to tell you about he dream he had about Trump!"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022258.txt_8590
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022258.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nadia", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 3:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you understand offset agreements? I got asked to be involved in negotiating some of the deals between Brazil and other countries in regards to the purchase of new fighter jets.. What is an offset service provider?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "brazil, has tried to buy fighters, in the past, they don't have a lot of money,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hmm, so the offset service provider does what - negotiation between the parties? Complex sounds interesting..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 11:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes but with a 2.2 billion dollar top. most planes are above 100 each, hence the issue"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025537.txt_8592
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025537.txt
subject: Re: poetry and science
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "12/2/2014 6:57:24 PM", "subject": "Re: poetry and science", "body": "sorry got called into conference can continue later in week"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:29 PM", "subject": "Re: poetry and science", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nApropos of our conversation of a few minutes ago, This proposal went to someone I thought was \ninterested in the environment and science but who seems, in fact, far more interested in supporting TV \non a broad range of topics. \n500,000 would fund this initiative as the second HGSE course (after Poetry of the City) and could begin \nimmediately, Jan 1.. I'd be thrilled to include other scientists you name, perhaps taping the group in a \nsession on metaphor at the edges of fields. \nINote that taped sessions already include economics, marine biology, astronomy, evolutionary biology, \nzoology, physics and computer science. Richard Dawkins, Walter Isaacson, David Mossberg and David \nMalan have all said yes to tapings. Footage for all the others is already shot and ready for post \nproduction. \nI am having a drink with Dean of Ed School today and can explore this with him among other topics \nLisa \nPoetry in America for Teachers II: The Poetry of Earth, Sea, and Sky \nCombining study of poetry with study of science, environment and the visual arts."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033243.txt_8598
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033243.txt
subject: Donald Trump Can’t Close Deal, Failing Salesman | National Review
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemm|er in", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/30/2017 3:11:00 PM", "subject": "Donald Trump Can’t Close Deal, Failing Salesman | National Review", "body": "http://amp.nationalreview.com/article/449988/donald-trump-cant-close-deal-fai ling-salesman?utm_source=PANTHEON_STRIPPED&utm_med i um=PANTHEON_STRI PPED&utm_campai gn=PANTHEON_STRIPPED"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028775.txt_8603
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028775.txt
subject: FW: RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade
messages:
  [{"sender": "elisabeth feliho", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake", "Bob Crowe"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, February 23, 2016 5:20 AM", "subject": "Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Dear Vinoda and Bob, \nPlease see attached the last version of the revised draft letter. We have made some modifications and amendments we submit to your proposal. You can finalize the letter as it suits you. We strongly recommend to wait Wednesday or Tuesday this week before sending the letter as Amnesty International will issue on Wednesday 24th February its worldwide report on human right situation. It is highly probable that major statement will be made on Mr. Wade case in the report on Senegal, which will give us more input for the letter. \nMany thanks and best regards. \nEF"}, {"sender": "Vinoda Basnayake", "recipients": ["elisabeth feliho"], "timestamp": "2016-02-26 13:04 GMT+00:00", "subject": "Re: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Great news, the piece was published in The Hill this morning- http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/internationa1/270878-senegals-democratic-backslide \nWe can share this w Congress and State."}, {"sender": "elisabeth feliho", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake"], "timestamp": "Monday, February 29, 2016 6:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Congratulations!!! Can we share this with the press here? \nBest regards. \nEF"}, {"sender": "Vinoda Basnayake", "recipients": ["elisabeth feliho"], "timestamp": "02/03/2016 16:20 (GMT+00:00)", "subject": "RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "We have had some positive feedback from the article. Now the issue certainly has more visibility in Washington. Bob is in the process of setting up the meeting with Tom at the State Dept regarding the Human Rights Report for 2016. Will send more as we get more details."}, {"sender": "abuulabass (Tidiane)", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake", "elisabeth feliho"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 02, 2016 12:31 PM", "subject": "RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Congratulations Vinoda ! The French version of the paper was published today in the Senegalese major newspapers. You can see it also in Seneweb.com. \nMany thanks for the good work with my best regards. \nTidiane"}, {"sender": "Bob Crowe", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/11/2016 12:24:18 PM", "subject": "FW: RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026263.txt_8605
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026263.txt
subject:
  Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO

messages:
  [{"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:18:09 -0500", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "should it have a christian component? tithe? if you form a church you may be able to tell mueller you have a confession privelege. :)"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "Populist/Nationalist first\n\nConservative Christians (catholic/evangelical) next\nReverse alabama\n\nThis coalition staves off \"times up\" for next decade plus"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:24:39 -0500", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "understood. but need details. money needed for think tank, for ads. for policy meetings. . though leaders. we could also make the coin in some instances non negotiable for 2 years. . is there a super smart FEC person. ?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "Yes...I've got the 2nd best--best is don mcegahn who is occupied currently"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Banno"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:31:40 -0500", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "BTW spent some time on the phone with Jide. hes looking to be read into Saudi. . too early"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/24/2018 1:32:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "Cool"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026980.txt_8606
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026980.txt
subject: Is France in decline?
messages:
  [{"sender": "digest-noreply@quora.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/23/2019 7:04:40 PM", "subject": "Is France in decline?", "body": "Jeffrey's Digest\nTop Stories For You\n\nIs France in decline?\nThierry Baudasse, Professor of Economics at Universite d'Orleans\nUpdated Jan 15\nWell, do you mean economically? If so, just watch this video, it’s just projections about the future made by University of Denver (Pardee Center for International Futures |...\n\nWhy doesn't Donald Trump like Tiffany Trump?\nAnthony Cady, studied at Grossmont College\nUpdated Jun 14\nIt isn’t that he doesn’t like Tiffany Trump. It’s that Marla Maples took custody of Tiffany when she and Trump split up and she has lived with Marla outside the glitz and g...\n\nIf 10^y=y^10, then what is y?\nNancy Mitchell\nUpdated Apr 30\nIf 10^y=y^10, then what is y?\nThe given equation is [math]10^y=y^{10}\\text{.}[/math].\nTake the tenth root of each side and get\n[math]\\pm(10^y)^{\\frac{1}{10}}=\\pm(y^{10})^{\\frac{1}{10}}=\\sqrt[10]{y^{10}} [/math]\n...\n\nAs a police officer, what is the most inappropriate thing someone ever did to get out of a ticket?\nPeter Michael, PE/IT Petroleum Engineering & Information Technology, University of Southwestern...\nWritten Dec 9, 2018\nRoutine Traffic stop for speeding, cute little red mustang stopped; When I got to the car window her top was down and her skirt hiked up and she was busy - She looks at me ...\n\nWhat is typical jail food?\nCarter, C/O (2017-present)\nWritten Jun 15\nI work in the local jail here. I haven’t been to any other facilities but apparently we feed our inmates very well compared to other counties.\nMorning: cereal with fruit or ...\n\nIn Japan, is it rude to leave a shop or restaurant without saying anything if you do not speak Japanese?\nShahriar Kabir Saki, knows Japanese\nWritten Feb 4, 2018\nIt’s funny how I had this exact question just a few months ago when I first arrived in Japan. So I asked my Japanese friend and he said that after finishing your meal or pa...\n\nWhen British Airways Flight 38 was about to crash short of the runway at Heathrow Airport, why did the pilot or first officer yell out \"speed bird, speed bird\" just before the crash?\nTom Quetchenbach, occasional flyer\nUpdated Jun 2\nSpeedbird is the callsign of British Airways, referring to the stylized bird logo.\nCaptain Peter Burkill of British Airways 38 explains his radio call, “Speedbird, Speedbird...\n\nWhat do Brits think of France?\nNate White, Drinks coffee. Writes copy.\nWritten Mar 1\nI’ll be honest. Right now, I’m pretty annoyed with France. We’re not really speaking.\nThe thing is, we’re supposed to be siblings. We’re supposed to be at each other’s throa...\n\nIs Chinese really the hardest language in the world to learn?\nSara Maria Hasbun, studied Linguistics at Columbia University\nWritten May 24\nShh, don’t tell anyone but…as a linguist, I can tell you that for English speakers, at least, Chinese is not considered the most difficult language to learn. In fact, I don...\n\nIf I sat down for dinner with Queen Elizabeth would she instantly know I was a common person by my etiquette? What would she notice first?\nPaul Rodgers, studied at City University London\nUpdated Mar 26\nThe most important rule the Queen follows is ‘Don’t embarrass your guests'.\nI have heard that at a dinner some years ago she noticed a man nearby was eating his peas while h..."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032595.txt_8608
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032595.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy. He would like to take all the credit. If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "are we meeting in new york?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now Ii"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "when is good for you? late thurs? fri lunch whatever you prefer."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 4:42:31 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032581.txt_8616
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032581.txt
subject: science in Trump time
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 2:46:08 AM", "subject": "science in Trump time", "body": "startup idea - marketplace where a scientist can find a donor. I realize what we've started. We've started a new PR campaign to engage donors to support science during Trump's time. It can be massive. And you can be a face of if it doesn't sound scary for you G But what I really like it's actually important and we are the first one who started thinking about it"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031230.txt_8617
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031230.txt
subject:
  Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN

messages:
  [{"sender": "Steven J. Hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Gary H. Baise", "Alan Fraade"], "timestamp": "July 13, 2016 at 6:26:21 AM EDT", "subject": "JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "SIR \nPRESIDENT TRUMP WILL KNOW THAT GARY BAISE IS WORKING ON THE NEEDED FOOD \nPOLICY POINTS OF FACT WITH THE FOOD INDUSTRY LEADERS . \nPRESIDENT TRUMP UNDERSTANDS THAT THE FOOD INDUSTRY IS VITAL TO THE TRUMP \nWHITE HOUSE POLICY. \nWHAT IS NEEDED IN THE PRESENTATION TO PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP WILL BE DON \nE BY OUR TEAM THAT NOW HAS THE KEY JOB AT THE STEVEN \nHOFFENBERG TRUMP SUPER PAC IN BUYING OVER $ 1 BILLION DOLLARS IN ADS & T \nHE HIRING OF THE BUS PROJECT TO GET OUT THE VOTE IN EVERY POOR AREA IN THE \nUSA. \nTHE POOR VOTER OVER 120 MILLION VOTERS THAT WERE DEMS ARE NOW VOTING FO \nR PRESIDENT TRUMP ON NOV 8 2016. \nT V EXPERTS DONT REPORT THE ABOVE DEMS POOR FOLKS THAT ARE VOTING FOR PR \nESIDENT TRUMP !!!!! \nTHE POOR VOTER WILL PUT PRESIDENT IN THE WHITE HOUSE IN THE 2016 RACE. \nOUR BUS PROJECT IS VITAL TO THE PRESIDENT TRUMP GET OUT THE VOTE IN NOVEM \nBER!!!!! \nJUDGE SWEET PLAYS THE KEY PART NOW IN THE TOWERS VICTIMS SUIT AGAINST \nJEFF EPSTEIN !!!! \nJEFF EPSTEIN HAS THE PICTURES OF BILL CLINTON HAVING SEX WITH THE UNDERAGE \nGIRLS !!!!!! \nBILL CLINTON & JEFF EPSTEIN BOTH HAD SEX WITH THE UNDERAGE GIRLS THAT ARE \nRECORDED BY JEFF EPSTEIN !!!!! \nJEFF EPSTEIN IS NOT IN FEDERAL PRISON ONLY BECAUSE JEFF EPSTEIN IS HOLDING TH \nE ABOVE PICTURES !!!!!! \nTHANK YOU SIR \nGO PRESIDENT TRUMP !!!!!"}, {"sender": "Steven J. Hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "July 13, 2016 at 4:45:18 AM PDT", "subject": "Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Bennet J. Moskowitz"], "timestamp": "7/13/2016 1:37:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033257.txt_8623
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033257.txt
subject: FYI
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/16/2017 5:12:25 PM", "subject": "FYI", "body": "September 24, 2017\n\nTrump's urging that some NFL players be fired could cost him 15 years\nin prison\n\nLegal Information Institute\n\n1. U.S. Code > Title 18 » Part | » Chapter 11 » § 227\n\n18 U.S. Code § 227 - Wrongfully influencing a private entity’s employment decisions by a\nMember of Congress or an officer or employee of the legislative or executive branch\ne US Code\n\ne Notes\n(a) Whoever, being a covered government person, with the intent to influence, solely\non the basis of partisan political affiliation, an employment decision or employment\npractice of any private entity—\n\n(1)\n\ntakes or withholds, or offers or threatens to take or withhold, an official act, or\n\n(2)\n\ninfluences, or offers or threatens to influence, the official act of another, shall be fined\nunder this title or imprisoned for not more than 15 years, or both, and may be\ndisqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.\n\n(b) In this section, the term “covered government person” means—\n\n(1)\n\na Senator or Representative in, or a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the\nCongress;\n\n(2)\n\nan employee of either House of Congress; or\n\n(3)\n\nthe President, Vice President, an employee of the United States Postal Service or the\nPostal Regulatory Commission, or any other executive branch employee (as such\nterm is defined under section 2105 of title 5, United States Code).\n\nI sent the Attn: Mueller re Trump crime to these journalists:\nAP John Rogers — on vacation\n\nNY Times"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031820.txt_8625
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031820.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": null, "body": "This morning the pricing is as follows:\n\nAug 200 Puts cost $4.10\nSept 200 Puts cost $7.90\n\nEarning are on 08/30. So worst case is the uncertainty lingers until then which would argue to buy the Sept puts.\nHowever | still prefer buying the Aug puts as | would fully expect more clarity from management before August expiry."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 7:11 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Im not angry, sorry, itissad. itis apparent that you have no experience trading. we both madeamistake. . the\nspy trades were the results of arank amatuer... youtook a postion on the direction of the market. ok. you\ndecided to play it extra short time and short. . why? becaue the options are cheaper. ? knowing full well that\ntime premium was running. . first silly move. . | allowed as promised to give you authority. . you seta target. . it\nhit the traget , you moved in back. based on media reporting on trump visit? you didnt act. the market dipped and\nyou panicked. . AMATEUR. wrong options wrong timing , no discipline and as a percentaage of investment. a one\nday dip fof 25%. wanting to buy the highter strike , is ok. but why the same month? why the same moment. why\nthe same index. . sorry. | have taught this for many years. and your gradeisanF. not one good move in\n\nmany. . rebroadcom. the crack happend inthe morning. options were higher. no alternative presented. no\nanalysis. , this is no way to manage money. | have lost a great deal of money hoping you would be able to do as\nyou promised you could. would.. Had youtoldme, jeffrey | d like to try anew job as a manager lets start slow |\ncanlearn. i would be less annoyed. you told me you had great confidence knew the risks and truly believed you\nwould be able to raise money .do well and prosper. ._ If it were not you, this would have ended months ago.. we\nshould work on a solution. not sure yet what shape it takes."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031556.txt_8636
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031556.txt
subject: Re: sorry
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 6:55 PM", "subject": "Re: sorry", "body": "I am really occupied with stuff here.. will see when I can get around to writing something.\nLMK"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 26, 2018, at 4:00 PM", "subject": "Re: sorry", "body": "no rush, this is not going away soon :)"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:05 PM", "subject": "Re: sorry", "body": "I had my call with the Bulletin, I am going to take a voluntary leave as Chair of the Board.. allowing me and them to make nice \nstatements about me and how the board appreciates me, has never had a complaint, how professional I am, and how they hope I will \nreturn after this has subsided.. The alternative was worse."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 26, 2018, at 4:06 PM", "subject": "Re: sorry", "body": "yikes"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/27/2018 12:09:48 AM", "subject": "Re: sorry", "body": "They claimed they had 1500 hits for their announcement about me and buzzfeed, which doesn't seem like a lot, \nbut they thought so, and they are getting pressure from various of their supporters and senior people.. this \nthree week thing may be true, but I wonder if I will ever really recover.. I wish they would indict Trump or \nsomething right now.."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030890.txt_8639
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030890.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Saturday, April 02, 2011 6:09 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "in paris„ emailed steve - no response yet„ you wanted me to meet someone here, I forgot who. . may 2 will be \nan eye opener . I read the vanity fair piece. . \nhttp ://www.thedailyb east. com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-j effrey-\nepsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I will email Steve and Lawerence. \nI am curious what you think about Vanity fair piece? \nHow the daily beast knows about that dinner with woody allen and the crew? \nWho would know that? Some of your employees?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Sunday, April 03, 2011 2:16 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "re vanity fair, paul seems imbalanced„ so many intricate computing details but fuzzy on reality. He seems like \na wife that has been divorced for a younger girl . re woody allen„ my fault„ Charlie rose was also there. he \nhas a big mouth.-- wasn't there a science person or someone that worked with consuelo that you thought \nintersting?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikoli", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/4/2011 12:16:17 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Agree. \nThe book is much worst — it is coming out April 19th. \nWill tell you more. \nTry Consuelo — I can't think of other people right now in Paris. Few that I might interest you are traveling. \nI am so being answering on Consuelo's emails that you are better off to contact her directly. \nSteve will know many interesting people in Paris. He has great circle there."}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030648.txt_8642
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030648.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 5:13:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think so."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in palm beach is roger here?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thought you might be interested in this--it's suddenly made me the only liberal-media guy with access to \nTrump circle. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-\nstrategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747  \nAnd.. .1 have a bit of an idea for you re media and Saudi friends."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032607.txt_8647
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032607.txt
subject: Re: Interview with Futurism
messages:
  [{"sender": "i vote", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "Jeffrey, https://futurism.com/ editor (fast-growing media about science with over 25M unique readers) would like to have an interview with you. Same topic: Trump's cuts on science and your philanthropy.\n\nWould you be open to talk to them?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017 at 11:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "great. when is good?\nare you coming to New York next week?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/11/2017 6:59:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "nice. should we coordinate it with Leslie? I\n\nI'd can join it too, I'm in NYC next week"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026764.txt_8661
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026764.txt
subject: G650 profit model
messages:
  [{"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Joseph Vinciguerra"], "timestamp": "10/23/2017 2:43:33 PM", "subject": "G650 profit model", "body": "You asked for this a while back. It's not particularly self-explanatory. Joe V reviewed it with Ruth Wimer and Dave Deyoe, our aviation and aviation tax counsel at MWE. Let either of us know if you'd like to go over it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "can you share?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "did anyone provide you with a biz plan that shows the proposal will generat a profit ?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Adding Internet and possibly changing cushions. I recommended we do it with the 4 year inspection in the spring, but haven't heard back from him. I think I talked him out of automating the divans. I agreed with what you said about that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "isnt he changing the cushions? etc and adding internet?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Ah yes."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "new depreciation rules proposed under trump"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean?\nOn depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can't use bonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive.\nAre you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure I follow that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen", "Melanie Spinel"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do with it/ ? where do you stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Melanie Spinel"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Thinking of switching from Jet Aviation to EJM. EJM is more expensive. Do you have a point of view?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028985.txt_8685
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028985.txt
subject: America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra
messages:
  [{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/8/2016 8:57:31 AM", "subject": "America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra", "body": "Since Woody was into the subconscious mind I thought I'd share this \nSee you at 3PM \nhttp://www.sfgate.com/opinion/chopra/article/America-s-Shadow-The-Real-Secret-of-Donald-J-7965248.php"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029325.txt_8688
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029325.txt
subject:
  Re: Jeffrey Epstein, Harvard and Science Magnate, Applauds Congress' Largest Bill for Melanoma - CNBC

messages:
  [{"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith", "jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/20/2014 2:46:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Jeffrey Epstein, Harvard and Science Magnate, Applauds Congress' Largest Bill for Melanoma - CNBC", "body": "We are pushing to help get this up but having Bill Clinton in the other is making it tough to pop anything other up. Check again in 8 hours"}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 20, 2014, at 9:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Jeffrey Epstein, Harvard and Science Magnate, Applauds Congress' Largest Bill for Melanoma - CNBC", "body": "Hi Tyler,\nSee the press release published this morning. Everyone's picking it up but don't see it on googles 1st page yet. Tough because Daily Mail has about 3 new articles out\nhttp://www.cnbc.com/id/101510498"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030674.txt_8693
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030674.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "brett ratner now. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:02 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Charlie rose is next"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:14 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Notice the date of the email"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "And?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 3:06 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Number? I have s truly funny one"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Bannon won...tax code fucks rich people"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:04 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "told you so"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Trump is going to fire mueller and republicans on hill won't do a thing"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "opinon or knowledge"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 1:50 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Would put us in a different place...may even rouse you into action"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how would he do it. rosenstein?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 2:07 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Don't snicker, make fun or call me a liberal douchebag...we are approaching public good vs evil in a fundamental way"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 11:21 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "shouldnt mueller just file sealed indicments against jared ivanka and junior? they would stay even if he were fired."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/2/2017 6:31:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yup"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018158.txt_8696
source_file: IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018158.txt
subject: Re: Gps GTX Smart Shoe
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayer)"], "timestamp": "9/22/2011 10:19:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Gps GTX Smart Shoe", "body": "we will have dinnner at 8 ,, you can bring your maldives friend or anyone else. (no women ). we should\nspend an hour together just the two of us. today tomorrow:? It is always fun to see you"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024419.txt_8697
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024419.txt
subject: Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview
messages:
  [{"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/8/2013 9:02:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "SUIT just engaged. I meant shirley"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 15:49:51 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "shirley or your wife"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 15:16:44 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "great. place.. when will you go.. did you get married? im between alber and santa fe,, zorrro ranch, you can google earth it."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 14:58:01 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "I already rad it. congragulations hope to see you soon"}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "You ok? I became friendly with shirley maclaine last year and went to her ranch in sante fe. I may go back and remembered you own half the ranch land there or something. Do you still like it there?"}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "Bill Siegel hopes this might be of interest to you: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/jamie-glazov/the-control-factor-our-struggle-to-see-the-true-threat/\n\nThe Control Factor: Our Struggle to See the True Threat"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030733.txt_8704
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030733.txt
subject:
  Re: ‘You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,’ Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President’s Grip on GOP

messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 21 Jul 2018 05:52:00 -0400", "subject": "Re: ‘You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,’ Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President’s Grip on GOP", "body": "https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/20/politics/china-cold-war-us-superpower-influence/index.html"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/21/2018 11:40", "subject": "Re: ‘You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,’ Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President’s Grip on GOP", "body": "So epic---world coming our way"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033082.txt_8705
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033082.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 6:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not confidence inspiring"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "but -accurate"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I blame the plutocracy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 8:59 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty of blame. mostly the feminists"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 9:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Careful, or the pendulum is going to swing hard the other way and feminists will be in charge of everything"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 1:16:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i was kidding"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030408.txt_8726
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030408.txt
subject: Re: Reuters: China defends Iran business ties after Trump threat
messages:
  [{"sender": "Anders Corr", "recipients": ["Fanell's Red <fanell-red-star-rising>"], "timestamp": "August 8, 2018 at 5:32:57 AM EDT", "subject": "Reuters: China defends Iran business ties after Trump threat", "body": "From Reuters News:\n\nChina defends Iran business ties after Trump threat\nhttp://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-china/china-defends-iran-business-ties-after-trump-threat-idUSKBN1IKTOTU\n\nChina's business ties with Iran are open, transparent and lawful, its foreign ministry said on Wednesday, after U.S. President Donald Trump said companies doing business with Iran would be barred from the United States."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re: Reuters: China defends Iran business ties after Trump threat", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "8/8/2018 3:08:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters: China defends Iran business ties after Trump threat", "body": "https://www.klearwaterstore.com/davey-bt14-30-torrium2-booster-pump/?gclid=CjwKCAjwhqXbBRAREiwAucoo-6Wkrv3ZIfgAkk86XcrX9OzIV-2dsIdyWpJWa04IlskPP9fCr7-zUfxoCXUoQAvD_BwE passing along not covered >?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029866.txt_8730
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029866.txt
subject: U.S. celebrates Fourth of July, Trump-Kim DMZ meeting and Hong Kong protests
messages:
  [{"sender": "editorialstaff@flipboard.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/6/2019 6:57:33 PM", "subject": "U.S. celebrates Fourth of July, Trump-Kim DMZ meeting and Hong Kong protests", "body": "Plus, census citizenship question fight continues, USWNT heads to Women's World Cup finals and Coco Gauff makes Wimbledon history.\n\nBiggest news stories from the past week.\n\nWith Flyovers and Flags, Trump Plays M.C. for the Fourth\nnytimes.com / MICHAEL D. SHEAR WASHINGTON — In a made-for-television Independence Day production starring America’s military weaponry, President Trump on Thursday used the Lincoln… read more\n\nNorth Korea says U.S. 'hell-bent on hostile acts' despite wanting to talk\nreuters.com / by Michelle Nichols UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - North Korea’s mission to the United Nations accused the United States on Wednesday of being “more and more hell-bent on… read more\n\nTrump Weighs Executive Order to Add Citizenship Question to Census\nbloomberg.com / Justin Sink, Andrew M Harris, Bob Van Voris President Donald Trump said he may issue an executive order to add a question on citizenship to the 2020 census as the administration considers … read more\n\nTrump warns Iran nuclear threats will 'come back to bite you'\ntheguardian.com / Guardian staff and Agence France-Presse Donald Trump has warned Iran to be “careful with threats” as they can “come back to bite you” in response to Tehran’s vow that it will exceed within… read more\n\nArrests made over Hong Kong protests, legislature break-in\napnews.com / JOHNSON LAI HONG KONG (AP) — Police said they had arrested 13 people after the protests on Monday’s anniversary of Hong Kong’s return to China, including one man… read more\n\nActing DHS chief orders immediate investigation into offensive posts allegedly written by Border Patrol agents\ncnn.com / Priscilla Alvarez, CNN (CNN) — Acting Department of Homeland Secretary Kevin McAleenan has ordered an immediate investigation into offensive posts \"that allegedly includes… read more\n\nHouse Democrats sue for Trump's tax returns\npolitico.com / BRIAN FALER House Democrats on Tuesday sued for President Trump’s tax returns, marking the beginning of a high-stakes legal fight over his efforts to keep his taxes… read more\n\nCori 'Coco' Gauff, 15-year-old American, storms back for another Wimbledon upset\nusatoday.com / Scott Gleeson The 15-year-old American pulled off another huge upset Friday, this one in a third-round thriller that saw her come back to beat Slovenian Polona Hercog… read more\n\nAlex Morgan and Alyssa Naeher lead U.S. women to 2-1 victory over England in World Cup semis\nnbcnews.com / David K. Li The defending champs are now one victory away from hoisting the trophy for a fourth time. Alex Morgan celebrated her 30th birthday Tuesday by scoring a… read more\n\nEuropean leaders back German Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen to be first female European Commission president\nwashingtonpost.com / Quentin Ariès, Michael Birnbaum BRUSSELS — European leaders on Tuesday proposed awarding the powerful presidency of the European Commission to German Defense Minister Ursula von der… read more\n\nCheck out The Daily Edition for the biggest stories in news, business, tech, sports and entertainment.\n\nREAD MORE"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032998.txt_8732
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032998.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "5/10/2017 2:29:16 AM", "subject": null, "body": "http://www.foxnews.com/real-estate/2017/05/08/trump-looking-to-unload-caribbean-beach-estate.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019394.txt_8735
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019394.txt
subject: JEFFREY EPSTEIN; RESTITUTION
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Miami", "PB2/West Palm Beach RA", "Contact: SA"], "timestamp": "11/09/2006", "subject": "JEFFREY EPSTEIN; RESTITUTION", "body": "Synopsis: Request that SA receive holiday pay on November 10, 2006, Veteran's Day, a Federal Holiday.\n\nDetails: SA will be working on gathering data for the Intelligent Analyst that will be coming to the Palm Beach RA on Monday."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033096.txt_8741
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033096.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjgn Jagland"], "timestamp": "son. 24. jun. 2018 kl. 15:18", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it is not complex. he must be seen to get\n\nI think you might suggest to putin, that lavrov , can get insight on talking to me. vitaly churkin used to\n. but he died. ? !"}, {"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland [it.]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 3:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I’ll meet Lavrovs assistant on Monday and will suggest\n\nThank you fo a lovely evening. I’Il com to un high level week"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjgn Jagland"], "timestamp": "6/24/2018 1:59:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "churkin was great. he understood trump after our conversations.\n\nsomething _ its that simple."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030727.txt_8742
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030727.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "On my way to Munich\nWeekend going to Russia to World Cup Final."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "12 Jul 2018, at 12:44", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my assistant J also going. you guys are nuts. . are you flying comercial? bannon and trump in\nlondon. fun"}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 6:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have I been trained by you to fly commercial ?? What do you think ??\nIam in London tomorrow and can have Tea with Bannon - but I guess he’s got better things to do...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "12 Jul 2018, at 12:53", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ill ask, hes pretty swamped. . if there is any help you can give to in russia id appreciate it. . dont\nknow parties. ride tolondon . shesa futbol nut. . deutsch bank getting interesting soon."}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/12/2018 11:03:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Death of chinese shareholder quite an issue. What can we do with Qataris here?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032768.txt_8747
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032768.txt
subject: Your buddies!
messages:
  [{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/10/2018 9:20:41 PM", "subject": "Your buddies!", "body": "Maggie Haberman_ @maggieNYT 9m _ \nSome news - Dershowitz has been at the White House for part of today as Trump seeks his input, and he's \nsupposed to have dinner with the president tonight, per WH sources \n2."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031411.txt_8752
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031411.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeevacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2010 8:53:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Imagine exactly the opposite ? Appetizers 20, salad pasta dishes meat dishes fist dishes cheeses chocolates teas\nnuts olives hummus breads cakes pastry sorbet ice-cream juices fruits\n\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2010, at 9:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I now refer to my most recent trip as that mad adventure. The Arabian Stallion I rode across the desert had 2 speeds. Fast and faster.\nOh, did I mention his name was Obama? My hands are still clamped shut from trying to hold him! I didn't see a lick of water or a loo\nfor a week and sand, even after 12 showers, is still coming out of places I did not know existed! The food...well what can one say\nabout a piece of flat bread and some warm goats milk? The sleeping arrangements were deeply dodgy - shared a three sided Bedouin\ntent with a host of strangers, with not so much as a lamp for light, whilst freezing to death in the night air and simultaneously\nchoking whilst inhaling swirls of sand from the nightly storms. The nadir was being propositioned by a toothless Arab who lit the fire\nand helped feed the horses to a tumble around the bushes during a bedouin night story telling moment..Does that give you a picture?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033310.txt_8764
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033310.txt
subject: LinkedIn's Hoffman Offers $5 Million for Trump's Tax Returns
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/13/2016 5:36:29 PM", "subject": "LinkedIn's Hoffman Offers $5 Million for Trump's Tax Returns", "body": "http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-12/1inkedin-s-hoffman-offers-5-million-for-trump-s-tax-returns"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030420.txt_8765
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030420.txt
subject: Re: Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Hanson", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 9 2011 01:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hey. Just landed from LA. You around for a call- no rush- when ur free /tell me\nHope your ok\nXxX00"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Hanson"], "timestamp": "Tue Mar 08 15:32:12 2011", "subject": "Re: Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html>\n\nby Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky-ward>\n\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“I’ve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been. You will never think the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that focused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, Iam so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033304.txt_8772
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033304.txt
subject: Jared Kushner: The Donald Trump I Know I I Observer
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/6/2016 8:12:44 PM", "subject": "Jared Kushner: The Donald Trump I Know I I Observer", "body": "Importance: High\nhttp://observer.com/2016/07/jared-kushner-the-donald-trump-i-know/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030434.txt_8773
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030434.txt
subject: John Humphrys: The Terrier of Today, in conversation with Justin Webb
messages:
  [{"sender": "Intelligence Squared [info@intelligencesquared.com]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/9/2019 6:31:56 AM", "subject": "John Humphrys: The Terrier of Today, in conversation with Justin Webb", "body": "John Humphrys: The Terrier of Today, in conversation with Justin Webb\n\nJohn Humphrys:\nThe Terrier of Today"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025906.txt_8774
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025906.txt
subject: Fwd: Follow up
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/27/2016 4:34:42 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Follow up", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["Immelt, Stephen J. 1.11Mill"], "timestamp": "February 27, 2016 at 8:07:42 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Hi Steve, \nI am still intrigued and would like to meet Michael. I thinks it makes sense, though, for us to have a more \nspecific conversation about compensation before I meet with him. I don't want to put the cart before the horse, \nbut as I mentioned, this would be a big move for me, and it would have to make sense economically in addition \nto being the right move for other reasons we have discussed. \nI hope you are well. Cannot believe that Christie endorsed Trump! \nBest, \nKathy"}, {"sender": "Immelt, Stephen J.", "recipients": ["Kathy"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2016, at 5:23 AM", "subject": "Follow up", "body": "Kathy \nI don't want to pester you, but in the hope that you are still intrigued, I wanted to suggest that we try to set up an \nopportunity for you to meet Michael Davison, our global head of litigation. MIchael is an International \nArbitration specialist based in London and a key player. He is also a lot of fun, notwithstanding his Scottish \nupbringing. \nLet me know. \nBest, \nSteve"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031026.txt_8793
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031026.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Dear Professor Krauss,\n\nWe met briefly after your talk in Ithaca a few months ago — I'm the girl on The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. I've really enjoyed your talks and books, but I was surprised to see you quoted in the Daily Beast recently defending Jeffrey Epstein:\n\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/\n\nCan you confirm if the following quote is accurate?\n\n\"If anything, the unfortunate period he suffered has caused him to really think about what he wants to do with his money and his time, and support knowledge,\" says Krauss. \"Jeffrey has surrounded himself with beautiful women and young women but they're not as young as the ones that were claimed. As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.\" Though colleagues have criticized him over his relationship with Epstein, Krauss insists, \"I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.\"\n\nThanks,\nRebecca Watson"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "yes it is.. Based on my direct experience with Jeffrey, which is all I can base my assessment on, he is a thoughtful, kind, considerate man who is generous to his friends, and all of the women I have known who have been associated with Jeffrey speak glowingly in the same words..\n\n1 why are you asking?"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with Jeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peopleI know and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of. I know it is not politically correct to say that, because in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of the young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, and I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence KraussE"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:55:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no i am in paris thanks"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021235.txt_8794
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021235.txt
subject: Re: My Wall Street 2 Story
messages:
  [{"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Wrote this for the February issue of AVENUE Magazine. Thought it would amuse you. Tell me what you think of it. \nxoxo Peggy\n\nHD: Wall Street, Take Two\nDEK: In the upcoming sequel to Oliver Stone's groundbreaking film, Gordon Gekko gets out of jail and back to business. Peggy Siegal takes us behind the scenes where she got herself on camera along with a few of her famous friends. Nice work if you can get it."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "1/12/2010 12:28:25 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "terrific. i want to hear more about the trip"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019343.txt_8795
source_file: IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019343.txt
subject: Re: Fw:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon qq", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon qq"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:58 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Hicks?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 02:02:16 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "If you are going to play here , you’ll have to spend time , europe by remote doesn’t work . Lots and lots of face time and hand holding"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 6:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "its doable , but time consuming, there are many leaders of countries we can organize for you to have one on ones. however. you will have to come, stay 8-10 days. , then no more than two weeks later. the same. The fear is that you gin up their hopes and emotions and then abandon them. I think you want to be an insider, not an outsider flying in and out. did you get the first cut of american carnage? .?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon 4", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Agree 100%\n\nHow do I do that???\n\nAmerican Carnage amazing -- Ari Emmanual financed it and he loves it---Erolls besties tell him it will end his career because he gave a platform to a monster\n\nOfficially in Venice , Toronto and New York Film Festival\nSkipping telluride"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 9:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "We can talk about at your convenience"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon qq", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "7/23/2018 3:32:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "available now?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033489.txt_8799
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033489.txt
subject: Cuba trip
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke", "Rich Kahn"], "timestamp": "9/16/2017 7:57:47 PM", "subject": "Cuba trip", "body": "Jeffrey \nI've contact universal ref Cuba trip: \nAttached is current form they are utilizing,. \nSee note from UVAir below: \nHello Larry, \nThis year we have had quite a few successful Cuba trips with clients over the past year or so that Cuba \ntravel has resumed. Attached are the rules and regulations that we currently operate under. \nKeep in mind on 16 Jun 2017, President Donald Trump has announced changes that are to come regarding \nCuban and us relations. This means the regulations are being rewritten to reflect these changes and are \nto be published 30-90 days from that date. We do not have advance notice on how the regulations will be \nwritten or exactly how it will affect our Cuba licensing but we are sure they will have some impact on \nus \nUntil further notice we are still utilizing the attached information. I will keep an eye out for updates \non Cuba restrictions; however, we should start the process as we have in the past. \nWe will need the following documents form you: \n1. In the attached document on page number 10 there is a \"cubia BIS Certification Form\" we will need this \nfilled out by the PIC for the trip. This is a self-authorization form for the aircraft and should be kept \non file after the trip in case the Department of Treasury asks for it in the future. \n2. We will also need the \"Passenger certification\" form for each passenger on board. They will need to \nadvise purpose of travel under section 1. If they do not fall under any of those then they will need a \nspecific license from the Department of Treasury. \nAfter we receive the above documents for the aircraft and passengers we can start arranging handing and \nlanding permits for the trip. \nThank you, \nWilliam McLendon \nSenior Mission Advisor \nTrip Support Services \nUniversal weather and Aviation, Inc"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033041.txt_8804
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033041.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Anas Alrasheed <anasalrasheed@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today .. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in new york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Anas Alrasheed"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the book worked. :)"}, {"sender": "Anas Alrasheed <anasalrasheed@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thnx jeff ..im prayingpiabid"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Anas Alrasheed"], "timestamp": "9/20/2017 10:34:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your watch turned out to be a truly great investment :)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031388.txt_8812
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031388.txt
subject: Fwd: Herald
messages:
  [{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg [owlmgw@att.net]", "Weingarten, Reid Lilly Ann Sanchez"], "timestamp": "3/5/2019 11:19:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Herald", "body": "hiyicitens arvana eer ee re er Ser Re re Se Ce Lr Re Sr Ce a a Ce Te ee Ce re rll"}, {"sender": "Lilly Sanchez", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Herald", "body": "Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case\n\nPlay Video\n\nDurationA 3:51\nAG nominee Barr pledges to look into handling of Epstein case\n\nSen. Ben Sasse questioned attorney general nominee William Barr about the Jeffrey Epstein case on January 15,\n2019, getting the nominee to commit to having the Department of Justice look into the handling of that case if\nconfirmed. C-SPAN Meta Viers\n\nBY JULIE K. BROWN\n\njbrown@miamiherald.com\n\nO00CO0O\n\nJust days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department has reassigned the Jeffrey Epstein victims’ rights\ncase to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Atlanta, the attorneys representing Epstein’s victims’ attorneys said\n\nTuesday.\n\nMiami federal prosecutors, in letter to attorneys for the victims’s lawyers on Monday, said they had recused\n\nthemselves from the case, according to Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, representing Epstein’s victims."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027050.txt_8813
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027050.txt
subject: AW: AW: NY plane
messages:
  [{"sender": "Magdalena Schuster", "recipients": ["Kevin Frost"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 03, 2012 1:04", "subject": "AW: AW: NY plane", "body": "Hi Kevin,\n\nattached please find an information sheet about the AIDS Solidarity Gala — I am sure Jeffrey will very much enjoy the Gala.\n\nI’ve also included the auction items at the Gala for your and Jeffrey’s information.\n\nLet me know how I can be of further assistance.\n\nAll the best,\nLena"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031740.txt_8825
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031740.txt
subject: My Prediction Coming True
messages:
  [{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/20/2017 9:59:21 PM", "subject": "My Prediction Coming True", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 20, 2017 at 8:08:09 AM PDT", "subject": "My Prediction Coming True", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026228.txt_8828
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026228.txt
subject: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E.", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hello Jeffrey —\n\nI hope all is well with you. As per Peggy Siegal's office, I have included here the invitation to the IFP Gotham Awards ceremony, which will be held on Monday, November 27 at Cipriani Wall Street in New York City.\n\nThis year's ceremony is going to be another successful event. We couldn't be more thrilled with this year's impressive group of Tributees. The Actress Tribute will go to Nicole Kidman and the Actor Tribute to Dustin Hoffman. The Director Tribute will be given to Sofia Coppola, with the Cinematographer Tribute going to Ed Lachman. With the Industry Tribute, we will be honoring Jason Blum, founder of Blumhouse Productions. And we simply couldn't be more pleased to honor Vice President Al Gore with this year's special Humanitarian Tribute. With nominees this year ranging from Willem Dafoe, Adam Sandler and Robert Pattison to Margot Robbie, Lois Smith and Mary J. Bilge, this year's ceremony looks to be the most star studded ever.\n\nPlease let me know if you have any questions.\n\nBest regards,\nSteven"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:38 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Jeffrey —\n\nSounds good. Thanks so much for confirming. If you or someone in your office could provide the information below, I can send along an invoice and contribution letter for your $10K donation toward the chairs.\n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable):\nCONTACT NAME:\nADDRESS LINE 1:\nADDRESS LINE 2:\n\nMany thanks.\n\nBest,\nSteven"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:40 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "just send to peggy. you her co. its better for her"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E.", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Sounds good, works for me.\n\nSo, Peggy, if you could just let me know what info to include on the donation letter and invoice, I'll send that along your way.\n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable):\nCONTACT NAME:\nADDRESS LINE 1:\nADDRESS LINE 2:\n\nThanks,\nSteven"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer"], "timestamp": "11/20/2017 8:09:46 PM", "subject": "RE: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Dear Steven,\nSee below:\n\njeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]\nCompany Name: The Peggy Siegal Company\nContact Name: Peggy Siegal\nAddress: 750 Lexington Avenue 5th Floor New York, New York 10022.\n\nBest,\nRebecca"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014313.txt_8829
source_file: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014313.txt
subject: Financials trade for Monday
messages:
  [{"sender": "Amanda Ens", "recipients": ["jeffrey E.", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, November 11, 2016 4:04 PM", "subject": "Financials trade for Monday", "body": "It’s not too late to buy financials as a medium term trade. They’ve run up a lot this week but we’re getting\nendless calls from generalists asking which banks to buy — there is still more upside to the sector. Banks also\nprovide some offset to your bonds if interest rates continue to move. Our financials sector specialist thinks XLF\ncould have another 20-25% upside given its many levers to the Trump trade: less regulation, higher interest\nrates/steeper yield curve, higher vol, economic growth, etc. The regional banks are asset sensitive and more of a\npure play on a rates move but we view the larger cap banks as having even more upside to the Trump Trade\ngiven the above points.\n\nBuy an XLF 17March2017 call spread:\n° Buy the 105% call / sell a 110% call with a 115% at-expiry knock-in\n° Total premium: 1.75%\n\nAll eyes are on Sunday’s 60 Minutes interview with Trump. Market is pricing that all regulations will be rolled\nback (very optimistic). Any hint that this is not true could lead to pullback on Monday.\n\nNote on tech: we’re seeing FANG used as a source of funds with the rotation from growth into value. There’s\nalso the tax read-through: tech is already relatively tax advantaged @ 22%; Industrials are at 30%, Financials at\n29%. Next year, tech could benefit from a repatriation tax holiday but that is viewed as more of a Q1/Q? trade.\n\nMore thoughts on financials:\n\nWith respect to the economy, the market is certainly indicating that there will be a large fiscal stimulus which\nmay send US growth higher and that’s a good thing for financials for a wide variety of reasons, from\nemployment to wages to loan growth and credit quality (even if somewhat offset by higher rates). It does\nremain to be seen exactly how much of this expected policy actually gets done, but at the moment, investors are\nwilling to take a certain amount of growth on faith.\n\nSo those are positives for financials before we even discuss regulation. The move in the financials since the\nelection would seem to indicate that investors have concluded that nearly every piece of financial regulation\nwill get put into a shredder on day one of the new administration. The incoming administration has fueled that\nwith comments about rolling back pieces (or more) of Dodd-Frank in particular. I can see making the case for\nthat to the American public by saying that banks need less regulation in order to get more capital flowing into\nthe economy to drive growth. Not only does that mean that the E is likely too low (meaning that the P/E is not\nas high as it seems) but it could help improve ROE’s as well which could increase the multiple of that higher E\ninvestors are willing to pay. Note that while ROEs could go higher, it’s unlikely that they can get back to the\npeaks..."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027044.txt_8830
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027044.txt
subject: Trump promises to host Italian prime minister Giuseppe Conte at White House to honor him
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/10/2018 12:23:04 PM", "subject": "Trump promises to host Italian prime minister Giuseppe Conte at White House to honor him", "body": "https://ww.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/687949002\n\nIt Begins"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033055.txt_8840
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033055.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trtump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with mueller?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 7:03:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it also includes barrack, saying not is only donald crazy but hes stupid. SO MCH FUN"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026075.txt_8852
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026075.txt
subject: Re: NYT
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["chbarak"], "timestamp": "14 Apr 2017, at 16:06", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "column-middle-span-\nregion&pgType=Homepage&action=click&mediald=thumb_square&state=standard&contentPlacement=6&ver\nsion=internal&contentCollection=www.nytimes.com&contentId=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F20\n17%2F04%2F 13%2Ftheater%2Foslo-broadway-review.html&eventName=Watching-article-click"}, {"sender": "chbarak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "14 Apr 2017, at 19:24", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nI'm in Serengeti, Tanzania\n\nNo real communication. Cannot open the NYT article. But to judge from the article's title they are at least\nexaggerating if not totally wrong. This attack will not change strategy in a major way on either side. It will\nhowever raise respect for DJT in Moscow and few other capitals. That's not necessarily bad, if the WH won't\nread this change as a precedent which calls to be repeated too often.\n\nBest\n\nEB"}, {"sender": "ehbarak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/30/2017 4:38:23 PM", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nAbout time for our actions to turn into theatre and movie pieces.\nShall we talk? Any news from BC/AdR?\n\nBest\n\nEB"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030385.txt_8869
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030385.txt
subject: Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump News Conference Gets the ‘S.N.L.’ Treatment
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Glenn Dubin"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 15 2017 02:16 PM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump News Conference Gets the ‘S.N.L.’ Treatment", "body": "saw it loved it"}, {"sender": "Glenn Dubin", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:10 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump News Conference Gets the ‘S.N.L.’ Treatment", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2017/ 01/15/arts/donald-trump-saturday-night-live.html? smprod=nytcore-ipad\n&smid=nytcore-ipad-share\n\nThe actor Alec Baldwin, in a parody of Mr. Trump’s first news conference as president-elect, began by vowing\nto answer what he said was “the question that’s on everyone’s mind.”"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030462.txt_8870
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030462.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 08:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thank you Vicky!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:31 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html> by Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky-ward> March 8,2011 2:30 PM \"I've got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I've just been. You will never think the same way about anything again.\" So spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment as the alleged \"procurer\" of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal. I wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called \"The Talented Mr. Epstein.\" It was largely a business piece that focused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million. The piece alluded to Epstein's great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn't really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers. This is not to say I didn't hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself. Bizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept running into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of young women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. \"Do they speak?\" I remember asking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. \"Not like you, Vicky,\" was his riposte. I remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn't studied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at home via messenger. It was a book: \"Math for idiots.\" So he is not without humor, even though he doesn't drink or smoke, and hates restaurants. \"Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,\" newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He was certainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few moments in his company and you know this to be true. When I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that \"Andy\"—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his strange title is. Because if one thing's for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what he's talking about far more than \"Andy\" does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other financiers hang out with him. And Ghislaine? Full disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It's almost impossible not to. She is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I've spent hours talking to her about the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is curious. She has spent weeks at the bottom of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent me a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away almost anyone else's I can think of—probably even Rupert Murdochs'. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for hours. She is passionate about Bill Clinton with whom she is close friends. Yet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-Platero, (known fondly to her close friends as \"the Tennis Goddess\") Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When it comes down to things she really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her vulnerability. And that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey. \"He saved her,\" I remember a close friend of mine telling me. \"When her father died, she was a wreck; inconsolable. And then Jeffrey took her in. She's never forgotten that—and never will.\" In many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect replacement for her father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his sexual pecadillos, but then Ghislaine's father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving a massive \"black hole\" he'd fraudulently created. To Ghislaine, Jeffrey's habits may not have seemed that strange. In fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful people in the end either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl issues, and moved countries to avoid paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You don't tend to get to the top by being the world's most balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett didn't quite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second \"wife\" for many years whose existence he has been open about. So what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven't spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her loyalty to friends like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she'll be out and about as always. Look at Waksal and Stewart. No one sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up for all sorts of blemishes."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025226.txt_8883
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025226.txt
subject: On today's financial market developments
messages:
  [{"sender": "US GIO [us.gio@jpmorgan.com]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients:"], "timestamp": "8/4/2011 11:41:48 PM", "subject": "On today's financial market developments", "body": "This is a little unorthodox, but here is the text of an internal note that I just sent to our integrated Private Bank client coverage teams a few moments ago. Mary thought it would be a good idea to share this with our clients given the events of the day.\n\n“Here is what I plan to say at our Aspen Insights conference tomorrow about today’s events. The last two weeks have been a severe setback for financial markets and the global recovery.\n\n[1] Today, Italian equity markets sold off sharply and were eventually shut down after the ECB (for now) rejected being the buyer of last resort for Italian government bonds, as the markets were hoping. The Bundesbank apparently has objections to the idea. This is a problem: Italy has issued around as much public debt as Germany, but is a considerably smaller country with almost twice the debt load as a percentage of its GDP. Absent a decision by Germany to move to Federalism or a lot more debt monetization by the ECB, the European Monetary Union (as it is currently configured) could be facing its final stretch. Today’s reported move by Italian regulators to seize documents at Moody’s regarding declines in Italian bank stocks is an indication of the pressure the system is under, and the possible search for scapegoats. I don’t think you will find a firm that has written more often and more direly about the structural inconsistencies of the EMU than we have (I have a 2-year bibliography of what we said and when, if anyone wants it). The “Sick Men of Europe” paper from February 2010 and “Don Quixote Thanksgiving” from November 2010 go into the greatest detail on why. Our concerns sky-rocketed upon Greece’s financial disclosures in November 2009, after which we took portfolio decisions to back that up, purging exposures to the GIPSI countries from our credit, government bond and equity portfolios. Since early 2010, our underweight positions in Europe represent the largest regional underweights we have ever held.\n\n[2] Will there be another recession in the US? Our friend Marty Feldstein at Harvard puts the odds at 50-50. Sell side and buy side economists missed last month’s US economic rollover by a country mile, so I am not sure how much weight to put in their current forecasts. Most summarily dismissed our concerns that the recovery earlier this year had elements of a stimulus-driven mirage. Bridgewater Associates was the only firm we spoke to that consistently highlighted the broader process of household deleveraging; and cautioned that when stimulus faded, so would the US economy, given the weakness in household income. Their insights have been invaluable to us in terms of not stepping into this and taking too much risk prematurely during the three market swoons this year. Our central scenario for the US in 2012 is not another recession, but low growth in the 2.0% range, which is enough of a problem given the low job creation that entails. Note that the CBO assumes growth rates of 3.0% to 3.6% over the next few years in their analyses of future US federal debt levels.\n\n[3] Do not blame today’s events on the debt ceiling debate, US politicians or European regulators. If we get to the point where economic and profit fundamentals in a given market or region are not sustainable on their own, then we should be underweight that region (as in Europe). Owning an asset class under the assumption that there will always be a “Lord of the Flies” type rescue from Central Banks and Treasuries is very risky, and historically, fraught with failure. I remember similar logic in the summer of 1998, when the accepted mantra was that the US would bail out Russia and Boris Yeltsin, since President Clinton would not want to see a nuclear power like Russia slide back into Soviet rule, or anarchy (that view turned out to be wrong). Anyone market-weight European risk out of the expectation that “Trichet and Merkel will fix surely it” is taking a binary risk that impossible to handicap. Similarly, we should not start buying anything just because we think Qe3 is coming in the US (in the form of securities purchases, a permanently controlled long bond, etc).\n\n[4] When we began this year, I made the following decision: we would risk underperforming if there was a strong equity rally, out of concerns about the macroeconomic landscape (weakness in the West, inflation in the East). As a result, we have held less equity exposure than usual for a period of high margins, low P/E multiples and strong earnings. Instead, we’ve held larger exposures to investment grade and high yield credit, and hedge funds. Over the last couple of years, our hedge funds (long-short funds with low net positions, macro hedge funds, distressed credit) have"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029899.txt_8896
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029899.txt
subject: Fwd: idea for jefferey e.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kelly Friendly <kelly.friendly@example.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence H. Summers"], "timestamp": "January 7, 2015 at 5:01:26 PM PST", "subject": "idea for jefferey e.", "body": "Perhaps you should suggest Jefferey talk to Joe Lockhart at the Glover Park Group. He has helped Clinton and General Petraeus. Joe is great and he likes you a lot. LMK if you want to reach out to him. He is an old friend...."}, {"sender": "Lawrence H. Summers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:26 PM", "subject": "Fwd: idea for jefferey e.", "body": "Not terrible idea."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "1/8/2015 3:11:21 PM", "subject": "Fwd: idea for jefferey e.", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026049.txt_8899
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026049.txt
subject: Re: for your reading pleasure.. though maybe not
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 24, 2016, at 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: for your reading pleasure.. though maybe not", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 2:27 PM", "subject": "Re: for your reading pleasure.. though maybe not", "body": "yes, freeman dyson says that too.. That may be true at some level, and indeed during a period of the earth’s history when there was more CO2 (hundreds of millions of years ago), there were very large plants of certain types... but what does this imply, really? more corn in the arctic? do we need more corn in the arctic? He has cherry picked data, the typical act of those who believe the answer before they ask the question."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 24, 2016, at 11:32 AM", "subject": "Re: for your reading pleasure.. though maybe not", "body": "is the south pole getting colder and more ice ? is it accurate to say that climate changes can only be measured over long periods. 20 years or more. | m here with the trump peopl in palm and when asked i say i dont have any idea if this global warming is a threat that can be reduced , currently , carbon taking machines. i guess if that is really a concern. i would also like to know what groups prefer warming. canada?"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/24/2016 7:37:57 PM", "subject": "Re: for your reading pleasure.. though maybe not", "body": "I was in antarctica. The west antarctic ice sheet is melting at an unprecedented rate.. if it all goes into the ocean, sea levels will rise by about a meter. You are correct that we should ask if it can be reduced.. We are currently involved in a proposal that explores capturing CO2 from the atmosphere.. That may cost about 100/ton CO2.. if there was a carbon tax, that might be doable. it is not clear yet, but total research on this so far <10 Million. Total research each year on oil and gas exploration >2 billion."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030391.txt_8900
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030391.txt
subject: The fool doth think he is wise
messages:
  [{"sender": "John McFarlane [john.mcfarlane.barclays@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Staley, Jes: Barclays (LDN)"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 10, 2017 08:47 PM GMT Standard Time", "subject": "The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "Mason-Mahon is as brusque as he is ill informed."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023612.txt_8902
source_file: IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023612.txt
subject: Re: Larry Summers
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "jermaine , please organzie kelly to have use of the mini van. today"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Thank you! We are so grateful..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2014, at 12:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "you will get a call from either jermain, or cecile ( the governors wife and my asst )"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Ann brought us the car. It's wonderful, thank you so much.\nWe are so grateful for your generosity..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2014, at 1:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "glad to help"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly <is@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 6 2014 02:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Mr. Epstein:\n\nMany, many thanks for your overwhelming generosity. EM and I flew home today with Mr. Farkas and\nhis family. They took very good care of us and they couldn't have been nicer. Andrew and I are still\nstuck in St. Thomas, enjoying the use of your car.\n\nWe are extremely grateful for everything you have done for us.\n\nHappy New Year and hope to see you next time you are at Harvard.\n\nFondly,\nKelly Friendly"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029126.txt_8909
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029126.txt
subject: Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)
messages:
  [{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Hi: When are you back in NY?\nAttached is the complete Preproduction Book for Radical Breakthroughs - now including Misha Gromov!\nLove your feedback, suggestions.\nAlso attached is the budget and timing of funding, as presented originally, now updated for the completion of preproduction (phase I). We are ready to go into production (phase II). See Budget, p. 4. Committed and excited.\nWhen to meet?\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 28, 2017, at 7:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "great work , but needs some editing, did not like multi verse and sensience. seems more blahblah"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "`Blahblahs' forbidden in 'Radical Breakthroughs'. So we need two replacements (for Multiverse as Science and Rare Sentience).\nInitial ideas:\n* Expand the first episode \"Mathematics and Truth\" into two or likely three episodes. I'm intrigued by this because there is so much rich material - pure math, philosophy (discovered or invented), physics (Wigner's 'unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences)', astrophysics, cosmology, biology, general systems theory. I've felt frustrated in this first episode because there is so much material. I think three episodes could work - if you agree, I'll get back to you with a suggested structure of the 2 or likely 3 parts. Also, Closer To Truth has had only a few videos and one episode on mathematics per se (out of 277 episodes!), so this would be original and complementary. In this may, math would become about half the series.\n* Integrated Information Theory - quantifying and explaining consciousness (Giulio Tononi, Un of Wisconsin-Madison), plus supporters and critics. New controversial, science-based radical theory.\n* Evolutionary Dynamics - your program at Harvard - mathematical models. This is not an area of my expertise, but it could well fit Closer To Truth in general and Radical Breakthroughs in particular. But you need to tell me if you would like to include this.\n* Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability in biomedical and especially psychological research - the scandal in recent years. See links and attachments.\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication crisis\nhttps://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248\nhttp://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716\n\"Replicability vs. Reproducibility\" - http://www.replicability.tau.ac.il/index.php/replicability-in-science/replicability-vs-reproducibility.html\nFive Ways to Fix Statistics - Nature [attached].\n* Other possibile areas you suggest\nWe would like to set a mutually agreed schedule so we can confirm and reserve the Closer To Truth 'season' of 13 episodes for 'Radical Breakthroughs', which we need to plan well in advance - especially as we begin 2018.\nSee you Jan. 5 - Looking forward to brainstorming.\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "weekend easy"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Tomorrow Sunday after 1:00 pm? Flexible. Anytime.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 30, 2017, at 8:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "guest s here until 4. after good"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "12/31/2017 1:58:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "After 4 good.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033068.txt_8920
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033068.txt
subject: Re: no chile
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "have cancelled my flight to chile.. did so while on way to jfk and found a flight to portland at the same time.. will be home tonight.. can we talk tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jan 14, 2018, at 3:33 PM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "why?"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 9:36 PM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "so.. what do you think of the letter on the whole? This is very scary, but I see that they keep contacting students, postdocs etc, and are not letting up.. I really need your feedback.\n\nwill talk tomorrow.. on plane now."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 9:52 PM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "Of course"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "1/15/2018 2:57:30 AM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "He publicly shed and defend ed his told in publishing trash . Right to know I think you should distinguish yourself from trump"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030311.txt_8927
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030311.txt
subject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 105 characters]

messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Reiter/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Palm Beach Post Editorial"], "timestamp": "07/10/2008 02:36PM", "subject": "Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": "Margie, \nIT As you know, nothing too big or too small for us, especially in the summer IT Hmmmmm. I have to be \ndirect -- you or someone at your paper was very astute in checking the Clerk and Comptroller's computer \nand activity in the Epstein case two days before the hearing. As result, you sent me a text message on \nSaturday asking what the activity was about and I confirmed that the plea would take place. You were \nthe only member of the news media that I talked with. And yet, after the case is completely over, the \nPalm Beach Daily News' editorial staff remains silent on the topic. \nThanks, \nMike"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:59 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert D. Critton Jr.", "Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "2/26/2010 6:37:49 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029898.txt_8930
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029898.txt
subject: Fwd: idea for jefferey e.
messages:
  [{"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Lawrence H. Summers"], "timestamp": "January 7, 2015 at 5:01:26 PM PST", "subject": "idea for jefferey e.", "body": "Perhaps you should suggest Jefferey talk to Joe Lockhart at the Glover Park Group. He has helped Clinton and General\nPetraeus.\n\nJoe is great and he likes you a lot. LMK if you want to reach out to him. He is an old friend...."}, {"sender": "Lawrence H. Summers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/8/2015 1:26:40 AM", "subject": "Fwd: idea for jefferey e.", "body": "Not terrible idea."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030384.txt_8936
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030384.txt
subject: Fwd:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn (i: Diucash, Alan"], "timestamp": "10/17/2016 2:39:57 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "are they taking the deduction ONLY to get the obama care benefit. /???? call joslin"}, {"sender": "Brad Wechsler", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:38 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "The taxes are ready to go according to RJ and Tom. There were two changes made last friday: $4mm of RA and\nArtspace losses can/shld reduce the 3.8% medicare tax and $7mm of TRA payments shld also be exempt from\nmedicare taxes (consistent with prior year APO and Akin Gump advice). In aggregate this increases our\noverpayment by $400k.\n\nPls call me and I'll find rich and tom if you want to discuss. Thx, b\n\nOtherwise, taxes are complete and we are ready to press the button and file electronically. B"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032972.txt_8937
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032972.txt
subject: Re: A few favors...
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "So...I'm doing this Trump book for a pile of money and with so far quite a bit of cooperation from them (DT \ncalled me the other day and spent 45 minutes on the phone ranting and raving about the media--alarming). I \nwonder if you could introduce me to Tom Barrack--just to say I'm a journalist who you know and trust, and \nthat I'll follow up with a description of the project that I'm doing. Also, I'd love a reintroduction to Kathy \nRuemmler. I need some off-the-record perspective on White House procedures. \nAre you in NYC soon?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "can you send me an email to forward to tom. hes in the middle o some of the mess at the \nmoment. everyone lawyering up in wash. ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "When in NYC?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 1:52:46 PM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "today only"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026567.txt_8941
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026567.txt
subject: Fwd: Lesley: Please deliver to Jeffrey
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/10/2012 10:56:42 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Lesley: Please deliver to Jeffrey", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Charles Stevenson", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "July 10, 2012 5:45:56 PM EDT", "subject": "Lesley: Please deliver to Jeffrey", "body": "Jeffrey, \nThank you for your gifts to Bard College. Every dollar is deeply appreciated. \nCharles"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030915.txt_8944
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030915.txt
subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
messages:
  [{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss Laie aT"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "On Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "On Apr 6, 2011, at 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/7/2011 2:05:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ps. I have decided that Feynman would have done what I did.. and Iam therefore content.. no matter what.. :)"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025233.txt_8955
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025233.txt
subject: Approach Summary
messages:
  [{"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, December 16 2011 06:41 PM", "subject": "Approach Summary", "body": "1. Optimizing good information to push down the negative: using new content (blog,\nwebsites, press releases, public network profiles, google images, etc) and search engine\noptimization. Changing the Wikipedia profile. Notes Wikipedia below.\n\n2. Eliminating the bad information using prevalence and proprietary algorithms; redirecting\nthe way in which Google sequences your information (reassociating it with the positive\ncontent). This is called off-page optimization.\n\n3. Eliminating personal information (social sec, tel #’s, dob, addresses etc) from all public\nand private directories.\n\nCOMMENTS:\n\nStep 2 is critical otherwise one is just bailing water from an ongoing flood of negative press. By\nrealigning the algorithms (i.e. reinforcing positive associations with your name and weakening the\nnegative associations), one almost permanently seals up the water hole or at least closes it\nsignificantly. This allows for Step 1 to be a onetime project (which will take 2 to 4 months approx.),\nwith just tweaking here and there down the road with updated content.\n\nBEST PEOPLE TO USE:\n\nYou need people who eat, drink and sleep algorithms and search engine optimization. I’ve\nresearched several companies and the most skilled, discrete, award winning and comprehensive is\na company called, www.reputation.com based in Silicon Valley. See their attached docs for review.\nBelow are bulleted key points on them:\n\nLookup Page just creates web pages and will not solve your problem.\n\nI would serve as a liaison between you and Reputation. I would monitor their progress and provide\nthem with all positive content that they need. They would make sure that the content has maximum\nalgorithmic potential. You could keep your positive content simple (using you Edge.org summary\nwhich is good), or expand your content with updates on current science work and scientists. The\nbenefit of the former, is that it keeps you more anonymous. The benefit of the latter is that is\nalgorithmically associates you to a larger pool of known scientists, further pushing up positive\ncontent. My advice would be to combine the two: a simple repetitive bio summary of you but with a\nlarger list of scientists added on. But I would ask the Reputation team about this: saying that the\nmain goal is to enhance anonymity and algorithmic associations at the same time.\n\nWHY REPUTATION (in no particular order)\n\nRepresents numerous fortune 500 companies\n\nclients in more than 100 countries\n\nbased in Silicon Valley\n\nFeatured on CNN, WSJ, Forbes, NY Times etc\n\nUndisputed world leader in online reputation management\n\nPrevalence and proprietary algorithms to drive positive search results to the top.\nIntimate knowledge of search engine optimization.\n\n200+ employees\n\nPatented Internet technology"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027045.txt_8970
source_file: IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027045.txt
subject: Re: Trump promises to host Italian prime minister Giuseppe Conte at White House to honor him
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/10/2018 12:35:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump promises to host Italian prime minister Giuseppe Conte at White House to honor him", "body": "Putin in vienna --your guy setting up and hosting"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jun 2018 06:37:25 -0600", "subject": "Re: Trump promises to host Italian prime minister Giuseppe Conte at White House to honor him", "body": "good work"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 6:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump promises to host Italian prime minister Giuseppe Conte at White House to honor him", "body": "https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/687949002\n\nIt Begins"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014312.txt_8971
source_file: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014312.txt
subject: Financials: buy XLF Mar17 $22 call with $26 KO for $0.87 with full premium rebate on KO
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn [nn |]"], "timestamp": "11/17/2016 6:05:47 PM", "subject": "Financials: buy XLF Mar17 $22 call with $26 KO for $0.87 with full premium rebate on KO", "body": "Our Financials Conference was this week and client attendance was up by 66% from last year. Yes, banks/financials\nmight pull back at some point after this run-up but we would be buyers on any pullbacks and we continue to see further\nupside from multiple expansion and earnings growth. Our analyst raised her price targets by ~11% across the board. The\nlong term rotation from bonds and div stocks into sectors like financials is only beginning.\n\nVol is higher on the week; what prices well now:\n\nBuy the XLF March 2017 $22 call with $26 Knock-Out (continuous) for $0.87, with a full premium\nrebate if knock-out occurs.\n\nThis prices attractively given flat call skew and if XLF breaches $26 and this knocks out, at least you get your\npremium back.\n\nPlease find our Financials report attached.\n\nFuture of Financials conference hosted 90 public and private companies at our Future of Financials conference. We are\nraising our price objectives across most of our names. Three primary reasons why we think there is upside remaining\nafter the recent rally: 1) an improved outlook on both activity levels and interest rates, driving revenue upside; 2)\npotentially lower regulatory burden, particularly as new supervisory leadership can come with the new administration;\nand 3) relatively lighter positioning in US financials vs. other sectors. (Erika Najarian)"}, {"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["‘jeffrey E.'", "‘Richard Kahn'"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 14, 2016 12:05 PM", "subject": "RE: Financials trade for Monday", "body": "We continue to see buyers of XLF today. Funds are underweight financials in all regions, valuations are\nreasonable, earnings are improving and financials tend to outperform when bond yields rise.\n\nVol is higher today — refreshed pricing below.\n\nBuy an XLF 17March2017 call spread:\ne Buy the 105% call / sell a 110% call with a 115% at-expiry knock-in\ne Total premium: 1.86%\n\nGlobal Positioning in Stocks: Nigel Tupper notes the 4000 funds in our \"Positioning in Stocks\" analysis\n\nare more underweight Financials, on average, than any other sector and are underweight this sector in all\nregions of the world. If earnings continue to improve and yield rise, which is often the case in an upturn in our\n\nGlobal Wave, then the unloved Financials sector has the potential to continue to outperform.\n\nGlobal Quant Panorama: \"Bearish on Bonds\" stocks (which tend to move in the opposite direction to\n\nbond yields) tend to outperform our \"Bullish On Bonds\" when bond yields rise. The sectors that tend to\n\nperform best as bond yields rise are Energy, Tech, Materials, Banks, and Diversified Financials. Of these\nsectors, the laggards this year have been Banks and Diversified Financials. With a PE of 15.9x and a PB of\n2.0x, Global valuations are reasonable. Also, Risk is near all-time lows in terms of PE in most regions. Now\nthat macro and earnings data have triggered the beginning of a rotation, Value becomes very relevant."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026074.txt_8974
source_file: IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026074.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "nathan myrhvold. suggested you use him as arefrence for masa. on another note. lots of investigations going slow as no one to lead , but when the justice dept staff gets filled. OY."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr. <landon.thomas@nytimes.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, April 21 2017 05:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will give that a try. Bill Gates would carry more of a punch:) Saw Mnuchin/Cohn in DC -- they are talking a big game but I don't knowif they can deliver on tax reform. What do you think? I don't know why Trump does not reach out to Schumer -- two outer borough guys who know each other and can talk to each other. He has to move away from the right wing nutters back to the middle which is his natural space anyway."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032782.txt_8979
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032782.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 15, 2018, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "new york soon?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Unsure. What is up"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 16, 2018, at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wed presidnt of united nations , interesting person for you"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 8:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do the Russians have stuff on Trump?\nToday was appalling even by his standards."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018, at 7:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my email is full with similar comments . wow\nIm sure his view is that it went super well . he thinks he has charmed his adversary. . Admittedly he has no\nidea of the symbolism . He has no idea of most things"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/17/2018 12:01:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will call later. What number?"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030339.txt_9003
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030339.txt
subject: Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 7:03:47 PM", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 30, 2015 12:00 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg, \nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London. \nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client. \nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to \nwhich he has not responded. \nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his \nresponse by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015. \nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email.\n\nYours faithfully,\nDavid Pegg"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033488.txt_9004
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033488.txt
subject: Beoing update
messages:
  [{"sender": "Larry", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/26/2011 4:34:41 PM", "subject": "Beoing update", "body": "Jeffrey, \nBoeing status: \nBoeing will be completed May 6th,. \n-re weigh \n-three mandatory AD compliance \n-FDR Flight Data recorder repair,. \n-leak in flap drive gear box,. \n05 check will be accomplished July 30th,. \nThe maintenance facility is completing \"Trumps\" New Boeing 757 at this time here,. Eric Roth is doing the interior,. I was \ntold Trump sold his B727 to a person in Singapore?? \nthx,"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028576.txt_9005
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028576.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:37 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:14 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:41 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im off to europe, tomorrow. ."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:21 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Then I am going to have to make change the world decisions without you...(I am in london tomorrow-friday but I assume you are going to paris)\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "What number are you on? I won't talk sensitive, i want to tell you google"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "At cheryl's...sitting with her...watching trump shit...is Google going to happen?\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:39 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I have two more bidders"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jesusfuckingchrist....give me one of them....ready for a change\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Im told southern District trying yo get out a rico claim against the org"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:18 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You are not in nyc now are you?\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:24 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "are you nuts. im a cowardly warm blooded jew. call me"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I will at some point....what time do you leave tomorrow\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 8:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Turns out you were right about sdny but they are \"going to wait their turn\"...\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:04 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Civil or crime"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Crim\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:07 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you seemed to imply that your new guy could only shoot blanks? if thats so. its an easy decision., if not. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Still have to figure out what my role is in all this shit...\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:04 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "do you think he has the goods?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Not my new guy...not repping him\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "i suggest we wait until face to face Privileged - Redacted\nL. !"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 11:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "So....remarkably...in the middle of dealing with thiss the Steptoe numbercrunchers advise me Jeffrey has paid about 450 and owes about 300 and seems disinclined to make Steptoe whole.....hhhhhmmmm....first reaction is deja vu....: Privileggd - Redacted\nPrivileged - Redacted As you know I am the 800 pound gorilla here, Steptoe is not going to chase you down for the money but there are 500 lawyers here, processes, etc......"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "im not sheyl, frankly i havent been involved in this at all except for the ridiculousness . we will resolve it by end of month. ."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 11:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Ok....but give me an idea what follows the but....otherwise I will imagine the worst...."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 25, 2019 10:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Rajeev misra....softbank vision fund...any special jeffrey insights here?\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [mailto:jeevacation@cimail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 25, 2019 7:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "If he wants you to rep him. YES"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Cal me if you get a chance..."}, {"sender": "J [mailto:jeevacation@cimail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "brad represent softbank ,not rajeev , but did speak to him yesterday, re DB"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 7:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Very small fucking world....obviously don't mention my role with brad till we both think it useful"}, {"sender": "J [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "of course not. ! I've been called many things in the press recently -- retarded - is not one of them"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Just want to make sure if brad and reid were in a burning building and you could save only one............................."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "kathy would tacke me if i were to save you :)"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "So knew what your answer was going to be\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [mailto:jeevacation@qmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 2:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "sorry but i cant get the image of a naked lily sanchez out of my head."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 8:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Calm down....it was about 30 years ago, fleeting (and not that bad)"}, {"sender": "J [mailto:jeevacation@qmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 2:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Ha"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 8:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Ever hear of a french/Israeli lawyer named ron soffer who has his main office in paris...(a yid who also works out of nyc)"}, {"sender": "J [mailto:jeevacation@qmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 3:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "as you may know i am very good friends with the sec gen council of europe , human rights court. . they know each other well"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 9:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "He wants me to hire him....thinking about using him on the Softbank caper"}, {"sender": "J [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 3:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "go slow"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/26/2019 9:24:09 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "As is often (but not always) the case you are correct....see if you can 'get the book' on him"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029831.txt_9007
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029831.txt
subject: Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["'Martin G. Weinberg’"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. we’re planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number is x. 20d available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\nReuters News\n\nThomson Reuters\n\noffice:\nMobile:"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 28, 2016 at 12:14:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sorry, the suit is attached to this email."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 28, 2016, at 12:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jack Goldberger", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:59:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032796.txt_9010
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032796.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "avenatti civil suit now goes front and center? I guess trump just refuses ? how are you feeling?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Quite a day...have a feeling cohen is just beginning to make trouble...where are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "david pecker ? what happends to him"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Big trouble"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 7:28 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "does he flip"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/21/2018 11:32:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Of course"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033305.txt_9030
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033305.txt
subject: good call on pence
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/14/2016 5:13:01 PM", "subject": "good call on pence", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/15/us/politics/mike-pence-donald-trump-vice-president.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013482.txt_9034
source_file: IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013482.txt
subject: Report on Stem Cells future
messages:
  [{"sender": "Steven Victor MD", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/23/2012 1:06:38 PM", "subject": "Report on Stem Cells future", "body": "PUBLISHED: 22 NOVEMBER 2012\n\nThe view from the US: Stem cell therapy steps up a gear with first\n\napproval and improved political climate\n\nSpecial Report\n\nPeter Winter\n\nPositive clinical data, increases in federal funding and the first regulatory approval of a manufactured stem\ncell product mean momentum is building in the US. With the re-election of President Obama, this is likely to\ncontinue\n\nShare on twitterShare on linkedinShare on facebookShare on email\n\nImage: Bigstock\n\nWhen US President Barack Obama came into office he made good on his promise to overturn President George W. Bush’s executive\norder that - with the exception of a handful of existing stem cell lines - prohibited federal funding of human embryonic stem cell (hESC)\nresearch.\n\nSpecial Report - Stem Cell Research under Horizon 2020\n\nStem Cell Research in Horizon 2020: Experts debate what Europe must do to maintain its lead in regenerative medicine\nThe view from the US: Stem cell therapy steps up a gear with first approval and improved political climate\n\nView from Europe: Delivering on the vision of regenerative medicine and stem cells\n\nTalking to the experts: Why the EU should support human embryonic stem cell research in Horizon 2020\n\nOVERVIEW: Regenerate the future - human embryonic stem cell research is crucial to deliver health and growth\n\nThis easing of restrictions on hESC research was expected to engender enough confidence to attract investors into the space and\nencourage pharmaceutical and biotech companies to build robust product pipelines based on stem cell therapies. However, a tougher\nregulatory climate for biopharmaceuticals in general and a protracted legal challenge to the relaxing of rules on hESCs has served to\nkeep both big pharma companies and venture capitalists on the sidelines to date.\n\nNevertheless, there has been progress, particularly at the research end of the development spectrum. Three and a half years on stem\ncells are no longer high on the political agenda as they once were. This speaks to the generally positive public acceptance of stem cell\nresearch in the US. A Research!America poll of likely voters in the presidential election, conducted in August 2012, found that 61 per\ncent of prospective voters were in favor of expanding funding for hESC research.\n\nInvestor interest\n\nLooking back over his first term in office Obama can point to some major gains. These include funding increases for the National\nInstitutes of Health’s (NIH) stem cell initiatives, and greater investor interest in the wider field of regenerative medicine including the use\nof adult stem cells and induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells.\n\nHowever, it hasn’t all been smooth sailing. Although after protracted forethought, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave the\ngreen light for the Californian biotech Geron to begin the very first human clinical trial of a human embryonic stem cell-derived therapy\nin January 2009, the trial has not been without its problems.\n\nThe Phase | trial, treating patients with acute spinal cord injury, was hit with an FDA clinical hold causing significant delays to its\ninitiation in 2010. A year later, after 15 years’ effort, the Geron washed its hands of the programme, blaming its withdrawal from the\nstem cell space on capital scarcity and uncertain economic conditions. The decision wiped out a leading player in hESC translation and\ncommercialisation. However, the regenerative medicine sector has been able to recover and is beginning to blossom. (See Public\nMarkets section below). The prime movers in the Geron trial are now attempting to revive it.\n\nResearch funding robust\n\nFederal funding for all forms of stem cell research has increased over the past four years. However, the NIH funding component for\nhESC has been dogged by litigation for the past three years. In Sherley v. Sebelius, researchers James Sherley and Theresa Deisher,\nwho worked with adult stem cells, claimed the NIH guidelines violated the Dickey-Wicker Amendment, which prohibits the use of federal\nfunds for research in which human embryos are destroyed or discarded. This overhang was not finally removed until August 2012 when\na three-judge panel from the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit unanimously upheld the NIH 2009 guidelines that\npermit funding of hESC research."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022187.txt_9035
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022187.txt
subject: Fwd: CNN Inquiry
messages:
  [{"sender": null, "recipients": ["JEE"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 13, 2016 6:08 PM", "subject": "Fwd: CNN Inquiry", "body": "Fyi\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Melanie Hicken <hit-reply@linkedin.com>", "recipients": ["as <a"], "timestamp": "October 13, 2016 at 8:03:22 PM GMT+2", "subject": "CNN Inquiry", "body": "Hi\n\nI’m a reporter at CNN, and my colleague Blake Ellis and I have read that Bill Clinton and Donald\nTrump have both visited Epstein’s private island. We are trying to determine whether there is any\ntruth to the allegations that either or both of these men may have had sexual relations with minors\nwhile there. We know that you have been Epstein’s pilot, so we’re wondering if you would be willing\nto speak with us completely off the record. We are not focusing on the allegations against Epstein --\nwe are solely focusing on Trump and Clinton given the current allegations being levied in the press.\n\nIf you don’t feel comfortable sharing anything via social media or email, feel free to send us any\ndocumentation/proof that might be helpful anonymously via mail:\n\nMelanie Hicken\n6430 Sunset Blvd #300\nLos Angeles, CA 90028\n\nYou can also reach us by phone\n\nThanks so much,\nMelanie"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033463.txt_9039
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033463.txt
subject: Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "Jun 24, 2011, 7:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "eric, price for a re-rag , new seats , g-v , paint and interior, plus approx time after choosing fabrics etc."}, {"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Any photos? Serial number?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 25, 2011 12:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not yet"}, {"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "Jeffrey-\n\nI need to start off by stating that it is not my intent to go around Shawn Lancaster on this — Shawn is a friend. \nThis being said, I have received e-mails from both you and Larry this weekend. \nI called Larry and he said I should send you an e-mail. \nI called a close friend of mine inquiring about the GV market and aircraft that are \"not published\". As of today, there are \neight (8) of these aircraft that are not yet on the market. \nLet me know if you would like to speak with him and by what means (you call him, he call you, call Larry?....whatever). \nBy the way, his company sold Trumps 727 and got Trump a very attractive number for an aircraft that was on it's way to \na museum. \n\nHope all is well. \n\nSincerely,\nEric Roth"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "6/27/2011 4:45:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "of course i will speak send me his number, or have him call"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022193.txt_9057
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022193.txt
subject: Re: we'll see
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I only met Jeffrey Epstein, after I was adult. ( over 18). I was never, ever, his \"sex slave \" . obviously a lurid chauvenistic categorization. which in my opinion could only have been made by some loser of a repressed male reporter. He was always kind , funny and generous to me . These fantasy fabrications made by a delusional thief. ( charged with stealing from the burger place and which she worked, though she claimed to paid thousands of dollars in cash and held at the beck and call of the genious tycoon. ) . Her story telling had it been done while sleeping would have been called dreaming, if awake, hallucinaitons but to the English press they are referred to as allegations . She claimed in the minutest of detail , her dinner with President Clinton on the Caribean Island, How he arrived . ( by black heli). where he sat. ,(on jeffreys left.) a 21st century tale of power, sex, money. The fact is that this story is total make believe , fabricated on purpose to gain tabloid attention ,and easily refuted by readily availalble travel records of a former president. . it defies belief that any person would take seriously such a preposterous story. little different than her telling her father that she met the queen, whoops- he believed her though her mother at the relevant time complained that she must have been engaging in satan worship and asked that she be put her in a drug home. cmon. Iam currenty a professional pilot with a spotless record. I have a checklist that I follow before every flight to verify"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "It was a first draft"}, {"sender": "iS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I know, I like where it's going.."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 7:19 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Normally it's the copilots job to call out], in this instance I'm calling her out)):"}, {"sender": "i ot", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Yes, let's do it. I like most of it. Would like less personal attacks and more reasons why allegations are ridiculous.. Love the fact checking story. Just a few days ago, I toyed with the idea of posting a photo of me doing a preflight inspection and saying I wished other professions would have that requirement before putting innocent people's lives at risk."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029616.txt_9059
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029616.txt
subject: Re: Disaster but maybe i
messages:
  [{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Mar 16, 2019, at 5:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "Firm delivered through humor"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 5:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "Figuring out how.\n\nCould say she has now used up 80 percent of what she was owed through my changes in plan.\nOr say xi changes meeting w trump.\n\nI think she is tired of this alas.\n\nSustaining w secrecy hard."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Mar 16, 2019, at 7:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "you could say something like . try not to call him larry by mistake.. though it would be amusing."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 1:56:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "Not funny"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032769.txt_9060
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032769.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "4/14/2018 10:42:58 PM", "subject": "", "body": "What do u make of latest trump follies?"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028508.txt_9062
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028508.txt
subject: nanosatelites are getting hot
messages:
  [{"sender": "Seach #8", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/6/2014 2:23:23 PM", "subject": "nanosatelites are getting hot", "body": "http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21603441-where-nanosats-boldly-go-new-businesses-will-followunless-they-\nare-smothered-excessive\n\nTechnology — Full text articles\n\nSatellites: Space: the next startup frontier\nThe Economist\n\nAROUND 1,000 operational satellites are circling the Earth, some of them the size and weight of a large car. In the past\nyear they have been joined by junior offspring: 100 or so small satellites, some of them made up of one or more 10cm\n(4-inch) cubes. They may be tiny, but each is vastly more capable than Sputnik, the first man-made satellite launched\nby Russia in 1957. And many more are coming.\n\nSpace hardware used to cost so much that it was available only to generals, multinationals and the most privileged\nscientists. No more. Many of these nanosats, as small satellites weighing no more than a few kilograms are called,\nhave been launched for small companies, startups and university departments, sometimes with finance raised on\ncrowdfunding websites. Their construction costs can be down in the tens of thousands of dollars, which makes them\nthousands of times cheaper than today’s big satellites. Admittedly, there is much they cannot do, but with that sort of\nprice differential, and some ingenious use of the abilities they do have, they could be surprisingly competitive players on\na number of fronts. In the next five years another 1,000 nanosats are expected to be launched.\n\nTwo trends are setting up nanosats for further success. Like people working on everything from robots to 3D printers,\nnanosat builders are harvesting the benefits of ever better, ever cheaper components built for smartohones and other\nconsumer electronics. Some nanosats even contain complete smartphones, making use of the clever operating\nsystems, radios and cameras which phones now contain. For as long as phones go on getting cheaper and more\ncapable, so will nanosats. The cheapest so far—a tiny chipsat—was assembled for just $25, though it has yet to be\nsuccessfully launched.\n\nThe launch systems too are getting much cheaper. SpaceX, the innovative rocket-maker founded by Elon Musk, has\nalready brought down the costs of getting into space; it and its competitors could reduce them a lot further. The biggest\nbeneficiaries will at first be people who make big satellites. But more big satellites will mean more opportunities for\nsmall satellites to piggy-back on their launches. And some companies are looking at cheap little launch systems tailored\nspecifically to the needs of the nanosatellite. One reason space engineers are notoriously conservative is that the costs\nof failure are high. As making and launching satellites gets cheaper, it will be ever easier for innovative, risk-taking\nnanosat-makers to orbit around the lumbering incumbents.\n\nSize does impose limits. Nanosats cannot peer as closely at the Earth or carry out as many experiments as big\nsatellites. But for some jobs that does not matter. The plans that companies already have include using nanosats for\nmonitoring crops, studying the sun and tracking ships and aircraft. Such a system might have been able to track\nMalaysian Airlines flight MH370, which went missing in March.\n\nNano can do\n\nYet not everyone is thrilled. One worry is that constellations of nanosats will mean a big increase in space junk; but,\noperating in low-Earth orbit, they burn up on re-entry after a year or so. And being cheap, they can soon be replaced\nwith newer models. A more serious concern is that they are a “dual-use” technology: they could be used for military\npurposes. In America this has led to onerous restrictions.\n\nBarack Obama's administration has sensibly repealed a law of 1999 that required all satellites to be licensed by the\nState Department as munitions under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). This could mean that most\ncommercial satellites will be removed from ITAR by the end of the year and their export administered by the Commerce\nDepartment. But some satellite systems and spacecraft—including anything that can carry people into space—will\nremain under ITAR."}]


thread_id: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030347.txt_9063
source_file: IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030347.txt
subject: Re: told you , the case ws a fake
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: told you , the case ws a fake", "body": "The following transaction was entered by Meagher, Thomas on 11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT and filed on\n\n11/4/2016\n\nCase Name: Doe v. Trump et al\nCase Number: 1:16-cv-07673-RA\nFiler: Jane Doe\n\nDocument Number: 15\n\nDocket Text:\n\nNOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules\nof Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the\nabove-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All\nDefendants. Document filed by Jane Doe. (Meagher, Thomas)\n\n1:16-cv-07673-RA Notice has been electronically mailed to:"}, {"sender": "Eva Dubin <a-", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, November 4 2016 10:58 PM", "subject": "Re: told you , the case ws a fake", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028589.txt_9064
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028589.txt
subject: RE: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid I", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/26/2019 7:19:44 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Calm down....it was about 30 years ago, fleeting (and not that bad)"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 2:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sorry but i cant get the image of a naked lily sanchez out of my head."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "So knew what your answer was going to be"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "kathy would tacke me if i were to save you :)"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Just want to make sure if brad and reid were in a burning building and you could save only one............................."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "of course not. ! I've been called many things in the press recently -- retarded - is not one of them"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 7:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Very small fucking world....obviously don't mention my role with brad till we both think it useful"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "brad represent softbank ,not rajeev , but did speak to him yesterday, re DB"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Cal me if you get a chance....212 506 3914"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@dmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 25, 2019 7:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If he wants you to rep him. YES"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Rajeev misra....softbank vision fund...any special jeffrey insights here?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "im not sheyl, frankly i havent been involved in this at all except for the ridiculousness we will resolve it by end of month. ."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Ok....but give me an idea what follows the but....otherwise I will imagine the worst...."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@dmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "i suggest we wait until face to face yes he fucked up. but"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "So....remarkably...in the middle of dealing with thiss the Steptoe numbercrunchers advise me Jeffrey has paid about 450 and owes about 300 and seems disinclined to make Steptoe whole.....hhhhhmmmm....first reaction is déjà vu.... How the fuck are we back here after the unspeakably awful evan barr debacle.... More to the point just tell me where you are on this....did miller fuck up? Something else? As you know I am the 800 pound gorilla here, Steptoe is not going to chase you down for the money but there are 500 lawyers here, processes, etc......"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@dmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think he has the goods?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not my new guy...not repping him"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you seemed to imply that your new guy could only shoot blanks? if thats so. its an easy decision. , if not. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Still have to figure out what my role is in all this shit..."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Crim"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Civil or crime"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Turns out you were right about sdny but they are \"going to wait their turn\"..."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 8:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will at some point....what time do you leave tomorrow"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you nuts. im a cowardly warm blooded jew. call me"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 6:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You are not in nyc now are you?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im told southern District trying yo get out a rico claim against the org"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesusfuckingchrist....give me one of them....ready for a change"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I have two more bidders"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "At cheryl's...sitting with her...watching trump shit...is Google going to happen?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What number are you on? I won't talk sensitive, i want to tell you google"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Then I am going to have to make change the world decisions without you...(I am in london tomorrow-friday but I assume you are going to paris)"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im off to europe, tomorrow. ."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 4:37 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:14 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033311.txt_9068
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033311.txt
subject: trump making a nice move..
messages:
  [{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/14/2016 2:33:10 PM", "subject": "trump making a nice move..", "body": "Importance: High \n\nElection Polls 1President Polls 1State Polls Senate Polls 1House Polls Governor Polls lApproval Polls \nWednesday, September 14 \nRace/Topic (Click to Sort) Poll \nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton LA Times/USC Tracking \nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Reuters/Ipsos  \nJohnson vs. Stein \nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton Reuters/Ipsos  \nOhio: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson  \nvs. Stein  \nOhio: Trump vs. Clinton \nMaine: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson  \nvs. Stein  \nMaine CD2: Trump vs. Clinton vs.  \nJohnson vs. Stein \nMassachusetts: Trump vs. Clinton vs.  \nJohnson vs. Stein \nKansas: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson \nvs. Stein  \nSouth Carolina: Trump vs. Clinton vs.  \nJohnson vs. Stein \nKansas Senate - Moran vs. Wiesner \nMaine 2nd District - Poliquin vs. Cain \nMaine 1st District - Holbrook vs.  \nPingree  \nPresident Obama Job Approval  \n2016 Generic Congressional Vote \nDirection of Country \nBloomberg \nBloomberg \nColby \nCollege/SurveyUSA \nColby \nCollege/SurveyUSA \nWBUR/MassINC  \nKSN News/SurveyUSA \nTrafalgar Group (R) \nKSN News/SurveyUSA*  \nColby \nCollege/SurveyUSA \nColby \nCollege/SurveyUSA \nReuters/Ipsos  \nReuters/Ipsos  \nReuters/Ipsos  \nResults \nClinton 42, Trump 47  \nClinton 39, Trump 39,  \nJohnson 8, Stein 2  \nClinton 40, Trump 39  \nTrump 44, Clinton 39,  \nJohnson 10, Stein 3  \nClinton 43, Trump 48  \nClinton 42, Trump 39,  \nJohnson 9, Stein 5  \nTrump 47, Clinton 37,  \nJohnson 8, Stein 5  \nClinton 54, Trump 28,  \nJohnson 9, Stein 4  \nTrump 48, Clinton 36,  \nJohnson 8, Stein 2  \nTrump 53, Clinton 38,  \nJohnson 3, Stein 1  \nMoran 50, Wiesner 34 \nPoliquin 50, Cain 45  \nPingree 57, Holbrook 37 \nApprove 48, Disapprove \n48 \nDemocrats 40,  \nRepublicans 38  \nRight Direction 22, Wrong \nTrack 65  \nSpread \nTrump +5 \nTie \nClinton +1 \nTrump +5 \nTrump +5 \nClinton +3 \nTrump +10 \nClinton +26 \nTrump +12 \nTrump +15 \nMoran +16 \nPoliquin +5 \nPingree +20 \nTie \nDemocrats +2 \nWrong Track \n+43"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014516.txt_9073
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014516.txt
subject: Fwd: 2016 Election: Tax Changes Expected
messages:
  [{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "December 15, 2016 at 9:51:37 AM EST", "subject": "2016 Election: Tax Changes Expected", "body": "Rich, following up on your question from a while back about this topic. Please find a white paper attached.\n\nRegards,\n\nAmanda"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 5:40:04 PM", "subject": "Fwd: 2016 Election: Tax Changes Expected", "body": ""}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033339.txt_9076
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033339.txt
subject: Donald Trump I Deutsche Bank I House Intelligence Committee
messages:
  [{"sender": "David Mitchell", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2019 11:08:57 AM", "subject": "Donald Trump I Deutsche Bank I House Intelligence Committee", "body": "https://therealdeal.com/2019/01/09/congress-to-investigate-trumps-florida-property-sale-deutsche-bank-loans/"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033097.txt_9089
source_file: IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033097.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett iS", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "7/13/2018 11:11:16 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Im not angry , sorry, itis sad. it is apparent that you have no experience trading. we both made a mistake. . the spy trades were the results of a rank amatuer.. youtook a postion on the direction of the market. ok. you decided to play it extra short time and short. . why? becaue the options are cheaper. ? knowing full well that time premium was running. . first silly move. . I allowed as promised to give you authority. . you seta target. . it hit the traget, you moved in back. based on media reporting on trump visit? you didnt act. the market dipped and you panicked. . AMATEUR. wrong options wrong timing , no discipline and as a percentaage of investment. a one day dip fof 25%. wanting to buy the highter strike , is ok. but why the same month? why the same moment. why the same index. . sorry. I have taught this for many years. and your grade isanF. notone goodmoveinmany. . re broadcom. the crack happend in the morning. options were higher. no alternative presented. no analysis. , this is no way to manage money. I have lost a great deal of money hoping you would be able to do as you promised you could . would. Had you told me , jeffrey Id like to try a new job as a manager lets start slow I can learn. i would be less annoyed. you told me you had great confidence knew the risks and truly believed you would be able to raise money .do well and prosper. . If it were not you, this would have ended months ago.. we should work on a solution . not sure yet what shape it takes."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032741.txt_9097
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032741.txt
subject: Re:
messages:
  [{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am I seeing you tomorrow morning?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes 730?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Later possible? Need my beauty sleep"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tonight or tomnight"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Flying in from vancouver now...about to board...what works best for you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "either 73 am or 10 pm"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 3:33:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesus....see you at 730...will be eager to hear about your day today...."}]


thread_id: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032999.txt_9100
source_file: TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032999.txt
messages:
  [{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Walker, MD"], "timestamp": "5/17/2017 8:07:22 AM", "subject": null, "body": "told you http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/15/trump-expands-ban-on-abortion-funding-overseas.html"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032125.txt_9101
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032125.txt
subject: ASW Travel Deals: London, NYC, Miami, Maui, Racing in Baja, Hiking Moab and More
messages:
  [{"sender": "ASMALLWORLD [asmallworld@travel.asmallworld.net]", "recipients": ["jeeproject@yahoo.com"], "timestamp": "7/27/2011 2:09:40 PM", "subject": "ASW Travel Deals: London, NYC, Miami, Maui, Racing in Baja, Hiking Moab and More", "body": "If you are unable to see this message, click here to view. To ensure delivery to your inbox, add ASMALLWORLD@travel.asmallworld.net to your address book.\n\nEo\n\nActive Escapes, Quiet Getaways and More\nWednesday, July 27, 2011"}]


thread_id: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030732.txt_9108
source_file: IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030732.txt
subject: Re: bannon view of trump
messages:
  [{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/20/2018 2:11:44 PM", "subject": "Re: bannon view of trump", "body": "Haven’t watched this yet. But was with him for a few hours last night and got the full download: he think trump\n\nhas lost his stuff, and as well, to boot, is an idiot. Putin, tho, he thinks is a genius."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:58 AM", "subject": "Re: bannon view of trump", "body": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2X9E9n6GHC8"}]


thread_id: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022926.txt_9109
source_file: TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022926.txt
subject: Fwd: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
messages:
  [{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:03 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "As just received."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren lndyke"], "timestamp": "4/22/2015 7:16:34 PM", "subject": "Fwd: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}]


thread_id: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022346.txt_9123
source_file: IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022346.txt
subject: Oil options
messages:
  [{"sender": "Nav Gupta", "recipients": ["\"jeevacation@gmail.com\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Tazia Smith", "Paul Morris/db/ I", "Vinit Sahni/db/"], "timestamp": "03/12/2014 09:35 PM GDT", "subject": "Oil options", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nJust got off the phone with Vinit.\nDB stopped marketmaking OTC oil options - for short dated I'd go for exch traded - better liquidity and lower transaction costs in and\nout.\n\nMy central scenario - Kerry Lavrov meeting Friday will be a bust and the Crimea referendum this weekend will result in \"yes\" given\nthe 59pct ethic Russian makeup. Sunday/ Monday sanction rhetoric from ranging from g8 expulsion to Iran-style bank embargo is\nraised a notch. Russia follows with more threats of counter-sanctions. My sense is the Obama 5m of 696m SPR release is to show\nMerkel and co he will step in. He needs to because there are 8 small European and Baltic countries that rec 70%+ of their gas from\nRussia. Germany gets 30%.\n\nCross asset correlations outside of the US are increasing past few days - eg copper and the Turkish lira hourly charts are on top of each\nother past 4 days. I'm worried there is a 30-40pct(?) chance of a hard risk off move in markets in first half of next week - more focused\non European equities, copper, EM FX (Turkey, ZAR, Ruble etc) than SPX. In that scenario oil is way up.\n\nExchange WTI calls - there are 2 options (as of 3pm est):\n\n5day expiry 17march 2014 underlying clj4 97.92\n\nand\n\n35d expiry 16april2014 underlying clk4 97.59\n\n** The 5 day options are a bit short - one possibility is sell a 3usd out of the money put (95.5 strike) for 20cents and buy a 2usd OTM\n100 call for 25. Net pay 5cents. But 5d is a bit short for me.\n\n**For 35d expiry You could look at selling 91.50 (6usd OTM put) for 56cents and buying 103c¢ (5.5usd OTM) for 58cents or the 102c\n(4.5usd OTM) for 76cents.\n\nCL1 <comdty> OMON on Bloomberg has live strikes and bid/ask."}, {"sender": "Vinit Sahni", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "Paul Morris"], "timestamp": "03/13/2014 09:47 PM EDT", "subject": "Fw: Oil options", "body": "Jeffrey - apologise if this long to execute next time we'll be much quicker."}, {"sender": "Paul Morris", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/14/2014 10:27:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Oil options [C]", "body": "I do want to talk to u about this, they spent too much thinking about options here, let me know when u have couple minutes."}]


